Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRaymond Estates RZ RZ 04-012 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING APPLICANT Ronald Van Auker November 18, 2004 ITEM NO. 8 REQUEST Public Hearing: Rezone of 3.74 acres from I-L & C-G zones to all C-G zone for Raymond Estates - NEC of East Franklin Road and North Gaudians Avenue CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY See attached staff comments COMMENTS /å t-IJ mlJW1--11 ~ 4J D/7lj j)Z Jf-D AGENCY CITY CLERK; CITY ENGINEER: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEfT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: No comment No comment MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: See attached comments No comment NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: No comment IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: L~ A~ ~ttached R~sed Site Plan ~ C~--'~) ~ Ph~ 2 Emailed: . '~Q e \/C/Ito.J(>-tM..v (n Initials: ~........--- MGIe~al. pre.ented at public: meefll18S shelH become property 01 the City 01 e~ an. -7qo¡~ MAYOR Tammy de Weerd CITY COUNCIL MEMBERB Keith Bird Christine DotmoU Shaun Wardle CharI.. M. R..-.. Æ olf erldi!t, IDAHO CITY HALL (208) 888-4433 - Fax 887-4813 PUBUCWORKS BUlilllNG DEPARTMENT (208) 887.221l-Fax 898-9551 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 888-4433 - FAX 887-4813 STAFF REPORT: P&Z Hearing Date: November 18, 2004 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission From: Sonya Allen, Assistant City Planner ð~ Subject: Raymond Estates Subdivision Request to Rezone 3.74 Acres from I-L and CoG Zones to Entirely CoG Zone, by Ronald W. Van Auker (File No. RZ-O4-0J 2) We have reviewed the above-mentioned submittal and offer the following comments. as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full. unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, Ronald W. Van Auker, has requested a rezone of3.74 acres from I-L (Light Industrial) and CoG (General Retail and Service Commercial) to entirely CoG zone. The subject property was approved for a lot-split by City Council on October 5, 2004 to split off this portion from a 40-acre parcel. The applicant was required to go through the Lot line Adjustment process and submit a record of survey for approval by the City Engineer. The Record of Survey was recorded on October 13, 2004 for the split (Inst. No. 104130608). The resulting 3.74 acres parcel is currently split zoned CoG and I-L. The applicant proposes to rezone the I-L portion to C-Gto match the existing zoning of the portion fronting E. Franklin Road. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates this property as a mix of commercial and industrial uses as currently zoned. The current zoning and the designation shown on the future land use map for this property does not follow lot lines. For this reason, the Planning Director has not required the applicant to submit a Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. A conceptual site plan has been submitted by the applicant for the future development of this site. Access to the site will be provided via Gaudians Avenue. Due to the commercial development to the west (RC. Willey), the existing commercial zoning of the portion of the subject parcel fronting Franklin Road and also the property to the east, and the Mayor, Counci~ and P&Z Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2004 Page 2 commercial designation in the Comprehensive Plan for this area, the applicant's request to rezone the property to entirely CoG zoning is compatible with the desired land uses for that area. It appears that the legal description submitted with the application for the rezone is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and the State Tax Commission. If the property is rezoned to CoG, the subject lot would conform to the minimum lot size and minimum frontage requirements of the zone. Staff is recommending approval of the subject rezone request to CoG, with the comments and conditions stated in this report. LOCATION The subject property is located on the north side ofE. Franklin Road, approximately ',{¡ mile east ofN. Eagle Road, in T.3N., R.lE., Section 9. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North - I-L zoned property South - Franklin Road, Touchmark Living Center, zoned L-O, Montvue Subdivision, zoned Rl East - Commercial and Industria1 zoned property West - R. C. Willey, zoned CoG OWNER OF RECORD The property owner of record is Ronald W. Van Auker, who has provided consent for the subject application. ANNEXATION & ZONING ANALYSIS According to Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment." The following is the list of standards found in 11-15-11 and analysis by staff: A. Will the new zoniug be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there beeu an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment; The 2002 Comprehensive Piau Future Land Use Map designates a portion of the subject property adjacent to E. Franklin Road as "Commercial" and the northern portion of the parcel Mayor, Council, and P&Z Commission Hearing Date: November 18,2004 Page 3 "Industria1," as the property is currently zoned. An application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment has not been submitted. Staff finds the following Goals, Objectives, and Action items contained in the 2002 Comprehensive Plan to be applicable to this application (sÚlff analysis is in iÚllics below policy): . "Locate new community commercial areas on arterials or collectors near residential areas in such a way as to complement with adjoining residential areas." (Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective B, Action item 5) The subject property has frontage on E. Franklin Road, a principal arterial roadway. SÚlff believes that the commercial development of this property will compliment the existing residential uses/structures in the area if designed properly. . "Require appropriate landscape and buffers along transportation corridors (setback, vegetation, low walls, berms, etc.)." (Chapter VD, Goal IV, Objective D, Action item 4) An appropriate landscape buffer along E. Franklin}Wad will be required by the City when an application for a CZC is submitted . "Require all commercial businesses to install and maintain landscaping." (Chapter V, Goal Ill, Objective D, Action item 5) The applicant is oot specifically proposing to install any landscaping with the subject reZOlW application. Staff is including a condition requiring the applicant to submit for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) which, when processed, will require the applicant to construct landscaping along E. Franklin Road and the perimeter of the site. B. Is the area included in the zoning amendmeut intended to be rezoned in the future: Staff does not anticipate that the applicant intends to rezone the subject property in the future. c. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in tbe fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning - for example, a resideutial area turning into commercial area by means of conditional use permits; The subject property will be developed as a retail use, which is consistent with the requested C- G zoning. Retail uses are permitted in the CoG zone according tp MCC 11-8-1. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) is required for construction of a new building on the site. D. Has there been a change in the area or adjaceut areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area; Mayor, Council, and P&Z Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2004 Page 4 The general vicinity of this property is changing rapidly. Just west of the property, Franklin Road is in the process of being widened to five lanes from Main Street to N. Eagle Road. Franklin Road to Cloverdale Road is also in ACHD's five-year work plan to be widened. Due to increasing traffic volumes on E. Franklin Road, staff believes that the use of this property for commercial purposes is the best use of the land. The property to the west (RC. Willey), the subject property, and the property directly to the east fronting E. Franklin Road are all zoned CoG. The property across the street, zoned L-O (Limited Office), is in the process of being developed as a large senior living community (Meadowlake Village). This portion ofE. Franklin Road on which the property fronts, is also an entryway corridor into the City. A portion of the subject property is currently zoned C-G. This request is for an extension of the CoG zone to the north. Staff finds that rezoning this site to CoG is consistent with other land uses and changes in the area. E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maiutained to be harmonious aud appropriate in appearance with the existing or inteuded character of the general vichlity and that such use will uot change the essential character of the same area; The applicant is proposing a future retail use, but is not proposing a building design with this application. Staff fmds that the anticipated retail use if designed, constructed, and operated in accordance with adopted city ordinances, through a future CZC application, should be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the vicinity. F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; Staff finds that the use of this site for retail sales purposes should not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses if all development and landscaping ordinances are complied with. The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony to determine whether the proposed extension of the current CoG zoning will be disturbing or hazardous to the neighboring properties. G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protectiou, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person respousibJe for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any ofsucb services; All essential public facilities and City services listed above are available to this site. Staff finds that the current configuration of Franklin Road and the anticipated road widening should be adequate to serve this site in the future. Mayor, Council, and P&Z Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2004 Page 5 The Commission and Council should reference any written or verbal testimony submitted by the Meridian Police Department, the Meridian Fire Department, and any other agency providing service to this site, regarding their ability to adequately service this project. Staff finds that the property proposed for rezoue can be served adequately by all essential public facilities and services. H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities aud services and will not be detrimental to the ecouomic welfare of the community; Staff finds that changing the zoning on the northern portion of this property to CoG will not cause excessive additional requirements at public cost. Other required site improvements win be funded and constructed by the developer through the CZC process. Staff also finds that the rezoning of this portion of the property will not be detrimental to the community's economic welfare. L Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipmeut and conditions of operatiou that will be detrimental to any persous, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of tratTIc, uoise, smoke, fumes, glare or odon; The applicant is proposing this property be used for retail sales in the future. Staff finds that a retail type use win create additional traffic on adjacent arterial roads. Further, the parking and maneuvering of cars on the site may generate additional noise for surrounding properties. However, staff does not believe that the additional noise should be excessive. Staff does not anticipate a retail use will creste excessive smoke, fumes, glare, or odors that will be detrimental to any person, property or the general welfare of the area. To ensure this finding, an future uses on this site will be required to go through the Certificate of Zoning Compliance process and will be subject to compliance with City Code. J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an inteñereuce with traffic on surrounding public streets; Per a conceptual development plan submitted by the applicant, vehicular access to this site will be provided ftom Gaudians Avenue. All future vehicular access points to this site should comply with ACHD policies. If a vehicular approach is approved to the site that is designed and constructed in accordance with ACHD policies, staff fmds that the approach(es) will not create an interference with traffic on the surrounding public street(s). Please review any comments ftom ACHD for additional information regarding this finding. K. Will uot result in the destmction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and Staff is not aware of any natura1 or scenic feature(s) that would be lost, damaged or destroyed by allowing this site to be rezoned and developed with commercial uses. Any existing trees larger than 4" caliper that are removed shall be mitigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance. RZ-04-012 Roymond Estatoo RZ.doc Mayor, Council, and P&Z Commission Hearing Date: November 18, 2004 Page 6 L. Is the proposed zoning ameudment in the best interest of the City of Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992)" For the reasons listed in the findings above, staff finds that the rezoning of this property would be in the best interest of the City. REZONE SITE-SPECIFIC COMMENTS 1. The submitted legal description appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission and will place the parcel contiguous to existing city limits. 2. The subject property is within the Urban Services Planning Area. 3. All future development of the subject property shall be constructed in accordance with City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. 4. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) application shall be submitted for approval for construction of any new building on the site. It is anticipated that future development will be consistent with the conceptual site plan submitted with the Rezone application. 5. The applicant should consult with Rich Greene, Meridian Fire Department, regarding Fire Department issues prior to submitting for CZC. 6. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested rezone from l-L to CoG for the extension of the existing CoG zoning to the northern portion of the subject property. """"""-iIso .At'¡-"""'1"..~~ .~~ Ada County Highway District John S. Franden, President David E. Wynkoop 1st Vice President Susan S. Eastlake, 2nd Vice President Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Dave Bivens, Commissioner 3775 N. Adams Street Garden City ID 83714-6499 Phone (208) 387-6100 FAX (208) 387-6391 E-mail: tellus@ACHD.adaJd.us November 2, 2004 RECEIVED NOV - 3 2004 To: Ronald Van Auker 3084 East Lanark Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 City 01 Meridian City Clerk ollice Subject: MRZ-04-12 Rezone NEC Franklin Road and Gaudians Avenue On November 2, 2004, the Ada County Highway District acted on your application for the above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and street improvements, which are required. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 208-387-6177. Andrea N. Tuning Planner III Right-of-way & Development Services, Planning Division CC: Project file, Construction Services, Drainage, Utilities City of Meridian Treasure Valley Engineers 5680 East Franklin Road #220 Nampa, Idaho 83687 .....-;;--.", ~ Ada County Highway District Right-of-Way & Development Department Planning Review Division This application does not require Commission action and is approved at the staff level on Tuesday November 2, 2004. Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant on Friday October 29, 2004. Please refer to the attachment for appeal guidelines. Staff contact: Andrea N. Tuning, 208-387-6177-phone, 208-387-6393-fax, atuninaCfùachd.ada.id.us File Numbers: MRZ-04-012 Site address: NEC Franklin Road and Gaudians Avenue Owner/Applicant: Ronald Van Auker 3084 East Lanark Meridian, Idaho 83642 Representative: Treasure Valley Engineers 5680 East Franklin Road Nampa, Idaho 83687 Application Information: The applicant has submitted an application to the City of Meridian requesting rezone approval. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property from I-L and C- G to CoG. The 3.7 4-acres site is located on the northeast corner of Franklin Road and Gaudians Avenue. Acreage: 3.74-acres Current Zoning: I-L and C-G Proposed Zoning: CoG Vicinity Map !_~ , ' I I A. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Findings of Fact Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 723 additional vehicle trips per day (0 existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of a building permit. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was not required with this application. Site Information: The site is currently vacant. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: a. North: 35.712-acres zoned I-L b. South: Franklin Road and Touchmark Subdivision c. East: 35.712-acres zoned I-L d. West: 1.345-acres and 15.784-acres zoned CoG 6. Impacted Roadways Franklin Road: Frontage: 337-feet Functional Street Classification: Principal Arterial Traffic count: East of Eagle Road was 29,494 on 2-20-02 Level of Service: LOS F Speed limit: 45 MPH An acceptable Level of Service for this segment of roadway is Level of Service D based on the COMPASS Planning Thresholds Gaudians Avenue: Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Speed limit: 402-feet Commercial Street Not Available 20 MPH 7. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site Franklin Road is currently improved with 3-traffic lanes with a west bound right"hand turn lane at the intersection of Franklin Road and Gaudians Avenue. Gaudians Avenue is currently improved as a 40-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk. 8. Existing Right-ot-Way Franklin Road has a total of 98-feet of right-of-way (50-feet from centerline). GaudiansAvenue has a total of 58-feet of right-of-way (29-feet from centerline). 9. Existing Access to the Site The site does not have a delineated driveway that accesses the public transportation system. 10. Site History The Districthas not previously reviewed a development application on this site. 11. Capital Improvements PlanlFive Year Work Program This segment of Franklin Road is in the Five Year Work Program to be improved to a 5-lane roadway with vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk. The project has already gone out to bid and is anticipated to be constructed in 2005. 2 B. Findings for Consideration 1. Franklin Road Right-of-Way and Improvements District policy requires 96-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of-way allows for the construction of a 5-lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot concrete detached sidewalks and bike lanes. District policy requires 7-foot wide attached (or 5-foot detached) concrete sidewalk on all collector roadways and arterial roadways (7204.7.2). This segment of Franklin Road is in the Five Year Work Program to be improved to a 5-lane roadway with vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk. The District has already acquired the right-of-way and slope easements for the reconstruction of Franklin Road between Eagle Road and Touchmark. This project has gone out to bid for the construction of the entire roadway including curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting this site. Due to the fact that the District has already acquired the right-of-way and slope easements for the reconstruction of Franklin Road between Eagle Road and Touchmark and this project has gone out to bid, the District will not acquire any additional right-of-way or improvements on Franklin Road with this application. Driveways District policy 72-F4 (1) requires driveways located on arterial roadways near a signalized intersection to be located a minimum of 440-feet from the signalized intersection for a full-access driveway and a minimum of 220-feet from the signalized intersection for a right-in/right-out only driveway. There are no driveways proposed and no driveways have been approved to intersect Franklin Road. 2. Gaudians Avenue Right-of-Way and Improvements Gaudians Avenue is currently improved as a 40-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk within 58-feet of right-of-way. Due to the fact that Gaudians Avenue is fully improved, the District will not acquire any additional right-of-way or improvements on Gaudians Avenue with this application. Driveways District policy F2-F4 (1) and 72-F4 (2), requires driveways located on commercial/industrial roadways to offset a controlled and/or uncontrolled intersection a minimum of 50-feet (measured near edge to near edge). District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over 1,000 vehicles to a maximum width of 36-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb-cut type facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways. 3 4. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 4 Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing. roadway edge. The applicant has proposed to construct a 25-foot wide driveway that intersects Gaudians Avenue approximately 200-feet north of Franklin Road. This driveway width and location meets District policy and should be approved with this application. The applicant has proposed to construct a 40-foot wide shared driveway that intersects Gaudians Street at the property's north property line (20-feet on this property and 20-feet on the property to the north). Typically, the District restricts commercial driveways to a maximum width of 36-feet in width. Due to the fact that the applicant is proposing to construct a shared driveway, the District is willing to allow the applicant to construct a 40-foot wide driveway. This driveway should be approved with this application. The applicant should provide the District with a copy of a recorded cross access agreement between the two properties allow each property to utilize the shared driveway to access the public transportation system. C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Construct a 25-foot wide driveway that intersects Gaudians Avenue approximately 200-feet north of Franklin Road, as proposed. 2. Construct a 40-foot wide shared driveway that intersects Gaudians Avenue at the property's north property line (20-feet on this property and 20-feet on the property to the north). Provide the District with a copy of a recorded cross access agreement between the two properties allow each property to utilize the shared driveway to access the public transportation system. 3. Pave the driveways their full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Gaudians Avenue and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. D. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site Shall be borne by the developer. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 7. 8. 9. 10. E. 1. 2. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #198, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall berequired to call DIGLINE (1-800~342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusions of Law The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within thevicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1. 2. 3. 5 Vicinity Map Site Plan Appeal Gui.delines Request for Appeal of Staff Decision 1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decisi.on made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. . The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless othelWise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or othelWisemodify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. 6 7 II Development Process Checklist II I8ISubmit a development application to a City or to the County I8IThe City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD I8IThe. ACHD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review I8IThe Planning Review Division will do Q!J§ of the following: DSend a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific requirements at this time. DSend a "Comply Wlth"letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also appl: to this development application. DWrite a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating thE proposal for Its confonnance to District Policy. DWrite a Commission level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its confonnance to District Policy. DThe Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission level reports. DFor ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter: The applicant should submit two (2) sets of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Revie" Division for plan review and assessment of Impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of Impact fee calculation.) The applicant is required to get a pennit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-ot-way, includin¡ but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. DPay Impact Fees prior to issuance ot building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Constructjon (Zone) 0 Driveway or Property Approach(s) Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. 0 Working in the ACHD Right-at-Way Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to ACHD Construction - Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat. done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) 0 Sediment & Erosion Submittal At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done bya Certified Plan Designer. must be turned into ACHD Construction - Subdivision to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Drainage Division. 0 Idahc¡ Power Company Vie Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility pians prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. 0 Final Approval from Development Services ACHD Construction - Subdivision must have received approval from Deveiopment Services prior to scheduling a Pre-Con. 8 Figure 1 I ! ! ¡ I I i I ! --...................... . ..' .t..j "".,.,.",.,.""".", ! t ! ..~.....~......,......J Sian Postina Affidavit RE C E ¡VED :,J,' 0 .' 2004 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLFRK c,FFrr,f The property which is subject to rezone located at the northeast corner of East Franklin Road and North Gaudians Avenue was posted as required by the City of Meridian. Attached is a photograph of the sign posted on the property. Ronald W. Van Auker STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: ) County of ADA On this 9th day of November, 2004, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Ronald W. Van Auker known or identified to me to be the person that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. 11/15/2004 11: 49 FAX 20888868S4 11/15/2e1iJ4 11:5:3 2888877998 MERIDIAN P&Z DEFT. VAN AUKER INC -+ C1ty Clerk ~OO2 PAGE IiJl .."....... ..~.".".."...~,- __-_.n_.. t f\ ~ l' \ \ ~ - - ... iift-+- - ~!!::.- -L - - - - - - ,-~... - -tir- , oN ..- t ---. . 'L_~v=--- í'iiIØ' C;g ~--. ~ ~ - .. - '-+- - - - "'~'"'"-=-- - - - - t I PAFö1CEL t I _I )/ 'I__~___- -J \ .. I!IS'.I'i!- F>Iõi!OPOSED BUILDING I I I t I~ ~ ~~ /. ~ ". U9~ \ \ 00ttttttttttHtt \ ,4:0 \ ~ {..l,}~' L - - - "'.0&' -,....""".,. l. tI;'~ ~ -m', LÞt ('17-"'~\.. \ ~ .. No<' - - ...!!:!....1.::.. - - :'" ~~.. - ,:: ~-:l- ~NK.!:.IN~____"'~'"- RECEIVE! CITY OF MERiDIArJ . Try C! Fr 1/ ,- '-:::;r~' NOU 15 '04 12:14 2088886854 PAGE. 02 CITY OF MER PUBLIC HEA SIGN-UP SH DATE November 18, 2004 PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME Ra NAME (PLEASE PRINT) IDIAN RING EET ITEM # 8 RZ 04-012 ymond Estates FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL 11/15/2004 11:49 FAX 2088886854 MERIDIAN P&Z DEPT. .. City Clerk ~001 66Q e. Watettower Ln., SII!.2O2 Meridian, JD 83642 Phone: (208)884-5533 Fax: (2OB)~ CITY OF MERIDIAN Planning & Zoning To: ClerK's office From: Sonya Allen Fax: Date; 11/15104 Phone: Pages: 2 (Including cover) Re: Raymond EsIates Rezone Application CC: [Jurgent [J For Review 0 pt- Cømment D Please Reply D Please Recycle oCamments Please copy this to everyone for the meeting tomoITOW night. It's a conceptual development plan for the site. 'RECEIVEl) .'1 ~ ;TC!¡ CITY OF MERiDIAN '-;!TY r:~ F!="::< ri::~irr NOV 15 '04 12:13 2088886854 PAGE. 01 D.' "-..,,"","E".'....i'.:. n ~~~:;<\....ltl ~,i it u - 2 ZUJ4 City of Meridian City Clerk Office ~ & ~ 1~ 'DidUa 1503 FIRST SlREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651 -4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 21P¡;,tober, 2004 phones: Area Cod. 208 OFFICE: Nompa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 William G. Berg Ir. City Clerk ...~~. Merldiån, ID 83642 RE: RZ 04-o12/Raymond Estates Dear Will: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the above referenced application for Rezone of3.74 acres from I-L & CoG zones to all CoG zone for Raymond Estates. Thank you, ß.;U¡/~ Bill Henson Asst. Water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District BHldbg c: Water Superintendent File - Office/Shop APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS. 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS. 40,000 G}F'...!!. ~~~iR~~ CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT ~HEALTH Environmental Health Division DEPARTMENT UI,; I 26 ZUU'f Return to: 0 Boise 0 Eagle 0 Garden City ffieridian 0 Kuna OACZ 0 Star Rezone # R.z Or'- 0/;2- Conditional Use # Preliminary / Final/Short Plat ~ tt-V tY!/JAJO ;iE"s Tt9-Te-S I" . ~ City of Meridian City Clerk Offi.. ~. We have No Objections to this Proposal. 0 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. 0 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. 04. We will require more data concerning soli conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. 05. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: 0 high seasonal ground water 0 waste flow characteristics 0 or bedrock from original grade 0 other 0 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. 0 7. This project shall be reviewed by the idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water avaiiability. 0 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposai for: 0 central sewage 0 community sewage system 0 community water well 0 interim sewage 0 centrai water 0 individual sewage 0 individual water 0 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: 0 central sewage 0 community sewage system 0 community water .0 sewage dry lines 0 central water 010. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 0 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. 0 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. 0 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: 0 foodestabiishment 0 swimming pools or spas 0 beverage establishment 0 grocery store 0 child care center 0 14. Please see attached stormwater management recommendations 015. ~~ Reviewed By:¡r/4 c V 1572.00"H0904 Review Sheet MAYOR Tammy de Weer<! LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 4<56-9272 . FAX 466-4405 FARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579' Fax 898-5501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Shaun Wardle William L. M. Nary Charles M. Rountree Keith Bird PUBLIC WORKS (208) 898-5500' Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 . Fax 887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submn your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: November 11, 2004 Transmittal Date: October 20, 2004 Hearing Date: November 18, 2004 File No.: RZ 04-012 Request: Rezone of 3.74 acres from -L & CoG zones to all CoG zone for Raymond Estates By: Ronald Van Auker Location of Property or Project: NEC of East Franklin Road and North Gaudians Avenue David Zaremba, PIZ (No FP) David Moe, PIZ (No FP) Wendy Newton-Huckabay, P/Z (NoFP) Michael Rohm, PIZ (No FP) Keith Borup, P/Z (No FP) Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Charlie Rountree, CIC Christine Donnell, CIC Keith Bird, CIC Shaun Wardle, CIC Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAG, FP) Building Department Fire Department Police Department Cny Attomey City Engineer City Planner Parks Department ~~~~ CITY OF MERIDIAN WASTEWATER DEPT. 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642. (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 . Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 . Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FP/PP only) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power CO. (FP/PP only) Qwest (FP/PP only) Intermountain Gas (FP/PPonly) Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PPon/y) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County Land Records Meridian Development Corporation Historical Preservation Commission x Your Concise Remarks: iVo-CO'Htm . /f- MAYOR Tammy de Weerd olfe;dl«N LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 . PAX 466-4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579' Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (20S) 898-5500' Fax 887-1297 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Shaun Wardle William L M. Nary Charles M. Rountree Keith Bird BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 . Fax 887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: November 11, 2004 Transmittal Date: October 20, 2004 Hearing Date: November 18, 2004 File No.: RZ 04-012 Request: Rezone of 3.74 acres from I-L & CoG zones to all CoG zone for Raymond Estates By: Ronald Van Auker Location of Property or Project: NEC of East Franklin Road and North Gaudians Avenue .x David Zaremba, PIZ (No FP) David Moe, PIZ (No FP) Wendy Newton-Huckabay, P/Z (NoFP) Michael Rohm, P/Z (NoFP) Keith Borup, PIZ (No FP) Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Charlie Rountree, CIC Christine Donnell, CIC Keith Bird, CIC Shaun Wardle, CIC Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP) Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (fPIPP only) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PPonly) Owest (fPIPP only) Intermountain Gas (FPIPPonly) Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PP only) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County Land Records Meridian Development Corporation Historical Preservation Commission Your Concise Remarks: ~ ('AfYl/jA~A_/ A"J ~~ /qiéW;/ dt?1J1 RECEIVED OCT 25 2004 City Of Meridian City Clerk Office 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 . (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 . Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 . Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813