Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 19, 2004 P&Z Minutes Meridian Planning & Zoning Commiaalon August 19, 2004 Page 3 of 82 that's Resolution 206. The next packet you have from the clerk's office is listed as agenda item number five and that has the proposed resolution that the city would adopt to amend that - the resolution and you see what the City Council saw the other night and that's two pages of changes. So, what happened was because it was hard to reference with the rest of Resolution 206 which follows it, I went and typed the whole thing in for you, so that it makes sense as a whole and that you would have the whole document together. Does that make sense? I guess the basic thing is you don't need to look at the thing that's marked as item five. If you look at the other one that has the page one through eight of eight, that will be enough. Is that clear as mud? Okay. I just Newton-Huckabay: The page one through eight of eight is this packet or -- Canning: The memo to Will. The thing that says Will Berg at the top, look at that one. You don't really need to look at this one. It's all pretty much duplicate - duplicated or it's just legal mumbo jumbo. Sorry, Chris Gabbert. Commissioner Moo, did you have a question or you were just following along with me? Moe: I'm right here with you. Canning: Okay. There you go. Okay. That was all I wanted to say, other than that Tara is - we would like to give it a test run with having Tara doing the timing tonight, if that's okay with the Commission. And thars all I'll trouble you with tonight, unless you have questions. Borup: Any questions at this point, Commissioners? Thank you. Item 5: Recommendation: VAC 04-005 Request for a Vacation of side yard utility and irrigation easements on Lots 43-45, and Lots 88-91, Block 23, Ashford Greens Subdivision No.2 by Brighton Corporation - east of North Black Cat Road and south of West Ustick Road: Borup: Okay. The next item is a request for vacation. It's VAC 04-005, a request for a vacation of the side yard utility and irrigation easements on Lots 43 to 45 and Lots 88 to 91, Block 23, Ashford Greens Subdivision No.2 by Brighton Corporation. Again, this would be - irs not a Public Hearing, it would be a recommendation from the Commission, but we would like to start with the staff report. Zaremba: Mr. Chairman and Craig, may I interrupt for a minute? I would just comment for the record that I live in Ashford Greens Subdivision. I believe I'm in a different phase than the one thars in discussion tonight. I have no financial interest in the outcome of the decision tonight and I live far enough away from - Ashford Greens is a very large subdivision and I live far enough away from this that I would not even receive the required homeowners notice, so my assumption is that if the legal counsel will make a ruling, I don't believe I have any conflict of interest in discussing this one. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commiaalon August 19. 2004 Page 4 of 82 Gabbert: Chairman, Members of the Commission, I think the disclosure and if you feel you can adequately proceed and take part in the proceedings that will cover you. Zaremba: Thank you. Hood: Mr. Chair, Commissioners, the requested vacation affects seven lots in Ashford Greens Subdivision No.2. Like Commissioner Zaremba stated, there are several phases of Ashford Greens. It's generally located south of Ustick Road and east of Black Cat Road. Just briefly I will show you the site that - the affected lots. What the applicant is trying to accomplish is with the four platted lots, construct three buildings with the three platted lots on the left-hand side of the plat thafs before you, construct two lots, so we need to vacate the easements that run along the side lot lines of those, so the buildings will overlap those platted lot lines. With that I will stand for any questions. This is just a recommendation, as the Chair stated, and ifs a recommendation to the City Council. Do you have any questions? Rohm: Yes. My only question would be is are any of those easements occupied by any utility currently? Hood: Mr. Chair, Commissioner Rohm, the applicant has provided notarized consent from all of the public utilities, including the City of Meridian Public Works Department, to vacate those easements. So, no one has facilities. We do have all of those. I just -- I did make that a condition of approval just to double-check that anyone that may have - there is new utilities, it seems like, all the time, so everyone that I had listed as a public utility, they have submitted their consent. I will double-check and just make sure that anyone with an interest has provided that and they don't have any facilities within those. Rohm: Okay. Thank you. Borup: Okay. Anyone else? Maybe just for - and I think this may be -- might be something come up in the future, but, Bruce, at present construction aren't all utilities in the front easement anyway and do we even have any utilities, other than an irrigation - I mean there are no utility easements along side of the back property lines anymore, are there? Freckleton: Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission, 99.9 percent of the subdivisions going in our joint utility trench is in the front like you stated. Pressurized irrigation typically will follow the back lot line around. Services from the different utilities, gas, power, telephone, typically will run up those sides, so I have always kind of been under the impression that thafs why the side yard easements remain is so that they are covered for service lines to the structures. Borup: That part makes sense. recommendation? Okay. Commissioners, do we have a Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2004 Page 5 of 82 Zaremba: Mr. Chairman, I move we forward to the City Council recommending approval of VAC 04-005, request for a vacation of side yard utility and irrigation easements on Lots 43 through 45 and Lots 88 through 91, Block 23, Ashford Greens Subdivision No.2 by Woodside Properties, LLC, east of North Black Cat Road and south of West Ustick Road, to include all staff comments of their memo for the hearing date of August 19th, 2004, received by the city clerk August 13, 2004. Moo: Second. Borup: Motion and second. All in favor? Any opposed? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 6: Item 7: Public Hearing: AZ 04-005 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 5.27 acres from RUT to R-8 zone for Packard Acres Subdivision No.3 by Packard Estates Development, LLC - east of North Locust Grove and south of East Ustick Road: Public Hearing: PP 04-006 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 22 single-family residential building lots and 1 common lot on 5.273 acres in a proposed R-8 zone for Packard Acres Subdivision No.3 by Packard Estates Development, LLC - east of North Locust Grove and south of East Ustick Road: Borup: Okay. Our next item is six and seven, Packard Estates Subdivision, have been re-noticed due to a redesign of the plat, I believe. It's re-noticed to September 16th. So, I don't know if anyone is here for Packard Estates, but we will not be hearing that tonight and notification has gone out for the September 16th meeting. September 16th. Item 8: Item 9: Item 10: Public Hearing: AZ 04-016 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 39 +/- acres from RUT to proposed R-4 and L-O zones for proposed Strada Bellissima Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. - northwest comer of West Victory Road and South Highway 69 (MeridianlKuna Highway): Public Hearing: PP 04-022 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 70 residential and 12 office building lots and 10 other lots on 39 +/- acres in a proposed R-4 and L-O zones for proposed Strada Bellissima Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. - northwest comer of West Victory Road and South Highway 69 (MeridlanlKuna Highway): Public Hearing: CUP 04-024 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development for single-family dwellings with attached garage and office buildings in a proposed R-4 and L-O zones for proposed Strada Bellissima Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. - northwest comer of West Victory Road and South Highway 69 (Meridian/Kuna Highway):