Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLarry Knopp CUP =- CUP 04-019 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING APPLICANT Larry Knopp ITEM NO. 8 REQUESf Public Hearing: Conditional Use Permit for retail and professional office use in an existing building in the proposed O-T zone for Larry Knopp July 15, 2004 AGENCY COMMENTS ,""~'~"' CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY See attached Staff Comments CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: No Comment ~V1õkQðv~ kD6f. ~t 6) JiJLf L1~ CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: See attached Comments See attached Comments IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: contacted:~~Af\úH Emailed: Date:~ Staff Initials: Phone:'~<7 o~lL{f1- Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. MAYOR Tammy de Weerd CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Shaun Wardle William L M, Nary Charles M, Rountree Keith Bird LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 . FAX 466-4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579' Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208) 898-5500. Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)887-2211'Fax887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: July 8, 2004 Transmittal Date: June 16, 2004 File No.: CUP 04-019 Request: Conditional Use Permit for a retail and professional office use in an existing building in the O-T zone for Larry Knopp By: Larry Knopp Location of Property or Project: Hearing Date: July 15, 2004 713 N. Meridian Road David Zaremba, P/Z (No FP) David Moe, PIZ (No FP) Wendy Newton-Huckabay, P/Z (NoFP) Michael Rohm, P/Z (No FP) Keith Borup, PIZ (No FP) Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Bill Nary, CIC Charlie Rountree, CIC Keith Bird, CIC Shaun Wardle, CIC Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAG, FP) Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department &. Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FPIPPonfy) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power CO. (FPIPP only) Qwest (FPIPP only) Intermountain Gas (FPIPPonly) Bureau of Reclamation (FPIPPonly) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County Land Records Meridian Development Corporation Historical Preservation Commission Your Concise Remarks: '{ i , ',,'. ,!: ,HPAS:r1pAH.OA}'iE.NUEo CJty Clerk Orrice Fax (208) 888-42 I 8 . Human Resources , IDAHO 83642 0 (208) 888-4433 884-8723 . Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 '.i,', We ;;d;;~ \ IDAHO ~^ ~,y,.e" , ~""" "'"3 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211' Fax 887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 . Pax 888-6854 MAYOR Tommy de Weerd CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Shaun Wardle William L. M. Nary Charles M, Rountree Keith Bird LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 . FAX 466.4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579. Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208) 898-5500' Fax 887-1297 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: July 8, 2004 Transmittal Date: June 16, 2004 File No.: CUP 04-019 Request: Conditional Use Permit for a retail and professional office use in an existing building in the O-T zone for Larry Knopp By: Larry Knopp Location of Property or Project: Hearing Date: July 15, 2004 713 N. Meridian Road x David Zaremba, P/Z (NoFP) David Moe, P/Z (NoFP) Wendy Newton-Huckabay, P/Z (NoFP) Michael Rohm, P/Z (NoFP) Keith Borup, P/Z (NoFP) Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Bill Nary, CIC Charlie Rountree, CIC Keith Bird, CIC Shaun Wardle, CIC Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP) Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FPIPP only) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FPIPPonly) Qwest (FPIPP only) Intermountain Gas (FPIPP only) Bureau of Reclamation (FPIPPonly) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County Land Records Meridian Development Corporation Historical Preservation Commission Your Concise Remarks: .5:t-~ÆA .¡ r ÁY!A;, .h--.;o.:.- ,-') c;.- (I' RECJ.-iJ JUL 1 2 200~ r.., t) City Of MeridiaIl City Clerk Office 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE' MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 . (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 . Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 . Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 MAYOR Tammy de Weerd CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ke~h Bird William LM. Nary Shaun Wardle Charles M. Rountree e:M'e ~;dltrn LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 'Fax 466-44OS PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 898--S5OO . Fax 898-9551 tDAHO PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-SS33 . FAX 8a8-6854 MEMORANDUM: Transmittal Date: July 9, 2004 Hearing Date: July 15, 2004 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission RE CE IVli;I> SteveSiddoway,AssociateCityPlanner~ J'lt 1 '1 ~nO4 John Boyd, Engineering Technician n 946 U - L LlJ 713 N. Meridian Road From: Re: . Request for a Rezone of 0.23 acres ITom R-8 (Medium Density Residential) to D- T (Old Town), by Larry R. Knopp (File No. RZ~O4-008)- . Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a new DfficelRetail Building in a Proposed D-T Zone, by Larry R. Knopp (File No. CUP-O4-019). We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Cooncil: APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, Larry R. Knopp, has requested approval of a rezone of 0.23 acre ITom R-8 to D-T. The Comprehensive Plan depicts the subject property as Old Town, in harmony with the requested zoning designation. The applicant also requests a conditional use permit (CUP) for an office/retail building. Professional offices and retail are all conditional uses in the Old Town zone. The professional office/retail building is a remodel of an existing home and garage along Meridian Road, across ITom the Farmers & Merchants Bank project. The building is actually two separate existing structures (house and garage), which will be expanded and connected by a breezeway. The breezeway was added to connect the two structures and avoid requiring a planned development for two principal structures on a single lot. Parking will be accessed in the rear ITom the adjacent alley. The main issue affecting this project is the future right-of-way for Meridian Road. StatEs concerned that the City maintains an adequate corridor for the future Meridian Road widening project. The proposed addition to the ITont of the garage structure extends into area for potential future right-of- way, street buffer, and/or sidewalk. While staff does encourage buildings built up to the street/sidewalk in Old Town, the layout should be based on the ultimate configuration of the road. RZ-04-008, CUP.Q4.0I9 713 N Meridian RdRZ.CUP Plarming & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council July 15,2004 (Hearing Date) Page 2 ACHD's Five Year Work Program includes a Meridian Road project to widen it "to 3 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Right-of-way widths to be determined [70-80 feet], City of Meridian to decide on possible couplet with Main Street." The current right-of-way width adjacent to the project is 30 feet fj-om centerline. ACHD's report requests an additional 5 feet ofright-of-way, which would make 35 feet fj-om centerline, half ofthe 70-foot minimum needed for the 3 lane road improvements. However, it is also fair to say that the ultimate configuration of Meridian Road is in flux, and could be wider. The City and ACHD recently entered contract negotiations with a firm to conduct a Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan (DMTMP). The DMTMP will investigate in detail many possible scenarios, including a couplet, a 5-lane Meridian Road, and many other options. The final design should be established by the end of the year. With the design of Meridian Road undetermined, the main question becomes: How close should the new addition be built to Meridian Road? Staff explores this question and makes a recommendation later in this report. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) has reviewed the proposal and has determined that the existing home has been modified enough over the years that it is no longer eligible for historic register status. The proposed remodel would be an upgrade for the property, without destroying significant historic features. The HPC therefore recommends approval of the project. This report contains several special considerations for the Commission and Council. Upon resolution ofthose items, staffrecommends approval of the project with the conditions noted in this report. LOCATION & SURROUNDING USES The subject property is located on the west side of N. Meridian Road, north of Broadway Ave. in downtown Meridian. The following uses surround the subject property: North - Existing Residence, zoned R-8. South - American Legion Hall, zoned R-8. East- Farmers & Merchants Bank project, zoned a-To West - Existing Residences, zoned R-8. OWNER OF RECORD The owner of record is Idaho Trust Services, who has given consent for the applicant to submit the requested applications. RZ<J4<J08. CUP-04<J 19 713 N Meridian Rd.RZ.CUP D. E. Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council July 15, 2004 (Hearing Date) Page 3 STANDARDS FOR ZONING AMENDMENT The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances 01 each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering thelollowing questions about the proposed zoning amendment (11-15-11): A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive plan amendment; Staff finds that the requested Old Town (O-T) zoning designation is in accord with the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map, which delineates the subject property as "Old- Town". The text ofthe Comprehensive Plan (page 99) supports a variety of uses in the O-T zone, including offices and retail. In addition, it states, "In order to provide and accommodate preservation of the historical character, specific design requirements may be imposed. Pedestrian amenities would be emphasized." B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be re-zoned in the future; Staff finds that the proposed re-zone and accompanying development plans comply with the requested zone and staff does not anticipate that the property will be rezoned in the future. C. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning; Staff finds that the applicant has submitted detailed development plans for a Conditional Use Pennit for the property. Staff further finds that the proposed office/retail use will only be allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit in the proposed 0- T zone. Intended setbacks will be deEmed by the Downtown Transportation Management Plan; until the plan is complete and adopted, setbacks should be in alignment other structures on the block. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned; Staff finds that the City's Comprehensive Plan has provided the applicant with the abilityto request the O-T zone for the subject property. Much of Meridian Road has already redeveloped from residential to office or commercial uses. Will the proposed nses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds that the proposed development is designed in a manner that will be hannonious RZ-O4-O08, CUP-O4-O19 713 N Meridian Rd.RZ.CUP H. I. J. Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council July 15, 2004 (Hearing Date) Page 4 with and appropriate in appearance with the existing neighborhood, especially if setbacks are modified in alignment with other existing structures along the block. The proposed office/commercial use in hannonywith the intended uses in Old Town. Staff is pleased that the applicant has placed the parking in the rear of the building. F. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; Staff finds that the requested rezone should not be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. Through the comp plan process, the City detennined that compact, infill development is appropriate for the area. Any future change of use on the property that may have a significant impact on the surrounding properties will require conditional use approval under current ordinances, and adjoining property owners will have an opportunity to comment. Staff anticipates that the proposed office/retail building use will not be hazardous or disturbing to the neighboring uses. The Commission and Council should consider all public testimony, oral and written, before making this finding. G. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such service; Staff finds that the proposed uses can be adequately served by all essential public services and facilities. Drainage will need to be retained on site. Please show the proposed drainage facilities on the plans to be revised and resubmitted. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; Stafffmds that the requested uses will not create excessive additional requirements at public costs for public facilities and services. Additionally, staff finds that the proposed rezone would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production oftraffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; Staff finds that the proposed 0- T zoning designation of the property does not inherently allow uses that will generate activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions that are detrimental to the general welfare of the community. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to RZ-D4-D08, CUP-D4-D 19 713 N Mfridian Rd.RZ.CUP L. Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council July 15, 2004 (Hearing Date) Page 5 create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Staff finds that the proposed 0- T zoning will not interfere with general traffic patterns on any public streets. Please refer to the revised ACHD staff report for a full report on traffic issues. K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. Staff finds that the existing trees on the site are considered dead or dying and may be removed without mitigation No other natural or scenic features will be lost or damaged by the project. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City; Staff finds that the proposed rezone would be in the best interest of the City by allowing a property owner to make improvements to the property for re-development that would otherwise not be allowed without the rezone. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS (Rezone) 2. 3. 1. The legal description submitted with the application is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. The subject property is within the Urban Services Planning Area. A Development Agreement will not be necessary with this rezone. All conditions of approval will be made as part of the conditional use pennit. STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed conditional use in terms of the following, and may approve a conditional use permit ifthey shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-17-3): A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open spaces, parking, landscaping and other features as may be required by this ordinance; The proposed building is 2,674 s.f, total. Ordinance requires 1 per 400 s.f. for professional office and 1 off-street parking space per 200 s.f for retail uses. Thus, for an office use, the project would require 7 spaces. 7 spaces are provided per the site plan. For a retail use, however, the project would require 13 spaces. Staff finds that the subject property, as depicted, is large enough to accommodate the required parking, open spaces and landscaping RZ-04-ûO8, CUP-û4-û19 713 N Meridian Rd.RZ.CUP F. G. H. Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council July 15, 2004 (Hearing Date) Page 6 required by the ordinance for an office use, as long the buffers between land uses are approved under alternative compliance. The site does not have enough space to accommodate parking for a retail use. Therefore staff recommends approval ofthe project for office or other commercial use provided that parking requirements are met. See condition #2 below. C. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance; The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the property as Old Town. Staff finds that if the modifications required in this report are done, the application will meet the requirements of the Planned Development and other Zoning Ordinances. See items A and C under the Zoning Amendment Analysis. D. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood aud with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds the design concept to be compatible with the intended character of the area. See item E under the Zoning Amendment Analysis. E. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity; Staff does not anticipate that the proposed development will have an adverse impact on the surrounding property. However, the Commission and Council should consider any testimony given at the public hearings before making this finding. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; See comments under the Zoning Amendment Analysis item G. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; See comments under the Zoning Amendment Analysis item H. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment, RZ-O4-Q08, CUP-Q4-Q19 713 N Meridian Rd.RZ.CUP 2. Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council July 15, 2004 (Hearing Date) Page 7 and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; See comments under the Zoning Amendment Analysis item 1. I. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; See comments under the Zoning Amendment Analysis item J. J. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. See comments under the Zoning Amendment Analysis item K. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS 1. Setbacks: Predetennined setbacks are not specified in the zoning ordinance for the O-T zoning district. Therefore, setbacks have always been made a discussion point during the hearings and detennined as part of the CUP process. The main question is, "how close to Meridian Road should the new addition be constructed?" Issues dealing with the uncertain nature of the future right-of-way for Meridian Road are detailed in the Application Summary at the beginning of this report. Existing structures along the block have already established a typical setback line of approximately 28 feet measured from back of sidewalk, which is also approximately 23 feet from existing right-of-way, or 18 feet from the right-of-way as requested by ACHD. Staff recommends that the new addition be built in alignment with the existing structures along Meridian Road, per the setbacks described above. This will keep the structure in hannony with the character of other existing residences along the street. It will also provide maximum flexibility for the future road widening efforts. As an alternative, if the applicant waits until the Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan is adopted before pulling building pennits, the structure could be set back 10 feet from the established future right-of-way line. A ten foot setback would allow for a ten-foot wide parkwayllandscape buffer similar to the requirement placed on the Strickland Subdivision project further north. See Condition #3 below. Revised Plan: The site plan incorrectly shows the property line at the back of sidewalk along Meridian Road. The actual location is approximately 5 feet behind the sidewalk. Other dimensions also appear to be incorrect, for example, the distance from the rear property line RZ-O4-Q08, CUP-O4-Q 19 713 N Meridian Rd.RZ.CUP 4. Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council July 15,2004 (Hearing Date) Page 8 to the back of the existing residence scales at about 64 feet in ArcView, but scales at about 54 feet on the site plan; the distance from the rear property line to the existing carport scales at about 35 feet in ArcView, but scales at about 23.5 feet on the site plan. Staffrecommends that the applicant verify the dimensions and layout of the site plan and submit a revised site plan prior to the next hearing on this application. The revised plan should also show the drainage facilities, as requested by Public Works above. See Condition #4 below. 3. SÜroage: No freestanding signs are proposed for this project and none are approved. Since Old Town does not have specific signage regulations, any wall signs should be regulated by the L-O standards in the zoning ordinance. See Condition #5 below. 4. Alternative Compliance: The use to the north ofthe proposed project is cUITentiyresidential. A strict interpretation of the landscape ordinance would require a 20- foot buffer between land uses. However staff supports alternative compliance for this small infill site with landscaping per the proposed plan. The Commission should consider any testimony from the adjacent property owner when making this allowance. The same alternative compliance per 12-13-18-2.G was granted to the Strickland Subdivision project earlier this year. The only change requested by staff is that given the limited space, the proposed pine trees should be changed to an approved deciduous species. See Condition #6 below. 5. Trash Enclosure: No trash enclosure is depicted on the site plan. Please include a trash enclosure on the revised plans. Coordinate with Bill Gregory and SSC regarding enclosure size and location. See SSC's condition below. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The building and site improvements shall be constructed per the approved plans with all modifications required by this report. 2. The project is approved for office or other commercial use, provided parking requirements can be met. 3. The minimum setback for the proposed structures shall be 28 feet, measured from the back of existing sidewalk along Meridian Road. If the applicant chooses to wait until after adoption of the Downtown Meridian Transportation Management Plan to submit for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Building Permits for the project, the building may be constructed ten feet from the future right-of-way line established by the plan. The applicant shall revise the plan to correct the right-of-way/property line location and project layout, show the stonnwater facilities, show the trash enclosure, correct the tree species, and make any other changes required by the Commission, Submit 10 copies of the revised plan to the City Clerk's office at least 10 days prior to the next hearing on this application, RZ.Q4'()08, CUP'()4.()19 71 J N Meridian Rd.RZ.CUP 12. 13. 14. Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council July 15, 2004 (Hearing Date) Page 9 5. No freestanding signs approved for this project. Any wall signs shall be regulated bytheL-O standards for signage in the zoning ordinance. 6. The buffers between land uses, street buffers are approved per the dimensions shown on the approved sitellandscape plan (with the modified building setback). Pine trees shall be changed to an approved deciduous species. 7. This conditional use permit shall be subject to the expiration provisions set forthinMCC 11- 17-4.8. 8. All 90-degree parking stalls shall be at least 9 feet wide and 19 feet deep per Ordinance 11- 13-4.F. All drive aisles adjacent to parking shall be at least 25 feet wide. 9. The existing trees proposed for removal may be removed without mitigation. 10. All parking and drive aisles shall be paved for all uses, in compliance with the submitted plans. Handicap parking spaces shall be signed and striped in compliance with Federal accessibility guidelines. 11. All exterior lighting, whether attached to the building or located within the parking lot, shall be down-shielded or otherwise altered so that the light does not spill over onto adjacent properties or right-of-way. All parking lot lighting shall be in accordance with Ordinance 11- 13-4C. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in this report and Section 11- 14 of the City Zoning and Development Ordinance. All signage shall require separate sign permit(s). All construction and site improvements shall conform to the requirements ofthe Americans with Disabilities Act and the adopted building and fire codes. A drainage plan designed by a State ofIdaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. Storm water treatment and disposal must be designed in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off-site disposal into surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to development plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources regarding Shallow Injection Wells. RZ-D4-D08. CUP-04-D19 713 N Meridian Rd.RZ.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council July 15, 2004 (Hearing Date) Page 10 15. Certificate of Occupancy: All required improvements must be complete prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed development. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be obtained by providing surety to the City in the fonn of a letter of credit or cash in the amount of 110% of the cost of the required improvements (including paving, striping, landscaping, and irrigation). A bid must accompany any request for temporary occupancy. Fire Department Conditions 1. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water Department. 2. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 Y:," outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle. b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works spec. d. Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted red 10' to each side of the hydrant location. e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on comers. f. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'. 3. Building setbacks shall be per the Building Code for one and two story construction. 4. Commercial and office occupancies will require a fire-flow consistent with the International Fire Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 300' apart. 5. Maintain a separation of5' ftom the building to the dumpster enclosure. 6. Provide a Knoxbox entry system for the complex. 7. The first digit of the Apartment/Office Suite shall coITespond to the floor level. 8. Please contact the Fire Marshal at 888-1234 to work specific issues associated with this project. Sanitary Services Comment: 1. Please contact Bill Gregory at SSC (888-3999) for detailed review of your proposal prior to the public hearing. There is a concern that the required modifications may significantly impact your site design and may require a revised site plan. Ifthe site plan is revised, contact the planner assigned to the project immediately to discuss the changes and how to proceed with the revised site plan. RZ-O4-O08. CUP-O4-O 19 713 N Meridian Rd.RZ.CUP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council July 15,2004 (Hearing Date) Page 11 Police Department Comment: 1. The Police Department has no concerns related to the site design submitted with the application. Parks Department Comment: 1. The Parks Department has no concerns with the site design as submitted with the application. RECOMMENDATION Upon resolution ofthe remaining issues raised in this report, staff recommends approval ofthis application with the aforementioned conditions of approval. RZ-04'{)08. CUP-04'{) 19 7t3 N Meridian Rd.RZ.CUP D P P CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET July 15, 2004 ITEM # 8 ATE ROJECT NUMBER CUP 04-019 Larry Knopp ROJECT NAME &nclo" FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL (1(;8 ~~~T~~~ CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT R _HEALTH Environmental Health Division CO eturon tBO:. DEPARTMENT C\'V I:. olse RECI:. 0 Eagle iUL - 1 1\)Ql\ 0 Garden City . 01 ~eridi:"'e ÆóLMeridian c,tvC\¡\<.nihc 0 clW ~ Kuna OACZ 0 Star Rezone # Conditional Use # Preliminary / Final/Short Plat (' uP () L/ -01 '7 ~/L7 U-'IP 01. 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 09. We have No Objections to this Proposal. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: 0 high seasonal ground water 0 waste flow characteristics 0 or bedrock from original grade 0 other This office wili require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters andlor surlace waters. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Departm~nt of Water Resources concerning weli construction and water avaiiability. Aiter written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: 0 central sewage 0 community sewage system 0 community water well 0 interim sewage 0 central water 0 individual sewage 0 individual water The following pian(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmentai Quality: 0 centrai sewage 0 community sewage system 0 community water 0 sewage dry lines 0 centrai water 010. Run-off is- not to create a mosquito breeding probiem. 0 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. 012. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed 10 meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ~ We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ~d establishment 0 swimming pools or spas ~ge establishment ~ store 0 child care center 014. Please see attached stormwater management recommendatations 015. Dale: ..6:../2ãJ~ Reviewed By: ~~£- Rta#' COHO "OI~ Review Sheet RECEIVED JUN 2 ~ 200~ City of Meridian City Clerk Office ~ & ~ '7~ 'Di4Þûd 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 21 June. 2004 Phones: Areo Code 208 OFFICE: Nompo 466-786' SHOP: Nompo 466-0663 William G. Berg Jr. .~-~!IIl- 33 East Idaho Ave. Meridian, ill 83642 RE: CUP 04-019/713 N. Meridian Rd. Dear Will: If all stonn drainage is retained on-site there will be no impact on N amp a & Meridian Irrigation District and no further review will be required. However, if any surface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires a Land Use Change Application be filed for review prior to final platting. Please contact Donna Moore at 466- 7861 for further infonnation. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. Thank you, Ø41 pl--- Bill Henson Asst. Water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District BH/dbg c: Water Superintendent File - Office/Shop APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23.000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40.000