Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLetter for Reconsideration SEP-20-2004 23:41 LAND CONSULTANTS INC FILE No.CO1 oe..-17 '04 16'25 ID:SPIN< BU1l..ER, LLP 208 938 5873 P.02/03 FA)(:2("" ~e 1001 PAGE 2.; 3 JOA... c. BuTL.. M. .....00"'" Ih-.R"" L4".". MAIEA$ R""."L~S". ",CHAE" ,. !I~I"~ (208) 1188.10.99 JBUTLIIII@O.,..TT"..""".C:ON September 17. 2004 VIA FACSJMILI: ønd U.S. Man RECEIVED SEP 2 1 2004 Mayor Tammy de Weer<! City Council City ofM.e:ridian 33 E. Idaho Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 City of Meridian City Clerk Office Re: LeI!$hire SubdivisioJl, AZ 04-017, PP 04-624, CUP 04-026 Dear Mayor de W~d: This letlef constitutes B requesl for reconsiderationlcJa:rificanOl1 of the decision made by the Meridian City Council with. respect to the case refefenced above on September 7, 2004, :Because r underst2llld the City ofMer:ldian ¡:Ioes no! have a codified procœure for reconsideration we are rel}ing em Robert' 6 Rules of Order for this process, per Steve Siddoway's direction. 2S1 E. l'AONT"""Oc:1" .......- AO.e""..... 110""_0837'" 11 is vt:ry likely that all putìes would benefit from a clear statement of the decision from the City Council. Becauae the decision of the Council W24 not thoroughly discussed, the basis for denial of the applications is !mclcar. A1:conJing to Idaho Code 67-6519: 4, Whmtever a govemiog board or zoning or plœng and zoning commÍ$SÏon gr.ant3 or denies a pernút, it shall. specify; (a) The ordÎD8l1ce aM standards used in cva!lIating the application¡ (b) The reasoœ for approval ordctña!; and (c) The actions, if any tha¡ the applicant could take 10 obtain a pennit. In this public hearing, mm)'issucs were disçussec!, however, none: of the above were oonsidered or addressed as a finding for thII decision. Obviously, t!lle developer is disappointed with the decisioll and would welcome ¡he opportunity to make necesll&IY modi.fIça ions 10 the plat in order to aJfgn this project with the City's VÎ9Ïon fot its fÏ1ture. ~Os.38B.1000 2<18_(") ---- SEf'-21!-2BB4 23: 32 SEP 21 '04 11:36 2BB32æ7B6 97"- 21218 938 5873 P.132 PAGE. 02 SEP-20-2004 23:42 LAND CONSULTANTS INC FILE ~lo,OOl 09-1.7 '04 16;25 ID:SPIN!< BUTLER, LLP 208 938 5873 .~.0~:,03 FAX:2r' <!88 1001 PAGE 3/ 3 '- ,~ Sop!o!lIIbet 17,2004 Page 2 I understand that the Findings IIfld Conclusions for denial of these appl1eations are 10 come before rbe Council on September 28, 2004, Ifneccssary. plaue incluðÐ this let!llr in the packet for that meeting. Our client has contacted Keith Bird, who voted in f&vor oflast week's motion, to request that he bring ÙlÍ6 matrer before the ço¡mcj to consider the appropriateness of a request for reconsideration at this tir¡le. Very truly yolllB, d 0 It"" taJ........ loAM C. Butler lCB/gs cc; Barry Teppola SEP 21 '0411:36 2089385873 TOTAL P.03 P",r..¡o "'" SEP-20-2004 23:41 LAND CONSULTANTS I NC 208 938 5873 52 N, 2nd Slleet Eagle, Idaho 83616 Office- 208.938.3812 Fax - 208-938-5873 EmaiJ: shawn@Jandconsul1ants.net I Land Consultants me. ¡ Fax To: Jessica from: Shawn L. NICkel fax: 888-4218 Pages: 3 (including cover page) Ph- Date: 9/2112004 Re: Leeshlre Sub Request for Reconsideration cc: ¡;::¡Urgent DFor RevIew 0 PI88Se Cemment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle Jessica, Here is a copy of the letter from Joanne BuDer to the City Council for the requested reconsideration for Leeshire Sub. Please have Will or yourself call me to confirm a date for this action. Thanks for y~r help. Shawn SEP 21 '04 11:36 208 938 5873 PAGE,01 P.01/03