HomeMy WebLinkAboutACHD Comments
Ada County Highway District
3775 N. Adams Street
Dave E. Wynkoop 1st Vice President
Susan S. Eastlake, 2nd Vice President
Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner
Dave Bivens, Commissioner
Garden CitylD 83714-6499
Phone (208) 387-6100
FAX (208) 387-6391
E-mail:
April 9, 2004
RECENED
To: Packard Estates Development, LLC
6223 N. Discovery Way Suite 120 APR 16 2004
Meridian, Idaho 83642
City of Meridian
Subject: MPP-04-006/MVAR-04-002/MAZ-04-005 City Clerk Office
Packard Acres #3
2585 & 2576 N. Wingate Lane
On April 7, 2004, the Ada County Highway District Commission acted on your application for the
above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of
approval and street improvements, which are required.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact meat 208-387-6174.
Sincerely,
~..
i~ ~
Lori Den Hartog
Senior Development Analyst
Right-of-way & Development Services
Planning Division
CC: Planning & Development project file
City of. Meridian)
Construction Services
Drainage
Utilities
Tealey's Land Surveying 2501 Bogus Basin Road Boise, Idaho 83702
C Ada County Highway District
Development Process Checklist
®Submit a development application to a City or to the County
®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
®The ACRD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review
®The Planning Review Division will do one of the following:
^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific
requirements at this time.
^Send a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within <
platted subdivision or part of a previous development application and that the site
specific requirements from the previous development also apply to this
development application.
^Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the
transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District
Policy.
®Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the
transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District
Policy.
®The Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission
Level reports.
^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With"
letter:
The applicant should submit two (2) sets of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review
by the Development Review Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees.
(Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD, then architectural plans may
be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.)
The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY
work in the right-of-way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street
improvements and utility cuts.
^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan revie~
approval.
'„ ~
F
~'°~Ada County Highway District
Right-of--Way & Development Department
Planning Review Division
This application requires Commission action due to the history of Wingate Lane which abuts the site. !t is
was approved on the consent agenda on April 7, 2004 at 12 noon. Tech Review for this item was held with
the applicant on March 26, 2004. Please refer to the attachment for request for reconsideration guidelines.
Staff contact: Lori Den Hartog, phone: 387-6174, E-mail: Jdenhartop("2a achd.ada id.us
File Numbers: Packard Acres #3/MAZ04-005/MPP04-006/MVAR04-002
Site address: 2585 & 2576 N. Wingate Lane
Applicant/Owner: Packard Estates Development, LLC
6223 N. Discovery Way, Suite 120
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Representative: Tealey's Land Surveying
2501 Bogus Basin Road
Boise, Idaho 83702
Application Information:
The applicant has submitted the above referenced application to the City of Meridian requesting preliminary
plat, rezone, and annexation approval far the development of 20 residential lots and 2 common lots on 5.27-
acres. The site is located south of Ustick Road and west of Eagle Road at 2585 N. Wingate Lane.
Acreage: 5.27acres
Current Zoning: RUT
Proposed Zoning: R-4
Residential Lots: 20
Common Lots: 2
Vicinity Map
A. Findings of Fact
Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 190 additional vehicle trips per day (10
existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual.
2. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of a building
permit. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that
time.
3. Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was not required with this application.
4. Site Information: There is currently one residence on the site. The balance of the site is used for
agricultural purposes.
5. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
Direction Land Use Zoning
North Sin le-famil residential Packard Acres Subdivision #2 R-4-Ci of Meridian
South 5-acre sin le-famil arcel RUT-Ada Coun
East
West Sin le-famil residential Packard Acres Subdivision #1
Single-family residential (Chateau Meadows East Subdivision #8) R-4-Ci of Meridian
R-8-City of Meridian
6. Impacted Roadways
Roadway Frontage Functional Traffic Count Level of Speed Nearest
Classification Service* Limit Intersection
Ustick Road None Minor Arterial 10,833 west of Eagle Better 40 MPH Wingate
Road on 8/5103 than Lane-a stop
"C" controlled
intersection
Eagle Road None Principal Arterial 20,8182 south of Better 55 MPH Ustick Road-
Ustick Road on than "C" a signalized
10/29/02 intersection
Locust Grove None Minor Arterial 7,867 south of Ustick Better 35 MPH Ustick Road-
Road Road on 2/14/02 than "C" (south of a signalized
Ustick intersection
Road
E. Challis 514' Local No counts available N/A
Street
Win ate Lane 343' Local Private No counts available N/A
'Acceptable level of service for a two lane arterial roadway is "D" (14,000 VTD).
*Acceptable level of service for a five lane arterial roadway is "E" (37,000 VTD).
7. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site
• Ustick Road is currently improved with 2 travel lanes and occasional turn lanes for abutting
developments. There is curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the portions of Ustick Road which have
been developed/re-developed.
• Eagle Road is currently improved with 4 travel lanes and a center turn lane with no curb,
gutter or sidewalk.
2
• Locust Grove Road is currently improved with 2 travel lanes and a center turn lane with curb,
gutter, and sidewalk.
• E. Challis Street which abuts the site on the north property line was constructed with Packard
Acres Subdivision #2. It was constructed as a 36-foot street section with curb, gutter, and 5-
foot concrete sidewalk.
8. Existing Right-of-Way
• Ustick Road currently has 55 to 70-feet of right-of-way.
• Eagle Road currently has 140-feet of right-of-way.
• Locust Grove Road currently has 70 to 90-feet of right-of-way.
9. Existing Access to the Site
The existing residence takes access from Wingate Lane (a private road).
10. Site History
ACHD has not reviewed this site within the last year for a development application.
11. Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program
There are no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of the project that are currently
in the Five Year Work Program.
Ustick Road is scheduled to be widened to 5 lanes between Meridian Road and Cloverdale Road in
the Capital Improvements Plan in 11 to 15 years.
B. Findings for Consideration
Right-of-Way
Internal/Local Streets
District policy 7204.4.1 and Figure 72-F1A requires 50-feet of right-of-way on local streets. This right-
of-way allows for the construction of a 2-lane roadway with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete
sidewalks.
The applicant is proposing 50-feet ofright-of--way for al! of the fnterna! Iota! streets. This right-of-way
meets District policy and should be approved with this application.
2. Street Sections
Internal/ Local Streets
.District policy 7204.4.2 states, "developments with any buildable lot that is less that 1-acre in size will
typically provide streets having a minimum pavement width of 32-feet with curb, gutter and sidewalks.
The total street width shall be 36-feet from back-of-curb to back-of-curb. Variations of this width may
be allowed, depending on traffic volumes forecast to be generated by the development. Concrete
sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5-feet in width unless they are separated from the curb 5-feet or
more in which case the sidewalk shall be a minimum of 4-feet in width.
The applicant has proposed 36-foot street sections with 5-foot attached sidewalks. Thrs proposal
meets district policy and should be approved with this application.
3. Roadway Offsets
District policy 7204.11.6, requires-local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 125-feet from
another local roadway (measured centerline to centerline).
Al! of the internal streets offset 125-feet or more from one another.
4. .Stub Streets
District policy 7205.5 states that stub streets will be required to provide intro-neighborhood circulation
or to provide access to adjoining properties. Stub streets will conform with the requirements
described in Section 7204.5, 7204.6 and 7204.7, except a temporary cul-de-sac will not be required if
the stub street has a length no greater than 150-feet. A sign shall be installed at the terminus of the
stub street stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". In addition, a stub
street must meet the following conditions:
1. A stub street shall be designed to slope towards the street intersection and drain surface
water toward that intersection, uhless a satisfactory storm drain system is installed.
2. The District may require appropriate covenants guaranteeing that the stub street
will remain free of obstructions.
Connections
The applicant has proposed fo connect to and extend iwo existing stub streets, E. Meadowgrass
Street at the east property line and N. Devlin Avenue at the north property line. These connections
meet District policy and should be approved with this application.
New Stub Streets
The applicant has proposed to extend N. Devlin Place to the south property line approximately 130-
feet east of the west property line (measured property line to centerline). This location meets District
policy and should be approved with this application.
5. Driveways
Offsets
District policy F2-F4 (1) and 72-F4 (2), requires driveways located on local residential roadways to
offset a controlled and/or uncontrolled intersection a minimum of 50-feet (measured near edge to
near edge).
Widths
District Policy 7207.9.3 restricts residential driveways to a maximum width of 20-feet.
Pavinu
Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked
onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant should be required to
pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the
roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
6. Wingate Lane
Wingate Lane is a private road easement that extends south from Ustick Road for approximately 113
of a mile. The stub street E. Meadowgrass Street, which is being extended into the site from the east
property line, will be constructed across Wingate Lane. The applicant has provided for a15-foot wide
4
private road easement along the east property line of this site for the continued use of Wingate Lane
for the property owners adjacent to the south. Those persons using Wingate Lane will have the
stopping motion; those using E. Meadowgrass Street will have a through drive.
Wingate Lane is an unpaved gravel roadway. To avoid maintenance problems due to gravel being
tracked onto the roadway, the applicant will be required to pave Wingate Lane at its intersections with
E. Meadowgrass Street and E. Challis Street its full width and at least 30-feet beyond the edge of the
concrete sidewalks.
C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval
Construct the internal local roadways (E. Meadowgrass Street and N. Devlin Avenue) as 36-foot
street sections with curb, gutter, and 5-foot concrete sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of-way.
2. Extend E. Meadowsgrass Street into the site across the private road easement for Wingate Lane at
the east property line.
3. Extend N. Devlin Avenue at the north property line into the site.
4. Construct N. Devlin Avenue as a stub street to the 5-acre parcel adjacent to the south of the site.
Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE
FUTURE."
5. Pave Wingate Lane at its intersections with E. Meadowgrass Street and E. Challis Street its full width
and at least 30-feet beyond the edge of the concrete sidewalks.
6. ,Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
D. Standard Conditions of Approval
Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way.
2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contacf the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details.
5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State
of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or
other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
7. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements
of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with
Ordinance #198, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant
shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking
ground within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in
the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction.
10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative
of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written
confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other
regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises
the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the
time the change in use is sought.
E. Conclusions of Law
The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are
satisfied.
2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/developmenttyill not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development.
Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Reconsideration Guidelines
6
7
1 ®®~S CALE 1VIAF' ~® F'
RACKARI~ ACRES N®. ~
A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4,
SECTION 5, T.3N., R.1E., B.M.,
MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
10 i 16 14 I ~ 12 I I
I ~ L~
II Iz ~~'
~~ I~ 17 18 19 20 21
14
~~' I Z
12 E. MEADOWGRASS ST.
I ~ I
13 I ~ I II 10 1~G 9 I 8 7 I 6
N.
0 50 100 200
SCALE IN FEET
I" = 100'
TEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING
2501 BOGl15 BASIN RD. e - BOISE, IDAHO 83702
206-385-0636
DATES DRAWING NO.~
FEBRAURY, 2003 2427-100 SCALE
'',
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action
Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD staff
or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request
reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action previously
requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried
out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties.
a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration,
but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners
present.
If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a
certain time.
b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later
than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following
the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the request,
the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next scheduled
regular Commission meeting.
c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new
facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has
developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of fact or
law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting.
d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it
occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACRD
staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which the matter
is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting
where the agenda notice so provides.
e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda: for Commission action,
interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the
President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take
any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable.
If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover
administrative costs, as established by the Commission.
8