HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 3, 2005 P&Z Minutes
Meridian Planning & Zoning
March 3, 2005
Page 56 of 89
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 13:
Public Hearing: PFP 05-001 Request for a Preliminary/Final Plat
approval of 5 building lots on 5.28 acres in a C-C zone for .Bonito
Subdivision No.2 by Kimball Properties - SWC of South Eagle Road
and West Overland Road:
Zaremba: Thank you. We will move on now to Item 13. This is PFP 05-001, request
for a preliminary and final plat approval of five building lots on 5.28 acres in a C-C zone
for Bonito Subdivision No.2 by Temple Properties, southwest comer of South Eagle
Road and West Overland Road. And we will begin with the staff comments.
Guenther: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. This is for a re-subdivision of Lots 4 and 5 of
Bonito Subdivision. This was originally platted on a preliminary plat for EI Dorado
Subdivision and was under the final plat of Bonito One Subdivision. This is for two lots.
The two lots are the lot to the south off of Goldstone and, then, the portion of this one
that is off of Tarpin. Actually, I think I might have just transposed those two streets.
The configuration is as shown and this four or five new lots on these two lots. With this
there is an existing approved access to Eagle Road, as well as for Tarpin and
Goldstone. In discussions with the applicant's representative, there is one condition that
we had discussed that would be preliminary plat general requirement number -- I'm
sorry. I thought it was number three, but I'm not -- number six under preliminarylfinal
plat site-specific comments. The perimeter landscaping, as well as the landscaping
along the - it will be the western border of this subdivision, was already completed
during the final platting phase for Bonito and so this is redundant. It has already been
completed. And the - that was the only comment that was made and staff would
support the removal of condition number six. And at that staff is recommending
approval of this preliminary and final plat.
Zaremba: Okay. Lers see. There is a condition six that relates to fencing and
landscape on page four and on page five there is a condition six. So, that's waterways.
Okay. So, you're referring to the one on page four?
Guenther: On page four, the one that reads a detailed fencing and landscape plan of
MCC 12-13 shall be submitted with the following final plat application. This is the final
plat application as well.
Zaremba: Yes.
Guenther: And the final plat for Bonito No.1 was approved and has been installed
already.
Zaremba: Any questions from the Commissioners? Okay. We are ready for the
applicant, please.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
March 3. 2005
Page '57 of 89
Seal: Good evening. Jonathan Seal, 1940 Bonito, Meridian, representing Winston
Moore. And we have read the staff report and with the exception of deleting Item No.
6, we are in agreement. Unless you have any questions, I'll sit down. Go home.
Zaremba: Thars way too easy. Can't we ask some questions?
Moe: I have no questions.
Newton-Huckabay: I have no questions.
Zaremba: Commissioner Borup, you look like a question is forming.
Borup: No. I'm clear now. It was the exception deleting number six, but you're in
agreement with deleting it?
Seal: Yes. I was going to actually request that. We have done everything within the
project already, so irs really not necessary. It's just a - basically creating addition lots.
Everything else is in place, so - okay. Thank you.
Zaremba: Thank you. We have no one signed up to speak on this issue. However,
this is your opportunity if there is somebody who came later. I see no one moving in the
direction of speaking. Commissioners? .
Moe: Mr. Chairman, I move that we close the Public Hearing on - let's see -" PP 05-
001.
Zaremba: PFP, actually.
More: Excuse me. PFP 05-001.
Zaremba: Thank you.
Rohm: Second.
Zaremba: We have a motion and a second to close the Public Hearing. All in favor say
aye. Any opposed? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Moe: Mr. Chairman?
Zaremba: Commissioner Moe.
Mae: I move that we forward to City Council recommending approval of PFP 05-001, to
include all staff comments of the hearing date of March 2nd - or, excuse me, March
3rd, 2005, with a transmittal date of January the 28th, 2005. End of motion. Excuse
Meridian Planning & Zoning
March 3, 2005
Page 58 of 89
me. I am not done. With the following change: Under - on page four, under the
preliminary and final plat site specific comments, item number six, can be deleted in its
entirety.
Rohm: Second.
Zaremba: We have a motion and a second. All in favor say aye. Any opposed? That
motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 14:
Item 15:
Item 16:
Recommendation: VAC 05-001 Request to Vacate East Manderly Lane
and a 30-foot wide agricultural easement, both being one and the same as
shown on the plat of Larkwood Subdivision, at the north boundary line of
Lot 13, Block 2 for Tustin Subdivision by SCS Investments, LLC -
northwest comer of East McMillan Road and North Locust Grove Road:
Public Hearing: AZ 05-002 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 45.88
acres from RUT to R-4 zones for proposed Tustin Subdivision by SCS
Investments, LLC - northwest comer of East McMillan Road and North
Locust Grove Road:
Public Hearing: PP 05-003 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 115
building lots and 26 common lots on 44.39 acres in a proposed R-4 zone
for proposed Tustin Subdivision by SCS Investments, LLC - northwest
corner of East McMillan Road and North Locust Grove Road:
Zaremba: All right. Again, we have multiple items that relate to each other. Items 14,
15,16. I'll open Public Hearing forVAC -- well, I'm sorry. Let me ask staff here. Since
this is just a recommendation, do we want to deal with 14 individually? It's not a Public
Hearing, according to the -
Canning: The discussion of the item won't make much sense without all the others.
Zaremba: Okay. Then, I will proceed as I was. We will open the recommendation for
VAC 05-001, Public Hearing for AZ 05-002, and the Public Hearing for PP 05-003.
These all relate to Tustin Subdivision. And we will begin with the staff report.
Canning: Chairman Zaremba, Members of the Commission, this is a preliminary plat
and an annexation and zoning and a vacation, as mentioned, for Tustin Subdivision. Irs
45.8 acres, currently zoned RUT, and they are requesting R-4. Saguaro Subdivision is
to the west. The name of this one just escaped me. It's not Dartmoor. Larkwood.
Thank You. Irs far too late. There is a church just north of the property. And, then, this
was the site of Leeshire Subdivision proposal that was before you earlier this year, but
subsequently denied. The proposed layout brings a road - two access roads into the
project. There is a lateral across -- or a slough across the project dividing it. There is