HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL ME1VLBERS
Tammy deWeerd
Keirk Bird
Chefie McCaadless
William L. M. Na~-.
HUB OF TRFASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433' FAX (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
(208) 884-5533. FAX 888-6854
MEMORANDUM:
March 4, 2002
To.'
From:
Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
Steve Siddoway, Planner II
Bruce Frackleton, Senior Engineering
Re: Cooper Canyon
R CmV D
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OFFICE
· Annexation and Zoning of 5.81 Acres fix~m RUT (Ada County) to R-40 (High
Density Residential), by Wildwood Development, LLC (File No. AZ-02-O02).
Preliminary Plat Approval of 22 Building Lots end 2 "Other" Lots on 5.81
Acres in a Proposed R-40 Zone, by Wildwood Development (File No. PP-02-
000.
· A Conditional Use Permit for a planned Development to Create 22 Four-plex
Units by Wildwood Development (File No. CUP 02-002).
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicant, Wildwood Development, LLC, has applied for annexation and zoning,
preliminary plat and conditional use permit approval of 22 four-plex structures (88 total units) on
a 5.81-acre parcel of land. The gross density of the project would be just over 15 units/acre. The
requested zoning designation for the property is R40. The applicant's preliminary plat request,
if approved, will split the property imo 22 building lots and two "other" lots (one for the parking
area & landscape buffers and one for the storm detention area).
Frontage for the proposed building lots ranges from 63 feet to 66 feet. Lot depth ranges from 73
feet to 85 feet. Lot area ranges l~om 4,599 to 5,525. The requested R-40 zone does not have
minimum lot size or fi'ontnge standards.
LOCATION
The property is located on the south side of Wilson Lane, east of Locust Grove Road and south
of Fairview Avenue.
Planning & Zoning Con~lgsion/Mayor & City Council
March 4, 2002
Page 2
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North: Econo-Lube and Schucks Auto Supply, zoned C-G.
South: Vacant, zoned RUT (County).
East: Butte Fence Company and Aire Manufacturing, zoned I-L.
West: Proposed Fountain Park Apartments, currently zoned RUT, proposed zone R- 15.
ANNEXATION & ZONING ANALYSIS
According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both
the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances
of each proposed zoning amepflment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate
evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment."
The following is the list of standards found in 11-15-11 and analysis by staff:
"A.
Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment;
Stafffinds that the requested zoning designation, R-40, is harmonious with and in
accordance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and Generalized Land Use
Map, which designates the land to be Mixed Planned Use Development.
Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that
the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new
railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed
in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area;
Surrounding properties include commercial lots north of the site, including D&B,
Schucks Auto Supply, Econo-Lube, and Elm Tree Plaza The property to the east
includes industrial uses~Butte Fence Company and Aire Manufacturing. The
property to the west includes Fountain Park, an approved but not constructed
apartment project. Property to the south is vacant. Staff finds that the requested
zoning designation of R-40 is harmonious with the existing and plauned adjacent
developments with proper buffering of the adjacent industrial uses.
Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to
be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended
character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the
essential character of the same area;
The intended character of the Mixed Planned Development district is to allow for
a variety of residential and commercial projects, including higher densities. Staff
finds that the proposed use~four-plex apartments provides a transition fxom the
Planning & Zoning Con~sion/Mayor & City Council
March 4, 2002
Page 3
existing commercial and industrial uses and is harmonious with the intended
character oftbe area per the Comprehensive Plan.
Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses;
The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony to determine
whether or not the proposed use will be disturbing or hazardous to the
neighboring uses.
Staff does not anticipate that the proposed uses will be hazardous or disturbing to
future or existing neighbors.
Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services
such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the
establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide
adequately any of such services;
Staff finds that the property to be annexed will be served adequately by all
essential public facilities and services, if capacity in existing school facilities is
available and improvements are made by the applicant in accordance with
policies, ordinances and Uniform Codes.
Fn
Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of
the community;
Staff finds that there will not be additional requirements at public cost and that the
annexation and zoning will not be detrimental to the community's economic
welfare.
Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials,
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any
persons, property or the general weffare by reason of excessive production of
traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
Staff finds that the proposed uses will not create excessive traffic, noise or other
nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding
area.
Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so
designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Planning & Zoning Coml~ion/Mayor & City Council
March 4, 2002
Page 4
Staff finds that the proposed use will increase traffic on the surrounding streets,
but the proposed vehicular approaches to the property should not create an
interference with the existing level of traffic. Ada County Highway District's
comments should be considered when making this finding.
Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance; and
Staff finds that no natural or scenic features of major importance will he lost or
damaged by approving the annexation and re-zonc. However, the site does
include the Jackson Drain, which should remain unpiped and improved with a
multiple-use pathway as designated in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of
Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)"
Staff finds that the annexation of this property would add to the City a portion of a
larger enclave of County property that is surrounded by city limits, and would be
in the best interest of the City.
ANNEXATION AND ZONING COMMENTS
The legal description submitted with the application appears to meet the requirements of the
City of Meridian and State Tax Commission and places the parcel contiguous to existing city
limits.
2. The requested zoning of R-40 is compatible with the City Comprehensive Plan.
3. The subject property is within the Urban Service Planning Areo~ Essential City services are
available to the subject property.
Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be
used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation
5. A development agreement will be required as part of this annexation request.
PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS
Sections 12-3-3 J.2 and 12-3-5 D reed as follows: "In determining thc acceptance ora proposed
subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the
following:
a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan;
Planning & Zoning CommiSsion/Mayor & City Council
March 4, 2002
Page 5
Staff finds the subdivision to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development;
Staff finds that public services are readily available to the lots within the proposed
subdivision, provided necessary improvements are made and school capacity is available.
c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement
program;
Staff f'mds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement
funds.
d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development;
Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing
supporting services.
e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the
Commission's attention.
Staff finds that there should not be any other health, safety or environmental problems
associated with this subdivision that may be brought to the Council or Commission's
attention.
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
LAYOUT & OPEN SPACE: Staffdoes not like the visual effect of a long continuous parking
lot fronted continuously by four-plexes with no variation in the setbacks of the building pads and
little visual access into the open space. Originally, staff intended to recommend shffiing lots 12,
13, and 14 to the lot line so that the open space could shffi to the front. This would provide more
accessible and useable open space for the residents of the subdivision and provide some visual
relief fi~m the continuous line of buildings (approximately ~A mile long). However, the fire
department will require emergency access to the front of the buildings. Incorporating an
emergency access into the open space, which is intended to also function as a storm drainage
area, will take some creative design and engineering. Therefore, staff simply raises this issue for
special consideration by the Planning & Zoning Commi.qsion.
STUB STREETS: The proposed plat has only one way in and one way out for the residents of
the subdivision. Residents must go out to Wilson Lane and then to Locust Grove as the only
access to the property. We have already seen the type of"nightmare" that can happen with such
lack of access at the Montvue Subdivision, which only has one access onto Eagle Road.
However, providing additional access to this project is difficult, at best. No stub streets were
provided to the property from the Fountain Park project to the west. No stub streets were
Planning & Zoning CoJsion/Mayor & City Council
March 4, 2002
Page 6
provided from Elliot Industrial Park to the east--however, a gated emergency access is provided
at the south end of the property, connecting to the Aire Manufacturing site. The only potential
stub street would he to the south, which would have to cross the Jackson Drain and Settler's
Canal. This could provide residents access to Pine Street in the future. However, the property to
the south is currently undeveloped and is also designated Mixed Planned Use Development,
which could develop as a mix of commercial and residential uses. Therefore, staff simply raises
this issue for special consideration by the planning & Zoning Commission.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (preliminary, plat)
Sanitary sewer and water service to this site shall be via new main extensions l~om the
existing mains adjacent to the property. Applicant shall be required to abandon the
existing sewer and water stubs, as they are unusable with the project configuration.
The conceptual landscape plan is not in compliance with the requirements of the
Meridian City Landscape Ordinance. Open space areas require a minimum of 1 tree per
8,000 s.f. The trees along the east property line should not be spaced closer than 80% of
the trees' mature width. The proposed spacing appears to he about 40% of the mature
width. Special considexation may he given if the applicant is trying to achieve a solid
visual buffer, but the planting plan should be coordinated with the trees already being
planted along that property line by the adjacent project. Staff recommends vegetative
groandcovers, not bark, adjacent to all storm drain inlets, as bark can clog the drains. A
revised landscape plan shall be submitted 10 days prior to the next public hearing.
Six-foot-tall perimeter fencing shall be installed around the entire project, unless the City
Planning & Zoning Department has agreed in writing that such fencing is not necessary.
Fencing details shall be submitted with the Final Plat application.
Performance specifications for the common area pressurized irrigation system shall be
submitted with the Final Plat application.
All of the required street buffer and open space landscaping shall be installed prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building on any lot created by the
subdivision.
Jackson Drain is designated as a multiple-usc pathway. Applicant shall coordinate
pathway construction requirements with Parks Director, Tom Kuntz. Design shall match
the pathway being constructed as part of Elliot Industrial Park that will eventually
connect through Fountain Park to Locust Grove Apartments and beyond.
GENERAL COMMENTS (preliminary. plat)
Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's final approval letter
for the subdivision name, and the lot and block numbering. Make any corrections
necessary to conform.
Planning & Zoning Court. sion/Mayor & City Council
March 4, 2002
Page 7
2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing,
landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the
final plat.
One-hundred-waR, high-pressure sodium streeffights will be required at locations
designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at
subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
o
All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per
City Ordinance 12-4-13. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans.
Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or iateml
users association, with w~tten confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public
Works Department.
Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Sections 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells
may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation~
STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES
The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each
proposed conditional use in terms of the following and may approve a conditional use permit if
they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-17-3):
That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open
spaces, parking landscaping and other features as may be required by this
ordinance;
Staff finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the requested use
and all other required features, unless visitor parking or additional useable open space is
required.
That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance;
The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the property as "Mixed
Planned Use Development". The proposed high-density residential use is harmonious
with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. The project is being proposed as a
conditional use for a planned development in order to comply with the Comprehensive
Plan designation.
C. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with
Planning & Zoning Cor~sionfMayor & City Council
March 4, 2002
Page $
other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character
of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential
character of the same area;
Staff finds the design concept to be compatible with the intended character of the area,
but would like to consider some modifications, as noted under Other Considerations.
Stafffinds that the proposed use will be harmonious with the intended character of the
area.
That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,
will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity;
Staffdoes not anticipate that the proposed project will have an adverse impact on the
surrounding property; however, the Commission and Council should consider any
testimony given at the public hearings before making this finding.
That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of
proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services;
Staff finds that the proposed development will he adequately served by the essential
public facilities and services listed above, if capacity in existing school facilities is
available and improvements are made by the applicant in accordance with policies,
ordinances and Uniform Codes.
That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public
cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic
welfare of the community;
Staff finds that the proposed use would not he detrimental to the economic welfare of the
comrmmity, nor would it create the need for any new facilities or services to he paid for
by the public.
That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment,
and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or
general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes,
glare or odors;
StatTfinds that no excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors will result fi:om
the proposed use.
That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be
so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
Planning & Zoning Cmr~sion/Mayor & City Council
March 4, 2002
Page 9
Stafffinds that the proposed use will not create significant interference with any traffic
on the surrounding public streets. However, there may be a potential bottle-neck at
Locust Grove Road without another stub street to connect to Pine Street.
That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage ora natural,
scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
Staff does not find that any natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed
by issuance of this conditional use. The Jackson Drain is to remain open and improved
with a pathway.
SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (Conditional Use Permit)
Applicant shall meet all of the requirements of the preliminary plat as a condition of the
Conditional Use Pe-cafit.
Since the applicant is intending to have the ability to sell all of the lots to different
builders, said applicant should address to the Commission regarding the proposed
elevations and what elements are "set in stone" as design standards, for inclusion in the
Development Agreement. A theme for the development must be maintained in order for
the project to be considered a planned development. Existing elevations are acceptable,
and all buildings must substantially comply with the building plans shown. Significant
deviations from the buildings proposed will require a modification to the conditional use
permit.
The landscape plan does not include any trees adjacent to the buildings on the four-plcx
lots. Staff recommends a requirement of at least two trees per building lot as a condition
of the CUP. However, the trees will be the responsibility of the builder at the time of
eonsmJ, ction, prior to occupancy. This should be noted on the revised landscape plan, to
be submitted 10 days prior to the next public hearing.
Two amenities are required as part of a Planned Development. The applicant is
proposing 10% open space and the pathway as their two amenities. Staff questions
whether the proposed open space as currently designed meets the intent of the planned
Development ordinance since it is hidden behind all of the structures, is designed as a
stormwater detention area, has no playground amenities for the residents, and has no
coinmon access.
The application text denotes that approximately 20% open space is provided, but appears
to use all of the space around building pads to arrive at this number. Only common open
areas, exclusive of required buffers, can be used for this calculation. Applicant shall
provide a new corrected calculation for open space that includes only the common areas,
excluding the landscape areas on the individual lots. Slopes must be less than 1:3 per the
Landscape Ordinance.
Planning & Zoning Com~sion/Mayor & City Council
March 4, 2002
Page 10
The proposed dumpster locations interfere with vis~llity for cars backing out of parking
spaces adjacent to the trash enclosures. The layout of these enclosures should be revised
and coordinated with the Sanitary Services Corp. (SSC) before the next public hearing.
Provide an approval letter from SSC with the application for a Certificate of Zoning
Compliance.
No gating of the main access is proposed or approved. Only gating of the emergency
access is allowed. Design requirements i.e., break-away gate, etc.) shall be coordinated
with the fire department.
Proposed parking includes 201 parking spaces, which allows for 2 spaces per unit, plus 6
access~le spaces, plus 19 visitor spaces. The planning & Zolling Commission shall
determine if adequate parking is provided. Parking shell be installed per the approved
plan and meet all dimensional requirements of the city ordinances.
All improvements shall meet all federal requirements of the Americans with Disabilities
Act and the Fair Homing Act.
The Settlers Canal shall be tiled per City Ordinance. However, the Jackson Drain shall
remain open and improved as an amenity to the project with a pathway and associated
landscaping.
10.
All common area landscaping shell be installed prior to the issuance of an occupancy
permit for any home built within the subdivision.
11. The pathway shall be constructed prior to issuance of uny occupancy permit.
12.
Staffdisagrees with the proposed side yard setback (0 feet). Applicant will be required to
meet all building code and fire code requirements.
COMPRE~IENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
The subject property is located in an area designated as Mixed Planned Use Development in the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan. The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and
policies that are relevant to this application. Staff has selected the following sections that moa
directly apply to the proposed project.
Goals Section
Goal 4: To provide homing oppommities for all economic groups within the community.
Goal 8: To establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative end
functional site design.
Economic Development Chenter
3.1U - Approve quality housing projects that meet the needs of all economic levels.
3.2U - Encourage efforts to develop and maintain quality neighborhoods and housing...
Planning & Zoning Com~l~sionfMayor & City Council
March 4, 2002
Page 11
Land Use Chanter
2.1U - Support a variety of residential categories for the purpose of pwviding the City with a
range of affordable housing opportunities.
Transportation Chapter
1.19U - Encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and
tranquility.
1.14 - Design and performance standards should be applied to infilling development in order to
reduce adverse impacts upon existing adjacent developmem.
1.19 - High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or
other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares.
Community Design Chapter
6.2U - Pedestrian access connectors will be required in all new development to link subdivisions
together to promote neighborhood identity.
6.11U - Promote well-planncd and well-designed affordable housing in all Meridian
neighborhoods.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff supports the concept of developing this area with a high-density residential use, as
proposed by the applicant. However, the following issues must be resolved prior to making a
recommendation:
O~en ~pace:
· Amount of open space (new calculation)
· access to the open space
slopes and trees within the open space
amenities, i.e. "tot lot" playground, etc.
2. Stub Street: Determine whether or not a stub street is needed to the south.
3. Trash Enclosures: Resolve the conflict of visibility for parking spaces adjacent to the
trash enclosures.
4. Landscape Plan: Submit a revised landscape plan in compliance with ordinance
standards.
Upon resolution of the above issues, staffrecommends approval of this project with the
conditions noted in this report.
lre
Joseph Silva
Deputy Chief
Meridian Fire Department
540 E. Franklin Rd.
Meridian, ld 83642
(208) 888-1234
: Fax (208)895-0~390
February 19, 2002
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission~,~
Joseph Silva, Deputy Chief, Fire Pravention ~
Cooper Subdivision File # AZ 02-002
RECEIVED
FEB 2 0 2002
C_ity Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
The following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimum levels of fire protection for
the proposed project:
1. ,That a fire-flow of 1,000 gallons per minute shall be available for duration of 2 hours to service
the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart. 1997 UFC Appendix IILA
2. OPerational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are requked before
combustible constxuction beg/ns. UFC 901.4.2 & 901.3
3. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water Department.
4. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department.
5. All internal roads shall have a minimum radius of 28' inside and 48' outside radius.
6. The roadways shall be built to Ada County Highway Standards. UFC 902.2.1
7. The propose~:l, subdivision with an estimated 2,8 residents per household would have
undetermined population at build out. According to a report completed by Fire & Emergency Services
Consulting Group in February of 2000 our requests for service are projected to reach 2800 in the year
2005 and 3800 by the year 2010, th/s is up fi.om 2069 responses in the year 2000.
8. An approved temporary mm-around is required for any dead-ends over 150'.
9, The project will be required to have an approved means of accessing a public road. See attached
sketch.
Nov 20 O1 03:31p
LOT 2
Toothman~Orton En~r~.
Co. 208-323-2399
p.2
$5' \
, s~($")-- ', .®
?
-iRR
.14'
/ 66.19
/
, 6"SS
.. SD(
75.00
MAYOR
Robert D. Come
CITY COUNC1L MEMBERS
Ron Anderson
Keith Bird
Tammy deWeerd
Chede McCandless
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 · Fax (208) 8874813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 · Fax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILD[NG DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 · Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 · Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meddian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: Februa~ 28, 2002
Transmittal Date: January tt, 2002 Hearing Date: March ?j 2002
File No.: ~ 02-002
Request: Annexation and Zoning of 5,81 acres from RUT to R-40 zones for proposed
Cooper Canyon Subdivision
By: Wildwood Development, LLC
Location of Pmparty or Project: east of North Locust Grove Road and south of East Wilson Lane
David Zaremba, P/Z (No v,~, vac,
Jerry Centers, PIZ (No VaR, VAC, F~')
PIZ (Ne VAR, VAC, FP)
Keven Shreeve, P/Z ,No VAR, VAC, FP)
Keith Bomp, P/Z (Ne VAR, VAC.
Robert Corrie, Mayor
Ron Anderson, CIC
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Cherle McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service {No VAR, VAC,
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Your Concise Remarks:
Meridian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FP/V~ onty)
Ada County Highway District
Community Planning Assoc.
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. 0:P,'~P or~y)
U.S. West O:t~/Ppenty)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PPoniy)
Bureau of Reclamation (FP..~Poniy)
Idaho Transportation Department (NoFP)
Ada County (Annexaffon only)
RECEIVED
JAN 1 5 2002
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Ron Anderson
Keith Bird
Tammy deWeerd
Cherie McCandless
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-,M.33 · Fax (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 · Fax 288-250l
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 · Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 · Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Cororoission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by:
Transmittal Date: January 11, 2002
File No.: AZ 02-002
Request:
February 28, 2002
Hearing Date: March 7, 2002
Annexation and Zoning of 5.81 acres from RUT to R-40 zones for proposed
By:
Location of Property or Project:
Cooper Canyon Subdivision
Wildwood Development, LLC
east of North Locust Grove Road and south of East Wilson Lane
David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC,
Jerry Centem, P/Z (No VAR, VAC,
P/Z (No VAR, vAc, FP)
Keven Shreeve, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Keith Borop, PIZ (No VAR, VAC,
Robert Corrie, Mayor
Ron Anderson, C/C
Tammy deWeerd, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Cherie McCandless, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Departroent
Sanitary Service (No VAR, vAc,
Building Departroent
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Meridian School District (Nor-P)
Meridian Post Office
Ada County Highway District
Community Planning Assoc.
Central District Health
Nampa Meddian Irrig. Distdct
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co.
U.S. West (FP,*PPonly)
Intermountaln Gas (FP/PPonly)
Bureau of Reclamation (~P/s~ or/y)
Idaho Transportation Department (No r*~)
~ County (Annexation ordy)
Your Concise Remarks:
v
RECEIVED
FEB 2 5 2002
City of Meridi.an
City Clerk Off~ce
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Ron Anderson
Keith Bird
Taramy deWeerd
Cberie McCandless
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live I
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO ;
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 · Fax (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 · Fax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 · Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 * Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTALS T° AGENCIES FOR COMMENTSi ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
:WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Cororoission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meddian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: Februar~ 28, 2002
Transmittal Date:
File No.:
Request:
January tl,2002! Hearing Datg: March 7, 2002
AZ 02-002 , I
By:
Location of Property or Project:
Annexation and Zonin~l of 5.8t acres from RUT to R.40 zones for proposed
Cooper Canyon Subdivision
Wildwood Development, LLC
east of North Locust Grove Road and south of East Wilson Lane
' I
David Zaremba, PIZ (No van, VA¢. FP) I Meddian School District (No
Jerry Centers, P/Z (NoVAn. VAO, F-P) ~ i Meridlan Post Office (,(FP,~Poniy)
PiZ (No VAR, VAC, PP) I Ada County Highway District
Keven 8hreeve, PIZ (No van. vAc, FP) Community Planning Assoc.
Keith Borop, P/Z (Ne VAR, VAC, FP) Central District Health
Robert:CoMe, Mayor I Nampa Meridian trig D strict
Ron Andemon, C/C I Satflem Irrigation Distdct
Tammy deWeerd, C/C I Idaho Power C0. ,.................~P~Pp
KsIth Bird, C/C I U.S. W~'t (FPIPponly)
, Cherie McCandless. C/C Intennountain Gas O=P.,PPenly)
Water Department ---~"~-- Bureau of Reciaroation (rP~t, onty)
Sewer Department I Idaho Transportation Department (No
Sanitary Setvlns (No VAn.! VAt., F-P) I Ada County (Annexa~n,~y)
Building Department Your Concise Remarks:
Fire Department r ~
Police Department
City Attorney ~* I
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
RECEIVED
JAN 1 5 2002
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office