HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 11-30 Regarding the Easy Jet Subdivision Joanne St. Charles DEC2015JoPDFNovember 26, 2015
City Clerk
Meridian City Hall, Suite 104
33 E Broadway
Meridian, ID 83642
Response to the Staff Report
RE: REVISED EASY JET SUBDIVISION APPLICATION (RZ 15‐012, PP 15‐016, CUP 15‐017)
To Members of the Meridian City Council,
After reviewing the Staff reports and doing some additional research, I am concerned that some things
may have been overlooked. When the land in question was annexed it was done so with R-4, L-O and C-
G zoning. As the report indicates, the planned unit development was conceptually approved to include
multi-family housing under Meridian City Code 12-6-3. What is not clear in the Staff report is that the
original plan indicated where that multi-family housing was to be. Here is that information:
Excerpt from PP 02-004:
(Map provided below)
Plat map from 2002 (PP02-004)
Such a plan made sense as it provided a nice buffer for all residences, transitioned well, and offered a
large area for a multi-family complex where there was also access to turn right onto either Easy Jet or
Eagle Rd. This was an intelligent and thoughtful design that would have fit well with the rest of
Sutherland Farms.
In 2004 the developer amended the plan seeking to achieve density goals by adding more R-8 density
with a special variance to reduce minimum land area frontage required by the R-8 Zone. The
developer’s (J.U.B) application also states, “No other variances or waivers are required or requested.”
Plat map from 2004 (PP04-009)
Reviewing “Sutherland Farm AZ 02-004” we find that the Easy Jet Drive, which prohibits street parking
west of South Nephrite Way, and also allowed no front-on housing, was constructed as a “collector” and
industrial road way, not as a simple local street.
Excert From Sutherland Farm AZ 02-004
Excerpt from ACHD Idaho
If Easy Jet Drive is a Collector, then based on the charts below, it would appear that the min landscape
buffer should be 20ft (not 10 ft. as indicated in the staff report). Meanwhile, the developer’s proposed
plan indicates a buffer of only 5-10 feet from the street.
Based on the chart below, it would appear that a minimum landscaping buffer of 25 feet should be
provided between the C-G multi-family development and the R-4 residential use area. The demeloper’s
proposed plan indicates a buffer of only 10-20 ft.
With regard to land uses, this area has already been developed with multiple residential uses. The
original Development plan (made for annexation) included substantial plans to develop places of work
and services for the community. We’ve seen those plans cut in the past. Now the developer is asking to
cut them further by adding an apartment building to the land that was part of the 2002 Sutherland
Farms Master Development Plan.
Developments of 20 units or more are required to provide a property management office, maintenance
and storage area, and central mailbox location. We do not see those things on the revised plan.
The character of the proposed structures does not comply with the CC&Rs of the Sutherland Farms
Development. With regard to one family, there are no assurances that renters would not be allowed to
sublet rooms to others or that other CC&Rs would be observed. Most obviously the fact that the
proposed building are to be hardiplank in three colors will do little to fit into a neighborhood that
requires substantial stone or masonry on all front facing elevations.
Excerpt from CC&Rs below:
The Staff report indicates that an arterial abuts this street and notes the signal light. They reach the
conclusion that the site is therefore easily accessible. They might not be taking into account that the
site has no direct access to Eagle rd. Also the site is south of Easy Jet Drive. So the only access to leave
the site toward Eagle Rd, is by making a left hand turn. The site is close enough to Eagle Rd that traffic
already backs up there during peak times. We are concerned that an R-15 development on this site will
result in traffic being forced to turn right and head east on Easy Jet Drive through other neighborhoods
to gain access to arterials, because Eagle Rd will be difficult to access.
In summary, it seems likely that this land is well suited for light office and services as was designated in
the original master plan for Sutherland Farms back in 2002. Given that the proposed plan does not fit
within the required set backs, or leave room to accommodate the required buffers, it does not seem to
be a good site for the development proposed.
Respectfully,
Joanne St Charles and Robert Nelson
3482 E Yesternight St Meridian ID 83642
November 24, 2015
City Clerk
Meridian City Hall, Suite 104
33 E Broadway
Meridian, ID 83642
RE: REVISED EASY JET SUBDIVISION APPLICATION (RZ 15‐012, PP 15‐016, CUP 15‐017)
To Members of the Meridian City Council,
When I attended the Public Hearing with the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 15th, I got the
impression that the committee was approving (with recommendations) the apartment complex because
they thought they were bound by some previous agreement with the developers of Sutherland
Farms/Sutherland Downs. I researched all of the previous Easy Jet/Sutherland Farms/Downs project
info in the City of Meridian Archives to try to understand.
It is true that the preliminary plat design of 2002 indicated the possibility of Multi Family Housing
specifically in the “Eastern end of the office area adjacent to the town homes.” The map below shows
the design at that time and the proposed location of the potential future multi-family homes. Such a
plan made sense as it provided a nice buffer for all residences, transitioned well, and offered a large
area for a multi-family complex where there was also access to turn right onto either Easy Jet or Eagle
Rd. This was an intelligent and thoughtful design that would have fit well with the rest of Sutherland
Farms.
Plat map from 2002 (PP02-004)
In 2004 (PP04-009) the developer opted instead to redesign and expand the planned R-8 section of the
development, using a portion of the planned office pads as well as a portion of the land proposed for a
future multi-family complex. A special variance was requested and received to reduce the minimum
land area frontage for the R-8 zone to achieve density goals.
Plat map from 2004 (PP04-009)
The original application contemplated 11 office lots on approximately 19 acres. This change reduced the
total office area by 6.8 acres.
There was still quite a bit of land west of the R-8 area that would have been buffered by offices,
however that was built for use by Citadel Storage in 2015.
This design was still thoughtful and intelligent as smaller lots (the R-8 area) for single family dwellings
such as town homes were intended to serve as a transition between the commercial areas and the
single family (R-4) areas of the development to the south and east.
It was not until 2015 that we a development request within the original Sutherland Downs Development
that seemed contrary to the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
Though the Planning & Zoning Commission’s recommendations to limit the apartments to 2 stories was
somewhat helpful, the current development application conflicts with the City of Meridian
Comprehensive Plan in these ways:
1) Mixed Use areas are typically developed under a master or conceptual plan; during an
annexation or rezone request, a development agreement will typically be required for
developments with a Mixed Use designation. That was the case here as well. The area now
proposed as apartments had been planned as an office area buffer for the single family homes.
The location that had been accepted for the proposed multi-family dwellings was developed
differently per PP04-009. The master conceptual plan has yet to provide the promised
development of light office and services to serve the community.
2) This area is miles from a grocery store, does not have access to mass transit and does not even
have easy (right turn) access to Eagle Road.
3) The master development plan had promised office areas to provide employment. That area has
already been greatly reduced, now the developer is requesting to reduce it further by adding
apartment buildings.
4) The City of Meridian plan indicates, “A desirable project would consider the placement of
parking areas, fences, berms, and other landscaping features to serve as buffers between
neighboring uses. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and
materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate high
quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design.” This proposed
development does not offer a buffer or quality materials such as ample use of stone or masonry
to meet the CC&Rs of the community.
5) The City of Meridian Plan states, “Within residential areas the following policies shall apply:
• In residential areas, other residential densities will be considered without requiring a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment. However, the density can only be changed one “step” (i.e.,
from low to medium, not low to high, etc.). Going from R-4 directly to R-15 is more than one
step.
6) The proposed development does not even provide the minimum required landscape buffering
and does not provide any transitional buffering with the existing community.
7) The proposed development does not improve the livability, health, safety, well-being, and
quality of life for existing and future residents of Meridian’s Sutherland Farms or neighboring
Developments.
8) Development should comply with the items listed for development in all Mixed Use areas. The
original (Sutherland Farms) agreement for this area provided light office use to provide work
locations and provided adequate buffers. In fact, the original plan looked much like the “Mixed
Use Neighborhood Center Concept Diagram” (fig 3-2) from the City or Meridian Plan (below).
Here is another diagram also showing a buffer (which the proposed plan lacks). Note the open
space and substantial landscaping between apartments and single family lots. The section of
land being developed may be too small for such a buffer and apartment buildings. Is that any
reason for the City of Meridian make an exception to the plan that protects quality of life for its
citizens? This land may just not be an appropriate site for Apartments.
In the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan, Figures 3-1 through 3-5 all demonstrate the use of
substantial buffers between residential R-4 and other uses. This extensive use of drawn
examples indicates how important these buffers are to quality of life per the City of Meridian’s
Comprehensive Plan.
Again and Again the City of Meridian Comprehensive plan stresses the importance of a buffer
between types. Density and use changes are made one step at a time. It is important. It is wise.
We want that for our subdivision also.
Based on the City’s published plan, and given the remaining unplatted land, it would make more
sense to develop the land in question with an R-8 buffer of townhomes and or duplexes and
four-plexes along the R4 border. The “Orchards” at Cloverdale and Ustick is a fine example of a
development that is quite attractive and functional.
Whatever is allowed on this small Easy Jet group of lots is going to set a precedent. Developing
this land to provide a buffer in accordance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive plan would
also protect the quality of life, neighborhood, and property values of the remaining 14 single
family homes that border the unplatted land adjoining this plot to the south, as well as the
surrounding residential area. All we are asking is that the City stand by the guidelines of its own
plan, and require the setback requirements to be met, require a buffer to the existing R-4
residential and allow changes in density/use in only one step at a time.
14 Family homes along the unplatted land. Some of them single story. The proposed apartments are just
to the north of the unplatted land.
9) On the topic of developments having to comply with the items agreed upon for mixed use in the
master plan, here is an excerpt from the CC&Rs for our community. We would expect any new
development in the previously defined Sutherland Farms area to meet these architectural
requirements as well as other CC&Rs for our community. We would like assurance that any
new development within the Sutherland Farms subdivision be required to meet the existing
CC&Rs. Below is a small excerpt.
10) The City of Meridian Comprehensive plan states, “Mixed Use Community (MU-C). The purpose
of this designation is to allocate areas where community-serving uses and dwellings are
seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric.” Building an apartment complex in very close
proximity to single family residences on a parcel that is really too small to accommodate it and
with no buffer does not serve the community or integrate seamlessly. Especially when the
existing community has high architectural standards which the apartment complex designs have
not promised to meet. Here again, a buffer R-8 between the R-4 and the R15 would be ideal,
and would comply with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
11) The City of Meridian Comprehensive plan quite wisely states, “Developments should provide
neighborhood accessible commercial services that do not force residents onto arterial streets.”
Unfortunately, the proposed plan for EASY JET SUBDIVISION APPLICATION (RZ 15‐012, PP 15‐
016, CUP 15‐017) does not accomplish this. There is little in the way of commercial services in
the area without accessing Eagle Rd, Victory, or Overland. There are not any grocery stores for
miles and there is no transit service. Further, placing a high density R-15 development in this
location, where their only access to an arterial is by making a left onto Easy Jet at a point so
close to Eagle Rd that traffic already backs up there, is certainly going to force those residents to
make a left and travel through the existing residential side streets which were not designed for
arterial use and do not provide the visibility and safety needed to handle the excess traffic.
12) The City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan also states, “Housing within developments should be
arranged in a radiating pattern of lessening densities from the core.” Once again, this implies
the wisdom of a buffer. Jumping from R-4 to R15 in a space too tight to provide an adequate
landscape buffer does not comply with this plan.
13) Here is another quote from the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan, “Alleys and roadways
should be used to transition from dissimilar land uses, and between residential densities and
housing types.” The proposed Easy Jet plan places a 39’4” three story building just 40 feet from
the nearest single family residence. There is no alley, or roadway, nor any other significant
buffer.
14) The proposed development does not meet the promised percent of work opportunities or
services to the existing community in an area where work and services could be used (amended
Sutherland Farms development agreement PP04-009). Meanwhile, there are many vacant lots
within a few miles of this site that are walking distance from ample work and services along the
Overland Corridor. The development as proposed denies us the work and service opportunities
that were promised in the Master Plan for Sutherland Farms, while at the same time adversely
competing with areas where R-15 zoning and apartments would make more sense.
In summary, REVISED EASY JET SUBDIVISION APPLICATION (RZ 15‐012, PP 15‐016, CUP 15‐
017) proposes to rezone from R-4 to R-15 in an area too small to provide an adequate buffer. The
proposed plan is contrary to the City of Meridian Comprehensive plan on a number of fronts (detailed
above). The decision that the City of Meridian makes on this project will set a precedent. There are 14
homes bordering the additional unplatted lands along the west edge of Eagle Rd. We the citizens of
Meridian invested our savings in homes in a high quality development. We knew the remaining land
was R-4. We knew that it had been part of the initial overall development plan to be used as light
office/services. We knew that the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan would require a buffer to
protect our quality of life. We knew that the City of Meridian Plan states that jumps in density could not
exceed one step. We trust that you will not sacrifice the City’s published design values for the benefit of
one developer to the detriment of an established community and the communities surrounding as well.
We ask that you please reject the proposed Easy Jet Apartment plan and oversee development of this
area in a way in line with the City’s published comprehensive plan; with a buffer for the existing
community. A buffer of townhomes, or the development of offices and services as were originally
promised to be included in the Sutherland Farms Master Development Plan. Services such as a grocery
store, coffee shop, dining, and other services that would make this area “walk-able” and add value for
the neighborhoods and business parks surrounding this area.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Joanne St Charles and Robert Nelson.
3482 E Yesternight St. Meridian, ID 83642