HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-05-03
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING AGENDA
City Council Chambers
33 East Broadway Avenue
Meridian, Idaho
Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 6:00 PM
Item 1:Roll-Call Attendance
_X__Lisa Holland _X__Steven Yearsley
_O__Gregory Wilson _O__Ryan Fitzgerald
_X__Jessica Perreault _X _Bill Cassinelli
__X _Rhonda McCarvel - Chairperson
Item 2:Adoption of Agenda
Adopted
Item 3:Consent Agenda
Approved A.Approve Minutes of the April 19, 2018 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting
Item 4:Action Items
Land Use Public Hearing Process: After the Public Hearing is opened the staff
report will be presented by the assigned city planner. Following Staff's report the
applicant has up to 15 minutes to present their application. Each member of the
public may provide testimony up to 3 minutes or if they are representing a larger
group, such as a Homeowners Association, they are allowed 10 minutes. The
applicant is then allowed 10 additional minutes to respond to the public's comments.
No additional public testimony is taken once the public hearing is closed.
A.Public Hearing for Paramount Self Storage (H-2018-0033) by
Brighton Corporation, Inc. Located on the North Side of E.
Archerfield St. and West of N. Meridian Rd.
1. Request: A Conditional Use Permit for a Self-Storage Facility on
3.56 Acres of Land in a C-G Zoning District
Continued to 05/19/18
B.Public Hearing for Calvary Chapel (H-2018-0031) by Calvary
Chapel Meridian, Located at 3600 W. Nelis Ave.
1. Request: A Conditional Use Permit for a Church on 8.36 Acres of
Land in the I-L Zoning District
Approved
C.Public Hearing for Zimmerman Auto Body (H-2018-0029) by Brian
Zimmerman located at 1775 W. Pine Ave.
1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of a total of 1.12 Acres of Land
with the I-L (0.72 Acres) and R-8 (0.42 Acres) Zoning Districts
Recommend Approval to Council. Scheduled for 06/05/18
Adjourned 6:32 PM
Meridian Planning and Zoning Meeting May 3, 2018.
Meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of 2018, was called to order
at 6: 00 p.m. by Chairman Rhonda McCarvel.
Members Present: Chairman Rhonda McCarvel, Commissioner Steven Yearsley,
Commissioner Jessica Perreault, Commissioner Cassinelli and Commissioner Lisa
Holland.
Members Absent: Commissioner Gregory Wilson and Commissioner Ryan Fitzgerald.
Others Present: Chris Johnson, Andrea Pogue, Sonya Allen, and Dean Willis.
Item 1: Roll-call Attendance
__X____ Lisa Holland ___X___ Steven Yearsley
______ Gregory Wilson _______ Ryan Fitzgerald
__X___ Jessica Perreault ___X___ Bill Cassinelli
___X___ Rhonda McCarvel-Chairman
McCarvel: Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. At this time I would like to call to order
the regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission on
May 3rd, 2018. Let's begin with roll call.
Item 2: Adoption of Agenda
McCarvel: Okay. Thank you. The first item on the agenda is the adoption of the
agenda. Could I get -- we have one item that will be opened only to be continued and
that item is 4-A, Paramount Self Storage, and so we will not be hearing any testimony
on that this evening. So, could I get a motion to adopt the agenda as amended?
Holland: So moved.
Perreault: Second.
McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to adopt the agenda. All those in favor
say aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. THREE ABSENT.
Item 3: Consent Agenda
A. Approve Minutes of the April 19, 2018 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 17, 2018 – Page 4 of 108
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
May 3, 2018
Page 2 of 11
McCarvel: The next item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda and we have one item
on the Consent Agenda, the approval of the minutes for the April 19th Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting. Could I get a motion to accept the Consent Agenda?
Holland: So moved.
Perreault: Second.
McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to adopt the Consent Agenda. All those in
favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. THREE ABSENT.
McCarvel: So, at this time I would like to briefly explain the public hearing process for
this evening. We will open each item individually -- and I'm going to stop just
momentarily and will knowledge on the record that Commissioner Cassinelli is present.
So, we will open each item individually and, then, start with the staff report. The staff
will report their findings regarding how the item adheres to our Comprehensive Plan and
Uniform Development Code, with the staff's recommendations. After the staff has made
their presentation the applicant will come forward to present their case for the approval
of their application and respond to any staff comments. The applicant will have 15
minutes to do so. After the applicant has finished we will open to public testimony.
There is a sign-up sheet in the back as you enter for anyone wishing to testify. Any
person testifying will come forward and be allowed three minutes. If they are speaking
for a larger group, like an HOA, and there is a show of hands to represent that group,
they will be given up to ten minutes. After all testimony has been heard, the applicant
will be given another ten minutes to have the opportunity to come back and respond if
they desire. After that we will close the public hearing and the Commissioners will take
the opportunity to discuss and, hopefully, be able to make a recommendation to City
Council.
Item 4: Action Items.
A. Public Hearing for Paramount Self Storage (H-2018-0033) by
Brighton Corporation, Inc. Located on the North Side of E.
Archerfield St. and West of N. Meridian Rd.
1. Request: A Conditional Use Permit for a Self-Storage
Facility on 3.56 Acres of Land in a C-G Zoning District
McCarvel: So, at this time I would like to open the public hearing for Item 4-A, public --
Paramount Self Storage, H-2018-0033. This item has been requested for a
continuance to May 7th because of signage -- improper signage.
Perreault: What date was that?
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 17, 2018 – Page 5 of 108
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
May 3, 2018
Page 3 of 11
McCarvel: May 17th. And I think we have a draft of May 17th's agenda. So, if there is
no discussion, could I get a motion to continue H-2018-0033?
Perreault: So moved.
Cassinelli: Second.
McCarvel: Okay. It has been moved and seconded to continue H-2018-0033 to May
17th. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. TWO ABSENT.
B. Public Hearing for Calvary Chapel (H-2018-0031) by Calvary
Chapel Meridian, Located at 3600 W. Nelis Ave.
1. Request: A Conditional Use Permit for a Church on 8.36
Acres of Land in the I-L Zoning District
McCarvel: So, we will move on to open the public hearing for H-2018-0031, Calvary
Chapel, and we will begin with the staff report.
Allen: Thank you, Madam Chair. The first application before you tonight is a request for
a conditional use permit -- and let me get on the right slide here. This site consists of
8.36 acres of land. It's zoned I-L, light industrial, located at 3600 West Nelis Avenue.
Adjacent land use and zoning. To the north is the city's wastewater treatment plant,
zoned I-L. To the west is vacant land owned by the city for a future water reservoir,
zoned C-N and agricultural land zoned RUT in Ada county. To the south is vacant,
undeveloped land, zoned C-G. And to the east is also vacant, undeveloped land, zoned
I-L. This property was annexed back in 2004 and included in the subdivision plat for
McNelis Subdivision. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation is
mixed use, nonresidential. The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use
permit for a church in the I-L zoning district. The site plan submitted depicts a 28,000
square foot church, with access via a local street within the subdivision. Parking, drive
aisles, a large grassy area with a walking path, provided -- providing a connection from
Nelis Avenue to the pathway along the west and north property boundaries and a future
parking area. Several conceptual building elevations were submitted with this
application as shown that demonstrate what the future building may look like. The
structure is proposed to be two stories in height to allow for a high ceiling height in the
main worship area with offices, meeting rooms, et cetera, above. Building materials are
proposed to consist of a mix of materials, including glass, stucco, metal panels and
stone-type materials on the front facade, with the goal of using common materials in
uncommon ways. For example, texture, pattern, orientation to provide visual interest.
The future structure is required to comply with the design standards listed in the UDC
and the Architectural Standards Manual. Staff is recommending the commercial
standards, rather than industrial apply to the proposed structure due to the type of use
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 17, 2018 – Page 6 of 108
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
May 3, 2018
Page 4 of 11
proposed and the commercial properties and uses to the south and the east. Written
testimony has been received from Ed Mechtel, the applicant. He is requesting the
project be held to the industrial design standards, rather than the commercial design
standards as recommended by staff. Staff is recommending approval of the subject
conditional use permit and stands for any questions.
McCarvel: Okay. Any questions for staff?
Perreault: Madam Chair?
McCarvel: Commissioner Perreault.
Perreault: Could you give us -- or give -- well, give all of us an idea of some examples
of the differences between the commercial and industrial standards?
Allen: Chairman, Commissioner Perreault, yes. A lot of times the industrial standards
allow for more of the big box warehouse type uses that are typical in industrial areas. A
lot of times industrial buildings will have more metal materials used. They won't have as
much articulation, modulation, varying roof heights, that kind of thing. The elevations
that are shown before you I -- I don't see any obvious issues with meeting the
commercial standards. I think the applicant was just a little concerned that it might end
up possibly costing more money. I don't really want to speak for the applicant, but he
can address his reasons for -- for that request.
Perreault: Thank you.
McCarvel: Any other questions? I see our applicant has come forward. And, please,
state your name and address for the record.
Mechtel: My name is Ed Mechtel. I represent Calvary Chapel in Meridian. The
address is 1550 South Tech Lane, Meridian, Idaho. 83642.
McCarvel: Okay.
Mechtel: And I'd like to thank you for the opportunity to represent our church here this
evening and I'm going to speak only to our industrial standard and commercial
standards concerns. I am grateful that the project has been recommended for approval
and grateful for the help we have received from the staff here. They have been very
supportive. So, I sent the staff this particular return and I have five reasons on here that
we are asking to stay in industrial zoning. One is that the lot in particular question is
industrial zoned at this time and was moved to that particular zoning in 2012 when there
was an amendment to the development agreement with the City of Meridian and the
owner. So, the whole pretense I believe was a mixed zoning development to begin with
and so as you can see you -- and just as staff has reported, the sewer treatment plant
borders us to the north and additional industrial zoning properties border us to the east
and northeast. There is commercial zoning properties directly east and across Nelis
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 17, 2018 – Page 7 of 108
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
May 3, 2018
Page 5 of 11
Avenue to this particular parcel. Due to the position of the building on the lot we have
been asked to create an enlarged zone of landscaping to kind of conceal the parking
and make the project look nicer and given that request we feel like the building won't
very well be seen much at all from the public or from the street and think that we would
like to have a little bit more flexibility in the industrial zoning standards. The particular
project right now is -- is the cost of about 5.5 million dollars and we would like to
minimize any budgetary impact over and above that in the project and while I can't really
say that that's exactly what would happen, we would like the freedom to be able to, you
know, be cost-effective. As you can see by the elevations submitted we are not trying
to create a box-type of building. We want it to be very appealing and we want it to be,
you know, an enhancement to the subdivision. Although the lots southeast and south
are zoned commercial, the overall project, both building and landscaping, will be an
enhancement to the subdivision and the future development opportunities there and it's
our intention to create a very nice building. We are not looking for a square box. We
want it to be appealing and we want it to be something that the City of Meridian and the
citizens that come to our church and those that will be coming to our church would really
enjoy and be beneficial. I would also like to cite -- in the beginning of the standards
manual -- it's actually on page A-4, there is two things here that are mentioned and --
that you can -- design standards exception is what it says in this heading. In the second
bullet down there it says does strict adherence to the standards create inconsistency in
the design objective of the proposed development and we just kind of feel like the mixed
use and mixed zoning in the development was attractive to us to begin with and that we
really feel like it would just not be detrimental to appearance or the development of the
property to remain in the I-L zone and to be able to stick to the industrial standards in
the design manual. That's all I have got.
McCarvel: Thank you. Are there any questions for the applicant? Okay. I do not have
anybody signed up on the sheet that indicates that they would wish to testify, but is
there anyone in the room that wishes to testify on this application? Okay. Last chance
at any questions for the applicant. Okay. So, at this time could I get a motion to close
the public hearing for Item H-2018-0031?
Cassinelli: So moved.
Holland: Second.
McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to close the public hearing for Item
H-2018-0031. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. TWO ABSENT.
McCarvel: I personally think it's a great use of the property. I'm glad to see it. I -- I
would be somewhat in support of the staff of having that -- I mean just because they
have already presented such beautiful facades, I think they are already in that
commercial -- I mean at least at the front of the building, because the back of the
building, obviously, isn't going to be seen by anybody but the storage lot on the other
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 17, 2018 – Page 8 of 108
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
May 3, 2018
Page 6 of 11
side. But that entryway I think is beautiful, so I don't know what exactly -- how the rest
of the Commission feels about putting some teeth into that and making that just -- since
it is a transit -- it is a transitional lot between other commercial and the industrial next to
it, with -- out in front of it is a commercial subdivision, which I think they have presented
a beautiful -- beautiful façade options.
Yearsley: So, are you thinking we should hold to the standard of the commercial or
allow him the industrial?
McCarvel: Is it possible to have commercial on the front of the building and allow them
to do what they want on the back? Allow more flexibility -- allow that commercial -- or
industrial look to the back of the building?
Allen: Yes, Madam Chair. That -- design standards really aren't applicable when the
building or part of the building isn't viewable from the public street or a public space. If
you would like to specifically, you know, state that the commercial standard should
apply to the front, though, that's -- that's perfectly fine.
Cassinelli: Madam Chair?
McCarvel: Commissioner Cassinelli.
Cassinelli: I -- to me it seems fine to -- to go with industrial. I don't -- I think their plan --
their intent is to not have, you know, four-sided, tilt-up concrete walls and want to make
it attractive. They want to -- you know, they want to have some -- some beauty there.
It's tucked back in behind other commercial and like was brought up, it backs up to the
wastewater treatment plant and a storage unit. So, where it's located I think -- I think
the industrial -- I like what I have seen and to keep it in the industrial design standards I
think it will -- I think it will look good and it will fit in well.
McCarvel: Yeah.
Holland: Madam Chair?
McCarvel: Commissioner Holland.
Holland: I tend to agree. I don't see that their -- the way that they have presented it I
don't see a concern whether it's industrial versus commercial. I think the project seems
like a pretty good fit and it's tucked away from the street, so it's not going to be a -- a
major frontage issue by any means. I guess I'm okay with it either way as well.
McCarvel: Yeah. It just seems like the -- you know, if it -- if they have maybe some
verbiage that it's similar to the example shown or something. But it -- you know, it's
industrial zoning, so I think --
Yearsley: Madam Chair?
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 17, 2018 – Page 9 of 108
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
May 3, 2018
Page 7 of 11
McCarvel: Commissioner -- okay.
Yearsley: I think I would have a tendency to lean to allow them the industrial use.
Interestingly enough, there is a church on Meridian Road south of the interstate that's
actually a tilt-up -- concrete tilt-up wall building. It actually looks very nice. I mean it's
right there against Meridian Road and they have actually done a very good job making
that look really good. So, I think there is ways that they have the flexibility to make it
look good and actually try to keep their costs down as well. So, given where it's at and
the fact that it will be set back quite a ways -- and I do think that they will try to make the
entrance feature more attractive to -- for their patrons, so I would be in favor of allowing
them their industrial.
McCarvel: Okay.
Perreault: Madam Chair?
McCarvel: Commissioner Perreault.
Perreault: I agree with my fellow Commissioners. So, long as it's similar and like in
kind to these renderings I think it will -- it will be great and it is far enough off -- off of
Ustick that I wouldn't have concerns about it.
Holland: Madam Chair?
McCarvel: Commissioner Holland.
Holland: I will attempt to make a motion.
McCarvel: Okay.
Holland: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve
file number H-2018-0031, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May
3rd, 2018, with the following modification: That the staff recommendation for
commercial standards be struck and the -- the application could look at industrial
standards with a note that they would be similar to the presentation that we received
today at the Council meeting.
McCarvel: Okay.
Cassinelli: Second.
McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to approve H-2018-0031 with
modifications. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Congratulations.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. TWO ABSENT.
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 17, 2018 – Page 10 of 108
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
May 3, 2018
Page 8 of 11
C. Public Hearing for Zimmerman Auto Body (H-2018-0029) by
Brian Zimmerman located at 1775 W. Pine Ave.
1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of a total of 1.12 Acres of
Land with the I-L (0.72 Acres) and R-8 (0.42 Acres) Zoning
Districts
McCarvel: Okay. So, we will move on and open H-2018-0029, Zimmerman Auto Body,
and we will begin with the staff report.
Allen: Madam Chair, Commissioners, the next application before you is a request for
annexation and zoning. The site consist of 1.13 acres of land. It's zoned R-1 in Ada
county and located at 1775 West Pine Avenue. The Comprehensive plan future land
use map designation is medium density residential as shown on the future land use
map on the left there. The abutting property to the south is designated General
Industrial. Because the future land use map is a vision for a built-out Meridian and
contains a variety of very diverse land uses and it's not necessarily parcel specific, staff
is recommending the General Industrial designation on the abutting property to the
south is floated to the .72 of an acre portion of the site proposed to be rezoned to I-L.
The applicant is proposing to annex three parcels of land totaling 1.3 acres with R-8,
which is .42 of an acre, and I-L, which is .72 of an acre, zoning districts consistent with
the future land use map designations of medium density residential and the floated
General Industrial. There is an existing home and accessory structure used as an auto
body shop on the property as shown on the site plan. The applicant's narrative states
he's lived in the home and operated the auto body shop since 1999. The shop operates
approximately three to four days a week and all power tools are used inside the shop,
so as not to disturb the adjacent neighbors. Vehicles serviced by the shop are
immediately moved behind the fence and are kept there until the repair work is
completed and the owner picks up the vehicle. In 2000 the subject property was
hooked up to city water and sewer service, but was never annexed. The reason the
applicant is requesting annexation into the city at this time is because of violations in
Ada county related to not being approved to operate the auto body shop at his
residence in the R-1 zoning district. Because the current parcel configuration does not
allow the home to comply with the minimum rear setback standards in the R-8 district,
staff is recommending the applicant submit and obtain approval of a property boundary
adjustment application to enlarge the residential parcel proposed to be zoned R-8, so
that the setback can be accommodated, and combine the narrow parcel along the west
boundary of the site with the larger parcel proposed to be zone I-L. The proposed
zoning boundary is consistent with the future parcel lines. Because letters have been
submitted from adjacent homeowners, which are indicated by all the red dots on the
map on the right there, they are in agreement with the proposed annexation and
continued use of the property as is. Staff is not recommending compliance with any
current development standards. However, if redevelopment occurs in the future, the
development standards in effect at that time will apply, including, but not limited to,
provision of cross-access to adjacent properties to the east and the land used buffers to
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 17, 2018 – Page 11 of 108
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
May 3, 2018
Page 9 of 11
residential uses and districts. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed
annexation and zoning, with a development agreement that restricts the use of the
property to the existing uses and requires a modification to the agreement for any
expansion of the existing use or change in use to another industrial use. Written letters
of testimony from adjacent property owners, as I mentioned, are included in the
application. Staff will stand for any questions.
McCarvel: Any questions for staff? Would the applicant like to come forward. Would
you, please, state your name and address for the record.
Madsen: Sure, Commissioners. My name is Kylie Madsen. I represent the
Zimmermans regarding this matter. I don't have too much to add.
McCarvel: We need your address.
Madsen: Oh, I'm sorry.
Zimmerman: 1775 West Pine.
McCarvel: Into the microphone. He's got to --
Zimmerman: 1775 West Pine and there is 1785 West Pine.
McCarvel: Okay. Thank you.
Madsen: I don't have too much to add to Sonya's presentation, although I will mention
that the applicant is an agreement with the recommendations by the city, including they
would agree to sign the development agreement to that -- when that is available and
ready when that time comes and as you mentioned before the Zimmermans have
sought and obtained the approval of this proposal from pretty much all of their neighbors
and save one that you can see on that map that is being rented currently. So, we would
love to entertain questions if there is any for us.
McCarvel: Any questions for the applicant? All right.
Zimmerman: Thank you.
McCarvel: Thank you very much. Okay. We would normally take public testimony at
this time, but there is nobody that has indicated that they wish to testify, but is there
anybody in the room that would like to do so at this time? Okay. Again one more stab
at questions for the applicant. All right. Then could I get a motion to close the public
hearing for H-2018-0029?
Perreault: So moved.
Holland: Second.
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 17, 2018 – Page 12 of 108
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
May 3, 2018
Page 10 of 11
McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to close the public hearing on H-2018-
0029. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. TWO ABSENT.
Yearsley: Madam Chair?
McCarvel: Commissioner Yearsley.
Yearsley: It's been so long since I have been here you forgot who I am. You know, I
think the staff has done a very good job identifying issues and making appropriate
recommendations, especially with cleaning up the lot lines and making sure that the
zoning fits the use. So, with that I -- I don't see, you know, where they reached out to
their neighbors and no one's really come out and said we don't like this and they have
been in business for so long, I don't see an issue with approving this application.
McCarvel: Yeah. I agree. I think it's a testament to, obviously, the way he handles his
business that he's got so much support surrounding him and especially since he's --
they are there already hooked up with city sewer and water, I think it's appropriate that it
be annexed and if we can take care of a couple minor issues with some property
adjustment and cleaning it all up, I think it's a great addition to the City of Meridian.
Perreault: Madam Chair?
McCarvel: Commissioner Perreault.
Perreault: I agree with the staff's recommendation regarding the DA and I think that's a
wise choice for -- just to make sure that his use is protected in the future use and as
long as the applicant is compliant -- willing to be compliant with that I don't see any
concerns.
Cassinelli: It sounds like everybody is happy.
Holland: Sounds good.
McCarvel: Then would somebody like to make a motion?
Cassinelli: Madam Chair? After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I
move to recommend approval to the City Council of file number H-2018-0029 as
presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 3rd, 2018, with the modification
to have the signed approval of a DA.
Holland: Second.
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 17, 2018 – Page 13 of 108
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
May 3, 2018
Page 11 of 11
McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to approve H-2018-0029. All those in
favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Congratulations. Welcome to the City of
Meridian.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. TWO ABSENT.
McCarvel: Who would like the honors?
Yearsley: Madam Chair?
McCarvel: Commissioner Yearsley.
Yearsley: I move that we adjourn.
Holland: Second.
McCarvel: It has been moved and seconded to adjourn the meeting for May 3rd. All
those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:32 P.M.
(AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.)
APPROVED
RHONDA McCARVEL-CHAIRMAN DATE AP ROVED
ATTEST:`o�4o�nTEDAa��S, J�9
ow
Cityof
C. TAY C - LERK E IDIAN?�
SEAL, ti
m e~
6���)hI TOKtg *A'
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Meeting Date: 5/3/2018
Agenda/Item Number: 3A
Project/File Number: Type in number
Item Title: Minutes for April 19
Approve Minutes of the April 19, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting
I?f APPROIEO
Meeting Notes
Meridian Planning and Zoning Meeting April 19, 2018.
Meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of 2018, was called to order
at 6:08 p.m. by Commissioner Jessica Perreault.
Members Present: Commissioner Ryan Fitzgerald, Commissioner Bill Cassinelli,
Commissioner Jessica Perreault and Commissioner Lisa Holland.
Members Absent: Chairman Rhonda McCarvel, Commissioner Gregory Wilson and
Commissioner Steven Yearsley.
Others Present: Chris Johnson, Andrea Pogue, Bill Parsons, and Dean Willis.
Item 1: Roll-call Attendance
__X____ Lisa Holland _______ Steven Yearsley
_______ Gregory Wilson ___X___ Ryan Fitzgerald
__X___ Jessica Perreault ___X___ Bill Cassinelli
_______ Rhonda McCarvel - Chairman
Perreault: Okay. I think we are ready to get started. Good evening, ladies and
gentlemen. At this time I would like to call to order the regularly scheduled meeting of
the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission on April 19th, 2018, and let's begin with
roll call.
Item 2: Adoption of Agenda
Perreault: Thank you. Next is the adoption of the agenda. First item on the agenda is
the public hearing for Cherry Blossom Subdivision, H-2018-0018, and it will be opened
only for the purpose of continuing this item to the regularly scheduled meeting date of
what I believe is now May 17th; is that correct? It will solely be opened for that purpose.
So, if there is anybody here tonight to testify for that particular application we will not be
taking public testimony this evening. Can I get a motion to adopt the agenda as
amended?
Cassinelli: So moved.
Holland: Second.
Perreault: All those in favor? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. THREE ABSENT.
Item 3: Consent Agenda
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 4 of 42
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
April 19, 2018
Page 2 of 5
A. Approve Minutes of the April 5, 2018 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting
B. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for The Cottages (H-
2018- 0013) by Jeff Likes Located at 2134,2146,2158,2182,2170 and
2194 W. Everest Lane
Perreault: It has been moved and seconded to adopt the agenda. Now onto the
Consent Agenda. Okay. Let's continue. The next item on the agenda is the Consent
Agenda and we have two items on the Consent Agenda, approval of -- we will wait until
everybody exits. Okay. Let's start that over on the Consent Agenda. The next item on
the agenda is the Consent Agenda and we have two items, A, approval of the minutes
for the meeting of April 5th, 2018, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, and
Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law for The Cottages, H-2018-0013. Could I get a
motion to accept the Consent Agenda as presented?
Holland: So moved.
Fitzgerald: Second.
Perreault: Thank you. It's been moved and second to adopt the Consent Agenda. All
those in favor say -- say aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. THREE ABSENT.
Item 4: Action Items
A. Public Hearing for Cherry Blossom Subdivision (H-2018-0018)
by Jayo Land Development Company Located at 615 W.
Cherry Lane
1. Request: A Rezone of 10.74 Acres of Land from the R-4 to
the R-8 Zoning District; and --
2. Request: A Preliminary Plat Consisting of 60 Building Lots
and 10 Common Lots on 10.25 Acres of Land in the
Proposed R-8 Zoning District
Perreault: So, at this time we will open the public hearing for Cherry Blossom
Subdivision, H-2018-0018, and we would like to give the applicant, if he is still here, an
opportunity to speak as to why you would like to continue the hearing.
Breckon: Jon Breckon, Breckon Land Design.
Perreault: Please state your name and address for the record.
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 5 of 42
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
April 19, 2018
Page 3 of 5
Breckon: 6661 Glenwood Street.
Perrault: Okay.
Breckon: Garden City. Commissioner, yeah, the reason we would like to continue it is
we are just not quite ready. We were kind of -- we got it to a point and we are not
meeting the open space requirements and, you know, we want to provide a -- a nice
quality development with lots of amenities. It's a -- it's geared towards 55 and older. If
you're familiar with La Mirada, it's on Meridian close to Chinden, that's what we are
aiming for is something of that nature and -- and so we just haven't worked out all the
details. Have been working with staff a little bit and we have a meeting next week with
staff to work through some of those details and make sure that we are meeting all the
requirements and can be good neighbors. We have had the initial public hearing and
know that it's a -- going to be a sensitive topic and -- because it has been a farm field
for many years. A lot of the adjacent homes are -- lots are -- are larger and they have --
they are used to having it as a field. You know, it's been like that for I think 30 years or
so, you know, we want to be sensitive to that and, you know, I know that one of our
goals is to make sure that all the homes are single story and so that you don't have the
adjacency problem of -- of having a two story looking down into the -- the neighbors
and that sort of thing. So, just need a little more time.
Perreault: Thank you. Are you in agreement with continuing until the 17th of May?
Breckon: Yes.
Perreault: Okay. Do you have any questions?
Fitzgerald: Chris, just for the record, this is the first time that the applicant has
requested a continuance; correct?
Johnson: Yes. This is the first request.
Fitzgerald: Thank you.
Perreault: Thank you. Thank you very much.
Breckon: Okay.
Perreault: Do the Commissioners have any questions for Bill? I know he stepped out
for a moment.
Fitzgerald: Madam Chair, I think we are in a situation where not all the -- it's not soup
yet. We have got a lot of information that's missing. The applicant is still working with
staff and to make sure all parties get a chance to be heard in a finished product. I
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 6 of 42
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
April 19, 2018
Page 4 of 5
would make a motion that we closed the public hearing on H-2018-0018 and the matter
will continue to May 17th.
Holland: Second.
Perreault: It has been moved and seconded to close the public hearing on H --
Fitzgerald: Oh. Thank you.
Perreault: We need to keep it open for the continuance? Okay. All right.
Fitzgerald: All right. I'm --
Perreault: Would you like to withdraw your motion?
Fitzgerald: Yes. Can I make an addendum to my motion to continue it until May 17th;
is that correct?
Perrault: Yes, that is correct.
Fitzgerald: Okay.
Perreault: Thank you.
Holland: Second.
Perreault: Excellent. So, can we get one more motion to adjourn the meeting this
evening?
Fitzgerald: No. We got to take a vote.
Perreault: Is there anything else?
Holland: We have go to vote on that.
Cassinelli: We have got to vote on that.
Perreault: I'm sorry. Vote on the continuance.
Fitzgerald: Yeah.
Perreault: We do need to vote on the continuance. All those in favor? None opposed.
Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. THREE ABSENT.
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 7 of 42
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
April 19, 2018
Page 5 of 5
Perreault: Are we done for this evening, then, Chris?
Johnson: Need a motion to --
Perreault: Okay.
Johnson: Motion to adjourn.
Cassinelli: I move we adjourn.
Fitzgerald: Second.
Perreault: Excellent. We have a motion and a second. All those in favor? Motion
carries.
MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. THREE ABSENT.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:15 P.M.
(AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.)
APPROVED" -�& //,,
Q /-tC(C�
R ONDA McCARVEL - CHAIRMAN
.,
ATTE
C.' JAY CO
4.
- CITY CLERK
513 I /g
DATE APPROVED
Item #4C: Zimmerman Auto Body - AZ (H-2018.0029)
Application(s):
➢ Annexation & Zoning
Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 1.13 acres of land, zoned R1 in Ada County, located at 1775
W. Pine Ave.
Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: MDR; the abutting property to the south is designated General Industrial (GI). Because the
FLUM is a vision for a built out Meridian and contains a variety of very diverse land uses and is not necessarily parcel specific, staff
recommends the GI designation on the abutting property is "floated" to the 0.72 of an acre portion of the site proposed to be rezoned to
I -L.
Summary of Request: The applicant proposes to annex three 3 parcels of land totaling 1.13 acres with R-8 (0.42 of an acre) and I -L
(0.72 of an acre) zoning districts consistent with the FLUM designations of MDR & GI.
There is an existing home & accessory structure used as an auto body shop on the property as shown on the site plan. The applicant's
narrative states he's lived in the home and operated the auto body shop since 1999. The shop operates approximately 3-4 days a
week and all power tools are used inside the shop so as not to disturb the adjacent neighbors. Vehicles serviced by the shop are
immediately moved behind the fence and are kept there until the repair work is completed and the owner picks up the vehicle.
In 2000, the subject property was hooked up to City water and sewer service but was never annexed. The reason the applicant is
requesting annexation into the City at this time is because of violations in Ada County related to not being approved to operate the auto
body shop at his residence in the R1 zoning district.
Because the current parcel configuration does not allow the home to comply with the minimum rear setback standards of the
R-8 district, Staff recommends the applicant submit and obtain approval of a PBA application to enlarge the residential
parcel proposed to be zoned R-8 so that the setback can be accommodated; and combine the narrow parcel along the west
boundary of the site with the larger parcel proposed to be zoned I -L. The proposed zoning boundary is consistent with the
future parcel lines.
Because letters have been submitted from adjacent homeowners (indicated by the red dots) in agreement with the proposed
annexation and continued use of the property as -is, staff is not recommending compliance with any current development standards.
However, if redevelopment occurs in the future, the development standards in effect at that time will apply, including but not limited to:
provision of cross -access to adjacent properties and land use buffers to residential uses/districts.
Staff Recommendation: Approval with a DA that restricts the use of the property to the existing uses & requires a modification to the
agreement for any expansion of the existing use or change in use to another industrial use.
Written Testimony: Letters from adjacent property owners included in the application
Notes:
Possible Motions:
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the City Council of File Number H-
2018-0029, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 3, 2018, with the following modifications: (Add any
proposed modifications).
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend denial to the City Council of File Number H-2018-
0029, as presented during the hearing on May 3, 2018, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2018-0029 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s):
(You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.)
(aouenupoo jol (s)uoseaa oilioads aje}s pmogs no),) :(s)uoseaa
bulnnolloj aqj aol (aaaq alep 6ulaeaq panupoo 1aasul)10 alep 6ulaeaq ay} 01 £600 -860Z -H aagwnN alid anui}uoo 01 anow I
eouenupoa
(•uol}eolldde aagloue QM lenoidde anon( uleb
of op pinoo jueolldde aqj jegnn pue leluep aol suoseaa ogloads ajejs pinogs noA) :suosew buimollo; eqj aoj `g 60Z `£ AeW uo 6ulaeaq
aq} bulanp paluesaid se £600 -860Z -H aagwnN Gild Auap 01 anow I `howllsal oggnd pue jueogdde `gels Ile bulaappoo a9}4y
leluea
'860Z `L6 AeW
UO 6ulaeaq uolssiwwoO 6uluoZ pue 6uluueld Ixau aq} le paaaplsuoo aq of }uawnoop s6uipu� ajeladoadde ue aaedaid of pjS Imp
01 anow aaglJnj I (-suol}eogipow pasodoad Aue ppy) :suoljeolllpow 6upollol aql, gj1M `gl,OZ `£ AeW jo alep 6ulaeaq aqj aol pdaa
}bels aq} ui pajuasaid se 6£00 -860Z -H aagwnN alit anoidde 01 anow I `Auowllsal ollgnd pue jueolldde `}}els Ile bulaaplsuoo aa}}y
lenoaddy
:suol}oW alglssod
:sa}oN
Ienoaddy :uopepuewwooaN JJe}S
'j1elS Aq papuawwom se
Ieloaawwoo ueq} aagjea spiepuels ubisap lep1snpul eqj of plaq aq joaloid eqj s1sanba�j — }ueollddy `IajgoaW p3 :howl}sal uepliM
-Isee pue q}nos eqj o} sesn/saipedord lepawwoo eq} pue pasodoad
asn }o edAj eq} o} anp ain}ona}s pasodoad aq} o} Aldde `lep1snpul ueq} aaq}ea `spiepue}s lepawwoo ago spuawwom }bels
`lenueW spiepuelS Ieanjoajlgoay aqj pue 61, -y£ -t. I oan ui paisll spiepuels u6isap eqj qj!m Aldwoo of paimbaa sI ainjona}s aanjnj aql
•Isaaajul Iensin
apinoid of (uolje}ualao'uaaped `ain}xa}) sAenn uowwooun ui slepajew uowwoo 6uisn jo leob eqj ql!m ape6ej luoaj eqj uo slepajew
adAj auols pue slaued Iejaw `000n}s `sselb bulpnloul slepajew jo xlw a jo Isisuoo o} pasodoad aie slepajew 6uipilnq 'anoge ,o}a `swooa
bullaaw `saogo q}Inn eaae dlgsaonn ulew aqj uI jg61aq bulllao g61q e ao*j nnolle of jg61aq ui salao}s Z aq of pasodoad sl ainjonals aqj
-qII Nool Am 6uiplmg aanlnj eqj legnn sa}ealsuowep }eq} uolleoildde sigl gl1M pelIp ns aaann suolJenala bulppq Ienjdaouoo IeaanaS
•eaae
bul�aed aanjnj a pue `91Is aqj jo salaepunoq gljou �? Isann eqj buole Aenngjed aqj 01 •any s11aN woaJ uoI}oauuoo e 6uipinoid q}ed 6ui� lens
e q}Inn eaae Assea6 abiel a salsle-anlap `6ui�jed `uolslnlpgns aqj ulglinn JaaaJs Ieool a eln ssaooe ql!m goango 'I's 000`8Z e s}oldap
jegj pappgns seen ueld alis y •}olaIslp 6uluoz -I-I eqj ui goango e JOI dno e Jo Ienoidde s1sanbai jueolldde aql :}sanba2l }o Aaewwns
2]N -[>W :uol}eu6lsea wmA ueld anlsuagaadwoa
uolslnlpgnS s1IONoW aol jeld uolsinlpgns aqj ui papnloul pue tOOZ ui paxauue seen Aliadoid sigl :AGojs1H
-I-I pauoz `puel padolanapungueoeA :1se3
E -o pauoz `puel padolanapungueoeA :gjnoS
A}unoo epy ul im pauoz `puel Iemilnopbe pue :N-0 pauoz `alonaasaa aa}enn aan}nj e aol Aj!O aqj Aq paunno puel 1ueoeA :1saM
-I-I pauoz `lueld }uawleaaj aa}ennajseM :glJON
:6uluoZ ip asn pue-i }uaoe(py
•any s11aN 'M 009£ W pa}eool 'TI pauoz `puel jo saaoe g£*g jo slslsuoo alis sigl :uopool pue `6uluoz 6upsixe `A}aadoid jo az!S
IIwaad asn Ieuoillpuoo Q
:(s)uoijeollddy
(6£00-86OZ-H) dno - ledega IG8AI8a :8q# wa}I
seen ails eqj asneoaq 411, Al2W o} aouenupoo aol IsanbaN — (££00-BOZ-H) dno - a6eao}S-jleS junoweaed :yV# wall •
:8pua6y o} sa6ue4a
Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting
May 3, 2018
Item #4B: Calvary Church
Vicinity/Zoning Map
Proposed Site/Landscape Plan
Conceptual
Building Elevations
Item #4C: Zimmerman Auto Body Annexation
Future Land Use Map Zoning Map
Site Plan
House
Shop
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Meeting Date: 5/3/2018
Agenda/Item Number: 4A
Project/File Number: H-2018-0033
Item Title: Paramount Self Storage
Public Hearing for Paramount Self Storage (H-2018-0033) by Brighton
Corporation, Inc. Located on the North Side of E. Archerfield St. and West
of N. Meridian Rd.1. Request: A Conditional Use Permit for a Self -Storage
Facility on3.56 Acres of Land in a C -G Zoning District
S, 1'7 -I
Meeting Notes
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PLANNING AND ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Date: May 3, 2018 Item #
Project Number: H-2018-0033
Project Name: Paramount Self Storage
Pleaseour rint name For Against Neutral Do you wish
p Y 9
to testifv (Y/N)
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Meeting Date: 5/3/2018
Agenda/Item Number: 46
Project/File Number: H-2018-0031
Item Title: Calvary Chapel
9 APPROVED
Public Hearing for Calvary Chapel (H-2018-0031) by Calvary Chapel
Meridian, Located at 3600 W. Nelis Ave.1. Request: A Conditional Use
Permit for a Church on 8.36 Acres of Land in the I -L Zoning District
Aporz W o - r►ye j- 1
Ayes
Meeting Notes
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PLANNING AND ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Date: Mav 3. 2018 Item #
Project Number:
H-2018-0031
Project Name: Calvary Chapel
Please print your name
For
Against
Neutral
Do you wish
to testify (Y/N)
LNE Ni
STAFF REPORT
Hearing Date: May 3, 2018
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate City Planner
208-884-5533
SUBJECT: Calvary Chapel Meridian – CUP (H-2018-0031)
I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant, Calvary Chapel Meridian, has applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for a church
on 8.36 acres of land in the I-L zoning district. See Section IX Analysis for more information.
II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed CUP with the conditions listed in Exhibit B, based on the
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Exhibit C of the Staff Report.
III. PROPOSED MOTION
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2018-
0031 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 3, 2018, with the following
modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) I further move to direct Staff to prepare an
appropriate findings document to be considered at the next Planning and Zoning Commission hearing
on May 17, 2018.
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2018-0013
as presented during the hearing on May 3, 2018, for the following reasons: (You should state specific
reasons for denial and what the applicant could do to gain your approval with another application.)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2018-0013 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date
here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.)
IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
A. Site Address/Location:
The subject property is located at 3600 W. Nelis Ave., in the SE ¼ of Section 34, Township 4
North, Range 1 West.
B. Owner(s):
Ten Mile Investments, LLC
621 N. Robinson Blvd.
Nampa, ID 83687
C. Applicant:
Ed Mechtel, Calvary Chapel Meridian
1550 S. Tech Ln., Ste. 3
Meridian, ID 83642
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 1
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 11 of 42
D. Representative:
Same as Applicant
E. Applicant's Statement/Justification: Please see applicant’s narrative for this information.
V. PROCESS FACTS
A. The subject application is for a conditional use permit. A public hearing is required before the
Planning & Zoning Commission on this matter, consistent with Meridian City Code Title 11,
Chapter 5.
B. Newspaper notifications published on: April 13, 2018
C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: April 6, 2018
D. Applicant posted notice on site by: April 20, 2018
VI. LAND USE
A. Existing Land Use(s) and Zoning: The subject property consists of vacant/undeveloped land,
zoned I-L.
B. Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Use and Zoning:
North: Wastewater treatment plant, zoned I-L
West: Vacant land owned by the City for a future water reservoir, zoned C-N; and agricultural
land, zoned RUT in Ada County
South: Vacant/undeveloped land, zoned C-G
East: Vacant/undeveloped land, zoned I-L
C. History of Previous Actions:
• On July 13, 2004, this property received the following approvals:
Annexation and zoning (AZ-04-004) of 34.6 acres of land from the RUT zoning district
in Ada County to the I-L, L-O, and C-G zoning districts (Ordinance No. 04-1090). A
development agreement (Instrument No. 104093293) was required as a as a provision of
annexation.
Preliminary Plat (PP-04-004) consisting of 16 commercial building lots and 5 common
lots on 34.6 acres of land. On June 7, 2005, a one year time extension (TE-05-003) to
submit the final development plan for McNelis Subdivision was approved by the Director.
• In 2005, a final plat (FP-05-047) was approved that included the subject property (i.e. Lot 4,
Block 2, McNelis Subdivision).
• In 2010, the following applications were approved:
An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (CPAM-10-002) to
change the future land use designation on this property (and the larger McNelis
Subdivision) from Mixed Use – Community (MU-C) to Mixed Use – Non Residential
(MU-NR);
Rezone (RZ-11-001) of 0.43 of an acre of land from the L-O to the I-L zoning district;
and,
Development agreement modification (MDA-11-002) for McNelis Subdivision to update
the zoning of the property and the uses allowed; update the owner information; and
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 2
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 12 of 42
remove the requirement for a conditional use permit on lots that abut Ustick Rd., Ten
Mile Rd., and/or the Nine Mile Creek (Inst. #112054621).
D. Utilities:
1. Public Works:
a. Location of sewer: Sewer service was provided to this lot with the development of the
subdivision.
b. Location of water: Water service was provided to this lot with the development of the
subdivision.
c. Issues or concerns: None
E. Physical Features:
1. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: The Five Mile Creek borders the north boundary of the site and the
Ninemile Creek borders the west boundary of the site.
2. Hazards: Staff is not aware of any hazards that exist on this site except that the creek along
the north boundary of the site is open which may present a danger to young children.
3. Flood Plain: This site is not within a floodplain or floodway.
VII. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS
The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designates this site as Mixed Use – Non
Residential (MU-NR). The purpose of the MU-NR designation is to set aside areas where new
residential dwellings will not be permitted, as residential uses are not compatible with the planned
and/or existing uses in the these areas. See pages 31-33 in the Comprehensive Plan for more
information.
The applicant proposes to develop this 8.36 acre site with a church, consistent with the MU-NR
designation.
Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to
the proposed use (staff analysis in italics):
• “Permit Schools, churches, and other public and civic uses in rural areas, that are compatible with
adjacent uses.” (3.05.02E)
The church is proposed to be located in a rural area of the City; as such, staff is of the opinion it
will be compatible with existing agricultural, wastewater treatment plant, future water reservoir,
commercial and industrial uses.
• “Require industrial areas to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses (e.g.,
landscape, fences, etc.) and community design criteria.” (3.06.01A)
This area has a mix of industrial and commercial zoned land which is only partially developed at
this time. Staff is of the opinion the proposed site design and future building will be compatible
with existing and future uses in this area. The design of the structure is required to comply with
the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual.
• “Improve and protect creeks (i.e. Fivemile Creek) throughout commercial, industrial and
residential areas.” (5.01.01E)
The Five Mile Creek runs along the north boundary of this site and should be protected during
construction.
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 3
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 13 of 42
• “Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to
promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system.” (3.03.03B)
There is an existing multi-use pathway along the north and west boundaries of this site that was
constructed with the subdivision. This pathway will provide for pedestrian access to the proposed
church from nearby residential neighborhoods.
• “Preserve and protect industrial lands for continued industrial use.” (3.06.01I)
This property is industrially zoned but has sat vacant for several years and has not developed.
Although the proposed use is not industrial in nature, it is listed in the UDC as a conditional use
in the I-L zoning district.
• “Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of
final approval and development is contiguous to the City.” (3.01.01F)
City services were provided to each lot as a provision of the subdivision in accord with UDC 11-
3A-21.
VIII. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
A. Purpose Statement of Zone: The purpose of the I-L district is to provide for convenient
employment centers of light manufacturing, research and development, warehousing, and
distributing. In accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, the I-L District is intended to
encourage the development of industrial uses that are clean, quiet and free of hazardous or
objectionable elements and that are operated, entirely, or almost entirely, within enclosed
structures. Accessibility to transportation systems is a requirement of this district.
B. Schedule of Use: Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-2C-2 lists the permitted, accessory,
conditional, and prohibited uses in the I-L zoning district. A church is listed as a conditional use
in the I-L district; compliance with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-6, Church or
Place of Religious Worship, is required.
C. Dimensional Standards: The dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2C-3 for the I-L
zoning district apply to development of this site.
IX. ANALYSIS
A. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation:
The applicant has submitted an application for a conditional use permit (CUP) for a 28,000+/-
square foot church on 8.36 acres of land in the I-L zoning district, as required by UDC Table 11-
2C-2.
Site/Landscape Plan: A site/landscape plan is included in Exhibit A.2 that depicts how the site is
proposed to develop with a 28,000+/- square foot structure, future phases, parking, drive-aisles,
access, and a large grassy area with a walking path providing a connection from Nelis Ave. to the
pathway along the west and north boundaries of the site.
Access: Access is proposed to this site via one driveway via Nelis Ave.
Parking: Off-street parking is required to be provided on the site in accord with UDC Table 11-
3C-6B. The number of spaces is typically determined by the district. However, in this case
because the proposed use is more commercial than industrial in nature, staff recommends the
commercial standards apply to ensure adequate parking is provided for the use.
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 4
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 14 of 42
Based on the square footage of the proposed building (i.e. 28,000 square feet), a minimum of 56
parking spaces are required to be provided based on one space per 500 square feet of gross floor
area (vs. 1 space per 2,000 square feet in industrial districts). A total of 207 spaces are proposed
with an additional area delegated for future parking.
Bicycle parking is also required to be provided on the site at a minimum of one space for every
25 vehicle spaces proposed or portion thereof as set forth in UDC 11-3C-6G in accord with the
standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. Based on 2017 vehicle parking spaces, a minimum of 9
bicycle parking spaces are required. One bicycle rack is depicted on the plat near the entrance of
the building. A detail of the rack should be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance
application to ensure compliance with the aforementioned standards and should have room for the
minimum number of bicycle spaces.
Landscaping: Landscaping is required to be installed on the site in accord with the standards
listed in UDC 11-3B.
A 10-foot wide street buffer is required along Nelis Ave., a local street, as set forth in UDC Table
11-2B-3, landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.
Parking lot landscaping is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C.
Landscaping is required along pathways as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C. A minimum 5-foot wide
strip of landscaping is required along either side of the pathways on the site.
Trash Enclosure: A trash enclosure is depicted on the site plan near the southeast corner of the
building. A detail of the enclosure should be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance
application. The applicant should coordinate with Republic Services on the design and location
of the enclosure.
Specific Use Standards: The proposed use is subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC
11-4-3-6, Church or Place of Religious Worship, as follows:
“Schools, child daycare services, meeting facilities for clubs and organizations, and other
similar uses not operated primarily for the purpose of religious instruction, worship,
government of the church, or the fellowship of its congregation may be permitted to the
extent the activity is otherwise permitted in the district.”
Sidewalk: A sidewalk exists along the frontage of this property on W. Nelis Drive in accord with
the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17.
Pathway: A pathway is not depicted on the Pathways Master Plan for this site. However, the
Park’s Department recommends a pathway is provided within a public use easement for a
pedestrian connection between Nelis Ave. and the existing multi-use pathway along the west
boundary of the site as proposed.
Hours of Operation: The development agreement restricts hours of operation on the site to the
hours between 7:00 am and 10:00 pm as set forth in the development agreement unless otherwise
approved through a conditional use permit. The applicant is in agreement with these hours.
Building Elevations: Several conceptual building elevations were submitted with this application
that demonstrates what the future building may look like (see Exhibit A.3). The structure is
proposed to be 2 stories in height to allow for a high ceiling height in the main worship area with
offices, meeting rooms, etc. above. Building materials are proposed to consist of a mix of
materials including glass, stucco, metal panels and stone type materials on the front façade with
the goal of using common materials in uncommon ways (texture, pattern, orientation) to provide
visual interest.
The future structure is required to comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 5
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 15 of 42
the Architectural Standards Manual; staff recommends the commercial standards, rather than
industrial, apply to the proposed structure due to the type of use proposed and the
commercial properties/uses to the south and east.
Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC): The applicant is required to submit a CZC
application for approval of the proposed use, site layout and building elevations from the
Planning Division prior to submittal of a building permit application.
Design Review: The applicant is required to submit a Design Review application concurrent with
the CZC application for final approval of the site layout and building elevations. The proposed
site layout and structure is required to comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19
and the Architectural Standards Manual. Staff recommends the commercial, rather than industrial,
design standards apply to the proposed structure.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed CUP with the conditions listed in Exhibit B.
X. EXHIBITS
A. Drawings
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site/Landscape Plan (dated: 3/10/18)
3. Conceptual Building Elevations
B. Conditions of Approval
1. Planning Department
2. Public Works Department
3. Fire Department
4. Police Department
5. Sanitary Service Company
6. Ada County Highway District
7. Parks Department
C. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 6
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 16 of 42
Exhibit A.1: Vicinity/Zoning Map
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 7
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 17 of 42
Exhibit A.2: Site/Landscape Plan (dated: 3/10/18)
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 8
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 18 of 42
Exhibit A.3: Conceptual Building Elevations
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 9
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 19 of 42
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 10
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 20 of 42
B. Conditions of Approval
1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1.1 Development of the site shall substantially comply with the site/landscape plan and building
elevations included in Exhibit A, the conditions of approval listed herein, and the provisions of
the recorded development agreement.
1.2 The applicant shall comply with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-6, Church or
Place of Religious Worship.
1.3 The site/landscape plan, dated 3/10/18, included in Exhibit A shall be revised as follows (as
applicable):
a. Depict a minimum 5-foot wide strip of landscaping along either side of pathways on the site
in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C.
b. Depict parking lot landscaping in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C.
c. Depict street buffer landscaping in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C within
the 10-foot wide buffer required along Nelis Ave.
1.4 Hours of operation are limited to the hours between 7:00 am and 10:00 pm unless otherwise
approved through a conditional use permit, as set forth in the Development Agreement (Inst.
#112054621).
1.5 The applicant is required to submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for approval
of the proposed use and site layout from the Planning Division prior to submittal of a building
permit application.
1.6 The applicant shall submit a Design Review application concurrent with the Certificate of Zoning
Compliance application for approval of the site layout and building elevations. The proposed site
layout and structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19
and the Architectural Standards Manual. The future structure shall comply with the
commercial standards, rather than the industrial standards, due to the type of use and the
commercial nature of this area to the south and east of this site.
1.7 Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved conditional use does
not relieve the applicant of responsibility for compliance.
1.8 The Applicant shall have a maximum of two (2) years to commence the use as permitted in
accord with the conditions of approval listed above. If the use has not begun within two (2) years
of approval, a new conditional use permit must be obtained prior to operation or a time extension
must be requested in accord with UDC 11-5B-6F.
1.9 The applicant shall complete all required improvements prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy. It is unlawful to use or occupy any building or structure until the Building Official
has issued a Certificate of Occupancy.
2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
2.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval
2.1.1 Sanitary sewer and water mains/services are currently available on the subject site. The applicant
shall be responsible for the abandonment, per Meridian City standards, of any existing mainlines
or services that are not utilized.
2.2 General Conditions of Approval
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 11
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 21 of 42
2.2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works
Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide
service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover
from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in
conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications.
2.2.2 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of
way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a
single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but
rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The
easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed
easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked
EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for
review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO
NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be
submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval.
2.2.3 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy
of the structures.
2.2.4 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction
inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan
approval letter.
2.2.5 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act.
2.2.6 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting
that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
2.2.7 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H.
2.2.8 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building
pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material.
2.2.9 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or
drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district
or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in
accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate
of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project.
2.2.10 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings for
any new public water and/or sanitary sewer mainlines, per the City of Meridian AutoCAD
standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a
certification of occupancy for any structures within the project.
2.2.11 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of
20% of the total construction cost for all completed public sewer, water and reuse infrastructure
for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the
owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash
deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the
Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for
more information at 887-221.
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 12
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 22 of 42
3. FIRE DEPARTMENT
3.1 COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL - Buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet
(9144mm) or three stories in height shall have at least two means of fire apparatus access
for each structure. The access roads shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less
than one half of the length of the overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to
be served, measured in a straight line as set forth in International Fire Code Appendix
D104.1.
3.2 Buildings over 30’ in height are required to have access roads in accordance with the
International Fire Code Appendix D Section D105.
3.3 As set forth in International Fire Code Section 504.1, multi-family and commercial
projects shall be required to provide an additional sixty inches (60”) wide access point to
the building from the fire lane to allow for the movement of manual fire suppression
equipment and gurney operations. The unobstructed breaks in the parking stalls shall be
provided so that building access is provided in such a manner that the most remote part of
a building can be reached with a length of 150' fire hose as measured around the
perimeter of the building from the fire lane. Code compliant handicap parking stalls may
be included to assist meeting this requirement. Contact the Meridian Fire Department for
details.
3.4 All portions of the buildings located on this project must be within 150’ of a paved
surface as measured around the perimeter of the building as set forth in International
Fire Code Section 503.1.1.
3.5 Provide a Fire Department Key box entry system for the complex prior to occupancy
as set forth in International Fire Code Section 506.
3.6 Commercial and office occupancies will require a fire-flow consistent with International
Fire Code Appendix B to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed
per Appendix C.
3.7 Provide signage (“No Parking Fire Lane”) for all fire lanes in accordance with
International Fire Code Sections 503.3 & D103.6.
3.8 All entrances, internal roads, drive aisles, and alleys shall have a turning radius of 28’
inside and 48’ outside, per International Fire Code Section 503.2.4.
3.9 Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department in
accordance with International Fire Code Section (IFC) 508.5.4 as follows:
a. Fire hydrants shall have a Storz LDH connection in place of the the 4 ½” outlet.
The Storz connection may be integrated into the hydrant or an approved adapter may be
used on the 4 1/2" outlet.
b. Fire hydrants shall have the Storz outlet face the main street or parking lot drive aisle.
c. Fire hydrants shall be placed on corners when spacing permits.
d. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10’.
e. Fire hydrants shall be placed 18” above finished grade to the center of the Storz
outlet.
f. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of the Meridian Water Dept. Standards.
g. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing
buildings within 1,000 feet of the project.
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 13
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 23 of 42
4. POLICE DEPARTMENT
4.1 The Police Department has no concerns with this application.
5. REPUBLIC SERVICES
5.1 Coordinate with Republic Services on the location and design of the trash enclosure.
6. PARKS DEPARTMENT
6.1 The applicant shall comply with the terms of the original pathway easement for existing pathway
adjacent to the property (Dated 29 January 2008).
6.2 Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide pruning, maintenance, and general
clean-up of existing trees within the McNelis pathway easement including low-hanging branches
that project into the pathway route of travel, organic debris on pathway surface, and any other
conditions that would interfere with the use of said easement for public access.
6.3 Prior to final approval, the applicant shall submit a public access easement for a multi-use
pathway [as shown on preliminary site plan, connecting the existing McNelis Pathway to Nelis
Ave] to the Planning Division for Council approval and subsequent recordation. The easement
shall be a minimum of 14’ wide (12’ pathway + 1’ shoulder each side). Use standard City
template for public access easement. Easement checklist must accompany all easement
submittals.
7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
The Ada County Highway District (ACHD) has reviewed the submitted application for
the application referenced above and has determined that there are no improvements
required to the adjacent street.
The applicant shall be required to:
1. Pay a traffic impact fee. If applicable, a traffic impact fee may be assessed by ACHD
and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit by the lead agency. This is a
separate review process and it is the applicant’s responsibility to submit plans directly
to ACHD.
2. Comply with all ACHD Policies and ACHD Standard Conditions of Approval for any
improvements or work in the right-of-way.
3. Obtain a permit for any work in the right-of-way prior to the construction, repair, or
installation of any roadway improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement
widening, driveways, culverts, etc.).
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 14
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 24 of 42
8. NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
9. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT (ITD)
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 15
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 25 of 42
C. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
1. Conditional Use Permit (UDC 11-5B-6E)
The Commission shall base its determination on the Conditional Use Permit request upon
the following:
a. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the
dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located.
Staff finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and the
dimensional & development regulations of the I-L district as required by the UDC (see
Analysis Section IX for more information).
b. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and
in accord with the requirements of this Title.
Staff finds that the proposed use is consistent and harmonious with the UDC and
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation of MU-NR for this site if designed in
accord with the conditions listed in Exhibit B.
c. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other
uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the
general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of
the same area.
Staff finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the
proposed use should be compatible with other existing and future uses in the general area and
with the existing and intended character of the area.
d. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will
not adversely affect other property in the vicinity.
Staff finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the
proposed use will not adversely affect other property in the area.
e. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage
structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer.
Staff finds that sanitary sewer, domestic water, refuse disposal, and irrigation were provided
to this property with development of the subdivision; services will be extended to the
proposed building by the developer. Staff finds that the proposed use will be served
adequately by all of the public facilities and services listed above.
f. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and
services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
If approved, the applicant will be financing any improvements required for development.
Staff finds there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost and that the
proposed use will not be detrimental to the community’s economic welfare.
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 16
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 26 of 42
g. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and
conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general
welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
Staff finds the proposed use will not involve excessive traffic, noise, or odors that will be
detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare.
h. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a
natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
Staff finds that the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any
natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance in this area.
Calvary Church Meridian – CUP H-2018-0031 PAGE 16
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 27 of 42
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Meeting Date: 5/3/2018
Agenda/Item Number. 4C
Ff APPROVED
Project/File Number: H-2018-0029
Item Title: Zimmerman Auto Body
Public Hearing for Zimmerman Auto Body (H-2018-0029) by Brian
Zimmerman located at 1775 W. Pine Ave.
1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of a total of 1.12 Acres of Land
with the I -L (0.72 Acres) and R-8 (0.42 Acres) Zoning Districts
2n d
v)re 0A
Meeting Notes
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PLANNING AND ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
Date: May 3, 2018 Item #
Project Number:
Project Name:
H-2018-0029
Zimmerman Auto Bod
Please print your name
For
Against
Neutral
Do you wish
to testify (Y/N)
1 u o'
��1�►� C..�llllvrlE+-,v)1�1
1V
Zimmerman Auto Body – AZ H-2018-0029 PAGE 1
STAFF REPORT Hearing Date: May 3, 2018
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate City Planner
208-884-5533
Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager
208-887-2211
SUBJECT: Zimmerman Auto Body – AZ (H-2018-0029)
I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT’S REQUEST
The applicant, Brian Zimmerman, submitted an application for Annexation and Zoning (AZ) of 1.13
acres of land with R-8 (0.42 of an acre) and I-L (0.72 of an acre) zoning districts. See Section IX of
the staff report for more information.
II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the proposed AZ application in accord with the conditions of approval
in Exhibit B and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Exhibit D.
III. PROPOSED MOTION
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the City
Council of File Number H-2018-0029, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 3,
2018, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications).
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend denial to the City
Council of File Number H-2018-0029, as presented during the hearing on May 3, 2018, for the
following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial)
Continuance
I move to continue File Number H-2018-0029 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date
here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.)
IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
A. Site Address/Location:
The site is located at 1775 W. Pine Ave., in the northeast ¼ of Section 11, Township 3 North,
Range 1 West. (Parcel #: S1211417501, S1211417515, S1211417523)
B. Owner(s):
Brian Zimmerman
1775 W. Pine Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
C. Applicant:
Same as Owner
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 29 of 42
Zimmerman Auto Body – AZ H-2018-0029 PAGE 2
D. Representative:
Kylie Madsen, Angstman Johnson
3649 N. Lakeharbor Ln.
Boise, ID 83703
E. Applicant’s Statement/Justification: Please see applicant’s narrative for this information.
V. PROCESS FACTS
A. The subject application is for annexation & zoning. A public hearing is required before
the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council on these applications, consistent
with Meridian City Code Title 11, Chapter 5.
B. Newspaper notifications published on: April 13, 2018
C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: April 6, 2018
D. Applicant posted notice on site(s) on: April 18, 2018
VI. LAND USE
A. Existing Land Use(s) and Zoning: There is a residential home with an auto body shop on this
property, zoned R1 in Ada County.
B. Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Use and Zoning:
1. North: Meridian High School, zoned R-4
2. East: Single-family residential home, zoned C-N
3. South: Storage facility (Meridian Storage), zoned I-L
4. West: Single-family residential homes in Conifer Subdivision, zoned R-8
C. History of Previous Actions: This property is currently receiving City water and sewer service
but was never annexed into the City.
D. Utilities:
1. Public Works:
a. Location of sewer: This property is currently receiving sewer service from the City of Meridian.
b. Location of water: This property is currently receiving water service from the City of Meridian.
Issues or concerns: None
E. Physical Features:
1. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: None
2. Hazards: Staff is not aware of any hazards that exist on this property.
3. Flood Plain: This site is not located in the Meridian Floodplain Overlay District.
VII. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS
The subject property is designated Medium Density Residential (MDR) on the Future Land Use Map
FLUM) contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the MDR designation is to allow
smaller lots for residential purposes within City limits. Uses may include single-family homes at
gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre (d.u./acre).
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 30 of 42
Zimmerman Auto Body – AZ H-2018-0029 PAGE 3
The abutting property to the south is designated General Industrial (GI). Because the FLUM is a
vision for a built out Meridian and contains a variety of very diverse land uses and is not necessarily
parcel specific, the applicant requests the GI designation on the abutting property to the south is
floated” to the 0.72 of an acre portion of the site proposed to be rezoned to I-L (see Exhibit C). The
0.42+/- of an acre parcel that fronts on Pine Avenue would remain under the MDR FLUM
designation.
The GI FLUM designation allows a range of industrial uses to support industrial and commercial
activities and to develop areas with sufficient urban services. Light industrial uses may include
warehouses, storage units, light manufacturing, and incidental retail and office uses.
There is an existing single-family residential home and auto body shop that has been operating since
1999 on this property that are proposed to remain and continue for the foreseeable future; no new
development is proposed with this application. Many letters of support have been received from
adjacent neighbors agreeing to the proposed annexation of the property and continuation of the
existing use.
Because the majority of the frontage of the property on Pine Ave. will remain residential (i.e. MDR)
and be zoned R-8, staff is amenable to the existing GI designation on the property to the south being
floated to the portion of the site proposed to be zoned I-L.
Staff is amenable to the GI designation being “floated” for the existing use largely due to letters of
support from adjacent neighbors and the relatively low impact to existing residential uses since the
noise and fumes associated with the shop are contained within the structure and the visual impacts are
screened behind a solid fence. However, staff recommends that any subsequent uses on the industrial
portion of this property be vetted through the development agreement recommended as a provision of
annexation to determine if the continued industrial use of the property is appropriate. Although Staff
deems it appropriate in this case (i.e. with this specific use) to “float” the GI designation for the
subject use, it may not be appropriate for future uses based on the type and intensity of use and
potential impact on adjacent residential neighbors.
Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to
the use of this property: (Staff’s analysis in italics)
Minimize noise, odor, air pollution, and visual pollution in industrial and commercial
development adjacent to residential areas.” (3.06.01B)
The existing auto body shop operates within the existing structure which should contain noise,
odors, and air pollution associated with the use; the applicant’s narrative states that all power
tools are operated inside the shop so as not to disturb surrounding neighbors. The area
surrounding the shop is enclosed by a solid vision fence which screens the area and prevents any
visual pollution from abutting residential properties and the street (Pine Ave.).
The applicant is required to obtain all necessary permits from the Building Department and
comply with life/safety requirements of the Fire Department for the proposed auto body shop.
Encourage industrial development to locate adjacent to existing industrial uses.” (3.06.01C)
The proposed industrial use (i.e. auto body shop) and I-L zoning is located adjacent to industrial
uses and zoning on the abutting property to the south.
Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as
cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads.” (3.03.02N)
There are two existing accesses via Pine Avenue to this property – one to the residential property
and one to the industrial property. Because the applicant’s narrative states that the business only
services 1-2+/- vehicles per month, staff is amenable to both accesses remaining until such time
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 31 of 42
Zimmerman Auto Body – AZ H-2018-0029 PAGE 4
as the property redevelops in the future with Council’s approval; at such time access should be
re-evaluated and a cross-access easement may be required to be provided to the property to the
east.
Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent
parcels.” (3.06.01F)
There are 4 residential properties that abut this site at the west boundary and one at the east
boundary; all but one, which appears to be a rental property, have submitted letters in support of
this application. There is a solid vision fence along the boundaries of the subject property
adjacent to residential uses which screens the property proposed to be zoned I-L where the
existing auto body shop is located.
The residential use of the property is compatible with other residential uses in the general area
and the school across the street to the north.
VIII. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC)
A. Purpose Statement of Zoning Districts:
Residential: The purpose of the residential districts is to provide for a range of housing
opportunities consistent with the Meridian comprehensive plan. Residential districts are
distinguished by the dimensional standards of the corresponding zone and housing types that can
be accommodated.
Industrial: The purpose of the I-L district is to provide for convenient employment centers of light
manufacturing, research and development, warehousing, and distributing. In accord with the
Meridian comprehensive plan, the I-L district is intended to encourage the development of
industrial uses that are clean, quiet and free of hazardous or objectionable elements and that are
operated, entirely, or almost entirely, within enclosed structures. Accessibility to transportation
systems is a requirement of this district.
B. Schedule of Use: UDC Tables 11-2A-2, 11-2A-6 and 11-2C-2 lists the principal permitted (P),
accessory (A), conditional (C), and prohibited (-) uses in the proposed R-8 and I-L zoning
districts respectively. Single-family residential homes are listed as principle permitted uses in the
R-8 zoning district. Major vehicle repair (i.e. auto body shop) is listed as a principle permitted
use in the I-L zoning district; compliance with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-
37, Major Vehicle Repair, is required.
C. Dimensional Standards: Development of the site should be consistent with the dimensional
standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-3 and 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district and 11-2C-2 for
the I-L zoning district.
D. Landscaping: Not Applicable (NA)
E. Open Space & Site Amenities: NA
F. Off-Street Parking: NA
G. Structure and Site Design Standards: NA
IX. ANALYSIS
Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation:
The applicant proposes to annex three (3) parcels totaling 1.13 acres of land with R-8 (0.42 of an
acre) and I-L (0.72 of an acre) zoning districts consistent with the FLUM designations of MDR
and GI as discussed above in Section VII.
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 32 of 42
Zimmerman Auto Body – AZ H-2018-0029 PAGE 5
There is an existing residential home and an accessory structure used as an auto body shop on the
property. The applicant’s narrative states he has lived in the home and operated the auto body
shop since 1999. The shop operates approximately 3-4 days a week and all power tools are used
inside the shop so as not to disturb the adjacent neighbors. Vehicles serviced by the shop are
immediately moved behind the fence and are kept there until the repair work is completed and the
owner picks up the vehicle.
In 2000, the subject property was hooked up to City water and sewer service but was never
annexed. The reason the applicant is requesting annexation into the City at this time is because of
violations in Ada County related to not being approved to operate the auto body shop at his
residence in the R1 zoning district.
The applicant submitted a site plan included in Exhibit A.2 that shows the placement of
structures on the site. The current parcel configuration does not allow the home to
comply with the minimum setback standards of the R-8 district listed in UDC Table 11-
2A-6, specifically the rear setback. Therefore, Staff advised the applicant to submit and
obtain approval of a property boundary adjustment (PBA) application to enlarge the
residential parcel proposed to be zoned R-8 so that setbacks can be accommodated; and
combine the narrow parcel along the west boundary of the site with the larger parcel
proposed to be zoned I-L. The proposed zoning boundary is consistent with the future
parcel lines.
There are specific use standards contained in the UDC (11-4-3-37) that apply to the major vehicle
repair use as follows: 1) Where adjoining a residential property or district, all repair activities
including but not limited to, open pits and lifts) shall occur within an enclosed structure; and 2)
Inoperable or dismantled motor vehicles shall be stored behind a closed vision fence, wall, or
screen or within an enclosed structure and shall not be visible from the street. The applicant’s
narrative states he operates in compliance with these standards.
Because no new development is proposed with this application, current development standards do
not apply, although additional provisions could be added as provisions of annexation through a
development agreement. Because the adjacent homeowners are in agreement with the proposed
annexation and continued use of the property as-is, staff is not recommending compliance with
any current development standards. However, if redevelopment occurs in the future, the
development standards in effect at that time will apply, including but not limited to: provision of
cross-access to adjacent properties and land use buffers to residential uses/districts.
The legal description submitted with the subject application is included in Exhibit C and shows
the boundary of the property proposed to be annexed and zoned. The property proposed to be
annexed is contiguous to land that has been annexed into the City and is within the Area of City
Impact boundary.
The City may require a development agreement (DA) in conjunction with an annexation and
zoning pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site continues to
operate such that it is not a nuisance to adjacent residential neighbors, staff recommends a
DA is required as a provision of the proposed annexation and zoning that contains the
provisions in Exhibit B.
X. EXHIBITS
A. Drawings/Other
1. Vicinity/Zoning Map
2. Site Layout
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 33 of 42
Zimmerman Auto Body – AZ H-2018-0029 PAGE 6
B. Agency & Department Comments
C. Legal Description & Exhibit Map for Annexation & Zoning Boundary
D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 34 of 42
Exhibit A.1: Zoning/Aerial Map
Homeowners that have signed letters stating they agree with the annexation and take no issue with the project
proposed (see application for actual letters).
Note: The applicant states that the owner of the property at 834 N. Tall Pine Pl. lives out of state but sent her realtor
to their door and gave them verbal agreement.
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 35 of 42
2 -
Exhibit A.2: Site Layout
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 36 of 42
3 -
EXHIBIT B - AGENCY & DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1.1.1 A Development Agreement (DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior
to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,
the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer.
Currently, a fee of $303.00 shall be paid by the applicant to the Planning Division prior to
commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the
Planning Division within six (6) months of the City Council granting annexation. The DA shall,
at minimum, incorporate the following provisions:
a. The use of the subject property is limited to the existing single-family residential home in the
R-8 zoning district and the auto body shop (i.e. major vehicle repair) in the I-L zoning
district. Any expansion of the existing vehicle repair use or a change in use to another
industrial use shall require an amendment to this agreement.
b. The applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a property boundary adjustment application
so that the zoning boundary is consistent with parcel lines and so that the existing residential
structure complies with the building setbacks of the R-8 zoning district listed in UDC Table
11-2A-6.
c. The applicant shall maintain compliance with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-
3-37, Major Vehicle Repair, as follows: 1) Where adjoining a residential property or district,
all repair activities (including but not limited to, open pits and lifts) shall occur within an
enclosed structure; and 2) Inoperable or dismantled motor vehicles shall be stored behind a
closed vision fence, wall, or screen or within an enclosed structure and shall not be visible
from the street.
d. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Building Department for the
existing auto body shop upon annexation of the property into the City of Meridian.
2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
2.1 The Public Works Department has no comments on this application at this time.
3. POLICE DEPARTMENT
3.1 The Police Department has no comments on this application.
4. FIRE DEPARTMENT
4.1 The Fire Department has no comments on this application.
5. PARKS DEPARTMENT
5.1 No comments were received from the Park’s Department on this application.
6. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
6.1 No comments have been received from ACHD on this application.
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 37 of 42
4 -
Exhibit C: Legal Description & Exhibit Map for Annexation and Zoning Boundary
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 38 of 42
5 -
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 39 of 42
6 -
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 40 of 42
7 -
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 41 of 42
8 -
D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
1. ANNEXATION & ZONING/REZONE (UDC 11-5B-3E)
Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation
and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation
and/or rezone, the Council shall make the following findings:
a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive
Plan;
Staff finds that the proposed map amendment to the R-8 and I-L zoning districts is consistent
with the existing use and Comprehensive Plan FLUM designation of MDR and the adjacent
floated” Industrial designations for this site. (See section VII above for more information.)
b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district,
specifically the purpose statement;
Staff finds that the proposed map amendment to the R-8 and I-L zoning districts is consistent
with the purpose statements of the residential and industrial districts as detailed in Section
VIII above.
c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety,
and welfare;
Staff finds that the proposed zoning amendment should not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare as all noise and odor related work associated with the auto body
shop will be conducted within the structure. Staff recommends that the Commission and
Council consider any oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this
finding.
d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services
by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not
limited to, school districts; and,
Staff finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon
the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site.
e. The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (UDC 11-5B-3.E).
Staff finds the proposed annexation and zoning of this property is in the best interest of the
City if the applicant complies with the provisions in the Development Agreement included in
Exhibit B.
Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda May 3, 2018 – Page 42 of 42