Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDorothy Pefferle Email with Attachments - 4.191 Machelle Hill From:Bill Nary Sent:Wednesday, April 19, 2017 2:28 PM To:Dorothy Pefferle Cc:clerk Subject:RE: H-2017-0007 - Brian Porter, Applicant Thank you for providing your concerns. They will be part of the record for this application. As I told you yesterday, the Mayor and City Council cannot address your concerns except at the public hearing so they are unable to respond to your email other than to tell you that they received it. All your points will be addressed by the staff, the Commission, and the City Council at the appropriate time. Bill Nary | City Attorney & Risk Manager City of Meridian | City Attorney’s Office 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: | 208-898-5506 Built for Business, Designed for Living All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. From: Dorothy Pefferle [mailto:dp23485@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 2:00 PM To: Tammy de Weerd; Bill Nary; Keith Bird; Anne Little Roberts; Genesis Milam; Joe Borton; Luke Cavener; Trevor Palmer; clerk Subject: Fwd: H-2017-0007 - Brian Porter, Applicant Bill Nary, City Attorney, Mayor, City Council, City Clerk I am requesting the Planning and Zoning Commission vote NO on Rezone of 12.38 acres from R-4 to R-40 and NO on any and all rezoning requests or Conditional Use Permits in this matter for the following reasons: 1. I contacted the planning department and looked at zoning maps prior to purchasing my home in 2005. This parcel was designated R-4 Office. I was told by planning department there would be somewhere between 8 and 12 office buildings. That information is included in much information on the City of Meridian’s website. To me that is a Contract between the City and me when I purchased. If City approves the requests Applicant is making, I consider that a 2 breach of contract City had with Owners of Kelly Creek. (Unlike some owners, I was aware there would be apartments where Selway is located, as when I checked with the City prior to purchase, I was given that information. I do not oppose a reasonable amount of rental units in a residential community.) 2. Who is the City protecting – one developer who wants to change the zoning and all of the legal agreements the City has regarding this property – or the 372 Kelly Creek homeowners, as well as residents of many surrounding communities who will be negatively impacted by this arbitrary change of zoning and Conditional Use Permits? I would have never purchased my home had I known rental units were even being considered for the property at 2780 W. McMillan Road. Changing the facts after we purchase is not fair or honest. 3. This project, if approved goes against the City of Meridian’s own Comprehensive Plan, as posted online. The Comprehensive Plan States: Citizens affirmed that the goals, objective, and action items contained in this plan are based on seven KEY COMMUNITY VALUES: Obviously 80+ rental units at this location accomplish none of these goals, but would be just the opposite. Goals are: 1. Manage growth to achieve high-quality development. (Self-storage facility and 80+ units), two very dissimilar types of development on a single piece of property - not high quality development.) This developer says the proposed townhome units are exceptional quality. While the artistic drawings submitted are tastefully done, I have looked at pictures of a couple of their actual similar projects online, and they are high density, and bear no resemblance to the artistic drawings. 2. Enhance Meridian’s quality of life for all current and future residents. While the self- storage units may fulfill a need for some of the community, the 80 plus rental units would have a 3 negative effect on much of Northwest Meridian. While ACHD is of the opinion the roadways could handle this development, many not only Kelly Creek, but surrounding communities do not agree. It would make no sense to have over 250 rental units (likely between 500 and 750 occupants) using Apgar onto Goddard as the main access to the units. As occupants exit units, turning right takes them to a stop sign at corner of McMillan and W. Goddard Creek. This is a very dangerous intersection when turning left, as most do. It is poorly designed, and one needs to pull way out almost into the intersectio n to see around the utility boxes in order to watch for oncoming traffic. Our community had ACHD out to review the safety of that intersection, and they feel it is proper; many in our community feel it is just a matter of time until a tragic accident occurs there. Many many occupants of Selway avoid that dangerous intersection, and shoot across Apgar, run the stop sign at Apgar and Wild Goose near Kelly Creek Park (another poorly designed intersection) and speed past the 57 homes on Apgar to Linder where there is a light. Adding another 80 rental units that use these two access points would be a serious detriment to the surrounding communities, those who frequent Kelly Creek Park and devastating to the 57 homes on Apgar, 7 homes on Green Knoll, 7 homes on Pond Stone, 13 homes on Chimney Peak, 5 homes on Ballinger – or nearly 90 homeowners. Just because on paper a roadway appears to be adequate, common sense and safety issues should also be considered. One owner who lives on the corner of Apgar and Wild Goose has a lovely front porch, and has stated he will count as many as 30 cars running that stop sign within a short period of time. I see it frequently. A dangerous situation, and adding 80 more rental units using Apgar as access point is not acceptable from a public safety standpoint. 3. New growth should finance public service expansion. This project does nothing to accomplish this goal. 4. Prevent school overcrowding and enhance education services. Allowing the 80 plus units would be 100 percent in the opposite direction of this goal, and these units must not be allowed, as two or our schools are over capacity. Rocky Mountain High School has a capacity of 1800 students, and presently has 2312 students enrolled. They are in the process of bringing in two more portable classrooms. Sawtooth has a capacity of 1000, students, and has a present enrollment of 1080 students. Willow Creek is a newer school and school with a capacity of 650 students and an enrollment of 593 students. In Mr. Yochum’s letter as part of public record in this matter, he states new students may not be able to attend their neighborhood schools, and may need to be bussed. The school district is estimating the proposed 80 units would add 66 students to our neighborhood schools, two of which are already over capacity. This is not good for Meridian as a whole, as busing is expensive and it is in the best interest of all of Meridian if students can attend schools located in their 4 neighborhood. The proposed 80 units should be located in an area where there are new schools planned and busing would not be necessary. Homeowners prefer to purchase in a neighborhood where schools are not overcrowded. Approving this project could negatively affect homeowner prices in neighborhoods within these school boundaries. 5. Expand commercial and industrial development. This project does nothing to accomplish this goal. 6. Improve Transportation. This project does nothing to accomplish this goal. 7. Protect Meridian’s Self-Identity This project does nothing to accomplish this goal. It would do the opposite. If this project were to be approved, the ratio of single family homes to rental units would be approximately 60 percent single family homes to 40 percent rental units. That ratio is too high, and approving this project would violate the trust homeowners and taxpayers have in their Mayor, City Council, and Planning and Zoning Commission members. Independent studies have confirmed, and community realtors that are in the front lines of marketing our properties have stated, that single family homes located close to rental multi- family units experience reduced resale prices and lowered appreciation rates compared to single family homes located further away from apartment complexes. 5 Mr. Yochum, in his letter stating 66 students would be added to our schools, if this project were approved, also stated: The safety of our students is our first and foremost priority. With this in hand, we ask that you encourage your developer to provide safe walkways, bike paths, and pedestrian access for our students. When Locsha Falls Subdivision was approved, Willow Creek School was not yet built, and the developer was not required to provide a walkway on the west side of Goddard Creek/Long Lake, thus students needed to cross the very dangerous roundabout near Horse Loop, where a child was struck by a vehicle a few years ago and lost his life. The child happened to be living in Selway Apartments. A homeowner approached Kelly Creek HOA requesting we look into having a walkway built, as the roundabout is too dangerous for children to cross. Kelly Creek HOA approached Locsha Falls HOA, and also contacted ACHD. Both boards met with several departments of City of Meridian, and all stated there was no money available, nor was the project suitable for any grants, so it needed to be self-funded. Kelly Creek and Locsha Falls board reached out to Selway Apartments to share cost, as there are many children who reside in Selway who would benefit from the new walkway. While the local manager of Selway was very supportive, as she was manager there when the little boy lost his life, after several attempts to reach Selway corporate office, finally a two word reply was received: Not interested. The point of this is owners of rental units in a for-profit business, and are interested only in the bottom line, and have no interest in the community. It is natural and healthy for many residents of a community to feel they are part of the community. Selway residents (nothing wrong with it, I would do the same if I lived there) come to our events, use our private park and our many acres of common areas etc. As more persons use parks and common areas, playground equipment, more maintenance is necessary. Because we have between 12 and 15 acres of common area, much of it in grass, nearly 400 trees, a very large private park with playground, our landscaping costs are many thousands of dollars per year. About half of our owners are retirees, some on fixed incomes. This year it became necessary to raise dues to meet our expenses, in part because of self-funding the walkway to Willow Creek School. In the end Kelly Creek paid $7,500, Locsha Falls a bit more, and ACHD contributed between $5,000 and $6,000. Selway paid $0 thus their investors are getting a 'free ride' at community expense. In Brian Porter’s Application he touts that the apartments are a good fit for the neighborhood, as they are close to the three schools (two over capacity) close to Kelly Creek Park (private park paid for by Kelly Creek owners, free to investors of proposed rental units). It was reported that developer stated at March 16, 2017 Hearing (for which we cannot find anyone who received Notice) and at the December community meeting (where only one member of the community was present) that developer’s intention was to ‘knock down’ the center island and water feature at the Goddard Entrance to Kelly Creek and make it into a 6 parking lot. Kelly Creek spent $20,000 renovating our center island water feature and landscaping a few year ago, and our community is very proud of it, along with our flowers. Many in our Kelly Creek, after hearing developer’s statement were angered, as it demonstrates a complete lack of respect for our community. While I know the City has to consider any reasonable project that is submitted, I urge you to reject this one in the best interest of our beautiful City of Meridian and its residents. I understand the owner of the parcel has every right to develop the land; however, please be patient and wait for a project to come along that will be an asset to our community and all of Meridian. We purchased our homes knowing offices would be there, and businesses become a viable part of the community. Our neighborhood participates in National Night Out, and it is a large event. To keep costs down, many of the local businesses (75 last year) donate wonderful items for our raffle (Homestead Grill donated and cooked for us last year), the local nail salons, dental offices, UPS Store, many many business that are a part of our community generously support us. Please do not approve this development, but wait for a project whose intentions would be to become part of and share a responsibility in our community. NO MORE RENTAL UNITS. ANY APPLICATION APPROVED FOR THIS PARCEL OF LAND MUST HAVE PRIMARY ACCESS FROM MC MILLAN. Thank you for your time and consideration. Dorothy Pefferle 2613 W. Cedar Grove Street