Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 15, 2004 P&Z MinutesMeridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 15, 2004 Page 32 of 60 word parking -- agreement -- delete the word for shared parking -- between the subdivision lots and for the property to the north of the subject property must be submitted. And on page 17 we will add a paragraph 15 that says: Ten days prior to the next hearing the applicant will submit a revised plat showing that the north access to the north property -- that the access point to the north property is moved to the west. End of motion: Moe: That was on page seven; correct? Zaremba: That is on page seven, a new paragraph 15. Moe: I second. Borup: Motion and second. All in favor? Any opposed? -' MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Borup: Thank you. Okay. Zaremba: I did have one left-over question. How did McKinnon get the first two items on the agenda when last year he was always the last one? You have moved up in the world, sir. Item 9: Public Hearing: RZ 04-004 Request for a Rezone of 9.47 acres from R- 4 to L-O and R-8 zones for Southwoods Subdivision by Calderwood Community, LLC - 2090 South Meridian Road: Renoticed to April 29, 2004 Item 10: Public Hearing: PP 04-007 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 15 building lots (14 office and 1 residential) and 1 common lot on 9.47 acres in proposed R-8 and L-O zones for Southwoods Subdivision by Calderwood Community, LLC - 2090 South Meridian Road: Renoticed to April 29, 2004 Item 11: Public Hearing: CUP 04-008 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development for office and assisted living in proposed R-8 and L- Ozones for Southwoods Subdivision by Calderwood Community, LLC - 2090 South Meridian Road: Renoticed to April 29, 2004 Borup: Maybe. He got denied. As mentioned at the beginning of the meeting, the next project, Items 9, 10, and 11, there will not be a hearing tonight. It has been re-noticed for April 29th. And also as has been mentioned, Sutherland Farms -- are we okay on that? That's also continued to the 29th. I think maybe we will want to take a look at that at the end of the meeting and see if that works. Zaremba: We can choose adate - Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 15, 2004 Page 33 of 60 Item 12: Public Hearing: AZ 04-005 Request for annexation and zoning of 5.27 acres from RUT to R-4 zones for proposed Packard Acres Subdivision No. 3 by Packard Estates Development, LLC -south of East Ustick Road and east of North Locust Grove Road: Item 13: Public Hearing: PP 04-006 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 20 single-family residential building lots and 2 common lots on 5.273 acres in a proposed R-4 zone for proposed Packard Acres Subdivision No. 3 by Packard Estates Development, LLC -south of East Ustick Road and east of North Locust Grove Road: Borup: Okay. Our next item -- not only our next, but last is Items 12 and 13, Public Hearing AZ 04-005, a request for annexation and zoning of 5.27 acres from RUT to R-4 zones for the proposed Packard Acres Subdivision No. 3 and Public Hearing PP 04- 006, request for preliminary plat approval of 20 single-family lots on these 5.273 acres. At this time I'd like to open both public hearings and start with the staff report. Hawkins-Clark: Thank you, Chairman Borup, Members of the Commission. On the first Item, No. 12, the annexation and zoning request, the applicant has proposed a rezone to R-4. The property is here on the north, the bold actually outlines two five-acre parcels more or less. We are just -- the subject property tonight is just on the north here. There is two separate Ada County tax parcels, both owned by the applicant and both are the subject of the application. Ustick Road is here on the north part of the screen, on the top of the screen. Several Ada County undeveloped parcels on the south side of Ustick. Wingate Lane, private lane, does extend at the mid mile between Locust Grove and Eagle Road down to the property. Packard Acres 2 is to the north. Chateau Meadows East is to the west. The parcel on the south zoned RUT, separate ownership. Packard Acres No. 1 is located here. Carol Subdivision has also had about half of their properties annexed last year and, then, of course, you have an office park and River Valley Elementary School. So, that's generally the vicinity that we are talking about. Packard Acres -- existing Packard Acres Subdivision is also R-4 zoning, so they are proposing the same zone for this five-acre in-fill parcel. The Comprehensive Plan does designate the property as medium density residential, which is three to eight dwelling units per acre and they are proposing the R-4, which does conform with that. Our staff report lists several other Comprehensive Plan policies, as well as the applicant's cover letter, a couple of -- that they felt fit the policies, particularly in fill, is a goal and policy of the Comprehensive Plan to get these annexed and on city services. So, the findings that we listed for annexation and rezone did generally find that -- that the application meets the required findings for that and there is a recommendation for approval. On item number 13 -- I guess this aerial photo zooms in a little bit and shows you more or less existing conditions. I think this was taken about mid 2003, I believe. It does reflect the street construction that was part of Packard Acres that exists. The parcel is outlined here and it does have East Challis that is already constructed here on the north boundary of the parcel. As you can see, there are some existing houses and some out buildings on the site. This is just a photograph to give you a sense for the