Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPackard Acres No. 3 AZAZ 04-005 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING April 15, 2004 APPLICANT Packard Estates Development, LLC ITEM NO. ~ Z REQUEST Public Hearing -Request for annexa#ion and zoning of 5.27 acres from RUT to R-4 zones for proposed Packard Acres Subdivision No. 3 -south of East Ustick Road and east of North Locust Grove Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: COMMENTS See altaehed Staff Comments No Comment See attached Comments No Comment ~.C~lrV1,VV~d~ ~Q~ov~V `~v ~/I OTHER: See affidavit Of sling / Letter ftom Dale and Helen Sharp n~1~1 Contacted: Dater-13--~~ Pone: ~~` ~ ~f!C,y~ Emailed:~~~ ~ 11nrLSCV~~Lev~- Stafflnffials: Material resen ed at public meeNnpa shall become property of the Meridian. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208)466-9272 • Fax 466.4405 Tawmy de Weerd CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CTTY COUNCIL MEMBERS 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT William L.M. Nary (208) 898-5500 ~ Fax 887-1297 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Kean Bira (208) 888-0433 ~ FAX (208) 887-0813 PLANNING AND ZONING Shaun Wardle City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-0218 DEPARTMENT Charles M. Rountree (208) 884-5533 ~ FAX 8886854 Transmittal Date: April 12, 2004 STAFF REPORT: P&Z Hearing Date: April 15, 2004 ~ To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission RE CEI V .1~ I~ From: Brad Hawkins-Clark, Principal City Planner Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech APR 1 2 200 City Of lYleridian Re: Packard Acres No. 3 Subdivision City Clerk Office • Annexation and Zoning of 5.27 Acres from RUT to R-4 (Low Density Residential), by Packard Estates Development, LLC (Fide No. AL-04-00.~ Preliminary Plat for Twenty (20) Building Lots and Two (2) Other Lots on 5.27 Acres in a Proposed R-4 Zone, by Packard Estates Development, LLC (File No. PP-04-00~. We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as conditions of approval These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS S171_-T1ViARY The applicant, Packard Estates Development, LLC, has applied for annexation and zoning and preliminary plat approval of twenty (20) building lots and two (2) other lots on 5.27 acres of land on the west side of Wingate Lane (private), approximately 2,000 feet south of Ustick Road. There are two (2) separate county parcels and one (1) existing house within the boundaries of the proposed plat. The subject property is an infill parcel, as defined by Meridian City Code (MCC), and is surrounded by single family detached residential subdivisions on the east, west and north boundaries. The land is designated as Medium Density Residernial on the Future Land Use Map and the applicant has requested all of the property be zoned R-4. The proposed subdivision includes public street access via two (2) existing stub streets from Packard Acres No. 2 to the north (N. Lapis Ave. and N. Devlin Ave.) and one (1) existing stub street from Packard Acres No. 1 to the east (E. Meadowgrass St.). E. Challis Street on the north end of the parcel is already constmcted with curb, gutter and sidewalk. The Ada County Highway District (ACRD) approved the subdivision with conditions on Apri17, 2004 on consent agenda. The proposed building lots are standard R-4 sizes with a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet. The gross density of the proposed subdivision is 3.49 dwelling units per/acre. This complies with the Comprehensive Plan future land use designation of Medium Density Residential (up to 8 PeoFmd Aum 3AZ.PP A204005. PP-04-006 Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council April 15, 2004 (P&Z Hearing Date) Page 2 du/acre). The plat contains approximately 4.9% open space (excluding the 15' wide private road easement for Wingate Lane), which is just below the required open space requirement of MCC 12-13-16-2. It is proposed as a single phase development. A Variance application was submitted separately for a proposed reduction to the front setback for the existing house on Lot 21, Block 5 from 20 feet to 13.7 feet. On September 2, 2003, the Meridian City Council approved astaff-initiated application (FP-03- 038), which removed two of the Packard Acres No. 2 Final Plat conditions. The application was submitted due to a lack of clarity and enforceability in the way two conditions were approved regarding the maintenance and crossing of Wingate Lane. Specifically, the application removed a condition that a gate be constructed on E. Challis Street on both sides of Wingate Lane and a condition which required the developer to repair any damages to Wingate Lane that were caused by contractors. The application did not amend conditions related to the Wingate Lane private road easement and access restrictions to the lane. This report rewmmends that the same conditions be applied to lots that abut Wingate Lane in order to maintain consistency. Staff is recommending approval of both subject applications with conditions. We are, however, recommending the subdivision reconfigure the open space and add an additiona1220 square feet of open space to comply with MCC 12-13-16-2. LOCATION The property is located on the west side of Wingate Lane (private), approximately 2,000 feet south of Ustick Road. It is located in Township 3 N, Range 1 E., Section 5. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North: Packard Acres Subdivision No. 2, zoned R-4 West: Chateau Meadows East Subdivision, zoned R-8. East: Packard Acres Subdivision No. 1, caned R-4. South: An unplatted, 5-acre parcel with a single family residence and several outbuildings, zoned RUT. OWNERS OF RECORD The property owner of record is Packard Estates Development, LLC. Wirt Edmonds, representing the owner, has provided notarized consent to Tealey's Land Surveying for submission of the applications. ANNEXATION & ZONING ANALYSIS According to Ordinance 11-IS-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, both the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment." AZ~°9-0~5. PP-04-006 Paclm~d Aaea 3AZ.PP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council April 15, 2004 (P&Z Hearing Date) Page 3 The following is the list of standards found in 11-15-11 and analysis by staff: A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application fora Comprehensive Plan amendment; Staff finds that the proposed zoning designation, R-4, is harmonious with and in accordance with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map, which designates the land to be Medium Density Residential. There is a minimum tazget density of three (3) du/acre in the Comprehensive Plan and Packazd Acres No. 3's gross density is 3.49 du/acre. In addition, Chapter VII of the Plan encourages infill development and the connectivity of subdivisions, which this subdivision accomplishes. B. is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be rezoned in the future; Staff does not anticipate that the applicant intends to rezone the subject property in the future. Besides the 5-acre, undeveloped parcel to the south (owned by the Sharps), there aze several large, undeveloped county parcels to the north of the site on the south side of Ustick Road. Rewne applications aze anticipated on these parcels in the future. C. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning -for example, a residential area turning into a commercial area by means of conditional use permits; Staff finds that the proposed single family residential subdivision would be allowed within the requested zoning district of R-4. The accompanying preliminary plat demonstrates the land will be developed in lot sizes, housing types and other dimensional requirements that conform to the new zoning. D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area; Staff finds that the land directly north, west and east of the subject property is annexed and constructed similaz to the proposed subdivision (Packard Acres and Chateau Meadows East subdivisions). The majority of the subject section (T'3N, R1E, 5) is designated for residential development similar to the proposed project. Stafffinds there is adequate public street infrastructure, emergency access and other municipal services to serve this infill site. The proposed number of new units (20) is not anticipated to create a demand that the existing infrastructure cannot handle. E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be. harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character Peckmd Acres 3AZ.PP AT.OA.005, PP-01-006 Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council April 15, 2004 (P&Z Hearing Date) Page 4 of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds that the proposed single family residernial use will have some change impact on the existing character of the adjacent county parcel to the south. The intended character of the subject parcel and the immediate vicinity is low to medium density residential uses. The proposed use conforms with the Future Land Use Map. The design and density conforms to the Comprehensive Plan policies. To avoid street maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway, ACHD is requiring the applicant to pane Wingate Lane at its irnersections with E. Meadowgrass Street and E. Challis Street its full width and at least 30-feet beyond the edge of the concrete sidewalks. F. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; The Commission and Council should rely on public testimony (oral and written} to determine whether or not the proposed uses will be disturbing or hazardous to the existing or fixture neighboring uses. Staff does not anticipate that the proposed residential uses will be hazardous as long as construction traffic and house construction is conducted in a manner consistent with Meridian City Code. G. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; Staff fmds that the property to be annexed will or can be served adequately by essential public facilities and services if all conditions of approval are met by the applicarn. All public streets that can be extended into the property are proposed to be extended and utilized. The applicant will be required to extend water and sewer lines to and through the proposed development, thereby making them available to the undeveloped property to the south. The applicant and/or future property owners will be required to pay park and highway impact fees as well as construct on-site storm water drainage facilities. Please review ACHD, Police and the Fire Department's commems concerning this subdivision for fixrther information regarding public services and facilities. H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will oot be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; Staff finds that there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost for public services and facilities, if the applicant complies with the conditions of approval for the accompanying conditional use permit and preliminary plat applications. AZ-04-0O5, PP-0~~006 Peclm~d Acres 3.AZ.PP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council April 15, 2004 (P&Z Hearing Date) Page 5 I. Will the proposed uses not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; Staff recognizes that traffic and noise will increase upon build-out of the proposed subdivision. ACHD projects the development will generate 200 additional vehicle trips per day. However, staff does not feel that the amount generated will be detrimental to the public welfare if all City and ACRD conditions of approval are met. Staff finds that the proposed subdivision will not involve uses that would create other nuisances that would be detrimental to the general welfare of the surrounding area. J. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Staff finds that the applicant's companion preliminary plat demonstrates the vehicular approaches and public streets will be designed in a logical and safe manner. In addition, the ACHD Commission approved the preliminary plat application and the proposed vehicular approaches/access points. The Commission and Council should review ACHD commerns concerning vehicular approaches and traffic generation. K Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and Staff finds that no natural or scenic features'of major importance will be lost or damaged by approving the annexation and rezone. Any existing trees larger than 4" caliper that are removed shall be mitigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance. L. 1$ the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian. (Ord. 592, i1-17-1992)Y Staff finds that all essernial services are available or will be provided by the developer to the subject property and will not require unreasonable expenditure of public funds. The applicant is proposing to develop the land in substantial compliance with the City's comprehensive plan (medium density residential) and infill policies/goals. The land east, west and north of the subject property has already been annexed and this is a logical expansion of existing zoning and land uses. ANEXATION AND ZONING CONDTIONS OF APPROVAL The legal description submitted with the applicarion (dated 2-13-04, stamped by David N. Marks) shows the property as comiguous to the existing corporate boundary of the City of Meridian and is approved. AZ-04-005, PP-04-006 Peclm~d Ac~a 3.AZ.PP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council April 15, 2004 (P&Z Hearing Date) Page 6 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are available from the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate in•igation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the Meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature. 4. Any future subdivision, uses and construction on this property shall comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time. PRELIlI-IINARY PLAT FINDINGS AND REQUIREMENTS Sections 12-3-3 7.2 and 12-3-5 D read as follows: "In determining the acceptance of a proposed subdivision, the Commission/Council shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the following: a. The conformance of the subdivision with the Comprehensive Development Plan; Staff finds that the proposed application is in substantial compliance with the adopted Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan (Chapter VI)). The proposed density, 3.49 du/acre (gross), is in compliance with the land use classification, medium density residential, noted on the map. b. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development; Staff finds that public services aze available to accommodate the proposed development. (See the findings under "Annexation and Zoning" for more detail.) c. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement program; Staff finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. d. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Staff recommends the Commission and Council rely upon comments from the public service providers (i.e. police, fire, ACHD, etc) to determine this finding. AZD0.005, PP-01-006 Pecked AUes 3 AZ.PP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council April 15, 2004 (P&Z Hearing Date) Page 7 e. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the Commission's attention. Staff finds that there are no other health, safety or environmental problems associated with the proposed development. PRELIMINARY PLAT SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS Ooen Space Acreaee: MCC 12-13-16-2 requires all residential subdivisions of five (5) acres or more to provide a minimum of five (5) percent of the gross land area as open space. Excluding the Wingate Lane easement, the combined open space of Lots 15 and 22, Block 5 equals 11,258 square feet, which is 220 square feet below the required amount (11,478 sq. ft.). Staff does not consider Wingate Lane as eligible open space. Although associated with the existing Packard Acres Subdivision, this is technically a new preliminary plat and is therefore subject to all current subdivision ordinances. The site, would not meet the required findings for a variance application. The Applicant will need to revise the plat to include the required five (5) percent of open space. (See Site Specific Condition #1.) 2. Oven Space Location: Both the Meridian Police Department and P&Z Department staff have concerns about the location and lack of natural surveillance opportunities of the open space on Lot 22, Block 5. The usable area (exclusive of Wingate Lane) is less than 45 feet wide and is likely to be enclosed with a six (6) foot solid fence along both the east and west boundaries (approx. 195 feet long). We do not believe the location meets the intent of MCC 12-13-16 to provide an accessible and usable area for the benefit of all future residents. Staff recommends the Applicant revise the plat to locate the open space further to the west in a more accessible area of the subdivision (reference MCC 12-13-16-4). (See Site Specific Condition #2 and MPD condition #1.) STTE SPECIFIC CONDTfIONS OF APPROVAL (PRELIMINARY PLATT 1. At least ten (10} days prior to the next public hearing, submit a revised preliminary plat that complies with MCC 12-13-16-2. 2. At least ten (10) days prior to the next public hearing, submit a revised preliminary plat which relocates the open space to a more accessible and visible area within the subdivision, as determined by the P&Z Commission. 3. At the P&Z Commission public hearing, the Applicant shall clarify the construction type, materials and height of perimeter fencing proposed for the subdivision. Said fencing agreed upon at the P&Z Commission hearing shall be a requirement of the final plat application. 4. The existing residence shown on Lot 21, Block 5 shall take its primary access off of E. Meadowgrass Street. The existing driveway shall be terminated at the east property line. AL04400, PP-04-000 PenlmN At+~3.AZ.PP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council April 15, 2004 (P&Z Hearing Date) Page 8 5. If the subject application is approved, the following conditions shall be placed on the final plat: a. Access to Wingate Lane is specifically prohibited. b. Widen the Wingate Lane private road easement width to twenty (20) feet for the distance adjacent to the plat boundary to match the Packard Acres No. 2 width. c. The developer shall have their attorney draw up a release of dominant parcel interest in the private lane easement and record it prior to signature on the final plat. Also, provide a recorded copy of deed restrictions to prohibit access to Wingate Lane and forbid gates or removal of permanent fencing on these lots prior to applying for building permits. 6. A permanent fence matching the existing Packard Acres No. 2 materials shall be constructed by the developer on the western boundary of the Wingate Lane road easement. 7. All azeas being counted toward the 5% open space requirement shall be free of "wet ponds" or other such nuisances. All stormwater detention facilities incorporated into the required open space are subject to Ordinance 12-13-14 and shall be fully vegetated with grass and trees, as depicted on the submitted landscape plans. 8. Please submit any up-to-date .groundwater monitoring data to the Public Works Department for review. All drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water will percolate or discharge within a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all storms up to and including a 100-year storm event. Side slopes within drainage areas shall not exceed 3:1. The project engineer should pay close attention to the results of field studies determining the groundwater, soil type & and characteristics during the design and construction phases. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above groundwater. 9, Sanitary sewer service to this site shall be via main line extensions from an existing main installed adjacent to the property. The applicant will be responsible to construct sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide service. 10. Domestic water service to this site shall be via main line extensions from mains installed adjacent to the property. The applicant will be responsible to construct water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide service. 11. The applicant has not indicated who will own and operate the pressurized irrigation AZ04-0O5, PP-04-006 PecksN A: to 3.AZ.PP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council April I5, 2004 (P&Z Hearing Date) Page 9 system within this development. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all lots within this development. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to remain a private homeowners' association system, complete plans and specifications shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual shall be submitted prior to plan approval. The Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, asingle-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 12. Applicant shall submit ten (10) copies of revised plat and landscape plans prior to the next public hearing on this application. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PRELIlVIINARY PLATT 1. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2. Sidewalks shall be installed within the subdivision and on the perimeter of the subdivision pursuant to MCC 12-13-10-8. Please submit with the final plat application a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's approval letter for the subdivision name, and the lot and block numbering. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 4. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat. A detailed landscape and fencing plan, in compliance with the landscape and subdivision ordinance, shall be submitted for the subdivision with the final plat application. 6. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. One-hundred-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 8. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that AZ~04-0O5, PP--04-006 PackeN Au+~ 3.AZ.PP Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council April 15, 2004 (P&Z Hearing Date) Page 10 were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be mitigated. 9. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 10. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Depamnent for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 11. Applicarn's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statemern certifying that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDTTIONS 1. One and two family dwellings will require afire-flow of 1,000 gallons per minute available for duration of 2 hours to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart. International Fire Code Appendix D 2. Final Approval of the fire hydrarn locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Departmern. a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 '/z" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle. b. The Fire hydrarn shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works spec. d. Locations with fire hydrants shall have the curb painted red 10' to each side of the hydrant location. e. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners. f. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'. 3. All entrance and internal roads shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside. 4. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before combustible construction begins. MERIDLAN POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS The proposed plat does not offer natural surveillance opportunities of the public areas. Prior to the next public hearing, the applicant shall meet with the Police Chief and/or Planning Staff to discuss features that increase visibility, including but not limited to: doors and windows that look out on the public areas, front porches, and adequate nighttime lighting. The site plan and/or landscaping plan shall be revised in accord with those discussions. SANTTARY SERVICE COMPANY CONDTCIONS ATAb905, PP-09-006 Pac6'ad Aces 3.AZ.PP MAYOR ~-~ ~~' " ~' ~ LEGAL DEPARTMENT Tam d W d • " ~ (208) 466-9272 • FAX 466-4405 my e eer _ . ; g!7~ U TY OF L _ _ ., ~ PARKS & RECREATION CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS (~ "-, ~ "~~ " (208) 888-3579 • Fax 898-5501 Shaun Wazdle / ~~~~/L \ ` y ~e PUBLIC WORKS Wi(]iam L. M. Nary IDAHp ~ (208) 898-5500 • Fax 887-1297 Charles M. Rountree T ~% ~ c BUILDING DEPARTMENT 208 8 e ~e " ( ) 87-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Keith Bird A ° ~ Tkensuae v.~ ~ sirs[ " 1903 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submk your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: April 8, 2004 Transmittal Date: March 9, 2004 File No.: AZ 04-005 Hearing Date: April 15, 2004 Request: Annexation and of 5.27 acres from RUT to R-4 zones for Packard Acres Subdivision No. 3 By: Packard Estates Development, LLC Location of Property or Project: south ~ FaM I Iarh~r R„~a anA eaM s ~t..w~. ~ ,._..... .. __--_ ..__~ David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) David Moe, P2 (NO VAR, VAC, FP) Wendy Newton-Huckabay, P2 (No vaR, vac) Michael Rohm, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP) Keith BoNp, P2 (No VAR, VAC, FP) Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Bill Nary, C/C Charlie Rountree, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Shaun Wardle, C/C ter Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP) Building Department Fire Department Police Department ~ City Attorney Your Concise RI City Engineer City Planner Packs Department ~ ~ ~ ' ~,'~,! d t) tom` . ~~ .-,~ ,~ MaK > > rh~,, °~,,, r~,-•-rA~.::,kr r:.Yn~~ I~r.i'.'.i ry~~15. 1.~'S~~7 Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FPiPP Only) Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central DistrtG Health Nampa Meridian brig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FPiPP Dory) Owest (FP/PP only) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP only) Bureau of ReGamation (FP/PP Only) Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County (Annexation only) Ada County Land Records (FPiPP Dory) Meridian Development Corporation Preservation Commission ~A-e ,; •e ii:J iav ~'Y S'.`xS i:a.2L ~L'p'~ 33 EAST IDAHO AVE13i1$•• MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 s- CENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT ~• DISTRICT Return to: C HEALTH Environmental Hea~Q~~q~IvED ^ Boise DEPARTMENT ^ Eagle Rezone # ft~ ~ ~{ - ~~ MAR 1 6 200~f ^ Garden City Conditional Use # CitgofMeriaian ~ileridian ^ Kuna "~-°~~J--~ ~ /Final /Short Plat ^ ACZ ^ Star ^ 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil gonditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ or bedrock from original grade O other ^ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and ~y water availability. ¢~8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: / central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ~9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division o~nvironmental Quality entral sewage d ommunity sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines entral water Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store Please see attached stormwater management recommendatations Date: -~ I l~ NNN^15. Reviewed By:~~ ~oHO~o,k~ Review Sheet CENTRAL ~~~ DISTRICT ~ HEALTH ~~~ DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFI[E • 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL. • BOISE, ID 83704-0825 •-(208) 375-5211 • FAX 327-8500 To prevent and treat disease and disabiliq; ro promote healfhp lifestyles; and to protect m+d promote the Ireafth and qu¢lelp ojour environment. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that storm water bepre-treated prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for storm water disposal and design a storm water management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities and Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, July 1997. Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, May 2000. uw.i:mmos Serving Valley, Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties Ada 1 Boise Lounty Office Elmore County Office Valley County Office 707 N. ArmsVOng PI. 520 E: 8th 51. North 703 N. 1st St. Boise, ID 83704 Mountain Home, ID 83647 P.0. Box 144E Endm. Heal[h: 327J499 Endro. Health: 587-9225 _ McCall, ID 83638 Family Planning: 327-7400 Family Health: 58i-4407 Ph. 634-i 154 Immunizations: 327-7450 WIC: 587-4409 FAX: 634-2174 Senior Nutrition: 327-7460 FAX: 587-352! WIC: 327-7488 FAX: 327-6500 RECEIVED MAR 2 5 204 City Of Meridian City Clerk' Offiee `~~r~~r '/fitLGZL L/CQ>~LLCt 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 1$ Maa~h, 2004 William G. Berg Jr. 33 East Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 121?J: AZ llq-(!OS P, Subdivision No. 3 Dear Will: Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no comment on the above referenced application for Annexation and Zoning of 5.27 cares from RUT to R-4 zones for proposed Packard Acres Subdivision No. 3. Sincerely, r,~ A oh.1 P. Andersor. -- Water Superintendent NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT JPA/dbg C: Boazd of Directors Secretary/Treasurer Asst. Water Superintendent File APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 1,.. STATE OF IDAHO ) COUNTY OF ADA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING R,ECEIVEj~ ,,.~~2~, {•I. re. CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE I, Mike Amold. Premier Signs Inc. 2100 E. Fairview Avenue Suite 7 855-0380 (name) (address} (phone) Meridian Idaho ,being first duly sworn upon (city) (state) oath, depose and say: I personally posted the subject properly with the hearing notice sign 10 days prior to the public hearing for the _a_nnexation and preliminary plat of Packard Acres #3 Subdivision. Dated this 26"d. day of March , 2004 ignature) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. e~ ~a~ ~~ ~ '` ?~ i'~~~C, g Z pU0 .~`O~, •~r~ ~•H.•'R ~` dam, ~'•o. S TA TE ~.d•`• otary Public fo~/r Idaho Residing at ~A~ My Commission Expires: 2 O Master~affid-posting y _~ -0`~ ~~I'~~~~i March 20, 2004 MAR 3 ' 200~f Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission s'ity OfMerirliats. City of Meridian C%i(;y Clerl~ Office This is in regard to the public hearing scheduled for April t5, 2004, for the purpose of reviewing application of proposed Packard Acres Subdivision No. 3. As residents of North Wingate Lane and since our property is located directly South of the proposed Packard Acres r Subdivision No. 3 we wish to restate our position concerning use, access ar development activities that could affect Noth Wingate Lane. First, construction activities are not to impede our access of North Wingate Lane to and from our property to Ustick. Second, any houses built along North Wingate Lane will not have access from the the lane. The property owners on the lane recorded and notorized a document on July 25, 1973 establishing this as a private lane and Ada County has already ruled that Third, construction equipment will be prohibited from using N~h Wingate Lane to access and conduct development activities on proposed site. Fourth, to allow for emergency vehicle access to our property ,North Wingate Lane should be widened to 20' from E. Challis to our property as was required for the portion of the lane North of E. Challis..Safety and liability issues are a major concern relative to unrestricted access by emergency and other authorized vehicles. Fifth, but not necessarily the last, as residents most directly affected by development activities on this proposed site we, as well as the City of Mardian, other governmental entities, developer, and contractors should hgve detailed knowledge of o~ conditions to proceed with any activifles. This could include expected fencing along lane, any sewer, weer, or irrigation projects inwlving Wingate Lane. Any other activates inwlving North Wingate Lane should be established and readly available to alt concerned before any activates are approved. Past history indicates need for established guidelines with affected parties before approve} is granted for proposed Packard Aces Subdivision No. 3. Sincer/e/ly, ~ ~/~ ©A~C9---j °~~ Dale and Helen Sharp SaWrdaY. Mare~20, 2400 AnKViea Onlinec ANBXMP Paga: 7