Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application Materials
TR ANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To ensure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission please submit your comments and recommendations to cityclerk@meridiancity.org To: Attention C.Jay Coles, City Clerk By: August 31, 2018 City Clerk ’s Office 33 E. Broadwa y Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-888-4433 Fax 208-888-4218 cityclerk@meridiancity.orgwww.meridiancit y.org Transmittal Date: July 17, 2018 File No: H-2018-0072 RZ, PP Hearing Date: September 6, 2018 REQUEST: A Rezone of 1.86 Acres of Land from the L-O Zoning District to the R-15 Zoning District and A Preliminary Plat Consisting of 19 Single-Family Residential Lots and 2 Common Lots on Approximately 1.86 Acres in a Proposed R-15 Zoning District for Razzberry Point Villas Subdivision. By: Ed Bowman Location of Property or Project: 1434 and 1492 E Star Drive Planning and Zoning Commission Meridian School District Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Meridian Post Office City Council Ada County Highway District Sanitary Services Ada County Development Services Building Department Central District Health Fire Department COMPASS Police Department Nampa Meridian Irrigation District City Attorney Settlers Irrigation District City Public Works Idaho Power Company City Planner Century Link Parks Department Intermountain Gas Co. Economic Development Idaho Transportation Department New York Irrigation District Ada County Associate Land Records Boise Project Board of Cont rol – Tim Paige Downtown Projects Community Development Meridian Development Corporation Valley Transit Historical Preservation Commission Idaho DEQ South of RR/SW Meridian NW Pipeline Boise-Kuna Irrigation District Hearing `Date; September 6, 2018 File No.: H-2018-0072 Project Name: Razzberry Point Villas Subdivision Request: (RZ): Request for a rezone of 1.86 acres of land from the L -O zoning district to the R-15 zoning district, by Ed Bowman. (PP): Request for a preliminary plat consisting of nineteen (19) single family residential lots and two (2) common lots on approximately 1.86 acres in a proposed R-15 zoning district. Location: The site is located at 1434 and 1492 E. Star Drive, in the NE 1/4 of Section 31, Township 4N., Range IE. (: > WE JUN 2 2 2018 Planning Division Iio� Nj�-- gY: ENT REVIEW APPLICATION STAFF USE ONLY: ^� S Project name: File number(s): " Assigned Planner: Related files: Type of Review Requested (check all that apply) ❑ Accessory Use (check only 1) ❑ Final Plat Modification ❑ Daycare ❑ Landscape Plan Modification ❑ Home Occupation Preliminary Plat ❑ Home Occupation/Instruction for 7 or more ❑ Private Street ❑ Administrative Design Review ❑ Property Boundary Adjustment ❑ Alternative Compliance XRezone ❑ Annexation and Zoning ❑ Short Plat ❑ Certificate of Zoning Compliance ❑ Time Extension (check only 1) ❑ City Council Review ❑ Director ❑ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ❑ Commission ❑ Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ❑ UDC Text Amendment ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Vacation (check only 1) ❑ Conditional Use Modification (check only 1) ❑ Director ❑ Director ❑ Commission ❑ Commission ❑ Variance ❑ Development Agreement Modification ❑ Other ❑ Final Plat Applicant Information Applicant name: Viz OyWM 4J Phone: Applicant address: 9OZ WV KNOX A/W -9— Email: City: 12— State: to Zip: Applicant's interest in property: ❑ Own ❑ Rent XOptioned ❑ Other Owner name: Owner address: City: Phone: Email: State: Zip: Agent/Contact name (e.g., architect, engineer, developer, representative): � Wye mor Firm name: J4G�� /r�2 �� Phone: 2�� -!S'14'27/ 00, - Agent address: t� ¢ T 5�� Email: /1Q-1e#A424>A)e A1— G7t ,CtZl� City: EA4W State: /r-> Zip: 036/ Primary contact is: ❑ Applicant ❑ Owner Agent/Contact Subject Property Information '` / Location/street address:/L/7 ly[ q2 6MIW o t �r Township, range, section: Assessor's parcel number(s): Total acreage: /•`7�3L Zoning district: L'0 (L 735-5-1/0 3,00 Community Development ■ Planning Division ■ 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Ste. 102 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 Fax: 208-888-6854 www.meridiancity.org/plannin -1 Reis: (2/2/20182/7/2018) Project/subdivision name: ZZ General description of proposed project/request: .�=0 n% m P d d' ropose zoning rs r c/ Acres of each zone proposed: �' T Type of use proposed (check all that apply): Residential ❑ Office ElCommercial ❑ Employment ❑ Industrial ❑ Other 64 Who will own & maintain the pressurized irrigation system in this development? _�—COM/jq�f f{,oV4A AW Which irrigation district does this property lie within? AD Primary irrigation source: `710P Secondary: 7%4> Square footage of landscaped areas to be irrigated (if primary or secondary point of connection is City water): JG&06 SZi� Fr Residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of residential units: M Number of building lots: - Number of common lots: Z• Number of other lots: Proposed number of dwelling units (for multi -family developments only): 1 bedroom: 2-3 bedrooms: 4 or more bedrooms: ., Maximum building height: 217 -0 Average property size (s.£): 7452 Gross density (Per UDC 11-1A-1): /3• ?� Net density (Per UDC 11-1A-1): ( Z)• Acreage of qualified open space: .07 Percentage of qualified open space: i6. S la Type and calculations of qualified open space provided in acres (Per UDC 11 -3G -3B): _ � - PAI Amenities provided with this development (if applicable):✓�—^�" GG �t�t-C.fl/Y — Type of dwelling(s) proposed: Single-family Detached Single-family Attached 9 ownhouse Minimum square footage of structure (excl. garage): _6C452_ Minimum property size (s.f): 2110 ❑ Duplex ❑ Multi -family ❑ Vertically Integrated ❑ Other Non-residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of building lots: Common lots: Other lots: Gross floor area proposed: Hours of operation (days and hours): Existing (if applicable): Building height: Total number of parking spaces provided: Number of compact spaces provided: A nth nri7n Linn Print applicant name: Applicant signature:. Date: Community Development ■ Planning Division ■ 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Ste. 102 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 Fax: 208-888-6854 www meridiancity orglplanning -2- Rev: (2/7/20!3) June 15, 2018 City of Meridian Planning Division 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 ollaborative St., Suite 120 - Eagle, ID 83616 208.514.2713 Re: Villas at Razzberry Point - Application for Re -Zone and Preliminary Plat Greetings Planning Staff, Thank you for the opportunity to provide our proposal for Re -Zone and Preliminary Plat. This application has been submitted in accordance with the City of Meridian's Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan. These applications are being submitted after having completed two pre -application meetings with Planning staff, conducted a neighborhood meeting and coordinated new public road proposal with Ada County Highway District. Re -Zone Proposal The subject site is located within the Mixed -Use Neighborhood and Medium Density Residential of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Designation and is currently zoned L -O (Light Office). The subject site is comprised of (3) existing properties known as 1492 and 1434 East Star Drive and the 30' wide adjacent common lot. The total size of these (3) lots is 1.431 acres and approximately 62,364 square feet. Currently the area is residential in nature with some nearby light commercial uses oriented toward Locust Grove Road and Residential Uses to the South, West and East. Our re -zone proposal to R-15, also requests a step up in density to 13.3 units/acre from 12.0 units/acre and will subdivide into (19) single-family residential home lots and (2) common lots. The common lots will include play structure, shade structure, bocce ball court, subdivision signage and common area landscaping. Our proposal is incorporating a common area pathway to encourage community living and neighborhood engagement. Additionally our proposal meets or exceeds all front and side setbacks, however we would like to request variance to allow a 5'-0" covered porch to encroach into the 12'-0" rear yard setback. Our proposed amenities include: common area landscaping throughout the development; a recreational area with shade structure, bocce ball (or similar) court and child play structure. Since this is a small site and we desire consistent and high quality site development all landscape will be common area maintenance. We feel this elevates this development for the future residents and existing surrounding neighborhoods. There will be limited fenced area in an effort to encourage community living, any installed fencing will be durable wrought iron and confined to a designated limited area in the rear yards. Existing perimeter property fencing is anticipated to remain. Preliminary Plat Included with the Re -Zone application is a preliminary plat for 19 buildable single-family lots and 2 common lots. The plat has been submitted in accordance with City of Meridian subdivision standards. Water will be provided by City of Meridian Water and Sewer will be provided by City of Meridian Sewer. Irrigation is proposed to be pressurized. Our coordination with ACHD has resulted in a 27'-0" wide street section 29'-0" Right of Way with a detached sidewalk. We would like to request a reduction in the sidewalk width from 5'-0" to 3'-0" given the design includes multiple options for pedestrian through and around the subject property. Additionally our proposal includes a section of common drive that serves Units 6,7,18,&19. The reason for the common area drive is to reduce driveway access points at the corners of the property and along existing Star Drive. We look forward to your approval of our Re -Zone and Preliminary Plat applications and we look forward to helping the City of Meridian revitalize an under-utilized property and filling the affordable housing gap. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this project please don't hesitate to contact? We thank you for your time and consideration. ALC Architecture richardw@alcarchitecture.com 208.514.2713 f WA S LAND SURVEYING PLLC Alpha Omega Engineering Date: 6/13/18 Job No.: 5118 EXHIBIT "A" REZONE PARCEL DESCRIPTION The following Describes a Parcel of Land being Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 6 of Razzberry Crossing Subdivision as Filed for Record in Book 93 of Plat at Pages 11215 thru 11217, Records of Ada County, Idaho, the West 27.00 feet of North Bright Angle Avenue Road Right of Way, and the North Half of the East Star Drive Road Right of Way Lying in a portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a found Aluminum Cap Marking the Northeast Corner of the NE 1/4 of said Section 31; From which, the East 1/4 Corner of said Section 31 bears, South 00°3352" West, 2,659.63 feet which is being Monumented with a found Aluminum Cap; Thence along Easterly Boundary Line of the NE 1/4 of said Section 31, South 00°33'52" West, 1329.69 feet to a point being on the Prolongation of the Northerly Boundary Line of said Razzberry Crossing Subdivision; Thence leaving said Easterly Boundary Line, and along the Northerly Boundary Line of said Razzberry Crossing Subdivision, and it's Prolongation, North 89°46'30" West, 254.78 feet to a found 5/8" Iron Pin Marking the Centerline Intersection of North Bright Angle Avenue, the POINT OF BEGINNING: Thence leaving said Northerly Boundary Line, and its Prolongation, and along the Centerline of North Bright Angle Avenue, South 00°33'41" West, 259.75 feet to a found 5/8" Iron Pin; Thence continuing Southwesterly 39.32 feet along the arc of a curve to the right having a Radius of 100.00 feet, a Central Angle of 22°31'49" and a Long Chord which bears, South 11 049'36" West, 39.07 feet to a found 5/8" Iron Pin; Thence continuing, South 23005'03" West, 26.26 feet to a found 5/8" Iron Pin at the Centerline Intersection of East Star Drive; Thence leaving said Centerline, and along the Centerline of East Star Drive, Northwesterly 68.08 feet along the arc of a curve to the right having a Radius of 150.00 feet, a Central Angle of 26°00'21" and a Long Chord which Bears, North 53°54'36" West, 67.50 feet to a found 5/8" Iron Pin Marking a point of Reverse Curvature; Thence continuing Northwesterly 255.88 feet along the arc of a curve to the left having a Radius of 300.00 feet, a Central Angle of 48°52'07" and a Long Chord which Bears, North 65020'26" West, 248.19 feet to a found 5/8" Iron Pin; Thence continuing, North 89046'30" West, 60.00 feet to a point being on the Prolongation of the Westerly Boundary Line of Lot 3, Block 6 of said Razzberry Crossing Subdivision; Thence leaving said Centerline, and along the Westerly Boundary Line of said Lot 3, and its Prolongation, North 00°13'30" East, 180.00 feet to the Northwest Corner of said Lot 3; Thence leaving said Westerly Boundary Line, and along the Northerly Boundary Lines of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 6 of said Razzberry Crossing Subdivision, and their Prolongation, South 89°46'30" East, 360.24 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: The above Described Parcel of Land contains 1.86 Acres (80,905 Sq. Ft.), more or less. /l4 k 623 11th Ave. South, Nampa, ID 83651 - T. (208) 442-0115 - C. (208) 608-2510.1koemer.cls@gmai1.cov Ilm n- EXHIBIT IIB" LOCATED IN THE NE1/4 OF SECTION 31, T. 4 N., R. 1 E., B.M., CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2018 E. McMILLAN RD 30 29 _LINE TABLE LINE _ BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 23005'03"W 26.26 L2 N 89'46'30"W 60.00 ® ® S 89046'30" E 360.24' I BLOCK 6 RAZZBERRY CROSSING SUBDIVISION BOOK 93, PAGES 11215-11217 'C l co LU CDf �tfj/ _.._.._.._..�.. _. c .•\ RSR/�� //// Nt LAND , 825 1y��9TF 0 F COMPASS LAND SURVEYING, PLLC i23 11th Avenue South Nampa, ID 83651 Office: (208) 442-0115 Fax: (208) 327-2106 JN 5118 31'-"32 r) Al w I0 _ U I- rn� M � O Scale: 1" = 60' z POINT OF 1 BEGINNING N 89°46'30" W I 254.78' 27.00' u..i LO Nz co CZ fn Z cmo � O 2 N (�m U- C -4 O M Cl) O Ca M �I Cz EAST 1/4 31@32 CORNER t CURVE TABLE CURVEE255.88 C RADIUS DELTA CHORD BRG CHORD C1 2 100.00 22°31'49" S 11 °49'36" W 39.07 C2 8 150.00 26"0'21" N 53°5436" W 67.50 C3 300.00 48°52'7" N 65'20'26"W 248.19 ® ® S 89046'30" E 360.24' I BLOCK 6 RAZZBERRY CROSSING SUBDIVISION BOOK 93, PAGES 11215-11217 'C l co LU CDf �tfj/ _.._.._.._..�.. _. c .•\ RSR/�� //// Nt LAND , 825 1y��9TF 0 F COMPASS LAND SURVEYING, PLLC i23 11th Avenue South Nampa, ID 83651 Office: (208) 442-0115 Fax: (208) 327-2106 JN 5118 31'-"32 r) Al w I0 _ U I- rn� M � O Scale: 1" = 60' z POINT OF 1 BEGINNING N 89°46'30" W I 254.78' 27.00' u..i LO Nz co CZ fn Z cmo � O 2 N (�m U- C -4 O M Cl) O Ca M �I Cz EAST 1/4 31@32 CORNER t s89°46'30"e 5118 -STAR DRIVE REZONE DESCRIPTION Scale: 1 inch= 47 feet File:g "ract 1: 1.8573 Acres (80905 Sq. Feet), Closure: n58.4107e 0.01 ft. (1/171792), Perimeter=1250 ft.9 11 s00.3341w 259.75 08 s89.4630e 360.24 12 Rt, r=100.00, delta=022.3149, chard=s11.4936w 39.07 0 s23.0503w 26.26 14 Rt, r=150.00, delta=026.0021, chord=n53.5436w 67.50 ,5 Lt, r=300.00, delta=048.5207, chord=n65.2026w 248.19 6 n89.4630w 60 7 n00.1330e 180 Perimeter description for Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 6 Razzberry Crossing Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block 6 of Razzberry Crossing Subdivision, according to the plat filed in Book 93 of Plats at Page 11213, records of Ada County, Idaho, the perimeter of which is described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; thence along the East line of said Section South 00° 33' 41" West a distance of 1,329.42 feet to a point; thence North 89° 46' 30" West a distance of 281.71 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 1 of Block 6, the Real Point of Beginning; thence South 00° 33' 41" West a distance of 241.39 feet to a point of curve; thence 47.54 feet along a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 20.00 feet, a central angle of 136° 11' 32" and a long chord which bears South 68° 39' 27" West a distance of 37.11 feet to a point of tangency; thence 105.69 feet along a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 327.00 feet, a central angle of 18°31' 07" and a long chord which bears North 52° 30' 21" West a distance of 105.23 feet to a point of tangency; thence 31.20 feet along a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 325.92 feet, a central angle of 5°29' 08" and a long chord which bears North 66° 19' 48" West a distance of 31.19 feet to the Southeast corner of aforesaid Lot 1, thence 31.37 feet along a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 325.92 feet, a central angle of 5°30' 50" and a long chord which bears North 71° 49' 47" West a distance of 31.35 feet to a point of tangency; thence 96.53 feet along a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 325.00 feet, a central angle of 17° 01' 07" and a long chord which bears North 81° 15' 57" West a distance of 96.18 feet to a point of tangency; thence North 89° 46' 30" West a distance of 30.00 feet to the Southwest corner of aforesaid Lot 2; thence continuing North 89° 46' 30" West a distance of 30.00 feet to the Southwest corner of aforesaid Lot 3; thence North 00° 13' 30" East a distance of 155.00 feet to the Northwest corner of said lot 3; thence South 89° 46' 30" East a distance of 30.00 feet to the Northwest corner of aforesaid Lot 2; thence South 89° 46' 30" East a distance of 156.00 feet to the Northwest corner of aforesaid Lot 1; thence South 89° 46' 30" East a distance of 147.24 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. Title: I Date: 05-01-2018 Scale: 1 inch = 50 feet I File: RAZZBERRY BOWMAN.des j Tract 1: 1.433 Acres: 62428 Sq Feet: Closure= s34.0651w 0.01 Feet: Precision =1/166689: Perimeter= 1102 Feet Tract 2: 0.750 Acres: 32659 Sq Feet: Closure= s02.2720e 0.00 Feet: Precision =1/318801: Perimeter= 752 Feet Tract 3: 0.577 Acres: 25119 Sq Feet: Closure= n01.4907w 0.01 Feet: Precision =1/124687: Perimeter = 648 Feet Tract 4: 0.107 Acres: 4650 Sq Feet: Closure= n00.0000e 0.00 Feet: Precision >1/999999: Perimeter= 370 Feet Tract 5: 0.068 Acres: 2945 Sq Feet: Closure= n00.0000e 0.00 Feet: Precision >1/999999: Perimeter= 334 Feet 001=S00.3341W 241.39 002: Rt, R=20.00, Arc=47.54, Delta=136.1132 Bng�68.3927W, Chd=37.11 003: Lt, R=327.00, Arc= 105,69, Delta= 18.3107 M Chd=t0523 ,Arc=31.20, Delta=05.2908 Chd=31.19 , Arc=31.37, Delta -05.3050 Bng=N71.4947W, Chd=31.35 006: Lt, R=325.00, Arc=96.53, Delta=17.0107 Bng=N81.1557W, Chd=96.18 007=N89.4630W 30.00 008=N89.4630W 30.00 009=N00.1330E 155.00 010=S89.4630E 30.00 011=S89.4630E 156.00 012=S89.4630E 147.24 013=@001 014=S00.3341W 241.39 015: Rt, R=20.00, Arc=47.54, Delta=136.1132 Bng=S68.3927W,Chd=37.11 016: Lt, R=327.00, Arc= 105.69, Delta= 18.3107 Bng=N52.3021 W, Chd=105.23 017: Lt, R=325.92, Arc=31.20, Delta --05.2908 Bng=N66.1948W, Chd=31.19 018=N00.3341E 178.90 019=589.4630E 147.24 020=@001 021=/N89.4630W 147.24 022=S00.3341 W 178.90 023: Lt, R=325.92, Arc=31.37, Delta=05.3050 Bng=N7 L4947W, Chd=31.35 024: Lt, R=325.00, Arc=96.53, Delta=17.0107 Bng=N81.1557W, Chd=96.18 025=N89.4630W 30.00 026=N00.1330E 155.00 027=589.4630E 156.00 028=@001 029=/N89.4630W 303.24 030=S00.1330W 155.00 031=N89.4630W 30.00 032=N00.1330E 155.00 033=589.4630E 30.00 034=@001 035=/N89.4630W 147.24 036=/500.3341 W 178.90 037=N00.3341E 20.00 038=S89.4630E 147.24 039=S00.3341 W 20.00 040=N89.4630W 147.24 ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. DAVID NAVARftO AMOUNT 3.00 1 BOISE 1E11TDAHO "'I'06 10:51 AM III IIIIAI�U��ipl�l�l��l��l�li�l�ll � OEPUTY Gail Garrett RECORDED -REQUEST OF 106101939 ' O Pioneer y� r a t}• V V V 0 G 0 1 N G B E Y 0 N 0 5680 East Franklin Road, Suite 150 / Nampa, Idaho 83687 / (208) 465-6655 WARRANTY DEED For Value Received The Cutting Edge, L.C., a limited liability company hereinafter referred to as Grantor, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, warrant and convey unto Douglas E. Victor, a married man, Jason D. Ames, a married man, and Randall 0. Donald, a married man hereinafter referred to as Grantee, whose current address is 935 E. Winding _Creek # 100, Eaci , Idaho 83616 the following described premises, to -wit: Lot 1, Block 6, Razzberry Crossing Subdivision, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 93 of plats, Pages 11213 thru 11217, records of Ada County, Idaho. To HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee, his heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee, that Grantor is the owner in fee simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all encumbrances except current years taxes, levies, and assessments, and except U.S. Patent reservations, restrictions, easements of record, and easements visible upon the premises, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the same from all claims whatsoever. Dated: March l6, 2006 The Cutt' ge B: Carl Reiterman, Manager State of IDAHO ss. County of CANYON i If r onn 1 erterman, Manager On this 161h day of March, 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, in and for said State, personally appeared Carl Reiterman & Bonnie Reiterman, known to me, and/or identified to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the Managers of the Limited Liability Company that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that such Limited Liability Company executed the same. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL (SEAL) NryPublic ti••'OTARY•. Residing at: Caldwell - �•" Commission Expires: Pulik" •JO Page 1 of 1 02/12/2018 9:17 AM ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. DAVID NAVARRO AMOUNT 3.00 1 BOISE IDAHO 06/26/06 10:51 AM DEPUTY Gail Garrett P■ RECORDED—REQUEST OF 10610194© Pioneer � 0 b a W W ■■■■ v w w■ GOING BE YON O 5680 East Franklin Road, Suite 150 / Nampa, Idaho 83687 / (208) 465-6655 WARRANTY DEED For Value Received The Cutting Edge, L.C., a limited liability company hereinafter referred to as Grantor, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, warrant and convey unto Jason Douglas E. Victor, a married man,Pand .),p. Ames, a married man and Randall C. Donald, a married man hereinafter referred to as Grantee, whose current address Is 935 F winding Creek # 1 the following described premises, to -wit: Lot 2, Block 6, Razzberry Crossing Subdivision, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 93 of plats, Pages 11213 thru 11217, records of Ada County, Idaho. To HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee, his heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee, that Grantor is the owner in fee simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all encumbrances except current years taxes, levies, and assessments, and except U.S. Patent reservations, restrictions, easements of record, and easements visible upon the premises, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the same from all claims whatsoever. Dated: March 16, 2006 The C i g dg P e' B: Carl Reiterman, Manager Bonnie Reiterman, Mana r State of IDAHO ss. County of CANYON On this 16th day of March, 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, in and for said State, personally appeared Carl Reiterman & Bonnie Reiterman, known to me, and/or identified to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the Managers of the Limited Liability Company that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that such Limited Liability Company executed the same. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL (SEAL) RE;E,s`. Nota Public % 6V AR), ' Residing at: Caldwell - •" _ Commission Expires: p D P VBG Page 1 of 1 02/12/2018 9:18 AM ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich 2018.028386 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=3 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 03/30/2018 12:22 PM eFidelity National Tt1Q FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE - BOISE $15.00 Escrow No.: 34601807218 -SS WARRANTY DEED FOR VALUE RECEIVED Razzberry Crossing Subdivision Homeowners' Association, Inc. GRANTOR(S), does(do) hereby GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL AND CONVEY unto: Randy Donald, a married man � � �� Q GRANTEE(S), whose current address is: the following described real property in Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows, to wit: SEE EXHIBIT °A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor(s) does(do) hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee(s), that Grantor(s) is/are the owner(s) in fee simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all encumbrances EXCEPT those to which this conveyance is expressly made subject and those made, suffered or done by the Grantee(s); and subject to reservations, restrictions, dedications, easements, rights of way and agreements, (if any) of record, and general taxes and assessments, (including irrigation and utility assessments, if any) for the current year, which are not yet due and payable, and that Grantor(s) will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this document on the date(s) set forth below. Effective this 3p day of March, 2018. Razzberry Crossing Subdivision Homeownero' Association, Inc. BY: errick Eisenbeis HOA President Deed (Warranty) Printed: 0327.18 Q 10:04 AM by SS IDD1052.doc / Updated: 05.25.16 Page 1 ID-FT-FXEA-03460.211389,34601807218 WARRANTY DEED (continued) STATE OF Idaho, COUNTY OF Ada, -ss. On this 3) day of UA , 2018, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared De 'c Eisenbeis, known or identified to me to be the HOA President of the corporation that executed the instrument or the persons who executed on behalf of Razzberry Crossing Subdivision Homeowners' Association, Inc., an Idaho Corporation and acknowledged to me that helshe executed the same as such HOA President. Signature: ��..�...�...,,� Name: �,.�`'F'�SON ''•. Residing at: ��.y'�4`?;.• "'••.� •�'•,- My Commission Expires: phenson��� ���'� (SEAL) Residing in: Boise, Idaho Commission expires: 01/15/2020 Deed (Warranty) IDD1052.doo / Updated: 05.26.16 Page 2 � ' 4�� V • In '�. � •�. mak., S1 - Printed: 03.27.18 @ 10:04 AM by SS ID -FT FXEA-03460.211389-34601807218 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description For APN/Parcel ID(s): R7355910400 Lot 3 in Block 6 of Razzberry Crossing Subdivision, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 93 of Plats at Page(s) 11213-11217, records of Ada County, Idaho. Deed (Warranty) Printed: 03.27.18 Q 10:04 AM by SS IDD1052.doc / Updated: 05.25.16 Page 3 ID-FT-FXEA-03460.211389-34601807218 (1) Disk with electronic version of the conceptual engineering plans in the format specified above. .—L I AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO COUNTY OF ADA I, �TS�� �: qm�s , ��� rr��✓%�� 1/41, �j (name) �_� (address) (city) (state) being fust duly sworn upon, oath, depose and say: 1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to: �E%i 1� d� AN R%��d/0 %L 4fSlL" o /0�4 f�h ��i ��4 (name) (address) to submit the accompanying application(s) pertaining to that property. 2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and its employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. 3. I hereby grant permission to City of Meridian staff to enter the subject property for the purpose of site inspections related to processing said application(s). Dated this J day SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and JENNIFER PARI( COX Notary Public State of Idaho z writ Public for Idaho) Residing at: I % U I " " 1'+,V— I— — My Commission Expires: — t Gj— �7-0 Community Development ® Planning Division ® 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Ste. 102 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 Fax: 208-888-6854 www.meridiancity.org/plannhin; (1) Disk with electronic version of the conceptual engineering plans in the format specified above. AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO ) COUNTY OF ADA ) 1, �} NUJ / -�L114 i -a /-I 92 /:" 5h- D'-. y}� (name) a ddress) (city) (state) being first duly sworn upon, oath, depose and say: 1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to: CiC/LtJd/-�d1rJl7c��J !lam �/rSs�yil lr (name) (address) to submit the accompanying application(s) pertaining to that property. 2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and its employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. 3. 1 hereby grant permission to City of Meridian staff to enter the subject property for the purpose of site inspections related to processing said application(s). Dated this day of Aril , 2019 (Sig tune) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before the the day and year first above written. t?RY PLI NOTARY PUBUB C ( oar ubl is for �Idafio) Ale Vit d 4 STATE OF NEVADA .,,HryA My Commission Expires: 10/25/2020 Residing at: 4�) d k/ 'All % 69 03 J Certificate No: 99.58339.1 My Commission Expires: 0 0--v Community Development ■ Planning Division ■ 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Ste. 102 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 Fax: 208-888-6854 www.meridiancityorr;/planning ,qOl M L A V1 `OG N N O N O n w a N d m v O c ni � Vl V � in (n CD in 0 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE-APPLICAmN MEETING NOTES Project/Subdivision Name: Applicant(s)/Contact(s): — City Staff: &xx is,,kl , Location: Date: -11- 101� Size of Property: , 1 • 113 Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: /tD R AQLC, .-. Design Guidelines Development Context: ❑ Ur an Urban/Suburban ❑ Suburban ❑ Rural Existing Use: Ntw(-� Existing Zoning: L -U Proposed Use: r.F(t Proposed Zoning: QfIX Surrounding Uses: Street Buffer(s) and/or Land Use Buffer(s): Open Space/Amenities/Pathways: Access/Stub Streets/Street System: Sewer & Water Service: Waterways/ FloodplainlTopography/Hazards: History: 22�, ��1 iAz Additional Meeting Notes: Note, A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) will be required by ACHD for large commercial projects and any residential development with over 100 units. To avoid unnecessary delays & expedite the hearing process, applicants are encouraged to submit the TIS to ACHD prior to submitting their application to the City. Not having ACHD comments and/or conditions on large projects may delay hearings) at the City. Please contact Mindy Wallace at 387- 6178 876178 or Christy Little at 387-6144 at ACHD for information in regard to a TIS, conditions, impact fees and process. Other Agencies/Departments to Contact: ❑ Ada County Highway Dist. (ACHD) ❑ Idaho Transportation Dept. (ITD) ❑ Republic Services ❑ Central District Health Department Application(s) Required: ❑ Administrative Design Review ❑ Alternative Compliance ❑ Annexation ❑ City Council Review ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment -Map E]Comprehensive Plan Amendment --Text ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Nampa Meridian Irrigation Dist. (NMID) ❑ ❑ Settler's Irrigation District ❑ ❑ Police Department ❑ ❑ Fire Department ❑ Conditional Use Permit Modification/Transfer (� Development Agreement Modification ❑] ❑ Final Plat ❑ ❑ Final Plat Modification ❑ ❑ Planned Unit Development ❑ Preliminary Plat ❑ ❑ Private Street ❑ Public Works Department Building Department Parks Department Other: Rezone Short Plat Time Extension - Council UDC Text Amendment Vacation Variance Other Notes; l) Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting in accord with UDC 11 -5A -5C prior to submittal of an application requiring a public hearing (except for a vacation or short plat); and 2) All applicants for permits requiring a public hearing shall post the site with a public hearing notice in accord with UDC 11 -5A -5D.3 (except for UDC text amendments, Comp Plan text amendments, and vacations). The information provided during this meeting is based on current UDC requirements and the Comprehensive Plan. Any subsequent changes to the URC and/or Comp Plan may affect your submittal and/or application. This pre -application meeting shall be valid for four (4) months. C E I I Community Development Department Development Services Division Meridian City Hall, Suite 102 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 (208)887-2211 PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTES Date: q —1 o ry 1 Project/Subdivision Name: �'��� Y� � �' i U el-- � � � � t � � 5) Applicant(s)/Contact(s): Development Services Staff.' jj Sanitary Sewer Service: = ' 1 S� ) Y) -S T� !3 _S Y" e M 0 V a b A v t Jv "►1 &Q YVt ,A 7,1 t » 11 e Li Mapping Provided.')(i Y ❑ N Domestic Water Service' ' ZS yt cy � '� see cyO v L y1a, 7'y c SC_LUL�.Ir~a �� �- r,�>dL 'fie Tlte. _!�a �t Mapping Provided: ❑ Y ❑ N Reuse Water Service: A Mapping Provided: ❑ Y ❑ N Waterways/ Floodplain/Topography/Hazards: Mapping Provided: ❑ Y ❑ N Gravity/Pressurized Irrigation: District Street Lighting: C o Y1 ac l � Cj h Y` t S� � � S � ` � � � f� � 'For Ye_e o S` r e e t c t �� 5Te Y' l> r` )'t t w' . Reqs. Provided: ❑ Y ❑ N The City of Meridian's Improvement Standards for Street Lighting can be fou d online at: htp://www.meridiancity.org/public works.aspx?id=272 r Additional Meeting Notes: L-0-'1A t' d Oe -0- e__ r_� 5J ' ,-t S C' w e—V- _M I A Sn t 1 1 Vi P P r,11) fA lV d, Vl J/) '),^ J6—X i 5fY C:\Users\dcline\Desktop\Pre-Application Meeting Notes.docx Rev. 10062015 Ilaborative Suite 120 • Eagle, ID 83616 ?08.614.2713 Neighborhood meeting sign in sheet: RE: Star Drive Subdivision — Meridian, Idaho Date: April 24, 2018 6:00 P.M. Address: Z27 /5'/-z- 'F• le �CA- 3 • �''� el ni � 22 rrou Ltu �+ti 5 �� l �°(S ,%hs�h /Ydd E��IElevevr JCn� l2,,rh / �J� lS.3g � Ctz�c�/��" o� e rex. G,fo��/cc�arFL �?.� � nl'. Ave Cst.r�� �•.tdsn�/� M �R Name: ollaborative St., State 120 - Eagle, ID 83616 208.514.2713 Neighborhood meeting sign in sheet: RE: Star Drive Subdivision — Meridian, Idaho Date: April 24, 2018 6:00 P.M. Name: Address: From: Ryan Beecroft <rbeecroft@noeridiancby.or8> Sent: Monday, June 18,2O183:32PK4 To: Richard Wilmot Subject: RE: Address verification for 6-18-18 Address Verification: Villas at Starpoint Address., 1434 E STAR DR, MERIDIAN, ID 83646 save- Reset Cancel Help Parcel Detail I District Parcel #^ Primary R7355910300 Lot Block Subdivision k_ _16__] RAZZBERRY CROSSING SUB Ryan Beecroft |Addressing Technician City nfMeridian |Community Development Department 33E.Broadway Ave,Meridian, Idaho 8364J Phone: 208'887-221lext. 1314 Email: rbeecroft@meridiancitV.org From: Richard Wilmot Sent: Monday, June 18i 2018 12:05 PM To: Ryan Beecroft Subject: RE: Address verification for Shoot 'yeS, it is 1492/ my mistake, COU it Villas at Starpoint. Thank you. ARCHITECT, NCARB-90773 1119 State. Ste. 120 Eagle, Idaho 83616 p. 208.514.2713 Ext. 8205 c. 208.596.1565 e. richardw0alcarchitecture.com From: Ryan Beecroft [mai Ito: rbeecroft@meridiancity.org] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 12:03 PM To: Richard Wilmot Subject: RE: Address verification for There is no 1429 East Star Drive, did you mean 1492? Would you like me to just use "Star Drive Subdivision" as the project name for both addresses? Ryan Beecroft ( Addressing Technician City of Meridian Community Development Department 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-887-2211 ext. 1314 Email: rbeecroft@meridiancity.org From: Richard Wilmot [ma iIto: RichardW(aaIca rchitecture. ccm] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 11:51 AM To: Ryan Beecroft Subject: RE: Address verification for All t 1119 State. Ste. 120 Eagle, Idaho 83616 p. 208.514.2713 Ext. 8205 c. 208.596.1565 e. richardw@aIcarchitecture.com From: Ryan Beecroft [mailto:rbeecroft meridiancity.org] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 11:51 AM To: Richard Wilmot Cc: Terri Ricks Subject: RE: Address verification for Richard, Do you have site plans or project names for either of these addresses? Ryan Beecroft Addressing Technician City of Meridian Community Development Department 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-887-2211 ext. 1314 Email: rbeecroft@meridiancity.org From: Richard Wilmot [mailto:RichardW alcarchitecture.com] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 10:50 AM To: Community Development Subject: Address verification for 1429 and 1434 East Star Drive, Meridian, Idaho 83646. ----------------- �'�tac r„ 1119 State. Ste. 120 Eagle, Idaho 83616 p. 208.514.2713 Ext. 8205 c. 208.596.1565 e. richardw alcarchitecture.com City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-888-4433 www.meridiancit .org All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. From: Ryan Beecroft <dbeecroft@noeridianchy.or0> Sent: Monday, June 18,2Ul8380PM To; Richard Wilmot Subject: RE: Address verification for 6-18'18 Address Verification: Villas at Starpoint Address: 1492 E STAR DR MERIDIAN, ID 83646 save Reset Cancel Help Parcel Detail District Pu�e|# ^ pun��/umPmuo ~ rimary R7355810380 Lot Block Subdivision [1 16 RAZZBERRY CROSSING SUB Ryan Beecroft Addressing Technician City ofMeridian |Community Development Department 33E.Broadway Ave,Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208'8D7-3211ext. 13l4 Email: rbeecroft@meri.diancity.org From: Richard Wilmot [ mai Ito: Richa.rdW(d)a Ica rchitectu re. co m] Sent: Monday, June 18,201812:U5PM To: Ryan Beecroft Subject: RE: Address verification for Shoot ... yes, it is 1492, my mistake. Call it Villas at Starpoint. Thank you. Ift'l[OU'l-il N PILTA IN a Is v ARCHITECT, NCARB-90773 1119 State. Ste. 120 Eagle, Idaho 83616 p. 208.514.2713 Ext. 8205 c. 208.596.1565 e, richardwCa)aIca rchitecture.com From: Ryan Beecroft [ ma i Ito: rbeecroft(a)meridiancity.org] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 12:03 PM To: Richard Wilmot Subject: RE: Address verification for There is no 1429 East Star Drive, did you mean 1492? Would you like me to just use "Star Drive Subdivision" as the project name for both addresses? Ryan Beecroft Addressing Technician City of Meridian Community Development Department 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-887-2211 ext. 1314 Email: rbeecroft@meridiancity.org From: Richard Wilmot [mailto:RichardW alcarchitecture.com] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 11:51 AM To: Ryan Beecroft Subject: RE: Address verification for 1119 State. Ste. 120 Eagle, Idaho 83616 p. 208.514.2713 Ext. 8205 c. 208.596.1565 e. richardw0)alcarchitecture.com From: Ryan Beecroft [mailto:rbeecroftmeridiancity.org] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 11:51 AM To: Richard Wilmot Cc: Terri Ricks Subject: RE: Address verification for Richard, Do you have site plans or project names for either of these addresses? Ryan Beecroft ( Addressing Technician City of Meridian Community Development Department 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-887-2211 ext. 1314 Email: rbeecroft@meridiancity•org II�IAt: t =.f From: Richard Wilmot [mailto:RichardW a Ica rchitectu re. com] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 10:50 AM To: Community Development Subject: Address verification for 1429 and 1434 East Star Drive, Meridian, Idaho 83646. Z- c��; i 1119 State, Ste. 120 Eagle, Idaho 83616 p. 208.514.2713 Ext. 8205 c. 208.596.1565 e. richardw(&aIca rchitecture.com City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-888-4433 www.meridiancity org All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. From: Brooke Rhodes <brooke@aoengineering.com> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 10:06 AM To: Richard Wilmot Cc: Liimakka Mike Subject: FW: Razzberry Point Villas Subdivision Name Reservation For your records. Brooke Rhodes 818 S. La Cassia Drive, Suite 102, Boise, Idaho 83705 P.O. Box 1391, Meridian, Idaho 83680 Office: (208) 322-5250 Cell: (928) 606-2275 From: Sub Name Mail <subnamemail@adaweb.net> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 9:17 AM To:'Ikoerner.cls@gmail.com' <Ikoerner.cls@gmail.com>; Brooke Rhodes <brooke@aoengineering.com> Subject: Razzberry Point Villas Subdivision Name Reservation June 22, 2018 Larry Koerner, Compass Land Surveying Brooke Rhodes, Alpha Omega Engineering RE: Subdivision Name Reservation: RAZZBERRY POINT VILLAS SUBDIVISION At your request, I will reserve the Razzberry Point Villas Subdivision for your project. I can honor this reservation only as long as your project is in the approval process. Final approval can only take place when the final plat is recorded. This reservation is available for the project as long as it is in the approval process unless the project is terminated by the client, the jurisdiction or the conditions of approval have not been met, in which case the name can be re -used by someone else. Sincerely, Jerry L. Hastings, PLS 5359 County Surveyor Deputy Clerk Recorder Ada County Development Services 200 W. Front St., Boise, ID 83702 (208) 287-7912 office (208) 287-7909 fox From: Brooke Rhodes [mailto:brooke@aoengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 12:44 PM To: Sub Name Mail Subject: RE: Subdivision Name Reservation Glen, We will take Razzberry Point Villas. Thank you! Brooke Rhodes 818 S. La Cassia Drive, Suite 102, Boise, Idaho 83705 P.O. Box 1391, Meridian, Idaho 83680 Office: (208) 322-5250 Cell: (928) 606-2275 From: Sub Name Mail <subnamemail@adaweb.net> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 11:59 AM To: Brooke Rhodes <brooke@aoengineering.com> Subject: RE: Subdivision Name Reservation Brooke; Villas cannot be used as the primary name. It could be Razzberry Point Villas, but not Villas at Razzberry Point. Glen From: Brooke Rhodes[mailto:brooke(&aoenaineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 8:56 AM To: Sub Name Mail Cc: Liimakka Mike ; 'Richard Wilmot' Subject: RE: Subdivision Name Reservation Glen, Could we use "Villas at Razzberry Point"? Thanks, Brooke Rhodes 818 S. La Cassia Drive, Suite 102, Boise, Idaho 83705 P.O. Box 1391, Meridian, Idaho 83680 Office: (208) 322-5250 Cell: (928) 606-2275 From: Sub Name Mail <subnamemail@adaweb.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 4:26 PM To: Brooke Rhodes <brooke@aoengineering.com> Subject: RE: Subdivision Name Reservation Brooke; The primary name Star would not be available. However, since the plat would be a re -subdivision of Razzberry Crossing, we could allow and you may wish to consider Razzberry Crossing Sub No 2, or possibly Razzberry Point Sub. Otherwise, please select another name. �A Glen Smallwood Surveying Technician Ada County Development Services 200 W. Front St., Boise, ID 83702 (208) 287-7926 office (208) 287-7909 fox From: Brooke Rhodes[mai Ito: brooke(a)aoengineering. com] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 10:04 AM To: Sub Name Mail Cc: Liimakka Mike Subject: Subdivision Name Reservation Good morning, I am working on the preliminary plat for a subdivision located in the NE % of Section 31, T.4N., R.1E., B.M. in Meridian, including lots 1, 2, and 3 of block 6 of the "Razzberry Crossing Subdivision". The parcel numbers are: R7355910400, R7355910390, R7355910380. The surveyor in charge of the plat is Larry Koerner with Compass Land Surveying, phone number 208- 442-0115 The owner is Ed Bowman with Patra Properties, phone number 208-921-8585 We would like to request either of the following names: "Star Point" or "Villas at Star Point". Please let me know if either are acceptable and if either is preferred. Brooke Rhodes 818 S. La Cassia Drive, Suite 102, Boise, Idaho 83705 P.O. Box 1391, Meridian, Idaho 83680 Office: (208) 322-5250 Cell: 928 606-2275 i ® -e. <$ o m 0 — ° o. tim JL S Ill ;v O \l 1-7 N dNW P l .r0 OONEY .II FALLS wAY wW 0 i 2+07.86 -CON -- SSM 505 �q• � � 8 I P 1 � o U o W ON 3 3Nn Y EITEHY AN R RAVENUE +ssv . to caNs 2 > UR 1 s 14 TON •��.'7J \��I C ss I CoB 5+ .00 NS . oqRA �Irj - 1 $ q?; 82 82�sgg Eggs 2 + to+ .—L, _ �'as spy ��s� ? !� ZIN o ss. 109 •, fl. _G>. g 3 3 C PmJj ca fn •T• to+ 5.36- ^^\ } SS. 150 n^�gmt2y�� 11+ &14- T. r gr,� °9aG��3pp-a_4i ^P TAF^ W SsMi 551 2k zfA Q am. NN q m 194 X 9 8 I m pp pp 12+ 5.65= $_ �: 2= 2� •a ' 552_ a mco 11 -- — — --- $_—— _5 a O g 4 n _B� AN CTA o Y9� 3 TAGE" IN 4B ll N. 9RIGNT ,'>e ANGEL AVE. OVEN ROAD 6,1 Ax TAGE" IN 4B ll N. 9RIGNT ,'>e ANGEL AVE. OVEN ROAD r zlo=I "l O=€g H 3 � n g > e q�Ryq � � m : U) k AIM H l3EJNd iH9R19 H I � } 41 1 uj- f -b— - — - T - --- --- , - --- ---- N - ------ -- -- -- 1-- 7- -- - ----- i i l i i I -,"k= 6 O / I b ZV .ref I LD i U I I i i c�gRtltl' I esas' t o I I p �' / Y n'W 'iii I I r________� e4e$ � c�e� ri _____, ' Q I �s l a I x'�« ' rn ci i uj b w � � i I -�---- --- IF Ji '-- -- — ----— f - I 1 I 1 i=MTMTFFIZi I r e3 —------ -- __ ----- -- dd_ I I I I 1 1 1 I I I rl I g� R CRI", <s �aryh j o s CR, �H 7= j a� -- -- _ x � � r• Y� , a x a s p s I x a„ <. I x a x n< 0 w B I w6aeoe@ayiw 50[CB ayapi'oc,og g � o` m Ll OHVG1'Nt/IQRJ3W o 'o NOISIAKie 1S 1NIOd dVIS 0. e� Lf3.135tl311.5 d10tl � U r � o a� 3'el'M'OL o � z @� 3 ✓� } w o 0 Z ? Jill U Z O_ m >UQ o_ 0 0 ~ W ; g W z se n - o w0 F -j r3 O < w cr LLp F-;� w gx = 0 m w F- > P- <°7 "�y W o "a O U� ZOZ°°, Z ca F) 00 ¢ o ¢ v) w ¢o F M0 !nQ Z Z ZU 10 w w N T Z Q ° 3 >m Mo °w� a.m Mo _ cc J W QH S<w wi3 L!!i?SV3 M1l50NJY N ll1.m35v31.\S UHn N 5M. 1Z� �goa 0 o=n w a 5 3 al b CO Z=S�a wosoe✓$ °dam '< w p fa° "°mzaLL z W o p a -- r-------_- _--�� z O zwo F .l !n fu=mm `�" A § _ 0 waai�$ � °-_,'"'� o U ouM1inm�_ o LL I w I— zFw 0o m� 7-9 ;I ' w 0 8 LL �'w w w"F u� ° m ¢ pQOQ s a 1 LL�� > 1 W Z w o n v uS w /y a �y< <� oho O w o 0 0 o u m JN ��� o as 12?tuLil w - << Z R O R K N o� I Ir �!y w 'fi aaulBuaoeBe+pw 50[CB 4epi ocioe ' OSZ9'ZZC'BOZ-� ZOl a1S'IQ eis �c�S818 g �3 mob£ OWGINVI(MANEm NOISIAI(ignS 1NIOd 2WiS e <� Q` ¢gE. T.R E - s �J € aa 3- s g11o G I r e O Q o s w u s 3 I 0 —C, G B G E 5 5 F G G E O I \� l � � � W � 6 � n 5 � ?S � � wII - YO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wl I I — X21 I I I t 13 __—__— Q__ ____—_— — llryy 1 / 1 w .6 eee beeoea w so¢e oven; oe;oe � � } C7 a99���so� d ZOIa15'Oe;sse a SBtB ° y za tea, OHVCJl'NVICIRi3W o` Z Z M w NOISIn1a8f1S 1NIOd 2�d1S < � Ccz a - p- a -w - 3 - � o s o a i W z s ~ W �� i h J� -z. F a� W _ - �s � � �5 G� � x• F n j i � � ;o6 I - — 0o m � o < w a 4N.BRIGHT 0 71 b/ 0 o a7 e� ; Z,° i1 - E < ; - -�- --- -� 9 If J�s; ixz al /� }l 1. lt =- — — !� -IJ�� 1, l C) \ k , 9n 1 I z saa nee =i,� W A z cc w p 110 o w '6 taau 6ua0em�ay�w SOGCB oyept omog 09BB'ZLf'BOII'� ZOA eiB'AOezze�ey 68tB HPRp dei �2WWo Mod£ �/ t�Ia../ OHdal �NHICMADN NOISInlcons 1NIOd 2]ViS a c n m S N R n e r S � I I I I I I � 8 8 I I I I I I 9en52=W'u0.a tG a,.s exr, +d �— I ( I Z=v�0'w1.9 8 <99A5 t£ury d SII I —1_ T-.__—_ SB'tteZ s9£c,z II III _ I ! I I I I e I E{£(eL -- r -- g 1 1 1 SSS46G, I'"I., ss'Gfisim'W'�ut .H I I 6i(5Lt3wtl I I I - L''9d I tzs� Ytm3 w+e I G I A6965L ot+p'N e l I L(z w.y it •l ��''+ I I I 'I o -- — — — L ( � p e d I its?6i ic?e r3�w'aa 1 I I 6 LL o a a i t 1 s —� �eALo.BTM � �: Y w _ a —} ~- I SO 0 0 - i n Udt�� ° OHVQI'NVIOIL'3W y � � n � � ° - e_� t Z Q 8 g - a NOIGIAiosnG 9Al'alO 2lV-LG 0. J i 13 - d3 €g,-� - -"sSY°-im�S r$o- "om°Ep e 0 u 3 o ,- � � � .- � ,- r• ,- � r r r ,- 3 -� -< � r � z �� e d 9 °n i m aV�o"c uj o` aao ?$ W _ - i° Ju ✓ - �nFl° - ° <y pWo� piF O'm mo ca W `go> _ - §%88 - _ _ W - on`�s` - eg`" 'o`°o` ^8`= =Sa = -:8�: W LhL Q z8i$oc3e�eomo°toes£<od_d �.. r__nz FX$3.,°°<`•<<9o9$b5<e<E"s°o � °�- `°ze" _e34 _ i.:i i i °��i��=�� J - „ n m V ^ ., m ^ •,°Rd°^ ^ ^^ e ^ m ^ •., a " ^ ^ J �Ya n `a mm��:• iii' s s °C`>fls?pgo ..+0• �<x Y� �`g °z'❑ ^? °0 0 0 �� i 'Da o � p OHV41•NVI41L'3W � ` Z Z O � � g❑ 3� ��> �° °y = g g ; NOIsIAI(n an��la �ldls < on >m W i z� nm �Jm❑ � s<pLLx <'� i ti W _ nm0 � fpU=N nm Ci 0 E CuNd S zy°SCmp; W � � h AFa 01 n g�uOY( is S p ImzFz // ez o� z� iv z I o Y 0 a a ❑ so / LLLLLL.U // ez o� z� iv z I o Y 0 a a LLLLLL.U V d O 0 lu NOIGIAlogns 2AI'a:10 Rz v WN I I'M < A tg -Mo Qnvi !HN -'M V. f L � « ... .. y. .. >........... ....... . y..:.... & STAR DRIVE - HOUSEOPT ONS maw �: R 3 Arl W '1 a COMMITMENT OF PROPERTY POSTING Per Unified Development Code (UDC) 11 -5A -5D, the applicant for all applications requiring a public hearing (except for a UDC text amendment, a Comprehensive Plan text amendment and/or vacations) shall post the subject property not less than ten (10) days prior to the hearing. The applicant shall post a copy of the public hearing notice of the application(s) on the property under consideration. The applicant shall submit proof of property posting in the form of a notarized statement and a photograph of the posting to the City no later than seven (7) days prior to the public hearing attesting to where and when the sign(s) were posted. Unless such Certificate is received by the required date, the hearing will be continued. The sign(s) shall be removed no later than three (3) days after the end of the public hearing for which the sign(s) had been posted. I am aware of the above requirements and will comply with the posting requirements as stated in UDC 11-5A-5. 1l5 1 //� Applicant/agent signature Date1 Community Development ■ Planning Division ■ 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Ste. 102 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 Fax: 208-888-6854 www.meridiancity.org/planning (03/23/2018) CANYWR/GNT N O li "1 H W f 5 7 July 13, 2018 ALC Architecture Attention: Richard Wilmot Subject: Razberry Crossing Update E Star Drive and Bright Angel Ave Meridian, Idaho Cartwright Project No. 318012 INTRODUCTION Page 1 of 2 This letter presents the results of our geotechnical evaluation to assess the 3 adjacent properties at the northwest corner of E Star Drive and N Bright Angel Avenue in Meridian, Idaho. The proposed project includes assessing the current conditions at the site and reviewing the Initial Geotechnical Report prepared for the development referenced as follows: • Report — Geotechnical Engineering Services Razberry Crossing Subdivision prepared by GeoEngineers and dated July 15, 2004. FIELD EVALUATION As part of our study, we performed a field evaluation of the site on July 12, 2018. Observations were made of the existing conditions at the site, including the exposed subgrade soils. Exposed subgrade soils were observed across the site and a hand auger excavation was performed to assess the current subsurface conditions. Photographs of the site are presented below. Photo 1: Looking southeast across site Photograph 2: Looking west across site Observations noted during our field evaluation included: • The exposed subgrade soils observed across the site consist of fine silty sand with varying amounts of gravel. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING BOISE,ID (208)484-1090 CARTWRIGNr N 0 R T H W C S T Page 2 of 2 • The subgrade soils observed in the hand auger boring consist of predominantly silty soils with varying amounts of sand and some gravel. • No groundwater was observed in the hand auger hole. CONCLUSIONS The results of our field evaluation and review indicate that the surface and subsurface conditions are consistent with those presented in the above reference report. In our opinion, the conclusions and recommendations from the referenced report are still valid for the proposed development. Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our letter prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, either expressed or implied. Sincerely, Cartwright Northwest Seth P. Olsen, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer 14"N7 T�OFID GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING BOISE, ID (208) 484-1090 Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Razberry Crossing Subdivision Meridian, Idaho July 15, 2004 For Consacre G �/ , Consacre 3090 Gentry Way, Suite 150 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Attention: Amanda Alvaro GEOENGINEERS� July 15, 2004 Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Razberry Crossing Subdivision Meridian, Idaho GEI File No. 10283-001-03 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services at the proposed Razberry Crossing subdivision to be located at the intersection of Locust Grove Road and East Star Lane in Meridian, Idaho as shown in the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. Our services have been completed in general accordance with our proposal dated May 20, 2004, which you authorized on June 8, 2004. We understand that the site is to be developed with a mixture of commercial and residential properties. The project will include building residential streets (that will be dedicated to ACRD) and a storm water infiltration system. We completed a preliminary geotechnical engineering study for this site dated November 22, 2002. The purpose of this study was to provide design level geotechnical engineering services for the project. Specifically, we completed the following services: 1. Excavated a series of 10 test pits at representative locations within the site using a backhoe subcontracted to GeoEngineers. 2. Evaluated the pertinent physical properties of the soil in our laboratory. Laboratory testing included moisture content determinations. No R -value tests were completed because of the silt and clay encountered at the subgrade elevations. 3. Provided earthwork recommendations including site preparation, structural fill criteria, and the use of on-site soils as structural fill. 4. Evaluated the groundwater conditions encountered at the site and estimated the seasonal high groundwater elevation. 5. Estimated the infiltration rate for design of the proposed storm water disposal system. 6. Provided a design pavement section for local residential streets. 7. Summarized our recommendations and conclusions in this report. lConsacre July 15, 2004 Page 2 SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS The property is nearly flat. The site has been historically farmed, and the ground surface drains toward the west. The ground appears to have lain fallow for several years. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the site were explored to depths ranging from approximately 4 to 14 feet by excavating ten test pits on July 2, 2004. The test pits were excavated with a Case 580L rubber -tired backhoe subcontracted to GeoEngineers. The test pits were excavated at the approximate locations shown in the Site Plan, Figure 2. Details of the field exploration, laboratory testing programs and the exploration logs are presented in Appendix A. We excavated three test pits, TP -1 through TP -3, within the proposed infiltration pond. We encountered stiff silt in the upper 31/2 to 41/2 feet. Below the silt, we encountered cemented soil (caliche) to depths of 41/2 to 51/2 feet. We encountered gravel with sand and varying silt content below the caliche to the bottom of the explorations at 101/2to 14 feet. Test pits TP4 through TP -10 were excavated along the alignment of the proposed roadways. The locations for these test pits were staked in the field by the surveyors from Claiborn-Waite Consulting. We excavated within 20 feet of the stakes that they placed. The sod and root zone that we encountered in TP -4 through TP -10 was less than 1/2 -foot thick. Below the root zone, we encountered several feet of stiff silt and/or clay. We often encountered a layer of caliche on the order of 3 to 5 feet below the existing ground surface, and we occasionally encountered silty sand or silty gravel underlying the silt and clay. No groundwater seepage was observed during our explorations. A piezometer was installed to a depth of 14 feet in test pit TP -2, and we returned to the site on July 8, 2004 to measure the groundwater within this piezometer as well as the piezometers installed previously at this site. Our groundwater measurements are shown below. Groundwater depths are expected to vary as a function of season, precipitation, irrigation, and other factors. Test Pit Depth to Groundwater (07-08-04) TP -1 >14.1 feet (dry) TP -1-02 16.5 feet TP -2-02 16.6 feet CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SITE PREPARATION We recommend that the proposed roadway areas be stripped of all sod and vegetation. This material should be wasted off-site or used for landscaping purposes. The prevailing surficial site soils consist of silt and clay and are moisture -sensitive, difficult to operate on and very difficult to compact during wet weather. Rubber -tired vehicles will disturb this type of soil when it is above the optimum moisture content. It readily absorbs moisture and is difficult to dry out. It has a moderate erosion potential in - 1 Geo Eng i n e e r s File No. 10283-001-03 Consacre July 15, 2004 Page 3 place and is easily transported by running water when disturbed. Therefore, silt fences and other measures may be necessary to control erosion and sediment transport during construction. The vegetation and topsoil act as protective layers to the surficial soil and should be removed only where and when necessary. The areas that are stripped or excavated to design subgrade elevations should be proofroiled with heavy rubber -tired construction equipment. Any soft, loose or otherwise unsuitable areas identified during proofrolling should be recompacted if practical or removed and replaced with structural fill. We recommend the proofrolling of the subgrade be observed by a representative from our firm to assess the adequacy of the subgrade conditions and to identify areas needing remedial work. We recommend that this procedure not be performed during wet weather. If construction needs to continue during wet weather, it may be necessary to overexcavate disturbed material and place a layer of sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines to provide a working surface over moisture -sensitive soils. STRUCTURAL FILL General All new fill placed in roadway areas should be placed and compacted as structural fill subsequent to site preparation work as appropriate. The fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness or that necessary to obtain adequate compaction. Each lift must be thoroughly and uniformly compacted. We recommend that all structural fill placed within 2 feet of the bottom of pavement elevation be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (MDD) as determined by the ASTM D 1557 test procedure. Below this depth in roadway areas, we recommend that structural fill be compacted tout least 90 percent of the MDD. All structural fill material should be free of organics, debris and other deleterious material, with no individual particles larger than 5 inches in diameter or one-half the lift thickness, whichever is smaller. As the amount of fines increases, the soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult to achieve, particularly during wet weather. Generally, soils containing more than about 5 percent fines by weight cannot be properly compacted when the moisture content is more than a few percent from optimum. Sufficient earthwork monitoring and a sufficient number of in-place density tests should be performed to evaluate fill placement and compaction operations and to confirm that the required compaction is being achieved. Suitability of On -Site Soil The surficial soils we encountered within the upper 4 to 5 feet consist of silt and clay. The clay material is not suitable for structural fill. The gravel with sand soil typically encountered below the silt and clay are well suited for use as structural fill; however, it is buried beneath several feet of overburden and it will not likely comprise a significant amount of the soil excavated for utility installation. The silt soils can be used as structural fill, but they are moisture sensitive and will be difficult to compact if the moisture content is more than a few percent either wet or dry of optimum. From previous experience with similar soils, we would expect the optimum moisture content to be in the range of 14 to 18 percent for the silt and clay soils. The in-situ moisture contents observed during our investigation suggest that G e o E n g i n e e r s File No, 10283-001-03 Consacre . t 'July 15, 2004 Page 4 moisture will need to be added to the soils to obtain adequate compaction. The moisture content of the soils which we excavated was typically well below optimum for soils excavated above the water table. These samples were obtained during the month of July. We would expect moisture conditions in the soil to be somewhat higher during the winter months. It will likely be necessary to stop placing on-site soil as structural fill during rains. The silt encountered in our explorations has a low swell potential based on the Atterberg limits tests which we completed for our preliminary evaluation of this project, however, the clay (not encountered in our preliminary evaluation) has a moderate swell potential based on Soil Conservation Service soil survey data. We recommend that the clay not be used for structural fill. It should also be removed from below structural improvements that are sensitive to expansion, including, but not limited to, roadways and sidewalks. While we did not complete expansion tests on the clay, it is a low plasticity clay which typically corresponds to a moderate risk of expansion damage to sidewalks and roads. In our experience, covering this type of clay with at least 2 feet of non -plastic soil before constructing sidewalks and pavements will usually protect the flatwork. Imported Soil Imported soil should conform to the recommendations provided in the "General' section above. We suggest that the fines content be limited to about 30 percent and that the Plasticity Index of such fines be less than 10 for imported fill that will be placed during dry weather and on dry subgrades, provided that the moisture content is near optimum to obtain adequate compaction. If structural fill is placed during wet weather or will be reworked during wet weather, we recommend that select imported fill be used consisting of well -graded sand and gravel with a fines content limited to 5 percent based on that portion passing the 3/4 -inch sieve. PERMANENT SLOPES We recommend a maximum permanent slope inclination of 2H:1V (horizontal to vertical) in the native soil or in structural fill placed in accordance with our recommendations. Fill should be carefully compacted on the slope face, or the fill embankment can be overbuilt and cut back to a 2H:1V configuration. Permanent slopes must be hydroseeded or otherwise protected from erosion. Temporary erosion control measures may be necessary until permanent vegetation is established. INFILTRATION CONSIDERATIONS Groundwater We have completed several measurements of the groundwater levels at this site We have also reviewed measurements by the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR) that were obtained from nearby water wells and other sources. These measurements indicate that groundwater in this vicinity typically fluctuates about four to six feet with the seasonal high groundwater typically occurring in late September: Based on our review of the limited IDWR and other data and our readings, we estimate the seasonal high groundwater levels at the location of our piezometers on site (see attached Site Plan, Figure 1) will be as shown in the table below. Fluctuations between the seasonal high groundwater measurements and the November measurements in nearby wells ranged from one to two feet of change. G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 10283-001-03 Consacre + July 15, 2004 Page 5 We estimate that the water levels measured in the month of July are within about 2 feet of the seasonal high groundwater level. The estimates of seasonal high groundwater as shown above are estimates that should be refined by additional measurements that extend through the late summer and early fall months. Infiltration Rates Test pits TP -1 through TP -3 were located in the proposed infiltration pond area of this site (Figure 2). The table below describes the soil conditions and the allowable infiltration rate for each layer. We recommend that the stormwater be discharged into the gravel with sand which we encountered below a depth of about 5%2 feet in these three test pits. Test Pit Groundwater Measurements (feet) Estimated Depth To Seasonal High Groundwater (feet) Piezometer Location November 7, 2002 February 24 2004 March 31, 2004 July TP -1-02 15.0 16.6 + (dry) 16.6 + (dry) 16.5 14 TP -2-02 16.1 17.8 + (dry) 17.8 + (dry) 16.6 14 TP -2 n/a n/a n/a >14.1 (dry) >12 The estimates of seasonal high groundwater as shown above are estimates that should be refined by additional measurements that extend through the late summer and early fall months. Infiltration Rates Test pits TP -1 through TP -3 were located in the proposed infiltration pond area of this site (Figure 2). The table below describes the soil conditions and the allowable infiltration rate for each layer. We recommend that the stormwater be discharged into the gravel with sand which we encountered below a depth of about 5%2 feet in these three test pits. Test Pit Depth Soil Type Allowable Infiltration Rate TP -1 to TP -3 0 to 4 feet Silt Not suitable for infiltration 4 to 51/2 feet Caliche Not suitable for infiltration 51/2 to 14 feet Gravel with Sand 8 inches per hour The allowable infiltration rates listed above are based on the soil types encountered. They also assume that the infiltration system will be designed and constructed in general accordance with Ada County Highway District Development Policy Manual recommendations. If another methodology will be F used, please consult with us to be sure that the infiltration rates above are applicable. PAVEMENT SECTIONS The pavement subgrade should be prepared in accordance with the recommendations in the "Site Preparation" section of this report. No R -value tests were performed at the site, so we have used the default pavement sections as described below which correspond to an approximate R -value of 10. Residential Street Asphalt concrete 21/2 inches 3/4 -inch minus crushed base 4 inches 6 -inch minus aggregate sub -base 14 inches Collector Street 3 inches 6 inches 18 inches G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 10283-001-03 i Consacre • July 15, 2004 Page 6 The thicknesses above are minimum thicknesses for each layer. The materials should meet the requirements specified below. We recommend that the roadway construction be completed in accordance with the current edition of the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC). We recommend that the subbase material conform to all specifications for "6 -inch uncrushed aggregate" as described in Section 801 of the ISPWC. The base course should conform to all of the specifications for "3/4 -inch (Type 1) crushed aggregate for base" as described in Section 802 of the ISPWC. The plantmix pavement should conform to all of the specifications for Class II mix as described in Section 810 of the ISPWC. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by the Consacre and the rest of the design team for the proposed Razberry Crossing Subdivision to be constructed in Meridian, Idaho. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the field of geotechnical engineering in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. Any electronic form or hard copy of this document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of a master document. The master hard copy is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Please refer to Appendix B titled "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" for additional information pertaining to use of this report. File No. 10283-001-03 G e o E n g i n e e r s Consacre Yuly 15, 2004 Page 7 We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to Consacre. Please call if you have any questions regarding this report, or if you need additional information. DOD:DEA:mlh DocId: BOIS\1028300104R.doc Attachments Figure 1 Figure 2 Appendix A Figure A-1 Figures A-2 to A-11 Figure A-12 Appendix B Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. fDougArgo, P.E. Senior Engine �Or avid A. O'Day, P.E. Principal Vicinity Map Site Plan Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing Soil Classification System Logs of Test Pits Moisture Content Results Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use One copy submitted Cc: Brent Claiborn (Two copies) Claiborn Waite Consulting Copyright(D 2004 by GeoEngineers, Inc. All rights reserved. G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 10283-001-03 I I 1 1, . l -J 0 GEOENGINEERS� GeoEnginee'rs APPENDIX A i File No. 10283-001 0 0 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING EXPLORATION PROGRAM The subsurface conditions of the site were explored using a rubber -tired backhoe on July 2, 2004. Ten test pits were completed at the site to depths ranging from 51/2 to 14 feet deep. The approximate locations of the explorations are shown in Figure 2. The explorations were located in the field by the surveyors from Claiborn Waite Consulting. Our test pits were located within approximately 20 feet of the stakes placed by the surveyors within the proposed roadways and within the limits of the proposed infiltration pond as defined by the stakes which the surveyors placed at the corners. The test pits were observed by a geotechnical engineer from our firm who maintained detailed logs and obtained representative samples of the soils encountered for further examination in our laboratory. The soils encountiered were visually classified in accordance with the system shown in Figure A-1. The logs of the explorations are presented in Figures A-2 through A-11. The elevations indicated on the logs are based on interpolation of the topography on the preliminary plat map provided to us relative to the exploration locations. The densities noted on the logs are based on probing the exposed soils with a 1/2 - inch -diameter steel rod, the difficulty of digging and our experience and judgment. LABORATORY TESTING All soil samples were brought to our laboratory for further examination and laboratory testing. Representative samples obtained from the explorations were tested to determine field moisture content. The results of the'.moisture contents are presented in Figure A-12. G e o E n g i n e e r s A-1 File No. 10283-001-03\071504 n i\soila-t.doc SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL COARSE GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL GRAINED SOILS More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL Retained on No. 4 Sieve WITH FINES SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SAND CLEAN SAND More Than 50% SP POORLY -GRADED SAND Retained on No. 200 Sieve More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction SAND SM SILTY SAND Passes WITH FINES SC CLAYEY SAND No. 4 Sieve ML SILT FINE SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC GRAINED CL CLAY SOILS Liquid Limit ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY Less Than 50 MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT More Than 50% SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC Passes CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY No. 200 Sieve Liquid LimitORGANIC E OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT 50 or More I I HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil In Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is In general Moist - Damp, but no visible water accordance with ASTM D2487-90. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on water table Interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE A-1 GWENGINEER��rSOIL i\soila-t.doc Date Excavated: 07/02/04 Equipment: Case 580L a z am a R v7 � c Project: Razberry Crossing 0 Project Location: Boise, Idaho Figure: A-2 ami i a N W 0 5IVI I 1 r2590 10 z a L C lE ML 40 Logged by: DEA Surface Elevation (ft)- 2599.5 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ML Light brown strongly GP -GM Brown fine to coarse moist) o GP Brown fine to coarse 000 (dense, moist) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Test pit completed to 13.5 feet No groundwater seepage observed No caving observed trace to OTHER TESTS AND NOTES Noes: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. The depths on the test pit logs are based on an average of measurements across the test pit and should be considered accurate to 0.5 foot. LOG OF TEST PIT TP -1 Project: Razberry Crossing cc GW C N G.I N EE R S Project Location: Boise, Idaho Figure: A-2 Project Number: 10283-001-03 Sheet 1 of 1 Date Excavated: 07/02/04 Equipment: Case 580L Alk qw Logged by: DEA Surface Elevation (ft), 2599.5 Date Excavated: 07/02/04 Equipment: Case 580L Logged by: DEA Surface Elevation (ft)- 2599.5 NN LU a) M n. a m E CO to o. ` (7[°o I M W °E (9 U) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION o N C Op U OTHER TESTS AND NOTES 0 D 0.2 foot of sod and roots ML Light brown silt with fine sand (stiff, moist) ML Light brown strongly cemented silt with fine sand (hard, moist) (caliche) 2595 5 ° GP -GM Brown fine to coarse gravel with silt and fine to medium sand (dense, ° moist) 0 0 o GP Brown fine to coarse gravel with fine to medium sand, cobbles, trace silt ° ° ° (dense, moist) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 —25900000 10 000 0 Test pit completed to 10.5 feet No groundwater seepage observed No caving observed 0 2585 h 15 o `w c� a g� i5 0 o N 0 1 80-2680 N CU No es: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. 0 The depths on the test pit logs are based on an average of measurements across the test pit and should be considered accurate to 0.5 foot. y LOG OF TEST PIT TP -3 Project: Razberry Crossing G Eta E N G I N E E!RS Project Location: Boise, Idaho Figure: A-4 o Project Number: 10283-001-03 Sheet 1 of 1 k Date Excavated: 07/02/04 Equipment: Case 580L M L-A Logged by: DEA Surface Elevation (ft), 2600 LOG OF TEST PIT TP -4 Project: Razberry Crossing 'E� N N E E R S Project Location: Boise, Idaho Figure: A-5 Proiect Number: 10283-001-03 sheet 1 or i Date Excavated: 07/02/04 Equipment: Case 580L LJ Logged by: DEA Surface Elevation (ft), 2600 Z LOG OF TEST PIT TP -5 Project: Razberry Crossing GMENGINEERS Project Location: Boise, Idaho Figure: A-6 Protect Number: 10283-001-03 Sheet 1 of 1 Date Excavated: 07/02/04 Equipment: Case 580L IRW Logged by: DEA Surface Elevation (ft)• 2601.5 Date Excavated: 07/02/04 Equipment: Case 580L Logged by: DEA Surface Elevation (ft), 2602 > . W p,.,., �r3 a) E a� a> coo m r m0) MO 2f Uui MATERIAL DESCRIPTION w aci o0 �U OTHER TESTS AND NOTES 0 D 0.2 foot of sod and roots CL Brown clay with silt and trace fine sand (stiff, moist) 2600 ML Brown silt with fine sand and trace clay (stiff, moist) ML Light brown strongly cemented silt (dense, moist) caliche Test pit completed to 4.5 feet No groundwater seepage observed 5 No caving observed 2595 a 0 n F U' O W C7 a t� d `a 0 0 N O pI m O N O N 10 Notes: The See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. depths on the test pit logs are based on an average of measurements across the test pit and should be considered accurate to 0.5 foot. 0 G'EOEPJGINEERS LOG OF TEST PIT TP -7 Project: Razberry Crossing Project Location: Boise, Idaho Project Number: 10283-001-03 Figure: A-8 Sheet 1 of 1 . 0 r. Wr -4 ��o.a ani Date Excavated: 07/02/04 Logged by: DEA Equipment: Case 580L Surface Elevation (ft)- 2602 CL 5 10 1 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION trace Test pit completed to 6 teet No groundwater seepage observed No caving observed OTHER TESTS AND NOTES �0 mU 20---J Notes: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. The depths on the test pit logs are based on an average of measurements across the test pit and should be considered accurate to 0.5 foot. LOG OF TEST PIT TP -8 iu Project: Razberry Crossing c 'Eci N N E E'RS Project Location: Boise, Idaho Figure: A-9 a Project Number: 10283-001-03 Sheet 1 of 1 �a E z CL c a E mrn o J C7 v7 0 i 1/11.. CL 5 10 1 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION trace Test pit completed to 6 teet No groundwater seepage observed No caving observed OTHER TESTS AND NOTES �0 mU 20---J Notes: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. The depths on the test pit logs are based on an average of measurements across the test pit and should be considered accurate to 0.5 foot. LOG OF TEST PIT TP -8 Project: Razberry Crossing c 'Eci N N E E'RS Project Location: Boise, Idaho Figure: A-9 Project Number: 10283-001-03 Sheet 1 of 1 0 , ' 9 Date Excavated: 07/02/04 Logged by: DEA Equipment: Case 580L Surface Elevation (ft). 2603 • 't Date Excavated: Equipment: _ 1 10 15 07/02/04 Case 580L Logged by: DEA Surface Elevation (ft), 2604 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION smell 1 0.4 foot of sod and roots MI- I Brown silt with clav and trace Test pit completed to 4.5 teet No groundwater seepage observed No caving observed OTHER TESTS AND NOTES 7 vi C �U �4[ N Notes: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. J °m The depths on the test pit logs are based on an average of measurements across the test pit and should be considered accurate to 0.5 foot. 0 0 Q LOG OF TEST PIT TP -10 Project: Razberry Crossing �,���,Q � N �;� (� E � �� Project Location: Boise, LtiBiIdaho Figure; A-11 Project Number: 10283-001-03 Sheet 1 of 1 E 0 z L t1J 0 N CL (c6 fn C7 0 1 10 15 07/02/04 Case 580L Logged by: DEA Surface Elevation (ft), 2604 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION smell 1 0.4 foot of sod and roots MI- I Brown silt with clav and trace Test pit completed to 4.5 teet No groundwater seepage observed No caving observed OTHER TESTS AND NOTES 7 vi C �U �4[ N Notes: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. J °m The depths on the test pit logs are based on an average of measurements across the test pit and should be considered accurate to 0.5 foot. 0 0 Q LOG OF TEST PIT TP -10 Project: Razberry Crossing �,���,Q � N �;� (� E � �� Project Location: Boise, LtiBiIdaho Figure; A-11 Project Number: 10283-001-03 Sheet 1 of 1 MOISTURE CONTENT DATA Test Pit Depth of Soil Moisture Number Sample (feet) Classification Content %) TP -4 4.0 ML 8 TP -5 1.0 CL 9 TP -6 1.0 CL 8 TP -8 1.0 ML 10 TP -10 1.0 ML 10 GEOENGINEER� MOISTURE CONTENT RESULTS FIGURE A-12 GWENGINEERS� APPENDIX E `_] G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 10283-00 APPENDIX B �I REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE' This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of this report. GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, PERSONS AND PROJECTS This report has been prepared for use by Consacre and the rest of the design team for Razberry Crossing to be located northwest of the intersection of Locust Grove and East Star Lane as shown in Figure 1. This report may be made available to local regulators for review. This report is not intended for use by others, and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. GeoEngineers structures our services to meet the specific needs of our clients. For example, a geotechnical or geologic study conducted for a civil engineer or architect may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer or architect that are involved in the same project. Because each geotechnical or geologic study is unique, each geotechnical engineering or geologic report is unique, prepared solely for the specific client and project site. No one except Consacre and the design team should rely on this report without first conferring with GeoEngineers. This report should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OR GEOLOGIC REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET OF PROJECT -SPECIFIC FACTORS This report has been prepared for the Razberry Crossing Subdivision in Meridian, Idaho. GeoEngineers considered a number of unique, project -specific factors when establishing the scope of services for this project and report. Unless GeoEngineers specifically indicates otherwise, do not rely on this report if it was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or • completed before important project changes were made. For example, changes that can affect the applicability of this report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure; • elevation, configuration, location, orientation or weight of the proposed structure; • composition of the design team; or • project ownership. If important changes are made after the date of this report, GeoEngineers should be given the opportunity to review our interpretations and recommendations and provide written modifications or confirmation, as appropriate. 1 Developed based on material provided by ASFE, Professional Firms Practicing in the Geosciences; www.asfe.org. G e o E n gin e e r s B-1 File No. 10283-001-03\071504 V SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE This geotechnical or geologic report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. The findings and conclusions of this report may be affected by the passage of time, by manmade events such as construction on or adjacent to the site, or by natural events such as floods, earthquakes, slope instability or groundwater fluctuations. Always contact GeoEngineers before applying a report to determine if it remains applicable. MOST GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGIC FINDINGS ARE PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on field observations from widely spaced sampling locations at the site. Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. GeoEngineers reviewed field and laboratory data and then applied our professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly, from those indicated in this report. Our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS ARE NOT FINAL Do not over -rely on the preliminary construction recommendations included in this report. These recommendations are not final, because they were developed principally from GeoEngineers' professional judgment and opinion. GeoEngineers' recommendations can be finalized only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. GeoEngineers cannot assume responsibility or liability for this report's recommendations if we do not perform construction observation. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by GeoEngineers should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork activities are completed in accordance with our recommendations. Retaining GeoEngineers for construction observation for this project is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OR GEOLOGIC REPORT COULD BE SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION Misinterpretation of this report by other design team members can result in costly problems. You could lower that risk by having GeoEngineers confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain GeoEngineers to review pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering or geologic report. Reduce that risk by having GeoEngineers participate in pre-bid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation. DO NOT REDRAW THE EXPLORATION LOGS Geotechnical engineers and geologists prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a G e o E n g i n e e r s B -Z File No. 10283-001-03\071504 geotechnical engineering or geologic report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. GIVE CONTRACTORS A COMPLETE REPORT AND GUIDANCE Some owners and design professionals believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give contractors the complete geotechnical engineering or geologic report, but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with GeoEngineers and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A pre- bid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might an owner be in a position to give contractors the best information available, while requiring them to at least share the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Further, a contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in your project budget and schedule. CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE SAFETY ON THEIR OWN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Our geotechnical recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's procedures, methods, schedule or management of the work site. The contractor is solely responsible for job site safety and for managing construction operations to minimize risks to on-site personnel and to adjacent properties. READ THESE PROVISIONS CLOSELY Some clients, design professionals and contractors may not recognize that the geoscience practices (geotechnical engineering or geology) are far less exact than other engineering and natural science disciplines. This lack of understanding can create unrealistic expectations that could lead to disappointments, claims and disputes. GeoEngineers includes these explanatory "limitations" provisions in our reports to help reduce such risks. Please confer with GeoEngineers if you are unclear how these "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" apply to your project or site. GEOTECHNICAL, GEOLOGIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERCHANGED The equipment, techniques and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical or geologic study and vice versa. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering or geologic report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Similarly, environmental reports are not used to address geotechnical or geologic concerns regarding a specific project. G e o E n g i n e e r s B-3 File No. 10283-001-03\071504