Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-06-29 JointJune 19, 2009 MEMORANDUM TO: Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Meridian City Council FROM: Caleb Hood, Planning Manager CC: Meridian City Clerk Susan Slaughter Anna Canning RE: ACHD Cost Share Policy/Procedures Agenda Item for June 29th, 2009 Joint Meeting On May 27th, the ACHD adopted a Cost Share Policy (attached). According to ACHD Staff, the purpose of the Cost Share Policy is to: 1) Define the role of ACRD, cities, the county, urban renewal agencies and other potential partners in funding both transportation and "non -transportation" elements of ACHD's road projects; and, 2) Maintain flexibility for ACHD to consider unique features of projects and recognize the desires of the partnering agencies for roadway features within their boundaries. The primary purpose of the policy is to establish a clear and equitable system for ACHD to work with its partners to include features such as landscaping, specialized pavement treatments, decorative lighting, public art, and other aesthetic features outside the curb and beyond the transportation elements that are necessary for safety and mobility. As Staff, we have questions and concerns regarding this policy. In particular, we feel it is important to understand how ACHD envisions implementing this newly adopted policy and what the process for sharing the costs will be. A few of the questions for ACHD Staff and the Commission are: What will be constructed if the City does not participate in cost sharing? How will the Cost Share Policy be applied on roadways in the City's Area of Impact, but not yet annexed into the City? Through approval of the Cost Share Policy, ACHD determined that Idaho Code, Title 40, Chapter 14 and Title 40, Chapter 13, does not allow the District to incur any costs for "non -transportation" improvements. However, State Statue seems to put sole authority of ROW acquisition and costs with the county -wide highway district. The City questions Planning Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-884-5533. Fax 209 -99R -6R54 . www mPridianrity nry Page 2 whether these same State Statutes allow the City to expend funds that go towards the purchase of ROW and/or design and construction of improvements within the ROW. Is City participation and expenditure within the ROW limited to landscaping? The City questions whether State Statute limits the District's authority to those things explicitly listed in Idaho Code (e.g. — design, construction, maintenance of travel lanes, bike lanes and curbs, etc.), or instead lists them as minimum responsibilities of the District. Has ACHD Staff contacted the Attorney General's Office? The Policy seems to be written so that ACHD has the power to disregard other agency requested improvements. The City may view some roadway related features as publically necessary. How does ACHD envision proceeding with a project if ROW acquisition/negotiations (that will accommodate the City's "requested" improvement) breaks down with a private property owner? Will ACHD determine that City -requested improvements are publically necessary and exercise its power of eminent domain? Can ACHD Staff walk through a hypothetical project step-by-step to understand how the policy will be applied? Perhaps 30111 Street in Boise would be a good example? Similar to ACHD, the City sets and adheres to an annual budget. The timelines that ACHD has given to participate (or not) in a roadway project using the Cost Share Policy are not conducive to the budget process. Please explain how flexible this policy will be applied regarding agency participation. Page 3 3109.11 Project Cost Responsibilities ITEM ACHD COST PARTNERINGAGENCY' Design Standard Design Design of Amenities Right -of -Way Project specific design dimensions Extra Right of Way (ROW) for or Livable Street Design Guide basic amenities as outlined in policy, street section if typology adopted by including damages, buyouts ACHD and jurisdiction in Master and associated legal costs Street Map or ACHD Capital Improvement Plan -subject to public necessity requirements for eminent domain as set forth in the Idaho Constitution Art. I, § 13 and Idaho Code § 7-701 et seq. Through and Project specific design dimensions None Center Turn or Livable Street Design Guide Lanes, Curb and dimensions if typology adopted by Gutter, Utility ACHD and jurisdiction in Master Strip Street Map or ACHD Capital Improvements Plan Medians If needed for traffic safety & Upgraded hardscape or operations, with hardscape landscaping and irrigation if median is needed for traffic management. All ROW, construction, and maintenance if median is for aesthetics only Buffer Zone As specified in the Livable Street Landscape costs, construction Design Guide for the basic and ROW in excess of 6'; pedestrian zone; 6' ROW if perpetual maintenance of partnering agency chooses to landscaping landscape -subject to public necessity requirements for eminent domain as set forth in the Idaho Constitution Art. I, § 13 and Idaho Code § 7-701 et seg. Bike Lanes 5' unless constrained in a built Greater than 5' unless environment, then determined during otherwise specified in an project design adopted plan Sidewalks 5' Greater than 5' unless otherwise specified in an adopted plan On Street Parking ROW, design, construction and Dedicated by the partnering maintenance on ACHD arterial agency or developer for projects collectors and local roads. Dedicated by developer for arterials when required as a condition of development approval. Illumination Primarily of benefit to motorists Energy and Maintenance (lighting) costs, Pedestrian lighting