Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 1, 2004 P&Z Minutes Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Juiy1,2004 Page 5 of35 its location and we have since moved the house and it's located on Lot 8 in the original plat in the northwest corner and it has been moved and we are agreeable to the conditions. I think there is a condition that speaks about the house moving and we have already moved it, so it's kind of a -- doesn't really apply, but other than that we are in agreement. Any questions? Borup: Questions from the Commission? Okay. Do we have any other testimony on this application? Seeing none, Commission? Zaremba: Mr. Chairman, I move the Public Hearing be closed. Moe: Second. Borup: Motion and second to close the Public Hearing. All in favor? Any opposed? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Zaremba: Is there some discussion? These two lots were one lot with a house right in the middle of it and that house now has been moved off the property and they are splitting the lot. Newton-Huckabay: Okay. Thank you. Zaremba: All right. Mr. Chairman, I move that we forward to the City Council recommending approval of PFP 04-006, request for preliminary/final -- if it's a final, do we need to forward it or do we actually do it? Borup: Yeah. It still goes to City Council. Zaremba: All right. I will start over again. Mr. Chairman, I move we forward to the City Council recommending approval of PFP 04-006, request for a preliminary/final plat approved for the re-subdivision of Lot 14, Block 1 of Woodside Creek Subdivision No.1 into two building lots, .32 acres, in an R-8 zone for proposed Woodside Creek Subdivision No.2 by Woodside Properties, LLC, 1115 North Ten Mile Road, to include all staff comments of their memo for the hearing date of June 3, 2004, received by the city clerk June 2, 2004. Moe: Second. Borup: Motion and second. All in favor? Any opposed? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 6: Public Hearing: AZ 04-011 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 9.8 acres to R-8 and L-O zones for proposed Alexandria Subdivision by Lonnie Johnson - 4205 North Locust Grove Road: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission July 1, 2004 Page 6 of35 Item 7: Public Hearing: PP 04-017 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 27 single-family residential and office building lots and two (2) common lots on 9.8 acres in R-8 and L-O zones for proposed Alexandria Subdivision by Lonnie Johnson - 4205 North Locust Grove Road: Item 8: Public Hearing: CUP 04-015 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development for reductions to the minimum requirements for lot area, rear building setbacks, street side setbacks and minimum street frontage for proposed Alexandria Subdivision by Lonnie Johnson - 4205 North Locust Grove Road: Borup: Okay. Our next items on our Agenda, six, seven, and eight, stated has been re- noticed, so I assume there is some problems with the application or-- Kirkpatrick: There was a noticing error. We had the incorrect number of lots given us by the applicant, so we have to re-notice, but tonight we will need to table and assign a new hearing date, so we can do the re-notice. Borup: Okay. All right. Kirkpatrick: So, you will have to look at your schedule and figure out when we reschedule it for. Zaremba: Mr. Chairman. Wendy, what is the time lag for a recnotice? Does it take two weeks? Ten days? Three weeks? Okay. So, it has to be at least -- Kirkpatrick: We should consult Jessica on that. I believe it's two weeks. Johnson: Ten days to post. Kirkpatrick: Oh, ten days to post. Johnson: And, then, 15 for the hearing notices in the mail before. the hearing date and, then, in the paper we publish it two weeks -- yeah. Two times -- it's confusing, The week before -- on a Monday before and, then, a Monday two weeks before that, so -- in the paper. Zaremba: Minimum of three weeks; right? Johnson: Oh, yeah. Kirkpatrick: And I assume the applicant wants to get on the agenda again as quickly as possible, so we will -- I think August 5th is fairly full at this point. Johnson: August 19th is very full, too. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Juiy 1, 2004 Page 7 of35 Zaremba: Uh-huh. Borup: What is July 29th? We don't have anything on the 19th? I mean the 29th? Don't we already have a meeting scheduled for the 29th? Was that just going to be a workshop or-- Zaremba: We were trying to avoid putting hearings on that. That was going to be a workshop and discussion. Moe: The 29th? Zaremba: The third Thursday of this month. The fifth Thursday. Moe: I thought that was a hearing? Kirkpatrick: I believe we decided a while ago to not do the hearing on the 29th, Johnson: Yeah. I don't have an agenda for it or anything, unless we want to do a special meeting and table some of these to that. Siddoway: Mr. Chairman. Borup: Steve, you had some additional information? Siddoway: I was just going to say at one of the last meetings the Commission did approve a special meeting on the 29th, because we had such a large number of applications. Those applications did not end up being complete in time to go on the 29th slot, so that's what happened. We didn't end up with the number of applications complete on that deadline date that we had originally anticipated, so while we did go ahead and get the pre-approval for that special date, we wound up not having as many -- any projects to put on it. Borup: That makes more sense, because I thought we had hearings scheduled for then originally. Rohm: And the agenda for the first Thursday in August is already full? Zaremba: The 5th is pretty full. Borup: Well, we have got ten - ten hearings. I haven't analyzed how many projects. Zaremba: Well, I could go either way, since we have no other items, put this on the 29th or-- Meridian Pianning & Zoning Commission July 1, 2004 Page 8 of35 Borup: We just need to -- we don't need to decide that right now, we just need to do it before the end of the meeting. Kirkpatrick: Yeah. That's -- I think the applicant is here, probably, to get that hearing date. Borup: How about our second one that has the deferral? Are we looking at establishing a date for that tonight? Also Item No.9? Hawkins-Clark: Chairman Borup, that's correct. However, the reason that that's being deferred is because we are waiting for a Conditional Use Permit to go with it. Borup: Oh, that's right. Hawkins-Clark: And we have not received that. So, it would be too early -- the 29th would be too early for that one. Borup: Okay. The reason for the re-notice on this was -- Wendy, the applicant put the wrong number of lots down? Kirkpatrick: Right. The number of lots on the application was one lot fewer than the actual number of subdivision lots on the plat. Borup: Residential lots. Kirkpatrick: Residential -- correct. Residential lots. Borup: So, it wasn't a -- Kirkpatrick: When we do a notice, we do it off of the application form. Borup: I mean it wasn't a common lot or utility lot or -- Kirkpatrick: No. If it was a common lot we would - we would have gone ahead with the hearing, but because it was a building lot we try to be consistent, make sure we re- noticed it. Borup: Right. Okay. Well, we have got -- Newton-Huckabay: We have one hearing on the -- Zaremba: No. Steve just said everything that was anticipated for the 29th went away or is -- doesn't go away. it's later. Meridian Pianning & Zoning Commission July 1, 2004 Page 9 of35 Borup: Six. We have six actual separate items. I mean, you know, ten numbered, but six -- six actual because of, you know, several on the same one. One of those is a text amendment and most of the others are small subdivisions. Some commercial. Rohm: Sometimes small, doesn't necessarily mean short. Zaremba: It doesn't make it easy. You're talking on the 29th; right? Borup: Yes. No. The 5th. August 5th. Zaremba: Oh, I'm not considering adding anything to the 5th. Borup: Okay. Rohm: Personally, I think that would give us good cause to go ahead and meet on the 29th and, then, we can -- Zaremba: We can do the workshop. Rohm: -- do our workshop and hearing this for this applicant and, then, we are kind of taking care of two things and moving forward in a positive direction. That seems appropriate to me, Borup: That's one way to force us to come to the workshop. Rohm: Bingo. That's what I was thinking. Borup: All right. Zaremba: All right. I can make a motion along those lines, then. Mr. Chairman, I move that we table AZ 04-011 and PP 04-017 and CUP 04-015 to our meeting of July 29th and that that meeting date requires all types of re-notice. Rohm: I'll second that. Borup: Motion and second. All in favor? Any opposed? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 9: Public Hearing: AZ 04-012 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 1.82 acres from RT to C-C zone for proposed Wrinkleneck Project by Wrinkle neck Partners, LLC - Northwest corner of East Overland Road and South Locust Grove Road: