HomeMy WebLinkAboutTask Order 10022.C to Brown and Caldwell for WRRF Facility Plan Update FY2017TASK ORDER NO. 1OO22.C
Pursuant to the
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
crry oF MERtDtAN (OWNER) AND BROWN AND CALDWELL (ENGTNEER)
This Task order is made this 22"d day of November, 2016 and entered into by and
between the city of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the
State of ldaho, hereinafter referred to as "City", and accepted by BROWN AND
CALDWELL hereinafter referred to
covenant and conditions contained in
above mentioned parties dated Octob
is as follows:
as "Engineer'' pursuant to the mutual promises,
the Master Agreement (Category 24) between the
er 1,2014. The Project Name for this Task Order
The City of Meridian (City) is upgrading the Meridian Wastewater Resource Recovery
Facility (wRRF) to increase the level of treatment to meet expected lower National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination system (NPDES) permit limits for total phosphorus (Tp)
and ammonia. ln order to properly plan for both short- and long-term improvements
necessary to meet these NPDES permit requirements, the City is completing a Facility
Plan Update to supplement their previous facility plan completed in 2012. This Facility
Plan Update will also serve to prepare the necessary planning and alternative
evaluation documentation needed for regulatory approval and will incorporate all
portions required by ldaho Department of Environmental Quality.
The Facility Plan Update will include the following tasks:
Task 1 - Project Management
Task2-FacilityPlan
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1 Project Management
Objective. To manage, administer, and provide ongoing coordination for utilization of
resources for the project. This task includes technical and financial management of the
contract and acting as liaison with the City, operational staff, and project team.
Task Order 10022.C WRRF Facility Plan Update FY 2017
Brown and Caldwell
WRRF Facility Plan Update FY 2017
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Page '1 of 10
Approach. lvlajor activities include the following:
All communication from the consultant regarding the project will include the city project
manager (PM) or designee. The city pM will be responsible for coordinaiing andproviding all review comments and the resolution of all issues to the Enginee; in a
timely manner (typically 14 calendar days for design review); all other deiisions will
be provided to the Engineer within 7 calendar days or less. ihe Engineer pM will be
responsible for drafting meeting minules.
The Engineer will document any and all requested changes to the scope of work using a
Project change Request form. The Engineer pM wili collaborate with the city pN/L to
develop an approach for addressing the change(s). The city pM will review all
changes for approval and provide the Engineer with written approval prior to
modifying the existing scope, schedule, or budget and prior to proceeding with any
new or unscoped work activities.
Attend project kickoff meeting with City staff via conference call.
Attend up to four coordination meetings with City staff via conference call.
City Responsibilities. Provide the following:
1. ldentif ication of a PM with final authority for City decisions.
Timely review of products and decisions on issues critical to scheduled progress.
ldentif ication and involvement of appropriate City staff .
coordination of collected comments and resolution of any conflicting comments from all
City reviewers prior to returning to the Engineer.
Deliverables. Deliverables for the tasks listed above include the following items:
1. Monthly progress reports and invoices
2. Meeting minutes, as required
Task 2
Subtask 2.1
Facility Plan
Ci'tv Workshops
obiective. Present the progress made on the Facility Plan and review key decisions
and recommendations with City staff.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
1. Conduct up to eight workshops with City staff through the life of the proiect to
communicate progress made on the Facility Plan Update, review pertinent key topics,
and plan next steps. Each workshop is assumed to be 3 hours in duration. lt is
assumed that all workshops will require the attendance at least one out-of-town BC
team member. All workshops will have three BC team members in attendance.
Document the workshops and provide a summary of action items to team members at
the conclusion of each workshop.
Task Order 10022.C WRRF Facility Plan Updale FY 2017
Bro$m and Caldwell
Page 2 of 10
Deliverables.
Workshop agendas, materials, minutes, and summary of action items.
Subtask 2.2 lnvestioate Existino Wastewater Svstem Conditions
objective. To present the current and currently planned (in design or construction)
syslems for the Meridian WRRF, including capacity of each major unit process.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
1. ldentify the existing City planning area.
2. Conduct a survey with Meridian staff of the existing facilities. lnclude in this:
a. lncorporale results of the 2015 Process lnvestigations report on unit
process capacities.
b. lncorporate results of the 20 16 DAFT Stress Testing lnvestigation report
on DAFT capacities.
c. lncorporate current upgrades for headworks and liquid stream that are in
design or construction for updating existing system capacity.
d. lncorporale existing water reuse praclices
e. Discuss existing environmental conditions in the planning areaf. lncorporate a discussion on the limitations of the existing outfall system to
the Boise River.
g. Description of current NPDES permit
Review the last 5 years of historical influent flows, loads, and population in the City
Review any planned flow reduction measures for the City, including:
h. l&l reductions in the collection system
i. Water conservation around the Cityj. Water conservation requirements for new and existing housing
developments, commercial developments, and induslries within the City
Related waler quality planning documentation, including:
k. State water quality requirements for receiving waters in the service area
l. Designated uses for receiving waters
m. Water quality and technology based effluent limitations
n. Current TMDL issues for the receiving waters as they relate to future
NPDES permit limitations
Related City water resources planning (if different trom ZO12 facility plan)
Related air quality permits
Deliverables.
Chapter in the Facility Plan summarizing findings of this subtask.
Page 3 of 10Task Order 10022.C WRRF Facility Plan Update FY 2017
Brown and Caldwell
ask 2.3 Pl,nnt Crit
Objective. ldentify the planning criterla for use in allernatives evaluation and capital
improvements planning for the Facility plan.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
1. use the population and ind_rrstry growth flow and loading projeclions developed as
part of the current General Sewer plan project.
2. Develop projections for primary and secondary solids production based on flow and
load projections from the General Sewer plan.
3. Develop projections for biogas production based on digestion technology and solids
production projections.
4. Establish future discharge location to set planning for options analysis (Five Mile
Creek, Boise River, Water Reuse, or some combination).
'
Establish discharge criteria for NPDES discharge or reclaimed water permits for
anticipated flows and loads, depending on point of final discharge. This work will
incorporate the findings of the city's Reclaimed water Evaluation, 5ut it is anticipated
that some component of the effluent will be discharged to one of the wRRF's cunent
outfalls at all times (i.e. reclaimed water use will not account for 100 percent of theplant f low).
Establish luture temperature permit limits
Discuss potential future discharge criteria.
a. Microconstiutents/Compounds of Emerging Concern
b. Temperature TMDL
Deliverables.
Chapter on f uture conditions tor the Facility Plan.
Subtask 2.4 Liquid and olids Treatment Analvsis
objective. Evaluate alternalives for upgrading the Meridian WBRF to meet planning
criteria requirements for both liquids and solids streams.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
1. lncorporale findings of the 20 15 Alternatives Analysis project evaluating expansion
alternatives for the liquid stream processes to meet future growth -and permit
conditions. update as needed based on permit changes that have been made since
the project was completed.
2. lncorporate findings of the 2016 sidestream p Removal Evaluation analysis and the
2016 AirPrex Pilot Study.
3. lncorporate findings of the 2015 Sidestream Nitrogen Removal Evaluation.
4. Provide a discussion and cost analysis (AACE class 5) Ior a secondary road access
to the trealment facility from the North or West side of the facility.
Evaluate solids-stream discharge alternatives for the Meridian wRRF. Three potential
discharge locations and material qualities will be evaluated as part of this work:
landfill disposal, land application of Class B biosolids, and Class A biosolids.
Task Order
-1
0022 C WRRF Facilily Plan Updale FY 2017 page 4 of 10
Brown and Caldwell
ldentify and evaluate required WRRF solids system improvements related to growth
(i.e., capacity expansion) and repair and replacement projects. Evaluated options will
relate to the final selected/recommended disposal option selected
Do not provide an evaluation of standby power options for the facility, as this will be
completed under a separate project.
Provide planning level (AACE Class 5) cost estimate for alternatives idenlified for the
solids system expansions. These costs will consider regulatory and growth related
projects, which will have been identified lhrough the tasks noted above.
Provide costs for liquid process expansion based on the cunent Headworks and Liquid
Process Expansion design projects.
Provide rough site plan showing plant layout for recommended alternatives. site plans
will not be done in CAD.
Recommend an alternative based on cost evaluation and input from the City. For the
final selected expansion alternative for the facility (both solids and liquids):
a. ldentify any site security limitations/requirements.
b. ldentify f uture aesthetic needs for the facility (odor control, noise control,
traffic control on and off site).
c. Provide a staffing and organization evaluation, including future needs for
staffing, organization of the utility, and projected costs of O&M for the
expansion option-
d. Provide an evalualion of non-treatment process needs, including
administrative office space, lab space, maintenance space, and
equipment storage space.
e. lncorporating findings of other City studies inlo utility systems. These
would include non-potable water, gas, communications and electrical
systems within the site.
Deliverables.
Report chapters for discussion of alternatives and recommendation for expansion to be
incorporated into the Facility Plan report.
Subtask 2.5 Other Related Evaluations
Objective. Provide an evaluation for resource recovery options and options for
potential future permit limits not in the current permit.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
1. Resource Recovery Study - this study will provide a discussion on various options
for resource recovery, including phosphorus recovery, nitrogen recovery, reclaimed
water uses, biosolids recovery for beneficial reuse and biogas recovery and reuse.
These evaluations will not include any cost analysis and will be limited to potential
options discussion and reservation of plant footprint for future implementation as
desired by the City. The more detailed evaluations will include:
a. Phosphorus recovery: a summary of the Sidestream P removal report and
recommendations, as well as the findings of the AirPrex Pilot from 2016
and the previous Ostara pilot.
Task Order 10022.C WRRF Facility Plan Updale FY 2017
Brown and Caldwell
Page 5 of 10
b. Nitrogen recovery: a summary of recovery options for nitrogen/ammonia
from sidestream treatment.
c. Reclaimed water uses: a summary of the findings of the City's Future of
Reclaimed Water study
d. Biosoids Recovery for Beneficial Use: provide a discussion of options and
rough sizing of established and innovative technologies that produce
Class A solids or convert sludge to energy sources other than biogas.
e. Biogas Beneficial Use: Provide discussion of options and rough sizing of
established and innovative technologies for biogas use.
i. Contact ldaho Power to discuss options for funding
Provide a discussion of options and rough sizing of systems required to meet potential
future microconstituenls limits, but no costing associated with this. Provide sutficient
site space for future addition of these processes, as needed by the City.
Provide a discussion of options and rough sizing of syslems required to meet potential
fulure temperature TMDLs, but no costing associated with this. Provide sufficient site
space for future addition of these processes, as needed by the City.
Deliverables.
Report section for discussion of alternatives to be incorporated into the Facility plan
report.
Subtask 2.6 CIP
objective' Prepare a capital lmprovements plan (clp) for the Meridian WRRF thatprovides a clear outline of the regulatory-required projects between 201 9 and 2o3g
(including estimated cost and approximate year for initiation of each project. lt is
assumed the city will complete their own financial options evaluation for iunding of
projects.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
r. Based on lhe recommendations from subtask 4, assess the delivery methods for
project delivery for projects identified to support the selected alternatrve. The delivery
analysis will consider project grouping and potential delivery methods to meet
regulatory, financial, and organizational constraints.
Using updated flow and loading estimates, NpDES permit renewal conditions, capacily
assessment, and alternalives evaluation outcomes, prepare a clp for the Meridian
wRRF. This clP will include planning-level (AACE class 5) cost estimates for
projects and an estimated project initiation date.
Deliverables.
Report chapter lo be incorporated into the Facility plan Report.
Task Order 10022.C WRRF Facitity ptan Update Fy 2Ot 7
Brown and Caldwell Page 6 ol 10
objective. Prepare a comprehensive facilities plan document that summarizes lhe
findings from the above tasks and provides a clear framework for improvements to the
Meridian WRRF.
Approach. Major activities include the following:
1. summarize activities from subtask 2 through Subtask 6, including a comprehensive
clP that will include costs and schedule lor improvements, in a draft Facility plan. lt is
assumed that the draft Facility Plan will require the synthesis of information from the
previous tasks for presentation to the lDEe. The Facility plan will be reviewed by a
senior reviewer prior to being submitted to the City.
Prepare a final Facility Plan that provides a clear action plan for WRRF Upgrades.
Prepare lor and lead up to two meetings with the city and the lDEe to discuss the
findings of the Facility Plan and the city's intended action plan for expansion. lt is
assumed that two members of BC team will attend each of these two hour meetings.
At least one person from BC will be from out of town.
Deliverables.
1. Agenda and meeting materials for up to two meetings with the lDEe to discuss the
findings of the Facility Plan.
Draft Meridian Facilities Plan to be submitted electronically to the city for one round of
review and comment.
Final Draft Meridian Facilitles Plan to be submitted electronically to the lDEe for one
round of review and comment.
Final version of Meridian Facilities Plan to be submitted in electronic and hardcopy
format to the City and the IDEQ.
Subtask 2.7 Facilitv Plan Development
KEY P RSONNEL
David Bergdolt
dberodolt@b rwncald.com
(208) 389-7701
Rick Kelly
rkellv@brwn cald.com
(206) 749-2327
David Bergdolt will perform the administrative funclion including all program, policy, and
contractual issues. Rick Kelly will be responsible for coordrnation during the study phaie and
oversee all lechnical and project managemenl activities associated with the task order scope ol
work.
Task Order 10022.C WRRF Facility plan Update Fy 2017
Brown and Caldwell Page 7 of 10
MAJOR ASSUMPTI ONS
Note that work scope is conceptual in nature, based on limited information, and
should only be relied upon for general planning purposes.
Consultant will rely upon, without independent information, information from third
parties, including available information related to reports related to key plant
processes.
Recommendations and potential energy savings are based upon many data
points and assumptions. Many of these variables are affected by the influent
characteristics, costs of electricity and natural gas, planning level construction
estimates, and O&lVl costs. Final results will depend on the variables which
should be considered and reconfirmed as part of any preliminary design of
potential improvements.
The evaluation will rely on the accuracy of record drawings and historical records
provided by the City. lf drawings, data, or historical records are deemed to
inaccurate, additional field effort may be required. BC will alert the City if
expanded field effort is required over what was anticipated al the time the scope
was prepared.
Estimates of digester gas production, variability, and quality design criteria will be
based upon current digester gas production rates reported by the City relative to
volatile solids reduction (VSR), variability in gas production reported by the City
and any gas quality data provided by the City. Should information from the City
be unavailable, typical design values will be used. Final results will depend on
the quality and quantity of the data available from the City, and should be
reconfirmed as part of any preliminary design of potential improvements.
Any permits (including air) and associated support beyond those identified may
be considered as additional services.
The opinions of probable construction costs will be prepared to industry
standards but will be subject to many influences including, but not limited to,
price of labor and materials, schedule impacts, unknown or latent conditions of
existing equipment or structures, and time or quality of performance by others.
These types of issues are diflicult to forecast and are out of the control of BC and
that actual costs may vary substantially from the estimates prepared by BC. BC
is therefore unable to guarantee the accuracy of opinion of probable construclion
costs beyond that of industry standards.
The City will make available in a timely manner all drawings, records and site
information obtained relative to the project, including topographical survey, and
information related to any and all underground utilities, hazardous materials,
easements, permits, geotechnical investigations, lab data, environmental
surveys, etc. as necessary for completion of the work under the above detailed
scope.
The site does not have any environmental related concerns including
contaminated soil, endangered species, etc. that would impact alternatives
implementation or associated cost estimates. Environmental studies, including
Phase 1 surveys or any other type of study/survey are not included as part of this
2
J
b
7
4
5
8
I
Page 8 ol 10
ASSUMPTIONS
Task Order 10022.C WRRF Facility Plan Update FY 2017
Brown and Caldwell
pro.ject scope. lf any regulatory agencies require additional studies be performed,
they can be added as additional services, but may impact the overall project
schedule.
'I 0. The initial effort is limited to the cost identif ied in the attached fee estimate. lf the
effort to complete the identified tasks exceeds the estimate, the pM will
coordinate with the City to identify areas we can limit our effort to the available
budget.
'1 1. Recommendations for future improvements that relate to specific nutrient
reductions or other regulated requirements will be based upon our current
understanding of requirements for future permits as provided by the City of
Meridian.
TIME OF COMPLETION ANd COMPENS ATION SCHEDULE
The lollowing schedule is based on a Notice to Proceed (NTp) from the City by
November 2016 and resulting in Final Design being completed by August 2017. A NTp
issued on a different date will change the schedule accordingly.
The Not-To-Exceed amount to complete all services listed above for this Task Order
No. 10022.C is four hundred ninety seven thousand, seventy three dollars
($497,073.00).
Any travel expense will be reimbursed, only if pre-approved by the Project Manager,
and only per the City of Meridian Travel Policy.
COMPENSATION AND COMPLETION SCHEDULE
Task Descr!ption Compensation
1 Proiect Managemenl . 8t31t2017 $34,690.00
2 Facility Plan $462,383.00
2.1 Subtask 1 - Workshops (meeting
minutes)
.8131/2017
$41,449
Subtask 2 - Existing Conditions
draft chapter
. 3hO12017
$45,831
2.3 Subtask 3 - Planning Criteria
draft chapter
. 41712017
$58,018
2.4 Subtask 4 - Alternatives Analysis
draft chapter
. 6/30/2017
$209,354
2.5 Subtask 5 - Related Evaluations
draft chapter
. 712812017 45.934
Subtask 6 - CIP draft chapter .811'l/2017 $26,327
2.7 Subtask 7 - Facility Plan
Development dratt report
. A/1112017
$29,400
2.7.1 Subtask 7 - Facility Plan
Development final report
. 8/31/2017
$6,070
TASK ORDER TOTAL: $497,073.00
Task Order 10022.C WRRF Facilily Plan LJpdate FY 2017
Brown and Caldwell
Page I of 10
Due Date
. 8t31t2017
2.2
2.6
Reimbursable expenses will be paid at cost and only if pre -approved by the Project
Manager. Any travel and/or reimbursables paid will be paid as part of the Not -To -
Exceed Task Order Total per the Compensation and Completion Schedule above,
CITY OF MERIDIAN _. OW AND CALDWELL
BY: BY:
TAMMY de W , MAYOR
Dated:
Approved by Council:—
Attest:
CJ C I s, Cl CLERK
Purchasin Approv 1
BY:�
KEIT A S, urchasing Manager
City Project Manager
Clint Dolsby
Task Order 10022.0 WRRF Facility Plan Update FY 2017
Brown and Caldwell
7
DepartFiipfit App
BY
WAA�ENST�EAR�,Glty �Enginee�r�
Dated:_ /I
Page 10 of 10
CONTRACI CHECKTIST
t.PROJECT INFORMATION
Pu
5497,o79
Chan8e Order No
tc Wo
ctor/Consultant/DesiSn Engineer
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Brown & Caldwell
Contract Amount:
Project Name:
Date
Project Manager: Clint Dolsby
.BUDGET INFORMATION (Proiect Manager to Completel t.Contract Type
Fund:
Depa.tment
GLAccount
Project Number:
Wllthe project cross fiscalyears?
60
vesE ruo El
Construction D
Task Order El
Professional Service E
Equipment E
Grant D
tv.GRANT INFORMATION - to be completed only on Grant funded proiects
waSe veriffcation 10 Days prior to bid due date
N/A
Grant fl
Print, anach and amend bid by addendum (ifchanged)www.5arn.gov Print and attach
oebarment Status (Federal Funded)
N/A
wage Determination Received
N/A
RFP / RFQ TASX ORDER
Award based on Low Bid Hithest Ranked Vendor Selected
(Bid Results Attached )ves E NoD (Ratings Atta€hed) Yes E No E
Master Agreement Category
Date MSA Roster Approved:
2a
tol ll2ot4
TypicalAward Yes E No E
lf no please state circumstances and conclusion:
7 day protest period ends:
VI COI{TRACTOR / CONSULTANT REqUIRED INFORMATION
Payment and Performance Bonds ReceilEd (Date)
Builders Risk lns. Req'd: Yes E
(onv .prlic.b.l. io. prcj.cte .bd. S10O),oO)
lfyes, has policy been purchased?
lnsurance Certificates Received (Date)
Goodstanding
Rating:
N/A Corporalion Status
sl3t/2ot7
v[.TASX ORDER SEIECTION (Project Manager to Complete]
Reason consultant selected
Check dll thot opply
gr
a2
E3
@4
Performaice on past projects
E Quality of work
E on time
Qualified Pe6onnel
Availability of personnel
Localof personnel
El on BudSet
D Accuracy of Construction Ert
Description of neSotiataon process and fee evaluation
E.ter sup€ruiror .mc
10/1112016
v .AWARD INFORMATION
Date Submitted to Clerk for ASenda November 17, 2016 ApprovalDate
W85 subrnitted
(ohry lor Pw co^stru.tion Poj.cte)
NTP Date
10/6/2016
WRRF FACILITY PLAN UPDATE FY 2017
ls this a change order? ves E no E
Budget Available (Pu rchasing attach report):
ves El No !
FY Br-'dget: tY17
Enhancementr Yes E No E
3210
5s080
LOO22.C
Print and anach the determrnation
BASIS OF AWARD
8tD
Expiration Date:
NoE
Rating: N/A
&firatbn Date:
slLll2016
8y:
Oate lssued:
t.PROJECT INFORMATION
5497,o7t
ChanSe Ord€r No.
c o
Fa.ll Plan U
nsultanVD€5i8n Englneer:Brown and caldwell
Project Name
Date:70l6/20L6
ls thls a chan8eorder? ves I ru E]
REqUESTING DEPARTMENT
Wastewater Resource
ProJect Manager: Clint Dolsby
BUDGET INFORMATION iI Man to Com t.Contract Type
Fund:
Department
GLAccount
Prorect Numben
Eudget Avallable (Purchaslng attach report):
v"' El No E
FY Budget: 17
Enhancementr Y6 El
no El
3270
LO022
Yet
60
Wllthe projed cross flscal yea rs?
NoE
Construction
Task order
Professlonal Servlce
Equipment
Grant
tr
E]
tr
trtr
IV GRANT INFORMATION - to be completed only on Grant funded prolects
Grant #WaEe oeteininatlon Recelved Wa& V€rlic.llon 10 Dayr prlor io bld due date oebarm.nt Statu3 (Fed.r.l runded)
Prht 6nd Attach the determlnatlon Prin!, attach.nd am€nd bld by.dd.ndum {it.hrnscd)www.sam.gov Prlnt and attach
BASIS OT AWARD
BID RFP / RFq TASI( ORDER
Award based on Low Bld Hlghert Ranked Vendor s.lected
(8ld Results Attached)NoD!ENo I I(Ratln8s Atta ched) Y.t
Master ASreement Category
Date N4SA Ro,ter Approved:
2a
TyplcalAwardY.'DoE
If no plcase state clacumJtances and concluCon:
7 day protest perlod ends:
VI CONINACTOR / CONSUI.TANT REQUIREO INFORMATION
Paynent and Pertormanc€ Eondi Ra<llvad (Data)r
Eullders Rhk lns. Req'd: Ycs D
lott .DplL.b.h d pD,..i, .hd. S,"morOO)
Explratlon Date:Corporatlon Status
Explratlon Date Ratlng
No!lf yes, has pollcy been purchated?
lnsuranc€ ce.tlflcates Rec€lved (oate):
CONTRACT CHECKLIST
vlll.AWARD INFORMATION
oate Submltted to Clerk for Agenda:
Purchase Otder No.l
Approvaloate 8yl
Date lssued:WH5 subrnlfted
{Oily tu. PW coinMtl@ tEj.dt)
NTP Oate:
Perform.nce on past projects
E Quallty ofwork
E on time
Quallffed Personnel
Avallablllty of personnel
E1
tocalof rsonnel4
Reason Consultant Seleded
Check o thdtopply El on Budget
E Accuracy of Constructlon Est
a2
trg
O€rcdptlon of neSotlatlon process and fee €valuadoni
Erown ard caldwell's scope of work for the faclllty plan update was reylewed lnt€rnally and compared to the lart fadllty plan comdeted for the Clty In 2012 by the team of
CH2M HlLLand HgrR EnSl.eerln& lnc.5560,000. The current scope covered the elements r€qul.ed by the ldaho Department of Environmental Quallty tor a faclllty pla. and
lncorporated requlrements from the recently adopted Publlc Works Tactlca I Plan. The fee of 5497,073 represents a savln
recent work on the capaclty assessment (972,183), alternatlves evaluatlon (5236,234), and thelr famllla rlty
from the lastfaclllty plan due to Erown and caldwell's
th the p
Contract Amount:
55080
RatlnSr _
IDSOS Viewing Business Entity Page I of3
IDAHO SECRETARY OF STATE
Viewing Business Entity
Lawerence Denney, Secretary of State
I New Search ] [ Back to Summary ]
I Get a certificate of existence for BROWN AND CALDWELL ]
Monitor BROWN AND CALDWELL business filinost
BROWN AND CALDWELL
201 NORTH CIVIC DRIVE
SUITE 115
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596
Type of Business:
Status:
State of Origin:
Date of
Origination/Authorization:
Current Registered Agent:
Organizational ID / Faling
N umber:
Number of Authorized Stock
Shares:
Date of Last Annual Report:
Annual Report Due:
Origina! Filing:
Filed 30 Jul 1975
Amendments:
Amendment Filed 30 Jul 1975
Amendment Filed 29 Oct
1975
Amendment Filed 23 Oct
1978
Amendment Filed 13 Nov
L97A
Amendment Filed 13 Nov
L97A
Amendment Filed 13 Nov
1978
Amendment Filed 13 Nov
t97A
Amendment Filed 13 Nov
t978
CORPORATION, GENERAL BUSINESS
GOODSTANDING 25 Oct 1988
CALIFORNIA
30 Jul 1975
C T CORPORATION SYSTEM
921 S ORCHARD ST STE G
BOISE, ID 83705
c51813
16 Jun 2016
Jul 2077
I Helo lYe Print/View TIFF ]
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY
I Help Me Print/View TIFF ]
OTHER - RA
OTHER - CHG RA
MERGED WITH J. B. GILBERT AND
ASSOCIATES
NAME CHANGED TO BROWN AND CALDWELL
STOCK CHANGE
MERGED WITH CAMANCHE LAKE PARK
MERGED WITH ].8. GILBERT AND
ASSOCIATES
STOCK CHANGE
https://www.accessidaho.org/public/sos/corp/C5 I 8 I 3.html | 1t17 t2016