HomeMy WebLinkAboutAZ-14-001 Application Checklist,Sa,/
OW, Planning Department
IDAHO ANNEXATION/REZONE r Application Checklist
Application is required to contain one copy of the following:
Note: Only one copy of the above items need be submitted when submitting multiple applications
Additional Requirements for Annexation/Rezone Applications:
33 E. Broadway Avenue o Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile: (20s) 888-6854 r website: www.meridiancity.org
(Rev. 02/08/l 3)
name: Ten Mile Center Annexation
Treasure V LLC I LLP
Completed & signed Commission & Council Review Application
Narrative fully describing the proposed project
Legal description ofthe properry to be annexed and/or rezoned
o Include a metes & bounds description to tho section line of all adjacent roadways, stamped & signed by a
registered professional land surveyor, with a calculated closure sheet.
o Scaled exhibit map showing the boundaries of the legal description in compliance il the requirements of the
Idaho State Tax Commission Property Tax Administrative Rules IDAPA 35.01.03.225.01.h.
o If requesting more than one zoning designation, include a legal description for each zone along with an overall
annexation/rezone boundary description. Also include the boundaries ofeach different zone on the map.
*Note: lllhen also submitting a Preliminary Plat application, a separate legal description is
requiredfor the
boundaries of the plat, excluding property to the section line as
required.for annexations/rezones.
./ Recorded warranty deed for the sublect property
.v Affidavit of Legal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner
(lf owner is a corporation,
submit a copy ofthe Articles of Incorporation or other evidence to show ttrat the person sigring is an authorized agent.)
Scaled vicinity map showing the location of the subject properfy
Provide concept plan (Roads, access points, parking, general Iayout ofbuildings and building elevations.)
{ Pre-application meeting notes (All applications that require a public hearing are required to conduct a
pre-
application meetins with the Plannine DeDartment.)
Neighborhood meeting sign-in sheet (Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting to provide
an opportunity for public review ofthe proposed proiect prior to the submittal ofan application.)
Commitment of Property Posting form signed by the applicant/agent
Parcel verification leffer from Development Services (887-221l)
Fee (Please call Planning Department to calculate correct fee. Applications with
incorrect fees will not be accepted.)
./ If this application is not accompanied by a plat, conditional use permit, or
development application, submit a conceptual development plan and elevations for the
property (also submit an electronic version of the plan(s) in pdf format on a disk with the file named
with project name & plan type [i.e.
conceptual development plan, elevations]).
planned unit
File #: A'7 .- // -f.o /
,,^{sJ
Description
Staff
({)
Applicant
({)
U
Applicant ({ Description Staff
(./)
c0 MPASS
February 2L,2014
Sonya Watters
City of Meridian
33 E Broadway Ave. Suite 102
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Re: Ten Mile Center Annexation and Rezone
Dear Ms. Watters:
The Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS)
received the transmittal of the annexation and zoning of approximately
201 acres, Ten Mile Center (AZ 14-001). Proposed zoning includes
Medium Density Residential (13.2 acres), Traditional Neighborhood -
Center) (26.L acres) and General Retail and Service Commercial (81.4
acres). The project is located near the southeast corner of West
Franklin Road and South Ten Mile Road.
Site Conditions and Forecasts
The Communities in Motion 2040 Vision identifies this location as a
mixed use area. Mixed use areas include a horizontal mix of land uses,
including housing and employment, spread out in relatively low
density. Complete streets for all users would be a priority.
The 2035 Planning Functional Classification Map indicates Franklin
Road and Ten Mile Road as principal arterials. Figure 1 shows the 2035
planning functional classification of existing and proposed roadways in
the vicinity of the site and an explanation is available on the COMPASS
website at http : //www. com passida ho. orglprodserv/fu nc- maps. htm .
ure 1
COMMUI{ITY PI.AilNING ASSOCIATION
of Southwest ldaho
I
I
,t
I brhCibtbn.bnndbq,.
l.,' ,
-
lnteEtate
- - - - Proposed lnterstate
Expressway
Proposed Expressway
-
Principal Arterial
-'- - Proposed PrincipalArterial
-
MinorArterial
- - - ProposedMinorArterial
-
Collector
- - - ProposedCollector
i J_ _ _ r
s: a
€ir
;I
o8
5
700 NE 2nd Street, Suite 200
Mericlian, lD 83642
P.208.85s.2558
F.208.855.2559
wlvw.compassidaho.org
t
t
The site completely comprises traffic analysis zone (TAZ) 1016 and a portion of TAZ
1018 (Table 1).
Table 1
TAZ 2070 Census 2O4O Forecast
Households Jobs Households Jobs
1016 12 0 947 213
1018 12 0 775 730
Other recent develo ment ls in the area include:
.assuming 4-8 households per
acre
#assuming 10-15 jobs per
acre for commercial land
Please see Figure 2 for the TAZs adjacent to the project and Table 2 for the current
and forecasted demographics in those TAZs.
ure 2
-
lnterstiate
- - - - Proposed lnterstate
Expressway
Proposed Expressway
-
PrincipalArterial
- - - - Proposed PrincipalArterial
-
MinorArterial
-
Collector
- - - ProposedMinorArterial
f!Traric Anatysis Zone (TAZ)
AdaActivePrelimsComplete
Development Proposal Proposed
(Preliminary Plats)
TAZ
Households. Jobs#
Ten Mile Center (AZ 14-001) 10 16 53- 106 1,o75-1,670
Avendale (PP-11-001) 1003 369 0
Barraya (PP-06-062 101 1 336 0
Ten Mile Crossing (PP-11-010) 1007 and 1010 1,O34 985-1,475
TM Crossing (PP-12-003) 1019 0 755-1,130
TM Creek (PP-13-030) -
pending
1018 0 415-730
Totals 2,550-2,603 3,230-4,945
1001
rE
#,i I
tN3
tuwit
10o6 tutS
1011
Ba.qa
1012 ,Ut IMC@k
100t
len Mile C&btAhMaton fid 2qtog
1016
Io ,ft Caosng
1010
,Olt fuc@sg.rg - td
!
t
Table 2
2070 Census 2O4O Forecast
TAZ Households Jobs Households Jobs
1003 4 0 369 L20
1005 2 375 2 7375
1006 4 11 255 51
1007 1 0 155 300
1010 1 0 285 500
7012 0 0 645 15
1016 t2 0 947 213
toLT 154 t4t 323 208
1018 72 0 775 730
1019 9 0 0 841
Total 799 527 3r756 41453
The approved preliminary plats in the area will consumeT3-75o/o of the forecasted
housing. The entitled developments, including the proposed annexation, may exceed
the 2040 employment forecast by up to 23o/o or 1,019 jobs.
Regional Transportation Improvement Program
In the FY2OL4-2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Franklin
Road is programmed to be widened from two lanes to five lanes from Black Cat Road
to Ten Mile Road (TIP Key #t2368). Construction is scheduled for FY2016.
Additional information about the TIP can be found at:
http://www. com passida ho. org/prodserv/tra nsim
provement. htm
Access Management
As a principal arterial, Ten Mile Road needs to accommodate traffic as efficiently as
possible, and there are existing access points to serve the properties. No additional
access is anticipated from Ten Mile Road, and internal circulation/off-street
connections with neighboring parcels is provided.
Mobility Management
The proposed annexation and zoning calls for mixed-use development, which can
potentially reduce the need for automobile travel by concentrating essential services
near residential areas. The location is not within a quarter mile oiexisting transit
stops or transit routes. The closest bus stop is approximately 3 miles east at
progress
Avenue and Corporate Drive, which is an intercity stop for Route 42. The closesf
existing park and ride facility is located at the Axiom Gym approximately 3 miles east
of the development, and is an intercity stop that services Route 40. The Axiom park
and ride is utilized by carpoolers, and serves several Commuteride vanpools as well.
Valley Regional Tran_sit has developed a transit plan titled valleyconnect,
which
establishes a vision for future transit system needs based on short-term growth
projections, regional and local land uses, and roadway plans. This plan
guidenetp wilt
future transit investments, The proposed development is in pioximity
planneda primary to
service route along Franklin Road. This route would serve up to
minute frequencies 15
and provides service connections from ilre coirege of western
Idaho Transfer Center to the Boise Towne Square Mall Transfer Center. This proposed
development is also in proximity to the Union Pacific Railroad corridor, which is a
future consideration for high capacity transit services across the reglon. Additionally,
a new park and ride facility is in the design phase, and is planned for the southwest
corner of the intersection of Ten Mile Road and Overland Road. This future facility will
be built to accommodate carpool, vanpool and transit activities.
The proposed development is in the Meridian School District boundary, and is within
the Peregrine Elementary enrollment area. The proposed development is adjacent to
Peregrine Elementary school. Pedestrian access to Peregrine Elementary school
should be included in the development of the property. The proposed development is
approximately 1-mile from Fuller Park.
If you have any questlons, please contact Carl Miller at COMPASS, 2O8-475-2239 or
cmiller@comoassidaho.oro.
Sincerely,
Matthew J. Sto ll
Executive Director
pc: Justin Lucas, City of Meridian
Mindy Wallace, Ada County Highway District
File 701
CM:nb T:\FY14\700 Services\701 General Membership Services\Development Review\Merid ian\Ten Mile
center.docx
ru
t-
gr
H
J-)
t{
l-)
lJ.
l{
j-)
oq
w
N
olr{
y)
ldo t{
gn Soq L)
Y oiJ no Htd iJ tu5 ,i--{ ,
/ts|l f] a' -)d.
\JA
+H\J 5
II
Locer IttbrclntW tccecof u$0000rtdra.
,'id"t tb ioD.ct o(u iucr-
clqreTatda
licril5trft qc*ioahtbc
.01 II'
r&ol
,Ade*aEe@
Tho ldaho Stat€5ttBn . llo.td.y, S€gtcmbc( 8, 2O0El . ldahoslal€am.m
f-pq.l
ladmncrs,
Yaluc,:
*6o4t
nmblrvaytoog;'
Dilbddfudrrclacrr.lso
Ptr*rdn{codilons
fb iuaclqc ibclb csi
nrtd to oct $1 nillitn to
offcr,
mdd
crr.
1 tli* thb rill [cb rnort it
ugEsudyr$ihfttftl
[aidiu,' dc *'ead !dd. 1 iur
tDi*fiuirycufupGqle
uadcrsod t[b int iuc r
Mai&
ia im. It's r nginrl Iw. Ifs
proicr theirnthnd+nmcdl hvohc .
'Io ca-tiutbuild a
aisofmbfuy&rad
thl{lfrrlhairrhle'
Dniss{ildcv&pcnanhp
hgthkcmih*knrilspart
cmuitnby?!06rffi7.
Sbsaidftre,dderdDo
lice scrricc'vrll hzve adcriE-
dalof ,Ominhr Krcc&sid 6c
rcrt
inta-
chryedqcditto0il,'h
eA crn ftoo &c Dot& rod of ilcd&
Indditlntoth developcrd iutothsoo$eod.
IIDrnld rcd ao ati- To}ffirq$timb
$nenoesqloeth aa&Iyiw,' deYoadsid,XB
so cruirl lca't -f[.thr thzt
A rcprt rpprovcd in 2001by
COMPASSpoiffcd to the inta-
dqcramppkrityohm
phtdbrm,Tlctroicct,h-
m,mrrhrbcat*drrpi
uityfcth$lctr nspatdim
&i*cC0I(PAS$arcgiml
bodt chrsd rie ocdia*iag
pldqfrrtrqdtdidL
Ar plauiAls crolvsd, th
TaMihlro&gcirypLilcd
ocditrpopodhhbttlirc
rrfic coosdknrith ra ova-
proict, hlclt froE Hrnll hif
ray funding urccs. Fa ti* to
Project Size: Approximately one million square feet of proposed shops, pads,
entertainment and anchors.
Property Size: t 1 14 acre s
Zoning: PAD, City of Tucson
Pricing: Call for Pricing
Demographicsr
Contact:
Rondolph C. Titzck, P. C./RTilzck@londodvisors.com
John C. Kolil, PLC/JKolll@londodvisors.com
ffice 480.483.8 I 00/Fax 480.483.0000
4900 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 3000
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
www.landadvisors.com
Traffic Counts:
**lnlerslqle 1O: !72,867 VPD
**Kino Porkwoy:136,548 VPD
"Pork Avenue: 124, 395 VPD
'tAveroged troflic counts generoted by Costor on 9/29/08
Comments:
. Located in a dense infill section of South Tucson
. One mile of frontage along lnterstate 10
. Two lnterstate 1 0 interchanges at the east and west ends of the project
. Part of a master planned community with KB Homes and the University of
Arizona
. Located adjacent to the new proposed University of Arizona Research Center
. Located two miles south of downtown Tucson
. Located two miles from the Tucson lnternational Airport
. Part of the Empowerment Zone Tax lncentive Program (subject to change)
Land Adrzlstrr-s
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
Regional Power Center at NWC of lnterstate 10 and Kino Parkway Tucson, Arizona
/l\
'Eslimoted 2008 Populolion
rEsllmoled 2008 Household lncome
*STDgonline
5 Mlle
1263,116
54s,234
l0 Mlle
1638,814
sss,877
Trode Areo
t676,334
557,229
I ilI \UIliN \\I\I\\
C]TC=ANIZA.TIEN
I
I
i
i;t'rtrtt3 : I zoD>3r
;=l ;
? i 3 3 3t
,I IE A
,'- L_ c
,i
I
e
E
o
t1
F}
I
t
c' (-.l l
Ul o
:l
.za
6i
?
{
I
EI ts
)
ri
,l
If.
'' :i. !
I
rl
I
oo
0)
E 0)
Br
nl nlu
>E
Z>
It {-0 u
o'I
ZA
i_
i
1
E
i
I
i
i
7
tI
t
I
I
Ii
8
!
I
3
!
t
t
x
tt
t
t
t
tI
rq
9
I
I
!
tts
iI
t
E
t
'
t
l,
I9
!
:
T
T
tI
i
$
t
E
I
t
t.
,
,
I
I
I
)
l
ass
oo
+
o
o
>
a
Q
r0
/t
_t}[vENu-E-
lr )
I
I
lr I
tl
I
iil-.
t'
aa
-I
r' t
1., ,, I
|I - -u
P
-t
t
,&*
, /\
/t )
'l
lr ii
'
s,rn \'
:, '_;41,=' ,:,., z :
a
't
t
_'1.
:
C
e)
ct) oz.
=I
mx
{T
r-
om
-{
-{
=tTt
@
-C) :D
rn
CJ)
I
tI
///
!
E
i
tI
E
t\
lfrT t{
t .*
\l. -\
I
t
'!
F
f
l"
I
{
t {
f,I
t!
t
(
I ,F,'t fi
i
'T
,"1
fi
t
ta ,t,
i'l .J I It t
I
I I
i' I
I
{
t
t
t
I
,
I
This is a graphical reprasentation of the anceptual site plan. 36th street
--i.+
t
-:
t(
iI
t
(
i(
I
rI t Sirrclair PAD lllustrativc Sitc plan
ti
-Jl(l
Not to kah
March 6, 2006
e
H x
I
I
i
f; a
c
E':
-, {
Cs
:D
m
tr m
c) m
-2-{
rm
o
sts
H$
t-t
t, I
lr"!
1l
l.!-,
r.l t
6
t ,r'
t-rt t-t
\
t
I
o
li
f,
L
,
a._
I
t a
A
,/-r)-
I
/
ffi
ffi
t
ilHili ilc..
l*-*-[
gfig f,aEEf,] ig;ud€8rnE EEgFf,
e,eX[ E* E a ; t E
i
:=!si. , r- E F ; I
t
o
T
oE
E
0
aI
a
aIa
a
!tm
EtE
.Ese _rt g
;.t
I
I
F !
5'
t t
v
?
tr z
tIl
2
x
s
!,
+
c: =
I
t.
i: o
+
7
__I
*t
rn
Z
r-,(
rn
z
-rn l
nF
rJ.
oEz]
CA
a rn
3
r)
F
rn
rJ
F..
z
E,
I
?
I
o
:
c,
a
,
,6
I
I
I
I
o2
I
a
I
I
a
a
I
a
t
t
!
xT
T
o
3
,oI
t
,
E,
I
T
t
,
I
I
I
I
rv
z, g
o
6
A
-n
F
xz
r
2
-
/
E
I
)
$II2
c= qN
-
l'r
I
,'I I
I
T
]v
L
'r1
xt
'Ia'
I
I.r
I
I
!
_t t
'r)
t
i
Fv
.l_-tr
T ]EN MILE RD.
#
fH
f't Eer
'&H€ *t t -! r
'tctrtrd GPr#%
iie*-E-s { i
4fl..e
tlrr
&l|tl
!'&iI
d pr
.l
o
s
ltt..i.t. Br.'i .t.4 .
.t L'
-.t Bt&. r.
I
,'t I l g
o
A
s ry-'l
,
3-a -{ gT
1_ _a *
I\
o
o I
p rJ
b
l.
?
b
) t,
Er
.l
.1l
L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
dl
it
{r
o
i I
c)
o I
,
.f
-{
aI
E
6)
o- CT. I.
-J
oq
.U
-t
-a
JI
(-)
o ra
ao -
*(, e il i, H tr q
4 F
E i ; i
=
g1.'a A- a il E =
=.4 5Ifr- -
f6g*t EiEn t e
[[[[= EFio
EF: F*E aka6
F[
=
.Is?[# ;r E E I s
+q ? i
ng#+R, H 'frfi 5-:rr ; ;i+IE3E q%ri e-
.rEe gEE' 7 nl.a o S Efi A FJ _a E _ 6 $E.o H*$ r" . \H I -.
\1 )t-rt
Orr::.U?--'.r
EoqY'd r-O
a 0r
J4
-l
VI -
.U
c)
C
o- I.T.
JI
gq
E
-I
-a
-J
(-)
''io I'
aor
EHgEff 1[rL 1F
1a.n Er *=iF s*
s; I E L 3 f; ?=E I
E n._'. H r€
p H
E g-
ds AETE3I
=; =;
Ei.
E o- ='= =
i=;=
Fi;-d t+i *
aT.rrtoo='iiiJ,[il -roJ igt T
=*€-e
=fii
ai- EE' rfi ha fi i o- FEi_ n:Ain fi g t = [
Ee BE =-=- L = 8_X= ;
r gJ q8-l-lr.i r r O- O
Exhibit A.4: Future Land Use Map (FLUM)
&
i
E1c
I
1 I T
illi \
! L-
t=E
,
L------
I
J.**-
L
Ien Mile Center AZ-14-001
PAGE 14
2
tr
Itl tI
DT
WAve Pine Ave e
E
E
.N
z,
o
o
I
I
J
l
I
j
cI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
-!-rrrr{
=
o-
-J
E.
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I ---
I
I
I
I
fl
/eI
---i
I
I
Eta:I a'tfttlil.E
lffi 'm
,m
a
asa D
i
;
$
$
\
Exhibit A.3: Transportation System Map (Comprehensive Plan)
Lagand
t
a
t
+
rl
o
I
2
I
a
3
t
Rffi
tdbig,*
afrt$p
2 ftrgs
I Srgq
-
&br{ *
I
tE
tE
i|iE*l{Fp dd
PffitgrUQ \I
1
E ir L&r
ft@{P-ry
-o--
ft{dcdt t
T (
+ **
a
t
Ten Mile Center AZ-14-001
PAGE I I
a
R.:
Rt
c-c
(
R-ls
T
RI
I-L
*",i rfl-"]
RI
d
TN.R
T\--C
c-c
RTT
i""="- t{-E
RR
\--=! :
Tli{
Th'R
Ten Mile Center AZ- I 4-00 I
PAGE 9
Exhibit A. 1 : Vicinity lZoning l{hp
Rl
c4
R-t
Rl0
R15
\
Changes to Agenda: None
Item #8A: Revolution Ridge Subdivision (FP-14-022)
The applicant submitted a letter in agreement with the staff report after the deadline for the consent agenda.
Item #88: Sagewood Subdivision (FP.14.023)
Application:
Location: The site is located on the south of W. Pine Avenue between N. Black Cat Road and N. Ten Mile Road.
Summary of Request: The applicant requests approval of a final plat consisting of 2 office lots, 45 residential lots and 8 common lots
on approximately 15.62 acres of land in the L-O and R-8 zoning districts. The proposed open space complies with the overall prqect
open space approved with the Sagewood development. Staff finds the proposed final plat is in substantial compliance
with the
approved preliminary plat.
Written Testimony: Becky McKay, in agreement dstaff report, with corrections to site speciflc conditions #17 & 18.
Staff Recommendation: Staff has amended site specific condition #17 & 18 to reflect the correction requested by the applicant which
will be included in the findings document.
Item #8C: Ten Mile Center (AZ-14-001)
Application:
The City Council heard the annexation and zoning request for this property on May 6th. At that meeting, the Council continued the public
hearing to the June 3d meeting. The Council requested staff work with the applicant to include provisions in the development agreement
(DA) that will ensure a transition between the adjacent rural neighborhood and the proposed TN-R and TN-C zoned areas through open
space and/or zoning.
-C,rt
Based on discussions with staff and testimony a/the Council hearing, the applicant has submitted revised DA provisions th^r#{{rff
concerns of the neighbors and the City Council.' Staff is in agreement with the changes proposed by the applicant.(€effi)
?*ht
The Council also requested information from ACHD on what might occur in the future in this area in regard to street and/or sidewalk
improvements. Christy Little provided the following information:
a
a
There is currently curb, gutter and sidewalk along the north side of Waltman Lane from Linder Road to the west side of the
schoolsite.
There is nof curb, gutter and sidewalk on the north side of Waltman Lane in front of the three parcels between the
school site
and the Ten lt/ile Center site which consists of approximately 450 feet.
An option to complete these off-site improvements may be to ask the developer to complete the improvements and ACHD could
reimburse them as a Developer Cooperative prolect.
There are no plans to improve or widen the south side of Waltman Lane.
a
,ecr/ -ry
On/,Y
tennr{t' JtA"r*'
T*W lra'ttrrrt/ ?
117*rt'ha
n6h_
a
On-+ 10 # 0/S
Item #7D: Ten Mile Center (AZ-14-001)
Application(s):
> Annexation & Zoning
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of
'120.69 acres, is cunently zoned RUTinAdaCounty, and is
located on the east side of S. Ten Mile Road midway between l-84 & W. Franklin Road.
Summary of Request: The applicant proposes to annex and zone the site as follows: 81.35 acres located in the LC (63 acres), HDR
(15+l acres), and [,,lHDR (1.5+l acres) designated areas to C-G; 14.5+l acres located in the HDR
(5.5+/- acres) and IVHDR (3.8+l
acres) designated areas to TN-C; 1 1 .5+/- acres located in the IVDR designated area to TN-R; and 13.23 acres located in the MDR
designated area to R-8.
A conceptual development plan was submitted that depicts a future street layout for the site consistent with the transportation plan for
this area. However, no building pads, parking or future uses are shown on the plan.
Residential uses at up to 8 dwelling units per acre are proposed to develop in the R-8 district. A minimum of 95 residential units are
proposed in the TN-R district in addition to other uses as allowed in the zone; and a minimum of 300 residential units are proposed to
develop in the C-G and/or TN-C zoned areas combined.
Conceptual building elevations were not submifted. Future development of the site, including structures, should be consistent with the
provisions of the UDC, the Meridian Design Manual, and the design elements contained in the TMISAP. Further details of these desrgn
elements are included in the proposed DA provisions listed in exhibit A.6.
A multi-use pathway is required across this site connecting Peregrine Elementary to Ten Mlle & Franklin Roads in accord with the
Pathways Master Plan.
Commission Recommendation: Approval
a. Summary ii. i. ln ln favor: opposition: of Commission Eric Davis; Jeanette Becky Public Ockerman McKay Hearing: (speaking for group); Dennis Gerosin; Dawn Downum; Cinde Atwood; Ron
Hohnstein;
iii.lVcNulty Jennifer Commenting: Johnson; Sarah Margaret Weekes lVoser; Christine Lambing; Steve Osbum; John Mabbutt; Doug Thompson; Angie
iv. Written testimony: Jim Wolf; Gary & Kay Fors; Jeanette Ockerman; a petition signed by adjacent residents (in opposition
of the high level of residential density & the access to Waltman Lane); Craig Downum; Dawn Downum; Sharon Osburn;
Maggie Weeks; Margaret Moser; and Dave Dansereau.
b. ii. Key i. Trafflc Concern lssue(s) impacts of regarding Discussion on the the adjacent by potential Commission:rural for 300 residential dwelling neighborhood units to develop and
in roads the TN-at C the district southeast vs. spread comer out of the over site;the TN-C and C-
G iv. iii. The lmpact districts importance of additional (wording of creating of residential DA provision a transition dwellings 14.1.and 6 in in this compatible Exhibit area 4.on 6)uses
the ; school at an appropriate system; and scale adjacent to existing residential
properties.
c. Key Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation:
i'l\,4odifyconditionslI4.1.4&4.1,6asrequestedbytheapplicantasshowninExhibitA.6.
d. outstanding rssue(s)for city do;r"i;,";i"i-;-' 'npei';;;^;"
)i' iiit-il+r"nttTtrw)
i None fr-traryitmthdc'trf-tV -lo'yr
l"fi il*] ftu7dt
Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Gary & Kay Fors; Jeanette Ockerman w/petition
Notes: - /tr- R_E nded 1" ,,ce't+
7t cance.f+ lan
+k an 6 ha,sr
Nm4
n{fn
DartrLPrt
Lfir/bJ
o)ecrlt
of_
2
61rrt"
0n/;e
S*tw
Pe MoEr fn lvte
-t,
{ -^4
Meridian City Council
May 6, 2014
Page 40 of 66
[\Iadam [Vlayor, I move that we continue this public hearing and ask the staff to put a
finer fine point on some of the development agreement conditions with respect to open
space and zoning and ask the developer,and staff to take a look : a better look at the
transition between the rural neigHporhood and the TN-R and TN-C area of this
development and identify open spacd. Also working with ACHD to get a handle on what
might occur in the future and -
anythirg else that l'm missing? lthink those are the
points that need addressing. j
Zaremba: Second and discussion, please
De Weerd: Okay.
Zaremba'. I did not hear the maker of the motion mention a date certain. I would
suggest that it be Wednesday, the 21st, which is -- we have a meeting next week, but
normally don't have public hearings on that meeting. lt's a workshop during the day.
On the 20th is actually an election day, so that we don't have our meeting on that
Tuesday, we move it to Wednesday, and I'm suggesting the date certain to continue this
to would be Wednesday, May 21st.
Rountree: The maker of the motion agrees
De Weerd: Okay
Zaremba: Second agrees
De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second to continue this item to May 21st.
Borton. Madam Mayor?
De Weerd: [Vl r. Borton
Borton:
the sch
I was going to add to Councilman Rountree's list the pedestrian connectivity to
ool site. This is one of the items as well.
Zaremba: Thank you
Borton: And, then, within the development agreement there is language with regards -
it's all over - all over with
regards to the Ten Mile area specific plan. That's kind of
loosely vague and wiggly. lf you could -
Section 4.1 .4 and the other - the components with that that address direction how change that plan that is language applied -
to
the C-G and the TN-C, try and put a little more teeth into the obligations of the ultimate
developer to comply with that Ten Mile area plan.
Watters: Madam Mayor, Councilman Borton, is the Council asking for a concept plan or
not? lt's loose because there is no concept plan. lt's very hard to write a development
Planner: Date: Date of List:
Project Name: 7n Mile- (r,a-ltr
Fire sentative:
Notes:
A B C D
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 l1 12 13 14 15 16 t7 19 20
21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 JJ 35 36 37 38 39 40
41 +.5 44 45 46 48 49
Police
Notes:
ve
B D E
71 72 74 75 76 77 78
Sani Services sentative:
Notes:
A B C
1 2 97
Parks sentative:
Notes:
6 46 47 79 80 81 82 83 84 85
Public Works
Notes:
1 2 J 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 t4 15 16 17
18 19 20
2t 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30
Rev. 6/6/1 2
ve
City of Meridian Development Review
Agency Comments Meeting
6 18
24 5+
47
f-T-- [t
A C
73
T_T_- T--r-T_I l
3 98
L_T_-]
5
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
From Linder to the west, there is curb, gutter and sidewalk on the north side only up to the west property line of the
school. Thereare3parcelswestoftheschool before theTen Mile Centersite, a pproximately 450-feet. WhentheTen
Mile site develops, we could ask the developer to complete the improvements offsite for 450-feet and we could
reimburse them (Developer Cooperative project). There are no plans to improve or
widen the south side of Waltman.
Christy
From: Sonya Watters Imailto:swatters@meridiancity.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2074 l:54 PM
To: Christy Little
Subject: Ten I\4ile Center AZ-14-007
Christy,
ls there anything in the plan to widen Waltman from Linder to the Ten Mile Center site? Or would there be if this
property is annexed?
Tha nks,
Sonya
1
Christy Little < Clittle@achdidaho.org >
Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:39 AM
Sonya Watters
RE: Ten Mile Center AZ-14-001
Tttn Mile Czo&
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
I will do that Jeanette. Thanks so much I
From: Jeanette Ockerman [mailto:ockermanj@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2074 4i04 Pl4
To: Machelle Hill
Subject:
Machelle,
Could you please send this letter to the city council in regards to the Ten Mile Center Application up for review
on May 6? I have included it as an attachment as well as the petition signed by people in the neighborhood.
Thank you.
I am also concerned that there is no plat or site map for the community to
see what the developer has in
mind, especially in regards to 300 residential units being added in non-residential areas[i][i].
Without a site
map there is no way to see how the TN-c, TN-R and R-8 zones will transition from the aJjacent
rural
neighborhoods and still maintain their desired residential densities. For the reasons
listed above lfeel the
current zoning application should be denied.
What follows are the specifics to my reasoning:
1
Machelle Hill
Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:23 AM
'Jeanette Ockerman'
Sonya Watters
RE:
J eanette Ockerman
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to you because I have very serious concerns about the proposed zoning for the Ten Mile Center
by Treasure Valley lnvestments. My concerns lie with the changes from the land designations in the Ten Mile
Specific Area Plan (hereafter called TMP) done in 2007 and the zoning being requested.
I am not opposed to future development along the Ten Mile Corridor or to the change in land designation
from a Lifestyle Center like the Village to a more commercial use. However, I believe that some of the changes
in zoning will negatively impact existing neighborhoods, roads and schools. I think that the intent of the
Future Land Use Plan (FLUM) for the development of our community, in this specific area, is being lost.
Some of the zoning being requested does not adhere to the intended use under the Ten Mile Specific Area
Plan; specifically the loss of L7.2 acres of land designated as Medium Density Residential to higher density
residential and commercial uses; TN-R and TN-C zones. These changes will negatively impact the
primrose
Subdivision, Waltman and Lilac Lane and peregrine
Elementary School.
The Ten Mile lnterchange Specific Area Plan (TMP)[ii][ii] was developed to manage growth throughout the
city while also maintainlng compatibility with current development. The 120.69 acres of land being reviewed
was designated with 63.3 acres of a Lifestyle Center (LC); 20.3 acres of High Density Residential (HDR); 5.1
acres Medium High Density Residential (MDHR); and 30.4 acres as Medium Density Residential (MDR) under
the Future Land Use Map for the TMP.
The zoning before you will be changing the 63.3 acres of LC to 80+ acres of Commercial (CG) and eliminating
the HDR zone.[iii] [iii] I do not have a problem with
removing the HDR, but that does not appear to be what it is
happening. The HDR is being shifted around with 300 residential units being put in an undesignated area
somewhere in the CG and TN-C Zones; most likely forcing up all other zoning areas to th eir maximum capacity
due to the fact that in a CG zone, residential housing is not a permitted use and would require a developer to
get conditional use permits to add residential unlts. HDR and Commercial zoning are completely different land
uses. As residents, lthink we should know exactly where the additional 300 residential units are going before
the land is zoned. lt would require 15 acres of HDR at an average of 20 units per acre to keep the 300 units in
one area.
ln addition, the definition of a TN-C zone very closely follows the definition of the Lifestyle Area[iv][iv]. Why is
the TN-C being put in an area that was designated for residential use when there are 63 acres of LC are on the
FLUM? lf a TN-C is supposed to be the "focal point of a neighborhood center", why is this mixed use
commercial zone being tucked back, over half way into the development, in land designated as residential on
the FIUM?
My next and even bigger concern is the change of MDR from 30.4 acres to 13.23 acres; a loss of 77.17 acres of
MDR to a higher density TN-R and TN-C zones. This loss will not only affect our neighborhood, roads, and
school; but it will change the entire feel of the area. Meridian is known for its neighborhoods; for the sense of
community and stability they engender. The 30.4 acres of MDR represents a stable neighborhood being lost in
our area. MDR areas contain mostly single family homes and encourage home ownership. The MDR zone is
what creates a stable and secure community; the type of environment families like to have next to their
schools. But in thls application much of the MDR is being replaced with commercial and higher density
residential zones; TN-C and TN-R.
The change of MDR to TN-R and TN-C will also negatively impact the existing roads; putting more stress and
pressure on roads that already has traffic problems due to a local school. The current layout of the zones
on
the application has the MHDR[v][v] zone exiting directly onto a neighborhood road[vi]lvil. The Future Land
Use Plan has the higher density residential areas either between the major arterial roads or to the west of
them, thus encouraging residents to use these main roads to exit their homes.
Although there will still be arterial roads north to Franklin and west to Ten Mile, the higher density area or TN-
R is now east of all the roads including a smaller connecting road into the Primrose Subdivision. lt is very likely
that many residents will choose to use Waltman and Lilac Lanes since those roads directly access their
development and give residents direct connection to peregrine
Elementary School.
The potential increase in traffic will have a huge impact on the Primrose Subdivision; changing a quiet
neighborhood with a extremely low crime rate to a through street that will connect new development on the
2
The 300 residential units could potentially end up in the 14.34 acres of TN-C. A TN-C contains a mix of
commercial and residential uses. Often the residential units are above the businesses on the second floor or
higher. How high will the buildings have to go to get 300 units in that area? At the very least there should be
a
plat design to show what the developer / land owner has in mind for these 300 residential units before the
land is zoned.
west (the zoned area)to existing neiShborhoods east of Linder. Currently allthe neighborhoods east of Linder
only have one exit to Franklin Road; and that is north on Linder Road. There is no other way out of the
subdivisions. Opening up Waltman Road with direct access to the TN-C and then CG Zones, as well as the Ten
Mile lnterchange, could turn a neighborhood street into a heavily used access road. This will not only be a
potentialtraffic problem but an increased safety problem for residents and students alike.
According to Mindy Wallace at ACHD, the average traffic count on Waltman Road, 3 years ago in March 2011
was 1089 cars per day. Since then the student population at Peregrine Elementary has increased and so has
the traffic. Waltman Road has been a quiet neighborhood street for over 30 years since the development of
the Primrose Subdivision; connecting Waltman to the new zoning and the existing eastern neighborhoods will
turn it into a busy through street. lf the 30.4 acres of land designated as MDR was maintained as planned on
the FLUM, the traffic would be feeding into another neighborhood. The primary access would no longer be
between a business district, TN-C, that is supposed to be the "focal point" of the area and TN-R zone. The
traffic pattern through the residential neighborhood could then be designed in a way that would discourage
through traffic from using the roads as a shortcut to the business area or the Ten Mile lnterchange.
The changes to the zoning will also affect Peregrine Elementary. The school currently has 600 students with a
capacity of 660-700 students. According to the principal, Geri Gillespy, over half of those students are in a
walking zone. The school has walkways on the east and north ofthe school. This new development shows a
path planned for the western side of the school. However, Mrs. Gillespy, the principal states that, "most of the
students are dropped off or picked up by parents". Although many children can walk, an estimated 300; "most
parents" choose to drive their children. The other 300 arrive at school by bus. I believe this pattern will
continue with the new development. As parents in the MHDR residential head to work or out in the morning
they will access Waltman road to drop off their children at the school, just as "most parents" currently
do, and
pick them up again in the afternoon; creating increased traffic problems.
According to Eric Exline, Public lnformation Officer at Meridian School District, the district uses a multiplier of
.8 to calculate how many students will be added to a new development. lf the 30.4 acres were maintained at
an average of 6 homes per acre, there would be a total of 67 students[vii] [vii]
added to the elementary school.
However changing the zoning to 13.23 of MDR and adding the 11.5 TN-R (average density is L2 units); the total
student would be 80 studentslviiil [viii]; an increase of 20%. lncluding the additional
300 residential units will
increase the student population by 139 children;Iix][ix] for a grand total of 219[x]txl students potentially
attending Peregrine Elementary under the current application; increasing the student population well over the
700 capacity-the more residential units, the more students and thus the more traffic and safety problems.
lf the applicant wants the higher density residential/com mercia I zones (TN-C and TN-R), they should stay in
the areas desi8nated on the FLUM so that the main roads can distribute the traffic as planned by the FLUM
developers. I believe the traffic patterns and residential densities were evaluated at the time the FLUM was
designed and that it was never the intent to turn Waltman or Lilac Lanes into major roads.
putting a TN-C and
a TN-R zone splitting their access with a road into a rural residential neighborhood was never in the original
plan, nor was the extreme, negative impact it would have on the
primrose subdivision.
I believe that there is a better use of the land that would blend growth and development with the
existing
neighborhoods and roads. lt is called the Future Land Use Map. The FLUM reflects the transition in
land
desisnations while maintaining the integrity of the neighborhoods. please
do not allow the drive for
commercial zones and high density residential areas to eat up land intended for a medium density residential
neighborhoods Meridian is known for its sense of community, for its neighborhoods and the stability they
bring to the city. I believe there is room for compromise between commercial uses and traditional
neighborhoods; I believe that a better zoning proposal could be developed that would balance
the desire for
3
growth and the impact on the Primrose Subdivision and Waltman and Lilac Lanes; a plan that would route
traffic away from and not through the neighborhood; a plan that would allow for more transition from a rural
neighborhood to residential and then business districts.
I believe there is room for compromise with the existing application; a "sweet spot" that will address public
concerns and maintain neighborhood communities. As do the over 60 people that signed a petition in
opposition to the current application.
Please do not accept the Ten Mile Center Application in its current form!
Sincerely yours,
Jea nette Ockerman
2070W.Waltman
Meridian, lD 83642
(Enclosu re- Petition [xi] [xi] )
Ii] [i] Ten Mile Center AZ-14-OO1 Revised Staff Report, p. 8.
Iii][ii]Ten Mile Center AZ-14-OO1 Revised Staff Report, p.3.
I iii] [iii] ren Mile
Center AZ-14-OO1 Revised Staff Report, p. 8.
I iV] [ivl Ten Mile
Center AZ-14-OO1 Revised Staff Report, p. 3,7.
[v][v] I am using TN-R and MHDR residential interchangeably because the density levels for both are 8-15 residential units with an
average of 12); so the zoning for TN-R is Medium High Density Residential (MHDR).
Ivi][vi]Ten Mile Center AZ 14-001 Revised Staff Report, p. 11.
[vii][vii] (30.a acres x 6 average residential units x.8 multiplier/
13 grades x 6 grades in school
= 67.3 students). I have not included
the calculations for the HDR because the developer does not seem to want to use this land designation.
[viii]lviiil [(13.23 x6x.8/ 13 x 6) + (11.s x 12 x.8/13x6) +
= 29.3 +51
= 80.3 students 218.8students]
I ix] [ix]
(300 / 13 x 6)
= 138.s
Ix][x] 80.3 + 138.5 =
218.8 srudents
[xi][xi]The main purpose ofthe petition
is to reflect the concerns and opposition to the current zoning and
jts impact on ad.jacent
neighborhoods. The petition was collected by multiple sources. some people
signed as a couple on one line, while others signed two
different times. There is some margin of error in the total # but it is roughly 60 people.
Sonya Watters
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Mindy Wallace < Mwallace@achdidaho.org >
Monday, March 03, 20L4 L:39 PM
'Jeanette Ockerman'
Sonya Watters
RE: Ten Mile Center - AZ-14-001 (Treasure Valley Investments)
MAZ-14-001.pdf
Jeanette,
The draft staff report is attached, this information has already been provided to the City of Meridian. ln regards to
improvements to Waltman Road we talked about two things. Offsite improvements that may be required when the Ten
Mile Center property is preliminary platted and ACHD's Community Programs.
When ACHD is transmitted the preliminary plat application for the Ten Mile Center, we will go out and take a look at the
site. At that time we will decide if off-site improvements are warranted. Based on the current traffic volumes on
Waltman Lane the following Offsite lmprovement Policy would apply:
District Policy 7207.2.3 Off-site Streets: lf the proposed development is not served by a public street with a minimum of
3o-feet of pavement, then the developer shall pave the street or widen the existing pavement to provide
3o-feet of
pavement with 3-foot gravel shoulders from the site to a public street specified by the District; OR shall provide 24-feet
of pavement with 3-foot gravel shoulders and a minimum 6-foot wide detached aspha lt/concrete pedestrian facility
from the site to a public street specified by the District.
As we talked about on Friday several of your neighbors have encroachments within the rlght-of-way, which makes
offsite improvements more difficult. Any required offsite improvements would be typically be funded by the applicant,
not the adjacent home owners.
Please let me know if you have any otherquestions.
Mindy
Mindy Wallace, AICP
Pla nner lll
Ada County Highway District
(208) 387-6178
"We drive quality transportation for all Ada County
_ Anytime...Anywhere !,,
1
ACHD's Community Programs is the process in which you apply for the program and
your neighbors would also have to
agree to allow sidewalk construction. ACHD has a funding for these project. The link to the website is below.
http://www.achd ida ho.orslcommunitv/Defa ult.aspx
Mindy,
Thank you for answering my questions Friday. Could you send me the comments from
ADHD that are
being added to the application under the "agencies conditions of approval" section?
I also forgot to ask you who would bear the cost of curbs, gutters. and sidewalks on Waltman Road to
make it safer and more equipped to handle the increase in traffic? If it is the homeowners, what is the
cost per foot? Could any cost to upgrade the road be something that is required of the developers and
included by the ACHD in the application before it is approved?
Thanks,
Jea nette
From: Jeanette Ockerman <ockermanj@yahoo.com>
To: l\4indy Wallace <lvlwallace@achdidaho.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: Ten lvlile Center - M-14-001 (Treasure Valley lnvestments)
Mindy,
My name is Jeanette Ockerman. I own one of the adjacent properties to the annexation.
Could you tell me if a recent usage analysis has been done for Linder and Waltman roads? And if so the
number of cars utilizing the roads each day?
I am also interested to know if your office does some sort of evaluation of what would be the top capacity
for usage on the existing roads? And how will the proposed annexation increase traffic on those roads?
I would appreciate any information you can give me. Thank you.
Jeanette Ockerman
From: Mindy Wallace <Mwallace@achdidaho.org>
To:'Becky lvlcKay' <es-beckym@qwestoffice.net>
Cc: "ockermanj@yahoo.com" <ockermanj@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, Februaty 24,2014 '10:55
AM
Subject: RE: Ten Mile Center - M-14-OO1 (Treasure Valley lnvestments)
Thanks Becky,
We wouldn't nomally get into that level of detail with the affrexation and rezone application
since we don,t
have any conditions of approval. We will certainly keep this in mind.
Mindy
2
From : Jeanette Ockerman Imailto:ockermanj@yahoo.com]
Senti Sunday, March 02, 2Ol4 7i10 Pl4
Toi Mindy Wallace
Subject: Re: Ten Mile Center - AZ-14-001 (Treasure Valley Investments)
Mindy Wallace, AICP
Planner III
Ada County Highway District
(208) 387-6178
"We drive quality transportation for all Ada County -- Anytime...Anywhere!"
From: Becky McKay [mailto:es-beckym@qwestoffice.net]
Sent: Monday, February 24,201410:53 AM
To: Mindy Wallace
Cc: ockermanj@yahoo.com
Subject: Ten Mile Center - AZ-14-001 (Treasure Valley Investments)
Mindy
I know you are currently working on the staff report for the Ten Mile Center project. I wanted to let you know
we requested a deferral at the Planning and Zoning Commission to the March 2}th.I had an opportunity to
discuss the existing transportation system with the neighbors. They had some concerns and wanted me to
inform the District of these issues.
1. Waltman Lane is currently a substandard rural section and additional traffic should not be
added to the street.
2. The existing elementary School traffic creates problems for residents.
3. The elementary has had to modiff its intemal transportation plan due to problems with buses
exiting the site.
4. The adjoining residents do not want any vehicular connection to Waltman or Lilac from the
Treasure Valley project.
5. Waltman Lane has some storm drainage problems where water is ponding.
I told the residents that I would pass their information to the District.
Thanks,
Becky McKay, Partner
Engineering Solutions, LLP
1029 N. Rosario Street, Suite 100
Meridian, ID 83642
Phone: (208) 938-0980
Fax: (208) 938-0941
E-Mail: es-beckym@qwestoffice.net
3
L
i%
+
i----- t
i
i
i
v
7
IA
.,I \ I
a
I
I
a
w
_rl) 1-
rl
t
I
t-----
)
I
I
t
),
,
t
ffin
I
J'
F
dql
.G.
)L-
$lL $
!I
d
fi
mfF
c) m
miz
T
o
sri SE st
a=
E;il !
i E.<;i
T
. :*_ .. . -_-:-_ :
;il (
!f
B!
!
ciYd
_')1, :
c:
t.'
:, -icEF Rtu -?Tt F
-ia t ! co!:a -,e?..5
1.
A
{z
o I
7
II a , I
a
I
@
J
)-
o
*...l-"'.-"_'r
{d
q
,
f
t
,
Lr.
I
rai6k
n f,
t
li$
j\
,i
-t
I
0
i
i
0
I
I
0
I
c
,
t-
I
!
,
,8"*:
I
I
E
a
t
t
,
I
(o o
o
o-
IUl S
tr<oxxo <-
9PPo
o-cc
rc-^
=
L \)
nFo
5BE
e5 <E
oli:l:lile#
d g F
E 5 E 8 H E gE
BE'+gh 9383ile4
"9EE H 8.3
d-J=mB H Ei e
Em)1 gE8
E.f
<tr
ts=
EO
JQ
Oo E€
q3
Dci lxq
Uor
?*ilL o a 3
e
!
rc q
c
-3
=o
o
on =-
2.
oo
=d
st
oI
3
ra
i6= On
o5
€€ 9.6
llr Jcr
6'd
EE
EE
=ho -
ft71
ffiTTTNI
E33aX"geEH$g l
gO$EEE
I q a $ 6E d:
5 EE -
.t,
,6
'*| E
ql
?,
*
,U
3
t
.l
at ,f .t{
I
I
9
I:t t
,E
f
t
I
I
I
I
I
,6
I
:6
I
,I
, a
,
I
I
It
l1
't
,
I
';-t(
I
t
I
,
I
I
I
a,r( I
i_(
I
in
ffi;
L
:l
E
I
a
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
a
5
a
,m rB , a , a
f,
a
o
E
li
tr]
.tf f :
=r.-l ni: l i .
i:
:. _. i.:.,;.- i. _.
a aa
J
!
ii aii ili i
!, :l= i I .it = a .' i i: i - -!-! :
:' : ii i i;i:! :;
=i a :.:i,
i: i!
c)
2o
ror'
!
-t
-m -CJ) {
-o
=
-l
e
C)
o
=t')
o
ic,
c
o)
(rl
o =
'r,
o) :,
Er
nlu nl
>tL
z>
{It u
u't -E
ZN
F
tgi
:]
i
a
l,
\
t'
l'
f'
t'
t
t
l
!
E
!
I
I
t
{[
* l4
t
1.,
t
-o
o
E
o
oo
9_
o OJ
a)
o
:f
o
E
c
o)
o)
(D
=OJ
f
|-
0t l
0.
B
<-
UI
'ol
u
o
B
z
N
l
o
z
hppco,COHPASSadIIDm*
li*thcptflrtr agixity.
Ea& ytar, IID anl COI{PASS
cratc fiY*rcrr inprorcodd
plctrErfumbpauu
rmdFtf't61odticfrocrTo
rccivcfiarlreyftxrptu
iect, COXPASS ud IID m*
cooqh.'
If thilcrchaae
6ixrannhift,
aldddd
fficnild
trtg,cowollc
@crm-oddrdqlm
on EAh Ro.d eDd 56,000 ou
Mctidiu nmdi! th Et 20
AlAdrcmtytlilhllt Dtu-
uid strdl cudod 51.S0 ca: m
E+Roeduthof I{4oooc
dry h Auga$ mol Morc rhrn
,lL,*00 carc rcrc countod on
ifmrymninioptwros
mndrudgror&ffitrc,
llrlidhn nod Dcth o(l-t{ dm
dryiuu}r4oL
Develope/s offer boosts COIOASScrhn*3ho"td
Ten Mile lnterchange idea
lgccothpoitrt'lpkrity.
&odleriil6cTcaldcpru
in &o mdd hvotvc E0hil-
lfonof&riryovcocnrofo
idathosdMaidiaRm4a
wdla $nillfonfq ddfriond
Economicimpact
lessfaffc seen as
positivestoplan
a, Xrdfcr rh0.r
xlatDl^t.-Idrbt6-
Ft{ioo oaiaiali ac<sfl-
dia r lJ Eiltba clcr ,@
ddcloDcB ro Llp build .
Hldd&&atEa(is
! T6 llilc Rqd ia Bt
liaaiCiu
I( rhd d(n $c..cda t
cqJd b.lptrds! a.rfr@-
sri@ o! bury E{lc sd
}tdA:ro rord* :!a o9<! s9
r K Fn o{ xdidi.i ro r
bir o(@cirl &d r.::
Grc&rd.Fa
iltc iDr(.\.B l&{ly
rq.ldb.l9iqft lh.h<d
w.ddAliB6:ldrr.
9rdciry{iiy 6co3s-
I,AsIos Asido: o{
serbftrr ldrbo (cost.
PASS).
'lt lirb. Ddity o(de
rtis @cirl ad.B-
Dhrrd(qll'Tb.&dG'lbrt& EIBBK &
F.drrl rb{ &fr t&;E}ar
Es:!ab@-
h'clof syoslL.
Ep opc*{. <o8clcrt
otJ sr b...lr rlo9ti4
dcdLtbaircrd
cidffirob..offiGt
H!qibd&r- d*rd
ProFcfed cocfs
lrnc or{-81fr0n Tco Mih to
llaidhlood
hthcrc, Tleeatdliryodidht ycas
redbpiilofutr4d,'!cdd
Dm*dr*lhcgcd&rry
grda drdeidhrl!lilcrclnScto llaidira !rusr.
bstfupr*uhrstofitn.
t---'r' T,:$:rrhlm: rhare
ahw dI;resct d'bnci tk
Tepnxidh'dmlb.
TREASI.IREVALLEY
tl* ldjroSu:Efln h L.tut€*
Edh in rtE Tr.evallryr# iE@ta
hnB-ld r.d..t a
Soma'ffitldie
>Ccildaai.* TEdacr$baB.
fr u! llx.bReh lEd 9Ln tEtr-
,mi.Elnsslh.cvrniihtq
mu<hol h &.H Vrlkr.
> Trilt .v.rtqf itRguEErhgronE
lffitoffira4n8d*M*et
aM&@.ginraia
>€ff16ltd T,BavrlkystroS.
oot*, |.rltu!6h Viilot !.!abr|8
(.dq.llisiB.d€hwl6.eltins-
ticdkdt*J.dluta
> o9.n*u6dmdl(@e
dcalirErdhtlErrd tdE *5aM-
rffi oa 70Oto 1,0OOlsE.ah.
,htc ofutd to pry fn;.d.&
niniscqrnqfudcqri.@
bliqdshrdt
Alcdtrl&cpirac silc on
garuldoc rllnlc fi$crad
ule mofdclod,'DrrLriit
In 2002, th Xcridiu Cit,
.CotrldrhrdxittErSurc
ProFc.d
isbrcharsa
ttqrlalea(ad.ralffi,a
tJtlom a d tffr lnEcluc.
srlaedrd'w6B
314 oltLEgA, ltlo.E CdeE-
tioo C 16 rtraa RaJ tt4rtartg
aalo&trtEdotodrg
ud- Roa HrrcrEIS
Sdb:WglI€4hTd
l*b b rrdbi$ io*.
IfUcimadryilooluuc-
ddd[crFoicct€qld4
cstbaa SorafoptoffrOO
on drily o F:fr lood rod
10,500ollaltloRod
Deril*f dcimdnpdl
bcDd&ccothcilt,dh$dF
vtlopersdladrrc.
eid Frk DrYL rctlkd oI ltilllrdrcpnsoreoEr
R.!rl q'd ltoFti.a
?bbl,l.r!ls
lrgbouda lnrdentl
ud-rT@oLBldftl-
w.Dlwd tb.F$lk-ri.
v& re6li9 :!d ir $st-
is*irlRoIEdeW.
ri6 oJ 8<ir ia bG3 o( de
E:Bi{ rlqrt 9OO a6 E:
fi31i6.'-rt.' 1e & D:8k
Rold bkrcbrEe Tb., o-
Boa Eikd-u dd.lop
eDt Elcdi{ r.url oo-
ffiirl offft baildis tti
T!. dcth:sr rdld b.
3 Bil6 *ot ot lba <wt.l
Mdidis Rord blarbqs,
r5ic\ dq ritb .b. Edc
Rod lddclqr. oJad !G
d_ossl nll nEb.tdr, 6.f'
Bqirl sid kys Ru<b.
lc. ITD puk rtrrir rpcirl.
i*
'aorrialaw,iftdo
@ frrc.)rr DIE l(chlc
sid-'T5.rc ! Edi.l (s
<\--$.I}c (sr.) eB
ird:En:bk tis! Dt.'
e bDJd:, sil it k lilc
ly & &v.lqB'offd rill
h.lD Bv. rt groid fol-
sd. -AryF
Brlf,bo(riv&
$d F$:k Karilh.!plo
F:i!arb.oS lqrd tb,
6FrrlcT€SGlche
<b* rilt rlo up'o tbc
tt?Fr6ryai6rl4
b. sil- _wc
b:Yc t<o6.
lbriqrly,yuca't&dI6.
cqom dmhncqdyih
sdd.l rnld 6hk Ta Mih
S..lrllElgtrsD{r7
ltlM
Reason # 16
ow&awe!ol
ftMV.{crfrwft
GtrNWF'H
&kutSkr.6\
L,d6ilPs-t& -
T6m:sOof4^t Rd9&,-rhlmxA,:EMhtqi.odei- sGPlsd
rddhthbqLuetr'
MaidhC,Iy Cmohoo
TuoydcWccrd sid 6rTca
lfihiuadrybcnri{top
SIroclacodllddlaI&
ta,dr6 brial1oi4d
iqbumceagi6$driA
tttiraclqe.'
thhih
i
b
F
10!,7
inc, 1055
1056
1090
!
t