Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ - ACHD Draft Report 1 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 Development Services Department Project/File: Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 This is an annexation with rezone from RUT to R-4, and preliminary plat consisting of 31 single family lots and 6 common lots on 13.57-acres. Lead Agency: City of Meridian Site address: 2940, 3101, 3155 S Mesa Way Staff Approval: Applicant: Two C Development LLC Chris Findlay 5222 W Catalpa court Boise, ID 83703 Representative: Leavitt & Associates Engineers, Inc. Dan Lardie 1324 1st Street South Nampa, ID 83651 Staff Contact: Stacey Yarrington Phone: 387-6171 E-mail: syarrington@achdidaho.org A. Findings of Fact 1. Description of Application: The applicant is requesting approval of an annexation with rezone from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to R-4 (Medium low density Residential), and preliminary plat consisting of 31 single family lots and 6 common lots on 13.57-acres. The applicant’s proposal is consistent with the area. The City of Meridian’s Comprehensive plan designates this area as low density residential. 2. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: Direction Land Use Zoning North Rural Urban Transition (Ada County) RUT South Medium density Residential R-8 East Medium low density Residential R-4 West Medium low density Residential R-4 3. Site History: ACHD previously reviewed this site as MPP16-0030 in October 2016. The requirements of this staff report are consistent with those of the prior action. 4. Adjacent Development: The following developments are pending or underway in the vicinity of the site: 2 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 • Silverwater Subdivision, initially approved as the Cavanaugh Subdivision in October 2007 as a mixed use development consisting of 548 residential units and 13 commercial lots, is located directly south of the site and is in various stages of development. 5. Transit: Transit services are not available to serve this site. 6. New Center Lane Miles: The proposed development includes 0.27 centerline miles of new public road. 7. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. 8. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/ Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP): There are currently no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of the project that are currently in the Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP). • Victory Road and Bridge #1275 is scheduled in the IFYWP to be replaced/widened/built in 2018. • Victory Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes from SH-69/Meridian Road to Locust Grove Road between 2026 and 2030. • Victory Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes from Locust Grove Road to Eagle Road between 2021 and 2025. • The intersection of Victory Road and Locust Grove Road is listed in the CIP to be constructed as a multi-lane roundabout between 2021 and 2025. B. Traffic Findings for Consideration 1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 305 additional vehicle trips per day (29 existing); 32 additional vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak hour (3 existing), based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th edition. 2. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH) * Acceptable level of service for a two-lane minor arterial is “E” (575 VPH). 3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT) Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD’s most current traffic counts. • The average daily traffic count for Victory Road east of SH-69/Meridian Road was 6,374 on 10/31/2012. C. Findings for Consideration 1. Victory Road a. Existing Conditions: Victory Road is improved with 2-travel lanes, 25-feet of pavement, and no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. There is 58-feet of right-of-way for Victory Road (33-feet from centerline). Roadway Frontage Functional Classification PM Peak Hour Traffic Count PM Peak Hour Level of Service Existing Plus Project Victory Road 2,104-feet Minor Arterial 446 Better than “E” Better than “E” Mesa Way 815-feet Local N/A N/A N/A 3 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 b. Policy: Arterial Roadway Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Master Street Map and Typology Policy: District Policy 7205.5 states that the design of improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, including the Master Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide. The developer or engineer should contact the District before starting any design. Street Section and Right-of Way Width Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 & 7205.5.2 states that the standard 3-lane street section shall be 46-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within 70 feet of right-of-way. This width typically accommodates a single travel lane in each direction, a continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes. Right-of-Way Dedication: District Policy 7205.2 states that The District will provide compensation for additional right-of-way dedicated beyond the existing right-of-way along arterials listed as impact fee eligible in the adopted Capital Improvements Plan using available impact fee revenue in the Impact Fee Service Area. No compensation will be provided for right-of-way on an arterial that is not listed as impact fee eligible in the Capital Improvements Plan. The District may acquire additional right-of-way beyond the site-related needs to preserve a corridor for future capacity improvements, as provided in Section 7300. Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7205.5.7 requires a concrete sidewalk at least 5-feet wide to be constructed on both sides of all arterial streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District’s planter width policy if trees are to be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a minimum of 7-feet wide. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement. Frontage Improvements Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer shall widen the pavement to a minimum of 17-feet from centerline plus a 3-foot wide gravel shoulder adjacent to the entire site. Curb, gutter and additional pavement widening may be required (See Section 7205.5.5). Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items. ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map (MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway features required through development. This segment of Victory Road is designated in the MSM as a Residential Arterial with 3-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 49-foot street section within 75-feet of right-of-way. 4 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to dedicate 37.5-feet of right-of-way along Victory Road abutting the site. The applicant is proposing to improve Victory Road with 21- feet of pavement, vertical curb, gutter, 8-foot wide parkway strip, and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk abutting the site. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant’s proposal to dedicate 37.5-feet of right- of -way from centerline of Victory Road meets District policy and should be approved as proposed. Right-of-way dedication is impact fee eligible. The applicant should be required to widen the pavement of Victory Road to 17-feet of pavement from centerline; and construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk located a minimum of 31-feet from centerline of Victory Road abutting the site. The applicant should provide a permanent right-of-way easement for any public sidewalk placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. 2. Mesa Way a. Existing Conditions: Mesa Way is improved with 2-travel lanes, and no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. There is 50-feet of right-of-way for Mesa Way (25-feet from centerline). b. Policy: Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way widths for all local streets shall generally not be less than 50-feet wide and that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). The District will consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval. Standard Urban Local Street—36-foot to 33-foot Street Section and Right-of-way Policy: District Policy 7207.5.2 states that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section shall include curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot concrete sidewalks on both sides and shall typically be within 50-feet of right-of-way. The District will also consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval. Most often this width is a 33-foot street section (back-of-curb to back- of -curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete sidewalk is required on both sides of all local street, except those in rural developments with net densities of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street. Some local jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks. The sidewalk may be placed next to the back-of-curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least 8-feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the planting of trees in accordance with the District’s Tree Planting Policy. If no trees are to be planted in the parkway strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification, to reduce the width of the parkway strip. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. 5 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement. Half Street Policy: District Policy 7207.2.2 required improvements shall consist of pavement widening to one-half the required width, including curb, gutter and concrete sidewalk (minimum 5-feet), plus 12-feet of additional pavement widening beyond the centerline established for the street to provide an adequate roadway surface, with the pavement crowned at the ultimate centerline. A 3-foot wide gravel shoulder and a borrow ditch sized to accommodate the roadway storm runoff shall be constructed on the unimproved side. c. Applicant’s Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct Mesa Way as one-half of a 36-foot street section with curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide attached sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of-way abutting the site. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant’s proposal meets District policy and should be approved, as proposed. 3. Internal Streets a. Existing Conditions: Loggers Pass Street is stubbed at the site’s west property line. b. Policy: Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way widths for all local streets shall generally not be less than 50-feet wide and that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). The District will consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval. Standard Urban Local Street—36-foot to 33-foot Street Section and Right-of-way Policy: District Policy 7207.5.2 states that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section shall include curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot concrete sidewalks on both sides and shall typically be within 50-feet of right-of-way. The District will also consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval. Most often this width is a 33-foot street section (back-of-curb to back- of -curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. Continuation of Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.2.4 states that an existing street, or a street in an approved preliminary plat, which ends at a boundary of a proposed development shall be extended in that development. The extension shall include provisions for continuation of storm drainage facilities. Benefits of connectivity include but are not limited to the following: • Reduces vehicle miles traveled. • Increases pedestrian and bicycle connectivity. • Increases access for emergency services. • Reduces need for additional access points to the arterial street system • Promotes the efficient delivery of services including trash, mail and deliveries. • Promotes appropriate intra-neighborhood traffic circulation to schools, parks, neighborhood commercial centers, transit stops, etc. • Promotes orderly development. 6 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete sidewalk is required on both sides of all local street, except those in rural developments with net densities of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street. Some local jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks. The sidewalk may be placed next to the back-of-curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least 8-feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the planting of trees in accordance with the District’s Tree Planting Policy. If no trees are to be planted in the parkway strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification, to reduce the width of the parkway strip. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of -way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement. Cul-de-sac Streets Policy: District policy 7207.5.8 requires cul-de-sacs to be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet; in rural areas or for temporary cul-de-sacs the emergency service providers may require a greater radius. Landscape and parking islands may be constructed in turnarounds if a minimum 29-foot street section is constructed around the island. The pavement width shall be sufficient to allow the turning around of a standard AASHTO SU design vehicle without backing. The developer shall provide written approval from the appropriate fire department for this design element. The District will consider alternatives to the standard cul-de-sac turnaround on a case-by-case basis. This will be based on turning area, drainage, maintenance considerations and the written approval of the agency providing emergency fire service for the area where the development is located. Landscape Medians Policy: District policy 7207.5.16 states that landscape medians are permissible where adequate pavement width is provided on each side of the median to accommodate the travel lanes and where the following is provided: • The median is platted as right-of-way owned by ACHD. • The width of an island near an intersection is 12-feet maximum for a minimum distance of 150-feet. Beyond the 150-feet, the island may increase to a maximum width of 30-feet. • At an intersection that is signalized or is to be signalized in the future, the median width shall be reduced to accommodate the necessary turn lane storage and tapers. • The Developer or Homeowners Association shall apply for a license agreement if landscaping is to be placed within these medians. • The license agreement shall contain the District’s requirements of the developer including, but not limited to, a “hold harmless” clause; requirements for maintenance by the developer; liability insurance requirements; and restrictions. • Vertical curbs are required around the perimeter of any raised median. Gutters shall slope away from the curb to prevent ponding. c. Applicant’s Proposal: The applicant is proposing to extend Loggers Pass Street into the site and construct it as a 36-foot street section with curb, gutter, 8-foot wide parkway strip, within 50-feet of right-of-way; and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk within an easement. 7 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 Loggers Pass Street is proposed to terminate in a cul-de-sac located approximately 410-feet south of Novara Way. The applicant is proposing to construct Novara Way as a 36-foot street section with curb, gutter, 8-foot wide parkway strip, within 50-feet of right-of-way; and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk within an easement. The applicant is also proposing to construct a 10-foot wide by 65-foot long landscape median within 66-feet of right-of-way and a 52-foot street section at the entrance to Novara Way and Mesa Way. The travel lanes are 21-feet wide on each side of the median; and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk within an easement. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant’s proposal meets District policy and should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should provide a permanent easement for any public sidewalk located outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The applicant should construct Loggers Pass with a cul-de-sac, located 410-feet south of Mesa Way, with a minimum 45-foot turning radius. The applicant should be required to plat the landscape median on Novara Way as right-of-way owned by ACHD; and the Developer or Homeowners Association apply for a license agreement if landscaping is to be placed within the median. 4. Roadway Offsets a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing roadway offsets internal to the site. b. Policy: Local Offset Policy: District policy 7206.4.5, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 330-feet from a collector roadway (measured centerline to centerline). District policy 7207.4.2, requires local roadways to align or provide a minimum offset of 125- feet from any other street (measured centerline to centerline). c. Applicant’s Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a new local roadway, Novara Way, to intersect Mesa Way, approximately 575-feet north of Victory Road (measured centerline to centerline) in alignment with Novara Way directly to the east. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant’s proposal meets District policy and should be approved, as proposed. 5. Tree Planters Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District’s Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet. 6. Landscaping Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all public storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision triangle at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50-foot offset from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans. 8 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 7. Other Access Victory Road is classified as minor arterial roadway. Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to this roadway and should be noted on the final plat. D. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Dedicate 37.5-feet of right-of-way from centerline of Victory Road abutting the site. 2. Widen the pavement of Victory Road to 17-feet of pavement from centerline; and construct a 5- foot wide concrete sidewalk a minimum of 31-feet from centerline of Victory Road abutting the site. 3. Construct Mesa Way as one-half of a 36-foot street section with curb, gutter, and 8-foot wide planter strip within 50-feet of right-of-way; and detached 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk abutting the site. 4. Construct Loggers Pass Street and Novara Way as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter, and minimum 8-foot wide parkway strip within 50-feet of right-of-way; and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk, abutting the site. 5. Terminate Loggers Pass Street in a cul-de-sac located approximately 410-feet south of Novara Way with a minimum 45-foot turning radius. 6. Provide a permanent right-of-way easement for any public sidewalk located outside of the dedicated right-of-way. 7. Construct a 10-foot wide by 65-foot long landscape median within 73-feet of right-of-way and a 52-foot street section at the entrance to Novara Way and Mesa Way. The travel lanes are 21-feet wide on each side of the median; and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk within an easement. 8. Plat the landscape median on Novara Way as right-of-way owned by ACHD; and the Developer or Homeowners Association should apply for a license agreement if landscaping is to be placed within the median. 9. Construct a new local roadway, Novara Way, to intersect Mesa Way, approximately 575-feet north of Victory Road in alignment with Novara Way directly to the east. 10. Payment of impacts fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit. 11. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. E. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. All proposed irrigation facilities shall be located outside of the ACHD right-of -way (including all easements). Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right- of-way (including all easements). 2. Private Utilities including sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD right-of-way. 3. In accordance with District policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant’s engineer should provide documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review. 9 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 5. A license agreement and compliance with the District’s Tree Planter policy is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. 6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of -way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District’s Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy. 11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant’s authorized representative and an authorized representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from ACHD. 12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless a waiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission. F. Conclusions of Law 1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. G. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Utility Coordinating Council 4. Development Process Checklist 5. Appeal Guidelines 10 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 VICINITY MAP 11 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 SITE PLAN (part 1) 12 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 SITE PLAN (part 2) 13 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 Ada County Utility Coordinating Council Developer/Local Improvement District Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process. 1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination of utilities. 2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal, adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the plan review conference. 3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon. 4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless otherwise agreed upon. Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit iducc.com for e-mail notification information. 14 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 Development Process Checklist Items Completed to Date: Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD The ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review The Planning Review Section will do one of the following: Send a “No Review” letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at this time. Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. Items to be completed by Applicant: For ALL development applications, including those receiving a “No Review” letter: • The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.) • The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of- way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Construction (Non-Subdivisions) Driveway or Property Approach(s) • Submit a “Driveway Approach Request” form to ACHD Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a “Temporary Highway Use Permit Application” to ACHD Construction – Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50’ or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) Sediment & Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Construction Meeting an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plan, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Stormwater Section. Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling a Pre-Con. 15 Bannock Ridge/ MPP17-0011/ H-2017-0050 Request for Appeal of Staff Decision 1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the Development Services Manager when it is alleged that the Development Services Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The Development Services Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the Development Services Manager’s reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing.