HomeMy WebLinkAboutMittleider Rezone
RZ 04-010
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING
APPLICANT Leon Smith
August 19,2004
ITEM NO.
10
REQUESf Public Hearing: Rezone of .68 acre from R-4 to O-T zone for Mittleider --
125 West Cherry Lane and 1645 West 1 st Street
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
See attached Staff comme~ (J
Q!t~~~
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
No Comment
No Comment
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
No Comment
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
Staff Initials:
if\~
Pone: <'/)~amlO~l{)
OTHER: -ï:c affidavit of ~osling
Contacted: ' ~) )"^"{~
Emailed:
Date: <&n -DV\
Materials presented at pubDc meetings shall become properly of Ihe COy of Meridian.
¡
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
clfe~;dl(;rn
CITY HALL
(208) 888-4433 - Fax 887-4813
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
William LM. Na.¡y
Shaun Wardle
Charles M. Rountree
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDJNG DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211- Fax 898-9551
IDAHO
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 - FAX 466-4405
STAFF REPORT:
P&Z Hearing Date: August 19, 2004
Transmittal Date: August 13, 2004
To:
Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer ~
Craig Hood, Associate City Planner (IN
RECEIVED
AUG 1 3 2004
From:
Subject:
Mittleider Rezone
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
.
Request to Rezone 0.68 Acres from R-4 to O-T (Old Town) by Novella Mittleider,
Janice Mittleider and Leon Smith (File #RZ-O4-010)
We have reviewed the above-mentioned submittal and offer the foDowing comments, as
conditions of the applicant. These conditions shaD be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicants, Novella Mittleider, Janice Mittleider and Leon Smith, have requested a rezone of 0.68
acres from R-4 (Residential) to 0- T (Old Town). The subject property includes 4 original lots of
record (minus right-of-way acquired by ACHD) in Wilson Addition Subdivision, recorded in 1948.
There are currently two single-family homes on the subject site. The site is located on the south side of
Cherry Lane, approximately 320 feet west of Meridian Road, between West 1st Street and West 2nd
Street.
Due to high traffic volumes and other similar commercial development in the area, the applicant is
requesting that the subject property be zoned 0- T. The applicant states, in the submittal letter, that the
subject property would be better suited for a dentist office than the current residential uses. With the
application, the applicant has provided a conceptual site plan of how this site may re-develop with a
dentist office/clinic type use. According to current City Code, professional and sales offices as well as
clinics require Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval in the proposed 0- T zone (MCC-II-8-1).
It appears that the legal description submitted with the application is accurate and meets the
requirements of the City of Meridian and the State Tax Commission. If the property is rezoned to O-T,
the subject lot would conform to the minimum lot size and minimum frontage requirements of the
zone.
RZ-O4-OlO
Mittleider Rezone.RZ.doc
Mayor, Council, and P&Z Commission
Hearing Date: August 19, 2004
Page 2
StqfJis recommending approval of the subject rezone request to O-T, with the conditions outlined in
this report.
LOCATION
The subject property is located.on the south side of Cherry Lane, approximately 320 feet west of
Meridian Road, between West I st Street and West 2nd Street, in Section 12, Township 3 North, Range I
West.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North - Horse pasture, zoned RUT (Ada County)
South - Single-family homes (Wilson Addition Subdivision), zoned R-4
East - Single-family homes (Wilson Addition Subdivision), zoned R-4
West - Church, zoned R-4
OWNERS OF RECORD
The property owners of record are Leon Smith, Janice Mittleider Smith and Novella Mittleider, who
have all provided notarized consent for the subject application.
ANNEXATION & ZONING ANALYSIS
According to Ordinance II-IS-II, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both the
P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances of each
proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence
answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment."
The following is the list of stand¡¡rds found in 11-15-11 and analysis by staff:
A.
Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan
and, if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment;
The 2002 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates the east half of the subject
property as "Old Town" and the west half of the property as "Medium Density Residential". In
Chapter VII of the Comprehensive Plan, Old Town uses will include offices, retail and lodging,
theatres, restaurants, and service retail for surrounding residents and visitors. Staff finds that the
requested O-T zoning generally conforms to this stated purpose and intent of the Old Town
designation. Please see Special Considerations for Rezone below for further analysis of the
proposed zoning designation and the existing Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
designation of this property.
Staff finds the following Goals, Objectives, and Action items contained in the 2002
Comprehensive Plan to be applicable to this application (staff analysis is in italics below
policy):
. "Restrict curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets." (Chapter VII, Goal
IV, Objective D, Action item 2)
RZ-O4-01O
MittJeider.RZ.doc
Mayor, Council, and P&Z Commission
Hearing Date: August 19,2004
Page 3
On the submitted conceptual plan. the applicant is proposing direct access to Cherry Lane.
This site has frontage on not only Cherry Lane, but also West 1st Street and West 2nd Street.
Therefore, staff recommends that direct access to Cherry Lane be restricted. See Special
Considerations for Rezone below for further analysis.
. "Require appropriate landscape and buffers along transportation corridors (setback,
vegetation, low walls, berms, etc.)." (Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action item 4)
An appropriate landscape buffer along Cherry Lane will be required by the City when an
application for a CUP/CZC is submitted.
.
"Locate new community commercial areas on arterials or collectors near residential areas in
such a way as to complement with adjoining residential areas." (Chapter VII, Goal I,
Objective B, Action item 5)
The subject property has frontage on Cherry Lane, an arterial roadway. Staff believes that
the conversion of this property from residential to office will compliment the existing
residential uses/structures in the area if designed properly.
.
"Require all commercial businesses to install and maintain landscaping." (Chapter V, Goal
III, Objective D, Action item 5)
The applicant is not specifically proposing to install any landscaping with the subject
annexation application. Staff is including a condition requiring the applicant to submit for
a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) which, when processed, will require the applicant to
construct landscaping along Cherry Lane and the perimeter of the site.
Staff finds that the new zoning to O-T should be harmonious with and in accordance
with the Comprehensive Plan. Please see Special Considerations for Rezone below for
further analysis.
B.
Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the future;
Staff does not anticipate that the applicant intends to rezone the subject property in the future.
C.
Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the fashion that
would be allowed under the new zoning - for example, a .residential area turning into
commercial area by means of conditional use permits;
In the applicant's submittal letter, it is stated that the subject property is intended to be used for
dental office purposes. Currently, the only (principally) permitted uses in the O-T zone are
single-family homes, libraries, churches, and museums. All other uses in the O-T zone, that are
not prohibited, require separate Conditional Use Permit approval.
D.
Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area
should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been
RZ-O4-010
Mittleider.RZ.doc
Mayor, Council, and P&Z Commission
Hearing Date: August 19, 2004
Page 4
developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the
proposed rezone area;
The general vicinity of this project is changing rapidly. In this area there are several other
parcels that have/are/will be converting from residential to office and commercial uses. On the
north side of Cherry Lane, between Meridian Road and Linder Road, and along Main Street,
there are many sites that have converted to office and commercial uses. Due to increasing
traffic volumes on Cherry Lane, staff believes that the use of this property for residential
purposes is not the best use of the land. Although Cherry Lane has not been widened recently,
it is currently a 5-lane roadway (center turn lane), with curb, gutter and sidewalk in this area.
Staff fmds that rezoning this site to 0- T is consistent with other land uses and facility changes
in the area.
E.
WiD the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be
harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the
general vicinity and that such use wiD not change the essential character of the same area;
The applicant is not proposing a specific use or building design with this application. Staff
finds that the anticipated office/clinic use if designed, constructed and operated in accordance
with adopted city ordinances, through a future CUP/CZC application(s), should be harmonious
and appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the vicinity.
F.
WiD the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring
uses;
Staff finds that the use of this site for professional office/clinic purposes should not be
hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses if all development and
landscaping ordinances are exercised. The Commission and Council should rely on public
testimony to determine whether the proposed 0- T zoning will be disturbing or hazardous to the
neighboring residential, quasi-public, and/or commercial uses.
G.
Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as
highways, streets, police and fIfe protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water,
sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment
shall be able to provide adequately any of such services;
All essential public facilities and City services listed above currently serve this site, however,
upgrading may be necessary to provide a level of service different from a residential use. Staff
finds that the current configuration of Cherry Lane, and the anticipated widening of Meridian
Road in this area should be adequate to serve this site into the future.
On July 23, 2004, a joint agency/department comments meeting was held with representatives
of key service providers to this property. The Meridian Fire Department has concems with
serviceability of this site as an office/clinic, as the fire hydrants near this site may not be
located in accordance with the International Fire Code (all of the detailed conditions from the
Fire Department and other agencies/departments are at the end of this report).
RZ-O4-OlO
Mittleider.RZ.doc
Mayor, Council, and P&Z Commission
Hearing Date: August 19, 2004
Page 5
The Commission and Council should reference any written or verbal testimony submitted by
the Meridian Police Department, and any other agency providing service to this site, regarding
their ability to adequately service this project.
Staff finds that the property proposed for rezone can be served adequately by all essential
public facilities and services.
H.
Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and
services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community;
Staff finds that changing the zoning of this site will not cause excessive additional requirements
at public cost. Other required site improvements will be funded and constructed by the
developer through the CUP/CZC process. Staff also finds that the rezoning of this site to 0- T
will not be detrimental to the community's economic welfare.
I.
Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and
conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general
welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
The applicant is not proposing a specific use for this property at this time. It is anticipated that a
professional office(s) or dental/medical clinic(s) may be constructed on this site in the future.
Staff finds that an office/clinic type use will create additional traffic on adjacent arterial roads.
Further, the parking and maneuvering of cars on the site may generate additional noise for
surrounding properties. However, staff does not believe that the additional noise should be
excessive. Staff does not anticipate an office/clinic use will create excessive smoke, fumes,
glare, or odors that will be detrimental to any person, property or the general welfare of the
area. To ensure this finding, all future uses on this site will be required to go through the
Conditional Use Permit and/or Certificate of Zoning Compliance process and will be subject to
compliance with City Code.
J.
Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not
to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets;
Future vehicular access points to Cherry Lane, West 1st Street, and West 2nd Street should
comply with ACHD policies. In order to preserve the capacity and movement on Cherry Lane,
staff recommends that vehicular approaches to Cherry Lane be prohibited and access to this site
be provided from West 1st Street and West 2nd Street. If a vehicular approach is approved to the
site that is designed and constructed in accordance with ACHD policies, staff finds that the
approach(es) will not create an interference with traffic on the surrounding public street(s).
Please see Special Considerations below and review any comments from ACHD for additional
information regarding this finding.
K.
Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major
importance; and
RZ-O4-OlO
Mittleider.RZ.doc
Mayor, Council, and P&Z Commission
Hearing Date: August 19, 2004
Page 6
Staff is not aware of any natural or scenic feature(s) that would be lost, damaged or destroyed
by allowing this site to be rezoned and developed with office/clinic uses. Any existing trees
larger than 4" caliper that are removed shall be mitigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance.
L.
Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian. (Ord. 592,
11-17-1992)"
For the reasons listed in the fmdings aboye, staff fmds that the rezoning of this property
would be in the best interest of the City.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR REZONE
1. Proposed O-T Zone: As noted at the beginning of this report, the subject property is
composed of four platted lots of record. The two eastern lots (Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Wilson
Addition Subdivision) lie within the Old Town designation on the Comprehensive Plan Future
Land Use Map. The two western lots (Lots I and 2, Block 2, Wilson Addition Subdivision)
are designated Medium Density Residential on the Future Land Use Map. Staff is
recommending that all of the subject property be zoned O-T, as requested, for the following
reasons:
. The applicant is proposing to develop all four lots together;
. The western lots have frontage on Cherry Lane, an arterial roadway;
. The western lots are directly adjacent to properties designated "Old Town" on the Future
Land Use Map;
. and, the internal circulation flow, visibility into the site, and fire access are improved by
allowing all of the site to develop with office/clinic type uses.
This recommendation will cause the limits of the O-T district to expand along Cherry Lane.
2.
Conceptual Site Plan/Future Uses: With the rezone application the applicant has submitted a
conceptual site plan, as requested by staff. The site plan shows two 3,256 square foot
buildings, 28 parking spaces and shared drive aisles.
In the applicant's submittal letter it is stated that this site would be suited well for a dentist
office. As noted in the fmdings above, staff is supportive of office/clinic type uses on this
site. With the adjacent residential uses to the south, staff does not believe that
commercial/retail type uses are appropriate in this location. Therefore, staff recommends that
the developer enter into a DeveloPment Agreement with the City. restricting retail
commercial uses on this site.
Landscaping: Meridian City Code 12-13-10-4 requires a 25-foot wide landscape buffer on
this section of Cherry Lane. Meridian City Code 12-13-10-4 also requires a 10-foot wide
landscape buffer on local streets (West I" Street and West 2nd Street). The landscape buffer
widths adjacent to streets must be located outside of the right-of-way and do not include the
width of the sidewalk (MCC 12-13-10-2). Meridian City Code 12-13-12 requires buffers
between different land uses. According to MCC 12-13-12-4 a 20-foot wide landscape buffer
will be required along the south property line. Although no landscaping will be required with
RZ-04-01O
Mittleider.RZ.doc
Mayor, Council, and P&Z Commission
Hearing Date: August 19,2004
Page 7
the subject rezone application, staff would like to make the applicant aware of the current
landscaping requirements.
The submitted 8 lh" by II" site plan submitted by the applicant is not approved with the
subject application. Modifications to the site plan and improvements to the property,
including but not limited to landscaping, access, parking and drive aisle improvements, and
Fire Department improvements will be required with a CUP/CZC application.
3. Access: The existing home on Lots 1 and 2 currently takes access to Cherry Lane. Access to
the existing home on Lots 3 and 4 is currently proyided from West 1st Street. The submitted
conceptual site plan shows a curb cut on Cherry Lane in the middle of the subject site with
3,256 square foot buildings on either side. Curb cuts to both West 1st Street and West 2nd
Street are also shown near the south property lines. ACHD has also commented that the
depicted access point to Cherry Lane does not meet their policy for location. Because access
to Cherry Lane does not meet ACHD policy and there is sufficient room to access this site
from the local streets, staff is recommending that direct access to Cherry Lane be prohibited
for the subject property. In order to ensure that this access restriction is maintained. staff is
recommending that the applicant enter into a development agreement with the Citv.
4. Sanitarv sewer & water service: The existing homes located within the subject annexation
are currently being served by the City of Meridian's sanitary sewer and water systems,
however, upgrading may be necessary to provide a level of service different from a
residential use. The applicant will be responsible for all costs associated with the service
upgrade.
ANNEXATION AND ZONING SITE-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND COMMENTS
1. The submitted legal description appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State
Tax Commission and will place the parcel contiguous to existing city limits.
2. The subject property is within the Urban Services Planning Area.
3. All future development of the subject property shall be constructed in accordance with City of
Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development.
4. Prior to the rezone ordinance approval, a Development Agreement (DA) shall be entered into
between the City of Meridian and the property owners. The DA shall require that:
. Retail commercial uses (e.g. - convenience stores, service stations, bars, restaurants,
retail stores, sales lots, etc.) are prohibited on this site.
. Access to Cherry Lane is prohibited. Access to this site will be provided from West 1st
Street and West 2nd Street with cross-access between all of the lots.
. The applicant will be responsible for all costs associated with the sewer and water service
upgrade.
. Any other conditions desired by the Commission and Council.
RZ-O4-010
Mittleider.RZ.doc
Mayor, Council, and P&Z Commission
Hearing Date: August 19, 2004
Page 8
5. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed
from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are available
from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape
irrigation.
OTHER AGENCYIDEP ARTMENT COMMENTS/CONDITIONS
MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS/CONDITIONS (RZ-O4-O10)
1. Provide fife hydrant spacing per the International Fire Code. Commercial and office
occupancies will require a fire-flow consistent with the International Fire Code to service the
proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 300' apart.
a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 Ih" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle.
b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it.
c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works specs.
d. Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted red 10' to each side of the
hydrant location.
Fire Hydrants shall be placed on comers.
Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'.
e.
f.
2.
All future entrance and internal roads/fife lanes shall have a turiring radius of 28' inside and
48' outside.
3.
Maintain a separation of 5' between future buildings and dumpster enclosures.
4.
All processes & storage practices shall be required to comply with the International Fire Code.
5.
Provide exterior egress lighting as required by the International Building & Fire Codes.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the requested rezone of the subject property to an O-T zone, with the
aforementioned conditions included in a Development Agreement.
RZ-04-0JO
Mittleider.RZ.doc
Jul 29 04 03:05p
SMITH L BEEKS
208 733-6688
p.2
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
CITY OF MERIDIAN - PLANNING AND ZONING
STATE OF IDAHO
County of Ada
)
) ss.
)
WAYNE MITTLEIDER, being first duly sworn on oath deposes
and states:
2.
1.
Acting as an agent for Janice Mittleider and Leon
E. Smith, wife and husband, posted the property
located at 125 West Cherry Lane, owned by Janice
Mittleider and Leon E- Smith. The posting took
place not less than 10 days prior to the public
hearing scheduled on August 19, 2004, at 7:00 p-m-
The posting contained the names of Janice
Mittleider and Leon E. Smith, the time and place of
the public hearing and the description of the
zoning amendment being~p ied for, to-wit:
changing from R-4 to Offi - Old Towne.
Attached to this Aff~$ft of~sting is a
photograph taken on ~.~ ,2004, of the
Notice placed upon the property located at 125 West
Cherry Lane, showing the sign situated on the
property in plain view of passing traffic which
sign will and is intended to remain on the property
until the hearing date of August 19, 2004-
Further your affiant saye
DATED this ~ day of
, 2001.
to before me a notary public for
, 2004-
/'
~u, c~ u~ U~:05p
SMITH I. BEEKS
208 733-6698
p.l
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
CITY OF MERIDIAN - PLANNING AND ZONING
STATE OF IDAHO
County of Ada
)
) ss.
)
WAYNE MITTLEIDER, being first duly SWorn on oath deposes
and states:
2.
1.
- Acting as an agent for Novella Mittleider, posted
the property located at 1649 West First Street,
owned by Novella Mittleider. The posting took
place not less than 10 days prior to the public
hearing scheduled on August 19, 2004, at 7:00 p.m.
The posting contained the name of Novella
Mittleider, the time and place of the public
hearing and the description of the zoning amendment
being applied for, to-wff: changing from R-4 to
Office - Old Towne. ~
Attached to this Aff~~iJt of~sting is a
photograph taken on ~~, 2004, of the
Notice placed upon the property located at 1649
West First Street, showing the sign situated on the
property in plain view of passing traffic which
sign will remain posted on the property and is
intended to remain on the property until the
hearing dale of August 19, 2004.
Further your affiant sayeth naught.
DATED this ;) AJø day of
to before me a notary public for
~
~
~
,',-~
~~
~
"
~
.......
~
~
L.I~
11\
'"
. ",e>
Ada County Highway District
John S. Franden, President
David E. Wynkoop 1st Vice President
Susan S. Eastlake, 2nd Vice President
Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner
Dave Bivens, Commissioner
3775 N. Adams Street
Garden City ID 83714-6499
Phone (208) 387-6100
FAX (208) 387-6391
E-mail: tellus@ACHD.ada.id.us
August 10,2004
To:
Novella Mittleider
1649 West 1st Street
Meridian Idaho 83642
RECEIVED
AUG 1 3 2004
Subject:
MRZ04-010
125 Cherry Lane and 1645 West 1st Street
Rezone
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
On August 3, 2004, the Ada County Highway District acted on your application for the above
referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and
street improvements, which are required.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 208-387-6177.
Sincer¡W1 / /J ! A /' dJz.ff~
AndrtJrfuWU
Principal Development Analyst
Right-of-way & Development Services
Planning Division
cc:
Project file, Construction Services, Drainage, Utilities
City of Meridian
hl~
g/¡g-{)<1
SiV\/\ ~(L 1 D
......;'-'r-.,
~ Ada County Highway District
Right-of Way & Development Department
Planning Review Division
This application does not require Commission action and is approved at the staff level on Tuesday August 3,
2004. Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant on Friday July 30, 2004. Please refer to the
attachment for appeal guidelines. Staff contact: Andrea N. Tuning, 208-387-6177-phone, 208-387-6393-fax,
atunina@achd.ada.id.us
File Numbers:
MRZO4-Ð10 - Rezone
Site address:
125 West Cherry Lane and 1645 West 1st Street
Owners/Applicants:
Novella Mittleider
1649 West 1st Street
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Janice Mittleider and Leon Smith
1381 Galena Drive
Twin Falls, Idaho 83301
Application Information:
The applicant has submitted a rezone application to the City of Meridian requesting a rezone to O-T from R-
4. The site is 0.68-acres and is located on the south side of Cherry Lane between West 1 st Street and West
2nd Street.
Acreage:
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
0.68-acres
R-4
O-T
Vicinity Map
A.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
2
Findings of Fact
Trip GeneratIon: This development is estimated to generate 236 additional vehicle trips per day (20
existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual.
Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of a building
permit. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that
time.
Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was not required with this application.
Site Information: The site currently has two existing single-family dwellings.
Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
a. North: Fairview Avenue and an 18.49 acre parcel with a single-family dwelling (RUT)
b. South: 0.19 and 0.19-acre parcels with single-family residences (R-4)
c. East: 0.17-acre parcel with a single-family dwelling (R-4)
d. West: 7.23-acre site with a church located on it
Impacted Roadways
Cherrv Lane:
Frontage: 255-feet
Functional Street Classification: Principal Arterial
Traffic count: West of Meridian Road 21,030 on 5-2-00
Level of Service: Better than C
Speed limit: 35 MPH
"-An acceptable Level of Service for this segment of Cherry Lane is 0 (up to 33. 000 VTPD)
West 1 'I Street:
Frontage:
Functional Street Classification:
Traffic count:
Speed limit:
West 2nd Street:
Frontage:
Functional Street Classification:
Traffic count:
120-feet
Commercial Street
A traffic count is unavailable in this location. Traffic on West 1 ,t
Street is estimated to be under the threshold established by
District policy.
20 MPH
Speed limit:
120-feet
Commercial Street
A traffic count is unavailable in this location. Traffic on West 1 st
Street is estimated to be under the threshold established by
District policy.
20 MPH
Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site
Cherry Lane is cuITently improved with 5-traffic lanes with vertical curb, gutter and 9-foot concrete
sidewalk abutting the site.
West 1s1 Street is currently improved with 32-feet of pavement with no curb gutter or sidewalk abutting
the site.
West 2nd Street is currently improved with 45-feet of pavement with no curb, gutter or sidewalk
abutting the site. There is vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting the property to the west. The
existing church located to the west utilizes the right-of-way for parallel parking and the pavement is
striped to reflect this use.
8.
9.
B.
Existing Right-ot-Way
Cherry Lane currently has a total of 82-feet of right-of-way (42-feet from centerline).
West 1 st Street currently has a total of 60-feet of right-of-way (3D-feet from centerline).
West 2nd Street currently has a total of 60-feet of right-of-way (3D-feet from centerline).
Existing Access to the Site
The site currently has two driveways that intersect West 1s1 Street and one driveway that intersects
Cherry Lane.
The site has an existing horse shoe type driveway that consists of 12-foot wide driveways that
intersect West 1 st Street approximately 20-feet south of Cherry Lane and 1 DO-feet south of Cherry
Lane. This horseshoe driveway currently serves the existing single-family dwelling that is located at
1645 West 1st Street.
The site has an existing 20-foot wide driveway that intersects Cherry Lane approximately 85-feet east
of West 2nd Street.
10.
Site History
The District has not previously reviewed a development application for this site.
11.
Capital Improvements PlanlFive Year Work Program
This segment of Cherry Lane is not included in the District's Five Year Work Program or Capital
Improvements Plan.
Findings for Consideration
This application is for a rezone only. Listed below are some of the policies that apply to the
conceptual site plan that has been submitted. Upon the receipt of a development application
the District may require additional Findings of Consideration and Conditions of Approval that
apply to the review of future development applications.
1.
Right-ot-Way and Sidewalk- Cherry Lane
District policy requires 96-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of-way
allows for the construction of a 5-lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot concrete detached sidewalks
and bike lanes.
District policy requires 5-foot wide (minimum) concrete sidewalk on all arterial streets.
2.
Cherry Lane is currently improved with 5-traffic lanes with vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk. This
segment of Cherry Lane is not included in the District's Five Year Work Program or Capital
Improvements Plan to be widened. Due to the fact that Cherry Lane is already fully improved and is
not anticipated to be widened in the future, the applicant should not be required to dedicate any
additional right-of-way or construct any additional improvements on Cherry Lane.
Street Sections - West 1st Street and West 2nd Street
District policy 7202.8 and 72-F1 B, requires roadways abutting commercial developments to be
constructed as a 40-foot street section with curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk within 54-feet of
right-of-way.
The applicant should construct West 1 st Street as one half of a 40-foot street section with vertical
curb, gutter and sidewalk within the existing right-of-way.
3
4
3.
The applicant should construct West 2nd Street as one half of a 40-foot street section with vertical
curb, gutter and sidewalk within the existing right-of-way.
DrIveways
Driveways on Fairview Avenue
District policy 72-F5, requires driveways located on collector or arterial roadways with a speed limit of
35 to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveway.
District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over 1,000 vehicles
to a maximum width of 36-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb-cut type
facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for
driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways.
The applicant is proposing to construct a 3D-foot wide shared curb return type driveway on Fairview
Avenue that is located approximately 125-feet west of West 1st Street. District policy restricts access
to Fairview Avenue to provide the safest and most efficient transportation system possible.
Furthermore, District policy requires driveways on roadways with a speed limit of 35 MPH to offset
any driveway or street a minimum of 150-feet. The applicants proposed driveway location is not
approved with this application.
Driveways on West 1st Street and West Z'd Street
District policy F2-F4 (1) and 72-F4 (2), requires driveways located on commercial/industrial roadways
to offset a controlled and/or uncontrolled intersection a minimum of 50-feet (measured near edge to
near edge).
District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over 1,000 vehicles
to a maximum width of 36-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb-cut type
facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for
driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways.
The applicant is proposing to construct a 25-foot wide curb return type driveway that intersects West
1st Street approximately 90-feet south of Cherry Lane. This driveway width and location meets
District policy and should be approved with this application.
The applicant is proposing to construct a 25-foot wide curb return type driveway that intersects West
2nd Street approximately 90-feet south of Cherry Lane. This driveway width and location meets
District policy and should be approved with this application.
All Driveways
Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked
onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant should be required to
pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the
roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
4.
Other Access
Cherry Lane is currently classified as a principal arterial. Access to arterial roadways is restricted.
There are no access points to Cherry Lane that have been approved.
C.
Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1.
Construct West 1st Street as one half of a 40-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk
within the existing right-of-way.
Construct West 2nd Street as one half of a 40-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk
within the existing right-of-way.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
D.
2.
3.
4.
Construct a 24 to 3D-foot wide curb return type driveway that intersects West 1st Street approximately
90-feet south of Cherry Lane, as proposed. This driveway width and location meets District policy
and should be approved with this application.
Construct a 24 to 30-foot wide curb return type driveway that intersects West 2nd Street approximately
90-feet south of Cherry Lane, as proposed.
Pave the driveways their full width and at least 3D-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of
the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
Standard Conditions of Approval
1.
Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
5.
Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details.
All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State
of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
6.
The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or
other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
7.
Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements
of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
8.
Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with
Ordinance #198, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
9.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant
shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking
ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in
the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction.
No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative
of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written
confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
10.
11.
Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other
5
regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises
the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiverlvariance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the
time the change in use is sought.
E.
Conclusions of Law
1.
The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are
satisfied.
2.
ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development.
Attachments
1.
2.
3.
Vicinity Map
Site Plan
Appeal Guidelines
6
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
1.
Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the
final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not
properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error
of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or
enforcement ofthe ACHD Policy Manual.
a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged
the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs.
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary
of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the
decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision
being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state
the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions
of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a
written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of
appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of
the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such
time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify
the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the
decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing
on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant. the hearing of the appeal
will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held
within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's
reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal
and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the
hearing.
e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or
reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being
appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at
the hearing.
7
8
II
Development Process Checklist
II
I8ISubmit a development application 10 a City or 10 the County
I8IThe City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
I8IThe ACHD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review
I8IThe Planning Review Division will do one of the following:
OSend a "Na Review" letter 10 the applicant stating that there are no site specific requiraments at this time.
OSend a "Comply With" letter 10 the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part of
a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also appl'
to this development application.
OWrite a Staff level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating thE
proposal for its confonnance 10 District Policy.
OWrite a Cammisslan level report analyzing the Impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its confonnance to District Policy.
OThe Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commlsslan level reports.
OFor All development applications, Including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter:
The applicant should submit two (2) sets of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Develapment Revlll1ll
Dlvlslan for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: If there are no site improvements required by ACHD,
then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of Impact fee calculation.)
The applicant is required 10 get a pennit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-()f-way, includin¡
but not limited 10, driveway approaches, street Improvements and utility cuts.
OPay Impact Fees prior 10 Issuance of building pennit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER:
Consfruction (Zone)
0 Driveway or Property Approach(s)
Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" fonn to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by
Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week tumaround for this approval.
0 Working In the ACHD Right-of-Way
Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Pennit Application" to
ACHD Construction - Pennils along with:
a) Traffic Control Plan
b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, If trench is >50' or you are
placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Consfruction (Subdivisions)
0 Sediment & Erosion Submittal
At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan
Designer, must be tumed into ACHD Construction - Subdivision to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Drainage
Division.
0 Idaho Power Campany
Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPeO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled.
0 Final Approval fram Develapment Services
ACHD Construction - Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling a Pre-Con.
9
Figure I
~
~(ì
~()
~z
~~
~11
-I
c
Þ.
r
( )
-I
m
11
r
Þ.
z
-
---
'"
~
~
<;
SECOND STREET
I.
i
1
t
Ib
~
I ~
;¡¡
r
Ii
r
.
Ii
t=- ---
-
""JOØ"
, , , , , , , , ,
mLl _L LLLU__U
@
'"lI"(J
"~""
~~"5
;:;Z¡i!~
~ "
. '"
"
'"
õ' ..
.., '"
.. Ð
!5 ~
~
m
-'"
r
0
--I
r
0
--I
r
0
--I
.....
r
0
--I
...
~~t!!!
~~"5
;:~i!~
~ "
. '"
"
'"
II' ..
!5 ~
~ ~
'"
@
r 0--' T r-o ,-
i : : i i ¡ ;
0........
:¡;
~
FIRST STREET
-----I
---
-I
4Ø'-Ø"
r
m
.G'
"'J:>.
~r
ZtJ
~m
{JI( )
go
~;:{
~=¡j
-/
0
Z
-(
'"
()
I
m
ïO
ïO
-<
Ir
I~
08/17/2004 09:10 FAX 2088886654 MERIDIAN P&Z DEPT. .. City Clerk
SMITH. BEEKS 208 733-6688
~002
p.2
?t-í- ~
~J~q-oV\
MQ.NY'- ,Ùö. ¡ 0
RECEIVED
AUG 1 6 2004
RESPONSE TO STAFF REPORT
da~ed August 13, 2004
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
TO:
MAYOR, CITY COUNCTL AND ?LANNXNG AND ZONING COMMISSION
FROM:
LEON E. SMITE:
APPLIANTS:SMITH, MITTLEIDER AND NOVELLA MITTL~IDER
SUBJECT:
MITTLEIDER RE-ZONB-.5S ACRES FROM R-4 to O-T
FILE NO.: RZ-04-010
This is a response to the Staff Report dated August 13,
2004, on the subject properties described above. Applicants have
reviewed the Staff Report and, by general response, accept the
data, arlalysis and recommendation set forth therein-
Applicants have two issues of disagreement with the
recommendations for the four lots, which arc accepted in ~his
application. The two recommendations in the Staff Report occur
at "J" on page five and "Special Considerations for Re-Zone on
page 6." Taking the two articles in that order, we respond as
follows:
"J" - "Staff :!:"ecornmends that vehicular approaches co Cherry
Lane be prohibited and access~o chis site be provided from West:
First Street and West Second Street ..." Applic::a,.,ts presently
have an access off Cherry Lane to the residential property
loc::ated at 125 West Cherry Lane. PreSently, applicants are
considering a professional building or buildings loc::ated on the
four lots described in the application. If the final plan
submitted to the c::ity for a conditional use permit includes only
one building centered in the four lots, the access off Cherry
Lane will not be warranted or desired. However, in the event a
two building development i.. considered, it may be necessary for
proper land usage that an access off Cherry Lane be applied for.
Applicant reali2es that ACED wants to eliminate the existing
access and that the Staff Report recommends elimination of Cherry
Lane access. Applicant is reluctant to agree to that condicion
at this time, but applicant is very aware that any conditional
use permit may require no ac~ess to CherrY Lan~.
"(2) Meridian City Code 12-13-10-4 requires a 25'
landscaping buffer on Cherry Lane ... and a 20' wide landscape
buffer required on the south property line - " This much
landscaping is virtually impossible to accommodate on a 150' lot.
That takes 45' off of the lot thereby eliminating use of all Lhac
property for building and parking. It only leaves a strip of
115' to work with. Albeit, this application does not require
RESPONSE TO STAFF REPORT - 1
AUG 17 '1214 1219:32
2088886854
PAGE. 02
08/17/2004 09:11 FAX 2088886854 MERIDIAN P&Z DEPT. .. City Clerk
D2.'D5p SMITH & BEEKS 2D8733-6688
Rug 16 D4
acquiescence to that much landscaping, applicant just desires
that it be made known that applicant would object to this much
landscaping required on the' final conditional use application-
variance from that section of the city code will be applied for
when the conditional use permit is fil
'g
EON E. SMITH for Applicants
Leon E. Smith, Janice Mittleider
and ~ovella Mittleider
RESPONSE TO STAPF REPORT - 2
AUG 17 '04 09:32
2088885854
IaJ 003
p.3
A
PAGE. 03
08/17/2004 09:10 FAX 2088886854 MERIDIAN P&Z DEPT. .. CIty Clerk
Au~ 16 04 02:04p SMITH & BEEKS 20S 733-668B
~001
p.l
Smith & Beeks
'C'~'.
""""9" we...
2IUSi.ar,A""". û'"
l"""Éw,8<>:<SO8
'¡welL frJ!., MoJi. 8~~O3-0508
"\
r."",~. Smith,fr.
P..JU ~rW
Al.1gust 16, 2004
(208) 733.6684
7."(208) 733-6G88
Via Facsimile: 208/886-6854
Craig Hood
Meridian Planning and Zoning
Re: Mittleider Re-Zone
DeaL' Craig:
Please give a copy of the attached Response to Staff Repor~ to
the City Cl"1'.k.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
LES/dlm
!::I'lc.losure
RUG 17 '04 09:31
2088886854
PRGE.01
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Shoun Wardle
Wilham L. M. Nary
Charies M. Rountree
Keith Bird
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 . FAX 466-4405
PARKS & RECREATION
(208) 888-3579. Fax 898-5501
PUBLJC WORKS
(208) 898~5500' Fax 887~1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887~2211 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNJNG & ZONING
(208) 884-5533 . Fax 888~6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: August 12, 2004
Transmittal Date: July 7, 2004 Hearing Date: August 19, 2004
File No.: RZ 04-010
Request: Rezone of .68 acre from R-4 to 0- T zone for Mittleider Rezone
By: Leon Smith
Location of Property or Project:
125 West Cherry Lane and 1645 West 1st Street
K
David Zaremba, P/Z (No FP)
David Moe, P/Z (NoFP)
Wendy Newton-Huckabay, P/Z (No FP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (NoFP)
Keith Borup, P/Z (NoFP)
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
Bill Nary, C/C
Charlie Rountree, C/C
Keith Bird, C/C
Shaun Wardle, C/C
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR. VAG. FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attomey
Cityi;:ngineer
City1~lanm~r:
Parks Department
Meridian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FPIPP only)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig~ District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (FPIPP only)
Qwest (FPIPP only)
Intermountain Gas (FPIPP only)
Bureau of Reclamation (FPIPP only)
Idaho Transportation Department (No FP)
Ada County Land Records
Meridian Development Corporation
Historical Preservation Commission
'~r
),.." ..;I'!!
Your Concise Remarks:
.,.-
" ~l
~r"
,. ,.
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 . (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-42J8 . Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 . Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
RECEIVED
JUL 2 2 2004
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
~&~1~'Z)~
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
tÐJuly, 2004
phones: Areo Code 208
OFFICE: Nompo 466-7861
SHOP: Nompo 466.0663
William G. Berg Ir.
City Clerk
RE:
RZ 04-010/MittIeider;
Dear Will:
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the above referenced
application for Rezone of .68 acre from R-4 to 0- T zone for Mittleider Rezone.
Thank you,
A4V/~
Bí11 Henson
Asst. Water Superintendent
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
BH/dbg
c:
Water Superintendent
File - Office/Shop
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABlE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHT5 . 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
MAYOR
Tammy de Weerd
~"
clfe;;dl;~
ID.~HO
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 466-9272 . FAX 466-44()5
PARKS & RECREATION
(208) 888-3579. Fax 898-5501
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500. Fax 887-1297
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Shoun Wardle
Willi"m L. M. Nary
Charles M. Rountree
Keith Bird
~¡
I'
j/
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING & ZONING
(208) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: August 12,2004
Transmittal Date: July 7, 2004 Hearing Date: August 19, 2004
File No.: RZ 04-010
Request: Rezone of .68 acre from R-4 to 0- T zone for Mittleider Rezone
By: Leon Smith
Location of Property or Project:
125 West Cherry Lane and 1645 West 1st Street
David Zaremba, P/Z (No FP)
David Moe, P/Z (No FP)
Wendy Newton-Huckabay, P/Z (NoFP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (NoFP)
Keith Borup, P/Z (No FP)
Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
Bill Nal)l, CIC
Charlie Rountree, CIC
Keith Bird, CIC
Shaun Wardle, CIC
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanital)l Service (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department
Fire Deparlment
Police Department
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Meridian School District (No FP)
Meridian Post Office (FP/PP only)
Ada County Highway District
Ada County Development Services
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig- District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power CO. (FP/PP only)
Qwest (FP/PP only)
Intermountain Gas (FP/PPonfy)
Bureau of Reclamation (FP/PPonly)
Idaho Transportation Department (No FP)
Ada County Land Records
Meridian Development Corporation
Historical Preservation Commission
Your Concise Remarks:
~L1n,~! A1 ~
7/1/dðt!f
x
R,E~ ,F; .rVI:;11m
. .-'- h -C.i ..1
jUl I 2 2004
City OfMeridiac
City Clerk Offic~
33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 . (208) 888-4433
City Clerk Ollice Fax (208) 888-42J8 . Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 . Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PUBLIC HEARING
SIGN-UP SHEET
August 19, 2004
ITEM #
11
DATE
PROJECT NUMBER
RZ 04-010
PROJECT NAME
Mittleider Rezone
NAME (PLEASE PRINT) FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL
L.eø//1 >t41 I~ ~
Nof/--el/c;r rv(,-tt{-e~J.ev- c---