HomeMy WebLinkAboutCPAM-12-007 AZ-13-003 PP-13-004 WOODBURN WEST SUBDIVISIONMERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA
a
E il)I
City Council Chambers
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ldaho
Thursday, June 06, 2013 at 7:00 p.m.
1. Roll-callAttendance
Macy Miller Michael Rohm
Scott Freeman _Joe Marshall
Steven Yearsley - Chairman
Adoption of the Agenda
Consent Agenda
A. Approve Minutes of May 16, 2013 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting
Action ltems
Public Hearing: RZ 13-004 Valenti Rezone by Jeanne Valenti
Located Northwest Corner of N. Meridian Road and W.
Washington Street Request: Rezone of 0.34 of an Acre from
the R4 (Medium-Low-Density Residential) Zoning District to
the O-T (Old Town)Zoning District
2
3
4
A.
Gontinued Public Hearing from May 16, 2013: CPAM 12-007
Woodburn West Subdivision by Northside Management
Located North of W. Ustick Road, Approximately 1/4 Mile East
of N. Linder Road Request: Amend the Future Land Use Map
Contained in the Comprehensive Plan to Change the Land Use
Designation on 6.8 +l- Acres of Land from Mixed Use-
Community (MU-C)with a Neighborhood Center (N.C.) Overlay
to MDR (Medium Density Residential)
Continued Public Hearing from May 16, 2013: AA. 13-003
Woodburn West Subdivision by Northside Management
Located North of W. Ustick Road, Approximately 1/4 Mile East
of N. Linder Road Request: Annexation and Zoning of 25.8
Acres of Land with an R-8 Zoning District
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda -
Thursday, June 06, 2013Page 1 ot 2
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property
of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 8884433 at least 48 hours prior to the public
meeting.
B.
c
Continued Public Hearing from May 16, 2013: PP 13-007
Woodburn West Subdivision by Northside Management
ofEast Located N. Linder North of Road W. Ustick Request: Road, Preliminary Approximately Plat 1/4 Mile Approval
Gonsisting of 99 Single-Family Residential Building Lots and
16 Common/Other Lots on 25.75 Acres of Land in a Proposed
R-8 Zoning District
Public Hearing: CUP 13-005 Red Tail Communities by W.H.
Moore Company Located Southeast Corner of E. Victory Road
and S. Meridian Road (SH 69) Request: Conditional Use Permit
Approval for a Muli-Family Development Consisting of 220
Residential Units in an R-15 Zoning District
Public Hearing: AZ 13-005 Paramount Northeast Subdivision
by Brighton Development, lnc. Located Southwest Corner of
Chinden Boulevard and N. Meridian Road Request: Annexation
and Zoning of 54.69 Acres of Land with C-C (17.68 Acres); TN-
C (3'1.27 Acres) and R-8 (5.74 Acres) Zoning Districts
Public Hearing: PP 13-008 Paramount Northeast Subdivision
by Brighton Development, lnc. Located South of Chinden
Boulevard on the West Side of N. Meridian Road Request:
Preliminary Plat Approval Consisting of 79 Single-Family
Residential Building Lots and Four (4) Common/Other Lots on
27 .23 Acres of Land in the R-8 Zoning District
E
F
G
H
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda -
Thursday June 06, 2}13page 2 ot 2
All materials presented at public meetings shalt become
property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the Ciiy Clerk's Office at 8884433 at least 48 hours prior
to the public meeting.
D.
Public Hearing: CUP 13-004 Riot Cheer Force by Joseph
Moorhead Located at 200 N. Baltic Place, Ste., 103 & 1 04
Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval for an lndoor
Recreation Facility in an l-L Zoning District
v
)t $
v
E IDIAN Planning Division
aChecklist PRELIMINARY PLAT r Application
All applications are required to contain one copy of the following:
Note: Only one copy of the above items need be submitted when submitting multiple applications
Additional Requirements for Preliminary Plat Applications:
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 . Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o
Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 o
Website: www.meridiancity.org
(02/08/20 1 3 )
*An$t P
name: f File #:
Applicant
({) Description
Staff
({)
t/ & Commission & Council Review
r/ Narrative fully describing the proposed project
,/. Legal description of the subject property (l,ot, Block, and Subdivision name if located in a recorded
tl Recorded subdivision OR a metes and deed bounds for the legal description of the property if not in a subdivision.)
,/, Affidavit ofLegal
Interest signed & notarized by the property Ownef (If owner is a corporation,
evidence to show that the pgrson signing is an authorized agent.)
V submit Scaled a copy vicinity of the map Articles o[ Incomoration the location or other ofthe subject property
/ Pre-application meeting notes (Alt applications
application meeting with the Planning Department.)
that require a public hearing are required to conduct a pre-
,/ meeting sign-in sheet (Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting to provide
an opportunity for public review of the proposed projectplior to
the submittal of an application.)
Neighborhood
rr, vapplicanUagent Parcel Commitment verification of letter from Posting form signed Services by the (887-2211)
\/
Fee (Please call Planning Department to calculate correct fee.
Applications with
incorrect fees will not be accepted.
)
Applicant
({) Description
Staff
({)
/
Include the following additional information in the project narrative:
the ordinance describing the particular provision, the variance requested, and the
reason thereof
V Approval developmen!of the proposed , (e.9.subdivision , larger rear name setback from to the buffer Ada adjoining County Surveyor's properties, office etc.)
/ Preliminary Plat-xI copy (folded to8Vz" x I t" size)
J The a following Proposed items subdivision must be included name (Do on not the use numbers preliminary in preliminary plat: plat names.)
,r'date /, a a Drafting Section location and county (situate statement)
t/ r Norl.h arrow
t/ a Scale (not less than l"=100')
/ a Name, address and phone number ofowner(s), applicant, and engineer, surveyor or
planner who prepared the preliminary plat
/ a Proposed site(s) for parks, playgrounds, schools, churches or other public
uses
tDAt{o
*
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 r Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 r Facsimile:
(208) 888-6854 r Website: www.meridiancity.org
,/ a common area lots and./or easements
/ a Streets, street names, rights-of-wa v
and road'way widths, including adjoining streets
or road on
/ a Proposed and existing lot lines and blocks showing scaled dimensions and numbers
of each
t/ ofs
/ Minimum residential house size R-2 and R-4 zones
/
a Contour lines shown at 5' intervals where land slope is greater than ljvo and, at2'
intervals where land slope is l\vo or less, referenced to an established benchmark,
including location and elevation
,/, a Any dedications to the public and easements together with a statement of location,
dimensions and of such
t/r'boundary , . a Floodplain stub streets boundary to as access determined to by FEMA or measures land to or amend this
/
/
Block faces not more than seven hundred fifty feet (750') in length for residential
districts, and five hundred feet (500') in rhe TN-C & TN-R districrs, wirhout an
intersecting, street or alley, except as allowed in UDC I l-6C-3F.3
I
f{ a Cul-de-sac not in excess of450'
{ Reduction of the preliminary pl at (8 Vz"
x 11")
/
Landscape plan - *I
copy (folded to 8Vz" x I l" size)
Planmusthave ascale no smallerthan I" = 50'(l"
= 20'is preferred) andbeona standarddrawing
sheet, not to exceed 36" x 48" (24" x 36" is preferred). A plan which cannot
be drawn in its entirety
on a single sheet must be drawn with appropriate match lines on two or more sheets.
The follorving items must be included on the Iandscape plan:
)/ north arrow, and ect name
t/
o Names, addresses, and telephone numbers ofthe developer and the person and/or
firm preparing the plan
/ a Existing natural features such as canals, creeks, drains, ponds, wetlands,
/
Location, size, and species of all existing trees on site with trunks 4 inches or
greater in diameter, measured 6 inches above the ground. Indicate whether the tree
will be retained or removed.
/ a A statement of how existing healthy trees proposed to be retained will be protected
from damage during construction
/
a Existing buildings, structures, planting areas, light poles, power poles, walls,
fences, berms, parking and loading areas, vehicular drives, trash areas, sidewalks,
pathways, stormwater detention areas, signs, street furniture, and other man-made
elements.
,/, a Existing and proposed contours for all areas steeper than20Vo slope. Berms shall
( r be Sight shown Triangles with one-as defined foot contours.in 1 I -3A-5 of this ordinance.
r/ t/. a a Proposed Proposed screening landscaping structures
/
a Calculations of project components to demonstrate compliance with the
requirements of this ordinance, including:
> Width of street buffers, lineal feet of street frontage, and number of street trees
) Residential subdivision trees
/
Written confirmation that a traffic impact study is not required and/or has been submitted for
review to ACHD. Please contact Mindy Wallace at387-6178 or Christy Little at 387-6144
for more information. tl
Submit two sets of ,-Y
t/-
Electronic Submittal disks
lr/
(l) Disk with electronic version of the conceptual engineering plans in a format
that http:complies //www.with meridi the Specifications for Project Drawings found rds/index.at:aso
t/
,/
(1) Electronic version of the preliminary plat & landscape plan in pdf format submitted
on a disk with the files named with project name & plan type (i.e. preliminary plat,
landscape plan, etc.). We encourage you to also submit at least one color version for
presentation purposes.
Supplementary information at the discretion of the Director or City Engineer may be required to sfficiently detail
the proposed development within any special development area, including but not limited to hillside, planned unit
development, floodplain, cemetery, manufactured home parks, and/or hazardous
or unique areas of development.
*Once an application is accepted, staffwill contact you to let
you know how many additional copies of plans are
required. All plans are required to be fuklg!
to 8 t/2"
x I l " size.
APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKLIST ARE
SUBMITTED. THIS APPLICATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE (NOR WILLA PUBLIC
HEARING BE SET) UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION.
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 r Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 e Facsimile:
(208) 888-6854 o Website: www.meridiancity.org
Conceptual elevations of proposed stru"tu.ei,
D,-
luo (rrr{'
rgpje
fjo r'o"t
, Jn'{ ^..,)n ana?ds.
-ffi^dfffiq{tt' l-- rt'a-ti
r,0J
r. -lo
d sovrR,
,l
E IDIAN Planning Department
INAHO ANNEXATION/REZONE r Application Checklist
name:
Application is required to contain one copy of the following
Note: Only one copy of the above items need be submitted when submitting multiple applications
Additional Requirements for Annexation/Rezone Applications
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALLAPPLICABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKLIST ARE
SUBMITTED.
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 r Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 r Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 e
Website: www.meridiancity.org
(Rev. ll/4/08)
E-,tvt
TLNd
J
I
'9'al<s -4
,L) File 4.
Applicant
(i)
Staff
x Completed & signed Commission & Council Review Application t/ ({)
x Narrative fully describing the proposed proiect
K
Legal description of the property to be annexed and./or rezoned
*'a , registered nctuae a metes professional & bounds land description surveyor, with to the a section calculated line closure of all adjacent sheet. roadways, stamped & signed by
F 'the Scalea Idaho State exhibit Tax map Commission showing the hoperty boundaries Tax Administrative of the legal description Rules IDAPA in compliance 35.01.03.il 225.the 01.requirements
h. of
11, .lf requesting more than one zoning designation, include
a legal description for each zone along with an overall
/Fannexation/rezone boundary description. Also include the boundaries of each different zone on the map.
*Note: When also submitting a Preliminary Plat application, a separate legal description is required
for the
boundaries of the plat, excludine property to the section line
) rRecorded warranty deed for the subject property as required for annexations/rezones. u jlt-l
x Affidavit of Legal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner (If owner is a corporation,
'submit a copy ofthe Articles of Incorporation or other evidence to show that the person signing
is an authorized aeent.) ,,/
), .Sc4led vicinity map showing the location of the subject property L/
.Provide concept plan (Roads, access points, parking, general
layout ofbuildings and building elevations.) ,-/
Y , Pre-application meeting notes (All
applications that require a public hearing are required to conducr a pre-
application ' Neighborhood meeting meeting with the Planning sign-in Depanment.sheet (Applicants ) are required to hold a neighborhood meering ro provide "/'
\an opportunity fqlpublic review of the proposed project prior to the submitral of an application.) 1./
A Commitment of Property Posting form signed by the applicant/agent t/
Fee (Please call Planning Department to calculate correct fee. Applications
with
incomect fees will not be accepted.)
,.,'
Applicant
({) Description
Staff
({)
t'lM
If this application is not accompanied by a plat, conditional use permit, or planned unit
development application, submit a conceptual development plan and elevations for the
property (also submit an electronic version of the plan(s) in pdf format on a disk with the file named
with proiect name & plan type [i.e.
conceptual development plan, elevationsl).
Ol,ft DIAN \r7 Planning Department
IDAHO PRELIMINARY PLAT I Application Checklist
name
All applications are required to contain one copy of the following:
Note: Only one copy of the above items need be submitted when submitting multiple applications
Additional Requirements for Preliminary Plat Applications:
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 o Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile:
(208) 888-6854 o Website: www.meridiancity.org
(Rev.6/022011)
-.tlttt/
1) File #:
Applicant
({) Description
Staff
ril
X Completed & signed Commission & Council Review Application ,-/
I Narrative lully describing the proposed project 1./
x Legal description of the subject property (Lot, Block, and Subdivision name if located in a recorded
subdivision OR a metes and bounds legal description of the property if not in a subdivision.) ,/
K Recorded warranty deed for the sub.ject property /t ;i l,/ .
X Affidavit of Legal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner (If owner is a
colporation,
submit a copy of the Articles of Incorporation or other evidence to show that the person signing is an authorized agent.) u/
X Scaled vicinity map showing the location of the subject property L/
K Pre-application meeting notes (All applications that require a public hearing are required to conduct a pre-
application meeting with the Planning Department.)
\ Neighborhood meeting sign-in sheet (Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meering to provide
an opportunity for publiq
X Commitment of Property ryyiew Posting of the proposed form signed project prior by the to the applicanUagent submittal of an application.) ,r/
Fee (Please call Planning Department to calculate correct fee.
Applications with
inqorrect fees will not
be accepted.)
Applicant
r{l
Description Staff
({)
x
Include the following additional information in the project narrative:
the ordinance describing the particular provision, the variance requested, and the
reason thereof
(e.g., largqr rear setback to buffer adjoining properties, etc.)
\( Approval of the proposed subdivision name from the Ada County Surveyor's office
I Preliminary Plat-*l copy (folded to 8Vz" x 11" size)
The items must be included on the preliminary plat: 1r/
D ( . Proposed subdivision name
(Do nor use numbers in preliminary plat names.)
D a
Drafting date
D ( o Section location and county (situate statement)
L a
North arrow
o Scale (not less than l"=100')
I ( Name, address and phone number ofowner(s), applicant, and engineer, surveyor or
planner who prepared the preliminary plat
v Proposed site(s) for parks, playgrounds, schools, churches or other public
\' uses
I v o Proposed qommon area lots and/or landscape easements
l-/
)
a Streets, street names, rights-of-way and roadway widths, including adjoining streets
or roadways (details on plan)
, Proposed and existing lot lines and blocks showing scaled dimensions and numbers
of each
a Legend of symbols
4A) a Minimum residential house size (for R-2 and R-4 zones only)
x
Contour lines shown at 5' intervals where land slope is greater than ll%o and at2'
intervals where land slope is lOVo or less, referenced to an established benchmark,
including location and elevation
),
Any dedications to the public and easements together with a statement of location,
Isuch a dimensions Floodplain boundary and purposes as determined of by FEMA or measures to amend this boundary
A a Stub streets to provide access to adjacent undeveloped land or existing roadways
a Block faces not more than seven hundred fifty feet (750') in length without an
intersecting, street or alley (residential districts only)
D
a Block lengths not greater than thirteen hundred feet (1,300') without
a pedestrian
connectiOn (residential districts only)
D a
Cul-de-sac lengths not in excess of450'
! lReduction of the preliminary plat (8 Vz" x ll")
x
Landscape plan -
*l copy (folded to 8Yz" x I l" size)
Plan must have a scale no smaller than l" = 50' (I"
= 20' is preferued) and be on a standard drawing
sheet, not to exceed 36" x 48" (24" x 36" is prefered). A plan which cannot be drawn in its entirety
on a single sheet must be drawn with appropriate match lines on hro or ntore sheets.
The following items must be included on the Iandscape plan:
,./
x a Date, scale, north arrow, and prolect name
Y
a Names, addresses, and telephone numbers ofthe developer and the person and/or
firm preparing the plan
V.
a Existing natural features such as canals, creeks, drains, ponds, wetlands,
floodplains, high groundwater areas, and rock outcroppings.
K
a Location, size, and species of all existing trees on site with trunks 4 inches or
greater in diameter, measured 6 inches above the ground. Indicate whether the tree
will be retained or removed.
s a A statement of how existing healthy trees proposed to be retained will be protected
from damage during construction
)r
a Existing buildings, structures, planting areas, Iight poles, power poles, walls,
fences, berms, parking and loading areas, vehicular drives, trash areas, sidewalks,
pathways, stormwater detention areas, signs, street furniture, and other man-made
elements.
x a Existing and proposed contours for all areas steeper than207o slope. Berms shall
be shown with one-foot contours.
) a Sight Triangles as defined in I 1-3A-5 of this ordinance.
x a Proposed landscaping
* a Proposed screening structures
$
a Calculations of project components to demonstrate compliance with the
requirements of this ordinance, including:
> Width of street buffers, lineal feet of street frontage, and number of street trees
!r I
Supplementary information at the discretion of the Director or City Engineer may be required to sfficiently detail
the proposed development within any special development area, including but not limited to hillside, planned unit
development, Jloodplain, cemetery, manufoctured home parks, and/or hazardous or unique
areas of development.
*Once an application is accepted, staffwill contact you to let you
know how many additional copies of plans are
required. All plans are required to be fukled
to 8 /2" x I I " size.
APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL APPUCABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKUST ARE
SUBMITTED. THIS APPUCATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE (NOR WILL A PTJBLIC
HEARING BE SET) UNTILSTAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION.
v-
Written confirmation that a traffic impact study is not required and/or has been submitted for
review to ACHD. Please contact Mindy Wallace at387-6178 or Christy Little at 387-6144
for more information.
4tv K xmaterials Conceptual Electronic Submit two Submittal elevations (2) sets of of (conceptual Separate proposed disks engineering struclures, required) including plans building
t-l^ I
(l) Disk with electronic version of the conceptual engineering plans in a format
that complies with the Specifications for Project Drawings found at:
http://www.meridiancity.org/public works/autocad standards/index.asp
x
(l) Electronic version of the preliminary plat & landscape plan in pdf format submitted
on a disk with the files named with project name & plan type (i.e. preliminary plat,
landscape plan, etc.). We encourage you to also submit at least one color version for
presenta4on purposes.
-/
,il/t
M, ID Planning Department
IDAHO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Application Checklist
ect name
All applications are required to contain one copy of the following
Note: Only one copy of the above items need be submitted when submitting multiple applications.
THIS APPLICATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL
REQUIRED INFORMATION.
PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATIINS MUST BE C)MPLETE AS oF JUNE ] 5TH AND
DECEMBER ISTH.
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 o Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o
Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 o
Website: www.meridiancity.org
(Rev. 11/4fr8)
-7
J
tV-zral
(/n- File #: -tz
Applicant
r{l
Requirements for Text & Map Amendments
Staff
r{l
and Commission & Council Review
x Narrative fully describing the proposed request
growth and development of the city
support this request
lr/
x Pre-application meeting notes (All applications that require a public hearing are required to conducr a
pre-
application meeting with the Planning Department.) ,/
Fee
Additional Requirements for Map Amendments Lr'
x. Include the following additional information in the narrative:
F Development intentions for any land involved
lr/
,>
.Neighborhood meeting sign-in sheet (Applicants
are required to hold a neighborhood meeting to provide
'an opportunity
&fpUblic review of the proposed pro.lect prior to the submittal of an application.) t/
t> ,_Recorded warranty deed for the subject property
I
,> .,Afhdavit of Legal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner
(If owner is a corporation,
submit a copy of the Articles of Incorporation or other evidence tg show that the person signing is an authorized agent.) ,r/
D A iCommitment Scaled vicinity ofProperty map showing Posting the location form signed of the by subject the applicant/property agent t/
>/
ttlpAmendments Include the following eaAitional additional information nequiremem in the fo{q4t narrative:
) Underline and strikeout changes for text amendments .D/,f
,(
Community Development
Department
IDIAN
v
Land Development Services
Meridian City Hall, Suite 102
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, Idaho 83642
TO: Mayor Tammy de Weerd
Members of the City Council
FROM: Denny Cline
DATE: 12/s/73
SUBJECT: Sewer Easement - Woodburn West Subdivision No,
1
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION
A. Move to:
1. Approve a Sewer Main Easement for the City of Meridian, located in a
future phase of Woodburn West Subdivision,
2. This easement provides the City of Meridian access to a pubtic sewer main
installed to provide service for a future phase, west of woodburn west
Subdivision No. 1-.
3. Authorize the IVlayor to sign the easement, and the City clerk to attest.
II. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS
B ruce Chatterton, Com m u nity Development Director
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager
Denny Cline, Development Analyst ll
BB4-5533
489-0362
489-037t
Recommending
Approval
'b*^-, PJI;*,
Denny Cline, Der,€lopment Analyst Il
Bruce Deve lopment Services lVlanager
Ph: 208.887.2211 www. meridiancitv.orq Fax 2OB.BB7.t297
Rev:01/2013
v
t
Dev e I opment Se rv i c e s D epartm ent
hh
eor..*"rT"etfr ,a"";.*
ProjecUFile:
Lead Agency:
Site address:
Commission
Hearing:
Woodburn West Subdivision
This is a comprehensive plan amendment, rezone, and preliminary plat application to
subdivide 25.8 acres into 99 single family residential lots and 16 common lots. The
site is located west of Venable Lane and north of Ustick Road in Meridian, ldaho.
City of Meridian
1250 W. Ustick Road
1
XXXX,2012
Staff Approval: September XX,2012
Applicant: Northside Management
Scott Noriyuki
6810 Fairhill
Boise, lD 83714
Staff Contact: tvlindy Wallace
Phone: 387-6178
E-mail:
mwal lace@achdidaho. orq
Tech Review: XXXX,2012
A. Findinqs of Fact
Description of Application: The applicant is requesting approval of a comprehensive plan
amendment, rezone, and preliminary plat application to subdivide 25.8 acres into 99 single
family residential lots and 16 common lots.
2. Descri of Surrou Area:
3. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application.
4. lmpact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any
building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in
effect at that time.
1
Direction Land Use Zoning
North School/Single family residential R-4/R-8
South Rural Urban Transition RUT
East Sinqle family residential R-8
West Rural Urban Transition RUT
DRAFT Woodburn West
5. Capital !mprovements Plan (ClP)/Five Year Work Plan (FYWP):
The following improvements are scheduled in the District's Five Year Work Plan
Ustick Road is scheduled in the Five Year Work Plan to be widened to S-lanes from Linder to
N/eridian Road. This project is currently in preliminary development and is planned to occur in
2017.
The intersection of Meridian and Ustick is scheduled in the Five Year Work Plan to be widened
to S-lanes on the north leg, 6-lanes on the south, 7-lanes east, and 7-lanes on the west leg, and
reconstructed/sig nalize d in 201 7 .
B. Traffic Findinqs for Consideration
Trip Generation (if TIS not required): This development is estimated to generate 927 additional
vehicle trips per day (20 existing); 92 additional vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak
hour (2
existing), based on the lnstitute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th edition.
2. Condition of Area Roadways
Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH)
Roadway Frontage Functional
Classification
PM Peak
Hour
Traffic Count
PM Peak
Hour Level
of Service
Existing
Plus
Project
Ustick Road 173-feet
Principal
Arterial
661
Better than
E
Better than
tr
Woodpine 5O-feet Local
N/A N/A N/A
Applepine 5Ojeet Local
N/A N/A N/A
Anfield 50-feet Local N/A
N/A N/A
* Acceptable level of service for a three-lane principal
arterial is "E" (880 VPH).
3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT)
Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts.
. The average daily traffic count for Ustick Road west of lvleridian Road was 13,101 on
C. Findinqs 8t1t12. for Gonsideration
a
a
1
2 DRAFT Woodburn West
1. Ustick Road
a. Existing Conditions: Ustick Road is improved with 2-travel lanes, 42 to 27-feet of pavement,
and no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. There is 74-feet of right-of-way for Ustick
Road (2S-feet from centerline).
b. Policy:
Arterial Roadway Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken
to all of the adjacent streets.
Master Street Map and Typology Policy: District Policy 7205.5 states that the design of
improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, including the [Vaster
Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide. The developer or engineer should contact the
District before starting any design.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Width Policy: District Policies 7205.2.1 & 7205.5.2 state
that the standard 7-lane street section shall be g6-feet
(back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within
120-feet of right-of-way. This width typically accommodates three travel lanes in each
direction, a continuous raised or landscaped median with intermittent turn lanes, and safety
shoulders.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Width Policy: District Policies 7205.2.1 & 7205.5.2 state
that the standard 5-lane street section shall be 72-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within
96-feet of right-of-way. This width typically accommodates hvo travel lanes in each direction, a
continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes on a minor arterial and a safety shoulder on a
principal arterial.
Street Section and Right-of Way Width Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 & 7205.5.2 states
that the standard 3-lane street section shall be 46-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within 70
feet of right-otway. This width typically accommodates a single travel lane in each direction,
a continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes.
Right-of-Way Dedication: District Policy 7205.2 states that The District will provide
compensation for additional right-of-way dedicated beyond the existing righlof-way along
arterials listed as impact fee eligible in the adopted capital lmprovements plan
using available
impact fee revenue in the lmpact Fee Service Area.
No compensation will be provided for righlof-way on an arterial that is not listed as impact fee
eligible in the Capital lmprovements Plan.
The District may acquire additional righlof-way beyond the site-related needs to preserve a
corridor for future capacity improvements, as provided in Section 7300.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7205.5.7 requires a concrete sidewalks at least s-feet wide to
be constructed on both sides of all arterial streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide
between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased
safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter
width policy if trees are to
be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next
to the back-of-curb shall be a
minimum of 7-feet wide.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Ivleandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public
sidewalks are placed outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge ofthe sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.).
ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 31 1 1 .1 requires the l\ilaster Street Map
(MSNI) guide the righlof-way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway
features required through development. This segment of Ustick Road is designated in the
MSM as a Residental Arterial with s-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 72-foot street section
within 96-feet of right-of-way.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant isn't proposing any improvements to Ustick Road
abutting the site.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal does not meet District Policy
and should not be approved, as proposed. Consistent with the IVISI\/ and Five Year Work
Plan the applicant should be required to dedicate 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of
3 DRAFT Woodburn West
2
Ustick Road abutting the site. Additionally, the applicant should be required to construct a 5-
foot wide detached concrete sidewalk located a minimum of 42-feel from the centerline of
Ustick Road abutting the site.
lnternal Local Streets
a. Existing Conditions: There are no internal local streets within the site.
b. Policy:
Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is
taken to all of the adjacent streets.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that righlof-way
widths for all local streets shall generally not be less than So-feet wide and that the standard
street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). The District will consider the
utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval.
Standard Urban Local Street-36-foot to 33-foot Street Section and Right-of-way policy:
District Policy 7207 .5.2 states that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to
back-of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This
street section shall include curb, gutter, and minimum S-foot concrete sidewalks on both sides
and shall typically be within SoJeet of right-of-way.
The District will also consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire
department approval. Most often this width is a 33-foot street section (back-of-curb to back-
of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size.
Continuation of Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.2.4 states that an existing street, or a
street in an approved preliminary plat, which ends at a boundary of a proposed development
shall be extended in that development. The e)dension shall include provisions for continuation
of storm drainage facilities. Benefits of connectivity include but are not limited to the following:
o Reduces vehicle miles traveled.
. lncreases pedestrian and bicycle connectivity.
. lncreases access for emergency services.
. Reduces need for additional access points to the arterial street system
o Promotes the efficient delivery of services including trash, mail and deliveries.
o Promotes appropriate intra-neighborhood traffic circulation to schools, parks,
neighborhood commercial centers, transit stops, etc.
o Promotes orderly development.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete sidewaik is
required on both sides of all local street, except those in rural developments with net densities
of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot
frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street. Some
local jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks.
The sidewalk may be placed ne)d to the back-of-curb. Where feasible, a parkway
strip at least
8-feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to
provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the
planting of trees in
accordance with the District's Tree Planting Policy. lf no trees are to be planted in the
parkway strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification,
to reduce
the width of the parkway strip.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the ad.jacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
4 DRAFT Woodburn West
3
A permanent righlof-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are
placed outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.).
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to extend 3 stub street to provide access
to the site; Woodpine, Apple Pine, and Anfield. The applicant is proposing to construct all of
the internal streets as a 34-foot street section with curb, gutter, and s-foot wide attached
concrete sidewalks within sO-feet of right-of-way. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to
construct 2 knuckles.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meet's District policy and
should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should be requtred to provide written Fire
Department approval for the use of the reduced street section prior to plan approval.
Driveways
Ustick Road
a. Existing Conditions: There is one existing 2o-foot wide full access driveway from the site
onto Ustick Road, located approximately gsjeet east of the west
property line and
approximately 21O-feet east of NW 12b Street (measured centerline to centerline).
b. Policy
Access Points Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with
development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section
and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is
being considered by the lead land use agency. Approved access points may be relocated
and/or restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops.
Access Policy: District policy 7205.4.7 states that direct access to principal arterials is
typically prohibited. lf a property has frontage on more than one street, access shall be taken
from the street having the lesser functional classification. lf it is necessary to take access to
the higher classified street due to a lack of frontage, the minimum allowable spacing shall be
based on Table 1b under District policy 7205.4.7, unless a waiver for the access point has
been approved by the District Commission. Driveways, when approved on a principal arterial
shall operate as a right-in/right-out only, and the District will require the construction of a
raised median to restrict the left turning movements.
Driveway Location Policy: District policy 7205.4.7 requires driveways located on principal
arterial roadways to be located a minimum of 355-feet from the nearest intersection for a right-
in/right-out only driveway. Full-access driveways are not allowed on principal arterial
roadways.
Successive Driveways: District policy 7205.4.7 Table 1b, requires driveways located on
principal arterial roadways with a speed limit of 40 I\/PH to align or offset a minimum of 400-
feet from any existing or proposed driveway.
Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7205.4.8 restricts high-volume driveways (100 VTD or
more) to a maximum width of 36-feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 WD) to a
maximum width of 30-feet. Curb return type driveways with 3o-foot radii will be required for
high-volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 1s-foot radii
will be required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 VTD.
Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance
problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. ln accordance with District policy,
7205.4.8, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-
feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers in
accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7205.4.8.
5 DRAFT Woodburn West
Temporary Access Policy: District Policy 7202.4.2 identifies a temporary access as that
which "is permitted for use until appropriate alternatjve access becomes available".
Temporary access may be granted through a development agreement or similar method, and
the developer shall be responsible for providing a financial guarantee for the future closure of
the driveway.
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to maintain and continue to use the
existing 2o-foot wide full access driveway to access the existing single-family home and cell
phone tower on the lot (lot 6). A stub street from the north is provided to this parcel.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal does not meet District
Access Managemenl, Successive Driveway, Driveway Location, Width, however, staff
recommends a modification of policy to allow the existing 2o-foot wide full access driveway to
remain as a temporary driveway due to the fact that the driveway provides access to an
existing single family home and cell phone tower, which are low trip generators.
Staff
recommends that the driveway be closed in the future when the lot redevelops and access to
Lot 6 come from NW 1th Street.
The applicant should be required to pave the driveway its entire width at least 3o-feet into the
site beyond the edge of pavement.
Stub Streets
a. Existing Conditions: There are 3 existing stubs to the site; Woodpine, Apple Pine, and
Anfleld.
b. Policy:
Stub Street Policy: District policy 7207.2.4 states that stub streets will be required to provide
circulation or to provide access to adjoining properties. Stub streets will conform with the
requirements described in Section 7207.2.5.4, except a temporary cul-de-sac will not be
required if the stub street has a length no greater than 1so-feet. A sign shall be installed at
the terminus of the stub street statrng that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED lN THE
FUTURE.'
ln addition, stub streets must meet the following conditions:
. A stub street shall be designed to slope towards the nearest street intersection within the
proposed development and drain surface water towards that intersectiont unless an
alternative storm drain system is approved by the District.
. The District may require appropriate covenants guaranteeing that the stub street will
remain free of obstructions.
Temporary Dead End Streets Policy: District policy 7207.2.4 requires that the design and
construction for cul-de-sac streets shall apply to temporary dead end streets. The temporary
cul-de-sac shall be paved and shall be the dimensional requirements of a standard cul-de-sac.
The developer shall grant a temporary turnaround easement to the District for those portions
of the cul-de-sac which extend beyond the dedicated street right-of-way. ln the instance
where a temporary easement extends onto a buildable lot, the entire lot shall be encumbered
by the easement and identified on the plat as a non-buildable lot until the street is extended,
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to extend the 3 existing stub streets into the
site; Woodpine, Apple Pine, and Anfield. The applicant is proposing to construct 3 stub
streets. One to the west and two to the south. The stub street are proposed to be located as
follows:
. Stub street to the south, Cooper Avenue, located approximately 320-feet south of
Woodpine Street (measured centerline to centerline).
6 DRAFT Woodburn West
4.
. Stub street to the south, NW 11th Avenue, located approximately 280-feet east of the
west property line (measured property line to centerline).
. Stub street to the west, Sandal Wood Drive, located approximately 540-feet south of the
north property line (measured property line to centerline).
None of the proposed stub streets extend greater than
'1so-feet in length.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meet's District policy and
should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the
terminus of all 3 stub streets stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED lN THE
FUTURE,'
5. Bridge Crossing for the White Drain
The District will require that the applicant submit the bridge plans for the crossing of the White
Drain (Sandal Wood Drive and NW 11th Avenue) for review and approval prior to plan approval.
6. Tree Planters
Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in
planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class ll trees may be
allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class lll trees may be allowed
in planters with a minimum width of 1o-feet.
7. Landscaping
Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD
rightof-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 1o-feet from all public
storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision
triangle at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 4o-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot
height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a so-foot offset
from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all
District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans.
D. Site Specific Gonditions of Approva!
Dedicate 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustick Road abutting the site. The righlof-
way purchase and sale agreement and deed must be completed and signed by the applicant prior
to scheduling the final plat for signature by the ACHD Commission or prior to
jssuance of a
building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days
to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The District will
purchase the righlof-way which is in addition to existing right-of-way from available Corridor
Preservation Funds.
Construct a s-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk located a minimum of 42-feet from the
centerline of Ustick Road abutting the site. Provide a permanent righlof-way easement if public
sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way.
Construct all of the internal local streets as a 34-foot street section with curb, gutter, and s-foot
wide attached concrete sidewalks within so-feet of right-of-way, as proposed.
Construct 2 knuckles, as proposed.
Construct one stub street to the south, Cooper Avenue, located approximately 320-feet south of
Woodpine Street, as proposed. install a sign at the terminus of all 3 stub streets stating that,
"THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE,'
1
2
3
4.
I
7 DRAFT Woodburn West
1
2
.,
5. Construct one stub street to the south, NW 'l'lh Avenue, located approximately 280-feet east of
the west property line, as proposed. lnstall a sign at the terminus of all 3 stub streets stating that,
,.THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE."
7. Construct one stub street to the west, Sandal Wood Drive, located approximately 540-feet south
ofthe north property line, as proposed. lnstall a sign at the terminus of all 3 stub streets stating
that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED lN THE FUTURE."
8. Submit the bridge plans for the crossing of the White Drain (Sandal Wood Drive) for review and
approval prior to plan approval.
9. Payment of impacts fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit.
10. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
E. Standard Conditions of Approval
Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way.
Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD righfof-
way.
ln accordance with District policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any
existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements The aoolicant's enoineer should provide
documentation of A compliance to District DeveloDment R ew staff for review
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged
during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at
387-6280 (with file number) for details.
5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all
landscaping proposed within ACHD righ!of-way or easement areas.
6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall
be borne by the developer.
7. lt is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way.
The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant.
The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business
days prior to breakjng ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD
Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are
compromised during any phase of construction.
8. Utility street cuts in pavemenl less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in
writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file
numbers) for details.
9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISpWC
Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable
ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of
ldaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy.
11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in
writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an
authorized representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain
written confirmation of any change from ACHD.
8 DRAFT Woodburn West
1
2
'12. lf the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the
site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time.
Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall
require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in
place at that time unless a waiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is
granted by the ACHD Commission.
F. Gonclusions of Law
The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval
are satisfied.
ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the
proposed development.
G ttachments
4.Council 5. 2.ttlap 3.Plan 1, Vicinity Site Request Utility Development Coordinating for Reconsideration Process Checklist Guidelines
9 DRAFT Woodburn West
v
10 DRAFT Woodburn West
Ir 'i-
.j
::
\
dr
:':t:j\'
+?R::
,: .x
ltt,
ff<
'1
Ada County Utility Coordinating Council
Developer/Local lm provement District
Right of Way lmprovements Guideline Request
Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway
and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process.
1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way
improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected
utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include
but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated
construction dates, and any portrons critical to the right of way improvements and coordination
of utilities.
2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with
preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of
utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the
utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting
the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary
for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal,
adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the
developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its
facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the
plan review conference.
3) Revisions: The developer rs responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary
plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the
preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days
after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon.
4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with
final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the
anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be
performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall
schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity
shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless
otherwise agreed upon.
Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit
iducc.com for e-mail notification information.
1'l DRAFT Woodburn West
Development Process Checklist
Items Completed to Date:
Xsubmit a development application to a City or to Ada County
XThe City or the County will transmit the deveiopment application to ACHD
XThe ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review
ffilThe Planning Review Section will do qle of the following:
XSend a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at
this time.
Xwrite a Stafi Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
Xwrite a commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system
and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
Items to be completed by Applicant:
EFor ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter:
. The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development
Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements
required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact
fee assessment.)
. The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services
(ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-
way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
EPay lmpact Fees prior to issuance of building permit.
lmpact fees cannot be paid priorto plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER
Con struction ( N on -S u b div i sions)
! Driveway or Property Approach(s)
. Submit a "Driveway Approach Requesf form to ACHD Construction (for
approval by Development Services & Traffic
Services). There is a one week turnaround forthis approval.
n Working in the ACHD Right.of-Way
. Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a 'Temporary
Highway Use permit
Application'to ACHD Construction -
a) b)Plan Traffic An Erosion Control & Sediment Control Permits Narrative along with: & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or
you
are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Con st ruction ( S u b d iv i sion s)
E Sediment & Erosion Submittal
. At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Construction lvleeting an Erosion
& Sediment Control Narrative & Plan,
done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be tumed into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD
Stormwater Section.
E ldaho Power Company
. Vic Steelman at ldaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con
being
scheduled.
! Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling a. Pre-Con.
12 DRAFT Woodburn West
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant
of the final decision made by the ROWDS l4anager when it is alleged that the ROWDS
Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts
presented, made an error of Fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and
capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy l4anual.
Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be
charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative
costs.
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with
the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working
days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of
appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name,
address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The
grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy
relevant
to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written
argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice
of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS lvlanager shall have ten (10) working days from the
date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and
may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may
also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the
reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the
appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of
the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular
meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant
of the ROWDS lYanager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision
being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the
Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing.
Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either afflrm
or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the
decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and
evidence presented at the hearing.
1
a
e
13 DRAFT Woodburn West
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD
staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request
reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action
previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and
materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties.
a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevatling side can move for
reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on
by all Commissioners present.
lf a motion to reconsider is made and seconded itis subject to a motion to postpone to
a
certain time.
b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no
later than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular
meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon
receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda
for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting.
The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting
forth new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed
situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information
establishing an error of fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be
supported by oral testimony at the meeting.
d. lf a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position
it
occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to
ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at
which the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the
original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides.
At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action,
interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the
President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may
take any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable.
f. lf a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to
cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission.
c
14 DRAFT Woodburn West
1.
s AN ITAR:Y*$FIYEIL L,\SES,I
ENT
THIS ${DINTURE, made this " .day of_,Z0_getween 8fi4 f,;sc- tko
v
parties of the first part, anri hereinatler
Idaho, the pafly of the second part, and
called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County,
hereinafter called the Grantce;
WIT}'IESSETH
WI-IEREAS, lhe Grantors desire to provide a sanit4lr sewer right=of-*:ay acrcrss the premisas
and propeffy hereinafter particularly bou:rdecl and described; and
WHEREAS, the s*nitary sewer is to be provitied for through an underground pipeline to be
consrnrcted by others; and
WHERSAS, it will be necessary lo maintain and servicE said pipeline frorn time to time by
the Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the berrefits to be received hy the Granrors, and
other good and vaiuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto
the Grantee the right"of-way for an easemeflt for the operalion and maintenancc of a sewer
line over and across the f:oliowing described property:
(SEE ATTACHED EXi{lBI'f A and B)
The:easemeflt herehy granted is for the purpose of construction *nd operation of a sanitary
server line and their allied faciliiies, together witl"i their maintenance, repair and replacement
at the convenience ofthe Crantee, with the free right of access to sucir facilities at any anil ali
times.
fr0 HAVE AND ?O HOLD, tire saicl easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee. it's
successors ard assigns forever-
iT'IS EXPRESSLY LIIDERSTOOD ,AND A.GREED, by and between the parties hereto,
that afler making repairs or petfomring other maintenance, Grantee shall reslore the area of
the easement and adjacent properry to that existert prior to undertaking such repairs and
maintenance. I{owever, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing orrestoring
anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation
of this easernent,
THE *RANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will noi place or allorv lo be
placed
any permanent structures, uees2 brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within ihe area
Sewer Main Easemenl [ASI\,1T.S1VR
I
described for this easement, .,,vhich wor.lld interfele with the use of said
easement, for the
purposes stated herein.
THE GRANTORS hereby. coveilant and agree with the Graatee that should any part of the
right-ot:-way and ea$enrent hereby granted shall becorue part of; or lie within the'boundaries
of any public'streel, then, to sueh extent, such rigi*-of-rvay and easement hereby granted
which lies within sueh boundar,v lhereof or r+'hich is a part thereot, shal I cease a*d become
null and void and of no funher effect and shall be completely relinquished.
THE GI{ANTOR.S do hereby covenant with ihe Granree that rhey are larrfully seized and
possessed of,the aforernentioned and described tract of land, and that they havc a good and
laivftll right to conv$,v said easement, and that they *'il[ warrant and forever defbud the ritie
and quiet possession thereof against the larvful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WTTNESS WHER-EOF, the said p*rties of the lirst part have hereunto subscribed their
siguatures the first herein above written.
lq11 G. Orrrrtal Ed rvtr;dia^,Ib tSbq r
Secretary
STATE 0FIDAHO )
)ss
County of Ada )
Secretaqy, respectively, of the corporarion that executed the within instrumenl, and
acknowledged to rne that such corporation executed the same.
IN WITI{ESS WHER"$OF,I have hereunto set my hand and af'fixed my official seal the da1'
and year fist above written.
A,
ttOTARt' Y PUBLIC
6o4
V\
,-1- LLs,-Lk
*
Punltc
*
Commission Expires
EASMl"SWR
Fresjdent
On nh. l5
Public^in and fbr said State,
Arln',- Voll.*-
personally appeared
kno'*.n or identified to to be the President and
J\/ \.1
GRANTEE: CITY GF MtrRTDIAN
de Weerd,
Approved By City Council Ont
STATE OF rDAI-{O )
coturty of Ada j
*
On this day of__*- ,2A_, before me, the unde.rsigned, a Notary
Fublic in,and for'said'State, personally appeared TAMMY DE WEERD and JAYCEE L.
I"IOLMAN, known to me to be the Mayorand City Clerk, respectively, of rhe City of lvleridian,
ldaho, and who executed the u;ithin instrument, and acknowledged to ms that the City of
X,leridian executed the sqnxe,
IN WITNESS WI-IEREOF, I have hereunto set n:y han<t and affixed my official seai rhe day arid
3,ear
first above written.
(sEAL) Residing at:
Comrnission iixpires:_
Sewer N1ain Easement EASMT.SWR
EXFiIAIT A
DE$CRIPTION FOR
CITY OF M5*I$IAN SfiWER EAS.EMENT
WOODBUBN WEST SUBDIVISION NO. 1
A utitity easement localed in the SW 1i4 of $ection 36, T.4N., R. 1W., B.fU.,
Meridian, Ada County, ldaha, more particularly ciescribed as folfows:
Cornmencing at a brass cap monurnent mcrking the SW corner of said Section
36 from which a brass cap monumerl rnarking the $ 114 corner of said Section 36
bears South 88"43'02" East, 2662.29 feet; Thence North 53"49'52" East, 1506.i5 feet;
Thence North 14"45'42" West, 203,34 feet; Thence North 72'30'04' East, 49,42 feet;
Thence North 18"14'40'i West, 23,16 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence $outh 71 "45'20" West, 4-4.32 i.aet;
Thence North 18"14'40" West, 20.00 feet;
Thence North 71"45'20' East, 44,22 feet;
Thence South 18"1440" East, 20.00 feet to the REAL POINT CIF BEG[NNING.
Gontaining 884 square feet, more or less.
\/
I
c rc 25 50 100 20C
SCAL-E: ni"
: i00'
p
S
nr
a qJ \
\ _s*
\/-
\3i
;LF-i !
2\
\
Flt ot
. -l
F-l
a
)-)
<*-
-{
\--*
.*i9
sqll;te
r="\r,, o,
vu sa8'+l'02"f
4N.,
?tr
I.
)
S
BEAR;NG
s3,6 /4
S1
R. 1W.
++..) e |.;:1iij{'ro*fit liT
s,tnTs 13t
.$l!EAlDi;r8} {N, lgA+ir"r {:9,(,
s*s,gsrrt
w
;j l! j:, r, U.r
IDAHO
SURVEY
GROUP, P"C. +ns. DA'rE
1C-.11-1I
I LTiYL5 l!:1tr T:I ADl
-UUI
LII\ L BIAR]NC LLI\(:rl-l
L1 N 7?'30'04" f 49.42'
L2 Ft !8'14'1.C" W ,1.) i t':
L3 s 71'45',20" W +4.22'
L4 N 18'14'4C" W 2C.CI0'
N 71"45'2c" t 4+.22',
Lb s 1s''14'40" r 2C"00'
OF
I r
J t"tii
72
JcB Ni}.
t?-r3f
EASTMENT
ltt tonr,/ lvt r n
6vt
City of Meridian Development Review
Agency Comments Meeting
Date: Date of List:
Project Name: uh
Fire sentative:
Notes:
A B C D
2 3 4 5 6 7 (e) 9 10 11 13 15 16 t7 18 20
2l 22 23 25 26 28 29 30 31 32 33 J+ 36 37 38 39 40
41 42 44 45 46 48
Police sentative:
Notes: - or c 0 O v,.
A B C D E
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
a
Vt Z
sentative:
Notes: o t . ^-^
A B C
1 2 3
Parks entative:
N - d\P
Public Works
Notes:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 t7 18 19 20
2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Rev. 6/6/12
entatlve:
Planner:
1 t2 t4 19
35
43 49
--T_- tt
[T-
f r-ft
97 98
--T--
--T-l
+
6 46 47 79 80 81 -rlTt 84 85
L
14 f-15 T 16 -t-[r
4{,t{ft ttt,'frtJra*x-l t
t
-[/,,bmit ff "tf "t / uPJar'J nZ t
wilf neeJ ar'df'/ crFi€s 4 Pl"+ 4-0
+ft- I
,|
*ry r
n0,</ rP /-<'il
Ct-rt* q nZ * aPfl +c 3rd -[/trr
itt*
^
1 '/R-ry,/(t
-n_nl-1.L 12" "f
XAZ Pc',/ r( '{ z-32 >; '"fr fr" tr4
/0r+
,@n I /7*/
.rlq ZJ
Daily Planning Application Receipts
DATE: 06lo4.12013
01-1910-32290-0000
Applicant Application Name Description lnvoice Check Amount
Jason Smith Kona Grill Certificate of Zoning Compliance with Prior
Approval
23008 196 $173.00
Jason Smith Kona Grill Administrative Design Review 23009 196 $173.00
Janet Christensen Adecco Limited Duration Sign 23064 1425045 $27.00
Scott Roberts Sleep Train Certificate of Zoning Compliance Verification 23073 13360 $53.00
Sub-total for Account 01-1910-32290-0000: $426.00
TorAL Recprs: $+Z0.oo
Exhibit A.6: Conceptual Building Elevations
Fd ma$nry (stu@, bri€{ stoe)
d o{age wing colomns d porch
@lumB.
lrGfiry vere@ to wrap 24" @
ffi.
Additbnal ma6qry ffit bolqi
rind@ d @ porch
@lum9 whcG
apglicablo.
Full mffry (rt@, bli*, siom)
al0aa0g wing @bons d pordr @fumns.
M(sryrcEtorap24"cl
@llw.
Mditimal monry a@nt belry
windoE q
@ porch @lumE wiec
Bppli€blc.
Ful llr.@ry (dlr@. bd.*, !tom)
at 9*{6 wiE @loirm d pon*l 6lumm.
,r*rymbW24'@
@EE,
Addtihd ltm.yadbalor
windm o O porh
@lumB rh€€
.pdi€bh.
Full mffiry (stu@, brick, stof,6)
at gsEg" wim cobmns or pordr 6lumm.
Mo$rry veffitowp 24" @
6re8.
AddilioBl llrffiry
windffs c @ 'cstbGlw
porch @lumB wheE
appla€bb
Full masonry (ifucco, brick, stone)
at garage wing colomn3 or porch columns.
Mosonry veners lo wrap2q' @
6m€8.
Additional masonry accent below
windows or @ pordr
colunms where
applicabl€.
Fut'll.sry(a@, biict.m)
at !6aaCa uirig @blm ff pordr
@lumi
ttleryffibf{2{@
ffi,
AddHo.El lffiry a@nt bdovr
wirdffidC pddrofullmwh@
epplb*b
lr lit rt lr
ll la tl tt tl tt rr tl
!! !! !! r!
tl II,TI tI
Lr r_!
tl' tI I tl t!-E !tr! --: , I
= L! !!l
Woodburn West CPAM- I 2-007 ; AZ-13 -003;
PP- 13-007 PAGE 20
_f
Ir
II
IE
tIg!
I il I
n,[lrl
Fullmry (dl@, b** !tm)
al9a,80s wlng @bmt or pordr @llmr.
Mffiry vqeE io wnp 24' C,
m.
AdditoEl llmry .q{ b.ld
undo6 oa O poadr @lulrm wh@
89pli:$lo.
Ful lrenry (.ttE, b,ir( 1o0.)
at garagE ui t9 cobm! or pordr @llmt.
Msnry veneB to mp 2/l: @
com[.
AdditimalrEsry a@otbclfl
windffiq@ porch@llmwhe
.pplkEbb.
Ful malonry (stucco, baick, stono)
at gerego whg cobmE o{ porch columnE.
Masdly v€noor8 lo wrap 24'@
@msaa.
Addruonsl mesonry accent below
windorw or (o pordr @lumng where
apdicable.
Woodburn West CPAM- I 2-007 ; AZ- 13 -003
; PP- I 3 -007 PAGE 2I
-
*+ia.
lata at!a traa
l [a r.aa
t
III
rrur
f
J
,\I6D
r
L*
I
re#.
dl
t ffi
Im llrl
EIJ
a YI I l
ll
r=l
ru J
E,.
-FFF
..rmr* tt
J
r il t ry,
dl
o;*
I Jl
\
t !l
da
T---- .. . fi
/
1l
!
IE-
E-
L,
f
I
L I
rc l
nq
EI
r I $
l I
* t
ET I
'wtr rrffi-lrrr
l-
?a
I
I 1
1
F$
sF
I
"q
tt15
.,1..2J ru
-.t
q
t",.
-E
'{
I
*
[d
L/
Fr
st Fr l?
;F
,i
i
llr
r .r
.*
s
a,
I
I
L
i,
-F,.i _
7
rl
J
{
I
I
I
10cl
-roTf
f ro-n.U 61/11-€J'f
R-4
3730
3655
3485
31 95
385 1
3822
3
T
o\
o\
3762
3708
3736
o
\o
€
o\
1 3
361 0 1250
-.q I\
3335
c
,!
E
,o
J
z, E
-NI,i ud 1 160
1450 z
ir i.,
e, $o
31 50
1180
31
123
to
6
tYr
3099 3088
3105
3033 3022
301 1
3000
299s 2982
2977
1515
2953
3 786
3
3668
3650
R-4
2974
795A
2944
3884
:
I
Item #8D, E, F: Woodburn irst Subdivision (CPAM.i2.007; AZ.i3-003; h-r3.007)
Apptication(s): ilok:
Reatl t<c\ - € /(t/.
> >Amendment FZoning Annexation Comprehensive Preliminary & Plat Plan lvlap
*ttil 7r z
ryA;L,f 6
Size of property, existing zoning, and location This site consists of 25.75 acres, is currently zoned RUT
in Ada county, and is
located north of W. Ustick Road, approximately % mile east of N. Linder Road.
Summary of Request: The applicant proposes to amend the FLUIVI contained in the Comp Plan to change the land
use designation
on 6.8+l acres of land from IvlU-C Ma N.C. overlay to MDR. Annexation & zoning of 25.8 acres of land with an R-8 zoning diitrict is
requested consistent with the existing & proposed FLUIVI designation of MDR for
this property. A preliminary plat consisting of 9g new
SFR building lots, 2 lots for the existing homes, & 14 common lots on 25.75 acres is proposed
and is propoled to developin 3 phasei.
A total of 3.91 acres (or 15.2% of the site) is proposed for open space.
Site amenities are proposed as follows: pathways throughout
the site connecting to open space areas, adjacent developments, and through a linear open space along the White Driin at thjwest
boundary of the site; an additional 5% open space above the required amount; a tot lot; picnic
table; a birbeque; bench; a gazebo; and
large common open space areas for sports.
Conceptual building elevations of the future homes in the development were submitted with the application that have since been
revised. The original plans only showed the front elevations & no floor plans were
submitted. Staff was unable to determine the quality
of development (i.e. if there was modulation in wall planes, floor plans
& rooflines; if the quality of design & detail was present
on all
facades; if there was adequate windows on all_elevations to provide articulation & avoid blankwalls; ifihere
was a variety of materials
& color ch anges for variety and interest on all facades, etc.). Because ofthe appearance of alack of quality
in the proposed structures
for the reasons stated, staff recommended in the staff report that the proposed annexatton
& consequenfly t'he CPAM & pp
be denied
as staff did not feel it was in the City's best interests to annex the property
at this time
Slnce the staff report was written, the applicant submitted revised photo elevations, floor plans/footprints
and rear & side elevations that
address staffs concerns and met the approval of the Commission.
Commission Recommendation: Approval
Summary i. ln favor: of Commission Scott Noriyuki Public Hearing:
ii. ln opposition: None
iv.Saleen iir. Written Commenting: testimony: Joe Palomares; Petition signed Alicia by Lease; residents Rick of Wagner Woodburn representing & Sienni Creek Alice Subdivisions; Rick Wagner
representing
Alice
Saleen; Norm Brown; and Scott Noriyuki
Key ii. i. lssue(Quality Recommendation s) of and Discussion design to of by ACHD future Commission:of structures stop signs on for the traffic site. calming in adjacent woodburn subdivrsion;
Key i. Commission At the appllcant's Change(commitment, s) to Staff Recommendation:the Commission recommended masonry accents be applied to 50%
of the available wall length
and at a minimum height of 48 inches on the front facades, excluding the garage
dooiopenings (see DA provision #1.1.h);
"
ii. The and Commission recommended that building lots abuttrng common open space provide
additional articulation, windows,
colors/banding/material changes (i.e. stone or other appropriate material) to
provrde interest on the rear elevations consistent
with the front elevations (see DA provision
#.1.,1.i).
outstanding i The applicant lssue(s) for requests City Council:a waiver to UDC 1 1-3A-3 for tire saleen property (Lot 6, Block 7) to retain access
Item lt4B, C, D: Woodburn lrlust Subdivision (CPAM.12.007; AZ-13.003; Ph3-007)
Application(s):
z iAmendment ;Zoning Annexation Comprehensive Preliminary & Plat Plan Map
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 25.75 acres, is cunently zoned RUT in Ada county, and is
located north of W. Ustick Road, approximately % mile east of N. Linder Road.
Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Medium Density Residential (18.85 acres); Mixed Use - Community w/a Neighborhood
Center overlay (6,8 acres).
Summary of Request: The applicant proposes to amend the FLUM contained in the Comp Plan to change the land use designation
on 6.8+l acres of land from lVlU-C w/a N,C. overlay to MDR. Annexation & zoning of 25.8 acres of land with an R-8 zoning district is
requested consistent with the existing & proposed FLUM designation of MDR for this property. A preliminary plat
consisting of g9
new
SFR building lots, 2 lots for the existing homes, & 14 common lots on 25.75 acres is proposed and is proposed to develop in 3 phases
Conceptual building elevations of the future homes in the development were submitted by the applicant. Because the concept plans
only show the front elevations & no floor plans were submitted, staff was unable to determine the quality of development such as if
modulation exists in wall planes, floor lans & rooflines to articulate bgll{4g mass. & form; if the qu
a resent on
ns to vide articulation & avoid blank wa S; there will
, etc. The elevations epl a mix of materia
be a variety_ of
0 S ( 3 different types
including masonry accents) but appear to have very1 ) modulation
e structurally in footprint and rooflines, some are lacking in
fenestration & have very little color variety. Design review is not typically required for SFR detached homes; however, the City does
encourage single{amily detached developments to incorporate the desrgn guidelines contained in the City's Design Manual.
Because of the appearance of a lack of quality in the proposed shuctures for the reasons
stated, staff recommended in the staff report
that the proposed annexation & consequently the CPAM & PP be denied as staff did not feel it was in the City's best interests to annex
the property at this time with the quality of development proposed.
Since the staff report was written, the applicant submitted revised photo elevations & floor plans/footprints at the last hearing that
demonstrate modulation in the front facades & rooflines, & more windows on the front. There is a mix of materials; however, staff
recommends (& the applicant agrees) if the Commission finds these elevations acceptable that masonry accents should be
provided to 50% of the available wall length at a minimum height of 48" on the front facades (excluding the garage openings).
The new front elevations alleviate much of staffs concerns; however, because the rear of many of the homes will be highly visible from
the common open spaces and pathways, staff still would like to see the rear
(& side) elevations before being in full support of the
revised elevations$here appropriate, windows should be placed on all elevations and detailed to provide
articulation & avoid
blank walls. The placement, size & proportions and details of windows should contribute
to the architectural charac{er of the
buildino. \
Since the last Commission hearing, the applicant has submitted rear & side building elevations for consideration by the Commission.
Written Testimony: Petition from residents of Woodburn & Sienna Creek subdivisions; Rick Wagner (representing Alice Saleen);
Norm Brown; and Scott Noriyuki (response in agreement w/the comments in the staff report
- would like the Commission to consider a
favorable recommendation based on the upgraded elevatrons provided)
rt(. o/
t J@o J +\ Aotb
o.r+ta lL+,Yn, t,t,\ /eut Cc /or d,h €-tc. d-n .rtaQ z/tt'-
Notes:
Changes to Agenda: None JA//+ t,/an'q*/l
-ryhiffiG;'*ffi
* R.rcr d%*,
7
Item #4A, B, C: Woodburn West Subdivision (CPAM-12.007; A2.13-003; PP-13-007)
Application(s):
) iAmendment )Zoning Annexation Comprehensive Preliminary & Plat Plan Map
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 25.75 acres, is cunently zoned RUTinAda
county, and is located north of W. Ustick Road, approximately % mile east of N. Linder Road.
Adlacent Land Use q Zoning:
,'rutl*lfr
North: School. zoned R-4: SFR (Sienna Creek Sub.). zoned R-8
South: Rural residential property, zoned RUT in Ada County; Ustick Road
East: SFR (Woodbum Sub.); vacant commercial property, zoned C-C
West: Rural residential/agncultural property, zoned RUT in Ada County
Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: lVedium Density Residential (18.85 acres); l\4ixed Use - Community w/a
Neighborhood Center overlay (6.8 acres).
Summary of Request: The applicant proposes to amend the FLUM contained in the Comp Plan to change the land
use designation on 6.8+l acres of land from MU-C a N.C. overlay to MDR. Annexation & zoning of 25.8 acres of
land with an R-8 zoning district is requested consistent with the existing & proposed FLUM designation of [/DR for
this property. A preliminary plat consisting of 99 new SFR building lots, 2 lots for the existing homes, &
14 common
lots on 25.75 acres is proposed and is proposed to develop in 3 phases.
Access is depicted on the plat at the north & east boundanes via N. Anfield Avenue, W. Apple Pine Street, and W,
Woodpine Skeet, existing intemal stub streets to the site. A stub street is depicted at the west boundary of the site
and to the south to the Salenn & Richard properties for future extension. No public street access is proposed
or
approved via W. Ustick Road. The 2 existing homes cunently take access via Ustick Road. The Saleen property has
frontage on Ustick & the cell tower that exists on the north end of their property has an easement to access their
facility via Ustick. The applicant requests a waiver from Council to UDC 1 1-3A-3 for the Saleen property to be
allowed to retain access to Ustick until such time as the property redevelops in the future; at such time, access via
Ustick would be re-evaluated. The Richard property has an easement over the Cooper property
to the south for
access to Ustick via N. Cooper Lane. Staff does not object to them continuing to use this access, however upon
redevelopment of the property, access should be taken intemally & the Ustick access discontinued.
At staffs request, the applicant has submitted a conceptual street layout plan for adjacent properties that
depicts
connections to stub streets proposed in the subject plat, intemal circulation, and access
points via Ustick & Linder
Roads in alignment with existtng & future accesses across Ustick & Ljnder. This netwo* is only a concept & may
change but the goal was to illustrate access points
& sewer connection to Ustick Road.
A landscape plan is proposed that depicts 15.270 (or 3.91
acres) open space and site amenities as follows: pathways
throughout the site connecttng to open space areas, adlacent developments, and through a linear open space along
the White Drain at the west & southwest boundanes of the site; an additional 5% open space; a tot lot; picnic table,;
BBQ; bench; a gazebo; and large common open space areas for sports.
There is existing 6joot tall fencing along the northern boundary of the site & along the portion of the
east boundary
that abuts Woodbum subdivision; a 4Joot tall open cedar fence is proposed along the rear lot lines
of the remainder
of the site, excluding the outer perimeter boundary of the Richard & Saleen properties.
The White Drain is required to
be fenced in accord with UDC standards to deter access to the ditch,
a[+pen diteheq-+aMc-orcanals o nlhe site exchding-thefffrte'Dram-aEEquredlo+€frp.d-
Conceptual building elevations of the future homes in the development were submitted by the applicant. Because the
concept plans only show the front elevations & no floor plans were submitted, staff was unable to determine the
quality of development such as if modulation exists in wall planes, floor plans & rooflines to articulate building mass
&
form; if the quality of design & detail is present on all facades;
if there are adequate windows on all elevations to
provide articulation & avoid blank walls; if there will be a vanety of materials & color changes for variety and interest
on all facades, etc. The elevations do depict a mix of matenals (3 different types including masonry accents) but
appear to have very little (if any) modulation structurally in footprint and rooflines, some are lacking in fenestration &
have very little color vanety. Design review is not typically required for SFR detached homes; however, the City does
encourage singlejamily detached developments to incorporate the design guidelines contained in the City's Design
lvlanual.
Because of the app earance of alack oI quality in the proposed structures for the
reasons stated, staff recommended
in the staff report that the proposed annexation & consequently the CPANiI & PP be denred as staff did not feel it was
in the City's best interests to annex the property at this time with the quality
of development proposed.
Since the staff report was written, the applicant has submitted revised photo elevations & floor plans/footprints that
demonstrate modulation in the fronl facades & rooflines, & more windowS on the front. There is a mix of materials;
however, staff recommends (& the applicant agrees) if the Commission finds these elevations acceptable
that masonry accents should be provided to 50% of the available wall length at a minimum height of 48" on
the front facades (excluding the garage openings).
The new front elevations alleviate much of staffs concerns: however, because the rear of many of the homes will be
highly visible from the common open spaces and pathways, staff still would ke to see the rear (& side) elevattons
before being in full support of the revised elevations. Where appropriate, windows should be placed on all
elevations and detailed to provide articulation & avoid blank walls. The placement, size & proportions
and
details of windows should contribute to the architectural character of the building.
Staff & the applicant are working together on this matter & I'm confident that we'll reach a product that is consistent
with the intent of the design guidelines. Staff is supportive of the CPAM & PP and also the AZ fthe issues noted
with the elevations can be worked out.
Written Testimony: Petition from residents of Woodburn & Sienna Creek subdivisions; Rick Wagner (representing
Alice Saleen); Norm Brown; and Scott Noriyuki (response in agreement W/the comments in the staff report
- would
like the Commtssion to consider a favorable recommendation based on the upgraded elevations provided)
Notes:
\./ V \JV
Bruce Freckleton
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mack Myers <mack@settlersirrigation.org>
Tuesday, April 30, 2013 11:28 AM
clerk; Bruce Freckleton
RE: city of Meridian Dev App - woodburn west subdivision cpAM AZpp
Settlers lrrigation District operates multiple facilities within, and close proximity to the project
site and requires all
construction plan be reviewed by the District prior to any development to ensure all irrigation facilities remain
protected.
Please contact,
Mack Myers
District Manager
Settlers lrrigation District
P.O. Box 7571
Boise, lD 83707
Cell 208-871-4468 Office 208-343 5271, Fax 208 343-1.642
From: Machelle Hill [mailto:mhill@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Monday, April 29,Z0l3 3:11 pM
subject: city of Meridian Dev App - woodburn west subdivision cpAM
AZ pp
II}AHO
City of Meridian
City Clerk's Office
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian,ID 83642
Planning and Zoning Conmtissiott
Development Applicotion Transmittul
To: Outer Comments due Mr 2013
Transmittal Date: 2013 File No.: AZI
PP
H Date: I 2013 N
Request: Public Hearing Amend the Future
Land U se Map contained tn the Comprehensive
Plan to ch ange the land use
designation on 6.8 + acres of land from Mixed
U se-
Community (MU-c) with a N orhood
eighb Center (N .c. to
) overlayMDR (Medium
Density Residential) Annexation and
Zoning of ) 5.8 acres of
land with an R-8 zoning
district AND Plat aI
Preliminary approv consisting of 99
single-family residential
buildingI6 Iots and common/ other
Iots on 25 75 acres of land tn
L proposed R-8
district for woodburn W, est Subdivision
Northside
Location of Property or Project:
North of W. Ustick
Linder Road
Road, approximately Ye mile east of N.
1
' \-. \__/ J
v
The City of Meridian is requesting comments and recommendations on the application referenced above. To review
detailed lnformation about the request, please click on the file number above to take you direcfly io the application.
We request that you submit your comments or recommendations by date specified above. When
responding, please
reference the file number of the project. rf responding by emair, prelse send comments
to creik@meridiancitv.oro.
For additional information associated with this application please contacl City Clerk's Office at number below.
Thank you,
Machelle Hill
Meridian City Clerk's Office
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, lD 83642
(208) 888-4433
m hill@meridiancitv.orq
2
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Attachments:
Subject:
Scott Noriyuki <scott@northsidemgt.com>
Wednesday, May 22,2013 10:04 AM
'Mindy Wallace'
Caleb Hood; Sonya Watters
RE:Woodburn West
Woodburn Neighbor Requested Stop Signs.pdf
Good morning Mindy -
Please find the attached Woodburn West exhibit that depicts the Neighbors requested locations for stop sign
installation.
I have overlaid this with the conceptual roadway masterplan I put together in hopes we can all see impacts as well
future
access/roadway opportunities.
That said, the Neighbor's goals are to mitigate high speed traffic through their portions of the overallarea -
until such
time
the Southern propertiesdevelop and provide relief via Ustickand Linderconnections. lam supportive and willingto pay
for
the stop signs as well as their installation.
Thanks and please feel free to call or email anytime with questions.
Scott Noriyuki
(2O8) 23O-t2O2
scott@ n orthsidemqt. com
r*.ISF?THS'DE
rf{,qhNAGEIVIHhIT
From : Mindy Wallace Imailto: Mwallace@achdida
ho.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22,2013 9:23 AM
To: Scott Noriyuki
Subject: Woodburn West
Scott,
It sounds like you proposed some stop sign locations as part of
your hearing at the city of Meridian last night. could you
please provide me an exhibit identifying those locations so I can include that information
in the ACHD staff report.
1
\,
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Subiect:
Scott Noriyuki <scott@northsidemgt.com>
Thursday, May 16, 2073 4:04 PM
Sonya Watters
Response to Woodburn West Staff Report
Sonya -
Please consider this email as formal response to the Woodburn West Staff Report.
We are in agreement with the conditions as identified within the Staff Report. Further, we have provided several
upgraded
elevations, footprints and angled photography of the proposed housing product for the development following receipt
of the Staff Report. I anticipate that Staff, the P&Z Commission and Council would agree that the proposed product is of
high
quality and deserves recommendation for approval.
Thank you and please feel free to call or email anytime with questions.
Scott Noriyuki
(2O8) 23O-12O2
scott@northsidemqt.com
h,I(}FETHS*r}T
l\ctANP-#ffiMMhIT
1
Y
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
FYI
Bill Parsons, AICP
Associate City Planner
Com munity Development Department
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, ldaho 83642
PHONE: (208)884-5533
FAX: (208) 888-68s4
bparsons@meridiancity . org
Bill Parsons
Monday, April 29, 2013 4:09 PM
Sonya Watters
FW:Comments
From: Perry Palmer
Sent: Monday, April 29,2073 3:41 PM
To: Bill Parsons
Subject: Comments
Hi Bill,
Sorry again for missing the pre-app this morning on Hacienda. Let me know if I need to answer any questions?
As for the comments meeting for Thursday. I have a conflict with the time. lf it is only Woodburn West that will be
discussed, knowing the plan from Accela, here are my numbers:
#tt, L3,18, 19, 20,23,25,
I believe this is all single family. lf there is any multi-family planned, please let me know so I can make some additional
comments. Any questions at all, please let me know.
Thanks,
Perry
Perry Polmer, Deputy Chief of Fire Prevention
Meridlon Fire Deportmenl
208-888-r234
1
Dedic otio n, Loy olty, Tr odilio n
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Rick Wagner < rick2@cableone.net>
Friday, February 22,201,3 9.48 AM
Sonya Watters
Norman Brown; Latrice Saleen
Woodburn West Subdivision/application CPAM L2-007 PP-13-004
Sewer Liner agreement 02 03 2013001jp9
Dear Sonya:
I am Rick Wagner and am representing Mrs. Alice (Latrice) Saleen. Along with her daughter Sheila Wagner we are her
care givers with Power of Attorney, and also reside with her at 1250 W. Ustick Rd. Meridian. I am writing this letter in
response to the proposed sewer line stub out/depth placement for the Woodburn Subdivision. Any future development
oftheSaleenpropertyisdependentuponthedepthofthesewerstuboutthatwill borderthe property. Ane-mail
daled O|/3O/2O73 from Scott Noriyuki at scott@ northsidemgt.com to yourself and Norm Brown , Alice's
Rea ltor a nd
representative in the proposed development of Wood burn West Subdivision outlining a n agreement in lhat "we will
instdll sewer through Woodburn #2 os deep ds possible with considerotion to Meridion Public Works stondords, existing
connection points .... As designed on the preliminory plot." "it is understood thot we ore moking these accommodotions
ot your explicit request..." Alice, upon advice of her lawyer the following language was added to the document: "...ond
to ensure, if it is possible to do so without unredsonoble burdens upon the developer, thot the sewer line where it meets
with the Alice Sdleen property will be ploced sufficiently deep to allow sewer connections thereto
from the Alice Soleen
property in the future to
flow properly when connected." With these explicit accommodations Alice was in support of
the project and would not protest.
I have attached a copy of the signed agreement for your reference. However Mr. Noriyuki, after considerable delay
blacked out that portion ofthe document and forwarded it to you. Alice does not agree with the document as changed
by Mr. Noriyuki. ln blacking out that portion of the document Mr. Noriyuki cited City of Meridian and Unified
Development Code. I can only find reference to Sewer in minimum fall required to pipe size that would, in my layman's
opinion, affect the sewer stub out depth at the proposed location.
We do not wish to place undue burden upon yourself, the city of Meridian nor upon the buyer, however we do not
want any undue problems or burdens placed upon Alice in the future development of her property.
lf the Sewer stub
out is not placed as deep as possible and the road stub out is not placed at the revised location
as agreed upon by
Northside Management the future development of Alice's property will be adversely effected as well as the City of
Meridians future development in this area. Without adequate sewer, water and road stub outs to the rear (North 7
%
acres) of the property, development will be virtually impossible for the foreseeable future. Development and sale of this
property can only be advantageous to the City of Meridian with annexation into the city and that is only possible with
proper sewer, water and road placement by Woodburn West Subdivision developers.
Additionally, Sonya, is there any other people that I should copy this e-mail to?
I realize that you are busy as I am sure all city employees are however I would respectfully request a reply to this letter
with your opinion and recommendations if any.
Thank you for your time,
Rick Wagner
1250 W. Ustick Rd.
Meridian lD, 83646
208-315-2296
1
Alice Saleen
1250 W. Ustick
Meridiarr Idaho 83642
In summary it is underslood that;
You are in-fact a representative of the property owner (Alice Saleen) and
rcpresent interests on behalfofher. Further, you have agreed to provide
documentation of this.
The developer agrees to install the sewer through Woodbum #2 as deep as
possibie with consideration to Meridian Public Works standards, existing
connection points, existing sewer invert elevations, site topography and
locations to be within Woodbum #2 Public Rights of Way (roads) as
designed on the preliminary plat and to ensure, if it is possible to do so
without unreasonable burdens upon the developer, that the sewer line
where it meets with the Alice Saleen property will be placed sufficiently
deep to allow sewer connections thereto from the Alice Saleen property in
the future to flow properly when connected.
You have requested that we move the singular (and only required) stub
street South to be inline with W. Sandelwood Dr. as indicated on the
preliminary plat. I am prepared to make this accommodation with the
understanding that sewer will be located within this stub in addition to
water. These are your requests.
It is understood that we are making these accommodations at your explicit
request and upon doing so you and your Client make assertions that you
are satisfied and in suppo( of our project moving forward.
It is understood that this email is a historical basis for what we have
agreed to. This will serve as a memorandum of rmderstanding and will be
signed by you and your Client.
It is understood that time is of the essence with regard to signing and
returning this understanding.
a
o
a
Please see tlre attached Woodburn #2 preliminary plat exhibit which depicts the
relocation of the stub street and sewer line.
Norm Brown
Realtor, Mark Bottles Real Estate Services
Date
Alice Saleen
Owner, 1250 W. Ustick RD Meridian, ID
Parcel
#s0436336230 Aa), i 44' Date_f!-1,t
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Subiect:
Attachments:
Norm Brown < nbrown@ markbottles.com >
Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:15 PM
Sonya Watters
1250 W. Ustick & Woodburn Subdivision
Norm Brown (nbrown@markbottles.com).vcf; Alice Saleen Developer Sewer Agreement
signed by Agent and Alice.pdf; Alice Saleen Understanding Signed and Blacked out.jpeg
Dear Sonya:
I am sending you this letter to make sure that there are no m isund ersta nd ings on Alice L. Saleen's Property
located at L250 W. Ustick. We don't want the City of Meridian to have any undue problems with the sewer
nor do we want John Laude to have any problems, and we don't want the sewer stub to create a problem for
Mr. Sa leen's property.
As you know from previous email's we have been concerned that the sewer be buried to a maximum depth
where it stubs into Mrs. Saleens Property.
Scott Noriyuki sent us a letter from the buyer John Laude that stated we agreed to the following changes:
1. The road stub would be relocated to the center area of the development.
2. The sewer depth would be placed at the maximum depth.
After q,e received this letter, Mrs. Saleen signed a revised Letter that her attorney
advised her on. So did I as
her Agent. This letter was signed on the date of 2/a/B.lt was emailed back to Scott Noriyuki. Today we
received a letter with a blacked out area that Mrs. Saleen's Attorney had written his recommendation in. That
area was initialed by Scott Noriyuki. Our initials on that sheet do not constitute agreement with the Blacked
out area as this document was signed by us prior to the area being blacked out. I am enclosing both
documents for your records.
We don't in any way want to create an adversarial relationship we just want to be sure that Mrs. Saleen's best
interests are not overlooked and the city sewer from her property does not become a problem.
Thank you.
Norm Brown
Mark Bottles Real Estate Services
208-866-2450 CeLl
208-377 -5700 Offrce
208-489-9074 Fax
839 S. Bridgeway Place
Eagle, ID 83616
1
www.markbottles.eom
Alice Saleen
1250 W. {Jstick
Meridiar,Idaho 83642
ln summary it is understood that;
I You are ia-fact arepresentative ofthe property o\ryner (Alice Salcen) and
replesenl interests on behalfofher. Further, you have agreed to provide
r documEntation The developr agrees of this.to install the sewer tbrough Woodbum #2 as deep as
possible withconsideration to Meridian Public Works standards, existing
connection points, existing sewer invert elevafions, site topography and
losations to be within'Woodbum #2 Public Riehrs of Way (roads) as
designed on the preliminary plat *nd [o ensure, if it is possible to do so
r*i&out unreasonable burdens upon the developer, that the xwer linc
where it meets with the Alice Saleen property will be pl*ced sufficiently
de*p to allow sewer eafl$ectioss thereto from the Alice Saleen prcperty in
I the You fi.have rture to requested flow properly that we when move connected- thr singuiar (and only required) stub
street South to be in-line with \fI. Sardelwood Dr. as indicated oa the
preliminary plat. I am prepared to make this accommodation with the
understanding that sewer will b€ located within this stub in addition to
r w&It is ter. rurderstood ?hesr arc that your we requests.are making these ascommodations at your explicit
request aod upon doing so you ard your Client make assertions that you
r are It is satisfied understood and tLat in support thix email of our is a project historical moving basis forward. for what we have
agreed to. This will serve asi a memor:mdum of understarrding and will be
r It signed is understood by you and that your time Client.is of &e essence with regard to signing and
returning this understaading.
Please see the attached Woodburn #2 prelirninary plar exhibit which depicts the
relscation of the stilb sheet and sewer line.
Norm Bmwn
Realtor, Mark Real Estare Seryices
Date X,-V-r g
Alice Saleen
Owner, 1250 W. Ustick RD Meridiaa IO
Pareel
#50436336230 4/,, I
rd,-o ,*e,l:ft=yr
V
Alice Saleen
I250 W. Ustick
Meridiaa tdalo 83642
In sumrnary it is r&dersood thaq
a
You are in-fact a rcprerntativc of the property owrrcr (Alicc salcen) and
rcprgsant interests on behalfofher. Furttrer, you have agreed to provide
documcnation of this.
The developer sgr€es to install the sewer through woodburn #2 as deep as
posible wi& cousideration to Meridian Public works srandards, edsting
connection points, existirg scwcr inrnrt clevations, site topography and
locations to be within Woodbum
ou havc rqucstcd wB movc thc singular (and only rcquired) stub
a
a
street South to be in-line with W. Sandelwood Dr. as indicatod on the
pretiminary plat. I am prcpared to make this accommodation with thc
undcrstanding tlrat scwer will bc located wilhin this stub in addition to
o water. It is understood Thcse are that your we requests.are making these accommodations at your explicit
request a1d upon doing so you and your Client make assertions that you
o arc It is satisfied understood and that in supp,this ort email of ow is a project historical moving basis forward. for what we have
agrccd to. This will scrve as a memorandum of understanding and will be
r It signed is understood by you and that yow timc Client.is of the eEscnce with regard to signing and
rcturning thi s understanding.
Please scc thc attachcd woodbum #2 pruliminary plat exhibit which depicts the
rclocation of thc stub street and sewer tine.
Norm Brown
Realtor, Mark Real Estare Services i-t-r;
Alice Saleen
Owner, 1250 W. Ustick RD Meridian,ID
Parpsl
#s0436336230
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Subiect:
Sonya Watters
Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:49 PM
Scott Noriyuki (scott@northsidemgt.com)
RE:Woodburn Sub
Subject: RE: Woodburn Sub /
One more thing...l need a letter frM
Ok, you're in trouble....the more I look at your application, the more I see missing...You are officially on application
submittal probation - if it's not complete, we're not taking it in.
O
You also need to submit . t#er from ACHD (Mindy Wallace) confirming that a TIS is not required and/or has been
submitted for review to ACHD.
From: Sonya Watters
Sent: Thursday, January 3t,2013 4:41 PM
To: Scott Noriyuki (scott@northsidemgt.com )"d N
pt\
the Ada County Surveyor's office approving the subdivision name. The email you
submitted is a letter to him, not from him approving the name. Additionally, I don't know if the Ada County Surveyor's
office will allow it but they City will not allow a preliminary plat name with a #2 in it...it's too confusing when final plats
come through, so please change the name (i.e. Woodburn West Sub, or ?). Thx
From: Sonya Watters
Sent: Thursday, January 37, 2073 4:32 PM
To: Scott Noriyuki (scott@nofthsidemgt.com)
Subject: Woodburn Sub
Scott,
I still need the following:
. -ihe first page of the application form needs to be revised to reflect the current owners (Sagewood
Development
Corp. & Dick & Glenda Richards)
. --De-e4j{ Sagewood Development Corp.'s name
.Drawings . JLegal '-OLsJ< w/description, conceptual exhibit engineering map, & plans closure in a sheet format for that lhe entire complies annexation with the area Specifications as
a whole for Project
. JLegal description & closure sheet for the area included in the plat as a whole
o .--Electronic copy of the landscape plan (email is fine)
lf you have questions, let me know.
Thanks,
<to*{to.- Wafto:tt
Associate City Planner, Planning Division
City of Meridian - Community Development Department
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102
Meridian, lD 83642
1
V
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Norm Brown < nbrown@markbottles.com >
Wednesday, January 30, 2013 8:06 AM
Sonya Watters
Woodburn Subdivision
Norm Brown (nbrown@markbottles.com).vcf
Sonya,
Thanks for speaking with me in December about the Woodburn Subdivision on Ustick and N. Venable Ave East of Linder
and North of Ustick. I have done the following things you suggested. Enclosed is a map to help with the visual on this.
1. Contact John La ude before they ask for a prelim inary plat. I have called John multiple times. lknow he is doing a lot
of projects. However, he has not returned my calls. I heard he was sick with the flu for some time.
2. I Contacted Scott Noriyuki who drew up the preliminary plat. I spoke with him about the only road access was in the
NE corner next to the school on the North side. Scott told me that I needed to get John's ok to change where the road
goes in. We will likely need two access points maybe one would work. lf we do use one access point it will need to be in
the middle of the land not on the end.
3. I met with Gary Inselman at ACHD on this and he looked this over and agreed with the assessment that we need the
road moved to the middle of the land or stub in two streets. Ustick is not a likely option based on where NW 12th Drive
accesses Ustick.
On a Separate issue: Sewer to 1250 W. Ustick
Thanks for your time on these important issues as you can see we are trying to address them before this goes up for
approva l.
Sincerely,
Norm
NormBrown
Mark Bottles Real Estate Services
208-866-2450 Cell
2Q8-377-5700 Ofrce
208-489-907 4 Fax
839 S. Bridgeway Place
Eagle, ID 83616
1
www.markbottles.com
Sawtooth School is on the North Side of this Property. lnordertogetsewertodrainthesewermustbeputinatits
maximum depth in the Woodburn Subdivision. I met with Denny Cline and he said we have enough fall, we measured
out the distance. There is enough fall to run sewer through the stubs that Woodburn will provide. ljust want to make
sure we keep the Woodburn Subdivision buried as deep as possible.
Barbara Shiffer
From:
Sent:
Subject:
Machelle Hill
Monday, February 11,2013 9.59 AM
FW: City of Meridian Dev App - Woodburn West Sub CPAM AZPP
from: Machelle Hill
Sent: Monday, February 11,2013 9:58 AM
Subject: City of Meridian Dev App - Woodburn West Sub CPAM AZ PP
InIAl\tr
IDAHO
City of Meridian
City Clerk's Office
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, ID 83642
Planning and Zonbtg Commission
D evelop me n t Ap p lic atio n T ra ns mittal
To: Citv Departrnents Comments due by: February 28,2013
Transmittal Date: February 11,2013 File No.: CPAM 12-007. AZ 13-003 & PP 13-004
Hearing Date: March 7,2013
Request: Public Hearing: Amend the Future Land Use Map contained in the Comprehensive
PIan to change the land use designation on 16.18 acres of land from MU-C (Mixed
Use Community) to MDR (Medium Density Residential); Annexation and Zoning of
16.18 acres of land with an R-8 zoning district AND Preliminary Plat approval
consisting of 64 single-family residential building lots & 7 common/other lots on 16.18
acres of land in a proposed R-8 district for Woodburn West Subdivision
By Northsi{e Management, LLC
Location of Property or Project: North of W. Ustick Road, approximately % mile east of N.
Linder Road
The City of Meridian is requesting comments and recommendations on the application referenced above. To review
detailed information about the request, please click on the file number above to take you directly to the application.
We request that you submit your comments or recommendations by date specified above. When responding, please
reference the file number of the project. lf responding by email, please send comments to clerk@meridiancitv.orq.
For additional information associated with this application please contact City Clerk's Office at number below.
Thank you,
Machelle Hill
Meridian City Clerk's Office
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, lD 83642
(208) BBB-4433
mhill@meridiancitv.oro
1
to Ustick Road until
such time as the property redevelops (if Councit
approves a waiver, coiditions #1.1f should'be stricken).
written Testimony since commission Hearing: scott Noriyuki, Applicant (in
agreement w/staff report)
Notes
4
'\,)
l
:
1680
C.C
2997
tO
lrl
F-
o\
r-ry
3878
3860
3844
3868
3846
874
C.C
I
i
I
I
I
:
fl 1009
980
BDI\I}SICIN NO.
lt
SU ,t
S[WTR
WOODtsU
ixlli'*iT ts
SitEI NO.
1
LccATm N rnr iiw r./+ 0r sEcl|(x J6. T.4!., R.rw., B,rr.
ADA ai,l,MTY tfit&1
:Tr
i
!
I
I
-*
WfST
) Residential subdivision trees
) Acreage dedicated for common open space
) Number of trees provided on common lot(s)
F Mitigation for removal of existing trees
K Reduction of the landscape plan (8 Vz" x ll") t/
Site report of the highest seasonal groundwater elevation prepared by a registered soils
scientist t/
a
a
a
t/
t/
a
&/4
Description
t/
) Acreage dedicated for common open space
) Number of trees provided on common lot(s)
r/ Reduction D of Mitigation the landscape for removal plan (8 Yz" of existing x ll") trees
Site report of the highest seasonal groundwater elevation prepared by a registered soils
scientist
a
a
a
o Date- scale-
hiph sronndwater areas, and rock outcroppings.
a
,