HomeMy WebLinkAboutRoseleaf Subdivision AZ-04-002
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
CIC 04/06/04
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION)
AND ZONING OF 24.45 ACRES )
FOR PROPOSED ROSELEAF )
SUBDIVISION FROM RUT TO R-8, )
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF )
LOCUST GROVE ROAD, )
APPROXIMA TEL Y v.. MILE )
SOUTH OF VICTORY ROAD, )
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 )
EAST, SECTION 30, MERIDIAN, )
IDAHO)
)
)
)
Case No. AZ-04-002
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISION AND ORDER
GRANTING APPLICATION FOR
ANNEXATION AND ZONING
CENTENNIAL DEVELOPMENT,
APPLICANT
The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for public hearing
on April 6, 2004, at the hour of7:00 p.m., and Anna Powell Planning Director for the Planning
and Zoning Department, and Kevin Amar, appeared and testified, and the City Council having
duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore makes the following
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in
Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-16-1.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDIVISION
(AZ-O4-002)
PAGE 1 OF 16
2.
The City Council takes judicial notice of its zoning, subdivision and development
ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof,
and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted August 6, 2002,
Resolution No. 02-382, and maps and the ordinance Establishing the Impact Area Boundary.
3.
The property which is the subject of the application for annexation and
zoning is described in the application, is approximately 24.45 acres in size and is located on the
west side of Locust Grove Road, approximately Y. mile south of Victory Road, Township 3
North, Range 1 East, Section 30, Meridian, Idaho, all within the Area of Impact of the City of
Meridian and the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as defined in the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan.
4.
The owners ofrecord of the subject property are Tina lest Family LTD
Partnership (23.95 acres) and Richard Bell (1 acre), and both parties have submitted notarized
consent for the subject application. Applicant is Centennial Development, LLC.
5.
The property is presently zoned RUT (Ada County), and is currently has an
existing resident with other outbuildings.
6.
The Applicant requests the property be zoned as R-8 (Medium Density
Residential).
7.
The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner:
A residential subdivision with 98 buildable lots and 7 other/common lots.
9.
The Applicant requests zoning of the subject real property as R-8, which is
consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDIVISION
(AZ-O4-002)
PAGE2 OF 16
the subject property as Medium Density Residential.
10.
There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the
consideration of this application.
11.
The City Council recognizes the letter of concern ftom Wendel Bigham, Joint
School District No.2, expressed in his letter dated February 4, 2004.
12.
Giving due consideration to the comments received ftom the
governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction,
public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense
upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed:
A.
Adopt the Comments and Recommendations of the Meridian Planning and Zoning
Department as follows:
1.
The legal description submitted with the application (dated 1-23-04, stamped by D.
Terry Peugh) shows the property as contiguous to the existing corporate boundary of
the City of Meridian and is approved.
2.
Remove any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project ftom
their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are
available ftom the City of Meridian. . Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes
such as landscape irrigation.
3.
All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall be tiled per City
Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate
irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written
approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department. Iflateral users
association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the
Meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature.
4.
Any future subdivision, uses and construction on this property shall comply with the
City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDNISION
(AZ-O4-OO2)
PAGE 3 OF 16
B.
Adopt the Recommendations oftheACHD ftom their report dated March 1,2004 as follows:
1.
On February 25, 2004, the District acted on the Roseleaf Subdivision application
project, and the applicant shall be required to comply with the District's Site-Specific
Conditions of Approval, Standard Conditions of Approval, and street improvements.
C.
Adopt the Recommendations of the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District as follows:
1.
2.
3.
The District requires a Land Use Change Application be filed for review prior to final
platting for the District to know who is going to own, operate and maintain the
pressure irrigation system.
All laterals and waste ways must be protected. All municipal surface drainage must
be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, the District must review
drainage plans.
The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805.
D.
Adopt the action of the City Council taken at their April 6, 2004 meeting as follows:
For Clarification:
1.
2.
3.
4.
13.
The lot on which the existing house sits will now take access ftom the interior of
the subdivision. The existing house currently encroaches within the landscape
buffer area due to its location, so what is presently the ftont yard will become the
back yard and will be fenced appropriately ftom the right-of-way. Since the
existing house does not contain a garage, the applicant shall work with the
Planning and Zoning Department to come up with a feasible location for
placement of a garage for the existing house, and said garage shall meet the
Planning and Zoning Department's approval.
The overall project shall have a six-foot cedar fence, and the ftontages will have a
six-foot vinyl fence on Locust Grove with a four-foot vinyl fence around the parks
and open space.
The rear common area shall provide a five-foot-wide paved pathway.
The applicant shall be required to comply with all the conditions and requirements
of the corresponding Preliminary Plat, PP-04-00 I.
It is found that the proposed zoning designation, R-8, is hannonious with and in
FWOmGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIDNS OF LAW
AND DECISIDN AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDIVISION
(AZ-O4-O02)
PAGE4 OF 16
accordance with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map, which designates the land
to be Medium Density Residential. There is a minimum target density of three (3) du/acre in the
Comprehensive Plan and Roseleafs gross density is 4.00 du/acre. The Future Land Use Map shows a
future community park in this square mile. However, the Parks Department is not seeking to acquire
any land ftom the applicant. In addition, the application cover letter lists several policies, all of
which support the annexation and proposed residential use.
There are two Comprehensive Plan policies which may not be fully complied with if the plat
that accompanies the annexation request is approved as submitted:
"Require street connections between subdivisions at regular intervals to enhance
connectivity and better traffic flow." (Ch. VI, Goal II, Obj. A, #6)
"(Within neighborhood centers), most blocks are 300' maximum." (Ch. VII,pg. 97)
As noted in the introduction, the northwest corner of this parcel (approximately200-
250 feet) abuts a future neighborhood center area. The second policy quoted above is
a design goal for all neighborhood centers. In order to encourage higher densities to
the northwest and to facilitate better movement of pedestrians and traffic ftom
Roseleaf Subdivision to the Caven parcel (future center), an additional stub street
shall be provided somewhere in this northwest corner of the project to the Caven
10M Trust parcel. Such a stub street would also provide for better connectivity with
Tuscany Village, which is building a stub street to the Caven 10M Trust parcel
approximately 630 feet north of Roseleafs north boundary.
14.
It is not anticipated that the applicant intends to rezone the subject property in fue
future. There are several large, undeveloped county parcels west and south of this land and
additional rezone requests are anticipated on these parcels in the future.
15.
It is found that the proposed single-family residential subdivision would be allowed
within the requested R-8 zone. The accompanying plat demonstrates the land would be developed in
lot sizes, housing types and other dimensional requirements that conform to the new zoning.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDIVISION
(AZ-O4-002)
PAGE 5 OF 16
16.
It is found that the land directly north and east of the subject property is annexed and
approved for development similar to the proposed subdivision (Tuscany Village and Tuscany Lakes
subdivisions). Sageland Subdivision, also zoned R-8, is a new, recently approved subdivision at the
northeast corner of Locust Grove and Victory Roads (approximately Y. mile to the north). The
majority of the subject section (T3N, RIE, 30) is designated for residential development similar to
the proposed project. This is the second annexation application the city has received within Section
30.
S. Locust Grove Road is not a classified roadway and is not programmed within ACHD's
Five Year Work Program or Capital Improvement Program.
17.
It is found that the proposed single-family residential use will impact the existing
character of the subject property and adjacent farmland (to west). The intended character of the
vicinity is a mix oflow and medium density residential to the south and east and more urban, higher
density/impact development to the northwest (neighborhood center). The proposed use conforms
with the Future Land Use Map. The design and density conforms to most of the Comprehensive Plan
policies (except possibly two, as noted in "B." above).
18.
It is not anticipated that the proposed residential uses will be hazardous as long as
construction traffic and house construction is conducted in a manner consistent with City Code.
19.
It is found that the property to be annexed will or can be served adequately by most
essential public facilities and services if all conditions of approval are met by the applicant.
However, the Meridian Police Department (MPD) and SSC have expressed serviceability concerns
with the four (4) lots that share a common driveway in Block 3 (Lots 12-15). The common driveway
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDIVISION
(AZ-O4-O02)
PAGE 6 OF 16
is approximately 170 feet long. MPD is concerned about their ability to respond to a crime or other
911 calls. They prefer to have more direct visibility into a residential property ftom a public street.
SSC is concerned about limited turning movements at the north end of the I70-foot common
driveway, especially if there are vehicles parked along the drive. In addition, because of liability
issues, SSC will not enter privately owned common driveways in residential subdivisions to pick-up
trash. MCC 4-I-I1.B.4 requires all trash cans "be placed as close to the curb as possible, orin alleys
if the property has alley access. The solid waste containers shall be clear of pedestrian and vehicular
traffic at all times. Solid waste containers shall be clearly visible and accessible to the waste
collection personnel and tree ftom obstructions including, but not limited to, trees, shrnbbery, fences,
vehicles, and walls." The impact of this ordinance on Lots 12-15, Block 3 is that property owners
will have to haul their trash cans 170+ feet ftom the residence to back of curb.
A new pedestrian connection ftom the common lot (Lot I, Block 3) into this quad of
homes shall be required. When MCC 12-4-14, Common Drive Design Standards, was adopted by
the City in June 2002, it is not believed the intent was to allow lots adjoining the common drive
that would not access the drive. Pertaining to MCC 12-4-14 the lots have been configured so that
only four (4) lots have ftontage and access on the common driveway, and said lots are Lots 16-
19, Block 3.
In addition, SSC is requesting a condition that all trash cans for Lots 12-15, Block 3 be
placed no more than five (5) feet behind the sidewalk off of Chatsworth Street.
The applicant shall be required to extend water mains to and through the proposed
development, thereby making them available to the adjacent properties. The applicant and/or future
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDIVISION
(AZ-O4-002)
PAGE 7 OF 16
property owners will be required to pay park and highway impact fees as well as construct on-site
storm water drainage facilities.
Review of the ACHD, Police and the Fire Department's comments concerning this
subdivision will provide further information regarding public services and facilities.
20.
It is found that there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost for
public services and facilities, if the applicant complies with the conditions of approval for the
accompanying preliminary plat (PP-04-00 I) application.
21.
It is recognized that traffic and noise will increase upon build-out of the proposed
subdivision. ACHD projects the development will generate 970 additional vehicle trips per day.
However, it is not felt that the amount generated will be detrimental to the public welfare if all City
and ACHD conditions of approval are met.
22.
The proposed new entry road, Claymont Street, is located to meet ACHD's offset
policy ftom the Tuscany Lakes Subdivision entry road (approximately 300 feet north), and this
location is supported. However, the existing residence ftonting Locust Grove Road (Bell property)
currently has two driveway entrances - one on the north side of the house and one on the south side.
ACHD required the southern driveway be closed. As traffic volumes increase on Locust Grove Road,
it is believed even the northern driveway may cause interference and become a potential hazard.
The long-term and cumulative result of these older residences taking direct access to arterial
streets is usually an increased number of hazard points for both vehicles and pedestrians. This is
especially true when the house has a minimum ftont setback such as this one (22 feet to future right-
of-way) and the off-street parking distance is limited. The drivewaylsidewalk intersections can also
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDMSION
(AZ-O4-002)
PAGE 8 OF 16
be more dangerous than street/sidewalk intersections where the crossing is clearly marked and ADA-
compliant with ramps, etc. In addition, SSC has stated that trash pick-up at locations such as this
tends to be more hazardous and difficult for their drivers, since they must back-up onto an
arterial/section line road. Large solid waste vehicles have blind spots when backing up is required.
98% of solid waste vehicle accidents occur when backing-up.
Based on the above, it is not believed this fmding can be made. It is required that Lot 5,
Block I take its street access internal to the development (off of Roseleaf Street) and that both
driveways be closed.
Review of the ACHD comments concerning vehicular approaches and traffic generation will
provide additional information. ACHD has approved the preliminary plat application.
23.
It is found that no natural or scenic features of major importance will be lot or
damaged by approving the annexation and rezone. Any existing trees larger than 4" caliper that are
removed shall be mitigated for, per the Landscape Ordinance MCC 12-13-13.
24.
It is found that all essential services are available or will be provided by the
developer to the subject property and will not require unreasonable expenditure of public funds.
The applicant is proposing to develop the land in substantial compliance with the City's
comprehensive plan (medium density residential). The land east and north of the subject
property has already been annexed and this is a logical expansion of existing zoning and land
uses. It is believed that it is in the best, long-term, interest of the City and its traveling public for
the existing residence to take its primary access internal to the subdivision.
25.
It is found that if the developer pays for the requested improvements
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDMSION
(AZ-O4-002)
PAGE 9 OF 16
and complies with the conditions set forth in these Findings of Fact No. 12, and all sub-parts, the
economic welfare of the City and its residents and tax and rate payers will be protected, a
condition of annexation and zoning designation.
26.
It is also found that the development considerations as referenced in Finding No.
12 are reasonable to require and must be taken into account, in order to assure the proposed
development is designed, constructed, operated and maintained in a manner which is harmonious
and appropriate in appearance with the existing, or intended character of the general vicinity, in
order to assure that the proposed use will not change the essential character ofthe affected
vicinity and will insure that the proposed uses will not be hazardous or disturbing to the existing,
or future neighboring uses, particularly considering the impact of proposed development on
potential to produce excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare and odors.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1.
The City of Meridian has authority to annex real property upon written request for
annexation and the real property being contiguous or adjacent to city boundaries and that said
property lies within the area of city impact as provided by Idaho Code Section 50-222. The
Meridian City Code § 11-16 provides the City may annex real property that is within the
Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
2.
The Council may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and
of actual conditions existing within the City and State.
3.
The City of Meridian has exercised its authority and responsibility as provided by
"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975", codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code by the
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDIVISION
(AZ-04-002)
PAGE 10 OF 16
adoption of the Amended Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted August 6, 2002,
Resolution No. 02-382.
4.
The following are found to be pertinent provisions ofthe City of Meridian
Comprehensive Plan and are applicable to this Application:
Chapter VIT.
5.
The zoning of (R-8) Medium Density Residential is defined in the Zoning Ordinance
at § 11-7-2 D as follows:
(R-8) Medium Densitv Residential District: The purpose of the R-8 District is to permit
the establishment of single- and two-family dwellings at a density not exceeding eight (8)
dwelling units per acre. This District delineates those areas where such development has or
is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City and is also designed to
permit the conversion of large homes into tow-family dwellings in well-established
neighborhoods of comparable land use. Connection to the Municipal water and sewer
systems of the City is required.
6.
Since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has
authority to place conditions upon the annexation ofland. See Burt vs. The City ofIdaho Falls, 105
Idaho 65, 665 P2d 1075 (1983).
7.
The development of the annexed land, if annexed, shall meet and comply with the
Ordinances of the City of Meridian including, but not limited to: Section 12-2-4 which pertains to
development time schedules and requirements; Section 12-4-13, which pertains to the piping of
ditches; and Section 12-5-2 N, which pertains to pressurized irrigation systems, and Zoning and
Subdivision and Development Ordinance of the City of Meridian.
8.
Pursuant to Section II-16-4A of the Zoning and Development Ordinance the owner
and/or developer shall enter into a Development Agreement, if such is required by the City.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDIVISION
(AZ-O4-002)
PAGE 11 OF 16
DECISION AND ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS
OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Couucil does hereby Order and this does
Order:
1.
The applicant's request for annexation and zoning of approximately 24.45 acres to
Medium Density Residential (R-8) is granted subject to the terms and conditions of this Order
hereinafter stated.
2.
The application is for annexation and zoning of 24.45 acres. The legal description
shall be prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor, Licensed by the State ofIdaho, and shall conform
to all the provisions of the City of Meridian Resolution No. 158. The legal description for
annexation must place this parcel contiguous to the Corporate City Limits per Ordinance No. 686.
3.
Developer shall be required to meet the conditions set forth and in the event the
conditions herein are not met by the Developer that the property shall be subject to de-annexation,
with the City of Meridian, which provides for the following conditions of development, to-wit:
A.
Adopt the Comments and Recommendations of the Meridian Planning and Zoning
Department as follows:
1.
The legal description submitted with the application (dated 1-23-04, stamped by D.
Terry Peugh) shows the property as contiguous to the existing corporate boundary of
the City of Meridian and is approved.
2.
Remove any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project ftom
their domestic service, per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517, when services are
available ftom the City of Meridian. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes
such as landscape irrigation.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDMSION
(AZ-04-002)
PAGE 12 OF 16
B.
C.
D.
3.
All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting,
crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the parcel shall be tiled per City
Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate
irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written
approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department. Iflateral users
association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the
Meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature.
4.
Any future subdivision, uses and construction on this property shall comply with the
City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time.
Adopt the Recommendations of the ACHD ftom their report dated March 1, 2004 as follows:
1.
On February 25, 2004, the District acted on the Roseleaf Subdivision application
project, and the applicant shall be required to comply with the District's Site-Specific
Conditions of Approval, Standard Conditions of Approval, and street improvements.
Adopt the Recommendations of the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District as follows:
1.
The District requires a Land Use Change Application be filed forreview prior to final
platting for the District to know who is going to own, operate and maintain the
pressure irrigation system.
2.
All laterals and waste ways must be protected. All municipal surface drainage must
be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, the District must review
drainage plans.
3.
The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805.
Adopt the action ofthe City Council taken at their April 6, 2004 meeting as follows:
For Clarification:
1.
The lot on which the existing house sits will now take access ftom the interior of
the subdivision. The existing house currently encroaches within the landscape
buffer area due to its location, so what is presently the ftont yard will become the
back yard and will be fenced appropriately ftom the right-of-way. Since the
existing house does not contain a garage, the applicant shall work with the
Planning and Zoning Department to come up with a feasible location for
placement of a garage for the existing house, and said garage shall meet the
Planning and Zoning Department's approval.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDIVISION
(AZ-O4-002)
PAGE 13 OF 16
2.
The overall project shall have a six-foot cedar fence, and the ftontages will have a
six-foot vinyl fence on Locust Grove with a four-foot vinyl fence around the parks
and open space.
3.
The rear common area shall provide a five-foot-wide paved pathway.
4.
The applicant shall be required to comply with all the conditions and requirements
ofthe corresponding Preliminary Plat, PP-04-001.
4.
The City Attorney shall prepare for consideration by the City Council the appropriate
ordinance for the annexation and zoning designation of the real property which is the subject of the
application to (R-8) Medium Density Residential District, and Meridian City Code § 11-7-2.
5.
Subsequent to the passage of the Ordinance provided for in section 4 of this Order the
engineering staff of the Public Works Department shall prepare the appropriate mapping changes of
the official boundaries and zoning maps as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-21-1 in accordance
with the provisions of the annexation and zoning ordinance.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS
The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may
request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the
City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at
issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition
for Judicial Review may be filed.
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian,
pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDMSION
(AZ-04-002)
PAGE 14 OF 16
property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty-eight (28) days after
the date of this decision and order, seek ajudicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho
Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
J.1-t~ day of
,~/¿
,2004.
ROLLCALL
COUNCILMAN SHAUN WARDLE
VOTED~
COUNCILMAN BILL NARY
VOTED $C<..-
COUNCILMAN CHARLIE ROUNTREE
VOTED $A-
COUNCILMAN KEITH BIRD
VOTED~
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD (TIE BREAKER)
DATED: f~Z7-tJ4--
VOTED --===
MOTION:
APPROVED:-Ä- DISAPPROVED:-
Attest:
SEAL"
William G. Berg, Jr., City Ie ~ Yc", .s!,'? f
.., 1".. ~ ,D)- ,
~ <:?, 7' 15\. .p .!
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIÓ~ (§b.~. 'f>\""""
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING/~EL)1::~1ìÌo;J
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDIVISION
(AZ-O4-002)
PAGE 15 OF 16
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and
the City Attorney.
ByJldL~r¡.
City Clerk
Dated:
Z:\WorklMlMeridianlMeridian 15360MlRœeleafSub AZ-O4-O02 PP-O4-0011AZF1C1&Order.doc
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICA nON
FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ROSELEAF SUBDMSION
(AZ-O4-002)
PAGE 16 OF 16