Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC - Public Testimony by Ben Innocent - 6/71 Machelle Hill From:Peggy Gardner Sent:Tuesday, June 07, 2016 3:29 PM To:mrbinnocent@gmail.com; Jacy Jones; Machelle Hill; Joshua Beach Cc:Anne Little Roberts; Danyele Jansen Van Beek; Genesis Milam; Joe Borton; Keith Bird; Luke Cavener; Peggy Gardner; Robert Simison; Tammy de Weerd; Ty Palmer Subject:RE: Opposition/complaint Ref: Verado Subdivision Proposal H-2016-0047 Dear Mr. Innocent: Your request has been received by the Mayor’s Office. We appreciate you contacting us to let us know of your concerns for the proposed Verado Subdivision . I will forward your comments to our City Clerk for the record and to be included in the packet the Mayor and Council members receive for the public hearing. Once an application is made, Mayor and Council are only able to make comments during the public hearing. It is scheduled to be heard by City Council on June 21, 2016. I have copied Josh Beach, the staff member assigned to this project. He will be able to answer any questions you may have regarding the process. Thank you for your comments and being part of the public process. Peggy Gardner Administrative Assistant to Mayor Tammy de Weerd City of Meridian 33 E Broadway Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208 489-0529 Follow City of Meridian updates on Facebook , Twitter , YouTube , LinkedIN and at www.meridiancity.org . From: meridian_apps@meridiancity.org [mailto:meridian_apps@meridiancity.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 2:05 PM To: CityCouncilContactForm Subject: Opposition/complaint Ref: Verado Subdivision Propsal H-2016-0047 Request for Mayor and Council Name Ben Innocent Last Name Innocent Email Address mrbinnocent@gmail.com Street Address 2000 E kamay Drive 2 City Meridian State ID Zip Code 83646 Subject Opposition/complaint Ref: Verado Subdivision Propsal H-2016-0047 Message Dear Members of the council, I am writing to make you aware of my opposition to this case number. My wife and I bought our first home here together in Chamberlain Estates recently. We both work and have part custody of her 11 year old daughter. When looking to buy a home we chose carefully. Like all parents we wanted a safe and quiet sub division that she could play in. We wanted a close knit neighborhood and we wanted to be part of a community. We chose Meridian over Boise as we felt that it held virtues close to our own. It has the heart in its community and whilst change and development should always be embraced it seemed a city that honored its heritage. Boise is growing at an alarming rate so Meridian seemed the perfect PNW setting for us. Upon buying the house we were aware development would happen and this is not a statement against change. It is a request for something compatible with the area. when looking at the Zoning of R15 for the majority of the Sub Division plat that is planned. It is apparent that this is NOT compatible with the surrounding homes. That is a high density zoning and would massively impact the surrounding houses and families in a negative manner. Our house is single level. The planned 2 level homes in the R8 lower section means that all of the current housing in Chamberlain Estates would be over looked. Thus having an effect on resale and value. It also is greatly going to impact our privacy. This again is not a compatible plan for the existing neighborhoods. I suggest that all surrounding housing is single level to afford a smooth transition between properties/neighborhoods. During the Public hearing a comment was made by the applicant suggesting they would hide the remaining occupants land as it was unsightly with tractors/vehicles ETC in the yard. This directly contradicts and denies Meridians heritage of farming and hard working families that founded the the city. Where is the respect for the people of meridian? the new developments should compliment and add to Meridians character and allure not make it a profit turning metropolis. I respectfully ask that you do right by the people of the City of Meridian that chose to be part of the community because of its values and density and restrict future development to be compatible with surround housing setting the precedent for Meridians future. Rather than allow a company to make as much money as possible at the cost to the quality of life to those that have already invested and are living here. Kind Regards, Ben Innocent