HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 11-30 PreCITY OF MERIDIAN
PRE -COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
Roll -call Attendance:
X Shaun Wardle X Christine Donnell
X Charlie Rountree O Keith Bird
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve as Amended
3. Space Study Update by ZGA: Mike Simmonds S Cathy Sewell
4. Executive Session per Idaho State Code 67-2346(t)(b): Delete
*Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on
discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only.
Meridian City Pre-Councll Agenda — November 30, 2004 Page t of 7
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings
please contact the City Clerk's Woe at 888.4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting November 30. 2004
The Meridian City Pre -Council meeting was called to order at 6:05 P.M. on
Tuesday, November 30, 2004 by Mayor Tammy de Weerd.
Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Shaun Wardle, Christine Donnell
and Charlie Rountree.
Members Absent: Keith Bird
Others Present: Brad Watson, Bill Nichols and Will Berg.
Item 1. Roll -call Attendance:
0 Keith Bird X Christine Donnell
X Shaun Wardle X Charlie Rountree
X Mayor Tammy de Weerd
Item 2. Adoption of the Agenda:
Rountree: The next item on our agenda is the adoption of the agenda and I will
point out that I believe the Executive Session was being requested by
Councilman Bird. Is that correct, Mayor?
De Weerd: It was requested by myself and because Councilman Bird isn't here, I
don't think it's appropriate, so —
Rountree: Okay, I would entertain a motion on the agenda, noting that.
Wardle: Mr. Vice President.
Rountree: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: I move that we adopt the agenda with the deletion of Item No. 4.
Donnell: I second that.
Rountree: All those in favor. Opposed? I think it passed.
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
Item 3. Space Study Update by ZGA:
Rountree: Mike. Simmonds are you going to do the update? Would you like to sit
there with the mic? I know you have got a problem with your back? Anything we
can do to help.
Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting
November 30, 2004
Page 2 of 10
Simmonds: Thank you, I appreciate that. As long as I am standing I am okay.
Mayor De Weerd, Vice President Rountree, members of the Council. I
appreciate the opportunity to review the update of the program space needs
analysis with you. It's been an interesting journey to get through the various
changes that have happened through the city and be able to work with everybody
to try and stay abreast of those and stay updated with all of the things that are
happening with the city. We started in 1998, 1 believe, the first space study was
submitted. I just wanted to go through just a brief history and since that time a lot
of things happen, a lot of things took place, the city continued to grow, services
increased, infrastructure changed and then the Mayor and Council requested that
we go back and revisit that original program document to review with all of the
departments, the changes that have happened in their various departments since
we did the first program study, which we have done. The latest program that you
have as dated October le is kind of a combination of those efforts. We visited
all the various departments and looked at what they have for space and the
number of staff they have and what they perceived their growth needs will be in
the future and I want to walk briefly through the general contents of that program
documented and then I am going to have Kathy Sewell from our office who is the
project architect on this project with me and kind of go through some of the
specifics of those findings; not in too great detail because I know you have other
things on the agenda, but the program document really consists of four different
parts. There was a departmental review and space analysis that goes
department by department, makes an attempt to list all of the personnel and the
resources needed for those areas. That was updated and then there was the
overall space analysis in conjunction with a preliminary project budget and the
purpose of that was to try and determine what an overall budget would be in
terms of a target number. Obviously, there is not enough detail in the report at
this time to go through bolt by bolt, beam by beam and be able to tell you exactly
what that cost will be. The nature of the program of the document itself is fluid
and it will continue to change over time as the city hall facility becomes a little bit
clear in terms of its scope and moves through a design process and ultimately
construction and occupancy. The program will evolve with that and so the
program as you see today is really kind of a snapshot in time and as the study
moves forward there will be more things identified that have not been identified to
date. That being kind of the nature of the design process. So, we expect that to
happen, but the effort to determine the overall area and project budget, I think
gives everybody a starting place and a target to look at. I believe we have
identified in the neighborhood of 50,000 square feet as an ultimate build out for
the year 2025. Right now, if we were to identify a number for accommodating all
the city's agencies and needs at this point, excluding any county uses excluding
future storage growth and those kinds of things would be in the neighborhood of
22,000 feet as of this last year 2004. It's projected that that space need would
increase to 37,000 feet in 2005 at the end of 2005. So, by 2025, the number —
that 50,000 square foot number includes 5,000 square feet of ACHD — I am
sorry, of DMV space for Ada County and it includes some storage space for
Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting
November 30, 2004
Page 3 of 10
archives in that which will evolve. That number still is a little fluid at this point, but
as things will change in that and uses will change and some positions may be
moved or shifted or re-identified, we thing that that number is a good target
number at this point to look at. In addition to that there is in the back you will see
there are four different scenarios that's sort of an attempt to identify what the
project looks like in terms of the budget amount. If it's a one story building, if it's
a two story building, if it's a three story building and how much site area that
would involve and then there is some associated budget numbers that
accompany those different scenarios. With that I think I would like to turn it over
to Cathy, unless you have any questions so far. Cathy can go through some of
those program numbers in a little bit more detail.
Rountree: Any questions? Thank you, Mike.
Sewell: Madame Mayor, members of the Council, thank you. Right now I am
just going to focus on, I believe, it's section four which deals with the needs
aspect and that really gets into the bulk of where the numbers came from
meeting with the departments and that and I guess just a couple things that we
have learned over the past couple of months. There have been some changes
at the city. The city attorney is now in there and we included some of those
numbers in there. We also had conversations with the county, the DMV in
particular. Right now they are leasing a space. I think at that space their lease is
three years and so I think from what I got from the counties that the timing of the
new city hall facility and what kind of moves they want to make will need to
worked through and I think we can even kind of address that. Also, having some
conversations with Lila Hill with the Historical Society and what to do with that
group. I think that (inaudible) request came from Keith Bird to make some
inquiries into the Historical Society and see where they are going and what Lila
indicated was initially we had about 800 square feet for them which would include
some display area and some space for patrons to come in and do some
research. But, I think really she felt that their needs are beyond that to display all
their archival material and that would really require a much larger space, but she
did think that the 800 square feet that we have in here could work for other
historical groups within the city. Maybe there is some initial display, changes out
or something, but that space could be used if the city did want to have that type
of function in there. But, as Mike kind of started to go through where we are now
2004 existing indicates right around 24,000 — 21,000 and, like you said that is
without the county and then projecting to 2005 around 37,000. 1 think most of the
departments we have tried to update those from — in short term, I think Will has
given us some additional information over the past couple of months and I think
our thought here is that there is enough information here that any other changes,
if there are not too significant can probably be picked up in the next phase of
schematic design. So, I can move through these or if you have any questions or
if you have already taken a look at these or if you want me to just talk about it a
little bit more.
Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting
November 30, 2004
Page 4 of 10
Rountree: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: I have a specific question just from- a department and the Parks
Department. The Park's director and 1 in the past have talked about a couple of
things and one of those was the and I heard you bring up the Historical Society,
which reminded me of it. Was the need to have some flexible space for some of
the groups that we partner with, some of the sports organizations, which may
need to use it for some office space within the hours of 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
when they do signups and have a central location. I don't see that reflected
within the study here. Was that taken into consideration?
Sewell: That was and I think when — if you look at the — maybe it's the last page
under public lobby and support there was always maybe this need for a larger
multi-purpose room of about 1,000 square feet and I think that comes from some
of the need that was taken up with the church next door, some larger gatherings
and so right now we had projected 1,000 square foot facility that may be used for
those types of functions. So, that is in there and I think as far as how all this
plays out as far as the foot print, one story, four story, I think where that space
lies will need to be addressed as the project moves into schematic, we show a
space adjacency diagram in the back here, which is just strictly looking at it from
laying it out who needs to be dose to who, but it doesn't really show any kind of a
multi level adjacency. One study that ZCA did back in 1999 was a development
of a multi municipal center, which started to show, I believe, a three-story facility
in breaking up the various departments. So, there is an example of another
adjacency diagram, if you will to look into that, but that space is in there and we
could (inaudible) —
Wardle: Mr. Vice President to follow up a question to that. You mentioned
adjacency and one of the other things that 1 have heard is the need for
departments which have direct interaction with the public such as billing services,
Parks Department fees, Planning and Zoning fees and the need to have at least
some portion of that on the first floor to be able to service those residents that
need to interact to that. Has that been addressed? I have heard a couple of
thoughts, one of them being a satellite billing• office or a central billing office,
which takes care of all of that or different departments with the satellite office on
the first floor to take care of those functions. Has that been thought out a little bit
further?
Sewell: I think it's been acknowledged that those are real walk in traffic type
functions and discussions with DMV. I think they strongly suggested we are a
first floor function and I think that will kind of get back into the site of the new
facilities is very important and what functions can be placed on that first floor and
make it work. It sounds that the way the Building Department's functioning right
now is great. People can walk in off the street, get in and out and move on
without having to go up and down too much. I think it is certainly something that
Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting
November 30, 2004
Page 5 of 10
will be addressed in that schematic phase, identify the site and move through
there.
Simmonds: Councilman Wardle what is kind of a follow up in that study that was
done previously, just the conceptual design for the three story building there was
some discussion about different departments and their need to have a link on the
first floor of the ground floor and one of the fun discussions we always have
when we get into more than one floor is that everybody wants to be on the same
floor. Either that's the third floor, second floor, first floor or one of those floors so
you end up with 100,000 square feet on one floor and no feet on the other floor.
Part of the discussion about that had to do with the link that all the department's
need to have on the main floor, convenient access to the public. I think that's
really an important issue that needs to be followed up again in the schematic
process. But, there were some billing components to, i believe, Planning and
Zoning and fees and those kinds of things there was some discussion about, do
we mix and mingle some of those things on the first floor. How do we do that?
So, it's a very good question.
Wardle: I guess a follow up question to that — more organizationally, so if the
Mayor can speak to this. Are we thinking — I see lobby in here. Are we thinking
of a central lobby and reception area and if so, which department would staff that
or would it be a combination?
De Weerd: Mr. Chairman the — I guess the lobby area would just be open. No
one would staff it. I think Councilman Wardle — you know, it would make sense
to have the most public facilities down there, but again it will go back to the
design of the building itself and how you start plugging in the spatial needs to a
design.
Donnell: Mr. Vic President. I apologize for not reviewing this very carefully, but I
didn't. Its sitting there. If I had looked to see that that's what's on the Pre -
Council, I might have spent a little bit more time on it, but was there some
discussion in regard to training area? Either in combination with Human
Resources where you have to do perhaps any kind of training, sexual
harassment in the work place and those kinds of things. Was there some
discussion of that?
Sewell: In our interviews with the Human Resources Department that didn't
come up but in intervi8ews with the IT Department, the Finance Department,
there were some larger spaces identified for training or meeting and that so I
think that is certainly something that could be added to the program, I think that
we also found that there probably some duplication of spaces and that perhaps
could be one that we look at and find out what the requirements are for a space
like that and get that worked in.
Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting
November 30, 2004
Page 6 of 10
Donnell: Mr. Vice President just a follow up comment and I was thinking the
same thing that it certainly could be multi -use space. It doesn't appear that it
would be appropriate space in a multi-purpose room, but in an area where larger
numbers of people could be brought together for any type of training. It could be
from the Police Department, even though they have a nice meeting room that
could be just any part of the city structure.
Simmonds: Vice President Rountree and Councilmember Donnell just as a
follow up to that there was also some discussion regarding the sharing of space
and the efficiencies of space as depending on the number of floors and how
different departments are organized and the adjacencies and the kind of the
public lobby support space makes an attempt to identify some of that space.
Don't believe some of that space has really been assigned yet, but there were a
number of discussions that took place in several departments about training and
that sort of thing. There was also some discussion that had to do with the need
for kind of a quasi or public auditorium in the downtown area and in the
discussion of is that food service? Does it include food service, does it not? Is it
a kitchen? How big is it? - I think some of those questions still need to be
answered more specifically. For the short term it seemed like the direction was
that as a part of the city hall building a space like that would probably be a large
meeting room assembly area, but probably would not include food service and
that sort of thing. So, I think some of that is still revolving, but I think that the
need for training space is something that is only going to grow.
Donnell: Mr. Vice President.
Rountree: Go ahead.
Donnell: One more comment. Having been involved in a lot of program planning
in the past, when you visit with departments generally you will hear the greatest
wishes. You know, it's always we want more and more and more and at some
point then you begin to look at how can we really make this happen and stay
within any kind of reasonable budget? So, combining spaces that could be used
by more than one department is certainly a good plan. Then also considering
that always what it is that every department wants isn't always what happens in
the end. You all know where I am going with this, don't you? It's just that
architects love to meet the needs of all departments for all teachers or all of
everybody and so you know if they are given that kind of latitude and it can grow
and grow and grow it's just a caution that you probably don't need at all.
De Weerd: Mr. Vice President.
Rountree: Madame Mayor. I believe Mike had a response for that --
De Weerd: I just also wanted to note to Councilmember Donnell we are looking
at modular type of areas too, so the workspace can be flexible. In building for the
Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting
November 30, 2004
Page 7 of 10
future, I think, it will leave us a lot of room to lease out, get additional partners in
as we have that future space to grow. So, I guess they do have room to kind of
dream bigger, but I think we have already cut out several pieces that we didn't
think we would ever be at.
Donnell: Excuse me, Mr. Vice President just one more comment and then 1 will
be quiet. You talked about food service. You talked about perhaps some kind of
and I am assuming you are talking about catering or a place that food can be set
up or a sink that's available in a large meeting room and I assume that you have
also thought about that. You know, just a place where coffee pots can be
plugged in and you know those kinds of things that we seem to forget
sometimes.
Simmonds: Vice President Rountree, Councilmember Donnell. Excellent
comment about architects wanting to solve everybody's problems because the
one person that is not happy is the one person that calls us after everything is
finished a lot. You are absolutely right and I think what we are try and do in the
program phase is to balance what we are hearing from departments with what
may be practical in terms of the budget. There are kind of three legs to that stool
it seems like, that wants and the desires and then there is how much is available
in terms of resources and then what the various management organizations, part
of those departments think are realistic and so I think with guidance from the
Mayor and others we have tried to kind of balance this a little bit to say that we
probably got it all perfect would not be accurate. In response to the food service
question, most conference rooms, conference spaces, we envision would
probably have some kind of minor plumbing, sinks, cabinetry and that sort of
thing. I think the big question about food service that we were thinking about or
discussing had to do with large groups of 200 plus people that are there for a
workshop. How do you feed them? Do you cook food onsite? What if the Boy
Scouts want to have a special event in the evening? Are they there? Do they
cook it themselves? What do you do with 500 hotdogs? Do you cook them there
or what do you do? So, I just think some of those things still need to be
answered and may be in conjunction with other facilities downtown that work in
concert with this, which needs to be coordinated. So, I don't know if that really
answers your question very well.
Donnell: It does indeed. Thank you.
Rountree: Any other questions?
De Weerd: Mr. Vice President.
Rountree: I just want one more thing. As you both worked with Nampa and
Boise to kind of look at their staffing currently and to (inaudible) when we are at
those different population sizes, so we had a better idea on that too.
Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting
November 30, 2004
Page 8 of 10
Simmonds: Madame Mayor, Vice President Rountree that is correct and there
were some departments that I think nobody had a real good idea of what that
meant in five years or ten years or what that was and sometimes we can scare
ourselves pretty badly. So, we were able to talk to some other Nampa and Boise
City and at least get an idea of what their benchmark might be in a couple of
cases. So, with any luck we are dose to the target.
Donnell: I promise you that I will go back and review the document. The one
dated October 15'h is that the one I have at home? That's the one I have got at
home. Okay.
Simmonds: And we would encourage anybody that has any comments after the
fact — as we said this document is fluid. There really is no such thing as a final
program document until the building is built. So, if anybody has any other
comments or concerns, please let us know any time and we will find some way to
amend this or note it for the record or something, so it's addressed.
Donnell: Mr. Vice President we don't want change orders? No change orders?
Rountree: I will second that motion.
Wardle: Mr. Vice President a two-part question. One, are the parking numbers
that we are seeing here use related for employees and my second question, I
don't see on here, but where does our use fall under our city's (inaudible ---)?
Simmonds: Vice President Rountree, Councilman Wardle the parking count I
believe that is required by city ordinance was 100 parking stalls and we didn't
feel that was enough parking for a facility of this size. I am not sure that the city
has anything downtown at this point that is this type of a use that would be of
similar demands. So, based on what we think we know about civic functions and
city growth, we doubled it to 200 and that's as scientific as we got. We could
share all kinds of formulas with you, but in the end that's what we did.
Rountree: Any further questions? Bill? Will?
Berg: Mr. Vice President I just have a couple of comments. Parking was a big
issue and I know we have talked about that especially if we have Motor Vehicles
in our building. They attract a lot of traffic and parking. If you want to, we do
have some plans from 1997 that incorporated a lot of ideas and I think the
problem that we have is hard to visualize how you incorporate a three story
building to meet everybody's little needs or niches or connections. We had back
stairways, connecting to other departments so that we could communicate
because we couldn't be on the same floor. We had a little break centers and
things of that nature and a lot less conference rooms because we are combining
the needs. But, it's hard to visualize it just in that document because you try to
Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting
November 90, 2004
Page 9 of 10
sit there and you try to think of how does this lay out and we don't know yet. The
site will determine a lot of those questions and that's been a bigger question.
Rountree: Thanks, Will.
Nary: Mr. Vice President
Rountree: Mr. Nary.
Nary: The only other comment I guess I would have is I think on the — I guess to
balance Councilmember Donnell's concern about everybody's wish list, I think in
looking at the staffing needs, I think that is the hardest one for most of the
departments to put a finger on when you are looking at 20 years' growth and
where we have been in the last ten, it's really hard to envision on that so I think
that's the part probably for me — although I am willing to combine all the legal and
HR functions and sharing the space, I'm good with that. I think some of the other
ones aren't quite as conducive to being able to do that. So, I think that maybe at
their next director's meeting we can have that discussion as well about how this
document fits into what at least the different department directors vision as to
how long term it looks. You know, because for my department and combining
the two it does give me a little bit more room than maybe Mr. Watson's or the
Park's Director or someone else who may think they may have a need for staffing
that's maybe sooner than 2025, but I think we just haven't got there yet.
Rountree: Thank you, Bill. Madame Mayor
De Weerd: We will be meeting on this next week during our director's meeting
so we will have that discussion again and hopefully we will get it all done before
we get another person up here. We keep changing faces and we get new
insight. We just want to start construction.
Donnell: You notice they are all looking at me with their comments.
Rountree: Any other comments? Brad, do you have anything to offer or Chief?
Watson: Not right now.
Rountree: Thank you Mike and Cathy for the presentation. If you have any
additional comments we welcome you.
Simmonds: Just one closing comment that we have neglected to mention on the
kind of the growth model for city govemments. What we found is that it doesn't
tend to be a straight line in terms of the number of service staff needed to serve
the community in the jump from zero to fifty. It's not nearly as large a number
from 50 to 100,000, but it seems to be — I am not using the right term, but
inversely expediential because it doesn't go the direction you would think it
Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting
November 30, 2004
Page 10 of 110
would. If it takes 20 people in a department to handle a city of 50,000 it may only
take 8 to 10 more to handle double that population just because of the
infrastructure that's already in place. So, that's another little curve in this
analysis as you were saying, Mr. Nary, when you are talking department heads
and they are trying to forecast what they are going to need and some of that, of
course, is directly related to the rate of growth of the city. We try to take some of
those things into consideration when we talk with the different departments about
that.
Rountree: Anything else? Thank you. We have no more items on our agenda.
Wardle: Mr. Vice President.
Rountree: Mr. Wardle.
Wardle: Seeing no more items on the agenda, I move that we adjourn.
Donnell: Second.
Rountree: All those in favor. Opposed? We are in adjournment until 7:00 p.m.
ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:35 P.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
APPROVED:
TAMMY DERD, MAYOR
ATTESTED:
12- Z/i'94--
DATE APPRGtIEO'u
O
BEIk a