Sewer StudyJune 15, 2001
Department Report
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 19, 2001
APPLICANT Public Works Department -- Gary Smith ITEM NO. 4-A-3
REQUEST Biosolids Dewatering Facility -- Increase to Carolla Engineers' Professional Services
Agreement
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER: See attached
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY , <.
V
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: i
�i
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted: Date:
Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
June 15, 2001 Department Report
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 19, 2001
APPLICANT Public Works Department -- Gary Smith ITEM NO. 4- A-
REQUEST Agreement for Roadway Construction/Water and Sewer Improvements -- Locust
Grove Road, Fairview and Ustick
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
COMMENTS
See attached
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
qv
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:`;
SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
Contacted: Date: Phone:
Materials presented at public meetings shalt become property of the City of Meridian.
0000 W 0 - (D
-1 O o O o -s 'U (D M.
S jCD
-i-ID NNNN _
O. N N N 2 O 0 7
N '�6 '00 W W W CL CD
CD m v v D
-L -+ cco2 O� m
CL tv a13 v W0-1
O
0 CL 3 CD
CL :3n rt
CDD 0 W 0� N (70'0 D Q
n C'1 (D a N C N
p N X0.'00 ��,, m h
�c7o3 02 -I 2 y3 D
CD
0 O X ((D �' N ((D 031 `` (D N'
0 O 11 II rt O 0 O tD
CD D CO MCOD r' 0 7 7 -0
(Q X N CD c U) 00 C1
���O0 CD Cho
CD _ (D 0 ;u m rt O 2)
Q. 3:gym 0 " CLcC O
p
_a: y CD W
o a0 IN
0 0 � d, n
7 O' �?
_ m 0- X
A N 0 � N C1
Z = O 4a <Ay N 69 -09c
r+ 2, 0 000 (coo al 00 7
m If 0)
O ANA O. �.
(D
W O II 11. O O ((0 co C
� 00 4 O
Q'
0 41 0
'03 W fD
CD 3 d
(0D UN �O
w
( 0 PWOO 0 i
(W 0 7 :-4
(D 7 * -0.,
c
CD 1
1 F
CD
O 11 1� N
O�00 0
O
cn
P 4 N
CJt 11
0 11 �
o W CA
O O 69
-69
0 0
0 o O W OO o
O 00 .A (0
O W " O
O (n Cil Cil
rl4
.69CV to1
a 0 - O
$ o rn oo tD
�: o-
�,} f J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
50 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 • Boise, Idaho 83709-0944 • Telephone (208) 376-7330 1 FAX (208) 323-9336
AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES
CLIENT:
PROJECT NAME:
J -U -B Project Number:
The following additional items of work on the project referenced above have been or will
be provided by J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. These additional services are a supplement to the
scope of services contained in J -U -B's existing Agreement for Engineering Services for the
project, dated
Additional Services: 4�
IR1Wk�: ' �Apr,�,J�OV w� 1Jo . 2
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. was verbally authorized to provide these services by:
�r
Name
Date
Unless otherwise noted below, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. will provide these additional
services on a time and materials basis, using the firm's standard billing rates or, if
applicable, the billing rates established in the Agreement for Engineering Services.
Other Basis for Payment: A04&qnyM b •,
Dated this __I&- day of
4002
14tleS7` .
1+d, r0&"0 i9v/
Print or Type Name and i me
7(y C
Z
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
�
IftA
ect Reor a tative Signature
or lime and Title
November 1994
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
ADDENDUM N0. 2
J -U -B Project Number 11757
City of Meridian - Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study
ATTACHMENT #1 - SCOPE OF SERVICES
SECTION 1 - PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
1.1 Addendum No. 1 included contacting property owners along the 10 Mile Diversion
Trunk Corridor, the Purdam-Black Cat Trunk Corridor, and related 9,000 gpm Black Cat
Lift Station as recommended in the Final Draft Ten -mile Interchange Sewer Study
dated March 2002. This Addendum will add six new property owners to those
contacted, develop trunk costs per dwelling unit and land area, investigate the LID
process with a meeting with the City of Nampa, and summarize relative advantages
and disadvantages of funding options for the project.
SECTION 2 - CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The following information and/or services are to be provided by the CITY without cost to
J -U -B.
2.1 Provide ongoing review of J -U -B's work and timely consideration of policy issues within
a time acceptable to both the CITY and J -U -B.
2.2 Assign a CITY representative who will serve as a project liaison with J -U -B and
affected property owners.
2.3 Provide all informational mailings that may be required for the project.
SECTION 3 - SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
1) JUB wilt interview an additional 6 landowners in areas around the study area and modify
the table and summary figure described in. Addendum #1 to reflect additional interviews.
2) JUB will compute the cost of the project per acre for the following scenarios based on City -
provided land areas (from the model):
2a. Trunk cost for "entire service area" served by the individual trunks.
2b. Trunk cost of the "interested party area" served by the individual trunks.
2c. Entire project cost (including lift station and force main) for "entire service area".
2d. Entire project cost (including lift station and force main) for "interested party area".
3) JUB will talk to the City of Nampa about the LID process and determine if it is feasible for
Meridian's project. JUB will arrange and participate in an informational meeting with the City
of Nampa to talk about the LID process.
4) JUB will investigate and summarize the relative advantages and disadvantages of the
project financing alternatives and prepare a summary memo. For certain alternatives, JUB
will note if SFR funding is allowed and prepare a summary of the SRF process.
City of Meridian —Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study
Addendum No. 2, Attachment 1 - Page - 1
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Alternatives will include:
4a. LID
4b. City financed with connection fee (latecomer arrangement)
4c. City/Property Owner partnership
4d. Developer driven financing
4e. Revenue bond
4f. General obligation bond
4g. Judicial confirmation
5) J -U -B will contact (by phone) major "players" in the development of the area to inquire as
to their preference in project financing and to see if they have any input on the options under
consideration.
SECTION 4 - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
4.1 SCHEDULE
The work will be completed in a timely manner upon authorization from the CITY.
J -U -B intends to complete all work in time for a presentation at Council Workshop on
June 11, 2002.
SECTION 5 - COST OF SERVICES
Work described in the Amendment shall be performing on a time and materials basis with an
estimated budget of $3,000.
A labor and equipment detail for these services is presented on Attachment "B".
F:\projectmanagers\tjh\11757\admin\addendum no.2 agreement attach A-1.doc
City of Meridian —Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study
Addendum No. 2, Attachment 1 - Page - 2
Meridian City Council Meeting
May 21, 2002
Page 2 of 99
B. Approve minutes from April 17, 2002 City Council Special Meeting:
C. Approve minutes from April 23, 2002 City Council Regular Meeting:
D. Approve minutes from April 30, 2002 City Council Special Meeting:
E. Approve minutes from May 1, 2002 City Council Special Meeting:
F. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 01-045
Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a 1743 square foot Sandwich
Shop with a drive-thru window in an L-0 zone for Subway by Blaine &
Cynthia Jacobson — Northeast corner of Magic View and South Allen
Street:
G. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: PP 02-005
Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 4 building lots and 1 other lot on
20.01 acres in a C -G zone for Willey Subdivision by Roylance and
Associates -- 3710 East Franklin Road:
H. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: MI 02-004
Request for modification of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
and Order of Conditional Approval of Preliminary Plat regarding the
sidewalk requirement for Elixir Subdivision by Paul B. Clayton — 521
North Eagle Road:
I. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: VAR 02-003
Request for a variance from Meridian City Code 12-2-5 regarding the
sidewalk requirement for Elixir Subdivision by Paul B. Clayton — 521
North Eagle Road:
J. Naming the Los Alamitos / Thousand Springs Park, Kiwanis Park:
K. Change Orders for Meridian Settlers Park:
L. ACHD Impact Fee Offset Agreement for Meridian Settlers Park:
M. Streetlight Agreement for Woodbridge Sub. No. 2:
N. South Slough Sewer License Agreement, Nampa Meridian Irrigation
District:
O. South Slough Sewer Construction Reimbursement, Packard Estates
Developers, LLC:
P. Addendum No. 3 to Agreement for Professional Services, Ten Mile
Interchange Sewer Study — J -U -B Engineers:
Meridian City Council Meeting
May 21, 2002
Page 3 of 99
Q. Agreement for Collection Services on delinquent water / sewer /
trash billing accounts with Collection Bureau, Inc.:
R. Approve Beer / Wine Licenses for Kahootz Pub & Eatery:
Corrie: Item No. 3 is the Consent Agenda. You have the Consent Agenda in front of
you. Any additions, corrections, or anything you want to pull off?
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: Hearing no objections, I'd move that we approve the Consent Agenda and that all
contracts, change orders, and everything and authorized the Mayor to sign and the
Clerk to attest.
Nary: Second.
Corrie: Okay. Motion has been made and seconded to approve the Consent Agenda.
Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll -call vote, Mrs. Clerk.
Roll -Call: McCandless, aye; Nary, aye; de Weerd, aye; Bird, aye.
Corrie: All ayes. Motion is carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 4: Presentation by S.S.I. of S.W.A.C. Ink Cartridge Recycling Program:
Corrie: Next on the Agenda is a presentation by S.S.I. and S.W.A.C. Ink Cartridge
Recycling Program.
Sedlacek: Good evening, Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council, my name is Steve
Sedlacek, business manager of Sanitary Services, 722 West Franklin, Meridian. Good
evening. Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, I have got a quick little handout to give
each of you. Sorry. I'm one or two short. We wanted to talk to you tonight. We are
seeking your approval or disapproval, however you want to go, on a program, a pilot
program, to recycle laser jet and ink jet cartridges as part of your residential and curb-
side recycling program. Councilperson McCandless is on the Solid Waste Advisory
Committee, as is Gary Smith and a few other folks. If I forget to fill in a few blanks here,
go ahead and step in and fill in those slots. Basically E -Tech, which is a nonprofit
organization, located in Eagle and is run by Lisa Marie Goold and Lisa Marie is here
tonight to answer any questions you might be. We believe that there is a market for
used ink jet and laser jet cartridges and E -Tech has approached us with an opportunity
to collect these at the curb and we will place them in our trucks, take them to Western
r U•B ,i
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
250 S. Beechwood Avenue
Suite 201
Boise, Idaho 83709-0944
Telephone: 208/376-7330
FAX: 208/323-9336
mff�m
Vol -
GENTLEMEN:
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE: --A n2 Project No.
PROJECT NAME: to • AAll a 54kkoafL joll
PROJECT MANAGER: -1
SUBJECT:
In -WAItl SButF.t S-TVb"(
M O&AOIUM 2
We are sending you the following items: J�J ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER via
❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ PLANS C' "
❑ COPY OF LETTER ❑ CATALOG Sl -
I
t'
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW
❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ AS REQ
❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ FOR RE'
❑ FOR BIDS DUE
TO US
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE. J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
COPY FOR I I �P*l SIGNED:
Timothy SIGner, P.E.
RECEIVED BY: DATE:
PLEASE SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN COPY TO J -U -B.
)IAN
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
50 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 • Boise, Idaho 83709-0944 * Telephone (208) 376-7330 • FAX (208) 323-9336
AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES
CLIENT: On Of- "^AL1i AP4
PROJECT NAME: W'WLA— 56Wf 2WRI
J -U -B Project Number:
The following additional items of work on the project referenced above have been or will
be provided by J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. These additional services are a supplement to the
scope of services contained in J -U -B's existing Agreement for Engineering Services for the
project, dated �: o
Additional Services: ��
rn1rNi1L��IO�JYN ,VO. Z �1
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. was verbally authorized to provide these services by:
Name Date
Unless otherwise noted below, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. will provide these additional
services on a time and materials basis, using the firm's standard billing rates or, if
applicable, the billing rates established in the Agreement for Engineering Services.
�%AAAtSNb
Other Basis for Payment:
Dated this __I&_— day of
12002
Print qr iWe Client Name
By.—
Clien Representative 4natur� BE AL '
�`�s-a a r e� i
Print or ^Type Name and Title
.ro-nrri Y�+ t7ep v �� C. 7�y clo i�
A i►Ora,ia�l f3, Ca 21, 2002
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
November 1994
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
ADDENDUM N0. 2
J -U -B Project Number 11757
City of Meridian - Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study
ATTACHMENT #1 - SCOPE OF SERVICES
SECTION 1 - PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
1.1 Addendum No. 1 included contacting property owners along the 10 Mile Diversion
Trunk Corridor, the Purdam-Black Cat Trunk Corridor, and related 9,000 gpm Black Cat
Lift Station as recommended in the Final Draft Ten -mile Interchange Sewer Study
dated March 2002. This Addendum will add six new property owners to those
contacted, develop trunk costs per dwelling unit and land area, investigate the LID
process with a meeting with the City of Nampa, and summarize relative advantages
and disadvantages of funding options for the project.
SECTION 2 - CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The following information and/or services are to be provided by the CITY without cost to
J -U -B.
2.1 Provide ongoing review of J -U -B's work and timely consideration of policy issues within
a time acceptable to both the CITY and J -U -B.
2.2 Assign a CITY representative who will serve as a project liaison with J -U -B and
affected property owners.
2.3 Provide all informational mailings that may be required for the project.
SECTION 3 - SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
1) JUB will interview an additional 6 landowners in areas around the study area and modify
the table and summary figure described in Addendum #1 to reflect additional interviews.
2) JUB will compute the cost of the project per acre for the following scenarios based on City -
provided land areas (from the model):
2a. Trunk cost for "entire service area" served by the individual trunks.
2b. Trunk cost of the "interested party area" served by the individual trunks.
2c. Entire project cost (including lift station and force main) for "entire service area".
2d. Entire project cost (including lift station and force main) for "interested party area".
3) JUB will talk to the City of Nampa about the LID process and determine if it is feasible for
Meridian's project. JUB will arrange and participate in an informational meeting with the City
of Nampa to talk about the LID process.
4) JUB will investigate and summarize the relative advantages and disadvantages of the
project financing alternatives and prepare a summary memo. For certain alternatives, JUB
will note if SFR funding is allowed and prepare a summary of the SRF process.
City of Meridian — Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study Addendum No. 2, Attachment 1 - Page - 1
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Alternatives will include:
4a. LID
4b. City financed with connection fee (latecomer arrangement)
4c. City/Property Owner partnership
4d. Developer driven financing
4e. Revenue bond
4f. General obligation bond
4g. Judicial confirmation
5) J -U -B will contact (by phone) major "players" in the development of the area to inquire as
to their preference in project financing and to see if they have any input on the options under
consideration.
SECTION 4 - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
4.1 SCHEDULE
The work will be completed in a timely manner upon authorization from the CITY.
J -U -B intends to complete all work in time for a presentation at Council Workshop on
June 11, 2002.
SECTION 5 - COST OF SERVICES
Work described in the Amendment shall be performing on a time and materials basis with an
estimated budget of $3,000.
A labor and equipment detail for these services is presented on Attachment "B".
F:\projectmanagers\tjh\11757\admin\addendum no.2 agreement attach A-1.doc
City of Meridian —Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study
Addendum No. 2, Attachment 1 - Page - 2
`'
rn
J
4.904
69 �
�
(n H
669
F -O
F-
_N
M
O
U')LONto
LO
to
LO
LO
O
M
N
r
r
N
rr
N
r
rr
r
r
1�
h
Q)r
69
�
69
EA
69
69
09
69
r
w
N
69
N
69
r
69
r
69
r
69
(A
69
(0 cM
E
3
N
tiv
r
-r
-
rO
rnco
toMMM
M(fl(OMMMM
LO
nO
O
U")�oU
61)696969
6969
(s�(»(»sv(»(»(fl
(»
.y O
69
69
N
� O O
� Q
C
O
O
O
O
O
(6 O
O
O
EO
�
_O
6q
N
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
r
— M
'U
7 N
CL Co
LL
O
p
N
N
O
O
O
`
C
p '- N
cm
a C
111
�.
In
N
to
N
LO
N
0
N
t()
N
LO
N
to
N
N
C'j
LO
N
m
LO
!
LO
N
In
N
M
N
LO
Cq
to
0
N
to
N
O
O
G C
r
r
(D
(p
(o
(O
p
O
M
O
O
.N-
U w 0
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
p
O
0000
r
O M
U) d C 69
0 J @
LL
Q
O
to
JQ
N
N
N
(a
to
0_
0
-0
-a
C
C
Cl)
C
to
(0
W ~
>
N
N
Q
Q
JLL
0
m
0
m
@@
Q
Q
F
V)
.�
(U
I—
p
p
(a
(6
Z
O
v
C
o
G
a�
�
0
�
0
LL F' n
'O
m
I—
Y
Y
�"U)
L
'
Y
U
2
C
a�
G
o>
N
Y
'..... E
�
Y
F-
Z
(n
0
Q
Z
Q
Q
�
C
Q
0¢
m
Q
0
_
= a
`
N
r -o
U
_�'
j
z
•0
�°'
�
L
f 1
•�
- cn
O
O
C
�.
0 (n
C
Q.
W C%E
w
C
cn
m
co
2
U)
W w
U-
0.H (n
Z p oO
0:
o,C
_p
>
w Z
z U-
U
N
Lu
J Q2.0
a
c—
a
�Q
N
V.,mh
C'V
'Z
OM
��
T
U. 0)
w
Z
'..O
0
0
W
N
m
O
CL
H J
F•
C
.2
Q
d
J
U
3
r
m
>
3
z
Q N m
• d
a
c
c
O
�
,
rn
O
Z
E
o
m
c
O
c
v
a
J
a
W 2 W
c
o
c
c
c
°
=
U
>
0
C
�
m
C
p
U. 2
c
o
o
c
c
o
0
0WQa
ii
v
v
0
N
m
14
In
(O
U Q Q
�} J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
50 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 • Boise, Idaho 83709-0944 • Telephone (208) 376-7330 • FAX (208) 323-9336
AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES
CLIENT: Co'����
PROJECT NAME: k3'K%Le 56wex "04
J -U -B Project Number: ( til
The following additional items of work on the project referenced above have been or will
be provided by J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. These additional services are a supplement to the
scope of services contained in J -U -B's existing Agreement for Engineering Services for the
project, dated i o
Additional Services:
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. was verbally authorized to provide these services by:
Name
/'
Date
Unless otherwise noted below, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. will provide these additional
services on a time and materials basis, using the firm's standard billing rates or, if
applicable, the billing rates established in the Agreement for Engineering Services.
Other Basis for Payment:
'-
Dated this _ 1tJ _. day of
Zd02
Print or Type Name and iitie
�� Ml7e
v �.
Y
Y _�Ay �r zao z
d n � ✓r,ia�� �, / CO dHGI �
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
-T. 446 t-
ktative Signature
or lime and Title
November 1994
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
ADDENDUM N0. 2
J -U -B Project Number 11757
City of Meridian - Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study
ATTACHMENT #1 - SCOPE OF SERVICES
SECTION 1 - PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
1.1 Addendum No. 1 included contacting property owners along the 10 Mile Diversion
Trunk Corridor, the Purdam-Black Cat Trunk Corridor, and related 9,000 gpm Black Cat
Lift Station as recommended in the Final Draft Ten -mile Interchange Sewer Study
dated March 2002. This Addendum will add six new property owners to those
contacted, develop trunk costs per dwelling unit and land area, investigate the LID
process with a meeting with the City of Nampa, and summarize relative advantages
and disadvantages of funding options for the project.
SECTION 2 - CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The following information and/or services are to be provided by the CITY without cost to
J -U -B.
2.1 Provide ongoing review of J -U -B's work and timely consideration of policy issues within
a time acceptable to both the CITY and J -U -B.
2.2 Assign a CITY representative who will serve as a project liaison with J -U -B and
affected property owners.
2.3 Provide all informational mailings that may be required for the project.
SECTION 3 - SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
1) JUB will interview an additional 6 landowners in areas around the study area and modify
the table and summary figure described in Addendum #1 to reflect additional interviews.
2) JUB will compute the cost of the project per acre for the following scenarios based on City -
provided land areas (from the model):
2a. Trunk cost for "entire service area" served by the individual trunks.
2b. Trunk cost of the "interested party area" served by the individual trunks.
2c. Entire project cost (including lift station and force main) for "entire service area".
2d. Entire project cost (including lift station and force main) for "interested party area"
3) JUB will talk to the City of Nampa about the LID process and determine if it is feasible for
Meridian's project. JUB will arrange and participate in an informational meeting with the City
of Nampa to talk about the LID process.
4) JUB will investigate and summarize the relative advantages and disadvantages of the
project financing alternatives and prepare a summary memo. For certain alternatives, JUB
will note if SFR funding is allowed and prepare a summary of the SRF process.
City of Meridian — Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study Addendum No. 2, Attachment 1 -Page -1
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
Alternatives will include:
4a. LID
4b. City financed with connection fee (latecomer arrangement)
4c. City/Property Owner partnership
4d. Developer driven financing
4e. Revenue bond
4f. General obligation bond
4g. Judicial confirmation
5) J -U -B will contact (by phone) major "players" in the development of the area to inquire as
to their preference in project financing and to see if they have any input on the options under
consideration.
SECTION 4 - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
4.1 SCHEDULE
The work will be completed in a timely manner upon authorization from the CITY.
J -U -B intends to complete all work in time for a presentation at Council Workshop on
June 11, 2002.
SECTION 5 - COST OF SERVICES
Work described in the Amendment shall be performing on a time and materials basis with an
estimated budget of $3,000.
A labor and equipment detail for these services is presented on Attachment
F:\projectmanagers\tjh\11757\admin\addendum no.2 agreement attach A-1.doc
City of Meridian — Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study
Addendum No. 2, Attachment 1 -Page - 2
MERIDIAN CITY OF MERIDIAN
Wastewater Department
3401 N. Ten Mile Road
Meridian, Idaho 83642
208-888-2191 • Fax 884-0744
November 16, 2001
EPA Region 10; OW -133
1200 Sixth Ave.
Seattle, WA 98101
RE: DMR Exception
NPDES ID -002019-2
MERIDIAN
The 5 -day BOD for both the influent and effluent is being reported as having one exception for
the month of October. We experienced some laboratory issues and the first week had only one
reportable number instead of the required two. There were no water quality problems.
Please call me at (208) 888-2191 if you need further information.
Sincerely,
ohn' T. Shawcroft
Wastewater Supt.
Cc: Gary Smith; Meridian Public Works Director
Steve West; Idaho DEQ
Keith Bird; Meridian City Council
Nickie Arnold; EPA Boise
i tyt#r
`itv Cl
MEMO:
To: John Shawcroft
Wastewater Superintendent
From: Brian Wright
Laboratory Supervisor
Date: 10-17-01
RE: REJECTION OF BOD DATA
BOD results for October 3`d and 4th were rejected due to unacceptable low standard
Glucose -Glutamic acid recoveries. This resulted in only one acceptable BOD for the first week
of October. BOD samples have been split with ALI last week and will continue to occur until
the problem with our analysis is resolved.
Copy: Dan Higgs
3
N
O
J
d-
o O
S. n
v
D >
S m
•� N
a W t-4 1-4 { H L^
Z O O P fTt p
W H H H O
fA i} 3s )D� o.3y m
`n
.. 0 :?t
n
-�� f ' :7)
� b
t7 C7
vo
co co
'C7 W W
--4 (� `
N N
y iii a -n r*
Z `s: -n H N
O
A
M C)m b`im�+�:o
3 mr�
cn -i
c
m
w 3,�
I'
r
1 4
3
D
tor
> 13
-4 gy m ;
•• N
3Z
C -m fit m 41 TS (n D
W 1-4 H t- -4 H �
7-C 0.0 moo
w-4 "1-& �
X --1
n -C m -G
'r ►.�
-v r m
C: .
� b
C7 "Cy
Cl
C co CD
'G uj W
•-i Ov CT
N N
C) v
r m
C
N
a
Z
m
H
Z
O
Z
i A
a
n {
w
%t
ii
D
O
m
T
r > p' >
v m
t_mmrn-F'a
SHS-+Hr�HL
C7 C� CJ M C.) p
H H!-1f� C
In b D A
u 4 M+ a
C-) S n !
,Y 1 H --i •-i w
-•i m X --I
`n -< Z tri -<
v Ct H
*v r 55 =
r1,
o
� G `o
t.-4 > it
W 0
C CiJ OD
W w
0 01�
N N
0
H
°z
rn
H
00
Z i-4
O�
O
3
C
mo
G�m`
c a Z
7o
On
Zx
{O
�
o0
�m
ai
v
a ao
O=
C
o
4
n
e-,
.�
�a
O
m
<
T
? m
C7 -n .•
A
WO
ro
�o m)>
IL
�-,
M r �.
M
to
$1_�"'
r
r
m
S
im
�
x
3
w
�I
3
w
w
0
J
D
m
> > >A
i• N
c.nimm m>
t, ;o 71 t' (4 ;o 3
s-, 0-1 --4H
t� cn c m t� c
HH W ZXFdt O
Lh b > > o m
2 z z z;o H
c'S C1
C M 7j `4
-C Z M �
In -tl
TI H � 'T1
m
� o
C co W
`0 W lu
--4 Or,
tv N
m o m'.
= i' "n h•i t!1 *
(A 21 C C
m r CS3 C"1
..�CSn%vxs
C) lit
a
--i G) N
H n, r-
M t�1
• �- m
e�
0
t N
•o
rr
)1. z
0 co W m v -4 In > )p i
0 co 'v (/) -4
0 > w m r) m C-) n m rl I 0 - x I
r 0 3: OW 0 m Z
m
DA►
V)Z tA
Z un
m X 1-4 c- M M m., M>
mma )> m 1-4
2 .__4 n > z o 0>0
m CD 0 w 1-4 P-1 0
x C) X (04
0 1. > > c) I>
10 m z
M YZ 22A -4z
Z Ma -4 m
jo M
-4 z
5 gct m PH -4
Z r
11-0 o...1
0 n z m
>
X In
m Hipfiii�i�i� m on
>
>
O > A --i-Oix., 10
> x.I
>
(n > CA (A
40CD
m r r" m r-
>rn�X.
F
X
Z
z
-4
.... ..... m zO
... .... Xx.
co
-.100< -0 w W34 . .... .
-A* m
m
...........
G)
AL Vr
41
z
1. aw
14
......... .
>
0
x
..........
....... ..
...........
;L ...... c b
..........
..........
..........
-it
all S. 2
.... .....
I" - M:
z
S 0
AO FA z
ul
0
$a
.43 z
...... ..
O
....... ... ......
0
C
mm
2 0-
... ......
..........
0
0
0
>
tpw
MO..........
>
C.)
..... .. ..
> 0
.........
.... . ....
0
........ ..
. ...... ..... .
.. ........... ..........
052 m
..........
m v ....... m
............ z
C C_
C+i" f1 CiI
.. ........
....... ...
X 0 Lao M 3> 1'4
.......... ............
io.'. _$ a 7. w 7.
..... ... ...... . R
c IL Z. N
.......... . ..........
........... ..........
........... ........... ...........
rn
.......... ..........
su
AD
.......... .........
........... .....
.......... .......... ... .
. . ..... .......... ..........
... .....
...........
M> OD
C) m r. h M c
Z CK) m 73 z tr X
c 00
x -0
x jo
0-4 Zu T
A., %� -
N z
-A m F
0 . x P-
T ......... �ffl
..... .... ....
> ....... .
O -4 -4
I
.... .....
� f J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
50 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 • Boise, Idaho 83709-0944 • Telephone (208) 376-7330 • FAX (208) 323-9336
AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES
CLIENT: G &Y of ihf-Ib1A 4
PROJECT NAME: "'j1E�,i"-•'•:� ct�.1Q2 STN"t
J -U -B Project Number:'
The following additional items of work on the project referenced above have been or will
be provided by J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. These additional services are a supplement to the
scope of services conta'ned in J -U -B's existing Agreement for Engineering Services for the
project, dated Sit *I
Additional Services: 4Ef' -' a"�twi,A�rnn Nu.1
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. was verbally authorized to provide these services by:
Date
Name
Unless otherwise noted below, J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. will provide these additional
services on a time and materials basis, using the firm's standard billing rates or, if
applicable, the billing rates established in the Agreement for Engineering Services.
Other Basis for Payment: `� 4'� ,xA.00"00'v%
Dated this
(5 day of _
Print oyTyge Client Name
Representative Signatu
�,060,r%D. CorcIe
Print oriName and l
AAA( &W 2002
If
S �CifyCler
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc.
"•Project
Represe tive Signature
F�
` , f
y�i • f fi,
�
i4IT
�a�,.�,�„•,„�rl'"'.�. 4:
Print or Type Name and Title UNC
�
November 1994
If
S �CifyCler
' J -U -B ENGINEERS, In('
i
ADDENDUM N0. 1
J -U -B Project Number 11757
City of Meridian - Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study
ATTACHMENT #1 - SCOPE OF SERVICES
SECTION 1 - PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
1.1 The CITY intends to complete preliminary contact with affected property owners along
the 10 Mile Diversion Trunk Corridor, the Purdam-Black Cat Trunk Corridor, and
related 9,000 gpm Black Cat Lift Station as recommended in the Final Draft Ten -mile
Interchange Sewer Study dated March 2002. A significant portion of the project is
Located on private property requiring private easements. The CITY's goals are to
gather public input on the project, concerns, issues, timelines, and ascertain general
acceptance of the project.
SECTION 2 - CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The following information and/or services are to be provided by the CITY without cost to
J -U -B.
2.1 Provide ongoing review of J -U -B's work and timely consideration of policy issues within
a time acceptable to both the CITY and J -U -B.
2.2 Provide copies of the proposed comprehensive planning maps to determine probable
future land uses in the area. Provide in digital format, aerial base mapping (COMPASS
data ) in the subject study area.
2.3 Assign a CITY representative who will serve as a project liaison with J -U -B and
affected property owners.
2.4 Provide all informational mailings that may be required for the project.
SECTION 3 - SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
3.1 PRELIMINARY EXHIBITS
A. J -U -B shall prepare an exhibit drawing of the preferred trunk sewer alignments
and the proposed location of the 9,000 gpm pump station using CITY provided
aerial base mapping and the exhibits completed in the Ten Mile Interchange
Study. The exhibit will use the Ada County G.I.S. base map for property
ownerships, topography, and aerial topography. The exhibit will be in color
and show the overall project at a scale of 1 "=200'. Individual exhibits for each
property will not be provided. Property ownership wilt be research using the
Ada County G.I.S. database.
City of Meridian — Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study Addendum No. 1, Attachment 1 - Page -1
t J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inr"
3.2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SERVICES
A. Property Owner Interviews
Prior to contacting individual property owners, J -U -B will develop an interview
outline with a proposed list of topic questions. The outline will be submitted
to the CITY for review, and revised accordingly. The interview questions will
be general for informational purposes, and not entail specific easement
negotiations.
J -U -B will contact property owners along the trunk sewer corridors and target
lift station site. J -U -B shall meet individually with each affected property
owners and conduct the interviews. For the purpose of estimating fees, one
(1) meeting, one (1) hour in duration is assumed for each of the affected
property owners. An assumed number of property owners to be contacted are
listed on Attachment "B"
B. Informational Summary
J -U -B shall provide a summary memorandum of each interview and compile in
a summary document. Additionally, an overall checklist summary will be
prepared listing property owner name, and informational highlights. J -U -B
shall prepare a summary exhibit showing properties -in question, and
information of interest.
J -U -B will submit three (3) draft copies of the documents to the CITY for
review and comment. J -U -B shall meet with the CITY to review the
information. J -U -B will incorporate CITY review comments and publish (12)
final copies of the summary document.
C. City Council Workshop Meeting
J -U -B shall assist CITY staff in presenting the status of the public involvement
to the City Council. J -U -B shall complete a summary exhibit drawing with
handouts to be used in the presentation. J -U -B shall prepare a brief
presentation to the Council which will address the following:
Goal of initial public involvement process
Generalized Findings:
1. Properties which appear favorable to project (granting
easements), or unfavorable;
2. Properties which may actively participate in project; and
3. Development timelines of project.
Recommendations
3.3 BUDGETING SUPPORT
A. J -U -B will assist the City with estimating preliminary and final design fees,
easement acquisition costs, etc., as deemed appropriate for fiscal year 2003
budgeting purposes..
City of Meridian — Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study Addendum No. 1, Attachment 1 - Page - 2
J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc,
f
SECTION 4 - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
4.1 SCHEDULE
The work will be completed in a timely manner upon authorization from the CITY.
J -U -B intends to complete the informational meetings within 3 to 4 weeks of
authorization and preferably by mid-April, 2002. However, the availability of the
property owners is unknown which may impact schedule.
SECTION 5 - COST OF SERVICES
Work described in the Amendment shall be performing on a time and materials basis with an
estimated budget of between $4,000 and $6,000.
A labor and equipment detail for these services is presented on Attachment "B".
F:\projectmanagers\tjh\11757\admin\addendum no.1 agreement attach A-1.doc
City of Meridian — Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study Addendum No. 1, Attachment 1 - Page - 3
> > 0
71
w.co
> M
0 Z 0
X v "n
c L,
A m rn
Z`
I
c
a'
Z
1 i<
ia 0,
CD
M
(MI)
U)
IUD D
0 CD
j(D
, F) F
T) m
CD
@
0 0
I CO -0 m
—,o
0 -0
>
1=1>
-u
CDj-
D
Z
m
13 1@
1w� oISI
-0
-!
n
CD
D
m
IOD
ID '0 0 �i;,5.
=r
m
'0
C) M
0
T
J CD
3
0
C: 3
U)
-
3
CD
10 = A,,, >
Co (D
M
(D 10
>
0
c E >
>
(i) 1�19 11 cn
X
ol
0) 11
m z
Xt X(D
(01 m
0 ::E'o:
0
Fn o
C CD
CD
z
m
CD
ID
Lo=, ICD
<
v U)
rN
SOD)
r
0
(a 0
U) -
r
m m
Cl)
"a
I
Cl)
(on
CD
>
AGO
-V
m
CD
cn
c
<
IGF)
M
co
:2. —0.
:3 (D
ID
(D
K
rl)
�4
0.
ty
-4
0
0
i!
11
,1
(P
inIC71
1,b
n (.ni
:-4
C) 0! I
IPI
0)
01
c
0— cz
69
6q V)
p
GlY Q)
6q
'Gq
CY)
.60
0 0 cn
77
0 13)
,N0
03
0)
(A t\)r\),
F\)
CT)
i II
Al
W (n -
" — I w
-co
09 69
CO IQ
N
N)
1
, co
(D
w
cc)
-4 (P
(n (D� co
031
cn 0)
A 0
0 >
co
co
r
co
-4
cn
Meridian City Council
Strategic Planning Workshop
December 11, 2001
Page 19
some not. I would be more than happy to see what I can do assist in that arena.
Thank you for hearing me.
Issue #4 Discussion of the Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study;
Bird: Council, the next item is the discussion of the Ten Mile Interchange. I
believe Brad is here to present that with all his — and Dakota Development and
JUB.
Watson: Thank you President Bird and Council members tonight we have JUB
Engineers here to present the results of a draft sewer study they did on the Ten
Mile interchange area. As you may recall, the study originated with the Dakota
Companies request for more detailed se ering information in that area, a little
more detail than what we had on the plan.
Bird: Brad, we need that. Kind of put that over here so the public can see, plus
that we can see.
Watson: Council approved this contract with JUB in May and Dakota Company
agreed to reimburse for costs of this study. JUB submitted a preliminary draft in
September, with four options. After looking at those myself, with JUB and Dakota
Company, we asked them to go back and investigate yet a fifth option. They had
that done around the 11t of November. Unfortunately we didn't get it on the
agenda for the November planning meetings and here we are tonight. The one
thing to point out — this study area really concentrates on the east side of Ten
Mile Road between Franklin and 1-84. Because some of these options affect the
trunk on the east side, or on the west side excuse me, I sent a letter out to many
of the property owners last week, and I think some of them are here in
attendance. I wouldn't know them by their face but I think they may be here. I did
tell them they were welcome to listen but this wasn't a public hearing and that no
decisions would be made tonight. The purpose of this is to start the discussion,
ultimately we will want some direction. After discussion we will pursue some
recommendations to see what Council thought of this. With that, I am going to
turn this over to Tim Haener with JUB Engineers, project manager. Phil
Kirchbaum, who slaved over our master plan for several years, seemed like
years — he is here too. He is going to give a
briefsynopsis of the study and hand
out some material and then open it up for questions.
Haener: Everything that we are going to show on the boards is in your handout
packet. There is a lot of information in your handout packet that I am not going
over tonight. We just wanted to go over the broad rush of the fivelew of optionshe process
we looked
we went through and then the results of the analysis
at. Basically what we are looking at is sewer alternatives for a proposed
development near the intersection of Franklin Road and Ten Mile Road, that is
indicated in yellow here, in this quadrant right here. It comprises about 330 acres
Meridian City Council
Strategic Planning Workshop
December 11, 2001
Page 20
and the goal of the study was to determine — review interim sewer options to get
service to the parcels and also at the same time, make sure that those options
integrate well with the master plan of the sewers in the area. The steps for
determining the alternatives was to first take a look at what they proposed for
land use in the area, and use those land uses to generate sewer flows that would
come from the area. Of those 330 acres we determined that there is going to be
about 420 gallons per minute generated as a peak flow. That is what we would
need to accommodate in the interim, until sewers can be extended out to the
service area. One of the things we wanted to make sure, like I mentioned before,
to make sure this is all going to integrate well with the master plan, if you'll look in
the back of your handout packet, to figure A-3, you'll recognize that as a portion
of your master plan map. Showing the trunks that are built
right
now,future.hat you
If you
have in the ground, and also the trunks that are planned r
look at that figure closely, you can see the planned trunks are identified by dash
lines and existing trunks are identified by solid lines. Different colors mean
different diameters of the pipe. A couple things to note first of all,
there are two
trunks that will be placed sometime in the future, depending on growth, that will
eventually serve this area. One is the Ten Mile Trunk, that extends across here
to the developed area. The other is what we call the Perdam-Black Cat Trunk
and that comes a little bit more to the south eefore it heads by thetareato h theknosubwect ng
area. Knowing the flows that are going to generated
what the master plan sewer system is going to look like, we can brainstorm some
alternatives for getting sewer out to the area as quickly as possible. And also
integrate it with the master plan. We can go through those alternatives one by
one. There are five of them. I am going to give ou a brief overview of the
alternative, the advantages, disadvantages of each, and then I will give you two
y
costs. One is a present worth cost, over a fifty-year life cycle of the project. The
second cost is the upfront, what you would have to build soon cost. I know
decisions have to be made that are going to take into consideration both of those
costs. So lets do the first alternative. That is — turn to figure A-6 in your handout
packet. That is this next board. The subject area is shown by the green and the
red. Kind of for Christmas I guess. The Dakota parcel themselves are the red
and the other subject area within the area of study is in green. So it is a pretty
good significant portion of one section of land near the corner of Franklin and
Ten Mile Road. You can see the freeway down here. This firstoption
mineded eases to
building this Ten Mile Trunk which is an eighteen -Inch line thatthen
21 inches. Go ahead and put this in the ground to convey flow from the subject
area and then build a small temporary pump station near the corner of Cherry
Lane and Black Cat Road. This small pump station would then convey that flow
of 420 gallons per minute through a six inch force main to an existing trunk which
you already have built right here, this twelve inch trunk right here, that has
capacity to handle that. That would discharge to the Ashford Greens pump
station. The advantages of this alternative are that it maximizes the use of the
Ashford Greens pump station. It has low traffic impacts because a lot of your
construction is not in roads. It also builds a good portion of the Ten Mile trunk.
Meridian City Council
Strategic Planning Workshop
December 11, 2001
Pa a 21
9
The disadvantages are it does not allow infill ithis
Does
not
allow
development in this area because you are
irredbYts Pump station capacity.
station at
Also another disadvantage is that it requires operation of the pump station
Ashford Greens and there is some throw away costs in that this pump
would eventually be abandoned. The fifty year — you'd build this to get interim
ncreas sand this builds out, you
to this parcel and then as development
would eventually have to build the master station lan her, the Bl a force Trunk,
to the
Perdam-Black Cat Trunk to the regional lift
treatment plant. So over a fifty year time span, the present worth of this project is
nine million dollars. The upfront capital costs to
build just
u t what and is shown,i s his
map, in other words this trunk, this temporary pump
million dollars. That is the first alternative wenn d at. The second handout packet. aThat,athis
is shown on figure A-7. the very next one your
alternative also builds a good portion of the Ten
oiint rather than upe Trunk, to serve hherercThis
el. It
then constructs a regional lift station at thisp of
regional lift station will be sized from nine thousand
itgalllons per diameter to insteadce main to
420 gallons per minute. It also requires a large thirty
-inch
built on the way to the treatment plant. Theadvantages
alternativelseovetr a f fty
is it
had the least present worth cost than any of the other gravity trunk all the way
year life span. That is because it eliminated this deep g Y
from here to here, because the force main i �mpact on trafficyou save lbecausecant t t
over the long term. The forced main would have less
is going to be shallower along Black Cat Road. It also allows infill to occur
anywhere in this area development n an °e thestreatmentyou ve the plant pump The
station in place and the force mal place o
disadvantages are that since you are building u�d normallye main ere, it dischargedthrough
require
that gravity trunks upstream of here, that v
gravity trunk here, they can't discharge at the force main so you have to reroute
those. Those were accommodated in our estimat • it would
also
have bathat this
pump station be installed for the life of the project,
You
woulpump station here and also the Ashford Greens altee retained
rnativump e station
8 4 milk on dollars
also. The fifty year present worth cost for this
and the initial capital cost was 4.8 million dollars infSo ormation, si o fi a sumhmaryrof'the
capital costs than alternative one. Just for your
capital costs is shown on page ten of the packet.
rnativellwei Nought how about f we
to the next one in your
handout packet, alternative three. This or
just build everything that is called for in the master including Ten an upstream of the _ Mile Trunk, a portion of
downstream of the development site nclud n g
the deep Black Cat Trunk, lift station and build
force
are built and they are built
plant. The advantages of these are that all sewers
now rather than Iter. Traffic along blackf youwait buient ld this you
long there
is only going to get more significant over time and
may have more impact to the public later than
l�n placee Ito all thralalowsin hnfill
ere
can go ahead and build out because you have the trunk
development all through there. You would eliminate the Ashford Greens lift
Meridian City Council
Strategic Planning Workshop
December 11, 2001
Page 22
station. The disadvantages are, it is a big project. Initial capital cost of 7.3
million dollars in a fifty year -- present worth cost of 9.5 million dollars. So you
are not deferring a lot of the large capital costs by going to an interim solution,
you are building your ultimate system right now. Another disadvantage is it has
the highest present worth cost because you are not deferring that cost.
Alternative four, we kind of went the other direction on that one. On this one we
opt to build the least we can by using some reserve capacity that is available in
this trunk that snakes its way up through here. This is an existing trunk that we
have identified as having about one cfs or 450 gallons per minute of capacity
after everything is built out. There is a little bit of room in that trunk. So what we
did is — in this option we built the gravity lines within the system, put a temporary
pump station there, that has 420 gallons per minute to serve the parcel, a six
inch force main to discharge right there. The advantages of this alternative are, it
has very low initial capital costs it defers a major portion of your construction
which lowers the ultimate capital costs. It has little impact to residence initially
because of the fact that you are not building a lot. The area left of the
development can also develop if they build a similar pump station and force main
to the Ashford Greens lift station. Which we will cover in the next alternative. But
I just wanted to mention it here too. Disadvantages are that it doesn't allow any
infill other than this area here because we don'thave the here and one atty in place. Ashford Greens!
have to operate two small pump stations, one
Postponing the large trunk construction may have more impact later because of
more disruptions because of your growth. Like I mentioned before. There is also
a small throw away cost in that this pump station will be yanked out of the ground
when this trunk comes out here. The fifty year present worth cost for this
alternative is 8.8 million dollars and initial capital cost is 1.4 million dollars. A
significant amount of that capital cost is the trunks that are built within the sites
themselves. I believe the pump station and force main are only about three or
four hundred thousand dollars of that. The final alternative which is on figure A-
10 of your handout, is the same one that we just went over with just a little bit of a
twist. That twist is that it reroutes the Perdam-Black Cat Trunk instead
cutThe
ting
across this field like this, reroute it down Franklin Road up en Mil
reason for doing that is to make it so you don't acquire easements along here.
You build a new right-of-way. Advantages of this option are the same as option
four. You have low capital costs because you are building just a small pump
station and force main here. The areas west of the subject area can also
develop if they build their own small pump the Perdam-Blackrce Taunk in to tlti alplows
oint
here. No easements are required for
development west of the area. Some of the disadvantages are again, the same
as option four. You can't develop anything in here because there is no capacity.
Also one of the disadvantages are that by rerouting this trunk,long these
rights
b
of way, it's a little bit longer and a little bit deeper. Its a little tan cost
nsive
and that counteracts not having to get any easements. The fifty year capit
of this alternative is 9.2 million dollars and
this d the initil a lift station or this force
lcost is n million
main
dollars. That 1.6 million dollars does not
Meridian City Council
Strategic Planning Workshop
December 11, 2001
P e23
ag
for potential development west of the property. It's just for the lift station and
force main here. With that brief presentation, I would just like to open it up for any
questions you might have about this.
Anderson: Mr. President
Bird: Mr. Anderson.
Anderson: Aren't part of the trunk lines
tthat
candCat
are theyhave
n and to
n't we
been paying some of those developers ooversize them
the right grade and oversized now?
Watson: Mr. President, Council members,
the stuff that is in Black Cat right now
is only for a specific service area, served by that Ashford lift station. There was a
latecomers agreement that came to you lasweek for a watr t
ine — maybe that's
what you are thinking of. The line that is n Black Cat, thatsgoing into Ashford
lift station, is twelve inch. It does serve more than just one subdivision but it's a
very specific, finite area and it is not the permanent line by any means.
he
Anderson: Is that the one that we paid thecontractor
d them ize it to ovees'izeshere
didn't need that big of a line for somethingwe
p
recently. Don't know if wasn't water or sewer.
on
Watson: That gravity line in Black Cat was
t elf It by Brighton was constructed by the city in
Ashford Greens Subdivision. The lift statin
1997. We constructed the pressure mains too. We didn't have any part in the
sewer in Black Cat.
Nichols: Mr. President.
Bird: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Brad, aren't some of the lines in Bent the Ten Mile or Black Cat ar Creek oversized to take re of
the upstream stuff which would eventually go
Watson: Mr. Nichols, and Council persons, you got me — I remember now,
Blackstone subdivision, there is a short piece of the most downstream part of the
Ten Mile diversion trunk that — it's a dry line that in there, they are not actually
using it. but it was. We asked them to put aCat thatsso short that it s oversized. That'stoo far
my
mind. You are right. there is none in Black
away. We couldn't have set elevations when that was going through.
Bird: Council, any other questions? Thank you very much Brad.
Meridian City Council `
Strategic Planning Workshop
December 11, 2001
Page 24
Watson: Thank you President, Council members. And if you have any
questions, feel free to let me know. It is a lot of information.
Issue #5 Discussion of the White Sewer Trunk and North Slough Trunk:
Bird: While you are still there Brad, are you the one that is taking the White
Sewer and North Slough Trunks, give us some updates on that?
Watson: Yes, Mr. President. I need to gather materials. I have brought handouts
and pictures and everything but I think you guys want some -- if you will give me
a minute I will get it all together.
Bird: Are you ready Brad?
Watson: Thank you Mr. President and Council members. I believe Will has
gotten to you both a map that is the same as this exhibit up here and also a one
sheet summary of the easement status on the White Drain Trunk sewer. I don't
know if you want me to go through each one of those. We have seven of the ten
easements. The school district delivered their signed easement to me before
tonight's meeting. So actually we have eight signed easements out of town. The
two outstanding are Primeland Development and Cedar Springs project. For
each one of those property owners I have some status comments and the next
column has some follow up as required by the city. The plans have been, at
least the first go around, the plans have been finalized and submitted to DEQ
about two weeks ago. We don't have an approval letter back from them yet, we
should shortly. The one thing that I have been working out with Briggs
engineering over the last couple days and Keller Associates is the final alignment
of the sewer through Bridgetower with some very minor tweaking going on. I also
met with David Turnbull of Brighton Corporation last Friday to discuss preliminary
plans.. Other than that, I would be happy to answer any questions for you. I hope
this is adequate, I look at this every single day so I know exactly which fence
post we are talking about there, and I failed to realize sometimes that other
people don't.
Anderson: I guess I am a little confused why we don't have a signed easement
with Bews. When we approved that project clear back in July, I thought that was
a done deal. Other than a few adjustments on where they are going, what is
holding up that easement there? I don't understand that. That is the first one —
Bird: Read your note Ron, I don't think we need to be discussing that at this
point.
Watson: I have been told it will be a point of discussion and on the agenda next
Tuesday night.
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 33
individuals that are left. Well, at least one. The other one kind of tags along with the first
one.
De Weerd: So, where all does this take the South Slough then? It takes it over Eagle.
Watson: It comes from Chamberlain Estates, through some other developed property
into Carol Sub. That's a County subdivision.
De Weerd: Yes.
Watson: It hits Leslie Way and then it goes both south and north. The north leg goes up
to Ustick and just crosses Eagle. It will stop on the east side of Eagle. The south way
comes through Leslie Way and the same thing. It just stops on the east side of Eagle.
Watson: We're getting there.
De Weerd: Any other questions?
Bird: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: How long to completion, Brad on this once it's bid and awarded?
Watson: About six months.
Bird: Six months?
Watson: Our consultant agrees.
De Weerd: I like how that works. So, by the end of the summer? Possibly?
Watson: Yes, usually when we bid, there's about a two to four week period of
paperwork and ordering materials. Early fall, by the time it gets cleaned up and tested,
and operational. That's our hope.
F. Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Trunkline project:
De Weerd: Thank you. You made that short enough I'll let you talk about the Ten Mile
Interchange sewer stuff.
Watson: Madam President, I think Gary is going to do most of the talking on this. We did
plan to put this on the overhead. We have some members in the audience who are here
for this.
De Weerd: I assumed that.
ti
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 34
Watson: We were just going to put it on the projector. We don't have that operational.
So, if anyone wants a copy of this drawing, please give me a call at some point
tomorrow, whenever, or give me your name after the meeting or something like that.
We'll make sure we get one to you.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: This is an informal dialogue. If you have questions, just raise your hand and
I'll recognize you.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: I will ask you to come forward if you have questions so we can get it on the
tape.
Smith: Madam President, Mayor and Council. Several weeks ago JUB Engineers made
a presentation to you with several alternatives for sewering this area generally known as
the intersection of Franklin Road and Ten Mile Road. This study was initiated by the
Dakota Company who was the original representative of the property owner that is
shown in the pink color on your map, which is labeled, figure A 13. As part of the
presentation that JUB made to you at that time, there was discussion about a projected
schedule to construct and there was also some discussion about another alternative
that in effect serve more property than what property was being represented at the time
by Dakota Company. Since that time, Dakota Company is not involved in representation
of the owner. There's another company and I think it's called Retail Properties West now
representing the property owner who is East Bourne Investments out of Canada. The
figure A 13 is a representation of an alternative that would be part of the ultimate
sewering of the southwest area of Meridian. Primarily, the Ten Mile Diversion Trunk
construction and there's a short section at the bottom of the colored area that's labeled
build dry line trunks. That would also be a portion of the trunkline extending under the
interstate continuing to the south and east to serve additional property which ultimately
would be the Black Cat Trunk serving Bear Creek for example and some property to the
south and east of Bear Creek. From your staff's standpoint, I guess our feeling is that a
project such as this needs to serve more property than what it originally started out to
study. That is just the property that East Bourne Investments was interested in
developing. I think that we would be probably criticized if additional property adjacent to
these pieces could not get sewer service. The installation of a lift station on Franklin and
Ten Mile Road with a length of pressure main of Ten Mile to discharge into the sewer
line that exists on Ten Mile somewhat north of Pine would serve this development. It
would not serve, for example, the property to the north side of Franklin Road and to the
east of Ten Mile Road. That question was immediately posed to us by that property
owner because they became aware that this study was being done. I think in the
interest of development in this area, we wanted to look at this scenario. JUB did project
some costs for this and I guess it opinion of probable cause and also created a
preliminary project schedule.
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 35
Unidentified Speaker: Do you mind if I ask which piece of property East Bourne
Investments own? Thanks.
Smith: It's the property that's shaded in pink.
Unidentified Woman: Okay.
Smith: The property that's shaded in green, there are several other property owners. I
don't know what the split of property ownership is there. I talked to East Bourne's
project representative as far as time goes on this development. They're pretty much
hinged around the development of the interchange. The word I get from them is
optimistically that project is two and a half to three years for completion. That's
optimistic. Pardon me?
Unidentified Man: The interchange, two and a half to three years?
Smith: Yes.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: I hope so. I hope they're right.
Bird: I do too.
Smith: I think the speed that an interchange develops is directly proportional to the
amount of private of money that's invested in it. I don't know how that works for sure. I
guess there is some money that's available for this. Private money that's available to
construct the interchange. Again, I don't know how much that is. I don't know what kind
of conversations have been had between the developer, or landowner and ITD. It's my
understanding that the president of the company is in town this week and meeting with
his representatives so maybe some additional information will come to us. The financing
of the project of course is still something that needs to be discussed in depth. We have,
as I mentioned earlier, we have the costs, an opinion of probable costs from JUB. For
the project that's shown on A 13, figure A 13, we also have the opinion of probable
costs for the small lift station and the force main in Ten Mile Road that will serve just this
property. The green and the pink property. JUB has split out the cost of what would be if
this trunkline was constructed as shown on figure A 13, they have split out the cost that
could be attributable to the development shown in the area shaded pink and green from
that total cost. Overall, to build the Ten Mile Diversion Trunk, the 12 inch lateral in Ten
Mile Road, the dry sewer lines within the development and the lift station and force main
is 4.89 million estimated cost. Of that, we feel that the developer's share based on a
percentage of flow from this development, estimated flow from this development to the
total capacity of the pump station is roughly 1.2 million which leaves 3.7 million to be
financed by others assuming that the developer will subscribe to this share.
De Weerd: These are the costs on the 13 option?
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 36
Smith: Correct. Yes. The study that JUB did, I can't remember how many alternatives
there were. Five? Five alternatives were presented by JUB in their packet that they
handed --. Yes, correct. So, it's still a decision that needs to be made. This, figure A13 is
what we feel, as your staff would be appropriate to construct. Brad and I talked earlier
that the range here in costs of what to build would be from on the low end building a lift
station at Franklin and Ten Mile Road and 3,000 pressure main to serve the property
shown in the green and the pink. That's the economy model. You can go up to the other
end of the scale and you construct a 42 -inch trunkline in Black Cat Road, which is the
ultimate fix for sewering, all of south west Meridian.
De Weerd: What is the cost difference between the two options to the developer?
Smith: to this developer?
De Weerd: Yes. If you went with the lift station that would only serve that down Ten Mile
what was the cost to that project versus A 13?
Smith: 375,000 for the developer cost to just serve --.
De Weerd: So, we're asking for a substantial increase in investment to this developer by
doing it the correct way?
Smith: The 375,000, that includes (inaudible) and the first main (inaudible). It did not
include the 12 line in Ten Mile. It did not include the dry line.
Unidentified Man: The 375,000 represented by what's in red here. That would be built if
the case occurs where the sewer service isn't extended by the time (inaudible). That
would be their option to construct that little pump station (inaudible).
De Weerd: Now, if you allowed that to happen, could they also incur costs of bringing
the main line down at some later point?
Smith: Well, it becomes a real interesting discussion where a developer has, I think in
effect, you've taken the developer out of the picture in financing the other sewer line. If I
were in their shoes and I came to them, or the City comes to me and says well now that
you have service we'd like you to participate in this trunkline. I would kind of look at
them like, well exactly why do you want me to do this because I already service? I think
it would be a real tough sell.
Nichols: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nichols.
Nichols: Gary, on the estimate of cost, --. Let me back up. Do we have easements for
this diagonal dark black line here? This property clear over to Black Cat?
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 37
Smith: No sir.
Nichols: Did the cost estimate include the cost of acquiring those easements?
Smith: I think so.
(inaudible discussion amongst audience)
Nary: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I guess I didn't understand the dark diagonal line. What would be the increased
cost to just build this in the right-of-way so we don't have to get all these easements?
Would it be a significantly large increase?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Nary: To just build it in the right-of-way?
Unidentified Speaker: Actually just the Black Cat (inaudible).
Nary: I didn't know if this was going to be something that two years from now, we're
going to say we've almost got all these easements. If we're going to build it, lets just
build it.
Watson: Madam President.
De Weerd: Yes.
Watson: I think that Councilman Nary is asking a different question. The dark black line
needs to be built ultimately no matter what.
Nary: This diagonal one?
Watson: Yes.
Nary: It can't be built in the right-of-way? This is through an existing drain or something?
Watson: It's along an existing drain in a low spot.
Nary: Okay.
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 38
Watson: There was an alternative in your book that I think you got last month that had
the Black Cat Proper, which is the lightly shaded pink line in a right-of-way. It was option
five. So, there's two different things going on.
Nary: Okay. So, this black line needs to be built anyway. But you're saying and this isn't
going to be the same problem that we've had with these others, getting these
easements and all that? Or, you don't anticipate that?
Watson: Councilman Nary. It does need to be built.
De Weerd: The magic ball.
Watson: I'm not guaranteeing we won't have the same easement problems. But, we did
build in a cost for simply paying the appraised rate on the easements.
(inaudible discussion from audience)
De Weerd: Any other questions? Mr. Mayor?
Bird: I have none.
De Weerd: Yes sir. If you'll step forward and just give us your name for the record.
Janicek: Madam President, I'm Brad Janicek.
De Weerd: Hi Brad.
Janicek: (inaudible). What we're talking about here today is this red line here? Doing
this one here?
De Weerd: There are two options being discussed. Yes.
Janicek: What are the two options Brad? When you're talking about a right-of-way,
you're talking about this right-of-way up through here?
Watson: Right. We were talking about securing easements along Ten Mile Drain for
this. It's called the Ten Mile Diversion Trunk. Ultimately the Black Cat comes down
Black Cat to Franklin turns east and then ends up going through your property.
Janicek: But, what does the developer want to do? Specifically what is he proposing?
Watson: To my knowledge the developer hasn't proposed anything.
Smith: He hasn't proposed anything. That's just a study that was done to outline some
alternatives as to how that property could be served.
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 39
Janicek: When you say that property, you're talking about --?
Smith: This green and pink property.
Janicek: Okay. Can we get sewer here also at the same time?
Smith: Not off of this extension. I believe your property sewer comes off of this other
Black Cat Trunk.
Janicek: But, if they're going to have a forced line and they're going to peak from here
up to here or they're going to put this one in?
Smith: That's yet to be determined. That's what we're doing is just trying to study the
alternatives to see what the probable costs are or possible costs are so that the City can
make a decision as to which way to proceed.
Janicek: Well, the comment that was made about, well if they had service then they
probably would not pony up to go down the road. Is that for this (inaudible) right here?
Smith: If the only property that is serviced is this property that's colored, the pink and
the green, they can do that by constructing a lift station at Franklin and Ten Mile Road.
Then pumping it north into an existing gravity line.
Janicek: Into this one here?
Smith: Right. This is built. They would pump from this point north and dump it into a
gravity line. That would accomplish a sewer service for this property and that's all it
would serve.
Janicek: So, in other words, from this point here it would gravity to this point (inaudible)?
Smith: Right.
De Weerd: If they did it this other way, is that the line that's going to go down south,
south of the freeway?
Smith: It's part of it.
De Weerd: Oh.
Smith: The dry line that's built diagonally through that lower portion that's shaded pink is
part of the Black Cat Trunk and would extend on under the interstate to the southeast, it
would also extend to the northwest through Mr. Janicek's property over to Black Cat
Road ultimately.
Bird: Madam President.
I i
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 40
De Weerd: Mr. Bird.
Bird: With the Black Cat, this line has still got to be there doesn't it? Because there's no
way this can force down into the Black Cat when the Black Cat is in. it don't gravity
down this way does it? This line is part; this will be an extension of Black Cat.
Smith: We've got a drainage break here --
Bird: That's what I thought.
Smith: There's a break right here.
Bird: Yes. So, this is in here regardless. This is the planned Black Cat, right?
Smith: Black Cat Trunk, correct.
Bird: This is still going to be there regardless?
Smith: Correct.
Bird: That has to be there because this does not gravity flow down into this Black Cat?
Smith: Right.
Bird: How much more is it to do this? What I would like to know is how much more is it
to do the Black Cat down to this point period? From the top, not from the Ashford
Green's.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: Nine and a half million dollars?
Bird: How much?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Bird: That's more than we (inaudible).
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Bird: Nine and a half?
Haener: 7.3
Bird: 7.3 and is that from the permanent lift station up off of Ustick, north of Ustick?
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 41
De Weerd: That's putting in that lift station up here. Is that right?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Haener: It's actually option 3A. Pardon me. Option 3A would build the Ten Mile
Diversion trunk, Black Cat Road from Cherry Lane to the pump station. It would
construct the pump station and the force main to the treatment plant. (inaudible).
Bird: What (inaudible)? That's the 7.5?
Haener: No, this is the 7.32, okay? The additional cost for the Cherry Lane --.
Haener: (inaudible) is not in this draft report but I do have that number. I will get that
number to you.
Bird: At one time you gave us a complete cost out of our sewer system. (inaudible) for
an increase in the construction cost for the years.
Haener: Yes, we can get that number to Brad. Can I make a clarification real quick
about these two alternatives and the cost to the developer? In this case --. In the case
of the, where we're just going to have them perhaps build a pump station and a force
main, that is $375,000.00. If they do this option, then they still have to build their dry line
trunks and all these pipes in here. So, the total to the developer for this option would be
$1.38 million. Okay? If this is extended out here and they do not have to build this
$375,000.00 pump station and force main their cost is $1.19 million.
De Weerd: 1.19? So, it's less?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: Then they're building in this very part of this system.
Haener: Here's why it's less. Because their share of this is pro -rated. So, they only have
to pay (inaudible) percent of this cost. Five percent is less than the cost of building this
pump station (inaudible).
De Weerd: And bearing 100 percent of the cost?
Haener: Correct.
Janicek: Madam President.
De Weerd: Mr. Janicek.
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 42
Janicek: Can I ask another question? Well, has this got enough capacity here in this line
if they force it up to here?
Haener: Yes, from just this (inaudible). Correct.
Janicek: From just this?
Haener: Right.
De Weerd: But, then they're not developing anything further for any future expansion on
south?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: Mr. Allison.
Allison: Madam President.
De Weerd: Rich Allison.
Allison: My name is Rich Allison. Mr. Mayor, Council. We happen to have a number of
owners in that area that is conceived as the Black Cat trunkline, that there are
developers in place that would like to buy their property, develop the property. There's
currently no accessibility to sewer. That's where their problem is. In other words if you
took a look at the property owners on Black Cat itself and that general industrial zone
that runs along the railroad tracks and all of the additional properties that would be
developed by building the Black Cat trunkline, the total acreage is about 2,000 acres.
When you look at dividing that number into the 2,000 acres to build this, we're looking at
a far different situation. I think that's what should be looked at. Because this property is
ready to develop. The developers are there to buy the property as soon as the sewer is
available to serve the property. That's where our problem is now. I'm one of the owners
of the property here tonight.
L. Janicek: I have a stupid question. I'm Luann Janicek. I don't understand why in the
world, knowing that probably at some point Ten Mile is going to have an interchange
there would be service to one side of the road but not the other. Wouldn't there be there
need for service on both sides of Ten Mile Road as an off ramp there?
De Weerd: But, you can't ask that developer to develop sewer that wouldn't service him.
L. Janicek: Oh, no.
De Weerd: So, what he is doing is bringing the sewer here so that that property can
then take it further on down.
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 43
L. Janicek: Down this way. No, I wasn't asking this developer. I was just asking as a
comprehensive plan in full why it would not be considered that this should be done as
this.
De Weerd: Because you don't have a buyer paying for the portion to do that.
L. Janicek: In other words, this pink guy, whatever his name is out of Canada, East
Bourne, is willing to come up with the fees? 375,000, was his cost?
De Weerd: No, 1.19.
L. Janicek: 1.38? Okay.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
L. Janicek: So, the 375 was just the lift station?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Smith: The only thing we're trying to do here is just establish some estimate costs for
some different alternatives.
L. Janicek: So, do you understand my question then?
Corrie: It's not a stupid question.
De Weerd: Okay. Any questions, Council?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: Statements?
Haener: Thanks Madam President and Council.
Bird: Thank you.
De Weerd: Thank you. Well, we don't make any decisions at workshops. Thank God.
Thank you for that. Now, Gary what is the next step? Do you need us to schedule this at
another meeting? What kind of direction are you looking for from Council?
Smith: Well, I think we have a policy issue here that we need some direction on as to
what the Council would like to happen as far as development in this areas goes. That
would give us direction as to how to proceed in contacting property owners that are
interested in developing to see what financial interests there might be in building this
i
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 44
line. There's always, I think the real opportunity to have a partnership between the
public and the private entities in making construction projects like this go forward. I
think, utmost, up top is the policy of the Mayor and City Council as to how you want to
see development take place out here. You know this is really, I think it really points out
the need to look at the big picture as opposed to a development.
Bird: Madam Chairman. Gary and Brad, what I would like to see is a cost estimate. I
think we would be actually throwing money away if we don't come from this thing here
all the way down here. This has got to go in anyway. And get it down to the freeway at
this point, get our Ten Mile deal done with our fee implement, and partnerships and stuff
like that. See how we can do it. I think that, you know as well as I do, if we don't lay it,
permanent down through here and stuff, we'll be back digging it up when we do lay the
permanent Black Cat. That just gets us down into if we're going to do it for this one
development, I think you have to open up that whole area, Council. I firmly believe that.
I don't believe you just come in for this. At the same token maybe if we can open it up to
these other developers, for some of these other properties along that Ten Mile
exchange, maybe they can also come forward with some money for the exchange to
help us out. I would like to see what kind of a cost we're looking at. Include that pump
station and come back and get it down. We all know that there is already a plan,
developer driven that would do the north part of the Black Cat Trunk, pay for it right
now.
De Weerd: No, not right now.
Bird: No, but I said they would pay for it. Anyway, I think I would like to look at that
myself.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: Mr. Watson.
Watson: Madam President. One thing to point out to you is that this --. You'll note that
it's denoted as a semi-permanent. This option could be the permanent solution. Tim
took a lot of time to explore this so that it's an alternative to building that mile to mile and
a half of 42 inch main through developed subdivision between them. That's one thing to
keep in mind. It would certainly provide the cost for the whole Black Cat as was in the
master plan originally but this could be a permanent solution. The Black Cat can still go
down Black Cat, hit Franklin and get that property on the west side of Ten Mile Road.
No one is saying that that can't happen. We're just not studying that right now. The
alignment hasn't changed from the master plan. When you're looking at these
(inaudible) that could be a permanent solution.
De Weerd: It hasn't been further studied because the developer, the development or
applicant, potential applicant, whoever paid for this portion of this study. Is that correct?
t
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 45
Watson: Correct. We already have cost estimates, unfortunately they're not included in
this report for the Black Cat --.
De Weerd: In your total master plan?
Watson: Madam president permission?
De Weerd: Yes.
Haener: Just one thing about the alternative where you do a more or less permanent
pump station and force main. Of all the alternatives we looked at on a present year
basis, on a 50 year project life, it has the least (inaudible) cost of any of the alternatives
because we are able to delete that very deep gravity sewer in that existing road.
Bird: Come back and say that in laymen's terms.
Haener: Okay.
Bird: Okay, now. Is it going to be cheaper to do this?
Haener: It's going to be cheaper to do this than it is to build the gravity trunk.
Bird: This isn't a gravity trunk is it? This has got a pumping station?
Haener: Right. The gravity trunk from here to here, from this pump station (inaudible).
It's cheaper to build this one than it is to build this gravity trunk and this pump station.
De Weerd: So, will you --?
Smith: It transfers the flow, it transfers this flow. Instead of bringing the flow down Black
Cat, it transfers this flow over to another --.
Bird: Over to McDermott?
Haener: Actually --
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Haener: All of the flow that would normally go here would go here. The only thing that
we would have to do is down here where there was a trunk, let's say coming this way
from this gravity trunk (inaudible). On an overall project basis, including (inaudible) and
financing, going with a five foot deep 30 inch pipe instead of a 25 foot deep 42 inch pipe
is cheaper in the long run.
Bird: Okay. Let me ask you a question. If this is a 32 -inch, what do you do on
permanently?
i
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 46
Haener: The 9,000 is all you'll ever need according to the master plan.
Bird: No, we're going down with the Ten Mile?
Haener: This would drain into this pump station. Then you just build your gravity trunks
as shown in the master plan. This would be kind of the low point. Everything would drain
to there. Then you just simply pump to the (inaudible).
Bird: SO, what you're telling me is we don't really need this line other than for the north?
Haener: Right.
Bird: Why have we always been talking about big regional pump stations?
Haener: This is just an alternative that we --.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Smith: This proposal would carry the pressure on all the way to the plant but there is a
Nine Mile trunk that runs along here right now.
Bird: do we effect its capacity at all?
Smith: No.
Bird: This would just be a separate line?
Smith: Separate line all the way (inaudible).
Bird: So, this is it's own line? The only thing that we're --? Well, then how do we sewer
this Brad?
Watson: Councilman Bird. We would still need a lift station at the Five Mile. It would just
be a much, much smaller, permanent --.
Bird: So, we're just coming this way and then down --? Do we need the lift station
coming from the north?
Watson: Yes.
Bird: But, we would not need the big regional lift station?
De Weerd: Not a big one.
t
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 47
Watson: It would just be a small one. The disadvantage, there's two permanent lift
stations as opposed to one. When they did the master plan they tried to minimize the lift
stations.
Bird: Yes, I know that. Our best bet is just go on and run from there and leave this in,
cost wise and capacity wise?
Haener: Yes, capacity is the same either way. Cost wise, on an overall, life cycle project
cost, it's cheaper to run this pump station and construct a shallow pressure main rather
than a big deep.
De Weerd: Mr. Nary.
Nary: Thank you. I was just sitting here thinking it seems like we've run a little afield of
where we were. I mean, do we need to simply put it on a future agenda? This study, I
think Brad said a couple times, or Gary was over a particular property request that was
done. So, do we need to basically bring out master plan back along with this study and
say where do we go now? Is that kind of where we need to go next?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: That was good news.
Nary: Yes, it is.
Smith: I guess what we need to do, depending upon what the Mayor and Council wants
to do in terms of the sewer in this area, would be to generate some more costs to
include the rest of the Black Cat Trunk through Mr. Janicek's property.
Nary: I guess, for the two cents that it's worth, I would agree with Councilman Bird. I
think if we're going to do this, we need to do this to be able to serve the most number of
people. Obviously that's in the best interest of the City is to be able to create the most
number of people who will have access and be able to use it. We just need to figure out
where the money comes from and how do we phase that.
De Weerd: I don't know if you're going to open up a huge chunk like we're talking about
the White Drain by doing this. By going from here to the interstate.
Watson: Mr. Allison indicated 2,000 acres.
Allison: It was approximately 2,000 acres there by the Black Cat trunk and (inaudible).
Watson: The White Drain was three and a half sections.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 48
Smith: -- taken an inventory of all the property that Rich is referring to see how it plays
out. That's a big area.
De Weerd: But, if you're going to have an interchange, you're going to be expecting that
kind of growth.
Allison: Madam President, can I make one more comment?
De Weerd: If you come up here, I'll allow it.
Allison: One additional thing I was
which there's another trunkline that
which is a part of this Ten Mile trunk
*** End of Side Three ***
looking at when I was evaluating the whole thing
comes up here to Franklin and cuts over to here
This property in this location is worth just as much
Allison: -- this location which is equally valuable as this location. Upon the completion of
the Ten Mile interchange here should indicate a cost somewhere between $8.00 and
$10.00 a foot (inaudible). So, we're talking about a very substantial investment decision.
In addition, I mean, for this just to develop without the additional 300 acres of
commercial and the additional about 1700 acres of general industrial, which is the only
general industrial we have in the City of Meridian would be a great loss in revenue.
Bird: Thank you Rich.
De Weerd: Okay. We probably do want to bring this back. What's your pleasure
Council? When do you want to have this back on?
Bird: Madam President, I would like it on the next workshop if it's feasible to address it
and I also would like the costs to generate like the gentleman from JUB stated, to bring
the Black Cat line down to the interchange. I would like to see what that --. I don't think
that cost will be that much more, hopefully. That would open up all that property there.
De Weerd: So, bring it back on February 12tH ,
Bird: I would love to if you (inaudible).
De Weerd: Okay. Do you have any other thing you need us to answer?
Smith: On this topic? As I mentioned before that, that lift stations and collection systems
can be installed in pretty quick order compared to building up treatment facilities
(inaudible). So, we'll have to look at how fast the plant can expand for treatment versus
our construction of the White Drain, the construction of the North Slough, and the
construction of the Black Cat Trunk.
Meridian City Council Workshop
January 8, 2002
Page 49
De Weerd: Right.
Smith: It's a big impact.
De Weerd: February 12th, is that set enough time? At least to give us an update.
Smith: Enough time for JUB to look at the additional costs for extending the Black Cat
Trunk to the interstate.
De Weerd: Okay. Thank you.
Bird: Thank you guys very much.
E. Laptop Computers/Laser Fiche Project:
De Weerd: Well, Laptop computers.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: Do you have a PowerPoint presentation?
Berg: I wish I had the laptops. I guess all I can report on is the laptops are on order.
They're IBM. The LaserFiche program is on order. I haven't received either one so we
haven't gone any further except for as soon as we get them then we start programming
and testing. (inaudible) a low-key meeting or something of that nature to be the first run
to see how things go.
Bird: Training?
Berg: Yes.
Bird: I'll show you how to shut it down.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Berg: And we're looking to check out (inaudible).
De Weerd: When we get those in, then perhaps we can set a probably you won't be
doing training at a workshop. We can try and set, once we know, training schedule.
Berg: We could even set up individual training things of how to operate it --.
De Weerd: That would be preferred, wouldn't it?
Berg: Come on in on an individual basis. I mean some could be after work and some
could be during the day.
Meridian City Council Meeting
t
February -6_20132
Page 3 of 88
A. Approve minutes from November 8, 2001 Special Joint Meeting
with Ada County Commissioners / ACHD Commissioners:
B. Approve minutes from January 15, 2002 Regular City Council
Meeting:
C. Approve minutes from January 22, 2002 Regular City Council
Meeting:
D. Tabled from January 15, 2002: Five Mile Trunk Latecomer
Agreement:
E. Tabled from December 4, 2001: Order Granting Appeal: AP 01-
00 Stop Work Order at 2340 West Franklin Road by Walt Morrow:
F. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Approval:
VAR 01-012 Request for a Variance to the Landscape Ordinance
for Elixir Properties Subdivision by Paul Clayton - 521 North Eagle
Road:
G. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
01-028 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a fast food
restaurant with drive-thru in a C -G zone for proposed Wendy's by
Wenco, Inc. - northwest intersection of Corporate Drive and East
First Street:
H. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: AZ 01-
019 Request for annexation and zoning of 4.25 acres from RUT to
C -N zones for LDS Church by Larry Maurer - south of EastFranklin
Road and east of South Locust Grove:
I. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
01-038 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for the development
of an LDS Church in a C -N zone for LDS Church by Larry Maurer —
south of East Franklin Road and east of South Locust Grove Road:
J. Approve Application for Beer / Wine License by Donn Wilson for
MRPC Meridian LLC dba Whitewater Pizza and Pasta at 1510 N.
Eagle Road:
K. South Slough Sewer Temporary Construction Easement:
L. Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study - J -U -B Engineers:
M. Woodbridge Subdivision No. 2 Off -Site Water Line Project -
Agreement for Professional Services:
Meridian City Council Meeting
a
February 5, 2002
Page 4 of 88
N. Approve Bills:
O. Police Department Organization Plan:
Corrie: Item 3, is the consent agenda. I'd entertain a motion, then, for the consent
agenda.
Bird: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Bird.
Bird: I would move that we approve the consent agenda as noted on the Adoption of the
agenda with the changes.
McCandless: Second.
Corrie: Motion has been made and seconded to approve the consent agenda with the
corrections adopted from the agenda. Any further discussion?
Nary: Mr. Mayor?
Corrie: Mr. Nary.
Nary: I think Mr. Berg could just note for Item 3-A, the approval for the minutes of
November 8th, special joint meeting of the Ada County Commissioners, that I would
prefer to be listed as an abstention on that. I was not present at that meeting, nor a
member of the Council at that time.
Corrie: Okay. Any further discussion? Okay. Mr. Berg, roll call vote on the consent
agenda.
Role Call: Bird, aye; de Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Nary, aye.
Corrie: All ayes. Motion is carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Item 4: Department Reports:
A. Public Work's Department - Gary Smith / Brad Watson:
1. Request for water and sewer hookup for Shannon
Chaney at 2770 North Locust Grove Road:
Corrie: Item 4 is the Public Works Department. Gary Smith / Brad Watson.
Meridian City Council Workshop i'
March 12, 2002
Page 33 of 49
pre -Council. They occur in between the two meetings. That does give you some
flexibility because I've been involved in executive sessions that were slated for 20
minutes and wound up being seven or eight just because of time constraints. Having
those earlier is a good thing too.
De Weerd: Well, ours are only five minutes long.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Bird: (inaudible) we might say they're five minutes and five hours later when we come
out.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: Okay, if there's no further discussion on this lets move on.
Issue #7 Discussion of the Ten Mile Interchange Sewer Study — follow-up February
Workshop (Gary Smith and Brad Watson)
De Weerd: Issue No. 7 discussion of the Ten Mile interchange study. It's a follow up
from February to where Gary had mentioned that he would try to meet with the area
property owners and see if there's interest financially to help support this and give us a
sense of direction there.
Watson: President de Weerd, Mayor and Council Members. I wrote a little bit about this
in the written report for the fees that Gary passed out earlier. What we've done is had a
meeting with the engineers that were involved in that study from JUB, as well as what
they call their public involvement person. Her name is Candy Miller. She has experience
in property owner contact, easement acquisition, that sort of thing. We met with them
last Friday and discussed with here what we needed to do. In our mind there are those
three things on the second page that you instructed us to do, really its not something
that the staff has the expertise or time to do. The status right now is that they are
preparing a proposal. It's an addendum to the existing agreement and they are going to
bring that back to us next week. In the meantime they are putting together all the
property owner names, phone numbers, that sort of thing. Theory not just sitting around
(inaudible). They are pursuing this a little bit. The secondary part of this update involves
the actual study itself. As I said in that memo they've provided us this final draft, which
is kind of a --.
*** End of Side Two ***
Watson: -- section of final recommendations, at least what JUB understood the
discussion at those meetings to generally be directing us towards. Since those were
workshop meetings there was no motion. I haven't reviewed this in detail. I've read it
and I think they're on track. They want to wrap this study up and I'm sure Eastbourne
Meridian City Council Workshop °
March 12, 2002
Page 34 of 49
does too. The long and short of it is they're recommending the big option. If you recall
that's building the Ten Mile Diversion trunk. It's a very, very large semi-permanent lift
station and a portion of the Perdum Black Cat Trunk. If anyone wants to jump in and
correct me on any of this feel free. The other thing that I could do is copy off those
sections of this draft report and send them to all of you just to make sure that we're on
the same page as you if you want.
De Weerd: Brad, I think that's the direction that I remember us going. I think thought I
would like to see numbers and I know you had tentative numbers but budget wise. Is
this something that we can do with our budget up until we get further participation from
the area land owners? That's certainly a question that I've had.
Watson: Okay. Thank you Council Member, President de Weerd. That's what we want
to do. The only reason we're trying to separate these is that we have an existing
contract that's being reimbursed by Eastbourne, formerly via Dakota. We need to put a
seal on this and get it done so that we have a recommendation and we're sort of
entering a secondary phase of the project which is the property owner contact. I
understand your question fully though and we will --. I talked to JUB today. They intend -
-. Assuming we can bring this agreement to you — this agreement addendum to you
next week, they hope that by mid April they can have that information summarized and
back to you as far as participation. I've had some phone calls from people in that area.
They're very interested. I would be happy to answer any other questions if you have
any. I understand that you do want to see these summaries, or you do not?
De Weerd: Council, what's your preference?
Bird: I would like to see them.
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
De Weerd: Mayor?
(inaudible discussion amongst Council)
Watson: Understood.
De Weerd: Any questions, comments? Thanks.
Issue #8 Discussion on the Dust Abatement ordinance (Gary Smith)
De Weerd: Issue No. 8 discussion of the dust abatement ordinance. At our meeting last
month it was discussed for a brief moment and Gary was going to find out from
COMPASS what the time frame period was for the ordinance that they have been
working on.
LEGEND (1998 MODEL)
EXISTING FUTURE
--------- 1011
--------- 1211
_®®__®___ 15"
--------- 18"
--------- 2111
24"
--------- 2711
2000 1000 02000
SCALE: 1 "=2000'
--------- 30"
ADVANTAGES:
1) LEAST PRESENT WORTH COST
--------- 36„
SINCE IT ELIMINATES DEEP
TRUNK.
2) FORCE MAIN = LOW IMPACT VS.
--------- 42"
TRUNK CONSTRUCTION.
3) INFILL CAN OCCUR NOW.
PRESSURE
DISADVANTAGES:
1) REROUTE TRUNKS NORTH SINCE
01 DIVERSION
FORCE MAIN.
2) PUMP STATION OPERATION FOR
LIFE OF PROJECT.
A LIFT STATION
SERVICE AREA
7633 DISCHARGE LOCATION
LEGEND (10 -MILE STUDY)
I= EASTBOURNE PROPERTY
OTHER SUBJECT AREA PROPERTY
18"
TRUNKS TO CONSTRUCT RECR`ET
(WITH SIZE) FEB 12 200
"i 'a x.
FORCE MAINS TO CONSTRUCT; n- �- pie,
(WITH SIZE)
A LIFT STATION TO CONSTRUCT
(WITH SIZE)
CITY OF MERIDIAN
TEN -MILE INTERCHANGE SEWER STUDY
IGURE A-14 - REVISED PREFERRED ALTERNA IVE
•U•
F:\ProjectManagers\TJH\11757\11757—Dra\11757FIG14REVISED.dwg ---