Loading...
2019-02-05 C I T Y C OUNCI L R EGU L A R M EET I NG AGENDA C ity Council Chamber s 33 E ast B roadway Avenue M er idian, I daho Tuesday, F ebruar y 5, 2019 at 6:00 P M 1. Roll-C all Attendance X A nne L ittle R oberts X J oe Borton X Ty P almer X Treg B ernt X Genesis Milam X L uke Cavener X Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. P ledge of Allegiance 3. Community Invocation by T roy D r ake of C alvar y C hapel M er idian 4. Adoption of Agenda Adopted as noted 5. F uture M eeting Topics - Public F orum (Up to 30 M inutes M aximum) Signing up prior to the start of the meeting is required. This time is reserved for the public to address thei r elected officials regarding matters of general interest or concern of public matters and is not specific to an active land use/development application. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented under this public comment section, other than the City Council may request that the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for a more detailed discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to further assi st you i n resolving the matter following the meeting. 6. Consent Agenda [Action Item] Approved A. Approve M inutes of J anuary 15, 2019 C ity C ouncil S pecial M eeting B. Approve M inutes of J anuary 15, 2019 C ity C ouncil Regular M eeting C. Approve M inutes of J anuary 22, 2019 C ity C ouncil Regular M eeting D. O berg S ubdivision S anitary S ewer & Water M ain E asement E. S helbur ne S ubdivision No. 2 S anitar y S ewer E asement F. S ilver stone Apar tmen ts S anitar y S ewer and Water M ain E asement 1 G. S ilver stone Apar tmen ts S anitar y S ewer and Water M ain E asement 2 H. S ilver stone Apar tmen ts Water M ain E asement I. F inal Order for C aven Ridge E states E ast No. 3 (H-2018-0132) by J UB E ngineer s, L ocated between S . M eridian Rd. and S . S tanding T imber Way and S outh of E . Victory Rd. J. F inal Order for L ittle C r eek No. 1 (H-2018-0136) by L ittle C r eek P artners, LLC , L ocated on the E ast side of N. L ocust G rove Rd. on the S outh side of E. Wilson L n. K. F inal Order for P ar amount Dir ector S ubdivision No. 2 (H-2018-0137 by B r ighton D evelopment Inc. L ocated on the S W corner of E. Chinden B lvd. and N. M eridian Rd. L. F inal Order for Verado S ubdivision No. 3 (H-2018-0138) by D evC o D evelopment, LLC, L ocated on the S E cor ner of the intersection of N. L ocust Grove Rd. and E. Ustick Rd. M. F inal Order for Vicenza C ommons Subdivision No. 2 (H-2018-0131) by C ottonwood D evelopment, LLC, L ocated E ast of N. B lack C at Rd. and W. G ondola D r. N. F inal Order for Vicenza E states No. 4 (H-2018-0133) by C ottonwood D evelopment, LLC, L ocated E ast of N. Black C at Rd. and S outh of 1. G ondola D r. O. F inal Order for Vicenza Valley No. 2 (H-2018-0140) by C ottonwood D evelopment, LLC, L ocated E ast of N. Black C at Rd. and Nor th of 1. G ondola D r. P. F indings of F act, C onclusions of L aw for L inder Village (H-2017- 0088) by Lynx/D M G Real E states P artners, LLC , L ocated at the S E Corner of N. L inder Rd. and W. C hinden B lvd. Q. F indings of F act, Conclusions of L aw for E ntr ata F ar ms (H-2018- 0125) by F I G Village at P arkside, LLC , L ocated 3880 and 3882 W. F ranklin Rd. R. Irrigation C rossing L icense Agr eement with S ettlers Irrigation Distr ict at the C oleman L ater al for the AC HD L inder Rd. – Ustick to M cM illan Utility Impr ovements S. P Y 18 C ommunity D evelopment B lock G rant (CDB G ) S ubrecipient Agr eement with M er idian D evelopment C orpor ation (M D C ) for a Not-to-E xceed amount of $180,000. T. Approval of C ontr act to T r ack Utilities, LLC for the “WRRF P RI M ARY P O WE R I M P RO VEM E NT S - C O NS T RUC T I O N” project for a Not-To-E xceed amount of $267,410.50. U. Approval of C ontr act Amendment No. 2.a to extend the contract for “L andscape M aintenance S er vices” to L awn C o. for the Not-to- E xceed amount of $180,952.20. V. Resolution No. 19-2126: A Resolution Appointing D ave Neal to S eat 3 of the Solid Waste Advisor y Commission. W. Resolution 19-2127: A Resolution D eclar ing T he Intent Of T he C ity O f M eridian To C onvey To T he Ada C ounty Highway D istrict For Right O f Way Purposes A P or tion O f C er tain Real P r operty L ocated Near T he Northerly P edestrian E ntrance To Heroes P ark O n Ten M ile Road, In S ection 26, T 4n, R1w, B m (A Portion Of Ada County Assessor ’s P arcel S 0426233770) In T he C ity O f M eridian, Ada C ounty, I daho; Instr ucting T he C ity Clerk To E stablish And Notice A Hear ing To Review T he P roposed C onveyance; And P roviding An E ffective D ate. X. City of M er idian F inancial Report - D ecember 2018 Y. AP I nvoices for P ayment 1/30/19- $521,385.57 Z. AP I nvoices for P ayment 1/31/19- $151,213.36 AA. AP Invoices for P ayment 1/31/19- $152.50 AB . AP Invoices for P ayment 2/6/19- $751,388.38 7. Items M oved F rom T he C onsent Agenda [Action Item] 8. Community I tems/Presentations A. M ayor's Youth Advisory C ouncil Update 9. Action I tems Land Use Public Hearing Process: After the Public Hearing is opened the staff report will be presented by the assigned City planner. Following Staff's report the applicant has up to 15 minutes to present their application. Each member of the public may provide testimony up to 3 minutes or if they are representing a larger group, such as a Homeowners Association, they are allowed 10 minutes. The applicant is then allowed 10 additional minutes to respond to the public's comments. No additional public testimony is taken once the public hearing is closed. The City Counci l may move to continue the item for additional information or vote to approve or deny the i tem with or without changes as presented. The Mayor is not a member of the Ci ty Council and pursuant to Idaho Code does not vote on public hearing i tems, unless to break a tie vote. A. Request for Reconsideration for T imber C r eek (H-2018-0042) by Neighbor s of T imber C reek Recycling's Illegal Heavy Industrial Use (J oshua L eonar d) Granted for the sole purpose of reviewing the Findings B. Request for Reconsideration for T imber C r eek (H-2018-0042) by M ark P er ison Granted for the sole purpose of reviewing the Findings C. P ublic Hearing for Proposed Vehicle Sharing Progr am Ordinance and Associated Proposed F ees 1. First Reading of O rdinance No. 19-1809: A n O rdinance A dding A New C hapter, C hapter 6, To Title 3, Meridian City C ode, Regarding Vehicle S haring P rograms; A mending Meridian City Code Section 4-2-2, R egarding P arty Responsible F or Nuisance; Adding A New S ection, Meridian C ity C ode S ection 7-1-9, To Title 7, C hapter 1, Meridian C ity C ode, R egarding Electric P ower-A ssisted Bicycles A nd S cooters; A dding A New Subsection, S ubsection 7-1-9(F ), To Meridian C ity C ode S ec tion 7-1-9, R egarding Prohibited Parking; Adopting A Savings Clause; And Providing An Effective Date. D. P ublic Hearing C ontinued fr om J anuary 2, 2019 for Warrick S ubdivision (H-2018-0115) by S chultz D evelopment, L ocated at 2445 E. Amity Rd. Approved 1. R equest: A nnexation and Z oning of 36.22 acres of land with an R -4 (19.94 ac res) and R -8 (16.28 acres) zoning districts; and 2. R equest: a P reliminary P lat consisting of 125 building lots and 19 common lots on 36.22 acres of land E. P ublic Hearing C ontinued fr om J anuary 22, 2019 for Alicia Court S ubdivision (H-2018-0107) by Riley Planning S ervices, L ocated 4036 E . G r anger Ave. Approved 1. R equest: P reliminary P lat consisting of 6 building lots and 2 common lots on 3.084 acres of land in an R -4 zoning district F. P ublic Hearing for B ainbridge F r anklin (H-2018-0057) by S teve B ainbr idge, L ocated at 2075 and 2155 W. F r anklin Rd. Approved 1. R equest: A nnexation and Z oning of 3.68 acres of land with a C - G zoning district G. P ublic Hearing for C ope Collision (H-2019-0002) by M ussell C onstruction, Inc., L ocated 1724 E. F r anklin Rd. Approved 1. R equest: Modification to an E xisting D evelopment Agreement (D A I nst. No. 2018-027680) f or the purpose of revising the building elevations from those approved in the original agreement 10. D epar tment Reports A. F ir e D epar tment: P T S D /P T S I L egislation Update and Request for S upport [Action Item] Vacated from the agenda 11. O rdinances A. O rdinance No. 18-1774B : An Amended O rdinance (H-2018-0006 F ast E ddy’s) F or Annexation O f A P arcel O f L and B eing A P or tion O f L ot 2, B lock 1 O f J asmine Acres S ubdivision (B ook 59 Of P lats At P ages 5,829 T hr ough 5,830, Records O f Ada C ounty, Idaho) And A P or tion O f Unplatted L ands, S ituated In T he Nor theast ¼ Of T he S outheast ¼ O f S ection 32 And T he Nor thwest ¼ O f T he S outhwest ¼ O f S ection 33, Township 4 North, Range 1 E ast, B oise M eridian, Ada County, Idaho, As D escribed In Attachment “A” And Annexing C er tain L ands And Territory, S ituated In Ada County, Idaho, And Adjacent And Contiguous To T he C orporate L imits O f T he C ity O f M eridian As Requested B y T he City Of M eridian; E stablishing And D eter mining T he L and Use Zoning Classification O f 1.50 Acr es O f L and F rom Rut To C -G (G ener al Retail And S ervice C ommer cial) Zoning D istrict In T he M eridian City C ode; Providing T hat C opies O f T his O rdinance S hall B e F iled With T he Ada C ounty Assessor, T he Ada County Recor der, And T he Idaho S tate Tax C ommission, As Requir ed B y L aw; And P roviding F or A S ummary O f T he O r dinance; And P roviding F or A Waiver O f T he Read ing Rules; And P roviding An E ffective D ate. Approved 12. F uture M eeting Topics 13. E xecutive S ession per Idaho S tate C ode 74-206(1)(a): To consider hiring a public officer, employee, staff member or individual agent, wher ein the respective qualities of individuals ar e to be evaluated in order to fill a par ticular vacancy or need Into Executive Session at 8:20pm Out of Executive Session at 8:34pm Adjourned at 8:34pm All mater ials presented at public meetings shall bec ome pr oper ty of the C ity of Meridian. Any one desir ing accommodation for disabilities related to doc uments and/or hearing, please c ontac t the C ity Clerk's Offic e at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Meridian City Council February 5, 2019. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:02 p.m., Tuesday, February 5, 2019, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Tammy De Weerd, Joe Borton, Luke Cavener, Ty Palmer, Genesis Milam, Anne Little Roberts and Treg Bernt. Also present: C.Jay Coles, Bill Nary, Bill Parsons, Stephanie Leonard, Clint Dolsby, Jamie Leslie, Joe Bongiorno and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: Roll call. X__ Anne Little Roberts X _ _Joe Borton X__ Ty Palmer X__ Treg Bernt __X___Genesis Milam __X___Lucas Cavener __X_ Mayor Tammy de Weerd De Weerd: Okay. I would -- I would like to welcome you all to our City Council meeting. Thank you for joining us. For the record it is Tuesday, February 5th. It's 6:00 p.m. I would like to -- I would like to start this meeting with a moment of silence. If you will join me in respecting the passing of our former city councilman and Council President Keith Bird. Just with your respect of a moment of silence. Thank you. Okay. Mr. Clerk. For the record it is Tuesday, February 5th -- I think I might have said that. It's after 6:00 and we will start with roll call attendance. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance De Weerd: Item No. 2 is our Pledge of Allegiance. If you will all rise and join us in the pledge to our flag. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Community Invocation by Troy Drake of Calvary Chapel Meridian De Weerd: Item 3 is our community invocation. If you will all join us in the community invocation or take this as an opportunity for a moment of reflection. Pastor Drake, thank you for joining us. Drake: It's a pleasure. Thanks, Mayor. Let's pray. Lord, I just first want to acknowledge you as the maker of heaven and earth and we just appreciate so much the life that you have given us and, you know, just remembering Mr. Bird and that you brought him here to help with the city and all the things he did and we just appreciate him, God, and we have gratitude for our own life and -- and the free life that we do have, God. We also so just acknowledge that you're the provider of comfort for us in times of loss and -- and Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 8 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 2 of 53 needs. I'm thinking of, Lord, the needs in our city, like someone who might need a job that they would find work and maybe a child in foster care , Lord, that's just wishing for a family, God, to adopt them. We just pray for those kids and, God, someone who is -- it doesn't feel safe tonight, Lord, that they could just find a place of refuge -- refuge and, God, also we are grateful for this free society that we -- we live in and -- and with that comes a measure of evil and we just pray that you would protect us from evil and that the -- the men and women who protect our city would have the necessary resources and help to do that. We appreciate them, God. And, Lord, here tonight we are praying for the wisdom for our city leaders. Actually, everybody who works in this building, just pray that you would give them lots of wisdom and especially here, again, tonight for the Council and -- the City Council and our Mayor, Lord, I pray that you give them lots of guidance as they leave this meeting and make decisions, the big ones and small ones that are all important to you and so, Lord, would you just help with all these business matters and thank you, God, for listening to me and we just pray for your hand of protection upon the City of Meridian, in Jesus' name, amen. God bless you guys. Item 4: Adoption of Agenda De Weerd: Thank you. Pastor Drake, you remind me of my dad. His prayers were like just talks with God. So, thank you. Okay. Item 4 is adoption of the agenda. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Item 10-A is going to come off the agenda and be moved to a different date. That's the only -- only change we have today. So, I would move that we adopt the agenda with that amendment. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as amended. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 5: Future Meeting Topics - Public Forum (Up to 30 Minutes Maximum) De Weerd: Mr. Clerk, any sign-ups under five? Coles: No, Madam Mayor. Item 6: Consent Agenda [Action Item] A. Approve Minutes of January 15, 2019 City Council Special Meeting Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 9 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 3 of 53 B. Approve Minutes of January 15, 2019 City Council Regular Meeting C. Approve Minutes of January 22, 2019 City Council Regular Meeting D. Oberg Subdivision Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Easement E. Shelburne Subdivision No. 2 Sanitary Sewer Easement F. Silverstone Apartm G. Silverstone Apartments Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 2 H. Silverstone Apartments Water Main Easement I. Final Order for Caven Ridge Estates East No. 3 (H-2018-0132) by JUB Engineers, Located between S . Meridian Rd. and S . Standing Timber Way and South of E . Victory Rd. J. Final Order for Little Creek No. 1 (H-2018-0136) by Little Creek Partners, LLC , Located on the East side of N. Locust Grove Rd. on the South side of E. Wilson Ln. K. Final Order for Paramount Director Subdivision No. 2 (H-2018- 0137 by Brighton Development Inc. Located on the SW corner of E. Chinden Blvd. and N. Meridian Rd. L. Final Order for Verado Subdivision No. 3 (H-2018-0138) by DevCo Development, LLC, Located on the SE corner of the intersection of N. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Ustick Rd. M. Final Order for Vicenza Commons Subdivision No. 2 (H-2018- 0131) by Cottonwood Development, LLC, Located East of N. Black Cat Rd. and W. Gondola Dr. N. Final Order for Vicenza Estates No. 4 (H-2018-0133) by Cottonwood Development, LLC, Located East of N. Black Cat Rd. and South of 1. Gondola Dr. O. Final Order for Vicenza Valley No. 2 (H-2018-0140) by Cottonwood Development, LLC, Located East of N. Black Cat Rd. and North of 1. Gondola Dr. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 10 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 4 of 53 P. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Linder Village (H-2017- 0088) by Lynx/DMG Real Estates Partners, LLC , Located at the SE Corner of N. Linder Rd. and W. Chinden Blvd. Q. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Entrata Farms (H-2018- 0125) by FIG Village at Parkside, LLC , Located 3880 and 3882 W. Franklin Rd. R. Irrigation Crossing License Agreement with Settlers Irrigation District at the Coleman Lateral for the ACHD Linder Rd. – Ustick to McMillan Utility Improvements S. PY18 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG ) Subrecipient Agreement with Meridian Development Corporation (MDC ) for a Not-to-Exceed amount of $180,000. T. Approval of Contract to Track Utilities, LLC for the “WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS - CONSTRUCTION” project for a Not-To -Exceed amount of $267,410.50. U. Approval of Contract Amendment No. 2.a to extend the contract for Landscape Maintenance Services” to Lawn Co. for the Not- to Exceed amount of $180,952.20. V. Resolution No. 19-2126: A Resolution Appointing Dave Neal to Seat 3 of the Solid Waste Advisory Commission. W. Resolution 19-2127: A Resolution Declaring The Intent Of The City Of Meridian To Convey To The Ada County Highway District For Right Of Way Purposes A Portion Of Certain Real Property Located Near The Northerly Pedestrian Entrance To Heroes Park On Ten Mile Road, In Section 26, T4n, R1w, Bm (A Portion Of Ada County Assessor ’s Parcel S0426233770) In The City Of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; Instructing The City Clerk To Establish And Notice A Hearing To Review The Proposed Conveyance; And Providing An Effective Date. X. City of Meridian Financial Report - December 2018 Y. AP Invoices for Payment 1/30/19- $521,385.57 Z. AP Invoices for Payment 1/31/19- $151,213.36 AA. AP Invoices for Payment 1/31/19- $152.50 AB . AP Invoices for Payment 2/6/19- $751,388.38 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 11 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 5 of 53 De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Item 6 is our Consent Agenda. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda as published, for the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. If there is no discussion, Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Bernt, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 7: Items Moved From The Consent Agenda [Action Item Item 8: Community Items/Presentations A. Mayor's Youth Advisory Council Update De Weerd: Our next item is under the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council update. Oh, and I didn't see you. So, I will turn this over to Ben. Hutchins: Thank you, Madam Mayor. So, I'm Ben Hutchins with the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council. I'm the vice-chair this year. So, our update for the past month -- first we had our legislative breakfast. This year we are propo sing that we lower the voting age to 17 for primaries if the individual will be 18 by the general election. This event was a great success and we decided, based off of our deliberation with all of the people that we had invited, that next year we are going to be bringing this to the house and senate if we have it perfected over this year. We are going to take this year to deeper consideration and make sure that we have it as good as we possibly can. We are going to take it to the Republican party and see what they are going to do to pass it -- what they would do to make it look better and we are going to take it to the Democratic party as well. Next we had Youth Lobby Day. We had over 25 high school participants and we partnered with the American Heart Association and we partnered with Safe Routes to School. This was another awesome event where we got to go speak to senators and legislators and get really in the feel of what it's like to be in the Capitol Building as a lobbyist, which was always a unique experience for teenagers, talking to people that we normally wouldn't be able to talk to and have conversations that normally people our age wouldn't be able to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 12 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 6 of 53 have conversations about. We lobbied for safe routes to school to get funding continued throughout the next years, because their bill was sunsetting and we wanted -- and all of us decided that this was something that affected us and we thought it would reflect well. We are having with our community service subcommittee a volunteer fair. We are volunteering with the -- or we are partnering with the Meridian Library and we are going to have a MYAC fair where we are going to see what a volunteer fair is like and see what we can do in the future and really get our feet in the water and see what it's like. Next we have plans for Valentine's Day coming up where the school ambassadors recently made over 360 Valentine's Day cards to pass out throughout their schools for anybody who may -- may not get a Valentine's Day card on Valentine's Day to make everybody feel welcome and happy and, then, we are having a Valentine's Day party on February 14th. Thank you. De Weerd: And stand for questions; right? Hutchins: Yes, ma'am. De Weerd: Council, any questions? Or comments? You guys are rocking it. Hutchins: Great. Thank you, Madam Mayor. Thank you, Council. Item 9: Action Items A. Request for Reconsideration for Timber Creek (H-2018-0042) by Neighbors of Timber Creek Recycling's Illegal Heavy Industrial Use (Joshua Leonard) B. Request for Reconsideration for Timber Creek (H-2018-0042) by Mark Perison De Weerd: Thank you, Ben. Okay. Item 9-A is under Action Items and this is a request for reconsideration for Timbercreek, H-2018-0042 and Item B is also a request for reconsideration, but I will turn these two items for comments first from our city attorney. Nary: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. You have two items before you tonight, a request for reconsideration on the Timber Creek project, H-2018-0042. Both of them have raised various issues with your approval of that project . At this point for reconsideration the Council's decision point is either to affirm the decision that's been previously made -- that has to be done by motion and a vote. Modify the findings so you would have to motion to either remand it for the limited purpose of modifying the findings and bringing it back to a later date for that final document or reversing the findings that have been done by motion, a vote to reverse the finding -- or the original findings -- or direction, as well as resetting it for public hearing at a future date. So, those are the three decision points for you to make tonight. We have reviewed the record, we have reviewed the request for reconsiderations, we have provided you with our legal opinion on moving Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 13 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 7 of 53 forward from this point. I can go into that if you wish or if you can take it from there, whichever you prefer. De Weerd: Council, what would your preference be? Would you like him to -- to detail that out? You have all received the memo. I think if there are any questions, then, we will direct it to you. Nary: Thanks. De Weerd: Thank you, Mr. Nary. So, Council, in front of you you have two different requests for reconsideration. So, we will open this up for discussion and/or questions. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: This was -- this was a project and an application that -- that I had voted against and wasn't supportive of back in September and stated the reasons why back then, but the purpose of what I understand the reconsideration today is is a little more narrow. I didn't see any specific deficiency in the process utilized, not necessarily certain a deficiency -- any legal deficiency in the substance of the decision made either. However, it may be helpful if a remand were to occur, to do so to more clearly state the findings of fact and conclusions of law from the existing record and I would be supportive of a remand for that purpose, to try to -- to more clearly articulate within the record those findings and conclusions perhaps better than it had been done before. Probably benefits everybody to do that and make that more clear. If that's the way this could be addressed. I don't know, Mr. Nary. De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Thank you. Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Borton, yes, this is a very lengthy record in this case, as you all know. We had a number of hearings for a number of hours. So, the record is very large and we would recommend that we -- we make clearer the findings that you have. Not the decision, but just as the findings, because from those findings stems the development agreement. We had a number of discussions about the development agreement and in reviewing the record those discussions took place over a number of hearings and you discuss ed them in parts and so -- and there were changes to the original development agreement that was proposed that you discussed in September and, then, again, I believe in November and so what we would recommend is what Council Member Borton is suggesting and doing that and, then, that way the development agreement that flows from those findings is clearer and more concise and in one document, because, again, as we discussed -- that we discussed pieces, we changed some of the original to -- there was some new numbering that was done and some of those things and that detail is in the record, but it's in two different parts. So, we would suggest that would make a cleaner record for appeal if that's where we end up. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 14 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 8 of 53 De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions or comments? Okay. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Question for legal counsel. Is -- we have got two separate requests for reconsideration. Are we addressing them each individually or -- De Weerd: Yes. Borton: We are handling No. A right now? Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Borton, we opened them both for your discussion, but I would -- I would recommend you make motions on each one separately. Borton: Okay. Madam Mayor, another follow up. If I heard you correctly is -- would it be remanding for setting forth of the findings of fact, conclusions of law in a more clear, inclusive, succinct manner than they were previously done? Nary: Yes. And with -- and with -- with a modified development agreement that goes along with it, yes. Borton: Okay. It wouldn't be an amendment of any substantive finding. Nary: No. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: With that explanation, as to Item 9-A, H-2018-0042, I would move that we grant the request for reconsideration for the limited purpose of remanding for new findings of fact, conclusions of law consistent with what legal counsel has provided. I believe the DA would be part of that as well. And that to come back before Council for its review and approval. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion. Do I have a second? Little Roberts: Second. De Weerd: Do I have any discussion? Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Bernt, yea. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 15 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 9 of 53 De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Item 9-B. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: From the review of 9-B, this is Mr. Perison's letter. It seems to mirror some of the -- the substantive issues raised in the 9-A request for reconsideration. Some of the same concerns. I echo what I said in the previous application. Same applies here as far as where my position was on the original application . Nonetheless, it could benefit us and all parties to go the same route with this one. So, I will make a motion and we can discuss after if there is discussion, but I would move that we grant the request for reconsideration on Item 9-B as well with the same directive, for it to be remanded for findings of fact, conclusions of law consistent with existing record in a more complete, succinct manner, inclusive of the DA that legal counsel has referenced just moments ago. Little Roberts: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Okay. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Bernt, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. C. Public Hearing for Proposed Vehicle Sharing Program Ordinance and Associated Proposed Fees 1. First Reading of Ordinance No. 19-1809: An Ordinance Adding a New Chapter, Chapter 6, To Title 3, Meridian City Code, Regarding Vehicle Sharing Programs; Amending Meridian City Code Section 4-2-2, Regarding Party Responsible For Nuisance; Adding A New Section, Meridian City Code Section 7-1-9, To Title 7, Chapter 1, Meridian City Code, Regarding Electric Power-Assisted Bicycles And Scooters; Adding A New Subsection, Subsection 7-1-9(F ), To Meridian City Code Section 7-1-9, Regarding Prohibited Parking; Adopting A Savings Clause; And Providing An Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 16 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 10 of 53 Effective Date. De Weerd: Okay. Item 9-C is a public hearing for the first reading of Ordinance 19-1809. Mr. Clerk, will you read this ordinance by title. Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 19-1809: An Ordinance adding a new chapter, Chapter 6, to Title 3, Meridian City Code, regarding vehicle sharing programs; amending Meridian City Code Section 4-2-2, regarding party responsible for nuisance; adding a new section, Meridian City Code Section 7-1-9, to Title 7, Chapter 1, Meridian City Code, regarding electric power-assisted bicycles and scooters; adding a new subsection, Subsection 7-1-9(F), to Meridian City Code Section 7-1-9, regarding prohibited parking; adopting a savings clause; and providing an effective date. De Weerd: Okay. You have -- I have opened this public hearing and heard the first reading. Mr. Clerk, do we have any signed up to provide comments? Coles: Madam Mayor, it looks like we have one. Randy Rutland. De Weerd: Yes. Come on down. Sorry, you're not a contestant on The Price is Right, but it just -- Rutland: That's too bad. Thank you. De Weerd: If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Rutland: My name is Randy Rutland. Address is 12063 West Rock Hampton Street in Boise, Idaho. De Weerd: Thank you. Rutland: My reason for coming this evening was to get a little bit more information on Meridian's take on the ride sharing program with the scooters and which companies plan to come to Meridian, if it's the same as what the city of Boise does, because I do have comments on both companies that are currently with Boise. So, that's my question is just will it be the Lime company, as well as the Bird scooter company. De Weerd: Thank you. And, Mr. Nary, do we have a presentation on this? Nary: Madam Mayor, I mean I certainly can -- for the record purpose, for the folks in the audience who are watching, what you have in front of you tonight is a proposal to create a franchise program in the city that will be limited under this iteration to t wo franchisees. So, we don't have a franchisee -- as this gentleman questioned, we don't have any franchisees yet. So, this is to establish that program to be able to operate within the City of Meridian. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 17 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 11 of 53 Rutland: Okay. De Weerd: So, those details can be found as they are contained in the ordin ance. We will -- I suppose -- I think we will have three readings and so this is just the first reading, so it would introduce it to the public. You have an opportunity to review the ordinance and ask any questions that you have regarding the ordinance , but it -- it would be as -- as Mr. Nary indicated. We don't pick who the e-scooter companies would be. It would be on a fair, even basis. So, first two in are the first two that -- that offer the service in the City of Meridian. Is that correct, Mr. Nary? Nary: Yes, ma'am. Rutland: I see. All right. I think that answered my question. Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Sir, you mentioned you had some comments specific to the two companies that we had experience with? Rutland: I do. I -- I actually -- I'm considered an independent contractor with both of them and I have pros and cons for both companies. Obviously, the pros would be the -- the fact that it takes away some of the traffic, parking issues that the city may encounter. Pollution. An affordable, cheap ride to get, you know, maybe your first or last mile of your trip where ever you plan to go. Some of the cons are, though, that their customer service is very poor in my opinion. I have been working with them for the last few months, since -- since they have established in Boise in late November -- or, I'm sorry, late October and whether there is a decision to be made or it's already been made and whether or not you bring on these scooter companies, you know, hopefully, there is some talk about -- and I have read the stipulations that are required by them. However, there is zero talk about what it does for the community as an independent contractor and what they have to go through in order to succeed with their profits. So, basically, it's really a customer service thing. Their -- their technology is -- they claim to be a billion dollar company each one of them and yet their technology is -- is poor at best as far as their app and the way you use their system. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Additional question for you, Mr. Rutland. As an independent contractor can you share with us what type of direction you receive from the two companies that you contract with about where to place the scooters? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 18 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 12 of 53 Rutland: Yes. It's -- it's on their app, so -- it's on their -- when you use your phone it will tell you exactly where the scooter is to be deployed. Now, with both companies it's before 7:00 a.m. and there is many times where there is -- this morning, for an example, I went to deploy a couple of Bird scooters and it told me to scan a regular Bird. I didn't know what that meant. So, I asked them. Now, unfortunately, the only correspondence you can have with them is through e-mail. There is nobody you can talk to on the phone. So, you really have to wait for them to reply back to you and my question literally was: Would you like me to scan a woodpecker? A crow? What would you like me to scan? Certainly I was being funny, because it's kind of frustrating. I work downtown at the courthouse in Boise and I mean it's just frustrating when you're trying to do what they ask of you, but, yet, there is multiple, multiple glitches with their app. Cavener: Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Any other questions? Thank you for joining us. Rutland: All right. Thank you so much. De Weerd: This is a public hearing. Is there anyone who would like to provide comment on -- on this item? Okay. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: I would. So, only in like the last hour was the -- the point was brought up to me that there is more than two -- I didn't even know -- companies out there and that it's literally the first two that can submit fast enough and so when I read through the ordinance I wasn't really -- had that in mind, so I wasn't really looking for, you know, performance requirements, so I don't know if they are in there or not, but my concern with that would be if -- if there are multiple ones that are interested, if there is more than two, do we have built into the ordinance any kind of -- they have to have so many deployed by a certain date or anything like -- time frame? Because my concern would be that if -- if that doesn't happen somebody could just kind of buy up the franchise and wait until they are ready, whether it's six months or a year down the road or I'm going to -- if I owned one -- I don't know if you could get away with it, but I would imagine I would probably want to just set up another entity and take them both and, then, just not do the other one and, then, you would -- instantly would have exclusivity, so -- De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Excuse me, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Palmer. Yes, that's exactly correct. So, there are -- there are two it contemplated. The minimum is a hundred and the maximum is 350. So, once they can have the total amount and what the city contemplated under its ordinance currently is 700. There are means to up those, but, yeah, there is exactly the scenario you're talking about certainly could occur if they Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 19 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 13 of 53 file the application timely and pay the fees, it is based on first in time. So, you know, from a -- from a standpoint when we were exploring this since last year -- originally -- and I think what they experienced in the city of Boise and what we experienced here is at the time we had these discussions there were only two vendors that expressed any interest and that -- and Boise originally didn't cap the number of vendors, they just capped the minimum and the maximums and the maximum total and not the vendors themselves. But, again, they looked at it with it being probably two. Now, you're correct, we have had increase from other vendors that are interested and this could create that problem where it really is just the first in the door. That's the nature of the licensing. We talked before about franchising and going through a different route on the selection process. That would be different than what's before for you right now. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I think Council Member Palmer brings up I think a fair concern, but I do believe our ordinance gives the city some teeth that if a vendor isn't performing, that they could be removed and I would take somebody who had the license and is not deploying it in an appropriate or timely manner noncompliant and we could, essentially, remove their license and award it to the next in line. So, I think there is some -- there is a carrot and a stick to have our operators operate appropriately within Meridian. De Weerd: Did that answer your question, Mr. Palmer? Palmer: Madam Mayor, yeah. Oops. Sorry, Dean. I usually try to be perfect with that. But that -- yeah, if that satisfies that issue -- and I don't know if anyone would attempt this -- I know this -- but the fat gut, capitalist -- free market, unapologetic capitalist in me, thinking these things through -- the other thing that I would ponder on if I were in that position is could I buy both of them and, then, paint them a different color, but still be the same entity, using the same app, or if -- and, then, you would still have both of them. I don't know if anyone would go to that effort in Meridian to make that happen , but we are still early in this process and I would rather not regulate them, but, obviously, we are going to and so I want to make sure that we are giving and -- making sure that there is an opportunity to actually have competition. Nary: So, Madam Mayor, Members of Council, to answer your question, Council Member Palmer, so what's required in the application is notice -- notice to us when you are going to begin. So, it doesn't have a start date requirement. So, it doesn't require you begin within 30 days or 60 days or whatever. They simply have to tell us when they are going to start. So, again, if you would like us to change that we can change that. But that's currently the way it is, is they simply notify us when that start date is, so apologize that Council Member Cavener is out of the room, but -- so it wouldn't be a violation if they told us the start date was 90 days from now or 120 days from now and they didn't -- as long as they stayed within the time period they said. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 20 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 14 of 53 Milam: A year? Nary: Well, the current -- the -- sorry. The question was could it be a year. This license period expires December 31st of this year, so -- and, then, they are subject to renewal. Palmer: Madam Mayor? When we get to the renewal can whoever has the franchise just be the renewal or do they have to reapply at 8:00 a.m. on the day after their expiration? Nary: I'm looking at the -- Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Palmer, so the renewal section, basically, the -- I don't -- the way I read it -- and I wasn't on the committee and maybe Mr. Coles would know better, but it doesn't read that there is a preference to the current vendor. So, it says December 15th is when the renewal period begins and the renew it -- it says renewing franchisees may request authorization to deploy the number of shared vehicles authorized in the previous year, but that doesn't give them a preference of start. And I may be mistaken, maybe it's somewhere else and I'm just not seeing it, but in the renewal provision there is no -- there is no preference for existing vendors. Coles: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council -- De Weerd: Mr. Coles. Coles: -- Council Member Palmer, so I think that it's the other way around, I believe. The renewal does actually give preference to the current franchisees , because they can apply for renewal on December 15th, I believe. However, an initial franchise -- Nary: Oh, I see. Coles: -- cannot be applied for until January 2nd. So, an initial one is a franchisee that doesn't currently have the franchise agreement . They can apply January 2nd. The current franchisees can apply for renewal December 15 th. Nary: I see. Okay. Palmer: Madam Mayor? Nary: Okay. De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: Sorry to dive so deep into this, but I want to get it right. So, if -- if somebody were to get the first one, could they say I -- we plan on starting in 450 days and, then, go a year without deploying, just so that they have locked down the position and, then, do the renewal, because they were the first one in and, then, deploy later in the second year? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 21 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 15 of 53 Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of Council, no, I don't think we would accept an application that the start date exceeds the current period of the license. I don't think that we would allow that. Palmer: Works for me. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: It brings up a good point. That's the type of clarity that would be helpful for the applicant to know, whether it's part of -- you know, in addition to the initial application for a franchise that, you know, makes them aware of the fact that whatever they pick as their initial start date must be something -- no later than the end of the current term that you're applying for or 90 days from your application or something that gives them that understanding that should they want to invest in this program here there is a date by which they have to launch, so they can make a decision. De Weerd: So, this is just the first reading, so as -- as we continue to accept comments -- if you find these things and you want to change it, that -- that's the beauty of the three readings, that you have opportunity to -- to gain further information and -- and look at some of these technicalities or opportunities, depending on how you want to say it. Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor, since I recently learned, I think like everyone else did, that there are more that are interested than just the two we are familiar with, just maybe some food for thought and discussion at a later time, would we consider maybe doing an RFP or something, having them be a little more competitive than just if you're first in the door you're automatically in and, then, potentially struggling if they are not meeting our criteria? Maybe we need to just think about that. De Weerd: That is, indeed, another approach and -- and one that you could ask for letters of reference and how they -- their technology works or their experiences in -- in other communities or -- it would open up for additional discussion as to what those criteria would be. Mr. Nary, anything you want to add? Nary: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I mean I think -- certainly that's -- that's an option. Again, that's not what's in front of you and we can certainly suspend this if that's the direction you wish to go and move forward with an RFP process, because the benefit is -- as we have previously discussed, you can set the criteria that's most important to you on how this is done, how it's operated, hours of operation, where it's -- I mean can be used. How it needs to be used. Have selection criteria that's weighted for those things, so that you have a way to discern the difference between number one and number whatever and -- and, again, if you want a cap of numbers of individual scooters per franchisee, cap on the total amount in the city, whatever -- whatever your preference. I mean certainly those can be done in our fee. It's a little more difficult than the licensing Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 22 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 16 of 53 one, other than having the -- not having a cap on the number of franchisees and that's what the city of Boise chose to do. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: The UD, I guess, of the less regulation or this version is that you have competition that's created just purely by who wants to get in the market and who gets there first and my concern with an RFP version is, then, we get to where government is picking who is going to be there, who is going to be allowed to do that business in town, and if -- you know, if one sucks and the other one doesn't, the free market will take care of it and people will ride one and not the other. If they suck equally, then, either they will ride them or they won't, but ideally whoever wants in can get in if they are the first two and try to be better than the other, instead of having us just pick who is going to do the most favors for the city. Not that -- I don't think any of you guys, but I'm worried about future councils that I don't know and trust. De Weerd: Okay. Any -- anything further on this? We -- oh, yes. Chief. Lavey: Madam Mayor, Counsel, I just want to point out that using Councilman Palmer's analogy of a business sucking, you just need to realize that not using the ridership or the ridership is only one part of the suck -- is if it's a bad company it's going to create lots of manpower for us and so we want to make sure that we have reliable companies in there. I support the RFP process, but I also support the free market. If we are going to do the free market, then, we need to make sure that we have rules in place that allow us to revoke these people when they do suck, because my experience with a few of the companies have not been great. But I will tell you that there is currently four companies that I'm aware of. Three of those companies are looking -- well, two of those companies are in Boise. An additional is looking at Boise and there is a fourth one in the wings. So, there is four floating around there that could come to Meridian. So, just want to point out that not riding them is only one part of the equation . If they got bad business practices, then, they are going to create a lot of workload on our part. So, just making sure that whatever ordinance we come up with has a mechanism that we can revoke them if they are poor performers. So, we either judge them before or we judge them after, but if they are a bad company we don't want them doing business in the city. And since it was a long walk to get here, I'm not going to leave until I make sure there is no questions. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: Chief, since you walked all the way up here in pain, I just want to wonder -- I'm wondering if any of those companies are purple? Are any of them purple? Lavey: Any of them are purple? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 23 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 17 of 53 Milam: That's the most important thing. Lavey: Just because you have a purple sweater on right now, is that why, or is there some other reason? Milam: I just -- De Weerd: There is a color to a tot lot. Milam: My favorite color. Lavey: I do know that -- I do know the colors of two that I will not mention. I do not know the colors of the other two. Milam: I'm just kidding. Madam Mayor, I agree with -- with what the chief is saying and I -- I would -- I think maybe first come first serve isn't the best route to take on this. I think if there are four companies we should have a better system for looking at them and picking the two that are going to be the best -- or at least that we think are going to be the best companies and -- and what happens if you get three at the same time or all four -- or all at the time. So, I think that needs to be looked at real carefully. Coles: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: I think Mr. Clerk has been looking at that. Would you like to comment? Coles: Absolutely. And to the chief's point, just so the Council is aware, my office has been actually in communication five total companies. So, the limited communication -- five. I'm not aware of the colors however. Sorry, Council Member Milam. In terms of the first in, our Enterprise software that we use to track intake and issuance of licenses is what we will use to track when we receive applications, so it won't be at our front counter, it will actually be through our Enterprise software, which will date and time stamp and I'm told it has the ability to go down even to the millisecond in terms of time stamping. So , we know who the actual first -- first in is or the first two in. Then from that we will be looking at completeness of applications. So, if five total companies submit, it's the first two that have submitted -- that have a complete application without our office having to go back to say you have missed a step or you have missed three steps. So, we want to make sure that the application is complete and that we are lessening the manpower on our staff to walk people through the process, because that takes time to answer questions and walk through the process. So, that's what we have been looking at in terms of the first in in determining who those first two are. De Weerd: And you can't be early, because you aren't qualified. Mr. Nary, is there a hybrid model you could look at to -- to maybe find that middle ground between the two concerns -- one if they are qualified and they meet certain criteria and, then, two, that they would have a submission date and still allow the free market to choose them once they are qualified. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 24 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 18 of 53 Nary: So, Madam Mayor, we have had a committee working on this for quite a while and I know they have explored all of those options. So, under the licensing one -- I mean this is -- this is the standard model -- model for licensing any type of activity. So, I guess the concern I have -- and when we were talking about deficient business practices, those really aren't something we normally regulate in a license circumstance. So, here in the ordinance, if you look at it, really, the only basis for revocation is they are not operating as they told us they would, whatever -- whatever they tell us how they are going to operate, so where they locate them, how they located, when they put them out, take them back, all of that. They violate the law or they have lied on their application or they don't pay the fee. That's it. So, I -- I have a sense from everybody talking what you think of as bad business practice is more than those things and that's the problem. In the licensing circumstance it's very difficult to manage preference and so that's why the conversation was over an RFP where you could set out their criteria that you want it to be and pick your successful vendor based upon that. So, there are -- there are just two distinct ways of doing it, but the cap on the number creates that race to the -- to the clerk's office that maybe not -- may not be the best way to do it. But the only way to really change that is to, then, not have a cap on the number. You can -- what Boise did was they put no cap on the number, they put a requirement of a minimum and a maximum and maximum total in the city. And, like I said, at the time I think -- and Mr. Coles can confirm, but I think they are considering new caps because of more vendors, because they did the same thing, they just capped the total number in the city and that allowed more than one vendor to participate or it could have allowed two or three, but you had them -- each one picked up their full load up front and so it absorbed the entire cap by two vendors to start. That's why they are looking at more. Lavey: Boise -- Boise is capped at three companies currently. Nary: Three? Okay. But I think it's capped based on the numbers. Lavey: They have a -- they have a number which is 750, not to exceed that -- Nary: Right. Lavey: -- and, then, they have a cap of three vendors currently. Nary: Right. But -- I'm sorry to disagree with you, but I don't think it says there is only three allowed in the city. Lavey: Yes, it -- Nary: Oh, it does? Okay. Lavey: It says only three vendors currently, yes, in their ordinance. De Weerd: And I guess the committee really focused on -- if we are going to do this we want to do it right and the race to be the first to submit, I don't know if that necessarily will Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 25 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 19 of 53 give you the most qualified to -- to try and do this right, because I will tell you we had a lot of complaints after the first rollout and if the comments and the -- the phone calls that we have received are any indication, we don't really have a large percentage of our citizens that are supportive of this program to begin with. Kicking it off wrong I think would not be a good way to start a program -- to see how it would work, because I think as we heard earlier, there are advantages of being an alternate transportation form of low emission and an inexpensive way to -- to have alternative transportation. So, you would want to do it right. I don't know, it's -- it's certainly your decision. Lavey: Madam Mayor, Council, just to comment on that and I echo with what you said. I wasn't real supportive of this because of the experience we had the first time, but I have really tried to come around and give that benefit to the -- to the city and to the companies that we did have experience with. I will tell you that there is one company that is still very, very disappointing, even after I reached out to them and they said they heard me . Well, they have now forgotten me and we still have not met. So , I am really, really concerned if we go forward this way with first in -- first come first serve, because they haven't proven their reliability and -- and, frankly, with what Mr. Nary said about we are limited in how we can revoke, I'm concerned we are going to have a nightmare all over again. So, I think we need to slow down and we need to not rush this. But that's one person's opinion, so -- I realized the vote rests with you, just, please, proceed cautiously, because that trust has not been earned yet in some of those companies. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: A couple thoughts. Appreciate the comments from the chief. As one who has worked on RFPs in the past, everyone who works on an RFP works really really hard to make sure your organization looks as best as possible when you submit something and so I have been on the side where we have selected our piece for organizations and they haven't performed to the level that they had indicated and promised they would. I think that -- what I'm hearing from the chief, which I think maybe worth some further exploration -- is strengthening our case or our basis for revocation if a -- if a licensee isn't performing. I think that's more appropriate than entering into an RFP process. Again, I don't know if there are other provisions that the committee that worked on this discussed. Perhaps that's something that we could hear feedback from the committee before a final vote. I am not one that gets really excited about an RFP process for this, just because I think it's -- it's a formalized sales pitch from businesses and , you know, we -- as -- as I hear from the chief it sounds like we have got one operator in the valley right now that has been forthright and has met with the police department, one who is not -- and, then, it sounds like three that are kind of an unknown. So, I think the Mayor's correct, let's try and get this correct, but I think that we can achieve what maybe sounds like some additional Council Members want to see without necessarily having to invent an RFP process, go through a scoring and, again, scores are driven by a small group of people -- did they have breakfast that morning? Is the -- using favorite words? I mean there is just so many variables that I don't get really excited about an RFP process. So, if we can avoid it I'm Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 26 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 20 of 53 supportive of that, but let's -- let's take some of the feedback from the chief and feedback from you as Council, if there is additional teeth that you want to add to give the city greater strength to remove a licensee if they are not performing and I would support that. De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions for the chief? Lavey: I can limp back up here if you have them. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Cavener. Cavener: What run -- what run were you on? Lavey: What was that? Cavener: What run were you on? Lavey: It was Nugget. De Weerd: It's the bunny hill. Lavey: On the back side. Yes. Chair six. Before we got to 16 inches of powder. Cavener: Glad you're okay. De Weerd: Yeah. Cavener: Appreciate you being here. Lavey: Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you, chief. Okay. Anything further? Otherwise, we will put this on the next week's calendar. Okay. Okay. Very good. D. Public Hearing Continued from January 2, 2019 for Warrick Subdivision (H-2018-0115) by Schultz Development, Located at 2445 E. Amity Rd. 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 36.22 acres of land with an R -4 19.94 acres) and R -8 (16.28 acres) zoning districts; and 2. Request: a Preliminary Plat consisting of 125 building lots and 19 common lots on 36.22 acres of land Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 27 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 21 of 53 De Weerd: Okay. Item 9-D is a public hearing continued to -- from January 2nd for H-2018-0115. I will ask for staff comments at this time. Parsons: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. This particular item is the Warrick Subdivision. It was before you on January 2nd -- excuse me. Before I get into that I will give you -- get you familiar with where the property is located. So, the application is here, again, discussing annexation and preliminary plat of the particular project. The site consist of 36.22 acres of land, currently zoned RUT in Ada county and located on the south side of Amity Road, midway between Locust Grove to the west and Eagle Road to the east. The applicant is asking for split zoning on this particular property. If you remember at the January 2nd hearing we had a portion of -- half of it -- approximately half of it was going to be zoned R-8 and the southern portion was going to be zoned R-4. During that hearing the Council had some concerns with the applicant's request for a step up and asked the applicant to revise the plat to lose approximately, I don't know, 20 lots or so -- or 18 lots if I remember correctly, and lower their destiny from roughly 3.6 dwelling units to 3.09 dwelling units to the acre. So, the exhibit on the left-hand side is the original plat that was before you on the 2nd. The revised one is the larger one on the right-hand. As you can see here staff has annotated the plat to let you know where they -- they haven't lost all of the lots that were discussed at that particular hearing, but what they did do is add the tot lot based on some of the discussion that was heard at the hearing. They did remove the request for attached product, so all of the units within this proposed development are now all of the single family detached homes and you can see here they roughly last -- compromise with the total decrease in lots -- to the number of five. So, again, staff feels this still is -- takes the discretion from you to allow the minimal step up from three units to the acre to 3.45 dwelling units to the acre. Staff has received additional written testimony on this application since it was heard on the 2nd. There was four neighbors had -- supported the Council's recommendation to reduce the lots and not allow the reduction in the step up in density and, then, we also received testimony in which one of the residents did not agree with the -- the noticing requirements of the code, felt like we violated that, we should have required a greater notice, rather -- rather than 300 foot radius we should have had a greater notice radius notification. But our code only requires that we notice annexation with a 300 foot radius. So, we are in good sta nding as far as our ordinance goes. And, then, Steve and Kathy Stark. Again, if you recall at the last hearing on the 2nd there was a lot of discussion around the floodplain and how that would impact their property on the other side of Amity Road and so they want to make sure that his body remembers that discussion and that they incorporate the appropriate conditions in this project if you were to approve this particular project this evening. They want to make sure that both culverts are upgraded per the required sizing based on the study that will be required as part of the project. The applicant did commit to making those changes and adjustments, so I think we have them on record. But, again, they want to make sure that that's incorporated into the staff report. Again, staff is recommending approval of this particular project. It did come before you with a recommendation from our Planning and Zoning Commission. As I mentioned to you the lot count isn't exactly what you had requested of the applicant, so I will go ahead and conclude my presentation and stand for any additional questions you may have. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 28 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 22 of 53 Borton: Thank you, Bill. Council, any questions of staff? No? So, Council, this was -- before we get into Matt's comments here, this was heard on January 2nd. That was a Council meeting I was absent at, so part of preparations for today's hearing was going through the entire record from the initial application , review -- reviewed that, reviewed everything in the public record, the staff reports from P&Z, City Council, December 4th, December 24th. Public testimony that was submitted in writing. Bill Pro. Dave Palumo -- I'm going to say some of these wrong, but -- Elise Pessetto. Elise Poulson. Lisa Nomura. Steve and Kathy Stark and their live testimonial at the last hearing. Susan Karnes. Susanna Bohlman. William -- I can't read my own handwriting. William Prolsdofer? I apologize, William, if you're here, because I know that's probably not your last name. All of that to say as part of being able to participate in today's hearing, the entire record was reviewed and all of the minutes were read. So, I feel because of all that comfortable participating today in the discussion and ultimate decision, so -- Little Roberts: Mr. President? Borton: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. President, I as well was gone that day and thank you for stating all the names and everything. I did spend about three hours this morning reviewing everything and feel that I am prepared to participate in the conversation as well. Borton: Okay. Council and people, I guess, if you're watching or folks here, one of the reasons that it's -- we probably are going to do a better job stating that on the record. Council, when we miss we always do that, review everything, review minutes, prepare, catch up if we are ever going to participate in something that we missed, but we will all do a better job making sure that we say that on the record and tell you publicly, it's important for you to know that. We know the work that we do and we understand that that's necessary to make a decision, but sometimes I think we fail to share that with you, which is our fault. So, we are going to try and do a better job on those occasion s when we miss, to make sure you know. Make a record that we have done that and got caught up, so the decision making process and ultimate decision, at least you're comfortable that we are doing it with our eyes wide open and with a full understanding of the application. So, we will do better going forward. De Weerd: Go ahead. I don't know where you are. Borton: Madam Mayor, we -- Mrs. Little Roberts and I just finished describing for the record the review of all the materials and the minutes necessary to participate today. So, it's Mr. Schultz's turn to come forward. De Weerd: Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward. Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Schultz: Good evening. Matt Schultz. 8421 South Ten Mile in Meridian. Here on behalf of Berkeley Building Company and the Warrick family in the process of selling the property Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 29 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 23 of 53 to Berkeley Building Company and they have been on the -- they have lived on the property for many many years. Mr. Paul Warrick is 101 here in a week or two and he remembers dad building the house that he's still in right now October of '41. That's when he bought it. He remembers when Pearl Harbor hit they were building for -- building it and we have had an opportunity to meet with the Warricks a few times and enjoy his -- his vitality and sparkle in his eye and firm handshake and he actually -- he remembers his dad building the barn across the street on the Wells property that developed when he was five back in 1923. A lot of good stories about the neighborhood and -- so, what was Meridian like back then. Like it was small. He used to go to work in Boise. Meridian used to be kind of small. Whatever that meant. I don't know. That's what he said. It was really small, you know, way back then. Anyways, I digress. So, thanks for letting us come back. Last time on January 2nd. Appreciate the opportunity to reevaluate our application and that night when I went back to the -- to the office I thought, okay, how is this different from say portions of Hill Century Farm, Sky Mesa, Reflection Ridge and Tuscany and what jumped out at me was the attached product and the 40s. Our intent wasn't to lose a certain number of lots, we said let's just eliminate those and see what -- see what comes out of it. It wasn't a set number and it ended up being five that we lost and so with that we thought we have kind of molded and actually exceeded amenity wise and some other things in comparisons to other adjacent subdivisions in doing so. So, we felt comfortable coming back with this. I acknowledge we didn't go all the way down to all R-4. I did look at it that night, though, said what if we did go back to R-4, what would that -- what would that generate or -- you know, there is a 3.0, you know, number that we talked about, but there is also what about just all R-4, which is considered a low density and I put in my -- my cover letter here that it -- we would bet about 116 lots about, 3.2 to the acre. So, my experience of doing this over the last 20 plus years as an engineer and as a planner, laid out a lot of lots myself -- I mean this is my layout. Give it to the engineer, they -- they do what they got to do, but I really am familiar with the staff and what makes it so interesting to do this is every site is different. Every piece of property is a certain shape, every piece of property is a different size, has a different efficiency, if you will, as to how -- how it yields on a -- on a -- on density, this number that we use for gross density, which is the -- the area off the center line of the road, off the center line of a ditch, divided by the total number of units, we use that as a -- as a guide to how close we are to -- to the goals of that comprehensive plan. Everyone is different. It's amazing, you have the same number, the same size a lots, say R-4 to the south here is -- is 3.36 to the acre, pretty efficient, you know, just over the ten percent open space on its own. If we use that same size of lot across the street on Wells, which we did, it came out 2.7. It just was less efficient, it just -- it just was. It was the shape, it was the amount of ditches, the amount of road, it just -- that's the way it came out. So, I don't want to get too hung up on the exact number of lots. In our experience R-4 would lay out to about 2.6 and 3.4 or 3.5. That's just where it lays out and just -- everyone's different. Some are more efficient than others and we felt it was important to provide a mix, to provide some different size in exchange for that go with exceptional open space, exceptional amenities and all those things that we have done here as far as amenities. We have five -- I think two are required in terms of playground. The pool, the pathway or over 15 percent open space is considered an amenity and, then, we actually have a more -- more than just a pool house, it's like a little clubhouse. So, we have five. When it comes to the percentage of open space, like I said, Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 30 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 24 of 53 this is really a good, solid number. We feel proud to have -- really want this to be a premier subdivision in south Meridian, which is a premier area and destination place to live. Done a lot of projects over the years down here and I'm proud of it. So, the pool was something we wanted to do and I wanted to mention that in our experience -- at least from what I know about Tuscany and Reflection Ridge, they got a pool for about every 250 residents -- 250 lots. Tuscany has got a thousand lots. Four pools. Reflection -- Reflection Ridge has 250 lots, one pool. I don't know about the other guys. This has one for 125. So, it's doing better in that regard, too. Not everybody is going to use the pool. I think some people that buy here are going to like the idea of they could use the pool or their grandkids could use the pool if they wanted to. Now, whether they do or not, I don't know, but it's a good -- it's a good thing to have. Along with the playground. Same thing. Not everybody is going to use it, but some will. So, with that said, we think that what we brought back before is something that matches what's in the area as exceptional amenities, exceptional open space and speaking of the Starks, that was their one opposition. They, you know, have a flood zone issue that we are going to go out of our way to fix across the street. It's not our fault, but we are not going to make it worse, we are going to make it better in fact by -- by fixing two culverts instead of one. But one of the other issues at the neighborhood meeting and also at P&Z -- I'm not sure she mentioned it or they mentioned it at City Council was the attached product and so I made sure I mentioned that to her before I walked in here, hey, we got rid of the attached and she said thanks. So, anyways, we did that. So, just for the record, I don't know what you got for all the written testimony, but they were the only person who showed up that was a pseudo protestor and even that was more about the flood zone than anything else. As far as the -- if you do make a recommendation for approval we would like to request -- there is two parcels on this piece that we -- that we get an early building permit, potentially, before the plat records for the pool and the clubhouse. We want to get that going sooner than later and so that would be something that's at your discretion to allow, subject to all the other requirements that Planning and Zoning has, to pull building permits. So, with that we are excited about it. We are proud of it. One other issue about the schools, you know, that was a hot button for at least one person. These more efficient lots from our experience -- and like Council Woman Milam said, it could be a hundred kids or 700 kids. I remember that. You know, because it could. You just don't know; right? But in our experience the initial buyers of these more efficient lots are downsizers, empty nesters a couple without kids, or could have kids and it could change over time, but what we are seeing is like 60 to -- 60 to 70 percent are of that category and they all pay taxes, whether they have kids or not , to the schools and so we see that is our answer to the school issue. Not everybody here is going to have kids, but they will still pay taxes to the school district. So, with that I will stand for any questions and ask for your approval after. Thanks. De Weerd: Council, any questions? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 31 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 25 of 53 Borton: I just have one. On the -- the lot reduction request that was made, was the -- the decision to not eliminate the additional lots that were requested based on any physical features of the parcels themselves? Were you prevented from an engineering perspective from doing so or is it a more subjective either business purpose behind it? Schultz: Excuse me, Mayor, Councilman. I'm sorry as far as inability to take off more? Borton: Correct. Schultz: It's -- it's purely a business decision. Berkeley Building Company prides itself on doing a variety of products, all the way from say 300,000 up to si x, seven hundred thousand. And these more efficient lots give us a better cross-section of buyers to -- to attract and so it is a business decision -- Borton: Okay. Schultz: -- very much so, that we want this and it's not more lots are better -- obviously that plays into it somewhat, but it really truly is about having a variety of buyers that can get us -- it's not even really affordable anymore, but around 300 for these smaller ones, so -- De Weerd: Thank you. Schultz: Thanks. De Weerd: Mr. Clerk. Coles: Thank you, Madam Mayor. Susan Karnes is the only one that signed up wanting to testify this evening. De Weerd: Thank you. Karnes: Good evening. De Weerd: Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Karnes: Susan Karnes. 5556 South Graphite Way. De Weerd: Thank you, Susan. Baumgartner: Kathi Baumgartner. 2310 East Lake Hazel. De Weerd: Thank you. Karnes: We would like to open our remarks by expressing our deepest condolences to Councilman Keith Bird's family and to you, his esteemed colleagues and friends. We Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 32 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 26 of 53 would like the public record to reflect our community's deepest respect for Mr. Bird and his remarkable record of service to our city and his lasting and indelible legacy. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Karnes: We are here this evening representing the Southern Rim Coalition and to report to Council the consensus of the nearby neighborhoods regarding this application . As you have seen, the Warrick Subdivision offers desirable amenities and generous open space. We thank the applicant, who is a Meridian resident and also desire sustainable neighborhoods -- for designing a neighborhood that would be a highly desirable R-8 neighborhood. However, this land is zoned R-4. As you know, the Southern Rim Coalition is on the record for asking Council to adhere to the current future land use map and to suspend all new step-ups until Meridian stakeholders have crafted a new vision for our city through its new comprehensive plan. In your September 4th meeting you directed staff to, quote, highly discourage, unquote, Comprehensive Plan text or map amendments. All the areas of town has seen numerous step-ups in residential density, especially step-ups from low density to medium. More significantly, our schools are overcrowded and they are facing an even greater crisis of overcrowding. At this moment hundreds of homes -- at least 891 by our count -- are just now entering or soon will enter the pipeline for our schools. Hillsdale Elementary as of today was built with a capacity for 650 students. Today's enrollment is 788. Kathi has a list for you of the homes broken down, so you can see out of these 891, almost every single one is under construction or let -- yet to come online. Sky Mesa, 278 homes. The streets are just now nearing completion. None of those homes are built. This application elicited an especially vocal and negative response from our ne ighborhoods and those most affected by it, the Sky Mesa and White Bark residents and parents of school aged children. Many express their anger that the applicant reduced his original iteration by only five rooftops. We see no compelling reason to justify this higher density, which is, essentially, a zoning step up while we are actively creating a new Comprehensive Plan. Our area has numerous R-8 neighborhoods. Our schools are grossly over capacity and the nearby White Bark neighbors, who had very recently purchased their homes with the assurance their back fence neighbors would be comparable R-4 lot sizes, are few in number, only seven have moved into their new homes. The adjoining homes are under construction. These residents do not have a resident run HOA to support this play to Council that you adhere to the Comprehensive Plan and the city's legal right to restrict this land to R-4 density standards and dimensions. We deeply appreciate the quality of this R-8 application, but respectfully request that you deny Warrick Subdivision, unless it meets 3.1 or lower density. Stand for questions. De Weerd: Thank you, Susan. Council, any questions? Thank you both. Karnes: I would just like to take a moment to acknowledge to Council that Matt Schultz has been really very professional and outstanding in his communication with us in discussing his application and its amenities and benefits. So, just would like to express our respect to him. Thank you. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 33 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 27 of 53 De Weerd: Thank you for adding that. Thank you, Kathi. Coles: No other sign-ups. De Weerd: Okay. This is a public hearing. Is there anyone else -- sir. Good evening. Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Stark: My name is Steven Stark. I live at 2630 East Amity Road and -- De Weerd: Thank you. Stark: -- my letter to the City Council explained a concern I had about the floodplain on our property being increased from the established FEMA floodplain map as it stands today and I expressed this concern at the last city -- City Council meeting and the two points -- I would just like to verify is that Matt has just commented that he would make things better, but as I -- the older I get the more stickler I am about details, you know, so what I would like to make sure is that the two culverts would be replaced, the floodplain would be reduced on our property and that would be at no cost to us and I wanted to insure these commitments made by Schultz -- Matt Schultz at the -- and the Berkeley Building Company at the last meeting was incorporated in any approvals today. So, that's all I have. Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Stark. Is there anyone else who would like to provide testimony? Yes, ma'am. Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. K.Stark: Kathy Stark. 2630 East Amity Road, Meridian. De Weerd: Thank you. K.Stark: Matt -- I do appreciate him getting rid of the adjoined or -- I call them duplexes -- connected housing and the tot lot, but we still have R-8 and that's a step up in density and our schools are really overcrowded. I was just doing a little research and I found a program -- what was it? I will have to put my readers on. KIVI TV had a program saying -- called Making The Grade and they interviewed Eric Exline and he stated that in West Ada School District there has already been 14,000 houses -- sites approved and that he has -- and I can quote him here -- it says that's a big number. Like I said, that's 11,000'ish future kids that will show up when those houses are built and sold out. Eleven thousand. That's scary. Rocky -- he said Rocky is about 600 over and Mountain View is 500 over, but the other two major High Schools, Centennial and Eagle are also over. So, I thought is this true? I'm going to call him. So, I called him and he said it is true, but he also said that Mountain View is going to get 18 extra classrooms and I said how many students will that accommodate and he said 170, but they were about 500 over. So, that doesn't even take care of the overcrowding that we currently have and with -- like the other gal said, we have Century Farms, they are not totally built out, White Bark, the Wells Subdivision, Sky Mesa -- huge. I drove by there today and they are just putting their streets in and Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 34 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 28 of 53 there is lots of houses in there and, then, I heard -- now, I don't know if this is true. You guys would know better than me. That there is 1,800 homes that there is in the works of planning. Lake Hazel and Locust Grove'ish -- I think by the new park area. That's incredible. And I asked Mr. Excline -- I said so what's the next school slated for our area, because the elementary is overcrowded, the junior high's overcrowded -- or middle school is overcrowded, the high school is overcrowded and he said that it would probably be an elementary school, but it would be a while. So, I have a great concern for the kids and the overcrowding that they are already experiencing and that this is not going to be relieved by a step up in density and, you know, while I appreciate the extra amenities, I don't think it's a fair exchange for a step up in density. So, I would ask that you would hold to the comp plan and do R-4. And the other thing I just want to say is thank you guys for your time. I know it's a thankless job at times I'm sure, but we do appreciate your service to the city and we would like to see our city stay a great place to raise a family, to live and for our kids to be educated. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you, Kathy. Any further testimony? Yes. Thank you for joining us. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Atalla: Sure. Joe Atalla. 2275 South Eagle Road, Meridian. De Weerd: Thank you. Atalla: Thank you again for your consideration of this project. I am with Berkeley Building Company and I guess a few things. One, there has been a lot of discussion about the schools and the impact that this project would have on the schools and from the discussion that I have been hearing it sounds like we are somewhat being punished for other communities that have already been approved ahead of us. As -- you know, as I look at the redesign of the plat and, you know, please understand that the reduction of only five units versus what had discussed last time was not in any way meant as an offense, but to reiterate some of what Matt was saying, we really looked at the plat, some of the concerns at the time. Also what the comp plan goals are and whether our project met those goals and as far as the number of home sites and how that affects the schools, you know, again, as Matt said, the smaller lots -- our experience has been in other communities that we have built with the smaller lots in Meridian is typically, like you said, empty nesters, also, you know, families starting out with -- without school age children, young couples, singles and that type of home provides that opportunity for them. So, as we were looking at laying out the -- the plat, to answer your -- you know, to speak to your question about, you know, whether it was a business decision , Councilman Borton, I did not -- I couldn't in good conscience create a plat that only had homes that would ultimately be 500,000 dollars and up and when I looked at it I thought this would be a great location, in keeping with the other communities surrounding us and, you know, create a premier community with great amenities, great lifestyle opportunities for, you know, people who can't afford 500,000 dollar houses and I know there has been a lot of discussion about affordability in Meridian and, you know, what does that look like exactly and a lot of people feel that 300,000 dollars is still not affordable, but it is a step in -- you know, in the door that in most communities right now that's not really an option. So , when I look at it I feel Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 35 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 29 of 53 like the number that we are talking about is maybe an additional -- you know, losing an additional 15 lots and I look at that number compared to how does that affect the overall community that we are requesting and what type of lots that would have and ultimately what price point of homes and whether, you know, we can afford to provide this level of amenity in the community with the fewer lots. So, that's the reasoning for our resubmittal of the design and kind of what we are trying to achieve, I guess, with the community. De Weerd: Thank you. Atalla: Yeah. De Weerd: Your time is up. Council, do you have any questions? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Just one. I -- I appreciate that. It -- the amenity package is -- is fantastic with what you're providing, which probably necessitates the lots in order to coverage it, which I get. Do you think that an application of this size, when we talk about a diversity of housing opportunities, is that a concern that's more appropriate from a citywide kind of macro perspective that we try to address and provide a diversity -- diversity of opportunities throughout the city or do you think we should focus and make that type of requirement upon each individual application? Atalla: Madam Mayor, Councilman Borton, to answer your question, obviously, it's something that does need to be considered citywide and where appropriate . W hen we looked at this site and saw the -- again, the surrounding neighborhoods that also had the little bit higher density as part of their community, like Century Farm, Tuscany, even Sky Mesa that we abut and considering the fact -- now, this may have changed, I don't know, but the Albertson's is supposed to go on the corner, the proximity to the freeway, the proximity to business centers, we felt that this type of density was appropriate and, honestly, we didn't feel like we were asking for, you know, anything crazy, you know, not putting apartment units or anything like that on there, we just felt like in this location t hat level of density and this product type was appropriate. So, I hope that answers the question. Borton: Okay. De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions? Thank you. Atalla: Thank you. De Weerd: Any further testimony? Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 36 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 30 of 53 Warrick: That piece of ground I was raised on. De Weerd: Sir, can we first find out what your name is. Warrick: My name is Roger Warrick. De Weerd: Roger, thank you. Warrick: The ground belongs to my father Paul Warrick. He was born on the corner of Amity and Eagle Road in 1918. That house you see there wasn't there. If you look across the road up from the house, there is a little house with -- with a porch on it and he was born there. He still lives on this property. He will be 101 years old the 23rd of this month. De Weerd: Wow. That is -- congratulation. Warrick: I lived on that property. He was raised across the road from that property. My grandfather rented that place where he was born. Three years later he bought the ground on the north side of the road and my dad was raised there. Then he moved out the day he married my mother and nine months later I was born and I was born in Nampa, Idaho, and, then, he bought that piece of ground ten -- the first ten acres from my grandfather and I was three years old when we moved into that house. He has lived there all that time. He's not in very good shape, but he wants to see this approved and see it go and he has lived in that thing right there within a half a mile all that time. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you. Borton: Thanks for coming. De Weerd: Okay. Is there any further testimony? Matt, any wrap-up remarks? Schultz: Thank you, Mayor, Council. I do appreciate the partial support, Susan Karnes' words. I will take it. Whatever I can get. Some nights -- and I do want to just kind of emphasize that this was not zoned R-4, which was mentioned. It is Comprehensive Plan low and there has been given -- on step-ups said, hey, no more, but it's still in the books. This is a very -- this is a step-up light. Like I said last time, This is a step-up of an inch, not ten feet. This is literally -- in my cover letter that I submitted with this you can see where an R-4 lays out 3.36, the R-8 lays out 3.56. We are really, really, really splitting hairs here and I -- this is not high density, even though we are asking for a step up, we are getting into semantics, but the reality is this is just a handful of lots -- and to Joe's point -- allows him to offer this amenity package, which benefits everybody in the neighborhood. The neighbors as well, more so than having all R-4 lots and I heard a 3.1, which is better than 3.0, but still, like I said, R-4 for does lay out denser than that with ample open space. It just does. And I just would hate to see you guys start shooting down R-4s, even at 3.3. I mean that would be really, really sad if it comes to that. It just wouldn't be the way things have been done around here for -- for a long time. So, in any case, I just want to reiterate that our average in the R-4 is 9,000 square feet and our Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 37 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 31 of 53 average in the R-8 is 6,700 square feet R-8 does allow a 4,000 square foot lot. We are at 5,500 as our minimum and our average is 6,700 and the overall average over the whole thing is right at -- really, really close to 8,000 -- 7,958 square feet overall. So, we are -- our overall average is -- it really is an R-8 super light. It's not a -- it's -- it just allows some dimensional flexibility is really what it's allowing us . It would be really, really close to an R-4. So, in fact, 75 percent of our lots are over the 7,000 -- over 7,000 square feet. So, I just want to reiterate that and, hopefully, we get a motion for approval and we can fulfill Paul's dad's wishes and see this thing go. So, thank you. De Weerd: I like the addition you have of new planning terminology. An R-8 super light. So, you know, our Comprehensive Plan is going to have all kinds of unique definitions; right? Okay. Council, any further questions? Little Roberts: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Madam Mayor, I think this is probably a question for Bill. We had a couple of letters from a gentleman who said that this would give him like three neighbors behind him and it doesn't look like any of the areas that change d would have rectified that. Do you have a map that would show us that? Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I don't have an exhibit for you on that this evening, but if you look on the open space exhibit before you, that gentleman was referring to the westerly boundary of this particular project north of the stub street. You can see there is some lighter lines along that exhibit and those are some White Bark lot lines that were platted with that subdivision, so what -- what he's referring to is there is potential for two lot lines -- two homes facing each lot along the east boundary -- or west boundary along the White Bark Subdivision. So, it's -- it's highlighted in this area here, if you can see the cursor. You can see how the lot lines split between the parcels of White Bark and this particular solution. That's -- that was the e-mail that we received from that gentleman today and that was his concern. Little Roberts: Okay. Thank you. De Weerd: Any other questions? Okay. If there is no further questions for the applicant, those who have testified or staff, I would entertain a motion to close. Or not. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move that we close Item 10-C. Cavener: Second. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 38 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 32 of 53 De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. All those in favor say -- Milam: Sorry. Cavener: 9-D. Milam: Sorry. It's 9-D. De Weerd: That's all right. We knew what you were talking about. All those in favor of closing the public hearing, please, indicate by saying aye. Okay. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I will just jump right in. I don't know where the rest of the Council is. I was -- I was very disappointed to see that after I -- what I thought was fairly extensive feedback from Council, to give the applicant another opportunity to get this right and come back and only see five lots removed to me was disappointing. So, I'm not supportive of this application. I don't know if any members of Council have anything they want to talk about. If not, I'm happy to make a motion. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: And I was hoping to see I guess more -- more lots removed. However, with the amenity package and the nice subdivision and the mix of housing options that this offers, I think this is a nice project. It's barely over the amount. I mean as far as a step up it's barely a step up. It's like a little two inches up and it's 12 or so houses more than it would need to be. So, we are talking about overcrowding and schools, we are talking about 12 houses, which, based on statistics, is like eight kids or something. So, I don't think that this subdivision, the way that it is, is going to, on its own, push schools into overcrowding. That's a whole other problem and that's not one that we have been using necessarily to make decisions on development. So, I am in support of this development. I appreciate the -- the developer has gone -- has been working with the city, gone back to Planning and Zoning and made some changes. It's a better product. So, I'm glad we waited a month. I like it better and I'm approving it. Anybody else? De Weerd: Okay. Milam: A motion. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 39 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 33 of 53 Cavener: A motion is always in order. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move that we approve H-2018-0115. Parsons: Madam Mayor, I'm sorry to interject in the motion, but if you approve this project as you see it this evening, there are some conditions of approval that need to be modified to reflect that approval. We have some conditions here that don't -- for example, as the applicant testified, we are removing that attached product component, so we have elevations tied to the staff report and we have conditions that they depict zero lot lines. So, if you would just allow me to indulge you which conditions need to be removed and modified and, then, I would -- can proceed with an accurate motion, so that we can capture it as part of the record, if that's your pleasure. Milam: Yes. De Weerd: Yes. And that's assuming -- we don't know the outcome. Parsons: Right. De Weerd: But any motion should be detailed. Parsons: Yes. Please. Thank you. So, the first item would be DA provision 1-D. Planning and Zoning Commission did strike the requirement for a tot lot and the applicant does have that as part of their proposal this evening, so we want to add that back into that DA provision. We have condition 2-C that requires the zero lot lines, so if there aren't going to be any attached product as part of this development that condition is no longer relevant and we need to strike it. Condition number nine requires design review for all single family attached homes. Again, if there isn't going to be attached product we don't need to do design review for that particular -- for any of the homes within the development. The other item that I would add is -- as part of the applicant's testimony -- he asked to have the ability to be able to pull a building permit for the clubhouse before a plat is recording. Now, it's something that I discussed with the applicant and other department heads within Community Development and they were amenable to that request, so if that's something you're in favor of you can certainly add that as a provision to the development agreement, that they are allowed to pull one -- obtain a building permit for their clubhouse prior to a plat recording. And, then, the other item is if you're so inclined to agree with the Starks' testimony this evening, add a condition for the upsizing of the two culverts as part of the flood plan study. With that I will conclude my comments. De Weerd: Thank you, Bill. Milam: Madam Mayor, can I just add those comments to the motion? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 40 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 34 of 53 De Weerd: Yes. Milam: Okay. Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. So, I have a motion. Do I have a second? Palmer: Second. De Weerd: Okay. Any discussion from Council? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: And I echo many of the comments Council Member Milam made. I think that the -- the amenity package -- I commend them to really building a quality part of our community is well appreciated. I also think that it's -- in the two and a half years I think that we have heard from -- individuals from the Southern Rim Coalition, I don't think I have ever heard them praise an applicant. So, that's a big deal. That's a really big deal to me and I appreciate your willingness to connect with our citizens and in a real meaningful way. I, obviously, will still be voting against the motion, but it's not because I don't value the quality of the product and, really, a reflection of your due diligence throughout this process. Bernt: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bernt. Bernt: I originally voted in favor of this project. As those who are in attendance know, you know, we value -- I value step-ups and -- and especially the importance of -- of why the discussion -- why we talk about step-ups and the importance of them and why they may or may not affect different areas of our community and so I appreciate that dialogue. I appreciate the applicant making changes to this proposed application. I appreciate the sentiments of the Southern Rim Coalition. You're a strong voice in that -- in that neck of the woods and I value your opinion immensely. I look at this project and I value that -- I also value the -- the diversity of -- that this -- this project brings. It's -- I understand it's -- it may add kiddos to the schools or it may not, depending on who moves in, but I -- I like this project and I know that it is a step up, but it's -- it's a small step up and so with that -- with that said I'm -- like I voted before when I voted for it then and I will be voting for it this evening. De Weerd: Okay. Any further discussion? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 41 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 35 of 53 Borton: Just on the -- as the Comprehensive Plan processes -- it is being revised and this issue of step-ups, I -- I don't know where they are when -- in its discussion, but I'm -- I'm certainly hopeful that it goes away. I think it probably helps applicants, as well as the public, to know if that opportunity is not there -- if an area is intended to be low density, let's -- let's be consistent with what our map says and with what we are telling the community and the applicants can, then, go into it with -- with an understanding that that's -- you know, the rules are the rules with regards to what's planne d there, so I'm not supportive of step-ups now, I'm not supportive of them in the future if they remain in our comp plan as proposed, I just think it's -- it's not appropriate. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: I think the value of the step-up opportunity is to have the ability to do this when it's minimal and makes sense, as opposed to having to go through the process of a map amendment for more significant issues. So, I mean there is going to be cases where this makes perfect sense to do, a minor increase for, essentially, what would be the same project with a few extra houses, whereas it wouldn't be worth the effort maybe even to build it with the level of amenities on a particular lot -- or particular size of land I guess without a minor step-up. So, I think there is definitely value to maintaining it, but at least going away -- Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Well, never mind. It's probably a topic for Comprehensive Plan, not necessarily this application, but -- I'm good. Thanks. De Weerd: Any further discussion? Okay. Mr. Clerk. Roll call: Borton, nay; Milam, yea; Cavener, nay; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Bernt, yea. De Weerd: Okay. The ayes have it. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO NAY. E. Public Hearing Continued from January 22, 2019 for Alicia Court Subdivision (H-2018-0107) by Riley Planning Services, Located 4036 E . Granger Ave. 1. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 6 building lots and 2 common lots on 3.084 acres of land in an R -4 zoning Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 42 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 36 of 53 district De Weerd: So, Item 9-E is a public hearing continued from January 22nd on H-2018- 0107. I will ask for staff comments at this time. Parsons: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Next item on the agenda is the Alicia Court Subdivision. The site consists of 3.084 acres of land currently zoned R-4 and located at 4036 East Granger Avenue. This property was annexed and platted with the Red Feather Estates Subdivision back in 2006. Currently the site is developed with an existing residence and an outbuilding that is to remain as part of the development. The Comprehensive Plan designation for this particular property is medium density residential and the applicant this evening is actually requesting a step down in density from medium density to low density residential. To develop the preliminary plat that's before you it's going to be a six lot subdivision, five new structures and as I mentioned to you, the existing structure would remain on Lot 1, Block 1, which currently takes access to Granger Street. This is a unique property. It's actually -- it abuts Boise on the east boundary and that's where the existing stub street is to this particular property. So, this is right at the edge of our area of city impact and our city boundaries and so the -- as -- although this looks like an extension of a public street, it's actually a common driveway that's going to provide access to five of the new homes within this particular subdivision and, again, the existing home is taking access off a Granger Street. The applicant is requesting a Council waiver for that to remain, because Granger Street is a collector street on the master street map and as you know our UDC tries to limit access to collector streets when a local street is available. So, if the waiver is not granted this evening the applicant would have to redesign the plat, so that it would take access from a common drive that they are -- they are proposing with the five other lots. When the subdivision was proposed back in 2005, '3, '4, '5, '6 when it got final platted, utilities were stubbed to this particular property, hence the reason for the utility slash pedestrian connection into the development from East Granger Drive. This will serve as two purposes. One, it will be a pedestrian connection into the development, but it also will have sewer and water that is brought into the site to serve the proposed development. Because this property is under the five acre minimum, there is no required open space for the subdivision. I would mention to Council that when this particular lot was approved as part of that subdivision that Council at the time did approve the common -- the landscape buffer that's along the adjacent streets to be depicted as an easement in lieu of a common lot. So, currently, the way the code is written all common lots -- or all landscape buffers or open space for subdivisions need to be owned by an HOA and placed in a common lot. This was given a pass back in the day by Council to allow it to remain, along with the current access that you see today. So, really, nothing's changing on that particular property, except for the intensification. So, as far as the step down request in density, so the applicant's gross density is 1.94 dwelling units to the acre, which is quite a bit lower than what we see with the medium density, which is three to eight dwelling units to the acre. I would also mention to the -- the Council that there is an existing fence along the front age of the property as well. Some of that fence does encroach within the required 20 foot landscape buffer that's required along the street and so the applicant has been conditioned to either, one, remove the fence or seek alternative compliance with their final plat application to allow the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 43 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 37 of 53 existing six foot fence to remain in front of the property. It's hard to see on this landscape plan, but it's -- it's delineated right in this location along the south boundary. So, in front of that particular residence. The applicant did provide conceptual elevations. So, due to the lot sizes on this particular property they are proposing larger homes on the particular site. Staff has a condition in the DA -- or at least the plat that homes that back up against a collector street would have changes in materials and modulation in the facade to break up monotonous wall plains, which is a standard condition these days. So, our Planning and Zoning Commission did recommend approval at their hearing. Speaking in favor was Penelope Constantikes. No one testified in opposition. No one commented on the application and we did not receive written testimony and the re were really no key issues of discussion. One of the items that was brought up at the Planning and Zoning Commission, if I can step back here, was the realignment of the pathway. From a Public Works perspective staff felt that it was easier for them to have a straight route for utilities if they were to relocate that utility corridor along Lots 3 and 4 here, but the Commission went ahead and supported the applicant's position on it and left it the way it was designed and, then, also as this is not a required pedestrian connection into the pathway and it will serve as a maintenance road for those utility extensions, the applicant did -- the Commission approved the applicant to construct that pathway of decomposed granite in lieu of asphalt. So, changes to the staff report. Based on what transpired there, the Commission struck site condition -- site specific condition of approval 1.A. They modified site condition of approval 1.B to allow the pathway and common lot to remain in the current location as you see it before you this evening. They did recommend that Council grant the access for the existing home to remain off of Granger Street. They did support the applicant's request for the step down in density and, then, they modified condition of approval 2-B to allow the maintenance road to be constructed of decomposed granite in lieu of the asphalt. So, really, the two outstanding issues for you this evening -- and they are not really outstanding issues, but just something to take under your consideration is, one, the -- approving the step down and, two, allowing the existing home to take access. We did -- staff did receive written testimony from the applicant's representative in agreement with the Commission recs. With that I will conclude my presentation and stand for any questions you may have. De Weerd: Thank you, Bill. Council, any questions? Okay. Is the applicant here? Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Constantikes: Thank you, Mayor. Penelope Constantikes. Post Office Box 405, Boise. 83701. De Weerd: Thank you. Constantikes: Thank you. So, the applicant -- the project team have reviewed the staff report with the updates and concur with the conditions of approval as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and we do respectfully request that the subdivision be approved as designed. Bill brought up several items of note. One of them was the waiver request. I did provide some traffic data with the application and the trip generation or the traffic on both Granger and Grenadier is really pretty low for a collector. The Woods Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 44 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 38 of 53 have lived there for a long time. Their house I think was built in 2003 and their garage does face the street. So, we were hopeful that they would be able to continue to access their property at that location. And this step down in density is a little bit unusual, especially given the conversation that preceded us about stepping up. It provides a nice variety I think without being -- it's a small subdivision, so you're not putting in 20, 30, 40 large lots, it's just a nice size in-fill that buffers the neighbors to the north a little bit and utilizes the property in an appropriate way, given its location. We will relocate or remove the fence that's sitting inside that easement right now, but those will all be converted to common lots with a subdivision. So, all the landscape buffers are going to be parked inside common lots from this point forward. No -- less is always more. Less can be more. So -- and you have things coming up behind us. So , rather than take up time discussing items that are in the staff report or the record from the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, I would be happy to just answer any specific questions that you have . De Weerd: Council, any questions? Okay. Thank you. Constantikes: Thank you. De Weerd: Mr. Clerk. Coles: No -- no sign-ups. De Weerd: Okay. This is a public hearing. Is there anyone who wishes to provide testimony on this item? Okay. Council, any questions for the staff or applicant? Okay. Bernt: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bernt. Bernt: I move that we close the public hearing for H-2018-0107. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 9-E. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Bernt: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bernt. Bernt: I move that we approve Item No. 9-E, H-2018-0107, which includes the approval for the step down in density from MDR to LDR and allow the existing home on Lot 1, Block 1, to continue to access East Granger Avenue. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 45 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 39 of 53 Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion ? And that would include the relocation of the fencing. Bernt: Yes. Thank you, Madam Mayor. De Weerd: Anything further? Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Bernt, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. F. Public Hearing for Bainbridge Franklin (H-2018-0057) by Steve Bainbridge, Located at 2075 and 2155 W. Franklin Rd. 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 3.68 acres of land with a C-G zoning district De Weerd: Okay. Item 9-F is a public hearing for H-2018-0057. I will open this public hearing with staff comments. Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, next item on the agenda is the Bainbridge Franklin annexation. The site consists of 3.6 acres of land, currently zoned R-1 in Ada county. It's located at 2075 and 2155 West Franklin Road. There is no history on this particular property and the Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation is mixed use commercial, which is part of our Ten Mile interchange specific area plan. Originally this application was scheduled to be in front of you -- it originally came with a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission for denial. If you recall, the applicant came back before you in November, I believe, and asked for you to remand it back to P&Z to see if they could correct some of those issues that the P&Z Commission -- some of the concerns that they had -- he heard during the P&Z Commission. We have done that. Staff has updated the staff report to reflect those changes and that's really what I want to dive into this evening as far as Planning and Zoning Commission overwhelmingly supported the changes to the plan and recommended approval to you this evening. I wanted to go and particularly site in with the C-G zoning district, which is consistent with a mixed use community designation and I would let you know that the site is currently operating with a small engine repair business in one of the homes -- the additional lot has a single family residence and typically those are nonconforming uses under our code and so as part of our recommended DA provisions to you this evening we are -- have a provision that -- that those uses cease upon annexation of this property. So, our mixed use community designations -- we typically envision a mix of office, retail, recreation, employment, and other miscellaneous uses on this particular property, in Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 46 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 40 of 53 conjunction with some higher density uses, but given the fact that this is only three acres in size, it makes it a little bit different to get a true mixed use for what's really envisioned for this particular property. I would also mention to you that the target density of a residential component is contemplated for this land use is between eight and 12 dwelling units to the acre. What's happened in the immediate area -- and I think this commission -- or Council is very aware of it -- is we had adjacent properties to the east and to the west that have recently come through -- last several years and done multiple comp plan changes on the property. So, we have added more of a commercial component and less of a residential component, although they did still include a lesser residential component. Staff believes that there is adequate land uses planned within the area and with additional concept plans that envision additional residential. So, in this particular case , given the size of this particular property, we don't feel like the entire site needs to comply with all of those design elements of a Comprehensive Plan, so both planning -- both staff and Planning and Zoning Commission were amenable to not having a residential component as part of this particular development. So, as I mentioned to you, the applicant has provided a conceptual development plan , which we usually get with annexation request. The concept plan before you depicts five commercial pad sites ranging in size between 4,300 square feet -- or structures ranging between 4,300 square feet and 29,250 square feet. The applicant is proposing one access from West Franklin Road, which has been approved by the highway district and as part of the mixed use designations we like to see projects integrated with the surrounding properties. So, you can see to the -- both the west and to the east the applicant is providing cross-access to those properties in accordance with our UDC and in accordance with other development agreements that have been approved with the adjacent properties. One of the items that were discussed at Planning and Zoning -- at least part of this designation is having a consistent design theme in a certain density or intensity on the particular property and so we went back to the drawing board with the applicant. We tried to get them to increase the square footage and the intensification on this property with their office component and come up with really a cohesive design theme and that's what you see here with the back buildings. You can see there is a mixture of single story, two story and three story buildings on this particular site. The back building up along the residential uses here where you can see my cursor, that's going to be an indoor -- potentially an indoor storage facility, which would require a separate conditional use permit, when, in fact, that use is proposed for the site, but conceptually that's what they are proposing this evening and there is a retail component and office component. So, there is a mix of commercial uses on the site, as I mentioned to you, but just not that residential component. I would also mentioned to you -- and I think you're pretty familiar with this, but because the applicant is requesting a C-G zone they are up against multiple family on the east boundary and so if you can see my cursor here, because this zone is up against a residential use typically we require a 25 foot wide landscape buffer between commercial uses and residential uses. That's something that we discussed at the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing and staff is amenable to the ten foot setback that the applicant is requesting, but that does take a Council waiver to reduce that buffer width down from 25 feet to ten feet and that's something that the applicant wants you to take -- to take under consideration this evening. Also part of the mixed use standards is having an open space or gathering area and you can see the applicant has that. That ties into that street buffer along Franklin Road. So, again, not all Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 47 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 41 of 53 the elements are here, but the vast majority of them are here and Planning and Zoning Commission did concur with that as well and that's why they forwarded on a recommendation for approval to you this evening. So, as I mentioned to you, we are recommending a DA with annexation. Nothing too heavy, but, basically, the -- the DA provisions before you this evening require compliance with the concept plan that's before you this evening. We want to make sure that the applicant -- or the development does include a mixture of both single, two story and three story structures on the -- on the site as proposed to be in alignment with the current future land use designation . Of course, if any ordinances change we want the development to comply with those. All those uses and buildings on the site need to be removed upon annexation of the particular property and, as I mentioned to you earlier, we are requiring that they reciprocate cross -access to the adjacent properties and that would be submitted with their first certificate of zoning compliance application. The applicant has provided pedestrian connections to the adjacent properties. So, we require that as well. And, then, they needed to comply with the design standards in the Ten Mile specific area plan as well. So, Item G is the one that pertains to the 25 foot landscape buffer along a portion of the east boundary, particularly where that self storage use is adjacent to the multi-family currently under construction. We have some language there -- unless they obtain a waiver from you this evening. So, it's -- there is flexibility built in for the applicant. The indoor self storage use will require a separate conditional use permit and it needs to comply with our specific use standards in the code and, then, also we want to limit access to this particular property, so we are fine with the one access, but we want to make sure there aren't any future accesses in the -- in the future. So, one access point to Franklin Road is supported by staff and ACHD as well. So, testifying at the Planning and Zoning Commission we had Shawn Nickel. The only key items of discussion at that -- at the Planning and Zoning Commission was the parking. Currently on the concept plan that's before you the applicant is depicting 96 parking stalls. In the staff report I alluded to you that self storage facilities have a lower parking ratio than other commercial uses. So, both Commission and staff felt that the parking ratio proposed on the concept plan was adequate for this particular site that's before you this evening. So, really, the -- there were no changes to the staff's recommended DA provisions and the only outstanding for you this evening is taking under the waiver of the recommendation for the reduced buffer along a portion of the eastern boundary. Staff is recommending and Planning and Zoning Commission is recommending -- has recommended approval. I will conclude my presentation and stand for any questions you may have. De Weerd: Thank you, Bill. Council, any questions? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Bill, this is actually a fine map. Bill, if I'm not mistaken, there isn't any current residential development next to the -- kind of the larger L-shaped commercial building; correct? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 48 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 42 of 53 Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, Councilman Cavener, there is. There is actually what we call the -- the Villas At 12 Oaks. It's a multi-family project -- Cavener: Okay. Parsons: -- along that boundary. So, it's -- it's been entitled, it's been approved through -- for building permits, so it should be under construction pretty soon. Cavener: Madam Mayor, follow up. De Weerd: Uh-huh. Cavener: Do we know how far away that -- when those developments are going to be, then, from this building? Parsons: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I do not have that information for you. Cavener: All right. Thank you. Parsons: Certainly look it up if you -- if you'd like me to pull up the site plan I can certainly dig into that and get that for you. Cavener: We can hear from the applicant and -- maybe. De Weerd: Okay. If there is nothing further, would the applicant like to come forward. Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Nickel: Thank you, Madam Mayor. For the record Shawn Nickel. 247 North Eagle Road, Eagle, Idaho. De Weerd: Hi, Shawn. Nickel: Representing the applicant. Before I begin I just want to say -- very nice tributes and love towards Keith Bird. He will be duly missed. So, thank you for announcing that. We worked very well with -- with staff as you -- as you recall we -- we were requested to go back to Planning and Zoning Commission to address those specific concerns that they had in their first recommendation towards you. Excuse me. Staff did a really good job at kind of guiding us through the waters of that specific plan to make sure we did meet as many of those -- of those standards as possible, including the -- the multiple stories that we have before you. We do request that you consider the -- the waiver of the -- of the 25 foot side setback. I don't have the site plan for that building next door, but I believe it's at least 25 feet from the property line east, which would give it another ten feet to our building. We are in agreement with all the conditions of approval that staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended and I will just stand for any questions. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 49 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 43 of 53 De Weerd: Thank you, Shawn. Council, any questions? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Is that the Ten Mile to the south? What's the southern border of this? Nickel: That -- to the southern boundary. The creek? Borton: Yeah. What runs along the southern border? Nickel: It's not -- it's not the Ten Mile. It's smaller -- it's a smaller ditch. Borton: Okay. Nickel: Yeah. Borton: All right. Okay. Bernt: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bernt. Bernt: One question is -- on the -- on the L-shaped building on the corner, is -- that's going to be an indoor storage facility it looks like? Nickel: Correct. Bernt: Is that a done deal? Nickel: Madam Mayor and Council Member, yes, the -- the applicant is working on the plans right now and we are going to be submitting a conditional use for that, yes. Bernt: Perfect. De Weerd: So, that will need to come back through the CUP process. Nickel: Yes. Bernt: Madam Mayor, follow up. My only concern was the parking, but if that's -- I think that's appropriate parking for that type of business. Nickel: Yeah. It will have very little parking -- Bernt: Right. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 50 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 44 of 53 Nickel: -- demands because of the use. De Weerd: Okay. Any further questions for the applicant? Bongiorno: Madam Mayor, if I may. De Weerd: Oh, hi, Joe. Bongiorno: The Fire Department. Thank you. I want to make sure that the applicant's aware of Item 3.2 in the staff report about the two access points for buildings over 30 feet high. So, three stories will require two points of access. So, those proposed will need to be solidified before you can do that three story building. Nickel: Madam Major -- I'm going to mispronounce your name. Cavener: Chief is good. Nickel: Deputy chief. I will make sure that we coordinate that with your department when we are designing the building. De Weerd: Thanks, Joe. Anything further from Council? Thank you. Nickel: Thank again. De Weerd: Mr. Clerk. Coles: No sign-ups, Madam Mayor. De Weerd: Okay. This is a public hearing. Is there anyone who wishes to provide testimony on this item? Okay. Applicant, any further comment? Thank you. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: If there is no additional comment, I move we close the public hearing on H-2018- 0057. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Borton: Madam Mayor? Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 51 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 45 of 53 De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: Just a comment maybe before a motion. I applaud the -- the applicant and property owner for taking the approach of listening to P&Z, good remarks, good comments, asking for a chance to take a second crack at it. That's a really good approach and this product -- great product here before us I think. So, hats off to you for -- for addressing it the way you did. I will make a motion -- De Weerd: Okay. Borton: -- and see if there is any discussion for it. I'm going to move that we approve H- 2018-0057 as presented and as to the issue of the -- the ten foot -- I believe it's to the east -- is that right? Yeah. That setback to the east. Allowing the ten foot as proposed, rather than the 25 that would otherwise be required. Bernt: Second. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I typically tend to frown on reductions. I think, though, in this particular application it's appropriate. Don't like making a habit of these types of requests, but I think in this particular instance I don't have a lot of concerns. I'm supportive of the motion. And, Madam Mayor, just to echo Council Member Borton's comments -- and I think that's good for our Council to hear -- appreciate staff re-reminding us that the applicant was the one that wanted to go back to P&Z. We don't see that a lot and I -- I echo Council Member Borton's comments. Appreciate you doing your due diligence on that front. De Weerd: Okay. If there is nothing further, Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Bernt, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. G. Public Hearing for Cope Collision (H-2019-0002) by Mussell Construction, Inc., Located 1724 E. Franklin Rd. 1. Request: Modification to an Existing Development Agreement DA Inst. No. 2018-027680) for the purpose of revising the building elevations from those approved in the original agreement Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 52 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 46 of 53 De Weerd: Okay. Item 9-G is public hearing for H-2019-0002. I will open this public hearing with staff comments. Leonard: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. The next project before you this evening is a -- for a development agreement modification. The site consists of 1.73 acres of land. It's zoned I-L and it's located at 1724 East Franklin Road. In 2017 the property was rezoned from I-L to C-G. A Comprehensive Plan map amendment was processed at that time as well. The recorded DA records compliance with commercial design standards in the architectural standards manual. The applicant requests modification to the existing development agreement to revise the building elevations from those approved with the original agreement. Those are on the left -hand side. The original elevations included steel panels with exclusive glass -- or extensive glass storefront and overhead doors. The applicant is requesting a modification to replace the northern glass storefront component with stucco and glass roll-up doors to access vehicle bays on the west side of the site. So, it's over here. De Weerd: I will tell you what, Mr. Bird would have loved that elevation. All that glass. Awesome. Sorry. I couldn't help myself. Leonard: It's a beautiful building for sure. The originally proposed elevations do not comply, so the ones that are on the right-hand side, the ones that they were originally proposing, we actually received revised revision -- or revised elevations, too. So, these elevations do not comply with a couple of the design standards found in the architectural standards manual for commercial districts. Specifically the architectural standards manual requires the buildings include some kind of banding along the base of building to provide a visual anchor and that they use at least two field materials on facades. Staff included conditions in the staff report regarding those areas that need the revision and the applicant has since provided revised elevations. The revised elevations are here and they are more in line with the architectural standards manual requirements for commercial districts. The revisions do provide banding around the base of the building, which is on of staff's conditions. However, staff is still recommending that initial field material be added to the building elevation. The applicant has shown two different shades of gray stucco. Staff would like to see a greater variation in color, additional score lines or some kind of variation in texture to help create more compliance with the architectural standards manual. Staff would also like more information regarding the dimensions of modulation and articulation and recommends that the applicant provide further detail with the CZC and design review application. Staff recommends approval of this project and I will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you, Stephanie. Council, any questions at this time? Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 53 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 47 of 53 Bernt: Just one. What -- what is field material? Like -- like landscaping or is it something else? Leonard: Madam Mayor and Councilman Borton, field material is like the main material that's used. So, we have -- it would be -- and for -- on this example it's the stucco, because it's the primary material. Accent material would be the stone, for example. So, in the architectural standards manual, you know, basically for commercial districts stipulate that they use two field materials. So, two different materials to kind of add variation to the facade, rather than just one wall of one kind of material. Hopefully that answers the question. Borton: Madam Mayor. Yeah. So, if they are being required -- if they were required to comply with the architectural design manual that would dictate how many field materials or -- it reads as though -- it looks as though you're asking us to require an additional fields -- an additional field material. If that's the case we need to make that a recommendation? Leonard: Madam Mayor, Councilman Borton -- I guess, yes, technically, you're right in that at CZC and design review they will be presenting the elevations and they will have to comply with architectural standards manual. In this case we were kind of hoping for a little bit more than their -- they -- I believe that they do comply with that, but we were hoping for a little bit more, just because the original elevations were so nice, I guess, and to help them kind of come into more of the character that's in the area, to kind of be more consistent with the other buildings that have been constructed . Borton: Okay. Leonard: Thank you for the clarification. Borton: That's helpful. Thank you. That's it. De Weerd: Okay. Palmer: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Palmer. Palmer: So, we are going from what was to this, because the applicant wanted to change or because we wanted the applicant to change it? Leonard: Madam Mayor, Councilman Palmer, they wanted the change. Palmer: Okay. Leonard: They originally -- with the comp plan change they agreed to commercial standards and a set of elevations and have since decided that they would rather go this route, so -- Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 54 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 48 of 53 De Weerd: Okay. Anything further? Okay. Would the applicant like to make comment? Good evening. If you will, please, state your name and address for the record. Fledderjohann: Good evening. Mark Fledderjohann. My address is 2022 South Ridgepoint Way, Boise, Idaho. De Weerd: Thank you, Mark. Fledderjohann: Thank you for your time. We decided to change to this type of construction, because a glass structure really isn't correct for an auto body. There are things in the auto body shop that can fly around the shop. They do welding , they do grinding and trying to keep all that storefront clean would be difficult at best. So, the Cope's really feel that this would be a better application for their shop and more meet their needs. So, we would like to change to this type of construction from all the storefront. De Weerd: Thank you. I see that you did this in 2007 when Mr. Bird was on here and we figure that you put all the glass in there to impress him. Fledderjohann: Well, I wasn't involved in the project at that time, so I can't comment on that. De Weerd: I didn't think you needed to. That was in jest. Any questions for Mark? Mr. Bernt. Bernt: Mark, to just clarify, are you in agreement with staff's recommendations for the different elevations and the field color and so on? Fledderjohann: Yes. As -- as you can see from the previous elevation that we submitted we have added the rock around -- the banding around the bottom. We have also added the vertical accents around the building to try and, again, modulate the building and break up the different surfaces. We also modulated the parapet at the top of the building a little bit, so that you have different elevations there. So, it isn't just a large box, but it actually has some character and movement to it. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I notice you also added some purple trees. Fledderjohann: We were thinking of you. De Weerd: Well, some people would call it pink. You know, I would call it pink. Milam: Fuchsia. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 55 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 49 of 53 De Weerd: They are -- they are very beautiful. Fledderjohann: It depends on what monitor you're looking at as to what color. De Weerd: That's true. Milam: It matches my sweater. De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions? Okay. Thank you. Fledderjohann: Thank you. De Weerd: Mr. Clerk? Coles: None indicating that they wanted to provide testimony, Madam Mayor. De Weerd: Thank you. This is a public hearing. Is there anyone who wishes to provide comment on this application? Bernt: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bernt. Bernt: I move that we close Item 9-G, H-2019-0002. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Bernt: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bernt. Bernt: I move that we approve Item 9-G, H-2019-0002. Milam: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Discussion? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 56 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 50 of 53 Milam: Does that motion include the changes that staff is asking them to still make regarding the color or adding another type of field material? Bernt: Yes, I believe -- absolutely it does and the applicant agreed to that in an earlier question I asked him, so I think -- yes. De Weerd: Okay. Any further discussion? Mr. Clerk. Roll call: Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Bernt, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 10: Department Reports A. Fire Department: PTSD /PTSI Legislation Update and Request for Support [Action Item] De Weerd: Item 10-A was vacated and it will be placed on a later date when our chiefs are healthy again. Item 11 : Ordinances A. Ordinance No. 18-1774B : An Amended Ordinance (H-2018-0006 Fast Eddy’s) For Annexation OfA Parcel Of Land Being A Portion Of Lot 2, Block 1 Of Jasmine Acres Subdivision (Book 59 Of Plats At Pages 5,829 Through 5,830, Records Of Ada County, Idaho) And A Portion Of Unplatted Lands, Situated In The Northeast ¼ Of The Southeast ¼ Of Section 32 And The Northwest ¼ Of The Southwest ¼ Of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, As Described In Attachment A” And Annexing Certain Lands And Territory, Situated In Ada County, Idaho, And Adjacent And Contiguous To The Corporate Limits Of The City Of Meridian As Requested By The City Of Meridian; Establishing And Determining The Land Use Zoning Classification Of 150 Acres Of Land From Rut To C -G (General Retail And Service Commercial) Zoning District In The Meridian City Code; Providing That Copies Of This Ordinance Shall Be Filed With The Ada County Assessor, The Ada County Recorder, And The Idaho State Tax Commission, As Required By Law; And Providing For A Summary Of The Ordinance; And Providing For A Waiver Of The Reading Rules; And Providing An Effective Date. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 57 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 51 of 53 De Weerd: Item 11 -A is Ordinance 18-1774-B. Mr. Clerk, will you, please, read this by title. Coles: Thank you, Madam Chair. City of Meridian Ordinance No. 18-1774-B, an amended ordinance File H-2018-0006, Fast Eddy's, for annexation of a parcel of land being a portion of Lot 2, Block 1 of Jasmine Acre Subdivision, Book 59 of Plats at pages 5,829 through 5,830, Records of Ada County, Idaho, and a portion of unplatted lands, situated in the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 32 and the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise meridian, Ada county, Idaho, as described in Attachment "A" and annexing certain lands and territory situated in Ada county, Idaho, and adjacent and contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, as requested by the City of Meridian, establishing and determining the land zoning classification of 1.50 acres of land from RUT to C-G, General Retail and Service Commercial Zoning District, in the Meridian City Code, providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Recorder and the Idaho State Tax Commission as required by law and providing for a summary of the ordinance and providing for a waiver of the reading rules and providing an effective date. De Weerd: You have heard Item 11 -A read by title. Is there any discussion or do I have a motion? Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mrs. Milam. Milam: I move we approve Ordinance No. 18-1774-B, with suspension of rules. Little Roberts: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 11-A. If there is no discussion, Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Bernt, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 12: Future Meeting Topics De Weerd: Under Item 12, any items for this number? For 12. Other than the State of the City is tomorrow at 3:29. I know. What a shock. It is at Wahooz in the gallery event center and the Taste of Meridian is in Wahooz cafeteria or restaurant area. So, they have a nice space and it looks actually pretty roomy. Mr. Bird's funeral is also scheduled for Saturday, February 9th, at noon at the Meridian Middle School. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 58 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 52 of 53 Item 13: Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(a): To consider hiring a public officer, employee, staff member or individual agent, wherein the respective qualities of individuals are to be evaluated in order to fill a particular vacancy or need De Weerd: So, if there is nothing further, Item 13 is the Executive Session. I would entertain a motion. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. De Weerd: I move that we go into Executive Session pursuant to Idaho State Code 74- 206(1)(a). Milam: Second. De Weerd: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to adjourn into Executive Session. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll call: Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea; Palmer, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Bernt, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (8:20 p.m. to 8:34 p.m.) De Weerd: Okay. I would entertain a motion to come out of Executive Session. Borton: So moved. Cavener: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Do I have a motion to adjourn? Cavener: So moved. Borton: Move to adjourn. Milam: Second. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 19, 2019 – Page 59 of 476 Meridian City Council February 5, 2019 Page 53 of 53 De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:34 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR TAMW DE WEERD ATT.ES . C. tAY CO ULb, CI ILCA RK 2 / l9 /) DATE APPROVED ("IV 0r w (✓lel E IDIAN�- IDAHO 1zfi SEAL �/ City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 5 Project File Number: Item Title: Future Meeting Topics - Public Forum (Up to 30 Minutes Maximum) Signing up priorto the start of the meeting is required. This time is reserved for the public to address their elected officials regarding matters of general interest or concern of public matters and is not specific to an active land use/development application. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented underthis public comment section, other than the City Council may request that the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for a more detailed discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to further assist you in resolving the matter following the meeting. Meeting Notes: City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 2/5/2019 Hearing Type: Public Forum Active: ❑ There are no signatures posted for this meeting type yet. Go Back To List I Export To Excel © 2019 - City of Meridian, Idaho Page 1 of 1 http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=154 2/7/2019 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 A Project File Number: Item Title: Approve Minutes of January 15, 2019 City Council Special Meeting Meeting Notes: 9 4PPROVE0 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.A . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Approve M inutes of J anuary 15, 2019 C ity C ouncil S pecial M eeting C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Minutes Cover Memo 1/28/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.Coles, C.J ay Approved 1/28/2019 - 12:55 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 6 of 736 Into Executive Session at 5:02 pm Out of Executive Session at 6:01 pm Borton: I move we adjourn the Executive Session. Milam: Second. De Weerd: It has been moved and seconded to come out of Executive Session. All those in favor ALL AYES MOTION CARRIED. Borton: Move to adjourn. Milam: Second. De Weerd: A motion and a second to adjourn. All in favor ALL AYES MOTION CARRIED. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:01 pm (AUDIO ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) Tamm e eerd, Mayor ATTEST: - AY O ES, CI Y CLERK ,, AUGUS7- > Qo City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 B Project File Number: Item Title: Approve Minutes of January 15, 2019 City Council Regular Meeting Meeting Notes: c✓ I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.B . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Approve M inutes of J anuary 15, 2019 C ity C ouncil Regular M eeting C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Minutes Minutes 1/22/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/22/2019 - 7:51 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 9 of 736 Meridian City Council January 15, 2019 Page 102 of 102 De Weerd: Council, anything under Item 12? If not, I would like to remind you about the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council Legislative Breakfast. It should be an interesting conversation this Saturday at 8:00 a.m. here at City Hall and to also remind you that City Hall is closed on Monday. So, with that, if there is nothing further, I would entertain a motion to adjourn. Cavener: So moved. Milam: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11:47 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) C MAYOR TAMY DE WEERD DATE APPROVED ATTE ��Q HvvvST 7 1 0� 'moo C. J&Y CO S, ClTbaf ERK q U ('��y vi P�1� 1�1 �No W City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 C Project File Number: Item Title: Approve Minutes of January 22, 2019 City Council Regular Meeting Meeting Notes: 0 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.C. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Approve M inutes of J anuary 22, 2019 C ity C ouncil Regular M eeting C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Minutes Minutes 1/28/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/28/2019 - 7:38 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 112 of 736 Meridian City Council January 22, 2019 Page 41 of 41 Borton: And I would move to adjourn. Little Roberts: Second. Bernt: You would? Borton: I would and now I will move to adjourn. I hereby move to adjourn. Little Roberts: Second. De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second to adjourn. All those in favor? All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:26 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR Teq&IY DE WEERD DATE APPROVED ATTEST: PSED AUGvsT, i Ci1V of w C. JAY "LES ITY CL K EIDIAN*-- IDAHO r1 > y� SEAL O JP �ir,Yof rno TREP`J�� City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 D Project File Number: Item Title: Oberg Subdivision Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Easement Meeting Notes: 70 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.D. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Oberg Subdivision S anitary Sewer & Water M ain Easement C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate E asement Cover Memo 1/31/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/31/2019 - 10:06 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 154 of 736 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2019-009468 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 VICTORIA BAILEY 02/06/2019 09:06 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Project Name (Subdivision): —0berg-Subdivision Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Easement Number: #1 Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one casement of this type. (See Instructions for additional information). F --AI THIS Easement Agreement, made this J VI day ofvibn!Q* ruO 20 1Q'between C15 LLC ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV. 03/26/2018 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 5 6 o f 7 3 6 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Tammy d rd, Mayor A st by J y Coles, City Cleric STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) �+ o C./ Ec,�IIDIAN�— IDAHO �&-_ SEAL This record was acknowledged before me ong-5-20 (date) by Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. (stamp) aa�Q watb Notary Signature CHARLENE WAY My Commission Expires: `c3 'PIS '90a� � CpMMISSION 067390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 3/28/22 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV. 03/26/2018 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 5 8 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 5 9 o f 7 3 6 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 E Project File Number: Item Title: Shelburne Subdivision No. 2 Sanitary Sewer Easement Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.E . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Shelburne Subdivision No. 2 S anitary Sewer Easement C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate E asement Cover Memo 1/31/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/31/2019 - 10:10 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 160 of 736 Project Name (Subdivision): SHELBURNE SUBDIVISION NO 2 Sanitary Sewer Easement Number: 1 Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one sanitary sewer easement. ( See Instructions for additional' information). ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2019-009469 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 LISA BATT 02/06/2019 09:06 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 21St day of JANUARY, 2019 between SHELBURNE PROPERTIES ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee" ; Le WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. Sanitary Sealer Easement Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 - Page3(�160A6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 6 2 o f 7 3 6 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) Q0 ED AUGUST Q - O �o CiW(IIV of W IE IDIAN�-- t, IDAHO OSEAL o This record was acknowledged before me on A 5 %o O LR (date) by Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. CHA WAY Notary Signature !� COMMISSION #167390 My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 3/28/22 Sanitary Sewer Easement REV. 03/26/18 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 6 4 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 6 5 o f 7 3 6 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 F Project File Number: Item Title: Silverstone Apartments Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 1 Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.F. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Silverstone Apartments Sanitary S ewer and Water M ain E asement 1 C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate E asement Cover Memo 1/31/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/31/2019 - 10:08 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 166 of 736 RE-RECORD TO CORRECT NAME OF GRANTOR Proieet Name (Subdivisionl: Silverstone Apartments Syitary Sewer & Water Main.Basement Number: Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one easement of this type. ( See Instructions for additional information), ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2019-009472 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 VICTORIA BAILEY 02/06/2019 09:07 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-062221 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=9 VICTORIA BAILEY 05/26/2020 04:18 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE SANITARY SEWER .AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this b�_) day of;abrUC�er , 20 _between Dave Evans Construption LLC ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal CS'rporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described-, and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will. be necessary to' maintain 'and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance, However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2019-009472 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 VICTORIA BAILEY 02/06/2019 09:07 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Project Name (Subdivision): Silverstone Apartments Svitary Suver & Water Main Easement Number: Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one easement of this type. ( See Instructions for additional information). THIS Easement Agreement, made this tDI ) day of �Pbra 20 between Dave Evans Construption LLC ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Munincip�alaorporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV. 03/26/2018 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 6 8 o f 7 3 6 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN // Tammy de e d, 7yZ At&st by CJVy Coles, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) O -Q011-11 AUG5 V � 2 Olyof UE w CIDIAN+ - IDAHO V SEAL 4-) the This record was acknowledged before me on 2-5.2019 (date) by Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. CHART(WWAY C,UiLU&L COMMISSION #67390 Notary Signature NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: STATE OF IDAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 3/28122 os aw r -'b U)0-4cr Water Main Easement Version 03 26 18 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 7 0 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 7 1 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 7 2 o f 7 3 6 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 G Project File Number: Item Title: Silverstone Apartments Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement 2 Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.G. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Silverstone Apartments Sanitary S ewer and Water M ain E asement 2 C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate E asement Cover Memo 1/31/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/31/2019 - 10:09 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 173 of 736 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane BOISE IDAHO Pgs=9 BONNIE OBERBILLIG CITY OF MERIDIAN. IDAHO ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 VICTORIA BAILEY CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO Proiect Name (Subdivision): Silverstone Apartments Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Easement Number: Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one easement of this type. ( See Instructions for additional information). RE-RECORD TO CORRECT NAME OF GRANTOR 2020-066338 06/03/2020 12:21 PM NO FEE 2019-009470 02/06/2019 09:06 AM NO FEE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT _ Silverstone Apartments LLC THIS Easement Agreement., made this Jday ofF , 2019between nwra ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal oration ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever, IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the Proiect Name (Subdivision) Silverstone Apartments Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Easement Number: Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one easement of this type. ( See Instructions for additional information). RE-RECORD TO CORRECT NAME OF GRANTOR SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT 46, Silverstone Apartments LLC THIS Easement Agreement, made this 2-D day of , 202_0 between ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be'constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV. 03/26/2018 purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the r' t- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the bound es of y public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereb granted w 'ch lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall ease and bec a nu11 and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relin shed. THE G NTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor ' lawfully seized and posse d of the aforementioned and described tract of land, an that Grantor has a good and la 1 right to convey said easement, and that Grantor w' warrant and forever defend the tit and quiet possession thereof against /be claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANT OF GRANTOR made herein sding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, he , personal representatives, purcansferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF', signatures the day and year GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) said parties of the fi • part have hereunto subscribed their herein above wri n. This record was acknowledged before me r V I Ci XS (name of individual), [complet representative c acity, or strike the following if signing behalf of . A" &4 4m`pa-(name of entity on executed), i e following representative capacity: of authori such as officer or trustee) (stamp) i (-1 I � (date) by following if signing in a an individual capacity] on alf of whom record was A Iq,eGw% (type Notary Signature I' (/ My Commission Expires: `���' P Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV. 03/26/2018 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 — Page 175 of 736 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: txN2�va�s /�n5rh-cc�N +�' b� r,,�l6ltaw.. n• Evans, �.�.� STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by 10 il Ug kw D . FVQt 5 (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Silverstone Apartments LLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), is the 1"al lowing representative capacity. k C. — rXV4 Uyoh S (type Of' authority such as officer or trustee) "it47iM#it" A �� $rr��lFrM Via, I� BEIC Notary Signature iv _ My Commission Expires: � i,PAN* 0%1%1 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV. 0 1/0 1/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: Lexicon Pro s, Inc., Manager by Dyan Chacon, President STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on(date) by ad0A-- (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of 5i 6✓�4a,e-;F 5 (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: 0-F L.ec't tCk- (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Rceei; 4 qc es --Chc. / k &tAAc¢�eh RHO A SLEY comet #61606 �!OfiARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Notary Signature My Commission Expires:. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV. 01 /01 /2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Tammy W -6r , Mayor 1 tt st by. y Coles, City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) AUGV\ O Z(' IlV o� IIA 0 w of the l This record was acknowledged before me on A 2 (date) by Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. --------- --& CHARLENE WAY��- COMMISSION #67390 Notary Signature NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires:,8r 49:3 goa a STATE OF IDAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 3/28/22 ----------------- Se xC -�- Water Main E sement Version 03 26 18 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 7 7 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 7 8 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 7 9 o f 7 3 6 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 H Project File Number: Item Title: Silverstone Apartments Water Main Easement Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.H. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Silverstone Apartments Water M ain E asement C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate E asement Cover Memo 1/31/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/31/2019 - 10:07 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 180 of 736 Protect Name (Subdivision): Silverstone Apartments Water Main Easement Number: Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one Water Main easement. ( See Instructions for additional information). ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2020-066330 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=8 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 06/03/2020 12:11 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2019-009471 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 LISA BATT 02/06/2019 09:06 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RE-RECORD TO CORRECT NAME OF GRANTOR WATER MAIN EASEMENT Silverstone Apartments LLC THIS Easement Agreement, made this Sy�' day of 20 1 1� between�E)onstruefion I=i=G ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corpotion ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and set -vice said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Project Name (Subdivision): Silverstone Apartments Water Main Easement Number: Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one Water Main casement. ( See Instructions for additional information). RE-RECORD TO CORRECT NAME OF GRANTOR WATER MAIN EASEMENT Silverstone Apartments LLC THIS Easement Agreement, made this 2.0� day of c.� , 20 2� between �� �� ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Version 03 26 18 purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part ovrle right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the b ndaries of ny public street, then, to such extent, such right -of --way and easement h eby granted N ch lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, all cease and me null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely re nquished. THEANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Gra r is lawfully seized and ed of the aforementioned and described tract of land nd that Grantor has a good and 1 ful right to convey said easement, and that Granto ill warrant and forever defend the tr and quiet possession thereof against the 1 ful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENAN OF GRANTOR made herein all be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, h • s, personal representatives, p hasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOIN signatures the day and year GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) said parties of thrst part have hereunto subscribed their herein above w en. This record 3yas/ acknowledged before me \or Om DW I a P4C (name of individual), [completN Nepr'esentative ca acity, ot• strike the following if signing behalf of y'N,ta5 cOtA M d�name of entity on executed), in e following representative capacity: �1 of authority uch as officer or trustee) (stamp) 1/1-1 /11 (date) by the following if signing in a an individual capacity] on b alf of whom record was p- H--O yr (type Notary Signature V My Commission Expires: / t _-72G Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV. 03/26/2018 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: b� k3�lllav� 7j, EvaK.s, �aaKQ�-ems STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on �� � (date) by OilbGtrpk- D. CVAA (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Silverstone Apartments LLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: pave Ev4ns (type of authority such as officer or trustee) a,4,ft64- " E-t` o a. / N1a us: �� .� 04� ��, 0'. Notary Signature `A1 " "� My Commission Expires: ` L 1 ti Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) QO�p (ED AUGUST 20 w N�('ily of E IDIAN*j- IDAHO SEAL This record was acknowledged before me on -J• ol 0 I–I (date) by Tammy de Weerd and C.Jay Coles on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Ok)wbylkw-c-� CHARLNfWAY Notary Signature COMMISSION #67390 My Commission Expires:J'0k$ •A0Q�;z NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 3/28/22 Water Main Easement Version 03 26 18 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 8 4 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 8 5 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 1 8 6 o f 7 3 6 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 61 Project File Number: H -2 -01 - D132 - Item Title: Final Order for Caven Ridge Estates East No. 3 (H-2018- Meeting Notes: 0132) by JUB Engineers, Located between S. Meridian Rd. and S. Standing Timber Way and South of E. Victory Rd. R1 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.I . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal Order for Caven Ridge E states East No. 3 (H-2018-0132) by J UB Engineers, L ocated between S . M eridian Rd. and S. Standing Timber Way and S outh of E . Victory Rd. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate O rder Findings/Orders 1/28/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 1/28/2019 E xhibit B E xhibit 1/28/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/28/2019 - 11:38 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 187 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES EAST SUBDIVISION NO. 3 – FP H-2018-0132 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JANUARY 22, 2019 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF 32 BUILDING LOTS AND 7 COMMON LOTS ON 13.32 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-8 ZONING DISTRICT FOR CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES EAST SUBDIVISION NO. 3 BY: J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2018-0132 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on January 22, 2019 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES EAST SUBDIVISION NO. 3, SITUATED IN SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 188 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES EAST SUBDIVISION NO. 3 – FP H-2018-0132 Page 2 of 3 2018, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 11/13/2018, by BERT J. NOWAK, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 9,” is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated 1/22/2019, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Wendy Shrief, J-U-B Engineers, Inc., a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 189 of 736 issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the F-& iay" 12019. Attest: J Clerk 5a""' o�P(E1A AoUGUST By: o�Q Tammy de e d i w Mayor, Ci f Meridian IDAHO SEAL day of Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR CAVEN RIDGE ESTATES EAST SUBDIVISION NO.3 — FP H-2018-0132 Page 3 of 3 Page 1 HEARING DATE: 1/22/2019 Continued from: 1/15/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2018-0132 Caven Ridge Estates East No. 3 LOCATION: South of E. Victory Rd., east of S. Standing Timber Way I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant proposes a Final Plat consisting of 32 building lots and 7 common lots on 13.32 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district for the third phase of Caven Ridge Estates East Subdivision. II.APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Wendy Shrief, JUB Engineers – 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Ste. 201, Boise, ID 83709 B. Owner: New Cavanaugh, LLC – 3327 N. Eagle Rd., Ste. 110, Meridian, ID 83646 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III.STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. Because the number of buildable lots decreased by one (1) and the common area increased from what was shown on the approved preliminary plat, staff deems the final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat. All development shall comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district as follows: STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EXHIBIT A Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 191 of 736 Page 2 a. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing is required to be installed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. Fencing is not depicted on the proposed landscape plan. The Developer is responsible for constructing fences abutting pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas per UDC 11-3A-7A.7. The landscape plan should be revised accordingly. IV. DECISION Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat within the conditions noted in Section VIII of this report. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 192 of 736 Page 3 V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat (date: 6/22/2017) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 193 of 736 Page 4 B. Final Plat (date: 11/13/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 194 of 736 Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 195 of 736 Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 196 of 736 Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 197 of 736 Page 8 C. Landscape Plan (dated: 11/2/18) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 198 of 736 Page 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 199 of 736 Page 10 D. Common Driveway Exhibit VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development (H-2017-0020, Development Agreement #2017-074871). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Engineer’s signature on the second phase final plat (on or before 1/7/ 2021), or apply for a time extension, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by J-U-B Engineers, Inc., stamped on 11/13/18 by Bert J. Nowak, included in Section VII.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note #1: Remove Lot 8, Block 4 as a common lot as it appears to be a building lot. b. Note #5: “. . . without prior approval from the health authority and the City of Meridian.” c. Easement Note #3: This note is incorrect, revise or delete entirely as applicable. d. Note #4: Include recorded instrument number for ACHD sidewalk easements. e. Reference Documents (sheet 7): Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD Storm Drain. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 200 of 736 Page 11 f. Correct the sheet numbers on Sheets 5 and 6 (i.e. Sheet 5 of 5 9 and Sheet 6 of 5 9) g. Include a note on the plat stating direct lot access to S. Standing Timber Way is prohibited. h. Block “4” should be changed to Block “3” in accord with the block numbering for Caven Ridge Estates East Subdivision No. 1. i. Re-number the lots in Block 3 (currently shown in Block 4) to continue from those in Block 3 to the north in the first phase of Caven Ridge Estates East Subdivision. j. Break Common Lot 8, Block 3 into two (2) separate common lots to accommodate the two (2) common driveways. Common driveways may only serve a maximum of six (6) dwelling units per UDC 11-6C-3D.1. k. Add a note stating Lot 7, Block 4 (conditioned to change to Block 3) is a private park/open space to be owned and maintained by the Developer or assigns. A single- family home is prohibited from being constructed on this lot. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Stack Rock Group, dated 11/2/18 needs to be revised as follows: a. Depict fencing abutting pathways and common open space lots in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A.7. b. Depict landscaping within common Lot 6, Block 4 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E. c. Revise the configuration of Lot 7, Block 4 as shown on the plat. d. Remove the landscaping on the common lot (between the two common lots where the common driveways are located) where driveways are proposed to the building lots. e. Re-number the Lot and Block numbers consistent with the future revised final plat. f. Remove the pathway/grass section between the two (2) common driveways on Lot 8, Block 3 and depict (hinged) bollards on the shared property line between the common lots. The 20-foot wide paved surface shall extend through both common lots and be capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment as required by UDC 11 -6C-3D.4. This driveway was approved by the Fire Department. 6. Homes constructed on lots accessed by the common driveway on Lot 8, Block 3 shall be consistent with the layout and setbacks shown in Section V.D. Lot 8, Block 4 and Lot 29, Block 3 shall be accessed via the common driveway and not via S. Daybreak Pl. 7. Common driveways shall be paved with a surface with the capability of supporting fire vehicles and equipment in accord with UDC 11-6C-3D.4. 8. A perpetual ingress-egress easement for the common driveway shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.8. Submit a recorded copy of the easement(s) to the Planning Division prior to or concurrent with the plat for City Engineer signature. 9. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application is required to be submitted for any future structure on Lot 7, Block 4 (conditioned to change to Block 3), the privat e park lot. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 201 of 736 Page 12 10. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. This phase adds to the dead end water mainlines in sub. The age of water in the system is a concern that will be alleviated when water main connects along Rumple Lane to Meridian Road. 2. The water mainline in Rumple Lane must be 12 inch. This phase is served by Pressure Zone #5 from the south. Existing valves Q14-427 on Standing Timber Way and Q14-441 on Pisa Drive must be closed, and remain closed after construction to separate the Pressure Zones. Place a note on the construction plans to that effect. General Conditions: 3. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via existing mains. Applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provi de service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub -grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 4. Water service to this site is available via existing mains. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 5. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 6. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 7. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all i ncomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 8. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 9. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 202 of 736 Page 13 10. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 11. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 12. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 13. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 14. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 15. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 16. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 17. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 18. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 19. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 20. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 21. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20 -feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 22. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 203 of 736 Page 14 may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 23. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 24. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 25. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 26. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 204 of 736 1 Sonya Allen From:Wendy Shrief <wshrief@jub.com> Sent:Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:45 PM To:Sonya Allen; C.Jay Coles; Charlene Way; Chris Johnson Subject:RE: Caven Ridge Estates East Sub. 3 FP H-2018-0132 REVISED Staff Report Sonya, Yes, I am in agreement with the changes to the staff report. Wendy From: Sonya Allen <sallen@meridiancity.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:40 PM To: C.Jay Coles <cjcoles@meridiancity.org>; Charlene Way <cway@meridiancity.org>; Chris Johnson <cjohnson@meridiancity.org> Cc: Wendy Shrief <wshrief@jub.com> Subject: Caven Ridge Estates East Sub. 3 FP H-2018-0132 REVISED Staff Report Wendy, Per our discussion, I revised the staff report. Please reply if you’re in agreement with the changes. Thanks, Sonya Allen | Associate Planner City of Meridian | Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 | Fax: 208-489-0578 Built for Business, Designed for Living All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. This e-mail and any attachments involving J-U-B or a subsidiary business may contain information that is confidential and/or proprietary. Prior to use, you agree to the provisions found on the Electronic Documents/Data License, which can be accessed from the footer on the J-U-B home page. If you believe you received this email in error, please reply to that effect and then delete all copies. EXHIBIT B Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 205 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 J Project File Number: Item Title: Final Order for Little Creek No. 1 (H-2018-0136) by Little Creek Partners, LLC, Located on the East side of Meeting Notes: N. Locust Grove Rd. on the South side of E. Wilson Ln. I� I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.J . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal Order for L ittle C reek No. 1 (H-2018-0136) by L ittle C reek P artners, L L C , L ocated on the East side of N. L ocust G rove Rd. on the S outh side of E . Wilson L n. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate O rder Findings/Orders 1/24/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 1/24/2019 E xhibit B E xhibit 1/24/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/24/2019 - 4:45 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 206 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1 – MFP H-2018-0136 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JANUARY 22, 2019 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT MODIFICATION TO RELOCATE THE COMMON LOT THAT HOUSES THE CLUBHOUSE AND POOL NEAR THE LOCUST GROVE ENTRANCE AND TO INCLUDE MORE BUILDABLE LOTS IN THE FIRST PHASE FOR LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1. BY: LITTLE CREEK PARTNERS, LLC. APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2018-0136 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on January 22, 2019 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1, LOCATED IN A PORTION OF LOTS 19 AND 20 OF PLEASANT VALLEY Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 207 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1 – MFP H-2018-0136 Page 2 of 3 SUBDIVISION, SITUATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3N., RANGE 1E., CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2018, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 7/10/18, by MICHAEL S. BYRNS, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 7,” is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated January 22, 2019, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Wendy Shrief, J-U-B Engineers, Inc., a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 208 of 736 City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the �Pk�rllQ�l� , 2019. ,641', By: Tammy de erd Mayor, Ci of Meridian Attest: 1_"_ City or w E IDIANt,.- ay Cole-sU N.ZAHO City Clerk �`� SEAL Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1 — MFP H-2018-0136 Page 3 of 3 day of EXHIBIT A Page 1 HEARING DATE: 1/22/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Stephanie Leonard, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2018-0136 Little Creek No. 1 LOCATION: East side of N. Locust Grove Rd. on the south side of E. Wilson Lane in the NW ¼ of Section 8, Township 3N, Range 1E. (Parcel Nos. R7104253810 and R7104253850). I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat modification to include more buildable lots in the first phase and relocate the common lot that houses the clubhouse and pool near the Locust Grove entrance consistent with the approved CUP modification. STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 210 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 2 II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 8.19 Future Land Use Designation High Density Residential (HDR) (15-40 units/acre) Existing Land Use Undeveloped Proposed Land Use(s) Multi-family residential Current Zoning R-40 Lots (# and type; bldg/common) Originally proposed plat for this phase: 29 total lots; 24 bldg/4 common Currently proposed plat for this phase: 34 total lots; 29 bldg/5 common Phasing plan (# of phases) Two phases Number of Residential Units (type of units) 24 Fourplexes Density (gross & net) 11.72 gross/6.38 net Open Space (acres, total [%] / buffer / qualified) Overall amenities and open space is consistent with DA and is allowed to relocate in accord with UCD 11-6B-3C- 2a(3) Amenities Physical Features (waterways, hazards, flood plain, hillside) Settlers Canal crosses the southern part of Little Creek Nos. 1 and 2 History (previous approvals) H-2016-0076 (DA Inst. No. 2016-109494); H-2017-0067; A-2017-0157; A-2018-0013 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 211 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 3 B. Project Area Maps III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Owner/Applicant: Erik Pilegard, Little Creek Partners 2452 Bayview Avenue Carmel, CA 93923 Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 212 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 4 B. Representative: Wendy Shrief, JUB Engineers, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting to modify the final plat approved with File No. H-2017-0067. The original plat for Little Creek Subdivision No. 1 included a total of twenty-four (24) multi-family residential building lots and four (4) common/other lots on 8.19 acres of land. The new plat depicts a total of thirty- four (34) lots, with twenty-nine (29) building lots and five (5) common lots. The applicant is requesting to relocate the open space that houses the clubhouse and swimming pool from the northeast corner of the site (Phase 1 of the development) to the northwest part of the site near the Locust Grove entrance (Phase 2). This revision will be consistent with the CUP modification (MCU) and the CZC that was approved in 2018. The CZC has been approved and construction has already commenced for this development because the applicant was not required to record a final plat prior to construction. During the public hearing for the original CUP (H-2016-0076) the applicant was proposing two (2) accesses off of Wilson Lane. A modification to the proposed site plan occurred during the public hearing because ACHD wanted the site to take access off of Locust Grove instead of having both accesses on Wilson Lane. The relocation of the open space is proposed so the clubhouse and pool can be located closer to the Locust Grove entrance as this will be the main access and the focal point of the development. Note: The applicant was approved to develop this project in two (2) phases. As noted above, a subsequent MCU and CZC has been approved to allow the applicant to develop the project in one (1) phase (see Exhibit VI.E). The City has already approved a final plat for this project. With the approval of the final plat, a common lot, not buildable lots, was shown in the current location approved with the conditional use permit (shown in Exhibit VI.A). A condition of approval for the MCU and CZC was that the applicant process and obtain approval of a final plat modification application to relocate the open space as proposed and increase the number of buildable lots for the proposed four-plex structures with the first phase. Staff has reviewed the open space exhibit provided with this application and has determined by relocating the open space, the site still complies with the open space standards of the UDC and the recorded development agreement. The development still has fifty-one (51) buildable lots as approved with the preliminary plat. If approved, Little Creek Subdivision No. 1 will contain twenty-nine (29) buildable lots and five (5) common lots. V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff supports the modifications to the approved plat for Little Creek No. 1, as proposed by the applicant. Staff recommends approval per the conditions in Exhibit VII. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 213 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 5 VI. EXHIBITS A. Previously Approved Final Plat (dated: 2017) Common lot to be relocated to Little Creek No. 2; replaced with 4 bldg. lots and 2 common lots Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 214 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 6 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 215 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 216 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 217 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 9 B. Revised/Proposed Final Plat (date: 7/10/2018) Common lot to be relocated to Little Creek No. 2; replaced with 4 bldg. lots and 2 common lots Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 218 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 10 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 219 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 11 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 220 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 221 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 13 C. Previously Approved Landscape Plan (date: 4/27/2017) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 222 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 14 D. Proposed Landscape Plan (date: 3/26/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 223 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 15 E. Site Plan Approved with CZC (date: 11/8/2017) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 224 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 16 VII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development (H-2016-0076, DA Inst. No. 2016-109494; H-2017-0067; A-2017-0157; A- 2018-0013). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat by October 4, 2019, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid or a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The modified final plat prepared by J-U-B Engineers, Inc., stamped on 7/10/18 by Michael S. Byrns, included in Exhibit VI.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note #1: Include Lot 29, Block 1 as a common lot to be owned and maintained by the Little Creek Subdivision Homeowner’s Association b. Note #12: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD License Agreement. c. Note #13: Include the recorded instrument number of the license agreement for the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. d. Note #14: Include the recorded instrument number of the development agreement (Inst. No. 2016-109494). e. Easement Note #1: If applicable, revise note to include Lot 29, Block 1 as having a utility easement co-situated. f. Easement Note #8: Include the recorded instrument number for the Settler’s Irrigation Easement. g. Easement Note #10: Include the recorded instrument number for the existing Turn Around Easement. h. Easement Note #11: Include the recorded instrument number for the existing Meridian Sewer & Water Easement. 5. The landscape plan prepared by TTKLA, PLLC, dated 6/1/18 stamped by Terry T. King, included in Exhibit VI.D shall be revised as follows: a. Lot 29, Block 1 shall be landscaped in accord with UDC 11-3G-3E. Common open space areas are required to be landscaped with lawn (either seed or sod) and a minimum of one deciduous shade tree per 8,000 square feet as set forth in UDC 11- 3G-3E. b. Revise to include three (3) trees to the north of Lot 5 as approved with CZC (A-2017- 0157). 6. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility f or compliance. B. Public Works - General Conditions: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 225 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 17 General Conditions: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non- health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 226 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 18 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 227 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 19 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 228 of 736 From:Wendy Shrief To:Stephanie Leonard Cc:Chris Johnson Subject:Little Creek Final Plat Modification Date:Friday, January 18, 2019 12:37:10 PM Attachments:image001.png Stephanie,   I am in agreement with the conditions of the staff report and I would like to request that the project be places on the consent agenda.   Thanks,   Wendy   Wendy Kirkpatrick Shrief, AICP Planner J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 e wshrief@jub.com w www.jub.com p 208 376 7330 c 208 559 1760   This e-mail and any attachments involving J-U-B or a subsidiary business may contain information that is confidential and/or proprietary. Prior to use, you agree to the provisions found on the Electronic Documents/Data License, which can be accessed from the footer on the J-U-B home page. If you believe you received this email in error, please reply to that effect and then delete all copies. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 229 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 K Project File Number: �4-2-N� 'd � �)'� Item Title: Final Order for Paramount Director Subdivision No. 2 Meeting Notes: (H-2018-0137 by Brighton Development Inc. Located on the SW corner of E. Chinden Blvd. and N. Meridian Rd. I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.K . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal Order for P aramount Director Subdivision No. 2 (H-2018-0137 by B righton Development Inc. L ocated on the S W corner of E. Chinden Blvd. and N. M eridian Rd. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate O rder Findings/Orders 1/28/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 1/28/2019 E xhibit B E xhibit 1/28/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/28/2019 - 11:52 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 230 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR PARAMOUNT DIRECTOR SUB. 2 – FP H-2018-0137 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JANUARY 22, 2019 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF 64 BUILDING LOTS AND 8 COMMON LOTS ON 11.64 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R- 15 ZONING DISTRICT FOR PARAMOUNT DIRECTOR SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BY: BRIGHTON DEVELOPMENT, INC. APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2018-0137 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on January 22, 2019 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING PARAMOUNT DIRECTOR SUBDIVISION NO. 2, LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ¼ OF THE NORTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 231 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR PARAMOUNT DIRECTOR SUB. 2 – FP H-2018-0137 Page 2 of 3 2018, HANDWRITTEN DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 2018, by AARON L. BALLARD, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 6,” is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated January 22, 2019, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Kameron Nauahi, Brighton Corporation, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 232 of 736 issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (2 8) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 514" day of F�e�ruo�� , 2019. By: Tamm e eerd Mayor, Ci of Meridian �RUGl� Attest: owe pTEDAsT ❑y "r E w IDIANit- , C. ay Coles m IDAHO Cry Clerk °�2 SEAL Tcb \Pi Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: ( Dated: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR PARAMOUNT DIRECTOR SUB. 2 — FP H-2018-0137 Page 3 of 3 Page 1 HEARING DATE: 1/22/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2018-0137 Paramount Director Subdivision No. 2 LOCATION: Southwest corner of E. Chinden Blvd. and N. Meridian Rd. (NE ¼ of Section 25, T.4N., R.1W.) I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of 64 building lots and 8 common lots on 11.64 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district for Paramount Director Subdivision No. 2. II.APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Brighton Development, Inc. – 12601 W. Explorer Dr., Ste. 200, Boise, ID 83713 B. Owner: Same as Applicant C. Representative: Kameron Nauahi, Brighton Corporation – 12601 W. Explorer Dr., Ste. 200, Boise, ID 83713 III.STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat (H-2017-0064) in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. Because the number of buildable lots decreased by six (6) and the common area is the same as shown on the approved preliminary plat, staff deems the final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. All development is required to comply with the dimensional standards approved with the Planned Unit Development (H-2017-0064); the side and rear setbacks of buildings along the periphery of the development are not allowed to be reduced beyond that required in the R-15 district per UDC 11-7- STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EXHIBIT A Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 234 of 736 Page 2 4A.1. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat within the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat (date: 4/19/2017) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 235 of 736 Page 3 B. Final Plat (date: 11/30/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 236 of 736 Page 4 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 237 of 736 Page 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 238 of 736 Page 6 C. Landscape Plan (dated: 12/3/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 239 of 736 Page 7 D. Common Driveway Exhibit VI. City/Agency Comments & Conditions A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development [AZ-03-006 (DA #103137116); H-2017-0064 (Development Agreement #2017- 066052); AZ-13-005; PP-13-008; MDA-13-010 (DA #113083665); H-2017-0064, (DA #2017-066052)]. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the subject final plat within two years of the City Engineer’s signature on the first phase final plat (on or before December 20, 2019), or apply for a time extension, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by KM Engineering, stamped on 11/30/18 by Aaron L. Ballard, included in Section V.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note #1: “Minimum building setback lines shall conform to the applicable zoning regulations of the City of Meridian at the time of issuance of a building permit those approved with the Planned Unit Development (H-2017-0064) and as required by UDC 11-7-4A.1 per the standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7.” b. Note #12: Include recorded instrument number. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 240 of 736 Page 8 c. Include recorded instrument numbers for the gravity irrigation and pathway easements graphically depicted on Sheets 2 and 3. d. Provide a minimum 5-foot wide pedestrian pathway within Lots 158 (and through Lot 182) or within a common lot adjacent to Lot 158 (and through Lot 182) for access from the sidewalk along W. Lockhart Ln. to the pathway along W. Director Street per requirement of the preliminary plat (condition #1.2.3d). If provided within Lot 158 where the common driveway is located, the pathway should be separated from the driveway by a raised curb. 5. The landscape plan prepared by KM Engineering, dated 12/3/18 needs to be revised as follows: a. Provide a minimum 5-foot wide pedestrian pathway within Lots 158 (and through Lot 182) or within a common lot adjacent to Lot 158 (and through Lot 182) for access from the sidewalk along W. Lockhart Ln. to the pathway along W. Director Street per requirement of the preliminary plat (condition #1.2.3d). If provided within Lot 158 where the common driveway is located, the pathway should be separated from the driveway by a raised curb. b. Depict a concrete pad at the end of the common driveways no more than 5 feet behind the sidewalk sufficient in area to accommodate the receptacles of the residences that take access from the common driveway per requirement of the preliminary plat (condition #1.2.4c). c. Solid fencing on Lots 157 and 161 is prohibited adjacent to the common driveway on Lot 158 unless separated by a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped buffer per UDC 11-6C-3D.5. If fencing is proposed, depict landscaping. d. Depict 6-foot tall cedar fencing around perimeter of the development as proposed. e. Depict fencing around the internal common area as required by UDC 11 -3A-7A.7a to distinguish common from private areas, unless otherwise approved through Alternative Compliance. 6. The common driveway shall be paved with a surface with the capability of supporting fire vehicles and equipment in accord with UDC 11-6C-3D.4. 7. A perpetual ingress-egress easement for the common driveway shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.8. Submit a recorded copy of the easement(s) to the Planning Division prior to or concurrent with the final plat for City Engineer signature. 8. A Design Review application is required to be submitted and approved for all single-family attached structures prior to submittal of a building permit application. Design of the structures shall comply with the residential standards listed in the Ar chitectural Standards Manual and the elevations included in Exhibit A.4. One Design Review application may be submitted for the overall development. 9. On-street parking is only allowed on one side of the private streets; “No Parking” signs are required to be installed on the opposite side of the streets. Where medians are proposed at the entries to the development, no on-street parking is allowed and shall be signed accordingly. 10. The developer shall meet with Terri Ricks, Land Development (208-884-5533), and Joe Bongiorno, Fire Department (208-888-1234), to discuss wayfinding signage for this development. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 241 of 736 Page 9 11. The side and rear setbacks of buildings along the periphery of the development shall not be reduced per UDC 11-7-4A.1. 12. Homes constructed on lots accessed by or adjacent to the common driveway on Lot 158 shall be consistent with the layout and setbacks shown in Section V.D. 13. A minimum of 80 square feet of private usable open space is required to be provided for each unit as set forth in UDC 11-7-4B. An exhibit shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application(s) demonstrating compliance with this requirement. 14. The applicant shall the applicant coordinate with the Fire Department on placement of “No Parking” signs and painting of the curbs red where no parking is allowed so that fire trucks can maneuver the streets (and corners) in the event of an emergency. 15. As mitigation for the long block face lengths that run along the north side of Pavilion and the south side of Lockhart, traffic calming devices shall be provided that meet ACHD standards per requirement of the preliminary plat (condition #1.2.17). 16. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works Site Specific Conditions: 1. The street light plan submitted appears to meet requirements based on a preliminary review. If internal roads are private they are not required to have City of Meridian streetlights. Please show existing streetlights on Chinden Blvd. 2. The existing water mainline stub off of Director Street into proposed lot 151 needs to be abandoned at the main per City design standards if not used. General Conditions: 3. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via existing mains. Applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub -grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 4. Water service to this site is available via existing mains. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 5. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 6. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 7. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 8. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 242 of 736 Page 10 prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 9. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 10. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/o r prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 17. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 18. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 19. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 20. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 21. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 22. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 23. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 24. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 25. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 26. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 243 of 736 Page 11 Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 27. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20 -feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 28. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 29. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 30. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 31. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 32. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 244 of 736 1 Sonya Allen From:Sonya Allen Sent:Thursday, January 17, 2019 3:08 PM To:Kameron Nauahi; C.Jay Coles; Charlene Way; Chris Johnson Cc:Jon Wardle; Mike Wardle Subject:RE: Paramount Director Sub. 2 - FP H-2018-0137 Staff Report for Jan. 22nd Council Mtg Thank you From: Kameron Nauahi [mailto:knauahi@brightoncorp.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 3:07 PM To: Sonya Allen; C.Jay Coles; Charlene Way; Chris Johnson Cc: Jon Wardle; Mike Wardle Subject: RE: Paramount Director Sub. 2 - FP H-2018-0137 Staff Report for Jan. 22nd Council Mtg All, We have reviewed the attached staff report and analysis, and agree with the conditions of approval. We request that this item be placed on City Council consent agenda on January 22 nd. Thank you, Kameron Nauahi | Assistant Project Manager BRIGHTON CORPORATION 12601 W. Explorer, Suite 200 | Boise, ID 83713 Direct 208.287.0504 | Cell 208.830.3629 From: Sonya Allen <sallen@meridiancity.org> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 2:31 PM To: C.Jay Coles <cjcoles@meridiancity.org>; Charlene Way <cway@meridiancity.org>; Chris Johnson <cjohnson@meridiancity.org> Cc: Kameron Nauahi <knauahi@brightoncorp.com>; Jon Wardle <jwardle@brightoncorp.com> Subject: Paramount Director Sub. 2 - FP H-2018-0137 Staff Report for Jan. 22nd Council Mtg Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Paramount Director Sub. 2. This item is scheduled to be on the City Council agenda on January 22nd. The hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Kameron - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk’s office (cityclerk@meridiancity.org) and me by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior to the meeting. If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a written response accordingly, your item will be placed on the consent agenda; consent agenda items are passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: If you are in agreement with the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the item is pulled off of the consent agenda for discussion. If you do not respond to the staff report by Thursday at 3:00 pm, or if you have concerns with the conditions of approval, your project will be placed on the regular agenda. Thanks, EXHIBIT B Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 245 of 736 2 Sonya Allen | Associate Planner City of Meridian | Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-884-5533 | Fax: 208-489-0578 Built for Business, Designed for Living All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 246 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 L Project File Number: Item Title: Final Order for Verado Subdivision No. 3 (H-2018-0138) by DevCo Development, LLC, Located on the SE corner of the intersection of N. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Ustick Rd. Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.L . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal Order for Verado S ubdivision No. 3 (H-2018-0138) by DevC o D evelopment, L L C, L ocated on the S E corner of the intersection of N. L ocust Grove Rd. and E. Ustick Rd. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate O rder Findings/Orders 1/24/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 1/24/2019 E xhibit B E xhibit 1/24/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/24/2019 - 3:54 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 247 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VERADO SUBDIVISION NO. 3 – FP H-2018-0138 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JANUARY 22, 2019 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF 54 BUILDING LOTS AND 13 COMMON LOTS ON 17.35 ACRES IN THE R-15 ZONING DISTRICT FOR VERADO SUBDIVISION NO. 3. BY: DEVCO DEVELOPMENT, LLC. APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2018-0138 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on January 22, 2019 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING VERADO SUBDIVISION NO. 3, LOCATED IN A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 3N., RANGE 1E., CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2019, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 10/30/18, by CARL PORTER, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 3,” is conditionally Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 248 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VERADO SUBDIVISION NO. 3 – FP H-2018-0138 Page 2 of 3 approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated January 22, 2019, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Laren Bailey, DevCo Development, LLC., a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 249 of 736 Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the V._fl nyu , 2019. Attest: �4y Coles ity Clerk 51 By: Tammy de e d aor, Ci Meridian GO�se0FtATED q�CGS C v of o E PIA T IDAND SEAL46/ `�e TREAS�_ Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: buAw wow Dated: o " 5 -;Lol� ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VERADO SUBDIVISION NO. 3 — FP H-2018-0138 Page 3 of 3 day of EXHIBIT A Page 1 HEARING DATE: 1/22/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Stephanie Leonard, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2018-0138 Verado Subdivision No. 3 LOCATION: Southeast corner of the intersection of N. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Ustick Rd., in the N ¼ of Section 5, Township 3N., Range 1E. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant, DevCo Development, LLC., submitted an application for a final plat consisting of fifty (54) building lots and thirteen (13) common lots on 17.35 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district for the first phase of the Verado West Subdivision. STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 251 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 2 II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 17.35 acres Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential (MDR) (3-8 units/acre) Existing Land Use Rural residential and agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family attached and detached homes Current Zoning RUT in Ada County (R-15 approved with H-2018-0085) Proposed Zoning R-15 Lots (# and type; bldg/common) 67 total; 54 bldg/13 common Phasing plan (# of phases) Number of Residential Units (type of units) 54 single-family attached and detached units Density (gross & net) 6.52 gross/12.05 net Open Space (acres, total [%] / buffer / qualified) Open space with this phase is consistent with the preliminary plat. Amenities Dog park and 10-foot multi-use pathway Physical Features (waterways, hazards, flood plain, hillside) Finch Lateral runs across the southeast corner History (previous approvals) H-2018-0085 (DA Inst. No. 2019-000376) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 252 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 3 B. Project Area Maps III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Representative: Laren Bailey, DevCo Development, LLC 4824 W. Fairview Ave. Boise, ID 83706 Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 253 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 4 B. Owner: Brinegar Investments, L.P. 1590 N. Locust Grove Rd. Meridian, ID 83642 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the preliminary plat as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. There are two (2) fewer building lots and the same number of common lots shown on the proposed final plat than were depicted on the preliminary plat. Because the number of building lots has decreased and the amount of common area is unchanged, staff finds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat per the standards listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. Open space planned for this phase consists of thirteen (13) common lots. The proposed open space complies with the overall open space and site amenities approved with the Verado West preliminary plat. A. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The minimum lot size required per dwelling unit is 2,000 square feet; dimensional requirements shall be in accord with UDC Table 11-2A-7 for R-15 district. The proposed final plat depicts 54 building lots ranging in size. The minimum property size of the proposed building lots is 3,081 square feet with an average lot size of 3,573 square feet. B. Access (UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4): Two (2) stub streets are proposed through Verado Subdivision to the east and Chamberlain Estates Subdivision to the south. No public street access is proposed to adjacent arterial streets (N. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Ustick Rd.). C. Common Driveways (UDC 11-6C-3): All common driveways are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. One (1) common driveway is proposed and complies with UDC standards. A common driveway exhibit is depicted in Exhibit VI.C in accord with UDC 11-6C-3D. A perpetual ingress/egress easement for the common driveway(s) is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. A copy of the easement should be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. D. Pathways ( UDC 11-3A-8): The ten-foot multi-use pathway proposed along the Finch Lateral is required to be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8 and UDC 11-3B-12, as proposed. Fencing proposed shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7A-7b. E. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): Attached and detached sidewalks are proposed throughout the development and are landscaped in accord with UDC standards and Comprehensive Plan Action Item #3.07.02C. Attached sidewalks exist along N. Locust Grove Rd. and along a portion of E. Ustick Rd. Detached sidewalk was recently constructed along this phase of development so attached sidewalk was not required for this phase. The gravel that exists between the curb and the existing detached sidewalk along Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 254 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 5 Ustick Rd. shall be replaced with landscaping in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 7C. F. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): Common open space areas are required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3E, as proposed. Street buffer landscaping along E. Ustick Rd. (arterial) is required to be installed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C, as proposed. Stormwater detention facilities shall be designed and installed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-11. G. Qualified Open Space (UDC 11-3G): Qualified open space is provided within Lot 1, Block 8 and Lot 42, Block 4; and 50% of the street buffer along E. Ustick Rd. (arterial). H. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3G): Qualified site amenities for the site consist of the City of Meridian’s ten-foot multi-use pathway along the southeast corner of the site adjacent to the Finch Lateral and an approximately 6,500 square-foot dog park with seating in accord with UDC standards. A public pedestrian easement is required to be submitted to the Planning Division for the multi-use pathway. The easement shall be submitted prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat for this phase of development. I. Waterways (UDC 11-3A-6): The Finch Lateral runs across the southeast corner of the subject property and is proposed to be piped with this phase of development. J. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): Six-foot vinyl fencing is proposed along the perimeter of the development. Five-foot wrought iron fencing is proposed adjacent to common lots and the proposed dog park. The proposed fencing along the common lot is in accord with UDC 11-3A-7b. Details have been submitted with the landscape plan and are included in Exhibit VI.C. K. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): All development is required to be connected to City water and sewer systems; street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City’s adopted standards, specifications and ordinances per UDC 11-3A-21. V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VII of this report. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 255 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 6 VI. EXHIBITS A. Approved Preliminary Plat for Verado Subdivision No. 3 (date: 6/29/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 256 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 7 B. Final Plat (date: 10/1/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 257 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 258 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 9 C. Common Driveway Exhibit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 259 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 10 VII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development (H-2016-0047, DA Inst. No. 2016-119079; H-2018-0085, DA Inst. No. #2019-000376). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat by September 6, 2020, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid or a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC., stamped on 11/30/18 by Carl Porter, included in Exhibit VI.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note #10: Revise “The Movado Community Homeowners Association” to “The Verado Community Homeowners Association” b. Note #11: Include the recorded instrument number of the access and maintenance easement for the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. c. Note #13: Include the recorded instrument number of the development agreement (Inst. Nos. 2016-119079 and 2019-000376). d. Note #14: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD Landscape License Agreement. e. Note #15: Include the easement instrument number for the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. f. Note #16: Revise to include Lot 79, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 8 as common lots to be owned and maintained by The Verado Community Homeowners Association. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Jensen Belts Associates, stamped on 11/27/18 by Kim Siegenthaler, included in Exhibit VI.B shall be revised as follows: a. Location and labeling of Lot and Blocks shall be revised to be consistent with the proposed final plat. b. A public pedestrian easement is required to be submitted to the Planning Division for the multi-use pathway. The easement shall be submitted prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat for this phase of development. c. Landscaping of pathway shall be constructed in accord with UDC 11-3B-12. d. The landscape buffer along E. Ustick Rd. for this phase of development shall be constructed with the first phase of the Verado West subdivision. e. The gravel that exists between the curb and the existing detached sidewalk along E. Ustick Rd. shall be replaced with landscaping in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C with this phase of development. f. Provide details of the benches proposed within Lot 42, Block 4. g. Provide details of the shade structure proposed within Lot 42, Block 4. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 260 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 11 Prior to signature on the Final Plat, applicant shall provide one (1) full-size copy and one (1) electronic copy of the landscape plan and associated landscape plan details to the Planning Division. 6. The Developer shall record CC&Rs that require the HOA to be responsible for landscape maintenance of each of the lots within the Verado West development. A copy shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. 7. Stormwater detention facilities shall be designed and installed in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-11. 8. Homes constructed in this phase shall comply with the following: a. The approved elevations and design guidelines (including the requirement for construction of 1-foot wide fire rated eaves on all four sides) contained in the development agreement and Staff Report for Verado West Subdivision in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached as Exhibit B within the staff report. b. Future homes adjacent to E. Ustick Rd. (Lots 24-35, Block 1) shall incorporate a mix of materials, windows and decorative trim, and two (2) variations in the roof lines to provide articulation and modulation to the side and rear facades that face the arterial street. c. Structures adjacent to E. Ustick Rd. are restricted to single-story in height as proposed by the Developer, with the exception of the following Lots: 26, 31, and 35, Block 1. 9. The developer shall provide the site amenities in the overall Verado and Verado West Subdivisions as proposed on the approved landscape plan for H-2018-0085 and in accord with the qualified site amenity requirements listed in UDC 11-3G-3C. 10. A Design Review application is required to be submitted to the Planning Division for approval prior to submittal of building permit applications for all single -family attached structures on the site. All attached structures shall comply with the standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual (ASM). 11. An underground pressurized irrigation (PI) system shall be provided to each lot in the subdivision in accord with UDC 11-3A-15. 12. A storm drainage system is required for the development in accord with the UDC 11-3A- 18. 13. Prior to the issuance of any new building permit, the property shall be subdivided in accordance with the UDC. 14. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster Sue Prescott at 887-1620 for more information. 15. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works - General Conditions: Site Specific Conditions: 1. Two additional streetlights are required on the streetlight plan. The two streetlights are Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 261 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 12 required on E. Ustick Road. These streetlights can be Davit poles due to overhead utility conflicts. Underground streetlight power for the lights on Ustick is available 200' to the east of the development. General Conditions: 2. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 3. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 4. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 5. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B- 14A. 6. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 9. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non- health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 10. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 262 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 13 with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 12. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 13. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 14. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 15. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 16. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 17. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 18. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 19. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 20. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20 - feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Me ridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 21. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 22. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 263 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 14 Department of Water Resources. 23. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 24. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 264 of 736 From:Laren Bailey To:Stephanie Leonard Subject:RE: Final plat for Verado Subdivision No. 3 H-2018-0138 Date:Thursday, January 17, 2019 3:20:55 PM Attachments:image006.png Stephanie,                 We agree with the revised Staff Report for the Verado #3 Final Plat. Thank you   From: Stephanie Leonard <sleonard@meridiancity.org>  Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 3:11 PM To: Laren Bailey <laren@congergroup.com> Subject: RE: Final plat for Verado Subdivision No. 3 H-2018-0138   Hi Laren, If you agree with the staff report could you send a written response? That way we can try to get you on the consent agenda rather than action items. Thanks! Stephanie Leonard | Associate City Planner City of Meridian | Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-489-0574 | sleonard@meridiancity.org From: Chris Johnson <cjohnson@meridiancity.org>  Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 1:36 PM To: Stephanie Leonard <sleonard@meridiancity.org> Subject: RE: Final plat for Verado Subdivision No. 3 H-2018-0138   Thank you. I have updated in LF and on the agenda.   From: Stephanie Leonard  Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 1:34 PM To: Meridian City Clerk <MeridianCityClerk@meridiancity.org>; 'Laren Bailey' <laren@congergroup.com> Cc: Bill Parsons <bparsons@meridiancity.org> Subject: RE: Final plat for Verado Subdivision No. 3 H-2018-0138   Hi all, I made a couple of revisions per a discussion with Laren, please find the revised staff report attached. Thanks! Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 265 of 736 Stephanie Leonard | Associate City Planner City of Meridian | Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-489-0574 | sleonard@meridiancity.org From: Stephanie Leonard  Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 12:04 PM To: 'cityclerk@meridiancity.org' <cityclerk@meridiancity.org>; Laren Bailey <laren@congergroup.com> Cc: Bill Parsons <bparsons@meridiancity.org> Subject: Final plat for Verado Subdivision No. 3 H-2018-0138   Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Verado Subdivision No. 3 H-2018-0138. This item is scheduled to be on the City Council agenda on January 22, 2019. The hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Clerk – Could you please add the Common Driveway Exhibit to the record? Laren - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk’s office (cityclerk@meridiancity.org) and me by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior to the meeting. If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a written response accordingly, your item will be placed on the consent agenda; consent agenda items are passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: If you are in agreement with the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the item is pulled off of the consent agenda for discussion. If you do not respond to the staff report by Thursday at 3:00 pm, or if you have concerns with the conditions of approval, your project will be placed on the regular agenda. Thanks, Stephanie Leonard | Associate City Planner City of Meridian | Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-489-0574 | sleonard@meridiancity.org Built for Business, Designed for Living      All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law.   Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 266 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 M Project File Number: �4-2U2 -0131 Item Title: Final Order for Vicenza Commons Subdivision No. 2 (H- 2018-0131) by Cottonwood Development, LLC, Located East of N. Black Cat Rd. and W. Gondola Dr. Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.M. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal Order for Vicenza Commons Subdivision No. 2 (H-2018-0131) by C ottonwood Development, L L C, L ocated E ast of N. Black Cat Rd. and W. Gondola Dr. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate F inal Order Findings/Orders 1/17/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 1/17/2019 E xhibit B E xhibit 1/17/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/17/2019 - 8:02 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 267 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VICENZA COMMONS SUBDIVISION NO. 2 – FP H-2018-0131 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JANUARY 15, 2019 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF 39 BUILDING LOTS AND 3 COMMON LOTS ON 12.09 ACRES IN THE R-4 ZONING DISTRICT FOR VICENZA COMMONS SUBDIVISION NO. 2. BY: COTTONWOOD DEVELOPMENT, LLC. APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2018-0131 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on January 15, 2019 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING VICENZA COMMONS SUBDIVISION NO. 2, LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE NW ¼ OF THE SW ¼ OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 4N., RANGE 1W., BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2019, HANDWRITTEN DATE: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 268 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VICENZA COMMONS SUBDIVISION NO. 2 – FP H-2018-0131 Page 2 of 3 11/15/18, by TRAVIS P. FOSTER, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 4,” is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated January 15, 2019, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Matt Munger, WHPacific, Inc., a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 269 of 736 issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ES -Y" 2 day of 2019. By: Tammy de e Mayor, Cit Meridian Community Development Department and City Attorney. Services Divisions of the By:ei-oubu4)Q��LDated: A -5 - ab\ ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VICENZA COMMONS SUBDIVISION NO. 2 — FP H-2018-0131 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A Page 1 HEARING DATE: 1/15/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Stephanie Leonard, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2018-0131 Vicenza Commons No. 2 AKA Volterra North Subdivision (PP-10-004) LOCATION: East of N. Black Cat Rd. and W. Gondola Dr., in the NW ¼ of the SW ¼ of Section 27, Township 4N., Range 1W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant, Cottonwood Development, LLC., submitted an application for a final plat consisting of thirty-nine (39) building lots and three (3) common lots on 12.09 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district for the seventh phase of Volterra North (and second phase of Vicenza Commons). STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 271 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 2 II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 12.09 Future Land Use Designation MDR Existing Land Use Undeveloped Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family Residential Current Zoning R-4 Proposed Zoning R-4 Lots (# and type; bldg/common) 39 bldg./3 common Density (gross & net) 3.2 gross/3.94 net Open Space (acres, total [%] / buffer / qualified) 0.23 acres qualified / 1.9% Amenities None in this phase History (previous approvals) AZ-05-040, DA Inst. No. 106034786; MDA 10-009, DA Inst. No. 111010393; PP-10-004 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 272 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 3 B. Project Area Maps III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Cottonwood Development, LLC. 398 E. Copper Ridge St. Meridian, ID 83646 B. Representative: Matt Munger, WHPacific, Inc. 2141 W. Airport Way, Ste. 104 Boise, ID 83705 Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 273 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 4 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the preliminary plat as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. There are three (3) fewer building lots shown on the proposed final plat than were depicted on the preliminary plat which was the result of consolidation and re- configuration of lots covering the same area. Because the number of building lots has decreased and the amount of common area is the same, staff finds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat per the standards listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. Open space planned for this phase consists of three (3) common lots. The proposed open space complies with the overall open space and site amenities approved with the Volterra North development. A. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: None. B. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The minimum lot size required per dwelling unit is 8,000 square feet in the R-4 zoning district. Lots 4-7, Block 3 in the proposed final plat shall be revised to comply with that minimum requirement. Otherwise, comply with UDC Table 11-2A-5 for R-4 district: (http://sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?book_id=306&chapter_id=20919#s1165278) C. Access (UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4): Two (2) access points are proposed via W. Gondola Dr. (collector). A stub street is proposed to the south, between Lot 30, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2. D. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): A minimum five-foot wide sidewalk is required along both sides of public streets in accord with UDC 11-3A-17D and as proposed on the landscape plan. A five-foot sidewalk exists along W. Gondola Drive. E. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): A minimum eight-foot width of parkway landscaped in accord with 11-3A-17E is required along the proposed stub street to the south (N. Sepino Ave.). The proposed landscape plan complies with this requirement. F. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): Landscaping along W. Gondola Dr. was included and constructed with the development for Vicenza Subdivision No. 2 final plat. G. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): Proposed fencing includes six-foot vinyl and four-foot vinyl with two-feet of lattice. Details have been submitted with the landscape plan and are included in Exhibit VI.C. H. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): All development is required to be connected to City water and sewer systems; street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City’s adopted standards, specifications and ordinances per UDC 11-3A-21. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 274 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 5 V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VII of this report. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 275 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 6 VI. EXHIBITS A. Approved Volterra North Subdivision (PP-10-004) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 276 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 7 B. Final Plat (date: 11/15/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 277 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 8 C. Landscape Plan (date: 11/7/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 278 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 279 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 10 VII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development [AZ-05-040, Development Agreement #106034786; PP-10-004; MDA-10- 009, Development Agreement #111010393]. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat by October 15, 2020, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid or a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by WHPacific, stamped on 11/28/18 by Travis P. Foster, included in Exhibit VI.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note #8: Include the recorded instrument number of the restrictive covenants for the subdivision. b. Note #8: Include the approved addendum to the development agreement - 1st Addendum (Inst. 111010393). c. Note #11: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD Landscape License Agreement. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 280 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 11 d. Lots 4-7, Block 3 shall be revised to comply with the minimum lot size requirements as defined in UDC 11-2A-5 for the R-4 zoning district. 5. Future homes constructed in this phase shall be consistent with the approved elevations and design guidelines contained in the development agreement. 6. Prior to the issuance of any new building permit, the property shall be subdivided in accordance with the UDC. 7. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster Sue Prescott at 887-1620 for more information. 8. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works - General Conditions: Site Specific Conditions: 1. Dead end water mainlines in this phase will create areas that will increase age of water (stagnate) delivered to customers and lower chlorine residual levels making the water more susceptible to contamination. Both dead ends in this phase meet fire flow requirements, but we would prefer to have offsite water built to loop back into the Gondola water main. General Conditions: 2. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 3. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 4. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 5. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B- 14A. 6. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 281 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 12 estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 9. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non- health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 10. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 12. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 13. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 14. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 15. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 16. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 17. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 18. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 19. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 282 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 13 existing street lighting. 20. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20- feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 21. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 22. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 23. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 24. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year - round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 25. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 283 of 736 From:Matt Munger To:Stephanie Leonard Subject:RE: Final plat for Vicenza Commons No. 2 (H-2018-0131) Date:Thursday, January 10, 2019 9:02:34 AM Attachments:image001.gif image002.gif image003.gif image004.gif image005.gif image006.png Stephanie, I am in agreement with the staff report as presented, please schedule this plat for the consent agenda. Matt Munger | WHPacific, Inc. From: Stephanie Leonard [mailto:sleonard@meridiancity.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2019 5:22 PM To: Matt Munger <MMunger@whpacific.com>; 'Shawn Brownlee' <shawn@trilogyidaho.com>; 'Mike McCollum' <mikehmac37@gmail.com>; Bill Parsons <bparsons@meridiancity.org> Cc: Meridian City Clerk <MeridianCityClerk@meridiancity.org> Subject: Final plat for Vicenza Commons No. 2 (H-2018-0131) Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Vicenza Commons No. 2 H-2018-0131. This item is scheduled to be on the City Council agenda on January 15, 2019. The hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions.   Matt - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk’s office (cityclerk@meridiancity.org) and me by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior to the meeting. If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a written response accordingly, your item will be placed on the consent agenda; consent agenda items are passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: If you are in agreement with the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the item is pulled off of the consent agenda for discussion. If you do not respond to the staff report by Thursday at 3:00 pm, or if you have concerns with the conditions of approval, your project will be placed on the regular agenda.   Thanks,   Stephanie Leonard | Associate City Planner City of Meridian | Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-489-0574 | sleonard@meridiancity.org Built for Business, Designed for Living Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 284 of 736 All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 285 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 N Project File Number: H ,201-0133 Item Title: Final Order for Vicenza Estates No. 4 (H-2018-0133) by Cottonwood Development, LLC, Located East of N. Black Cat Rd. and South of W. Gondola Dr. Meeting Notes: Y", I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.N. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal Order for Vicenza E states No. 4 (H-2018-0133) by C ottonwood D evelopment, L L C, L ocated E ast of N. B lack C at Rd. and S outh of W. G ondola D r. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate O rder Findings/Orders 2/1/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 2/1/2019 E xhibit B E xhibit 2/1/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 2/1/2019 - 8:41 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 286 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VICENZA ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 4 – FP H-2018-0133 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JANUARY 15, 2019 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF 29 BUILDING LOTS AND 3 COMMON LOTS ON 12.09 ACRES IN THE R-4 ZONING DISTRICT FOR VICENZA ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 4. BY: COTTONWOOD DEVELOPMENT, LLC. APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2018-0133 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on January 15, 2019 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING VICENZA ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 4, LOCATED IN THE NW ¼ of the SW ¼ OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 4N., RANGE 1W., BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2018, HANDWRITTEN DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2018, BY TRAVIS P. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 287 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VICENZA ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO. 4 – FP H-2018-0133 Page 2 of 3 FOSTER, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 4,” is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated January 15, 2019, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Matt Munger, WHPacific, Inc., a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 288 of 736 issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (2 8) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the �Q�Yl,I()l1'lQ 52019. Attest: 544n By: Tammy d erd Mayor, City of Meridian /':) / I� -// (1(Y O/' O C y dole -4 W X D�Ao V C1 - y Clerk o�2 SEA TREASU���P�v Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning an eve ont Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. nn _ By: ( Dated: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VICENZA ESTATES SUBDIVISION NO.4 — FP H-2018-0133 Page 3 of 3 day of EXHIBIT A Page 1 HEARING DATE: 1/15/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Stephanie Leonard, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2018-0133 Vicenza Estates No. 4 LOCATION: East of N. Black Cat Rd. and W. Gondola Dr., in the NW ¼ of the SW ¼ of Section 27, Township 4N., Range 1W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant, Cottonwood Development, LLC., submitted an application for a final plat consisting of twenty-nine (29) building lots and three (3) common lots on 12.09 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district for the fourth phase of Vicenza Estates. STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 290 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 2 II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 12.09 Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential Existing Land Use Undeveloped Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family Residential Current Zoning R-4 Proposed Zoning R-4 Lots (# and type; bldg/common) 29 bldg./3 common Density (gross & net) 3.41 gross/4.28 net Open Space (acres, total [%] / buffer / qualified) 0.18 acres (2.13%) Amenities None proposed in this phase Physical Features (waterways, hazards, flood plain, hillside) West Tap Sublateral History (previous approvals) AZ-05-040, DA Inst. No. 106034786; MDA 10-009, DA Inst. No. 111010393; PP-10-004 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 291 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 3 B. Project Area Maps III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Cottonwood Development, LLC. 398 E. Copper Ridge St. Meridian, ID 83646 B. Representative: Matt Munger, WHPacific, Inc. 2141 W. Airport Way, Ste. 104 Boise, ID 83705 Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 292 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 4 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat depicts twenty-nine (29) building lots and three (3) common area lots on 12.09 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district. Development is required to comply with the dimensional standards of the R-4 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-5. The common lot for the street buffer along W. Gondola Dr., a collector street, was included in the Vicenza Subdivision No. 2 final plat and constructed with that development. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for consistency with the approved preliminary plats and found there is one (1) fewer building lot than was depicted on the preliminary plat. The applicant has omitted open space from the southeast boundary of lot 1, block 1 which differs from the approved preliminary plat. Because the number of building lots has decreased, Staff finds the proposed final plat to be in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat per the standards listed in UDC 11-6B- 3C.2. However, the applicant shall be required to either provide open space as approved in the preliminary plat or provide a new open space exhibit that demonstrates no reduction in the total amount of open space approved in the preliminary plat. A. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: None. B. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The minimum lot size required per dwelling unit is 8,000 square feet in the R-4 zoning district. Lots 14, Block 3 in the proposed final plat shall be revised to comply with that minimum size requirement. Otherwise, comply with UDC Table 11-2A-5 for R-4 district: (http://sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?book_id=306&chapter_id=20919#s1165278) C. Access (UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4): One (1) access point is proposed via W. Gondola Dr. (collector) via W. Napoli Way (local). Two (2) stub streets are proposed to connect to a future phase of proposed development (Vicenza Commons No. 2) via N. Exeter Way and W. Napoli Way. D. Common Open Space ( UDC): A pedestrian connection to the open space along Lot 1, Block 1 to reflect the approved preliminary plat should be depicted or the applicant shall submit a revised open space exhibit that demonstrates compliance with the open space as required with the approved Volterra North preliminary plat. E. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): A minimum five-foot wide sidewalk is required along both sides of public streets in accord with UDC 11-3A-17D and as proposed on the landscape plan. A five-foot sidewalk exists along W. Gondola Drive. F. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): Landscaping along W. Gondola Dr. and N. Black Cat Rd. was included and constructed with the development for Vicenza Subdivision No. 2 final plat. Landscaping is required along pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. A minimum five-foot wide landscape strip is required along each side of the pathway consisting of a Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 293 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 5 mix of trees, shrubs, lawn and/or other vegetative groundcover. A minimum of one (1) tree is required per 100 linear feet of pathway. Common open space areas are required to be landscaped with lawn (either seed or sod) and a minimum of one (1) deciduous shade tree per 8,000 square feet as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3E. Parkways are required to be landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-G-3B.5. G. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): Six-foot vinyl fencing currently exists along W. Gondola Dr. and N. Black Cat Rd. Proposed fencing within the subdivision includes six-foot vinyl and four-foot vinyl privacy fencing along both sides of lot 2, block 2. The proposed fencing along the common lot is in accord with UDC 11-3A-7b. Details have been submitted with the landscape plan and are included in Exhibit VI.C. V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VII of this report. VI. EXHIBITS A. Approved Volterra North Subdivision (PP-10-004) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 294 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 6 B. Final Plat (date: 11/8/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 295 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 7 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 296 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 8 C. Landscape Plan (date: 11/7/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 297 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 9 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 298 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 10 VII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development [AZ-05-040, Development Agreement #106034786; PP-10-004; MDA-10- 009, Development Agreement #111010393]. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat by October 15, 2020, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid or a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by WHPacific, stamped on 11/28/18 by Travis P. Foster, included in Exhibit VI.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note #8: Include the recorded instrument number of the restrictive covenants for the subdivision. b. Note #8: Include the approved addendum to the development agreement - 1st Addendum (Inst. 111010393). c. Note #11: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD Landscape License Agreement. 5. The landscape plan prepared by South, Beck & Baird, stamped on 11/7/2018, included in Exhibit VI.C shall be revised as follows: a. Depict open space as approved in the preliminary plat or provide a new open space exhibit that demonstrates no reduction in the total amount of open space approved in the preliminary plat as required in UDC 11-6B-3C-2a(3). 6. Future homes constructed in this phase shall be consistent with the approved elevations and design guidelines contained in the development agreement. 7. Prior to the issuance of any new building permit, the property shall be subdivided in accordance with the UDC. 8. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Sue Prescott, at 887-1620 for more information. 9. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works – Site Specific Conditions: 1. Add an additional type 1 light on N. Black Cat Road at the south boundary of the property. 2. Dead end water mainlines in this phase will create areas that will increase age of water (stagnate) delivered to customers and lower chlorine residual levels making the water more Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 299 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 11 susceptible to contamination. Both dead ends in this phase meet fire flow requirements, and will be eliminated when the mainlines are connected to Vicenza Commons Subdivision. General Conditions: 3. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via existing mains. Applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 4. Water service to this site is available via existing mains. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 5. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 6. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B- 14A. 7. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 8. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 9. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 10. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non- health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 10. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 300 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 12 12. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 13. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 14. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 15. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 16. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 17. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 18. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 19. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 20. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20- feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 21. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 22. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 301 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 13 23. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 24. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year - round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 25. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 302 of 736 From:Matt Munger To:Stephanie Leonard Subject:RE: Final plat for Vicenza Estates No. 4 (H-2018-0133) Date:Thursday, January 10, 2019 8:58:52 AM Attachments:image001.gif image002.gif image003.gif image004.gif image005.gif image006.png Stephanie, I am in agreement with the staff report as presented, please schedule this plat for the consent agenda. Matt Munger | WHPacific, Inc. From: Stephanie Leonard [mailto:sleonard@meridiancity.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2019 4:37 PM To: Matt Munger <MMunger@whpacific.com>; 'Shawn Brownlee' <shawn@trilogyidaho.com>; 'Mike McCollum' <mikehmac37@gmail.com>; Bill Parsons <bparsons@meridiancity.org> Cc: Meridian City Clerk <MeridianCityClerk@meridiancity.org> Subject: Final plat for Vicenza Estates No. 4 (H-2018-0133) Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Vicenza Estates No. 4 H-2018-0133. This item is scheduled to be on the City Council agenda on January 15, 2019. The hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions.   Matt - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk’s office (cityclerk@meridiancity.org) and me by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior to the meeting. If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a written response accordingly, your item will be placed on the consent agenda; consent agenda items are passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: If you are in agreement with the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the item is pulled off of the consent agenda for discussion. If you do not respond to the staff report by Thursday at 3:00 pm, or if you have concerns with the conditions of approval, your project will be placed on the regular agenda.   Thanks,   Stephanie Leonard | Associate City Planner City of Meridian | Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-489-0574 | sleonard@meridiancity.org Built for Business, Designed for Living Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 303 of 736 All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 304 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 O Project File Number: H -2-N3—(0["0 Item Title: Final Order for Vicenza Valley No. 2 (H-2018-0140) by Cottonwood Development, LLC, Located East of N. Meeting Notes: Black Cat Rd. and North of W. Gondola Dr. U I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.O. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - F inal Order for Vicenza Valley No. 2 (H-2018-0140) by C ottonwood D evelopment, L L C, L ocated E ast of N. B lack C at Rd. and North of W. G ondola D r. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate O rder Findings/Orders 1/24/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 1/24/2019 E xhibit B E xhibit 1/24/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/24/2019 - 4:16 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 305 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VICENZA VALLEY SUBDIVISION NO. 2 – FP H-2018-0140 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JANUARY 22, 2019 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF 50 BUILDING LOTS AND 6 COMMON LOTS ON 13.8 ACRES IN THE R-4 ZONING DISTRICT FOR VICENZA VALLEY SUBDIVISION NO. 2. BY: COTTONWOOD DEVELOPMENT, LLC. APPLICANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. H-2018-0140 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on January 22, 2019 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of “PLAT SHOWING VICENZA VALLEY SUBDIVISION NO. 2, LOCATED IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 4N., RANGE 1W., CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2018, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 12/12/18, by TRAVIS P. FOSTER, Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 306 of 736 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VICENZA VALLEY SUBDIVISION NO. 2 – FP H-2018-0140 Page 2 of 3 PLS, SHEET 1 OF 4,” is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated January 22, 2019, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit A” and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Matt Munger, WHPacific, Inc., a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked “Exhibit B” and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City’s requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 307 of 736 issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (2 8) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the DY' 2019. Em By: Tammy de e rd Mayor, Ci f Meridian O�19 a0 1 D A Vc�s i 01 V or w E IDIAN�- �OAHO SEAL/ Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. 1 By: Dated: 9-5-901 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VICENZA VALLEY SUBDIVISION NO. 2 — FP H-2018-0140 Page 3 of 3 day of EXHIBIT A Page 1 HEARING DATE: 1/22/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Stephanie Leonard, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2018-0140 Vicenza Valley No. 2 LOCATION: East of N. Black Cat Rd. and north of W. Gondola Dr., in the N ½ of the SW ¼ of Section 27, Township 4N., Range 1W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant, Cottonwood Development, LLC., submitted an application for a final plat consisting of fifty (50) building lots and six (6) common lots on 13.8 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district for the ninth phase of the Volterra North Subdivision. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Description Details Page Acreage 13.8 acres Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential (MDR) (3-8 units/acre) Existing Land Use Undeveloped Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residences Current Zoning R-4 Proposed Zoning R-4 Lots (# and type; bldg/common) 56 lots total; 50 building lots/6 common lots Phasing plan (# of phases) Density (gross & net) 3.62 gross/4.56 net Open Space (acres, total [%] / buffer / qualified) 0.44 acres, 3.2% Amenities History (previous approvals) AZ-05-040, DA Inst. No. 106034786; MDA 10-009, DA Inst. No. 111010393; PP-10-004 (Volterra North) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 309 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 2 B. Project Area Maps III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Cottonwood Development, LLC. 398 E. Copper Ridge St. Meridian, ID 83646 B. Representative: Matt Munger, WHPacific, Inc. 2141 W. Airport Way, Ste. 104 Boise, ID 83705 Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 310 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 3 IV. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the preliminary plat as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. There are the same number of building lots and common lots shown on the proposed final plat what were depicted on the preliminary plat. Because the number of building lots and amount of common area is unchanged, staff finds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat per the standards listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. Open space planned for this phase consists of six (6) common lots. The proposed open space complies with the overall open space and site amenities approved with the Volterra North development. A. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The minimum lot size required per dwelling unit is 8,000 square feet; dimensional requirements shall be in accord with UDC Table 11-2A-5 for R-4 district: (http://sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?book_id=306&chapter_id=20919#s1165278) The proposed final plat depicts 50 building lots ranging in size; with a minimum property size of 8,037 square feet and an average lot size of 9,551 square feet. B. Access (UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4): Two (2) access points are proposed via W. Gondola Dr. (collector). A stub street is proposed to the north, providing connection to the existing Bainbridge Subdivision, between Lot 14, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 3. C. Pathways ( UDC 11-3A-8): Two (2) five-foot pathways are proposed within common Lots 18 and 22, Block 1 and Lot 11, Block 3. D. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): A minimum five-foot wide sidewalk is required along both sides of public streets in accord with UDC 11-3A-17D and as proposed on the landscape plan. A five-foot detached sidewalk exists along W. Gondola Drive. E. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): Landscaping along W. Gondola Dr. was included and constructed with the development for Vicenza Subdivision No. 2 final plat. Common open space areas are required to be landscaped with lawn (either seed or sod) and a minimum of one (1) deciduous shade tree per 8,000 square feet as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3E. F. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): Six-foot vinyl fencing currently exists along W. Gondola Dr. Proposed fencing within the subdivision includes six-foot vinyl privacy fencing along the west side of Lot 29, Block 1; Lot 11, Block 2; and Lot 1 and Lot 11, Block 3. Four-foot vinyl privacy fencing is proposed along both sides of Lots 18 and 22, Block 1. The proposed fencing along the common lot is in accord with UDC 11-3A-7b. Details have been submitted with the landscape plan and are included in Exhibit VI.C. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 311 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 4 G. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): All development is required to be connected to City water and sewer systems; street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City’s adopted standards, specifications and ordinances per UDC 11-3A-21. V. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VII of this report. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 312 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 5 VI. EXHIBITS (ATTACH AS PDF DOCUMENTS TO THE STAFF REPORT.) A. Approved Volterra North Subdivision (PP-10-004) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 313 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 6 B. Final Plat (date: 12/12/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 314 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 7 C. Landscape Plan (date: 11/5/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 315 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 316 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 9 VII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development [AZ-05-040, Development Agreement #106034786; PP-10-004; MDA-10- 009, Development Agreement #111010393]. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat by October 15, 2020, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid or a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer’s signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by WHPacific, stamped on 12/12/18 by Travis P. Foster, included in Exhibit VI.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note #8: Include the recorded instrument number of the restrictive covenants for the subdivision. b. Note #9: Include the original development agreement (Inst. No. 106034786.) c. Note #11: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD Landscape License Agreement. 5. The submitted landscape plan prepared by South, Beck & Baird, dated 11/5/2018 is approved as shown. 6. Future homes constructed in this phase shall be consistent with the approved elevations and design guidelines contained in the development agreement. 7. Prior to the issuance of any new building permit, the property shall be subdivided in accordance with the UDC. 8. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster Sue Prescott at 887-1620 for more information. 9. Staff’s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. 10. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster Sue Prescott at 887-1620 for more information. B. Public Works - General Conditions: Site Specific Conditions: 1. Streetlight plan does not meet the spacing requirements of Meridian standard drawing 6C. Add streetlights as necessary to meet 260' minimum spacing. 2. The water main connection through lot 11, block 3 does not need to be installed. Please Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 317 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 10 remove from plans. General Conditions: 3. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub -grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 4. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 5. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 6. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 7. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 8. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 9. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 10. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 11. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 12. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 13. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 318 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 11 that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 14. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 15. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 16. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 17. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 18. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 19. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 20. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer’s expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor’s work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 21. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20 -feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 22. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 23. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Water Department at (208)888-5242 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. 24. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 319 of 736 EXHIBIT A Page 12 25. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 9-1-28.C.1). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 26. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 320 of 736 From:Matt Munger To:Stephanie Leonard Subject:RE: Final plat for Vicenza Estates No. 4 (H-2018-0133) Date:Thursday, January 17, 2019 9:29:34 AM Attachments:image001.gif image002.gif image003.gif image004.gif image005.gif image006.png Thank you, I am in agreement with the staff report as presented, please schedule this plat for the consent agenda. Matt Munger | WHPacific, Inc. From: Stephanie Leonard [mailto:sleonard@meridiancity.org] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 9:22 AM To: Matt Munger <MMunger@whpacific.com>; Meridian City Clerk <MeridianCityClerk@meridiancity.org> Cc: Bill Parsons <bparsons@meridiancity.org> Subject: FW: Final plat for Vicenza Estates No. 4 (H-2018-0133) Attached is the staff report for the proposed final plat for Vicenza Valley Subdivision No. 2 H-2018- 0140. This item is scheduled to be on the City Council agenda on January 22, 2019. The hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions.   Matt - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk’s office (cityclerk@meridiancity.org) and me by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior to the meeting. If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a written response accordingly, your item will be placed on the consent agenda; consent agenda items are passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: If you are in agreement with the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the item is pulled off of the consent agenda for discussion. If you do not respond to the staff report by Thursday at 3:00 pm, or if you have concerns with the conditions of approval, your project will be placed on the regular agenda.   Thanks,   Stephanie Leonard | Associate City Planner City of Meridian | Community Development Dept. 33 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-489-0574 | sleonard@meridiancity.org Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 321 of 736 Built for Business, Designed for Living All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 322 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 P Project File Number: H-2017-0088 Item Title: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Linder Village (H-2017-0088) by Lynx/DMG Real Estates Partners, LLC, Located at the SE Corner of N. Linder Rd. and W. Chinden Blvd. Meeting Notes: u✓ I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.P. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - F indings of F act, C onclusions of L aw for Linder Village (H-2017-0088) by Lynx/D M G Real E states Partners, L L C , L ocated at the S E Corner of N. L inder Rd. and W. C hinden B lvd. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate F indings Findings/Orders 1/30/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 1/30/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/30/2019 - 7:14 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 323 of 736 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0088 - 1 - CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Zoning of 81.51 Acres of Land from the RUT Zoning District in Ada County to the C-C (63.8 Acres) and R- 8 (17.71 Acres) Zoning Districts in the City; Preliminary Plat Consisting of 16 Commercial Building Lots, 1 Residential Building Lot, 2 Common Lots and 2 Other Lots for Future Right-of-Way Dedication on 78.13 Acres of Land in the C-C and R-8 Zoning Districts; and Variance to UDC 11- 3H-4B.2 for Two Accesses via W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26, by Lynx/DMG Real Estate Partners, LLC. Case No(s). H-2017-0088 For the City Council Hearing Date of: January 15, 2019 (Findings on February 5, 2019) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 15, 2019, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 15, 2019, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 15, 2019, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 15, 2019, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 324 of 736 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0088 - 2 - Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 15, 2019, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for Annexation and Zoning, Preliminary Plat and Variance is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of January 15, 2019, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer’s signature on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat (UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2) years, may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two (2) years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting, the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two (2) year period. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 325 of 736 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0088 - 3 - Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1, the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1) two (2) year period. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11(UDC 11-5B-6F). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six (6) months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six (6) month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of January 15, 2019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 326 of 736 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of 2019. COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOE BORTON COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER COUNCIL MEMBER TREG BERNT COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Attest: C. Coles City Clerk eerd '.r Cily of w E IDIAN� IDAHO SEAL VOTED \ f VOTED j f4 VOTED `leo VOTED A VOTED � _ VOTED VOTED Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: CPa&x4-k)M Dated: City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2017-0088 - 4 - Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT Hearing Date: January 15, 2019 (Continued from: December 18, 2018) TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate City Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: Linder Village – AZ, PP, VAR (H-2017-0088) Note: The Planning & Zoning Commission previously heard this application on August 3, September 7, and October 19, 2017. At the public hearing on October 19th, the Commission moved to recommend denial of the subject AZ and PP requests to the City Council based on the original conceptual development plan for the following reasons: 1) proposed site design/layout (i.e. lack of transition and integration with adjacent residential properties); 2) lack of detail on the concept plan for the eastern and southern portions of the annexation area (i.e. no pedestrian or vehicular connectivity with adjacent residential neighborhood and no plan for a street connection between Linder Road and the east boundary for future connection to N. Fox Run Way); 3) the proximity of higher intense commercial uses to single- family residential uses; 4) 24-hour operation of the Winco store and impacts on adjacent residents; 5) traffic; and 6) access – general consensus that the proposed development plan was not consistent with the MU-C designation in the Comprehensive Plan. City Council heard this application on November 21, 2017 and January 16, 2018. At the hearing on January 16th, the Council voted to remand the application back to the Commission for review of a revised plan that includes a collector street connection from N. Linder Rd. to N. Fox Run Way for access to the traffic signal and take into consideration comments from the hearing in regard to safety concerns pertaining to the extension of N. Arliss Ave., the location of the Winco building, and 24-hour operation of Winco. The following is a new staff report based on the revised plans submitted by the Applicant in response to Council’s decision at the hearing on January 16, 2018. A copy of the previous report for the City Council hearing date of January 16, 2018 can be viewed at: http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/142347/Page1.aspx I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant, Lynx/DMG Real Estate Partners, LLC, has submitted an application for the following:  Annexation and zoning of 81.51 acres of land from the RUT zoning district in Ada County to the C-C zoning district (63.8 acres) and the R-8 zoning district (17.71 acres) in the City;  Preliminary Plat consisting of 16 commercial building lots, 1 residential building lot, 2 common lots and 2 other lots for future right-of-way dedication on 78.13 acres of land in the proposed C-C and R-8 zoning districts; and,  Variance to UDC 11-3H-4B.2 for two (2) accesses via W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26. See Section IX of the staff report for more information. II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed AZ and PP applications; and denial of the proposed VAR EXHIBIT A Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 328 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 2 application in accord with the conditions of approval in Exhibit B and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Exhibit D. Note: The Variance request does not require action from the Commission; the City Council is the decision making body on this application. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on November 15, 2018. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ and PP requests. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Ken Howell, Lynx/DMG Development; Nick Eller; Jim Alexander; Chris Williams; Keith Jones ii. In opposition: David Eastman; Sally Reynolds representing Smart Growth for Meridian; Andrea Carroll; Justin Carpenter iii. Commenting: Mike McCreary; Joe Marshall; Michael Arnold; Frank Reynolds; Ruth Shane; Wendy McKinney; David McKinney; John Ringert, Kittelson & Associates iv. Written testimony: Many letters of testimony were received – see public record v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. Against 24 hour operation of Winco; ii. Desire for traffic calming to be provided on N. Bergman Ave. (i.e. different road design or a traffic circle so as not to create a thoroughfare for high school students and residents); iii. Break up the mid-anchor stores so they’re less of a “strip” development style and more consistent with mixed–use community; iv. Residential uses should be better integrated with commercial uses consistent with the mixed use designation; v. Public benefit of the widening of Chinden Blvd. with development; vi. Appreciation for the loading docks being relocated to the west side of the Winco building and other changes made to the site plan requested by the neighbors; vii. Need for increased walkability of the site consistent with development in mixed-use designated areas; viii. Would like confirmation that a library is going into the development; ix. Against access to the site through the residential neighborhood due to safety concerns pertaining to high rates of speed of vehicles. c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: i. Changes to the site plan due to the location of the CFI; ii. Reconfiguration of Bergman Ave. so it’s not a straight shot off of the collector street into Paramount Subdivision; iii. Possibility of limiting truck deliveries for Winco to daytime hours; iv. Timing for widening Chinden/SH 20-26 and extent of project; v. Traffic calming measures/reconfiguration of Bergman Ave. so that it’s not a straight shot from the collector street into the residential neighborhood (i.e. Paramount Subdivision); vi. Would like to see a library or other civic related use or theatre provided within the development. vii. Desire for a resolution on the collector street connection to N. Fox Run Way and access to the traffic signal at Chinden/Fox Run; viii. The need for services in the northern portion of the City as proposed. d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. Add a requirement for the Applicant to work with Brighton, the adjacent property owner to the east, to finalize an agreement for a collector street connection to N. Fox. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 329 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 3 Run Way (see section 1 in Exhibit B). If an agreement can’t be reached, the project should come back before the Commission for further review. ii. Add a requirement for the Applicant to work with ACHD on the collector street intersection with Linder Rd. where the signal is proposed and the firehouse access is located; and traffic calming measures to slow traffic on Bergman Ave (see condition #1.1p in Exhibit B). iii. Add a requirement for some of the multi-story office live/work units south of Winco to be constructed with the 1st phase of the development (see condition #1.1q). e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. A letter was received from David Turnbull, Brighton Corporation, confirming Brighton will work with ACHD on the alignment and ROW acquisition to facilitate construction of the east/west collector street from the east property boundary through their property to N. Fox Run Way; however, the purchase price of the ROW is yet to be determined. Therefore, the agreement is not finalized as recommended by the Commission to occur prior to Council hearing the application – the Council should determine if the project should be remanded back to the Commission for further review in the absence of a finalized agreement. ii. Council approval of the accesses proposed via N. Linder Rd. and the east/west collector street is required in accord with UDC 11-3A-3 which limits access to arterial and collector streets. iii. The Council should determine if the request for a variance for two (2) accesses to SH 20-26 meets the Findings listed in Exhibit D in order to be granted. The Meridian City Council heard these items on January 15, 2019. At the public hearing, the Council approved the subject AZ, PP and VAR requests. a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing: i. In favor: Ken Howell, Lynx/DMG Development; Craig Slocum, CSHQA; Roseanne Hopfer; Jim Alexander; Nick Eller; Keith Jones ii. In opposition: Michael Arnold; Wendy McKinney; Greg Reynolds; Sally Reynolds representing the Paramount HOA; Drew Ebright; Alicia Muhlestein; Ann Huntington; Andrea Carroll representing Protect Meridian; Jonathan Kahnoski; David Eastman; Bruce Penske iii. Commenting: Joe Marshall; Greg Brown, Russell Corporation; David McKinney; Tyler Wilson; Denise LaFever; Tyrone Quist; John Ringert, Kittleson and Associates iv. Written testimony: Many letters of testimony were received – see public record v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen vi. Other staff commenting on application: Lieutenant Harper; Caleb Hood b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. Concern pertaining to the safety of neighborhood children with cut-through traffic on adjacent residential streets – against the extension of Bergman to the collector street; ii. Against 24-hour operation of Winco and the generation of noise from deliveries during night-time hours in close proximity to residential homes; iii. Would like the Winco building to be re-located to the corner of Linder/SH 20-26 so that its back is toward the intersection; iv. Against the size of the Winco building (i.e. too big for MU-C designation); v. Would like elevated architectural standards for the design of the Winco building; vi. Opinion that the proposed access via SH 20-26 does not meet the Findings for a variance and should not be approved; vii. Against the site layout of the proposed development (i.e. strip design); Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 330 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 4 viii. The need for traffic calming measures/roundabouts to be provided on the collector street and on Bergman to slow traffic; ix. In favor of the provision of services (i.e. grocery store, medical offices, retail stores, etc.) in close proximity to residential uses c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council: i. The provision of a library or some other public/quasi-public use on the site; ii. The agreement with Brighton for the provision of a collector street across their property from the project’s east boundary to Fox Run Way; iii. The consistency of design and materials of the Winco structure in relation to other structures (i.e. retail stores) proposed on the site; iv. The 24-hour operation of Winco and its impact on residential neighbors; v. The Findings needed in order to grant a Variance for access via SH 20-26; vi. The need for the development to have a vehicular connection to the adjacent residential neighborhood so that residents don’t have to go out onto adjacent arterial streets and the state highway to access the site. d. Key Council Changes to Commission Recommendation i. Strike Development Agreement (DA) provision #1.1q that requires some of the live/work structures to be constructed in the first phase of development. ii. The Applicant is required to submit revised conceptual elevations of the Winco building prior to City Council approval of the DA that are more consistent in design and materials with the concept retail store elevations. Council will review the revised elevations prior to approval of the DA; if determined to be consistent, those elevations will be included in the DA – if not, the DA will be pulled from the agenda and the elevations further revised until determined to be acceptable by City Council. (Note: Administrative Design Review of the structure is still required which may necessitate further changes per the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual.) iii. Require traffic calming on N. Bergman Ave. and W. Bacall St. as allowed by ACHD and the Fire Department (see DA provision #1.1p). III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2017- 0088 as presented during the hearing on January 15, 2019, with the following modifications: (add any proposed modifications). Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2017-0088 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2017-0088, as presented during the hearing on January 15, 2019, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The site is located at the southeast corner of N. Linder Road and W. Chinden Blvd. at 1225 W. Chinden Blvd., in the NW ¼ of Section 25, Township 4N., Range 1W. Parcel No.’s: S0425223011; S0425212480; S0425212420 B. Owner(s): Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 331 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 5 Lynx Investments, LP 712 N. Troutner Way Boise, ID 83712 CCPD, Inc. P.O. Box 203 Pendleton, OR 97801 C. Applicant: Lynx/DMG Real Estate Partners, LLC 2537 W. State St., Ste. 110 Boise, ID 83702 D. Representative: Craig Slocum, CSHQA 200 Broad Street Boise, Idaho 83702 E. Applicant’s Statement/Justification: Please see applicant’s narrative for this information. V. PROCESS FACTS A. The subject application is for annexation and zoning, preliminary plat and a variance. A public hearing is required before the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council on all of these applications except for the variance, which only requires Council approval, consistent with Meridian City Code Title 11, Chapter 5. B. Newspaper notifications published on: October 26, 2018 (Commission); November 30, 2018 (City Council) C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: October 24, 2018 (Commission); November 26, 2018 (City Council) D. Applicant posted notice on site(s) on: October 31, 2018 (Commission); December 7, 2018 (City Council); December 20, 2018 (City Council) E. Posted to Next Door: October 23, 2018 (Commission); November 27, 2018 (City Council); December 20, 2018 (City Council) VI. LAND USE A. Existing Land Use(s) and Zoning: This site consists of undeveloped agricultural land, zoned RUT in Ada County. B. Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: 1. North: Commercial (retail/restaurant/vehicle washing facility, fuel facility) and single-family residential uses in Reynard Subdivision, zoned C-3 and MU-DA in Eagle 2. East: Single-family residential properties in Paramount Subdivision, zoned R-8; and vacant/undeveloped property, zoned C-C 3. South: Single-family residential properties in Paramount Subdivision, zoned R-8; and vacant/undeveloped property, zoned C-C 4. West: N. Linder Road; commercial property, zoned C-G and single-family residential uses in Lochsa Falls Subdivision, zoned R-4 C. History of Previous Actions: None Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 332 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 6 D. Utilities: 1. Public Works: a. Location of sewer: Sanitary sewer mains intended to provide service to the subject site currently exists at the current north terminus of N. Arliss Avenue and N. Bergman Avenue. b. Location of water: Water mains intended to provide service to the subject site currently exist at the current north terminus of N. Arliss Avenue and N. Bergman Avenue, as well as within N. Linder Road, and at the west terminus of W. Director Street. c. Issues or concerns: The fire flow at the end of the proposed dead end water main on the east is marginal, and creates a water quality concern. This main shall connect to existing water main on Director St within the road alignment in the Future Residential area, or within the collector roadway extension to Fox Run Way. Each phase of this development will need to be modeled separately to ensure fire flows are adequate. E. Physical Features: 1. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: The North Slough and the Simpson Lateral cross this site. 2. Hazards: Staff is not aware of any hazards that exist on this property. 3. Flood Plain: This site is not located in the Meridian Floodplain Overlay District. VII. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS LAND USE DESIGNATION(S): Approximately 54 acres of the annexation area is designated on the Future Land Use Map as Mixed Use – Community (MU-C) and the remaining 24+/- acres is designated Medium Density Residential (MDR). MU-C: The purpose of the MU-C designation is to allocate areas where community-serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses, including residential, and to avoid mainly single-use and strip commercial type buildings. Non- residential buildings in these areas have a tendency to be larger than in Mixed Use – Neighborhood areas, but not as large as in Mixed Use – Regional areas. Goods and services in these areas tend to be of the variety that people will mainly travel by car to, but also walk or bike to (up to 3 or 4 miles). Employment opportunities for those living in and around the neighborhood are encouraged. Developments are encouraged to be designed according to the conceptual MU-C plan depicted below MU-C MDR Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 333 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 7 (Figure 3-3 in the Comprehensive Plan, pg. 27). Developments should have a mix of at least 3 land use types [i.e. commercial (includes retail, restaurants, etc.), office, residential, civic (includes public open space, parks, entertainment venues, etc.), and industrial]; residential uses should comprise a minimum of 20% of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 15 units/acre; non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings; vertically integrated structures are encouraged; supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks, plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools that comprise a minimum of 5% of the development area are required. MDR: The purpose of the MDR designation is to allow smaller lots for residential purposes within City limits. Uses may include single-family homes at gross densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre (d.u./acre). TRANSPORTATION: The Master Street Map (MSM) does not depict any collector streets planned across this site. However, a collector street is proposed, as recommended by City and ACHD staff, from Linder Rd. to N. Fox Run Way, which will serve as a backage road to SH 20-26 and provide access to the signals SH 20-26 at those intersections. As part of this development project, Chinden Blvd. is planned to be widened to 5 lanes from N. Linder to N. Meridian Rd. in Phase 1 (2020) and ultimately to N. Locust Grove Rd. in Phase 2 (2021). ACHD plans to widen Linder Road from Cayuse Creek (1/4 mile south of this site) north to Chinden in 2019. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The applicant proposes to develop the site with a mix of uses consisting of specialty retail and restaurants, fast/casual food and beverage, automotive/fuel sales, mixed retail/health and medical, entertainment/soft goods, retail/civic (i.e. library), community grocery, live/work retail, future office/retail and future residential development as shown on the Use Area Plan included in Exhibit A.3. Smaller building pads and buildings are proposed along the periphery of the development adjacent to arterial streets with the larger anchor, mid-anchor and office buildings proposed internal to the site adjacent to the future collector street and future residential development in a linear “strip” Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 334 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 8 configuration. This site layout and configuration is not consistent with the concept MU-C plan depicted above because the smaller commercial pads/buildings are fronting on the adjacent arterial streets rather than the larger commercial buildings. Additionally, the linear “strip” configuration of the large and mid-anchor buildings is not desired in MU-C areas. However, there is a large variety of uses proposed within the development and although larger structures and the east/west drive-aisle are depicted in a linear arrangement, they are broken up and separated by the plaza/esplanade area and are not a continuous strip of buildings. Additionally, the proposed east/west collector street will assist in providing a separation or a transition between the mixed use commercial and future residential area. The truck maneuvering area and loading docks for Winco located on the west side of the building facing Linder and Chinden away from the future residential area is also an improvement from previous versions of the concept plan. Staff is generally in favor of the plan although it doesn’t entirely comply with the design elements preferred in MU-C designated areas. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & ACTION ITEMS: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property (staff analysis in italics):  “Support a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, medium-high and high-density single-family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities.” (3.07.01E) The southern 17+/- acre portion of the site is proposed to develop with single-family homes although a specific development plan is not proposed at this time. Staff is unaware of how “affordable” the units will be.  “Provide housing options close to employment and shopping centers.” (3.07.02D) The single-family homes and living units proposed above office and retail uses (i.e. vertically integrated) will provide housing options near employment and shopping uses proposed within this development and across Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26 to the north (i.e. Fred Meyer and other commercial uses).  “Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels.” (3.06.01F) There are existing single-family residential detached homes adjacent to the south and east boundaries of this site in Paramount Subdivision. The proposed future residential development along the southern boundary of this site should provide a buffer and transition to the proposed commercial and office uses on this site and protect existing residential properties.  “Plan for and encourage services like health care, daycare, grocery stores and recreational areas to be built within walking distance of residential dwellings.” (2.01.01C) The proposed grocery store will be within walking distance of residences in the nearby vicinity as well as those proposed with this development. The proposed park will provide a recreational area in close proximity to residential uses. The proposed library will also provide a needed service in this area within walking distance of nearby residences.  “Work with transportation agencies and private property owners to preserve transportation corridors, future transit routes and infrastructure, road and highway extensions, and to facilitate access management planning.” (3.01.01J) City staff has been coordinating with both the applicant and the transportation authorities (i.e. ACHD and ITD) on this project. See discussion above under Transportation. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 335 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 9 The City has policies limiting access points to arterial and collector streets and prohibits new accesses to State highways. The proposed site plan shows two direct access points to SH 20- 26; (3) access points to Linder Road, an arterial street; and (6) access points to the future collector street. Every additional access is a point of conflict that can impact roadway functionality.  “Review new development for appropriate opportunities to connect local roads and collectors to adjacent properties (stub streets).” (3.03.02O) The proposed collector street will serve as a backage road along SH 20-26 and provide a connection between Linder and Fox Run and the traffic signals at SH 20-26/Linder and SH 20-26/Fox Run. The (3) local streets that stub to the subject property from Paramount Subdivision will be extended with development and (2) connections are proposed to the collector street for improved circulation between the residential and future mixed use development.  “Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system.” (3.03.03B) Pedestrian sidewalks/pathways are depicted on the site circulation plan included in Exhibit A.3 throughout the development with connections from the perimeter sidewalks along Linder, Chinden and the collector street between the residential and mixed use development.  “Identify transitional areas to buffer commercial and residential uses, to allow uses such as offices and other low intensity uses.” (3.05.03A) The proposed collector street, associated street buffer landscaping, library, multi-story office/residential/retail and large office building will provide a transition from the future residential development to more intense commercial uses.  “Coordinate with public works, police, and fire departments on proposed annexation and development requests, and the impacts on services.” (3.04.01H) Comments from these service providers are included in Exhibit B of this report.  “Plan for a variety of commercial and retail opportunities within the Area of City Impact.” (3.05.01J) The proposed development should offer a large variety of commercial and retail opportunities for residents and commuters in the northern portion of the City.  “Minimize noise, odor, air pollution, and visual pollution in industrial and commercial development adjacent to residential areas.” (3.06.01B) The proposed site plan shows generous landscape buffers to buffer commercial from single- family residential areas. However, the applicant is proposing a 24-hour use (i.e. Winco). Staff has some concerns about hours of operation for the grocery store, although the loading area is proposed on the west side of the building adjacent to Linder Road away from the residences, which should reduce disturbances to neighbors.  “Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City.” (3.01.01F) This property is contiguous to land that has already been annexed into the City. Urban services can be provided to this property upon development.  “Require neighborhood and community commercial areas to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses (e.g., landscaping, fences, etc.). (3.05.02A) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 336 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 10 The concept plan depicts internal parking lot landscaping and street buffers along existing streets (i.e. Linder and Chinden) and along the portion of the collector street that is proposed to develop in the first phase (see Exhibit A.2).  “Evaluate comprehensive impact of growth in all land use decisions (e.g., traffic impacts, school enrollment, parks, etc).” (3.01.01B) Agency comments are included in Exhibit B of this report.  “Consider the adopted COMPASS regional long-range transportation plan in all land-use decisions.” (3.03.02G) See COMPASS’ comments in Exhibit B.  “Consider ACHD’s Master Street Map (MSM) in all land use decisions.” (3.03.04K) As noted in 3.03.02O, the MSM does not show any new arterial or collector roadways in this area. However, the proposed collector street as recommended and supported by Staff will serve as a backage road along SH 20-26 and provide much needed access to the traffic signals at Chinden/Linder and Chinden/Fox Run.  “Protect citizen investments in existing public facilities (water, sewer, streets, fire, police, etc.) by encouraging controlled growth through development application reviews and development agreements.” (3.04.01G) The proposed project is surrounded by urban development and would be well served by the City.  “Coordinate with transportation agencies to ensure provision of services and transit development.” (6.02.02H) A bus stop is depicted on the Circulation Plan in Exhibit A.4 along Linder Road just north of the proposed collector street by Pad L; coordinate with VRT on the future location and design. In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in all Mixed Use areas: (Staff’s analysis in italics) • Residential densities should be a minimum of six dwellings/acre. The density of the future residential development area should be a minimum of 6 units per acre. • Where feasible, higher density and/or multi-family residential development will be encouraged, especially for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69. Although still considered medium density, smaller lots (i.e. higher density) for single-family detached and attached homes are proposed adjacent to existing single-family detached (medium density) homes on larger lots in Paramount Subdivision to the south and east of this site. The vertically integrated residential proposed within the mixed use portion of the site will be higher density. • A conceptual site plan for the entire mixed-use area should be included in the application. A concept site plan was submitted for the entire mixed-use area and is included in Exhibit A.2. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 337 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 11 • In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed (not residential), the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common, usable area, such as a plaza or green space. The concept plan depicts a plaza in the area where the markets and library are proposed as well as an esplanade to the north around the 2-story live/work structures central to the development. • The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low- or medium-density residential development. The proposed concept plan depicts (smaller lot) medium density residential development adjacent to existing (larger lot) medium density residential uses to the south and east. Densely landscaped street buffers with berms are proposed along the collector street which separates the mixed use development from the future and existing residential development. • A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses [i.e. commercial (includes retail, restaurants, etc.), office, residential, civic (includes public open space, parks, entertainment venues, etc.), and industrial]. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis. The proposed concept plan depicts commercial (retail/restaurants), office, residential (vertically integrated live/work, single-family residential) and library uses in accord with this requirement. • Community-serving facilities such as hospitals, churches, schools, parks, daycares, civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments. A library is proposed within this development in the central plaza area and a park is proposed at the southwest corner of the site adjacent to the future residential development area. Rocky Mountain High School, Paramount Elementary School, a fire station, and a church exist to the south within a ¼ mile of this site. A City park exists approximately a mile away to the west on Ten Mile Road. • Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks, plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count. The concept plan depicts a plaza area by the library central to the development and a park on the south side of the collector street adjacent to the future residential development. • All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians. Three (3) stub streets exist to this site that are proposed to be extended with development for interconnectivity between the residential and commercial development; this will enable nearby residents to access the site without having to travel out onto Linder Rd. and/or Chinden Blvd. which will decrease traffic on these roadways. Staff recommends N. Bergman Ave. is extended to the collector street with the first phase of development. • Street sections consistent with the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map are required within the Unified Development Code. The developer will be required to dedicate right-of-way along Linder Road and within the site as required by ACHD; right-of-way along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26 should be dedicated and/or reserved for future dedication as required by ITD. • Because of the existing small lots within Old Town, development is not subject to the Mixed- Use standards listed herein. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 338 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 12 The proposed development is not within Old Town. In reviewing development applications, the following items will be considered in MU-C areas: • Development should comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed-Use areas. See above. • All developments should have a mix of at least three land use types. The concept plan depicts commercial, residential, office and civic uses. • Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 20% of the development area at densities ranging from 6 to 15 units/acre. Residential uses are proposed for approximately 20% of the development area; development within the future residential area should reflect a residential gross density of at least 6 units per acre. • Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings. The elevations submitted by the Applicant for the future residential area are 2 stories in height which should be proportional to the adjacent future commercial structures; the street buffer landscaping along both sides of the collector street should also assist in buffering the residential from the commercial area. The elevations submitted with future Certificate of Zoning Compliance applications for the commercial structures should be proportional to and blend in with the design of the future adjacent residential buildings. • Vertically integrated structures are encouraged. Four (4) 2-story vertically integrated (residential/office) structures are proposed near the plaza and library; and (2) vertically integrated (office/residential/retail) structures are proposed across from the park area on the concept plan. • Unless a structure contains a mix of both residential and office, or residential and commercial land uses, maximum building size should be limited to a 30,000 square-foot building footprint. For community grocery stores, the maximum building size should be limited to a 60,000-square foot building footprint. For the development of public school sites, the maximum building size does not apply. The Mid-Anchor 3 and future office building depicted on the concept plan both exceed the maximum 30,000 square foot at 40,000+/- and 50,000+/- square feet respectively. The community grocery store is 80,200 square feet (s.f.), which exceeds the 60,000 s.f. limitation by 20,200 s.f. Additional public and quasi-public uses are provided in excess of the minimum 5% commensurate with the increase in building size proposed as shown on the Open Space Plan included in Exhibit A.8. Staff is of the opinion that the additional 5+/- acres of open space provided above the minimum requirements is sufficient to allow the additional square footage of the buildings. • Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks, plazas, outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools that comprise a minimum of 5% of the development area are required. Outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count towards this requirement. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 339 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 13 The concept plan depicts a library, a public plaza in front of the library and market buildings, an esplanade to the north where the live/work units are proposed, a park and open space area with a walking path adjacent to the future residential development, common area adjacent to the multi-story office/residential/retail and other public spaces in accord with this requirement. • Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development above the minimum 5%, the developer may be eligible for additional residential densities and/or an increase to the maximum building footprint. Because the building footprint for the community grocery store exceeds the 60,000 s.f. limitation in the MU-C designated area, additional public and quasi-public uses above the minimum 5% are proposed commensurate with the proposed increase in building size. VIII. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) A. Purpose Statement of Zoning District(s): 1. The purpose of the residential districts is to provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian comprehensive plan. Residential districts are distinguished by the dimensional standards of the corresponding zone and housing types that can be accommodated (UDC 11-2A-1). 2. The purpose of the commercial districts is to provide for the retail and service needs of the community in accordance with the Meridian comprehensive plan. Six (6) districts are designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial structures accommodated in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the location of the district in proximity to streets and highways (UDC 11-2B-1). Allowed uses in the C-C district are larger scale and broader mix of retail, office, and service uses and are usually located with access to arterials or nonresidential collectors. B. Schedule of Use: 1. UDC Table 11-2A-2 lists the principal permitted (P), accessory (A), conditional (C), and prohibited (-) uses in the R-8 zoning district. Any use not explicitly listed is prohibited. Single-family dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 district. 2. UDC Table 11-2B-2 lists the principal permitted (P), accessory (A), conditional (C), and prohibited (-) uses in the C-C zoning district. Any use not explicitly listed is prohibited. Retail, restaurant, professional service (i.e. office), healthcare services, fuel sales facility, civic (i.e. library) and vertically integrated residential projects are all listed as principal permitted uses in the C-C district. C. Dimensional Standards: Development of the site should be consistent with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district; and 11-2B-3 for the C-C zoning district. D. Landscaping: Landscaping is required within street buffers in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. (Landscaping within parking lots is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C but is not required or reviewed with this application.) E. Off-Street Parking: NA (not required or reviewed with the subject application) IX. ANALYSIS Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 340 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 14 A. Annexation & Zoning (AZ): The applicant requests approval to annex & zone 81.51 acres of land from the RUT zoning district in Ada County to the C-C zoning district (63.8 acres) and the R-8 zoning district (17.71 acres) in the City. The proposed zoning is consistent with the FLUM designations of MU-C and MDR for this site. Note: The proposed residential area is approximately 7 acres less than depicted on the FLUM for the MDR designated area. Conceptual Development Plan: The applicant submitted a conceptual development plan that depicts a mix of retail, office, civic and residential uses consisting of (9) commercial pads, (2) restaurant pads, and a fuel station along the periphery of the development adjacent to Chinden and Linder; (4) 2-story live/work (i.e. residential/office) buildings, a library and (2) market buildings along the central north/south entry corridor via Chinden within a plaza; (2) multi-story office/residential/retail buildings along the collector street; (1) anchor (i.e. Winco) and a mid- anchor to the west of the central north/south corridor; (3) mid-anchors to the east of the north/south central corridor; future office/retail development planned at the northeast corner of the site; a park and future single-family residential development on the south side of the collector street; and pedestrian walkways throughout the development providing interconnectivity between the residential and commercial portions of the site. Staff recommends traffic calming (i.e. chokers/bulb-outs, speed humps, etc.) is provided in front of the plaza area in an effort to slow traffic for pedestrian safety. The concept plan accounts for ITD’s CFI/right-of-way needs with a white dashed line at the southeast corner of Linder/Chinden as shown below; however, improvements (i.e. multiple parking spaces and the drive aisle around the front of Building #2) are shown within that area that will be eliminated with construction of the CFI. Landscaping within the street buffer along Chinden is also inaccurately represented on the site plan based on ITD’s TIS Acceptance letter and the STAR agreement that Linder Village/ITD/ACHD are currently working on. The development is required to build the full US 20/26 corridor plan on the south side of Chinden. This means that edge of pavement will be constructed to essentially the first dashed line (see below). Sidewalk, utilities and drainage will reside within the 30 foot easement. The right-in/ right-out approach and the approach at Bergman Way all need to be moved further south to better reflect actual location in relation to the site. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 341 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 15 The arrows on the Bergman Way approach misrepresent the allowed turning movements when constructed. Bergman is limited to unsignalized right-in, right-out, left-in movements. Through movements from north to south on Bergman Way will not be allowed. The concept plan should be revised prior to the City Council hearing to reflect the above- noted discrepancies. The multi-use pathway along Linder Rd. should also be widened to 10 feet and traffic calming in front of the plaza should be added. The truck receiving area for the Winco store is depicted on the west side of the building facing Linder Road with the loading docks facing north toward Chinden Blvd. away from the residential uses to the south and are proposed to be screened by a masonry wall. The future medium density residential development (attached and detached homes) planned on the south side of the collector street will assist in providing a transition to larger single-family residential lots to the south and east in Paramount Subdivision; and the collector street will provide a separation and boundary between the future residential and commercial development. The legal description submitted with the application, included in Exhibit C, shows the boundaries of the property proposed to be annexed and zoned. The property is contiguous to land that has been annexed into the City and is within the Area of City Impact boundary. The City may require a development agreement (DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. To ensure the site develops as proposed and recommended by staff with this application and in accord with the Comprehensive Plan, staff recommends a DA is required with the annexation containing the provisions included in Exhibit B. B. Preliminary Plat (PP): The applicant proposes a preliminary plat consisting of 16 commercial building lots, 1 residential building lot, 2 common lots and 2 other lots for future right-of-way dedication on 78.13 acres of land in the proposed C-C and R-8 zoning districts. The residential lot (Lot 3 on the south side of the collector street) is included in the plat as one large lot and will be developed in the future under a subsequent preliminary plat as will the future office/retail development on the eastern portion of the site depicted as Lots 12 and 13. Note: Block numbers should be included on the plat. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 342 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 16 Phasing Plan: A phasing plan was submitted for the proposed development, included in Exhibit A.6. Staff recommends the following improvements are completed with the first phase: 1) N. Bergman Ave. is extended to the east/west collector street; 2) install the entire 20-foot wide street buffer on both sides of the east/west collector street; and 3) complete the extension of the east/west collector street to N. Fox Run Way. The phasing plan should be revised accordingly. Existing Structures: There are no existing structures on this site. Dimensional Standards: The proposed plat and subsequent development is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-C zoning district and UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district. All of the proposed lots comply with the minimum standards. Note: There is no minimum front, rear or interior side setbacks required in the C-C district; however, required street landscape buffers act as a setback where applicable as building encroachment within buffers is not allowed. Traffic Impact Study (TIS): An updated TIS was submitted to ITD and ACHD for review based on the revised concept site plan for the Phase 1 development area. Staff has not yet received an updated staff report from ACHD. ITD’s letter is included in Exhibit B, Section 12. As part of this development, SH 20-26 will be widened to 5 lanes from N. Linder Rd. to N. Locust Grove Rd. as deemed necessary in the TIS. The TIS does not contain analysis on the future residential and office/retail development area. Prior to any development in that area, a revised TIS will need to be submitted to ITD for review as the land use(s) in these areas may trip the need for a CFI at Linder/Chinden sooner than anticipated. The revised TIS did include this information. Access: Access to streets is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-3 and 11- 3H-4. Access is proposed as follows: (2) accesses are proposed via W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26 – (1) right-in/right-out 1,090+/- feet east of the Linder/Chinden Blvd. intersection and (1) full-access in alignment with Bergman Way on the north side of Chinden; and (3) accesses via N. Linder Rd. – (1) right-in/right-out nearest the Linder Rd./Chinden intersection and (2) full accesses further to the south. The southernmost access via Linder is a collector street that stubs to the east property boundary that will eventually provide access from Linder to N. Fox Run Way and the signal at Chinden/Fox Run; a signal is proposed at the Linder/collector street intersection which is not supported by the Fire Department (see comments Exhibit B, Section 4). Three (3) stub streets (i.e. N. Arliss Ave.; N. Bergman Ave., and W. Director Street) exist at the south and east boundaries of the site to the future residential area that will be extended with development; (2) accesses are proposed from the residential area to the collector street which will provide internal access to the mixed use development from the adjacent residential area without residents having to go out onto Linder and Chinden. The Ada County Highway District (ACHD) has jurisdiction of access via N. Linder Rd.; and the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) has jurisdiction of access via W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20- 26. The UDC (11-3A-3) limits access points to collector and arterial streets to improve safety and ensure motorists can safely enter all streets. The UDC (11-3H-4B.2a) prohibits new approaches directly accessing a state highway (i.e. SH 20-26); the Applicant requests Council approval of a Variance for access to SH 20-26 as proposed. The Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) submitted comments on this application based on the revised concept plan, included in the project file, in regard to access via Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26. The comments state: 1) ITD accepts the right-in/right-out access proposed via SH 20-26 nearest the Linder/SH 20-26 intersection with an eastbound right turn deceleration lane; 2) ITD accepts a right-in/right-out/left-in approach via SH 20-26 with right turn deceleration lanes for eastbound and westbound SH 20-26. If right-of-way cannot be obtained from the adjacent property owner to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 343 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 17 the east (i.e. Brighton Corp.), ITD will assume its original position of allowing a signal at Bergman Way. ITD will allow a future dedicated left-in signal at Bergman Way for southbound turning traffic in association with the future continuous flow intersection (CFI) at Linder Rd. This left-in signal will be a slave to the CFI signal; 3) Improvements are required at the SH 20-26/Fox Run intersection as identified in the TIS; 4) SH 20-26 will be widened to a 5 lane section between Linder and Meridian Roads as proposed in the TIS; 5) Improvements are required at the SH 20- 26/Linder Rd. intersection; and, 6) Improvements are required at the SH 20-26/Meridian Rd. intersection. The Applicant has requested consideration to enter into a STAR agreement with ITD and ACHD to implement the aforementioned improvements along with the additional improvements required by ACHD, which are required to be complete prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy within the proposed development. ITD and ACHD are working with the Applicant to document the terms of the agreement. The Developer is required to meet certain milestone deadlines in order for ITD to move forward with the STAR agreement. Final approval of the proposed accesses via SH 20-26 will be determined once all documentation has been provided and the permit is signed. (See the entire ITD letter at: http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/157968/Page1.aspx. Access is required to be taken from a local street when available per UDC 11-3A-3. There are 3 local streets (i.e. N. Arliss Ave., N. Bergman Ave., and W. Director St.) stubbed to this site; however, the portion of the site that abuts these streets is not being developed with the first phase. In order for adjacent residential neighbors to access the commercial portion of the site without having to go out onto Linder and/or Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26, Staff recommends N. Bergman Ave. is extended to the collector street with the first phase of development. The intent of the UDC (11-3A-3) is to limit access points to arterial and collector streets; a Council waiver is required for the proposed accesses via N. Linder Road and the east/west collector street. The UDC (11-3H-4B.2) prohibits new accesses via SH 20-26 and requires access to a street other than the state highway; the applicant has requested City Council approval of a variance for the (2) accesses proposed via SH 20-26 as depicted on the concept plan. A cross-access/ingress-egress easement and driveway is required to be provided to the property to the south (Parcel #S0425233701, 5960 N. Linder Rd.) in accord with UDC 11- 3A-3A in an effort to decrease access points to the arterial street (i.e. Linder Rd.); the developer should work with that property owner to align the driveway/easement with the backage road proposed on that site and with ACHD to ensure the access is set back a sufficient distance from the Linder/collector street intersection. Cross-access/ingress-egress easements should also be provided between all lots within the subdivision. Landscaping: Street buffer landscaping along N. Linder Rd., W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26 and the east/west collector street is required to be provided with development per UDC Tables 11-2A- 6 and 11-2B-3 in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. A 35-foot wide street buffer is required along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26 and along N. Linder Road, both entryway corridors, and a 20-foot wide buffer is required along the collector street. Staff recommends the entire street buffer and detached pathway/sidewalk along N. Linder Road, W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26 and along both sides of the street east/west collector street is constructed with the first phase of development. Open Space: A minimum of 10% (or 1.77 acres) of the area of the residential portion of the site (17.71 acres) is required to consist of qualified open space in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B. A future preliminary plat for that area should include qualified open space in accord with this requirement. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 344 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 18 Site Amenities: A minimum of one qualified site amenity that meets the requirements listed in UDC 11-3G-3C is required to be provided within the residential portion of this site upon development. The concept site plan depicts a swimming pool and clubhouse as amenities. Pathways: The Pathways Master Plan depicts a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway (Eagle Island) along the frontage of this site on N. Linder Road. The pathway is required to be placed in a 14- foot wide public pedestrian easement. The applicant should coordinate with Kim Warren, Park’s Department Pathways Project Manager (208-888-3579), regarding specifications for the pathway. The UDC (11-3H-4C.4) requires a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway within a public use easement along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26. A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway is also proposed along the east and south perimeter boundaries of the site with internal sidewalks/pathways proposed throughout the development with connections to the multi-use pathways along Linder and Chinden, the sidewalks along the future collector street, to the adjacent properties to the south and east, and to the future development area as shown on the circulation plan included in Exhibit A.3. Staff recommends a sidewalk is provided along the east side of the driveway through Lot 1 to the parcel (#S0425233701, 5960 N. Linder Rd.) to the south for pedestrian interconnectivity. Sidewalks: Sidewalks are required to be provided with development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Detached sidewalks are required along N. Linder Rd., W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26, both arterial streets, and along the east/west collector street. Waterways: The North Slough and the Simpson Lateral cross this site. These waterways will require piping (if not already piped) for development of the site to occur as proposed. Fencing: All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. The proposed plans do not depict fencing on the site. Utilities: Street lights are required to be installed along public streets adjacent to the development in accord with the City’s adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. All development is required to connect to the City water and sewer system unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. Adequate fire protection shall be required in accord with the appropriate fire district standards. Pressurized Irrigation: An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be provided for the development in accord with UDC 11-3A-15 as proposed and will be served by the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation district. Storm Drainage: An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City’s adopted standards, specifications, and ordinances, per UDC 11-3A-18. Hours of Operation: Business hours of operation in the C-C zoning district are limited from 6:00 am to 11:00 pm when the property abuts a residential use or district; extended hours of operation may be requested through a conditional use permit as set forth in UDC 11-2B-3A.4. The grocery store (i.e. Winco) is proposed to operate 24 hours/day. The property as-is without being subdivided, currently abuts residential use and zoning at the south boundary of the site. However, when the property is subdivided as proposed, it will not abut a residential district or use; therefore, hours of operation shouldn’t be restricted. Because this is an annexation, provisions above and beyond UDC standards may be implemented through the development agreement if deemed appropriate by the City Council. Building Elevations: Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the main anchor (Winco), the mid-anchors and the retail shops as shown in Exhibit A.6. Building materials consist primarily of stucco, with smooth and split face CMU, metal panel siding and stone and brick veneer accents. As noted above in Section VII, non-residential buildings should be Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 345 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 19 proportional to and blend in with adjacent residential buildings; future building elevations submitted for design review should demonstrate compliance with this requirement. All structures except single-family detached are required to comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the Architectural Standards Manual. Single-family detached residential structures are exempt from design review. Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC): The applicant is required to submit a CZC application for approval of the proposed use, site layout and building elevations from the Planning Division prior to submittal of a building permit application. Design Review: The applicant is required to submit a Design Review application concurrent with the CZC application for final approval of the site layout and building elevations. The proposed site layout and structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 19 and the Architectural Standards Manual. C. Variance (VAR): The applicant requests a variance to UDC 11-3H-4B.2, which prohibits new approaches directly accessing a state highway (i.e. SH 20/26). The applicant requests approval of (2) accesses via SH 20/26 as shown on the concept site plan included in Exhibit A.2. When a change or increase in intensity of use is proposed, the UDC requires the owner to develop or otherwise acquire access to a street other than the state highway. The use of any existing approaches is required to be abandoned and removed. Public street connections are only allowed at the section line roads; and the half mile mark between section line roads, and shall be collector roads. The letter from ITD included in Exhibit B, Section 12, in regard to the proposed access states ITD accepts the right-in/right-out access proposed via SH 20-26 nearest the Linder/SH 20-26 intersection with an eastbound right turn deceleration lane; and a right-in/right-out/left-in approach via SH 20-26 with right turn deceleration lanes for eastbound and westbound SH 20-26. Final approval of the proposed accesses via SH 20-26 will be determined once all documentation has been provided and the permit is signed. ITD has the authority to grant access from a state highway to a site; the City has the authority to grant access from a site to the state highway. Although ITD may approve the proposed accesses via SH 20-26, approval from the City is still needed and the UDC prohibits access via SH 20-26 unless a variance is approved by City Council. The UDC (11-5B-4) allows requests for a variance for the placement and/or number of access points to state highways. In order to grant a variance, the Council is required to make 3 findings as follows (included in Exhibit D): 1) The variance can’t grant a right or special privilege that isn’t otherwise allowed in the district; 2) The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; and 3) The variance can’t be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. Because staff can’t make all of the required findings listed in Exhibit D, staff is recommending denial of the proposed variance application. In summary, Staff recommends approval of the proposed AZ application with the requirement of a development agreement that includes the provisions listed in Exhibit B; approval of the PP application with the conditions contained in Exhibit B, and denial of the VAR application in accord with the Findings in Exhibit D. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 346 of 736 Linder Village –AZ, PP, VAR H-2017-0088 PAGE 20 X. EXHIBITS A. Drawings/Other 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map 2. Conceptual Development Plan (dated: 10/8/18 12/13/2018) 3. Use Area Plan (dated: 10/8/18) 4. Site Circulation Plan (dated: 10/8/18) 5. Preliminary Plat (dated: 1/4/18) 6. Phasing Plan (dated: 10/25/18) 7. Landscape Plan (dated: 1/4/18) 8. Open Space Plan (dated: 10/8/18 1/14/2019) 9. Proposed Conceptual Building Elevations B. Agency & Department Comments & Conditions C. Legal Description & Exhibit Map for Annexation & Zoning Boundary D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 347 of 736 Exhibit A Page 1 A. Drawings/Other Exhibit A.1: Zoning Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 348 of 736 - 2 - Exhibit A.2: Conceptual Development Plan (dated: 10/8/18 12/13/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 349 of 736 - 3 - Exhibit A.3: Use Area Plan (dated: 10/8/18) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 350 of 736 - 4 - Exhibit A.4: Site Circulation Plan (dated: 10/8/18) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 351 of 736 - 5 - Exhibit A.5: Preliminary Plat (dated: 1/4/18) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 352 of 736 - 6 - Exhibit A.6: Phasing Plan (dated: 10/25/18) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 353 of 736 - 7 - Exhibit A.7: Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 1/4/18) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 354 of 736 - 8 - Exhibit A.8: Open Space Plan (dated: 10/8/18 1/14/2019) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 355 of 736 - 9 - Exhibit A.9: Proposed Conceptual Building Elevations (dated: 9/20/2016 & 1/4/18) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 356 of 736 - 10 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 357 of 736 - 11 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 358 of 736 - 12 - WINCO ELEVATIONS NOT APPROVED (REVISED CONCEPT ELEVATIONS WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 359 of 736 - 13 - B. EXHIBIT B - AGENCY & DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The concept site plan included in Exhibit A.2 shall be revised per Staff’s comments and recommendations in Section IX.A of the staff report prior to the City Council hearing. The Applicant shall work with Brighton, the adjacent property owner to the east, to finalize an agreement for a collector street connection to N. Fox Run Way prior to the City Council meeting. If an agreement can’t be reached, the project shall go back before the Commission for further review. 1.1 A Development Agreement (DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to the annexation ordinance approval, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of $303.00 shall be paid by the applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six (6) months of the City Council granting annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall substantially comply with the concept site plan, use area plan, circulation plan, open space plan, phasing plan, preliminary plat, landscape plan and conceptual building elevations included in Exhibit A and the conditions contained herein. b. Future development shall comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual. c. One building permit is allowed to be issued on the subject property prior to recordation of the subdivision. d. Non-residential buildings should be proportional to and blend in with adjacent future residential buildings in accord with the Comprehensive Plan for mixed use community designated areas. e. Provide an ADA bus stop on the site as proposed; work with Valley Ride Transportation (VRT) to coordinate the details. If VRT determines a bus stop is not needed at this location, the applicant should submit written documentation as such from VRT. f. A minimum of three (3) land use types are required to be provided within this development [i.e. commercial (includes retail, restaurants, etc.), office, residential, civic (includes public open space, parks, entertainment venues, etc.), and industrial]. g. Provide a detached 10-foot wide multi-use pathway (Eagle Island segment) within the street buffer along N. Linder Road in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement for the pathway is required to be submitted to the Planning Division, approved by City Council and recorded. The applicant shall coordinate with Kim Warren, Park’s Department Pathways Project Manager (208-888-3579), regarding specifications for the pathway. If the pathway is covered under ACHD’s pedestrian easement, a separate easement is not required by the City. h. Provide a detached 10-foot wide multi-use pathway within the street buffer along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26 as set forth in UDC 11-3H-4C.4. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement is required to be submitted to the Planning Division, approved by City Council and recorded for the pathway. If the pathway is covered under ACHD’s pedestrian easement, a separate easement is not required by the City. i. All of the existing stub streets (N. Arliss Ave., N. Bergman Ave. and W. Director Street) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 360 of 736 - 14 - shall be extended with this development as originally intended for interconnectivity. Bergman Ave. shall be extended with the first phase of development for interconnectivity between the commercial development and residential neighborhood. j. The street buffer landscaping and 10-foot wide multi-use pathways along the entire frontage of N. Linder Road and SH 20-26/Chinden Blvd. shall be constructed with the first phase of development. k. A minimum gross density of 6 units per acre shall be provided within the future residential development area depicted on the concept site plan. l. The Developer shall complete all improvements required by ITD and ACHD associated with this development within the timeframe required by those agencies in accord with the STARS agreement and consistent the Traffic Impact Study prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy within this development. m. Provide traffic calming (i.e. chokers/bulb-outs, speed humps, etc.) in front of the plaza area in an effort to slow traffic for pedestrian safety. n. At a minimum, a swimming pool and clubhouse shall be provided in the future residential development; 10-foot wide pedestrian pathways shall be provided around the perimeter of the overall development; pedestrian pathways shall be provided internally within the development as depicted on the concept plan; and an entry feature shall be provided at the Linder/SH 20-26 intersection as amenities. o. Prior to any development occurring in the future residential and office/retail area shown on the concept site plan, a revised Traffic Impact Study (TIS) shall be submitted to ITD and ACHD for review. Any new requirements based on the revised TIS shall be considered. The TIS did include analysis on the future development area so a revised TIS is not needed. p. The Applicant shall work with ACHD on the collector street intersection with Linder Rd. where the signal is proposed and the firehouse access is located; and traffic calming measures to slow traffic on Bergman Ave. and W. Bacall St. as allowed by ACHD and the Fire Department. q. Some of the multi-story office live/work spaces south of Winco shall be constructed with the first phase of development. 1.2 Site Specific Conditions – Preliminary Plat 1.2.1 The preliminary plat included in Exhibit A.5, dated 1/4/18, shall be revised as follows: a. Include a note granting a blanket cross-access/ingress-egress easement between all lots within the subdivision. b. Include block numbers on the face of the plat. c. Include a street name for the east/west collector street. d. Revise the plat per the changes required to the concept site plan. 1.2.2 The landscape plan included in Exhibit A.7, dated 1/4/18, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict a sidewalk along the east side of the driveway through Lot 1 to the parcel (#S0425233701, 5960 N. Linder Rd.) to the south for pedestrian interconnectivity. b. Revise the plan per the changes required to the concept site plan. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 361 of 736 - 15 - 1.2.3 The entire street buffer and detached pathway/sidewalk along N. Linder Road, W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26 and both sides of the east/west collector street shall be constructed with the first phase of development. 1.2.4 Provide a cross-access/ingress-egress easement to the property to the south (Parcel #S0425233701, 5960 N. Linder Rd.) in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A; the developer shall work with that property owner to align the driveway/easement with the backage road proposed on that site – submit a copy of the recorded easement to the Planning Division with the final plat application. 1.2.5 North Bergman Ave. shall be extended to the collector street with the first phase of development. 1.2.6 All fencing shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. 1.3 General Conditions of Approval – Preliminary Plat 1.3.1 Comply with all bulk, use, and development standards of the applicable district listed in UDC Chapter 2 District regulations. 1.3.2 Comply with the provisions for irrigation ditches, laterals, canals and/or drainage courses, as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6. 1.3.3 Install lighting consistent with the provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. 1.3.4 Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 15, UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28. 1.3.5 Comply with the sidewalk standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17. 1.3.6 Install all utilities consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-21 and 11-3B-5J. 1.3.7 Construct all off-street parking areas consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5I, 11-3B-8C, and Chapter 3 Article C. 1.3.8 Construct the required landscape buffers consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B- 7C (streets). 1.3.9 Construct storm water integration facilities that meet the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B- 11C. 1.3.10 Protect any existing trees on the subject property that are greater than four-inch caliper and/or mitigate for the loss of such trees as set forth in UDC 11-3B-10. 1.3.11 Provide bicycle parking spaces as set forth in UDC 11-3C-6G consistent with the design standards as set forth in UDC 11-3C-5C. 1.3.12 Comply with the outdoor service and equipment area standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-12. 1.3.13 Construct all required landscape areas used for storm water integration consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-11C. 1.3.14 Comply with the structure and site design standards, as set forth in UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines set forth in the City of Meridian Standards Manual. 1.3.15 Comply with all provisions of UDC 11-3A-3 with regard to maintaining the clear vision triangle. 1.3.16 Low pressure sodium lighting shall be prohibited as an exterior lighting source on the site. 1.3.17 All fencing constructed on the site shall comply with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7 and 11-3A-6B as applicable. 1.4 Ongoing Conditions of Approval – Preliminary Plat Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 362 of 736 - 16 - 1.4.1 The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. 1.5 Process Conditions of Approval – Preliminary Plat 1.5.1 No signs are approved with this application. Prior to installing any signs on the property, the applicant shall submit a sign permit application consistent with the standards in UDC Chapter 3 Article D and receive approval for such signs. 1.5.2 The applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application from the Planning Division, prior to submittal of any building permit application. 2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval 2.1.1 Sanitary sewer mains intended to provide service to the subject site currently exists at the current north terminus of N. Arliss Avenue and N. Bergman Avenue. Applicant shall be responsible for the extension of these mainlines through the project. 2.1.2 Water mains intended to provide service to the subject site currently exist at the current north terminus of N. Arliss Avenue and N. Bergman Avenue, as well as within N. Linder Road, and at the west terminus of W. Director Street. Applicant shall be responsible for the extension of these mainlines through the project. The fire flow at the end of the proposed dead end water main on the east is marginal, and creates a water quality concern. This main shall connect to existing water main on Director St within the road alignment in the Future Residential area, or within the collector roadway extension to Fox Run Way. Each phase of this development will need to be modeled separately to ensure fire flows are adequate. 2.1.3 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat and/or building permit application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272 2.2 General Conditions of Approval 2.2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2.2 Per Meridian City Code (MCC), the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 363 of 736 - 17 - review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 2.2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 2.2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 2.2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 364 of 736 - 18 - 2.2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.2.19 The applicant’s design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.2.20 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-221. 3. POLICE DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/157929/Page1.aspx 4. FIRE DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/157930/Page1.aspx The Fire Department is against the traffic signal in front of station 5. The signal will cause too much congestion with the operations of the engine company trying to leave the station and respond to calls. 5. REPUBLIC SERVICES 5.1 Please coordinate trash enclosure design and locations with Bob Olson, Republic Services (208- 345-1265 office, or 208-371-1745 cell; or, email: ROlson@republicservices.com ) prior to submittal of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. Also, provide provisions for recycling. 6. PARKS DEPARTMENT 6.1 The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation standards listed in UDC 11-3B-10C.5 for any Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 365 of 736 - 19 - existing trees 4-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site. Contact Elroy Huff, City Arborist (208-371-1755), prior to removal of any existing trees from the site. 6.2 The Pathways Master Plan requires a 10-foot wide segment of the City’s multi-use pathway (Eagle Island) along the frontage of this on N. Linder Road; the applicant should coordinate with Kim Warren, Park’s Department (208-888-3579) regarding the requirements for the pathway. The UDC (11-3H-4C.4) also requires a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along SH 20/26. 6.3 Submit a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement for the multi-use pathway along Linder Road and W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26; coordinate the details of the easements with Kim Warren, Pathways Project Manager, 208-888-3579. If the pathways are located within right-of-way, an easement is not required to be submitted to the City. 7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT (ACHD) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/159123/Page1.aspx 8. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink8/DocView.aspx?id=157031 9. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO (COMPASS) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink8/DocView.aspx?id=157483 10. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (DEQ) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/157255/Page1.aspx 11. NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT (NMID) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/157710/Page1.aspx 12. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT (ITD) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/157968/Page1.aspx Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 366 of 736 - 20 - Exhibit C: Legal Description & Exhibit Map for Annexation & Zoning Boundary R-8 Zone Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 367 of 736 - 21 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 368 of 736 - 22 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 369 of 736 - 23 - C-C Zone Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 370 of 736 - 24 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 371 of 736 - 25 - Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 372 of 736 - 26 - D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code 1. ANNEXATION & ZONING FINDINGS: Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation, the Council shall make the following findings: a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; The City Council finds that the proposed map amendment to the C-C and R-8 zoning districts and proposed development plan is consistent with the MU-C and MDR FLUM designations for this site and should be compatible with existing and future uses in the area (see section VII above for more information). b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the pro posed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds that the proposed map amendment to the C-C and R-8 zoning districts is consistent with the purpose statements of the commercial and residential districts as detailed in Section VIII above. c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. City utilities are available to be extended at the expense of the applicant. d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school districts; and, The City Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. e. The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (UDC 11-5B-3.E). The City Council finds the proposed annexation of this property with the proposed development plan is in the best interest of the City. 2. PRELIMINARY PLAT: In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: a. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The City Council finds that the proposed plat is in conformance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use and transportation and circulation goals. b. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services are available to be extended to the subject property upon development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers.) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 373 of 736 - 27 - c. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City’s capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the developer at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. d. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based on comments received from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc.). (See Exhibit B for more detail.) e. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. ACHD and ITD consider road safety issues in their analyses. 3. VARIANCE: The City Council shall apply the standards listed in Idaho Code 67-6516 and all the findings listed in Section 11-5B-4.E of the UDC to review the variance request. In order to grant a variance, the Council shall make the following findings: a. The variance shall not grant a right or special privilege that is not otherwise allowed in the district; City Council finds granting the proposed accesses via Chinden Boulevard would not grant a right or special privilege as the Fred Meyer store across the street to the north was granted access via SH 20-26 as well as the Costco development to the west at the intersection of N. Ten Mile Road and SH 20-26. b. The variance relieves an undue hardship because of characteristics of the site; and City Council finds there are unique characteristics of the site that create an undue hardship that granting a variance would relieve. This site has significant frontage (i.e. 2,675+/- feet) on SH 20-26 which would make sole access via Linder Rd., N. Fox Run Way and N. Bergman Ave. difficult and inefficient and would also create more traffic through the adjacent residential neighborhood. c. The variance shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. City Council finds granting the variance for two (2) accesses via SH 20-26 shouldn’t be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare if the highway is widened to 5 lanes as intended through the STAR’s program and the appropriate improvements to SH 20-26 are constructed as determined by ITD. The City Council also found that under UDC 11-3H-3, even without approval of a Variance for access to SH 20-26, access can be granted upon specific recommendation of the Idaho Transportation Department. Either way, Council approval of the access was found to be appropriate for this development and was approved. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 374 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 Q Project File Number: H-2018-0125 Item Title: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Entrata Farms (H-2018-0125) by FIG Village at Parkside, LLC, Located 3880 and 3882 W. Franklin Rd. Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.Q. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - F indings of F act, C onclusions of L aw for E ntrata F ar ms (H-2018-0125) by F IG Village at P arkside, L L C, Located 3880 and 3882 W. F ranklin Rd. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate F indings Findings/Orders 1/28/2019 E xhibit A E xhibit 1/28/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/28/2019 - 1:33 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 375 of 736 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2018-0125 - 1 - CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Zoning of 19.07 Acres of Land with an R-15 Zoning District; Conditional Use Permit for a Multi-Family Development Consisting of 238 Dwelling Units in the R-15 Zoning District; and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 67 Building Lots and 3 Common Lots on 18.18 Acres of Land in the R-15 Zoning District for Entrata Farms, by FIG Village at Parkside, LLC. Case No(s). H-2018-0125 For the City Council Hearing Date of: January 22, 2019 (Findings on February 5, 2019) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 22, 2019, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 22, 2019, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 22, 2019, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 22, 2019, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the “Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,” codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 376 of 736 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2018-0125 - 2 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 22, 2019, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council’s authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant’s request for Annexation and Zoning, Conditional Use Permit, and Preliminary Plat is hereby approved with the requirement of a Development Agreement per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of January 22, 2019, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer’s signature on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat (UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two (2) years, may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval (UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer’s signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again (UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two (2) years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting, the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two (2) year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1, the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 377 of 736 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2018-0125 - 3 - use not to exceed one (1) two (2) year period. Additional time extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11(UDC 11-5B-6F). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six (6) months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six (6) month approval period. E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of January 22, 2019 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 378 of 736 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of �-Q�b 2019. COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOE BORTON VOTED _h_ COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER TY PALMER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER TREG BERNT VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MIL,AM VOTED MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Ta y Weerd Attest: �QO�pTeu AUovs o r l ECily of IDIAN w C.J Cole <=0 City Clerk SEAL Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: 0 1 WW40" Dated: City Clerk's Office CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FILE NO(S). H-2018-0125 - 4 - Page 1 HEARING DATE: 1/22/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Allen, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2018-0125 Entrata Farms LOCATION: 3880 & 3882 W. Franklin Rd. (N. side of W. Franklin Rd., midway between Ten Mile and Black Cat Roads, in a portion of the south ½ of Section 10, T.3N., R.1W.) I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The following applications were submitted for the proposed development: Annexation and zoning of 19.07 acres of land with an R-15 zoning district; Conditional use permit for a multi-family development consisting of 238 dwelling units on 18.18 acres of land in an R-15 district; Preliminary plat consisting of 67 building lots and 3 common lots on 18.18 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district for Entrata Farms Subdivision; and, Private street II.SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Description Details Page Acreage 18.18 Future Land Use Designation HDR (high density residential) Existing Land Use Rural residential/agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) MFR (multi-family residential development) Current Zoning RUT in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-15 Lots (# and type; bldg/common) 70 total lots; 67 building lots/3 common lots Phasing plan (# of phases) 2 EXHIBIT A Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 380 of 736 Page 2 Number of Residential Units (type of units) 238 (multi-family dwellings); varying designs of townhome style units Density (gross & net) 13.09/14.07 Open Space (acres, total [%] / buffer / qualified) 6.15 acres (33.8%) consisting of ½ the street buffer along Franklin Rd., an arterial street; and common area within site Amenities See Section V for complete information 8 Physical Features (waterways, hazards, flood plain, hillside) The Kennedy Lateral runs along the east boundary; and the Purdam Drain runs along the southwest corner of the site. Neighborhood meeting date; # of attendees: 10/12/18; 1 attendee (the Applicant) History (previous approvals) H-2018-0032 (denied) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 381 of 736 Page 3 B. Community Metrics Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 382 of 736 Page 4 Description Details Page Ada County Highway District  Staff report (yes/no) Yes  Requires ACHD Commission Action (yes/no) No Access (Arterial/Collectors/State Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) (1) Full access and (1) emergency access via W. Franklin Rd., an arterial street; (1) access via W. Perugia St., a local street Traffic Level of Service Better than “E” which is an acceptable level of service Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross Access W. Perugia St. stubs at the west boundary; an emergency access is proposed at the west boundary from private street “K” north of Perugia Existing Road Network The entry street, N. Entrata Way, and W. Perugia St. are public streets; all other internal streets are private Existing Arterial Sidewalks / Buffers A sidewalk exists along W. Franklin Rd.; there are no existing buffers Proposed Road Improvements Fire Service  Distance to Fire Station 2.8 miles (Fire Station #2)  Fire Response Time 5 minutes (under ideal conditions)  Resource Reliability 80% (does not meet target goal of 85% or greater)  Risk Identification 1=residential  Accessibility Project meets all required road widths and turnarounds. Parking is always a concern.  Special/resource needs Project will not require an aerial device.  Water Supply 1500 gal./minute for 2 hours required Police Service  Distance to Police Station 4 miles  Police Response Time 6 minutes  Calls for Service Between 11/1/17-10/31/18 PD responded to 464 calls for service within a mile of the proposed development.  % of calls for service split by priority See PD comments in Section VIII. D  Accessibility No issues  Specialty/resource needs None  Crimes 161  Crashes 20  Other Reports The PD already serves this area; the applicant has addressed all concerns and there are no outstanding issues for PD Wastewater  Distance to Sewer Services 0 Feet  Sewer Shed N/A - still determining the sewer shed names  Estimated Project Sewer ERU’s 238  WRRF Declining Balance 13.57 MGD - as of 12/14/18, it was less at the time this application was submitted  Project Consistent with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan Yes Water  Distance to Water Services 0 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 383 of 736 Page 5 C. Project Area Maps  Pressure Zone 2  Estimated Project Water ERU’s See application information  Water Quality Concerns None  Project Consistent with Water Master Plan YEs  Impacts/Concerns See Site Specific Conditions of Approval Grocery Store 1.3 miles away (Albertson’s) COMPASS (Communities in Motion 2040 2.0) See Section VIII.H Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 384 of 736 Page 6 III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: FIG Village at Parkside, LLC – 295 W. Center St., Ste. 201, Provo, UT 84601 B. Owners: 2FP LLC – 1002 N. Happy Valley Rd., Nampa, ID 83689 Mathew LeBaron – 1214 2nd St. S., Nampa, ID 83651 C. Representative: Kent Brown, Kent Brown Planning – 3161 E. Springwood Dr., Meridian, ID 83642 IV. NOTICING Planning & Zoning Posting Date City Council Posting Date Legal notice published in newspaper 10/30/2018 1/4/2019 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 11/27/2018 1/7/2019 Nextdoor posting 11/27/2018 1/7/2019 Public hearing notice sign posted on property 12/9/2018 1/12/2019 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Comprehensive Plan (Comprehensive Plan); Specific Area Plan (TMISAP pg. 3-7) TEN INTERCHANGE SPECIFIC AREA PLAN (TMISAP) The subject property is located in the area governed by the TMISAP which focuses on developing an area that has an identity of its own but which links to nearby developments. The plan emphasizes the community’s support for higher densities and mixed uses to create a vibrant and e conomically strong city. The plan also stresses the community’s commitment to good site planning and design as a means of establishing a place everyone can be proud of and one that protects the interests of future businesses and residents. LAND USE: HDR (High Density Residential) – HDR designated areas in the Ten Mile Area are multiple-family housing areas where relatively larger and taller apartment buildings are the recommended building type. A mix of housing types should be included that achieve an overall average density target of at least 16-25 dwelling units per acre with a range of 15 to 40 units per acre. Most developments should fall within or below this range, although smaller areas of higher or lower density may be included. The design and orientation of new high density residential buildings should be pedestrian- oriented, and special streetscape improvements should be considered to create rich and enjoyable public spaces. The Applicant requests Council approval of a “step” down in density from HDR (15+ units/acre) to MHDR (medium high density residential) (8-15 units/acre). The reason for the request is due to Council’s denial of the previous application for this site, which had a gross density of 15.3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 385 of 736 Page 7 units/acre. The Applicant has redesigned the site in accord with the concerns noted by the Council at the previous hearing (see Applicant’s narrative for more information). MHDR (Medium High-Density Residential): MHDR designated areas allow for the development of a mix of relatively dense residential housing types including townhomes, condominiums and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from 8 to 15 dwelling units per acre, with a target density of 12 units per acre. These are relatively compact areas within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and individual project identity. The proposed development is relatively dense and includes townhome style apartments at a gross density of 13.09 units/acre. The FLUM depicts mixed use commercial and employment areas 1/3+ mile to the south and east, yet to be developed, within walking distance from the site. The design of the proposed structures appear to be of high quality and ultimately are required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual and the design guidelines in the TMISAP (see pgs. 3-31 thru 3-51). The proposed MHDR designation on this site is consistent with that to the east and west of the same designation. Pathways are proposed throughout the development for connectivity internally as well as with adjacent uses and area pathways. TRANSPORTATION: A local street is designated on the Future Land Use Map in the TMISAP across this property from the east to W. Franklin Rd. No collector streets are designated on this property although W. Perugia St. will provide an east/west connection between properties north of W. Franklin Rd. and will function much like a collector. Perugia connects to N. Umbria Hills Ave. to the east, which connects to W. Franklin Rd., and will provide access to a future traffic signal. A collector street was formerly designated across this site on the Transportation System Map but was recently removed. The proposed site design meets the transportation objectives of the Plan. DESIGN: Development within the Ten Mile Area should incorporate the following design characteristics: The proposed site design is compatible with the multi-family development to the east; and should be compatible with future medium high density residential uses to the west when that property Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 386 of 736 Page 8 redevelops at some point in the future. Buildings are brought up to the street buffer along Franklin Rd. for a uniform street presence with primary building facades facing the street. Six- plex structures, 2-stories in height on the ends with 3-stories in the middle, are proposed along Franklin Rd. that provides appropriate transition, architectural interest, massing and scale within the Ten Mile area. Pedestrian walkways are planned throughout the development to provide for pedestrian interconnectivity within the development as well as with adjacent developments and the Ten Mile area. For these reasons, Staff finds the proposed development is consistent with the design characteristics of the Ten Mile Area envisioned in the TMISAP. B. Comprehensive Plan Policies (https://www.meridiancity.org/compplan): The proposed development demonstrates compliance with the following policies of the Plan:  “Provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes and multi-family arrangements) and choices between ownership and rental dwelling units for all income groups in a variety of locations suitable for residential development.” (3.07.03B)  “Support a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, medium-high and high-density single-family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities.” (3.07.01E)  “Require all new and reconstructed parking lots to provide landscaping in internal islands and along streets.” (2.01.04B)  “Provide housing options close to employment and shopping centers.” (3.07.02D)  “Require open space areas within all development.” (6.01.01A)  “Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City.” (3.01.01F)  “Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets.” (3.06.02D)  “Locate high-density development, where possible, near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, Old Town, and near major access thoroughfares.” (3.07.02, pg. 55)  “Protect existing residential properties from incompatible land use development on adjacent parcels.” (3.06.01F)  “Work with ACHD, COMPASS, and VRT on bringing public transportation to and through Meridian.” (3.03.04H)  “Require pedestrian access connectors in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood connectivity as part of a community pathway system.” (3.03.03B)  “Work with transportation agencies and private property owners to preserve transportation corridors, future transit routes and infrastructure, road and highway extensions, and to facilitate access management planning.” (3.01.01J)  “Develop alternative modes of transportation through pedestrian improvements, bicycle lanes, off-street pathways, and transit-oriented development as appropriate.” (3.03.03D) C. Annexation Area: The proposed annexation area is contiguous to City annexed property to the east, south and north and is within the Area of City Impact Boundary. A legal description for the annexation area is included in Section VII.A. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 387 of 736 Page 9 The City may require a development agreement (DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section VIII. D. Site Plan: A site plan was submitted with the conditional use permit application that depicts how the site is proposed to develop with a multi-family development (see Section VII.B). A combination of 2- and 3-story townhome style multi-family structures are proposed in groups of 4, 6 and 8 attached units, both front and rear loaded. Two-story units are proposed along the west boundary of the site adjacent to the existing residential/agricultural property [see Delinda 4-plex and 8-plex and Tucker 6-plex elevations (end units) in Section VII.F]; a combination of 2- and 3-story units (i.e. 2-story on the ends with 3- stories in the middle) are proposed along Franklin Rd. (see Tucker 6-plex elevations in Section VII.F); and 3- story structures are proposed internally (see Payton 6-plex and 8-plex elevations in Section VII.F). E. Preliminary Plat: Note: A previous preliminary plat (H-2018-0032) for this site was denied by City Council on July 10, 2018. The UDC (11-5A-3) states that no application that has been denied by the Council shall be resubmitted in substantially the same form for the same use within one year from the date of denial. Because the overall layout and design of the proposed plat has changed substantially from the previous plat and the number of units has been reduced by 40, Staff deemed the proposed plat to be substantially different from that previously denied. The proposed plat consists of 67 building lots and 3 common lots on 18.18 acres of land in the proposed R-15 district. The subdivision is proposed to develop in two (2) phases with the front portion of the site developing with the first phase. See Section VII.C. Compliance with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3 is required. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and determined it is in compliance with those standards. F. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing home and accessory structures on this site that will be removed with development. G. Proposed Zoning/Use Analysis: The proposed R-15 zoning district for the site is consistent with the requested MHDR FLUM designation HDR FLUM designation Multi-family developments are listed as a conditional use in the R-15 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. H. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): The proposed use is subject to the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27, Multi-Family Development as follows:  A minimum of 80 square feet (s.f.) of private useable open space is required to be provided for each unit. Private patios are proposed for each unit that meets this requirement.  Development with 20 units or more are required to provide a property management office, maintenance storage area, central mailbox location (including provisions for parcel mail) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 388 of 736 Page 10 that provides safe pedestrian and/or vehicular access, and a directory and map of the development at an entrance or convenient location for those entering the development. The property management and maintenance storage area is proposed to be located within the clubhouse; the mailboxes will be located near the clubhouse as well but are not depicted on the site plan. The site plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application should depict the location(s) of each of these items.  At a minimum, 250 square feet (s.f.) of outdoor common open space is required for each unit containing more than 500 and up to 1,200 s.f. of living area. All of the proposed units are within this range. Therefore, a minimum of 59,500 s.f. (or 1.37 of an acre) of common open space is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27C. The outdoor common area proposed within this development complies with this standard.  For multi-family developments with 75 units or more, (4) amenities are required to be provided with at least one from each category (i.e. quality of life, open space and recreation). For more than 100 units, the decision making body shall require additional amenities commensurate to the size of the proposed development. The following amenities are proposed:  Outdoor pool complex with clubhouse/restroom facilities/property management office – Recreation Category  Play Structure – Step-By-Step item 350-1802 – Recreation Category  Play Structure – Step-By-Step Item 350-1737 – Recreation Category  Dual Slope Pavilion w/ BBQ Stations & picnic tables – 16’ x 20’ DS16X20M – Quality of Life Category  20’x20’ Pavilion – Sail Shade SRP Sail Shade 0120840 Dual Sail w/ BBQ Stations & picnic tables – Quality of Life Category  Dog Park - SRP Pawsitively Playful Dog Park Item No. RECF0019XX – Quality of Life Category  ½ Basketball Court - Model #1590 – 6” Square Adjustable Basketball System – Recreation Category  Open grassy play field with minimum 100’x50’ – Open Space Category  Open grassy play field with minimum 100’x50’ – Open Space Category  Pathways – micros paths provided throughout the site – Quality of Life Category  Misc – Park Benches, Bike Racks, Picnic Tables & Trash Receptacles (see details in Section VII.E). Staff finds the proposed amenities provided from each of the required categories are commensurate with the 238 unit development proposed.  Landscaping is required to comply with UDC 11-4-3-27E. All street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundations as follows: the landscaped area shall be at least 3-feet wide and have an evergreen shrub with a minimum mature height of 24 inches for every 3 linear feet of foundation. The remainder of the area shall be landscaped with ground cover plans. The detail of the landscaping proposed along the foundations of each structure shown on Sheet L3.1 in Section VII.D complies with this standard.  The development is required to record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including, but not limited to, structures, parking, common areas, and other development features. The applicant shall submit documentation of compliance with this requirement with submittal of the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 389 of 736 Page 11 I. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2A-7): Development is required to comply with the dimesnional standards listed below for the R-15 district. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and found all of the proposed lots comply with the minimum property size requirement. Future structures should comply with the minimum setback standards. Zero lot lines should be depicted on the plat where buildings span across lot lines. To ensure setback requirements for the R-15 zoning and the specific use standard in UDC 11-4-3-27B.1 are met, staff recommends the final plat for this development is recorded prior to submittal of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance applications. J. Access (UDC 11-3A-3)/Transportation: One full access and one emergency access is proposed via W. Franklin Rd., an arterial street. West Perugia St., a local street, is proposed to be extended from the east boundary through the site and stub to the west boundary for future extension; this will necessitate construction of a bridge/culvert over the Kennedy Lateral. An emergency access is proposed to the property to the west near the north boundary from Street K. Private streets are proposed for access internally within the development and for addressing purposes. The proposed access complies with UDC 11-3A-3 and the Comprehensive Plan (3.06.02D referenced above) which restricts access to arterial streets. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 390 of 736 Page 12 Franklin Rd. was recently widened from Ten Mile to Black Cat Roads and improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk; therefore, there are no major road improvements required with this development. K. Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4) Private streets are required to comply with the design and construction standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4, including but not limited to the following:  Private streets are required to be constructed on a perpetual ingress/egress easement or a single-platted lot that provides access to all properties served by such private street; preferably a lot when the property is being subdivided as is the case with this application.  All drive aisles are required to be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed. In addition, if a curb exists next to the drive aisle, it shall be painted red.  All travel lanes should have a minimum width of 26 feet. The proposed private streets are 26 feet in width as shown on the private road section shown on Sheet 4 of the preliminary plat site plan in Section VII.B. Compliance with the other standards listed above is required; the plat should be revised to include the private streets within common lots. L. Transit: The applicant’s narrative states they have coordinated with Valley Regional Transit to locate a commuter ride pad near the southwest corner of the site along the W. Franklin Rd. in accord with the Comprehensive Plan (action items #3.01.01J and #3.03.03D referenced above). M. Parking (UDC Table 11-3C-6): Off-street vehicle parking is required to be provided for 2- and 3-bedroom multi-family dwellings as follows: 2 spaces per dwelling unit; at least 1 in a covered carport or garage. Based on (238) 2- and 3-bedroom units, a minimum of (476) spaces are required with 238 of those in a covered carport or garage. A total of 603 spaces are proposed consisting of 274 driveway spaces, 254 garage spaces and 75 guest parking spaces for a total of 127 spaces over the minimum required in accord with UDC standards. Bicycle parking is required to be provided based on 1 space for every 25 vehicle spaces provided on the site. Based on a total of 603 vehicle spaces, a minimum of 24 bicycle parking spaces are required. A total of 36 bicycle spaces are proposed in excess of UDC standards. N. Pathways (UDC 11-3A-8, 11-3B-12C): Pedestrian pathways are proposed throughout the development for internal connectivity and connectivity with adjacent developments in accord with UDC standards and the Comprehensive Plan (action item #3.03.03B referenced above). Landscaping is required to be provided adjacent to all pathways as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C. O. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): Sidewalks are required to be provided with development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. A sidewalk was recently constructed along W. Franklin Rd., an arterial street with the road widening project by ACHD. A 5-foot wide attached sidewalk is proposed to be constructed along W. Perugia St. and N. Entrata Way, both local streets, in accord with UDC standards. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 391 of 736 Page 13 P. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): A minimum 25-foot wide street buffer is required to be provided along W. Franklin Rd., an arterial street, as set forth in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district; landscaping is required within the buffers in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Said buffer is required to be maintained by a homeowner’s association. A larger buffer ranging in width from 28 to 38 feet is proposed to provide more separation between the development and the large power transmission lines along Franklin Rd. The proposed landscaping complies with UDC standards. There are a total of 113-caliper inches of existing trees on this site being removed that require mitigation; a total of 57 trees at 2” caliper each are proposed for mitigation in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-10C.5. Q. Qualified Open Space (UDC 11-3G-3): The UDC requires a minimum of 10% qualified open space to be provided within the development as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3. The specific use standards for multi-family developments listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 also require qualified open space in addition to this requirement (see analysis above). An open space exhibit was submitted, included in Section VII.E that depicts a total of 6.15 acres (or 33.8%). The proposed qualified open space consists of (2) open grassy areas greater than 50’ x 100’ in area, half of the street buffer along Franklin Rd., and a stormwater detention facility in accord with UDC standards. R. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3G-3): The UDC (11-3G-3) requires a minimum of (1) qualified site amenity to be provided for each 20 acres of development area as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3. Based on 18.18 acres of development area, a minimum of (1) qualified site amenity is required to be provided to satisfy this requirement. The specific use standards for multi-family developments listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 also require site amenities in addition to this requirement (see analysis above). The site amenities described above in #V.H meet this requirement. S. Maintenance: The applicant proposes to have one management company to handle the leasing and maintenance of the entire project to ensure a better overall management of the development. Because this was a previous concern of Council, Staff recommends a provision requiring this is included in the DA. T. Waterways (UDC 11-3A-6): The Kennedy Lateral runs along the east boundary of this site; City Council waived the requirement for the lateral to be piped due to its large capacity with the final plat for Umbria Subdivision, the development to the east (FP-06-011). The Purdam Drain runs across the southwest corner of the site; the Applicant requests Council approval of a waiver to allow the drain to remain open and not be piped due to its capacity and location which is not entirely on this property. A retaining wall is proposed adjacent to the drain in order to preserve public safety; however, the UDC does not allow solid fences adjacent to waterways. Therefore, the retaining wall should be replaced with a fence that meets the standards in UDC 11-3A-6C as described below. Other irrigation ditches cross this site that are proposed to be piped in accord with UDC standards. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 392 of 736 Page 14 U. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All new fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7; fencing along waterways is required to comply with UDC 11-3A-6. A 6-foot tall vinyl privacy fence is proposed along the west boundary of the site; a retaining wall is proposed along the east side of the Purdam Drain and will not be higher than the ground surface on the development side – a fence will be placed on top of the wall to preserve public safety; and a rail fence is depicted along the east boundary adjacent to the Kennedy Lateral. The UDC (11-3A-6) does not allow a solid fence (i.e. a retaining wall) to be constructed along waterways; therefore, the retaining wall depicted along the Purdam drain shall be replaced with requires an open vision fence at least 6 feet in height and having an 11-guage, 2-inch mesh or other construction, equivalent in ability to deter access to said drain as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6C. The rail fence proposed along the Kennedy Lateral will not preserve public safety with the lateral remaining open; therefore, it should be replaced with a fence that complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and described above. V. Utilities (UDC 11-3A-21): All development is required to connect to the City water and sewer system unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. City water and sewer services are stubbed to this site. W. Pressure Irrigation (UDC 11-3A-15): An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be provided for the development in accord with UDC 11-3A-15 as proposed. X. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments; design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. Storm drainage facilities counted toward qualified open space are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-11C. Y. Building Elevations (UDC 11-3A-19 | Architectural Standards Manual): Building elevations were submitted with the CUP application that include 3 different styles (i.e. Delinda 4-plex and 8-plex, Payton 6-plex and 8-plex, and Tucker 6-plex) of multi-family structures 2- and 3-stories in height (see Section VII.F). All of the units are a townhome design with garages on the first floor and living areas above. All structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual and with the guidelines in the TMISAP. Z. Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC)/Design Review (DR): An application for a CZC and DR is required to be submitted for review and approval of the site design and structures proposed within the development to ensure consistency with UDC standards, design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual, the TMISAP, and provisions in this report prior to submittal of building permit applications for the development. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 393 of 736 Page 15 VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff finds the proposed development is premiere in that it provides open space, site amenities and parking far exceeding UDC standards; provides a housing type (i.e. townhome style multi- family units) that will contribute to the variety of housing types in this area (atypical to the usual garden style apartments); will provide much needed housing within the Ten Mile area in close proximity to future shopping and employment uses; and is consistent with the TMISAP. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the Applicant’s request for annexation and zoning, conditional use permit, preliminary plat and private streets contingent upon Council’s approval of the requested “step” down in density from HDR to MHDR. Council should also consider the Applicant’s request for a waiver to leave the Purdam Drain open and not require it to be piped. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on December 20, 2018. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ, CUP and PP requests. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Kent Brown, Applicant’s Representative; ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: None iv. Written testimony: James Doolin, Applicant (in agreement with the staff report) v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: i. In favor of the single maintenance and management company for the overall development as proposed by the Applicant; ii. Walkable distance of the site to future employment uses within the Ten Mile area; iii. In favor of the design of the proposed structures, parking underneath the structures and incorporation of mews within the development; iv. Concern pertaining to timing for this property to develop in conjunction with other nearby multi-family developments and their overall impact on public services. d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. None e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. The Applicant is requesting Council approval of a “step” down in density from HDR to MHDR. ii. The Applicant is requesting Council approval of a waiver to UDC 11-3A6 to leave the Purdam Drain open and not pipe it due to its large capacity and it’s not located entirely on the subject property. C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on January 22, 2019. At the public hearing, the Council approved the subject AZ, CUP and PP requests. a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing: i. In favor: Kent Brown; James Doolin, FIG Development ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Harlin Baldwin iv. Written testimony: None Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 394 of 736 Page 16 v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. Concern pertaining to the continued provision of irrigation water to downstream users; c. Key Issues of Discussion by Council: i. In favor of the proposed re-design and open space and amenity package; ii. Type of fencing proposed along the Kennedy Lateral and Purdam Drain; d. Key Council Changes to Commission Recommendation i. Council approved the Applicant’s request for a “step” down in density from HDR to MHDR; ii. Council approved the Applicant’s request for a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6 to leave the Purdam Drain open and not tile the facility due to its large capacity and because the drain is not entirely located on this site (see condition #1.1c); iii. Council required wrought iron fencing to be constructed adjacent to the Kennedy Lateral and the Purdam Drain as offered by the Applicant (see site specific condition #2.1.2a). Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 395 of 736 Page 17 VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation & Zoning Legal Description and Exhibit Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 396 of 736 Page 18 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 397 of 736 Page 19 B. Site Plan (date: 10/16/18) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 398 of 736 Page 20 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 399 of 736 Page 21 C. Preliminary Plat (date: 10/16/18) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 400 of 736 Page 22 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 401 of 736 Page 23 D. Landscape Plan (date: 10/16/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 402 of 736 Page 24 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 403 of 736 Page 25 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 404 of 736 Page 26 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 405 of 736 Page 27 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 406 of 736 Page 28 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 407 of 736 Page 29 E. Qualified Open Space Exhibit (date: 10/9/2018) & Site Amenities Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 408 of 736 Page 30 Amenities: (Revised)  Outdoor pool complex with clubhouse/restroom facilities/property management office – Recreation Category  Play Structure – Step-By-Step item 350-1802 – Recreation Category  Play Structure – Step-By-Step Item 350-1737 – Recreation Category  Dual Slope Pavilion w/ BBQ Stations & picnic tables – 16’ x 20’ DS16X20M – Quality of Life Category  20’x20’ Pavilion – Sail Shade SRP Sail Shade 0120840 Dual Sail w/ BBQ Stations & picnic tables – Quality of Life Category  Dog Park - SRP Pawsitively Playful Dog Park Item No. RECF0019XX – Quality of Life Category  ½ Basketball Court - Model #1590 – 6” Square Adjustable Basketball System – Recreation Category  Open grassy play field with minimum 100’x50’ – Open Space Category  Open grassy play field with minimum 100’x50’ – Open Space Category  Pathways – micros paths provided throughout the site – Quality of Life Category  Misc – Park Benches, Bike Racks, Picnic Tables & Trash Receptacles Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 409 of 736 Page 31 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 410 of 736 Page 32 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 411 of 736 Page 33 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 412 of 736 Page 34 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 413 of 736 Page 35 F. Building Elevations (date: 10/23/2018) DELINDA 4-PLEX Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 414 of 736 Page 36 DELINDA 8-PLEX Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 415 of 736 Page 37 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 416 of 736 Page 38 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 417 of 736 Page 39 PAYTON 6-PLEX Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 418 of 736 Page 40 PAYTON 8-PLEX Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 419 of 736 Page 41 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 420 of 736 Page 42 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 421 of 736 Page 43 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 422 of 736 Page 44 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 423 of 736 Page 45 TUCKER 6-PLEX Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 424 of 736 Page 46 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 425 of 736 Page 47 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 426 of 736 Page 48 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 427 of 736 Page 49 G. Private Street and Unit Layout Exhibit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 428 of 736 Page 50 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING 1. Annexation & Zoning 1.1 A Development Agreement (DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of $303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six (6) months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, site plan, landscape plan, open space exhibit, building elevations/floor plans included in Section VII, and the provisions contained herein. b. The Kennedy Lateral was previously approved by City Council with the final plat for Umbria Subdivision (FP-06-011), the development to the east, to remain open and not be piped due to its large capacity. c. The City Council approved a waiver to UDC 11-3A-6B to allow the Purdam Drain shall be piped as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B unless otherwise waived by City Council. The Applicant requests a waiver for the drain to remain open due to its capacity and location which is not entirely on this site to remain open and not be piped or otherwise covered due to its large capacity and due to it not being located entirely on this site. d. Site amenities and open space shall be provided within the development in accord with the qualified open space exhibit in Section VII.E and amenities shown on the site plan in Section VII.B in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3 and 11-4-3-27C, D. e. The applicant shall have one management company handle the leasing and maintenance of the entire project to ensure better overall consistent management of the development. 2. Conditional Use Permit 2.1 Site Specific Conditions 2.1.1 The Applicant shall comply with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 for multi- family developments. 2.1.2 The site/landscape plan included in Section VII shall be revised as follows: a. The retaining wall depicted along the Purdam drain and the rail fence depicted along the Kennedy Lateral shall be replaced with an open vision fence a wrought iron fence at least 6 feet in height and having an 11-guage, 2-inch mesh or other construction, equivalent in ability to deter access to said drain/lateral as set forth in accord with UDC 11-3A-6C; the same type of fencing is required along the east side of the Purdam Drain if Council approves a waiver for the waterway to remain open and not be piped. b. Depict the location of the property management office, maintenance storage area, central mailbox location (including provisions for parcel mail) that provides safe pedestrian and/or vehicular access, and directory and map of the development at an entrance or convenient location for those entering the development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-4- 3-27. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 429 of 736 Page 51 c. Depict minimum 80 square foot patios for each unit in accord with UDC 11-4-3-27B.3. d. All storm drainage facilities shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-11C. 2.1.3 All drive aisles are required to be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed; if a curb exists next to the drive aisle, it shall be painted red as set forth in UDC 11-3F-4B.2d. 2.1.4 The development is required to record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including, but not limited to, structures, parking, common areas, and other development features as set forth in UDC 11-4-3- 27F. A recorded copy of this agreement shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. 2.1.5 All structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual and with the guidelines in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (pgs. 3- 31 thru 3-51). 2.1.6 The conditional use permit shall be valid for a maximum period of two (2) years unless otherwise approved by the city. During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. 2.1.7 An application for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review is required to be submitted for review and approval of the site design and structures proposed within the development to ensure consistency with Unified Development Code standards, design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual, the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan, and provisions in this report prior to submittal of building permit applications for the development. 2.1.8 Development shall comply with the private street and unit layout exhibit in Section VII.G. 3. Preliminary Plat 3.1 The preliminary plat included in Section VII.C shall be revised as follows: a. All private streets shall be depicted on a single platted lot that provides access to all properties served by such private streets in accord with UDC 11-3F-4. 3.2 To ensure dimensional standards and setback requirements for the R-15 zoning district and the specific use standard in UDC 11-4-3-27B.1, as well as Building Code separation requirements are met, staff recommends the final plat for this development is recorded prior to submittal of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance applications. 3.3 All private streets shall be constructed in accord with the design and construction standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4A, B. 3.4 Approval of the preliminary plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two (2) years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat; or, submit and obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7. B. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 In order to ensure connectivity, and service to future development, provide water connections at two locations to the west. One at proposed Perugia Street, and one at or north of Street I. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 430 of 736 Page 52 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code (MCC), the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6, except for the Purdam Drain and the Kennedy Lateral which the Council approved to be left open. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 431 of 736 Page 53 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 432 of 736 Page 54 Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/158714/Page1.aspx D. POLICE DEPARTMENT http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/159430/Page1.aspx E. NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT (NMID) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/159022/Page1.aspx F. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT (CDHD) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/158766/Page1.aspx G. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT QUALITY (DEQ) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/158651/Page1.aspx H. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO (COMPASS) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/158560/Page1.aspx I. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT (ACHD) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/159258/Page1.aspx IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone (UDC 11-5B-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission, the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the Applicant’s proposal to annex the subject 19.07 acre property with an R-15 zoning district and develop 238 new multi-family units consisting of townhome style apartments at a gross density of 13.09 units per acre is below the density desired in HDR designated areas but appropriate for the step down in density to MHDR as requested and approved with this application. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds that the proposed map amendment to the R-15 zoning district is consistent with the purpose statement for the residential districts in UDC 11-2A-1. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 433 of 736 Page 55 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds that the proposed zoning map amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. City utilities will be extended at the expense of the applicant. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including, but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. 5. The annexation (as applicable) is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds annexing this property with an R-15 zoning district is in the best interest of the City if the applicant develops the site in accord with the proposed site plan. B. Preliminary Plat (UDC 11-6B-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision making body shall make the following findings: (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15- 2005) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord. 08-1372, 7-8-2008, eff. 7-8-2008) The City Council finds that the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use, transportation, and circulation. Please see Comprehensive Plan analysis in Section V of the Staff Report for more information. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to the subject property upon development. (See Section VIII of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers.) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the developer at their own cost, the City Council finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based on comments received from public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc.). (See Exhibit B for more detail.) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 434 of 736 Page 56 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. (Ord. 05-1170, 8- 30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that exist on this site. C. Conditional Use Permit (UDC 11-5B-6) Required Findings: The commission shall base its determination on the conditional use permit request upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. The City Council finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and the dimensional & development regulations of the R-15 district (see Analysis Section V for more information). 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian comprehensive plan and in accord with the requirements of this title. The City Council finds that the proposed use is consistent and harmonious with the UDC and the requested step down in density to MHDR in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. The City Council finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the proposed use should be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing and intended character of the area. 4. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. The City Council finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the proposed use will not adversely affect other property in the area. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. The City Council finds that sanitary sewer, domestic water, refuse disposal, and irrigation are currently available to the subject property and the proposed use will be served adequately by the public facilities and services listed above based on their comments in Section VIII. Comments were not received from the school district. 6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. If approved, the applicant will be financing any improvements required for development. The City Council finds there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost and that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the community’s economic welfare. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 435 of 736 Page 57 7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. The City Council finds the proposed use will not be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare of the area. 8. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15- 2005) The City Council finds that there should not be any health, safety or environmental problems associated with the proposed use. Further, the City Council finds that the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. D. Private Street (UDC 11-3F-5) Required Findings: In order to approve the application, the director shall find the following: 1. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this article; The Director finds the proposed design of the private streets meets the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. 2. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage, hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons, property, or uses in the vicinity; and The Director finds granting approval of the proposed private streets will not cause damage, hazard, or nuisance or other detriment as described above. 3. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the comprehensive plan and/or the regional transportation plan. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005) The Director finds the proposed use and locations of private streets will not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or regional transportation plan. 4. The proposed residential development (if applicable) is a mew or gated development. (Ord. 10-1463, 11-3-2010, eff. 11-8-2010) The Director finds the proposed residential development incorporates mews in the design. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 436 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 R Project File Number: Item Title: Irrigation Crossing License Agreement with Settlers Irrigation District at the Coleman Lateral for the ACHD Linder Rd. — Ustick to McMillan Utility Improvements Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.R. Presenter: Consent Estimated Time f or P resentation: Consent Title of I tem - Irrigation Crossing L icense Agreement with Settlers Irrigation D istrict at the C oleman L ateral for the AC HD L inder Rd. – Ustick to M cM illan Utility Improvements T his is an agreement between the City and S ettlers I rrigation District to build a portion of water main and sewer main underneath the C oleman L ateral as part of the L inder R d. – Ustick to McMillan Utility I mprovements Project. This project will be constructed from a point just north of the intersection of Ustick Road and L inder Road to a point just south of the intersection of Mc Millan Road and L inder R oad. T he project includes approximately 142 lineal f eet of 12-inch water main adjustments, as well as the installation of 700 lineal f eet of 8-inch gravity sewer to help provide capacity needs f or f uture development along L inder Road. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate P W Memo and Agreement Cover Memo 1/18/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate P ublic Works.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/18/2019 - 1:33 P M P ublic Works.B aird, Ted Approved 1/31/2019 - 12:01 P M P ublic Works.Watts, K eith Approved 1/31/2019 - 1:38 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 437 of 736 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 3 8 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 3 9 o f 7 3 6 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2019-020329 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=10 VICTORIA BAILEY 03/15/2019 09:17 AM SETTLERS IRRIGATION NO FEE 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111 00601830201900203290100109 LICENSE AGREEMENT This LICENSE AGREEMENT, is made and entered into thisC3�j day of Pbwro, 2019, by and between SETTLERS IRRIGA'T'ION DISTRICT, an irrigation district organized and existiAg under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as the "District," and CITY OF MERIDIAN, c/o Public Works Department, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho 83642, hereinafter referred to as the "Licensee," WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the District owns the irrigation ditch or canal known as the COLEMAN LATERAL (hereinafter referred to as "ditch or canal"), an integral part of the irrigation and drainage works and system ofthe District, together with the easement therefor to convey irrigation and drainage water, to operate, clean, maintain, and repair the ditch or canal, and to access the ditch or canal for those purposes; and, WHEREAS, the District operates, cleans, maintains, repairs and protects the ditch or canal for the benefit of District landowners; and, WHEREAS, the Licensee is the owner of real property/right-of-way for two water lines and a sewer line that is servient to the District's ditch or canal and easement, and is particularly described in the "Legal Description" and/or deed attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, the ditch or canal crosses and intersects the real property described in Exhibit A as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, the Licensee desires a license to cross, encroach upon or modify said ditch or canal and/or the District's easement under the terms and conditions of this License Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration ofthe premises and ofthe covenants, agreements and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: A. Acknowledgment of the District's Easement 1. Licensee acknowledges that the District's easement for the ditch or canal includes a sufficient area of land to convey irrigation and drainage water, to operate, clean, maintain and repair the ditch LICENSE AGREEMENT - 1 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 4 1 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 4 2 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 4 3 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 4 4 o f 7 3 6 6. Notices. Any and all notices, demands, consents and approvals required pursuant to this License Agreement shall be delivered to the parties as follows: Settlers Irrigation District P.O. Box 7571 Boise, ID 83707 See page 1 for Licensee Notices shall be deemed to have been delivered upon hand deposit in the United States mail as provided above. 7. Counterparts. This License Agreement maybe executed and delivered in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and al l of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the District has hereunto caused its name to be subscribed by its officers first hereunto duly authorized by resolution of its Board of Directors and the Licensee has caused its name to be subscribed by its duly authorized officer/agent, all as of the day and year herein first above written. ATTEST: f Its egret LICENSE AGREEMENT - 6 SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT By 9h Its President Ube- Aj I ' I 1 x� o�VoRNYEDA G , ofawt'ny Elw IDIAN i IDAHO ` . SEAL -) STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: County of Ada ) ZRIlele On this day ofQI3, before me, the undersigned, ary Pubic in and for said State, personally appeared �gh and Stefan ie Steen, known to me to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT, the irrigation district that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that such irrigation district executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my band and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. OHVall d0 31V1S onend AdV1.ON 6 MM N0I891VV400 SINUVd 30AUS 'S STATE OF IDAHO ) )ss. County of Ada ) Notary Public for Waho Residing at%�iu.. Idaho My Commission Expires: 7A On this 51h day of FtkWUQ .20A before me, the undersigned, anotary public in and for said state, personally appeared 1`�1 and �,' . O known to me to be the Hduw and , of CITY OF MERIDIAN, the entity that exe ted the foregoing instrument, aindArknowledged to me that such entity executed the same. INWITNES S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. CHARLENE WAY - COMMISSION 08730 NOTARY PU13LIC STATE OF MY COMMISSION EXPIRE S 3128122 LICENSE AGREEMENT - 7 Notary Public for Residing at MjjjjA My Commission Expires: 3-a S - 2027. M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 4 7 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 4 8 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 4 9 o f 7 3 6 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 S Project File Number: Item Title: PY18 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Meeting Notes: Subrecipient Agreement with Meridian Development Corporation (MDC) for a Not -to -Exceed amount of $180,000. 07 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.S . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - P Y18 Community D evelopment B lock Grant (C D B G) S ubrecipient Agreement with M eridian D evelopment Corporation (M D C ) for a Not-to-E xceed amount of $180,000. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate MD C A greement Cover Memo 1/28/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Community Development.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/28/2019 - 6:06 P M Community Development.B aird, Ted Approved 1/31/2019 - 12:02 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 450 of 736 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 5 1 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 5 2 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 5 3 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 5 4 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 5 5 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 5 6 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 5 7 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 5 8 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 5 9 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 6 0 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 6 1 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 6 2 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 6 3 o f 7 3 6 CITY: City of Meridian Attest: By: Tammy e eerd, Mayor -teo AUGUST' .J y Coles, ity Clerk Qo a w �r (Ity U � g IDR I I 1 DAHD \y� SEAL U PY 18 SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT- MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PAGE 14 OF 15 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 6 5 o f 7 3 6 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 T Project File Number: Item Title: Approval of Contract to Track Utilities, LLC for the "WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS - CONSTRUCTION" project for a Not -To -Exceed amount of $267,410.50. Meeting Notes: ON I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.T. Presenter: Consent Estimated Time f or P resentation: Consent Title of I tem - Approval of Contract to T rack Utilities, L L C for the “WRRF P RIM ARY P O WE R IM P RO V E M E NT S - C O NS T RUC T IO N” project for a Not-To-E xceed amount of $267,410.50. C ouncil Notes: T his contract is the result of negotiations. A formal bid was issued on J uly 6th but no bids were received. AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Council Memo Cover Memo 1/18/2019 Contract - W R R F P rimary P ower I mprovements Cover Memo 1/18/2019 Contract C hecklist Cover Memo 1/18/2019 B udget R eport Cover Memo 1/18/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate F inance.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/18/2019 - 1:32 P M F inance.B aird, Ted Approved 1/31/2019 - 11:58 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 467 of 736 Page 1 Memo To: C. Jay Coles, City Clerk, From: Keith Watts, Purchasing Manager CC: Dan Berthe Date: 1/18/2019 Re: February 5 th City Council Meeting Agenda Item The Purchasing Department respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the February 5 th City Council Consent Agenda for Council’s consideration. Approval of Contract to Track Utilities, LLC for the “WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS - CONSTRUCTION” project for a Not-To-Exceed amount of $267,410.50. Recommended Council Action: Approval of Contract to Track Utilities, LLC for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $267,410.50. Thank you for your consideration. City of Meridian Purchasing Dept. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 468 of 736 CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT # 10751.B THIS CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION is made this 1 1tn day of December,2018, and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of ldaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY', 33 East Broadway Avenue, Jr/eridian, ldaho 83642, and Track Utilities. LLC, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR", whose business address is 441 W. Corporate Drive, Meridian. lD 83642 and whose Public Works Contractor License # is 015324. INTRODUCTION Whereas, the City has a need for services involving Primarv Power lmprovements; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform and has agreed to provide such services; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows: TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Scope of Work: 1.1 CONTRACTOR shall perform and furnish to the City upon execution of this Contract and receipt of the City's written notice to proceed, all services and work, and comply in all respects, as specified in the document titled "Scope of Work" a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, together with any amendments that may be agreed to in writing by the parties. 1.2 All documents, drawings and written work product prepared or produced by the Contractor under this Agreement, including without limitation electronic data files, are the property of the Contractor; provided, however, the City shall have the right to reproduce, publish and use all such work, or any part thereof, in any manner and for any purposes whatsoever and to authorize others to do so. lf any such work is copyrightable, the Contractor may copyright the same, except that, as to any work which is copyrighted by the Contractor, the City reserves a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish and use such work, or any part thereof, and to authorize others to do so. 1.3 The Contractor shall provide services and work under this Agreement consistent with the requirements and standards established by applicable federal, state and city laws, ordinances, regulations and resolutions. The Contractor WRRF PRIMARY POWER ||\4PROVEMENTS page 1 of 14 Project 10751.8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 469 of 736 represents and warrants that it will perform its work in accordance with generally accepted industry standards and practices for the profession or professions that are used in performance of this Agreement and that are in effect at the time of performance of this Agreement. Except for that representation and any representations made or contained in any proposal submitted by the Contractor and any reports or opinions prepared or issued as part of the work performed by the Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor makes no other warranties, either express or implied, as part of this Agreement. 1 .4 Services and work provided by the Contractor at the City's request under this Agreement will be performed in a timely manner in accordance with a Schedule of Work, which the parties hereto shall agree to. The Schedule of Work may be revised from time to time upon mutual written consent of the parties. 2. Consideration 2.1 The Contractor shall be compensated on a Not-To-Exceed basis as provided in Exhibit B "Payment Schedule" attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $267,410.50. 2.2 The Contractor shall provide the City with a monthly statement and supporting invoices, as the work warrants, of fees earned and costs incurred for services provided during the billing period, which the City will pay within 30 days of receipt of a correct invoice and approval by the City. The City will not withhold any Federal or State income taxes or Social Security Tax f rom any payment made by City to Contractor under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Payment of all taxes and other assessments on such sums is the sole responsibility of Contractor. 2.3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Contractor shall not be entitled to receive from the City any additionalconsideration, compensation, salary, wages, or other type of remuneration for services rendered under this Agreement including, but not limited to, meals, lodging, transportation, drawings, renderings or mockups. Specifically, Contractor shall not be entitled by virtue of this Agreement to consideration in the form of overtime, health insurance benefits, retirement benefits, paid holidays or other paid leaves of absence of any type or kind whatsoever. 3. Term: 3.1 This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties, and shall expire upon (a) completion of the agreed upon work, (b) or unless sooner terminated as provided in Sections 3.2, 3.3, and Section 4 below or unless some other method or time of termination is listed in Exhibit A. g.2 Should Contractor default in the performance of this Agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to Contractor. WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS PAgC 2 Of 14 Project 10751.B Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 470 of 736 3.3 Should City fail to pay Contractor all or any part of the compensation set forth in Exhibit B of this Agreement on the date due, Contractor, at the Contractor's option, may terminate this Agreement if the failure is not remedied by the City within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due. 4. Liquidated Damages: Substantial Completion shall be accomplished within 150 (one hundred fifty) calendar days from Notice to Proceed. This project shall be considered Substantially Complete when the Owner has fulland unrestricted use and benefit of the facilities, both from an operational and safety standpoint, and only minor incidental work, corrections or repairs remain for the physical completion of the total contract. Contractor shall be liable to the City for any delay beyond this time period in the amount of $500.00 (five hundred dollars) per calendar day. Such payment shall be construed to be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of any claim or damage because of such delay and not be construed as a penalty. Upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed, the Contractor shall have 180 (one hundred eighty) calendar days to complete the work as described herein. Contractor shall be liable to the City for any delay beyond this time period in the amount of $500.00 (five hundred dollars) per calendar day. Such payment shall be construed to be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of any claim or damage because of such delay and not be construed as a penalty. See fi/ilestones listed in the Payment Schedule for Substantial Completion. 5. Termination: 5.1 lf , through any cause, CONTRACTOR, its officers, employees, or agents fails to f ulf ill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shallthereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to CONTRACTOR of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination. CONTRACTOR may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least sixty (60) days notice to CITY. ln the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or unfinished documents, data, and reports prepared by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property, and CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily complete hereunder. 5.2 Notwithstanding the above, CONTRACTOR shall not be relieved of liability to the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS page 3 of 14 Project 10751.8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 471 of 736 Agreement by CONTRACTOR, and the CITY may withhold any payments to CONTRACTOR for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the CITY from CONTRACTOR is determined. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve CONTRACTOR of its liability to the CITY for damages. 6. lndependent Contractor: 6.1 ln all matters pertaining to this agreement, CONTRACTOR shallbe acting as an independent contractor, and neither CONTRACTOR nor any officer, employee or agent of CONTRACTOR will be deemed an employee of CITY. Except as expressly provided in Exhibit A, Contractor has no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City and therefore has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of the City. The selection and designation of the personnel of the CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by the CITY. 6.2 Contractor, its agents, officers, and employees are and at alltimes during the term of this Agreement shall represent and conduct themselves as independent contractors and not as employees of the City. 6.3 Contractor shalldetermine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. lf in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction and supervision and control of the Contractor. 7. Sub-Contractors: Contractor shall require that allof its sub-contractors be licensed per State of ldaho Statute # 54-1901 8. Removal of Unsatisfactory Employees: The Contractor shall only f urnish employees who are competent and skilled for work under this contract. lf , in the opinion of the City, an employee of the Contractor is incompetent or disorderly, refuses to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract, threatens or uses abusive language while on City property, or is otherwise unsatisfactory, that employee shall be removed from all work under this contract. 9. lndemnification and lnsurance: 9.1 CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY and it's elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and for any and WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEI\TENTS page 4 of 14 Project 10751.8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 472 of 736 all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses and other costs including litigation costs and attorney's fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the CONTRACTOR, its servants, agents, officers, employees, guests, and business invitees, and not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of CITY or its employees. CONTRACTOR shall maintain, and specifically aqrees that it will maintain. throuohout the term of this Aqreement, liabilitv insurance, in which t he CITY shallbe named an additionalin red in the minimum amounts as follow: General Liability One lt/illion Dollars ($1,000,000) per incident or occurrence, Automobile Liability !nsurance One lt/illion Dollars ($1,000,000) per incident or occurrence and Workers' Compensation lnsurance, in the statutory limits as required by law.. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY; and if CITY becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits, herein provided, CONfRACTOR covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY f rom and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or injury to persons or property and other costs, including litigation costs and attorneys' fees, arising out of, resulting from , or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the Contractor or Contractor's officers, employs, agents, representatives or subcontractors and resulting in or attributable to personal injury, death, or damage or destruction to tangible or intangible property, including use of. CONTRACTOR shall provide CITY with a Certificate of lnsurance, or other proof of insurance evidencing CONTRACTOR'S compliance with the requirements of this paragraph and file such proof of insurance with the CITY at least ten (10) days prior to the date Contractor begins performance of it's obligations under this Agreement. ln the event the insurance minimums are changed, CONTRACTOR shall immediately submit proof of compliance with the changed limits. Evidence of all insurance shallbe submitted to the City Purchasing Agent with a copy to lt/eridian City Accounting, 33 East Broadway Avenue, lt/eridian, ldaho 83642. 9.2 lnsurance is to be placed with an ldaho admitted insurer with a Best's rating of no less than A-. 9.3 Any deductibles, self-insured retention, or named insureds must be declared in writing and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles, self-insured retentions or named insureds; or the Contractor shall provide a bond, cash or letter of credit guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. 9.4 To the extent of the indemnity in this contract, Contractor's lnsurance coverage shall be primary insurance regarding the City's elected officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City or the City's elected officers, off icials, employees and volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with Contractor's insurance except as to the extent of City's negligence. WRRF PRIIVIARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS Project 10751.B page 5 of 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 473 of 736 9.5 The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 9.6 All insurance coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the insurance and indemnity requirements stated herein. 9.7 The limits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liability of the Contractor and Contractor's agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. 10. Time is of the Essence: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof , and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of , and a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform. 11. Bonds: Payment and Performance Bonds are required on all Public Works lmprovement Projects per the ISPWC and the City of l/eridian Supplemental Specifications & Drawings to the ISPWC, which by this reference are made a part hereof. Contractor is required to furnish faithful performance and payment bonds in the amount of 100% of the contract price issued by surety licensed to do business in the State of ldaho with a Best's rating of no less than A-. ln the event that the contract is subsequently terminated for failure to perform, the contractor and/or surety will be liable and assessed for any and all costs for the re-procurement of the contract services. 12. Warranty: All construction and equipment provided under this agreement shall be warranted for 2 years f rom the date of the City of lt/eridian acceptance per the ISPWC and the It/eridian Supplemental Specifications & Drawings to the ISPWC and any modifications, which by this reference are made a part hereof. All items found to be defective during a warranty inspection and subsequently corrected will require an additional two (2\ year warranty from the date of City's acceptance of the corrected work. 13. Changes: The CITY may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of Work to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of CONTRACTOR'S compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and CONTRACTOR, shall be incorporated in written amendments which shall be executed with the same formalities as this Agreement. WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS Project 10751.8 page 6 of 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 474 of 736 14. Taxes: The City of lt/eridian is exempt from Federal and State taxes and will execute the required exemption certificates for items purchased and used by the City. ltems purchased by the City and used by a contractor are subject to Use Tax. All other taxes are the responsibility of the Contractor and are to be included in the Contractor's Bid pricing. 15. MeridianStormwaterSpecifications: All construction projects require either a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or an erosion sediment control plan (ESCP) as specified in the City of lt/eridian Construction Stormwater N/anagement Program (CSWlvlP) manual. The CSWMP manual containing the procedures and guidelines can be found at this add ress : http ://www. meridiancitv.orq/envi ronmental.aspx?id= 1 36 1 8. Contractor shall retain allstormwater and erosion controldocumentation generated on site during construction including the SWPPP manual, field inspections and amendments. Prior to final acceptance of the job by the City the contractor shall return the field SWPPP manual and field inspection documents to the City for review. A completed Contractor Request to File Project N.O.T. with the EPA form shall be provided to the City with the documents. These documents shall be retained, reviewed and approved by the City prior to f inal acceptance of the project. 16. ACHD: Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with the City to obtain appropriate ACHD permit(s) and will reimburse the City for fees, fines, or penalties City incurs due to Contractor's violation of any ACHD policy. City shall certify to ACHD that Contractor is authorized to obtain a Temporary Highway and Right-of-Way Use Permit from ACHD on City's behalf. The parties acknowledge and agree that the scope of the agency granted by such certification is limited to, and conterminous with, the term and scope of this Agreement. 17. Reports and lnformation: 17.1 At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. 17.2 Contractor shall maintain all writings, documents and records prepared or compiled in connection with the performance of this Agreement for a minimum of four (4) years from the termination or completion of this or Agreement. This includes any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photo static, photographic and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or representation including letters, words, pictures, sounds or symbols or any combination thereof. WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS Project 10751.B page 7 ol 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 475 of 736 18. Audits and lnspections: At any time during normal business hours and as often as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all of CONTRACTOR'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall permit the CITY to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. 19. Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material: No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country. The CITY shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement. 20. Equa! Employment Opportunity: ln performing the work herein, Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of Title Vl and Vll of the Civil Rights Act, Revenue Sharing Act Title 31, U.S. Code Section 2176. Specifically, the Contractor agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, political affiliation, marital status, or handicap. Contractor will take affirmative action during employment or training to insure that employees are treated without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, political affiliation, marital status, or handicap. ln performing the Work required herein, CONTRACTOR shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 21. Employment of Bona Fide ldaho Residents: Contractor must comply with ldaho State Statute 44-1002 which states that the Contractor employ ninety-five percent (95%) bona fide ldaho residents. 22. Advice of Attorney: Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement. lt has received independent legal advice f rom its attorney's or the opportunity to seek such advice. 23. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys'fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS page 8 of 14 Project 10751.8 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 476 of 736 contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 24. ConstructionandSeverability: lf any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. 25. Waiver of Default: Waiver of default by either party to this Agreement shallnot be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach, and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless this Agreement is modified as provided above. 26. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral of written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. 27. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that CONTRACTOR shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate or sell any of its rights under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. 28. Payment Request: Payment requests shall be submitted to City of lt/eridian through the City's project management software. The Project lManager will compare the invoice against the Payment Schedule in the Agreement for compliance. Upon approvalthat the work has been done and is in compliance with the Agreement, the Project ft/anager will approve the pay request for processing. City of lt/eridian payment terms are Net 30 from the date City receives a correct invoice. Final payment will not be released until the City has received a tax release from the Tax Commission. 29. Cleanup: Contractor shall keep the worksite clean and free from debris. At completion of work and prior to requesting final inspection, the Contractor shall remove alltraces of waste materials and debris resulting from the work. Final payment will not be made if cleanup has not been performed. WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEIVIENTS Project 10751.8 page 9 of '14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 477 of 736 30. Order of Precedence: The order or precedence shall be the contract agreement, the Invitation for Bid document, then the winning bidders submitted bid document. 31. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of work required hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. 32. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. 33. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY CONTRACTOR City of Meridian Track Utilities, LLC Purchasing Manager Attn: Eric Boswell, Overhead Division Manager 33 E Broadway Ave Meridian, ID 83642 208-489-0417 Phone: Email: Idaho Public Works License #015324 Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. 34. Approval Required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the City of Meridian. CITY OF MERIDIAN BY: TAMMY de D, MAYOR WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS Project 10751.6 TRACK UTILITIES, LLC %� BY: '� ERIC BOSWELL, Overhead Division Manager page 10 of 14 Dated: d-/ �- Z S� (C( Dated: / — / 7- l Approved by Council: Attest: /Z/7 X - C.JAY OLES, C(y CLERK Purchasing Approval BY: ✓ KEITH WATTS, Purch asing Manager Dated:: / - /& - / c/ Project Manager Dan Berthe QO�p,S ED AUGUST OP � 20 w 0/ -WE IDIANty-- IDAHO V SEAL BY: `-� N' - WA REN STE ART, City Engineer Dated:: I/ i� '41f WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS page 11 of 14 Project 10751.13 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK SPECIFICATIONS / SCOPE OF WORK All construction work shall be done in accordance with the current version of the ldaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC), the 2013 City of A/leridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC (and any Addendums). See separate attached documents: Plans - by DC Engineering dated June 2018 (11pases)a WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS Project 10751.B Technical Specifications by DC Engineering dated June 2018 (155 pases) a page 12 ol 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 480 of 736 Exhibit B MILESTONE / PAYMENT SCHEDULE Total and complete compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed $267,410.50. A. WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS Project 10751.8 14 Days f rom Conditional Notice of Awardlvlilestone 1 Submission of all Submittals Preliminary Schedule of Submittals and Construction Schedule 7 Days prior to Preconstruction N/eetingN/ilestone 2 Owner-Accepted Schedule of Values, Schedule of Submittals and Construction Schedule 21 Days from Notice to Proceed Milestone 3 42Days from Notice to ProceedApproval of All SubmittalsN/ilestone 4 90 Days from Notice to Proceed N/ilestone 5 New Equipment Fully Tested and Commissioned Approval of Project Record Documents and Drawinqs 120 Days from Notice to Proceed It/ilestone 6 Substantial Completion 150 Days from Notice to ProceedN/ilestone 7 Milestone 8 Final Completion Contract includes furnishing all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals as required for the above named project per !FB PW-1851-10751.B NOT TO EXCEED CONTRACT TOTAL.$267.410.50 Contract is a not to exceed amount. Line item pricing below will be used for invoice verilication and any additional increases or decreases in work requested by city. The City will pay the contractor based on actual quantities of each item of work in accordance with the contract documents. ltem No.Description Quantity Unit Unit Price 1 N/ISCELLAN EOUS SU RFACE RESTORATION - LAWN SOD 1 LS 53,s77.43 2 TYPE C SURFACE RESTORATION -1 LS 53,428.s7 page 13 of 14 MI LESTON E DATES/SCHEDULE 180 Days f rom Notice to Proceed PRICING SCHEDULE Contract Pricing Schedule Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 481 of 736 GRAVEL AND ROCK WRRF PRIIVIARY POWER ITUPROVEMENTS Project 10751.8 3 TYPE P SURFACE RESTORATION. ASPHALT 1 LS Sra,ooo.oo 4 CONCRETE REPAIR 1 LS 56,834.14 5 STAGING AREA & STORM WATER CONTROL 1 LS S+,roo.oo 6 MOBILIZATION 1 LS ss,ooo.oo 7 MANHOLES 1 LS 52L,337.1.4 I CONTROL PULLBOXES 1 LS S8,347.13 9 DUCT BANK 1 LS S18,550.00 10 DUCT BANK CONCRETE ENCASEIUENT 1 LS 547,47s.o0 11 15-KV PHASE CONDUCTOR AND TERMINATIONS 1 LS 567,s43.36 12 6OO-V NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR AND TERMINATIONS 1 LS S5,1oo.s6 13 UNDERGROUND POLE RISERS ,|LS So,+so.:z 14 OVERHEAD MEDIUM VOLTAGE ASSEMBLIES 1 LS s9,101.36 15 SW ITCHGEAR INSTALLATION AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP PADS/GROUNDING 1 LS 5r7,s72.t3 16 SECTIONALIZING CABINET AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP PADS/GROUNDING 1 LS 5t4,t23.36 17 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM COMMISSIONING 1 LS Srz,soo.oo page 14 of 14 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 482 of 736 CONTRACT CHECKLIST Date: REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Project Name: Project Manager: Contract Amount: Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer: Is this a change order? Yes No Change Order No. Fund: Budget Available ( Purchasing attach report ): Department Yes No Construction GL Account FY Budget: Task Order Project Number: Enhancement: Yes No Professional Service Equipment Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes No Grant Grant #: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status (Federal Funded) Print and Attach the determination Print, attach and amend bid by addendum (if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach Master Agreement Category (Bid Results Attached) Yes No (Ratings Attached) Yes No Date MSA Roster Approved: Typical Award Yes No If no please state circumstances and conclusion: Date Award Posted: 7 day protest period ends: PW License Expiration Date: Corporation Status Insurance Certificates Received (Date): Expiration Date: Rating: Payment and Performance Bonds Received (Date): Rating: A Builders Risk Ins. Req'd: Yes No (Only applicabale for projects above $1,000,000) Reason Consultant Selected 1 Performance on past projects Check all that apply Quality of work On Budget On Time Accuracy of Construction Est 2 Qualified Personnel 3 Availability of personnel 4 Local of personnel Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation: Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: By: Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted (Only for PW Construction Projects) NTP Date: Contract Request Checklist.5.24.2016.Final Active 15324 6/30/2019 I. PROJECT INFORMATION N/A 19 1/18/2019 Public Works WRRF PRIMARY POWER IMPROVEMENTS V. BASIS OF AWARD N/A N/A IV. GRANT INFORMATION - to be completed only on Grant funded projects VI. CONTRACTOR / CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION Formal Bid was issued on July 6, 2018. NO BIDS WERE RECEIVED. January 18, 2019 VIII. AWARD INFORMATION Approval Date Enter Supervisor Name Date Approved VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete) 1/18/2019 Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected $267,411 Dan Berthe If yes, has policy been purchased? Track Utilities, LLC III. Contract Type II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete) 60 3590 92100 10751 TASK ORDER RFP / RFQ BID Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 483 of 736 City Of Meridian Detailed Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Keith 60 - Enterprise Fund 3590 - WW Construction Projects From 10/1/2018 Through 9/30/2019 Amendments Budget with Actual Current Year Remaining Budget Remaining Budget Percent of Capital Outlay 92100 WWTP - Bldg improvements 10751 Meridian WRRF Primary Electrical Distribution System Design 825,619.34 26,950.00 798,669.34 96.74% 10751.A WRRF Primary Elect. Dist. Sys. Transformer Purchase 0.00 421,326.50 (421,326.50) 0.00% Total Capital Outlay 825,619.34 448,276.50 377,342.84 45.70% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 825,619.34 448,276.50 377,342.84 45.70% Date: 1/18/19 09:50:48 AM Page: 1 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 484 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 U Project File Number: Item Title: Approval of Contract Amendment No. 2.a to extend the contract for "Landscape Maintenance Services" to Lawn Co. for the Not -to -Exceed amount of $180,952.20. Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.U. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Approval of Contract Amendment No. 2.a to extend the contract for “L andscape M aintenance S ervices” to L awn Co. for the Not-to-E xceed amount of $180,952.20. Madam Mayor and Members of the Council, please be informed; Dale B olthouse and P W Administrative team is aware and in the process of providing Purchasing with an approval to overspend the following account 60-3430-55704 by no less than $1,084.68 f or F Y19 L andscape Maintenance Services. Thank you, S andra Ramirez C ouncil Notes: Madam Mayor and Members of the Council, please be informed; Dale B olthouse and P W Administrative team is aware and in the process of providing Purchasing with an approval to overspend the following account 60-3430-55704 by no less than $1,084.68 f or F Y19 L andscape Maintenance Services. Thank you, S andra Ramirez AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Council Memo Cover Memo 1/30/2019 B udget R eports Cover Memo 1/30/2019 S igned Contract A mendment 2.a Cover Memo 1/30/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate F inance.Coles, C.J ay Approved 1/30/2019 - 5:27 P M F inance.B aird, Ted Approved 1/31/2019 - 11:57 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 485 of 736 Page 1 Memo To: C. Jay Coles, City Clerk From: Sandra Ramirez, Purchasing Specialist CC: Roger Norberg; Mike Barton; Steve Siddoway; Keith Watts Date: 01/30/2019 Re: February 5 th City Council Meeting Agenda Item The Purchasing Department, on behalf of the Parks Department, respectfully requests that the following item be placed on the February 5 th City Council Consent Agenda for Council’s consideration. Approval of Contract Amendment No. 2.a to extend the contract for “Landscape Maintenance Services” to Lawn Co. for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $180,952.20. This is the final of two one (1) year extensions; the contract was originally approved by Council on March 23, 2010. Recommended Council Action: Approval of Contract Amendment No. 2.a to Lawn Co. for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $180,952.20 and authorize the Purchasing Manager to sign the Purchase Orders for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $180,952.20. Thank you for your consideration. City of Meridian Purchasing Dept. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 486 of 736 City Of Meridian Detailed Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Sandra 5210 - Parks Maintenance Division 01 - General Fund From 10/1/2018 Through 9/30/2019 Amendments Budget with Actual Current Year Remaining Budget Remaining Budget Percent of OPERATING COSTS 55704 Contracted Services 197,307.96 0.00 197,307.96 100.00% 0000 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 0.00 35,710.00 (35,710.00)0.00% 10134.d Five Mile Creek Trailhead 2,250.00 0.00 2,250.00 100.00% 10151.a Landscape Maintenance 2015 - 2017 0.00 3,492.00 (3,492.00)0.00% 10151.b FY18-FY19 Landscape Maintenance 0.00 28,869.40 (28,869.40)0.00% 10980 Fuller Park 0.00 685.60 (685.60)0.00% Total OPERATING COSTS 199,557.96 68,757.00 130,800.96 65.55% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 199,557.96 68,757.00 130,800.96 65.55% Date: 1/30/19 11:55:31 AM Page: 1 1.25.19 - Finance to recode $1,885.60 from GL 5210 into 2 diff. accounts. The recode of the referenced amount will make the funds avaialble to generate a PO for Price Code 1 FY19 contract amount. Sandra Ramirez: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 487 of 736 City Of Meridian Detailed Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Sandra 3400 - Water - Admin 60 - Enterprise Fund From 10/1/2018 Through 9/30/2019 Amendments Budget with Actual Current Year Remaining Budget Remaining Budget Percent of OPERATING COSTS 55704 Contracted Services 6,800.04 0.00 6,800.04 100.00% 10151.b FY18-FY19 Landscape Maintenance 0.00 4,750.35 (4,750.35)0.00% Total OPERATING COSTS 6,800.04 4,750.35 2,049.69 30.14% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,800.04 4,750.35 2,049.69 30.14% Date: 1/30/19 11:56:44 AM Page: 1Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 488 of 736 City Of Meridian Detailed Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Sandra 3430 - Water - Production 60 - Enterprise Fund From 10/1/2018 Through 9/30/2019 Amendments Budget with Actual Current Year Remaining Budget Remaining Budget Percent of OPERATING COSTS 55704 Contracted Services 14,600.04 0.00 14,600.04 100.00% Total OPERATING COSTS 14,600.04 0.00 14,600.04 100.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 14,600.04 0.00 14,600.04 100.00% Date: 1/30/19 11:57:40 AM Page: 1 Sandra Ramirez: 1.30.19 as confirmed by the deaprtment; an overspend is in process and will be approved by Dale Bolthouse for no less than $1,084.68. The overspend to dept. code 3430 will be sufficient to generate an FY19 Price Code 2 PO. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 489 of 736 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 4 9 0 o f 7 3 6 CITY OF MERIDIAN BY: idlMde RD, MAYOR Dated: C) Attest;/ �� ';\ (711 or W C. COLES, ITY Ct_ K B IDjAN 2 IDAHO to SEAL l, 2,�� aPvv Parks De nt al ^@ rREAS��� 8Y: �� Mike Be on, Parks Superintendent LAWN CCf BY: Stephanie Ha e Dated: Z q Approved by City as to Content BY: KEITH WATTS, PURCHASING MANAGER Attachment B REVISED PAYMENT SCHEDULE A. Total and complete compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed $__180,952.20_. Totals are for a 36 week period from March 2019 to November 2019. B. Task Price Code 1 Contract Date Amount 1 TOTAL YEAR ONE (1) for 36 Weeks: Price Code 1 2015-2017 $125,365.00 2 TOTAL YEAR TWO (2) for 36 Weeks: Price Code 1 2018 $148,471.00 3 TOTAL YEAR THREE (3) for 36 Weeks: Price Code 1 2019 $159,671.00 TOTAL for THREE YEARS Price Code 1 2015-2017 thru 2019 $433,507.00 Price Code 2 4 TOTAL YEAR ONE (1) for 36 Weeks: Price Code 2 2015-2017 $12,565.00 5 TOTAL YEAR TWO (2) for 36 Weeks: Price Code 2 2018 $19,481.20 6 TOTAL YEAR THREE (3) for 36 Weeks: Price Code 2 2019 $21,281.20 TOTAL for THREE YEARS Price Code 2 2015-2017 thru 2019 $53,327.40 TOTALS Total and Complete Compensation Not-to-Exceed 2015-2017 $486,834.40 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 492 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 V Project File Number: Item Title: Resolution No. 19-2126: A Resolution Appointing Dave Neal to Seat 3 of the Solid Waste Advisory Commission. Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.V. Presenter: M ayor D eWeerd Estimated Time f or P resentation: 2 Title of I tem - Resolution No. 19-2126: A Resolution Appointing Dave Neal to Seat 3 of the Solid Waste Advisory Commission. R eso appointing D ave Neal to S WA C C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Reso Appointing D ave Neal to S WA C Resolution 1/29/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate L egal.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/29/2019 - 5:09 P M L egal.A lbertson, Michelle Approved 1/29/2019 - 5:54 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 493 of 736 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 19-2126 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ESTABLISHING THE APPOINTMENT OF DAVE NEAL TO SEAT 3 OF THE MERIDIAN SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Meridian City Code § 2-6-1 establishes the Solid Waste Advisory Commission, its members and terms of their appointments; and WHEREAS, Seat 3 of the Meridian Solid Waste Advisory Commission is currently vacant; and WHEREAS, Dave Neal is currently a member of the Meridian Solid Waste Advisory Commission in Seat 7 as the director of Public Works designee; and WHEREAS, on January 15, 2019 the Mayor and City Council for the City of Meridian approved Resolution No 19-1804 modifying Meridian City Code Section 2-6-3 regarding Membership; Qualifications to delete the director of Public Works designee; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council for the City of Meridian wish to appoint Dave Neal to Seat 3 of the Meridian Solid Waste Advisory Commission as the industry expert in Solid Waste with a term to expire September 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian deems the appointment of Dave Neal to Seat 3 of the Solid Waste Advisory Commission as the industry expert to be in the best interest of the Meridian Solid Waste Advisory Commission and of the City of Meridian; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That, pursuant to Meridian City Code § 2-6-3, Dave Neal is hereby appointed to Seat 3 of Meridian Solid Waste Advisory as the industry expert, with a tern to expire September 30, 2021; Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this � day of February, 2019. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this5 day of February, 2019. ��-r� A� APPROVED: de Weerd I IL IL : rr Cily of w EIDIAN� IDAHO SEAL -, %PC.Jay les� City Cleric v RESOLUTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF DAVE NEAL T�-rnr 5 LID WASTE ADVISORY COMMISSION - Page 1 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 W Project File Number: Item Title: Resolution 19-2127: A Resolution Declaring The Intent Of The City Of Meridian To Convey To The Ada County Highway District For Right Of Way Purposes A Portion Of Certain Real Property Located Near The Northerly Pedestrian Entrance To Heroes Park On Ten Mile Road, Meeting Notes: In Section 26, T4n, R1w, Bm (A Portion Of Ada County Assessor's Parcel 50426233770) In The City Of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; Instructing The City Clerk To Establish And Notice A Hearing To Review The Proposed Conveyance; And Providing An Effective Date. 5 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.W. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Resolution 19-2127: A Resolution D eclaring T he Intent Of T he City Of M eridian To Convey To T he Ada County Highway District F or Right Of Way P urposes A Portion Of C ertain Real P roperty L ocated Near T he Northerly P edestrian E ntrance To Heroes P ark On Ten M ile Road, In Section 26, T 4n, R1w, Bm (A Portion Of Ada County Assessor ’s P arcel S0426233770) In T he City O f M eridian, Ada County, Idaho; Instructing T he C ity C lerk To Establish And Notice A Hearing To Review T he P roposed C onveyance; And Providing An Effective D ate. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Resolution Resolution 1/31/2019 parcel map showing location of af f ected property B ackup Material 1/31/2019 Notice f or P ublication E xhibit 1/31/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate L egal.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/31/2019 - 12:48 P M L egal.B aird, Ted Approved 1/31/2019 - 3:13 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 495 of 736 RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENT TO CONVEY REAL PROPERTY – PAGE 1 OF 5 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 19-2127 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENT OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO CONVEY TO THE ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT FOR RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHERLY PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE TO HEROES PARK ON TEN MILE ROAD, IN SECTION 26, T4N, R1W, BM (A PORTION OF ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR’S PARCEL S0426233770) IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; INSTRUCTING THE CITY CLERK TO ESTABLISH AND NOTICE A HEARING TO REVIEW THE PROPOSED CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE .. WHEREAS , whenever the City Council proposes to convey any real property, Idaho Code Section 50-1402 requires a declaration of the City Council setting forth the value or minimum price, if any, it intends to receive as a result of such conveyance or exchange; and, WHEREAS , the declaration may be in the form of an explanation of an intended exchange or conveyance for other than monetary consideration; and, WHEREAS , when it is determined by the City Council to be in the City’s best interest that a transfer or conveyance be made, the City Council may, pursuant to the procedure set forth in Idaho Code Section 50-1403, authorize the transfer or conveyance of any real property owned by the City to any tax supported governmental unit, with or without consideration; and, WHEREAS , pursuant to an Intergovernmental Agreement for waiver of certain costs and fees, Meridian has agreed to transfer unimproved rights-of-way without charge to ACHD; and, WHEREAS , the Ada County Highway District has requested that the City Council of the City of Meridian set a hearing to consider the transfer certain real property from the City to the District for right-of-way purposes; and, WHEREAS , following this declaration of intent, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of the action taken by the City Council and provide notice of a public hearing before the City Council at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date of the hearing. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 496 of 736 Section 1. That it is hereby declared that the City of Meridian intends to convey to the Ada County Highway District 1,298 square feet of real property located on Ten Mile Road at the Northerly pedestrian entrance to Heroes Park as described and depicted in the attached Exhibit 0 Section 2. That the City of Meridian hereby declares its intention to convey the real property without consideration because it is in the City's best interest that the Ada County Highway District take ownership of the property for right-of-way purposes as part of the Ten Mile Road widening project, McMillan Road to Chinden Boulevard. Section 3. That the City Cleric is hereby instructed to publish a summary for this declaration of intent, and establish a public hearing date to review the proposal to convey the real property in the form set forth in Exhibit B. Section 4. That the City Attorney is hereby instructed to bring forth a proposed Ordinance as required by Idaho Code Section 50-1403 for the consideration of the City Council at the conclusion of the public hearing. Section 5. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 5t" day of February, 2019. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 5th day of February, 2019. ATTU AUGUST 7 QQO r '90\ ° � ;. �� IAS 1 , "° u J APPROVED: ell, Mayor T y de Weerd RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENT TO CONVEY REAL PROPERTY - PAGE 2 of 5 RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENT TO CONVEY REAL PROPERTY – PAGE 3 OF 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 498 of 736 RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENT TO CONVEY REAL PROPERTY – PAGE 4 OF 5 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 499 of 736 RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENT TO CONVEY REAL PROPERTY – PAGE 5 OF 5 EXHIBIT B SUMMARY OF ACTION TAKEN REGARDING INTENT TO CONVEY REAL PROPERTY AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SUMMARY OF ACTION TAKEN : On the 5th day of February, 2019, the City Council of the City of Meridian approved Resolution No. ___________ declaring the intent of the City to convey to the Ada County Highway District 1,298 square feet of city-owned real property located in Section 26, T4N, R1W, BM (a portion of Ada County Assessor’s Parcel S0426233770) in the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. The City of Meridian intends to convey the real property without consideration because it is in the City’s best interest that the Ada County Highway District take ownership of the property for right-of-way purposes as part of the Ten Mile Road widening project, McMillan Road to Chinden Boulevard. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: Pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho (including but not limited to Idaho Code section 50-1403), the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 5, 2019 for the purpose of considering and approving the proposed real property conveyance. For further information, please contact the City Clerks Office at 888-4433. Publish: 15th day of February, 2019 C.JAY COLES, CITY CLERK Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 500 of 736 0 50 100ft I want to...AerialsOn Sign inSearch... Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 501 of 736 SUMMARY OF ACTION TAKEN REGARDING INTENT TO CONVEY REAL PROPERTY AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SUMMARY OF ACTION TAKEN : On the 5 th day of February, 2019, the City Council of the City of Meridian approved Resolution No. ___________ declaring the intent of the City to convey to the Ada County Highway District 1,298 square feet of city-owned real property located in Section 26, T4N, R1W, BM (a portion of Ada County Assessor’s Parcel S0426233770) in the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. The City of Meridian intends to convey the real property without consideration because it is in the City’s best interest that the Ada County Highway District take ownership of the property for right-of-way purposes as part of the Ten Mile Road widening project, McMillan Road to Chinden Boulevard. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: Pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho (including but not limited to Idaho Code section 50-1403), the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 5, 2019 for the purpose of considering and approving the proposed real property conveyance. For further information, please contact the City Clerks Office at 888-4433. Publish: 15th day of February, 2019 C.JAY COLES, CITY CLERK Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 502 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 X Project File Number: Item Title: City of Meridian Financial Report - December 2018 Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.X . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - C ity of M eridian F inancial Report - D ecember 2018 C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate City of Meridian F inancial Report - D ec. 2018 Cover Memo 1/24/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate F inance.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/24/2019 - 12:17 P M F inance.Cunningham, R eta Approved 1/31/2019 - 1:48 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 503 of 736 REPORT NAME PAGE # General Fund Balance 2 Enterprise Fund Balance 3 Investment Graphs 4 WATER - Budget to Actual Comparison 5 WWTP - Budget to Actual Comparison 6 Public Works/Billing Budget to Actual Comparison 7 Enterprise Fund - Budget to Actual Comparison 8 Enterprise Fund - Graphs 9 Utility Sales Revenue Comparison 10 General Fund Expenditures - Budget to Actual Comparison 11 General Fund - Graphs 12 General Fund Revenue - Budget to Actual Comparison 13 Community Development - Forecast 14 Community Development - Budget to Actual Comparison 15 Community Development - Graphs 16 Impact Fund - Summary 17 Overtime Graphs 18 Volunteer Hours 19 Vacant Positions 20 Internal Transfers 21 Revenue & Expense Details 22 - 59 Table of Contents FINANCE REPORT December 2018 CITY of MERIDIAN Month 3 of FY2019 (Oct 1 - Sep 30) 1 of 59 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 504 of 736 CITY of MERIDIAN FY2019 General Fund Balance Projection (based on approved Budget) As of 1/11/2019 Unrestricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted BUDGET Based Fund Balance PROJECTION Fund 01 Fund 07 Fund 07 Fund 07 Fund 08 Fund 55 General Fund Parks - Impact Fire - Impact Police - Impact Public Safety Capital Improve. Total Unrestricted Fund Balance As of 9/30/18 39,090,580 $ 4,844,596 $ 6,382,796 $ 1,855,202 $ 1,397,845 $ 10,815,380 $ 64,386,399 $ Current Year Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Year 2019 Budgeted Revenue 52,656,602 $ 1,504,619 $ 854,092 $ 215,573 $ -$ 2,000 $ 55,232,886 $ Fiscal Year 2019 Budgeted Ops Expenses 51,297,450 $ -$ 20,000 $ -$ -$ -$ 51,317,450 $ Fiscal Year 2019 Budgeted Cap Expenses 2,368,268 $ 708,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,076,268 $ Fiscal Year 2019 Budgeted Transfers (2,798,794) $ -$ -$ -$ 308,081 $ 154,040 $ (2,336,673) $ Beg FY19 Current Yr NET Revenues (Expenditures) 1,789,678 $ 796,619 $ 834,092 $ 215,573 $ (308,081) $ (152,040) $ 3,175,841 $ Net Fund Balance (Projected using Budget $) 40,880,258 $ 5,641,215 $ 7,216,888 $ 2,070,775 $ 1,089,764 $ 10,663,340 $ 67,562,240 $ FY2019 Amendments Fire Station 4 Fire Alarm Panel System Replacement 11,000 $ 11,000 $ Mechanical Program 727,108 $ 727,108 $ Replacement of CID Dodge Avenger Unit# 26 29,000 $ 29,000 $ Solid Waste Coordinator 10 $ 10 $ SWAC Projects 27,458 $ 27,458 $ IHS Animal Control Contract 9,528 $ 9,528 $ Shooting Range Membership 59,000 $ 59,000 $ -$ Total Amendments 863,104 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 863,104 $ Current Yr NET change to fund balance Rev (Exp) 926,574 $ 796,619 $ 834,092 $ 215,573 $ (308,081) $ (152,040) $ 2,312,737 $ Net Projected Fund Balance after Amendments 40,017,154 $ 5,641,215 $ 7,216,888 $ 2,070,775 $ 1,089,764 $ 10,663,340 $ 66,699,136 $ Carryforward Operating 758,471 $ 758,471 $ Carryforward Capital 3,259,539 $ 2,057,257 $ 4,560,196 $ -$ 3,011,953 $ 12,888,945 $ Carryfoward Adjustment -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FY19 Comm Dev Transfer 3,354,153 $ (3,354,153) $ -$ FY19 Public Safety Fund Transfer -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Carryforwards 7,372,163 $ 2,057,257 $ 4,560,196 $ -$ -$ (342,200) $ 13,647,416 $ Net Projected Fund Balance after Amendments & Carryforwards 32,644,991 $ 3,583,958 $ 2,656,692 $ 2,070,775 $ 1,089,764 $ 11,005,540 $ 53,051,720 $ Operating Reserves - 4 months 16,722,999 $ 16,722,999 $ Net Projected Fund Balance after Reserves (Budget based) 15,921,992 $ 3,583,958 $ 2,656,692 $ 2,070,775 $ 1,089,764 $ 11,005,540 $ 36,328,721 $ Unrestricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted Restricted ACTUAL NET FUND BALANCE as of 12/31/2018 Fund 01 Fund 07 Fund 07 Fund 07 Fund 08 Fund 55 General Fund Parks - Impact Fire - Impact Police - Impact Public Safety Public Safety Total Unrestricted Fund Balance as of 09/30/18 39,090,580 $ 4,844,596 $ 6,382,796 $ 1,855,202 $ 1,397,845 $ 10,815,380 $ 64,386,399 $ FYTD Actual Revenues 3,789,836 $ 859,452 $ 688,845 $ 223,939 $ 8,188 $ 63,173 $ 5,633,433 $ FYTD Actual Operating Expenses 12,465,846 $ 11,898 $ 7,002 $ 2,265 $ -$ -$ 12,487,011 $ FYTD Actual Capital Expenses 612,652 $ 767,199 $ 147,033 $ -$ -$ -$ 1,526,884 $ FYTD Actual General Fund Transfers 750,453 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,453 $ ACTUAL NET FUND BALANCE as of 12/31/2018 30,552,371 $ 4,924,951 $ 6,917,606 $ 2,076,876 $ 1,406,033 $ 10,878,553 $ 56,756,390 $ NOTE: Budget Based Fund Balance reflects if ALL approved spend for the year occurs by 09/30/19 Actual YTD Fund Balance reflects actual spend to date, no future spend or reserves included 2of2 Gen Fund BalanceMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 505 of 736 CITY of MERIDIAN FY2019 Enterprise Fund Balance Projection (based on approved Budget) As of 1/11/2019 Unrestricted Fund 60 BUDGET Based Fund Balance PROJECTION Enterprise Unrestricted Fund Balance As of 9/30/18 39,509,603 $ Current Year Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Year 2019 Budgeted Revenue 38,183,220 $ Fiscal Year 2019 Budgeted Ops Expenses 17,566,249 $ Fiscal Year 2019 Budgeted Cap Expenses 15,890,500 $ Fiscal Year 2019 Budgeted Transfers 2,798,794 $ Beg FY19 Current Yr NET Revenues(Expenditures) 1,927,677 $ Net Projected Fund Balance 41,437,280 $ FY2019 Amendments Solid Waste Coordinator 93,430 $ Total Amendments 93,430 $ Current Yr NET change to fund balance Rev(Exp) 1,834,247 $ Net Fund Balance after Amendments 41,343,850 $ FY2019 Carryforwards Carryforward Operating 822,410 $ Carryforward Capital 28,108,199 $ Carryfoward Adjustment -$ Total Carryforwards 28,930,609 $ Net Projected Fund Balance after Amendments & Carryforwards 12,413,241 $ Operating Reserves - 6 months 8,308,569 $ Depreciation Reserve -$ Emergency Reserve 1,000,000 $ Total Reserves 9,308,569 $ Net Fund Balance (Projected using Budget $) after Reserves 3,104,672 $ ACTUAL NET FUND BALANCE as of 12/31/2018 Actual Fund 60 Unrestricted Fund Balance as of 09/30/18 39,509,603 $ FYTD Actual Revenues 11,520,606 $ FYTD Actual Operating Expenses 3,670,368 $ FYTD Actual Capital Expenses 3,805,367 $ FYTD Actual General Fund Transfers 750,453 $ ACTUAL Based NET FUND BALANCE as of 09/30/2018 42,804,021 $ NOTE: Budget Based Fund Balance reflects if ALL approved spend for the year occurs by 09/30/19 Actual YTD Fund Balance reflects actual spend to date, no future spend or reserves included 3of3 Enterprise Fund BalanceMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 506 of 736 City of Meridian Investments and Cash Position FY2019 for Month Ending 12/31/18 City of Meridian Investment Portfolio Govern Bonds $22,514,787 Muncipal Bonds $1,128,274 Certif of Deposit $0 Investor Cash $4,118,345 FIB MoneyMarket $1,583,382 Cash $1,266,969 Idaho Bond Fund $21,026,179 Idaho State Pool $53,074,252 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00% 4.50% Yield by Investment Type $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 General Enterprise City of Meridian Interest Income by Fund (GF includes restricted and designated funds) Total Budget Budget YTD Actual YTD Prior YTD $- $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 $70,000,000 General Enterprise Fund City of Meridian Investment/Cash Balance by Major Fund (GF includes restricted and designated funds) FY2019 FY2018 4 of 59 InvestmentsMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 507 of 736 City of Meridian Water Department Incuding PW Admin Costs - Enterprise Fund Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2019 for Month Ending 12/31/2018 Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PYTD Variance $ WATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Revenue Water Sales 9,152,804 $ 2,288,201 $ 2,110,160 $ (178,041) $ -8% 1,966,052 $ 144,108 $ Miscellaneous 270,000 $ 67,500 $ 100,443 $ 32,943 $ 49% 108,373 $ (7,929) $ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 589,981 $ 147,495 $ 108,659 $ (38,836) $ -26% 66,337 $ 42,322 $ Total Revenue 10,012,785 $ 2,503,196 $ 2,319,262 $ (183,935) $ -7% 2,140,761 $ Personnel Costs Administration 417,585 $ 104,396 $ 64,679 $ 39,717 $ 38% 61,728 $ 2,951 $ Operations 575,876 $ 143,969 $ 140,966 $ 3,003 $ 2% 135,536 $ 5,430 $ Distribution 653,518 $ 163,380 $ 167,236 $ (3,856) $ -2% 154,163 $ 13,073 $ Production 380,520 $ 95,130 $ 72,964 $ 22,166 $ 23% 63,768 $ 9,196 $ Backflow Prevention 127,531 $ 31,883 $ 31,642 $ 240 $ 1% 20,989 $ 10,653 $ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 2,330,929 $ 582,732 $ 505,661 $ 77,071 $ 13% 455,117 $ 50,544 $ Total Personnel Costs 4,485,959 $ 1,121,490 $ 983,148 $ 138,342 $ 12% 891,301 $ 91,847 $ Operating Costs Administration 588,419 $ 187,105 $ 197,405 $ (10,300) $ -6% 165,785 $ 31,621 $ Operations 847,164 $ 211,791 $ 6,724 $ 205,067 $ 97% 150,204 $ (143,480) $ Distribution 299,728 $ 74,932 $ 51,186 $ 23,746 $ 32% 50,117 $ 1,069 $ Production 1,204,771 $ 323,315 $ 228,400 $ 94,915 $ 29% 195,007 $ 33,393 $ Backflow Prevention 91,214 $ 22,803 $ 4,294 $ 18,510 $ 81% 4,552 $ (258) $ General Fund Transfer 1,283,937 $ 320,984 $ 350,791 $ (29,807) $ -9% 352,224 $ (1,434) $ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 941,393 $ 295,213 $ 175,425 $ 119,788 $ 41% 161,792 $ 13,634 $ Total Operating Costs 5,256,627 $ 1,436,144 $ 1,014,226 $ 421,918 $ 29% 1,079,681 $ (65,455) $ Operating Income (Loss) 270,199 $ (54,438) $ 321,888 $ 376,326 $ 169,780 $ 152,108 $ Capital Outlay Operations Administration 50,000 $ 45,514 $ 28,182 $ 17,333 $ 38% 9,700 $ 18,482 $ Distribution -$ -$ -$ -$ 63 $ (63) $ Production 140,000 $ 35,000 $ -$ 35,000 $ 100% -$ -$ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 17,750 $ 6,278 $ 2,235 $ 4,043 $ 64% -$ 2,235 $ Total Capital Outlay 207,750 $ 86,793 $ 30,417 $ 56,376 $ 65% 9,763 $ 20,653 $ Net Income (Loss) from Operations 62,449 $ (141,231) $ 291,471 $ 432,702 $ 160,016 $ 131,455 $ WATER CONSTRUCTION Revenue Residential Assessments 2,843,093 $ 710,773 $ 1,383,691 $ 672,918 $ 95% 1,241,017 $ 142,674 $ Commercial Assessments 510,485 $ 127,621 $ 77,559 $ (50,063) $ -39% 132,672 $ (55,114) $ Interest 100,000 $ 25,000 $ 89,020 $ 64,020 $ 256% 66,704 $ 22,316 $ Total Revenue 3,453,578 $ 863,395 $ 1,550,270 $ 686,875 $ 80% 1,440,394 $ 109,876 $ Operating Costs 18,000 $ 4,500 $ 2,527 $ 1,973 $ 44% 2,513 $ 15 $ Capital Construction Projects 6,743,082 $ 3,006,300 $ 709,760 $ 2,296,540 $ 76% 1,352,010 $ (642,250) $ Net Income (Loss) from Construction (3,307,504) $ (2,147,405) $ 837,983 $ 2,985,388 $ 85,871 $ 752,112 $ Water Department Net Income (Loss) (3,245,055) $ (2,288,636) $ 1,129,454 $ 3,418,090 $ 245,887 $ 883,567 $ Budget to Actual Prior Year to Date FY19 Public Drinking Water System Assessment $105K 5 of 59 Water Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 508 of 736 City of Meridian Waste Water Including PW Admin Costs - Enterprise Fund Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2019 for Month Ending 12/31/2018 Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PYTD Variance $ WASTE WATER OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Revenue Utility Sales 15,945,396 $ 3,986,349 $ 3,829,924 $ (156,425) $ -4% 3,722,893 $ 107,031 $ Miscellaneous -$ -$ 4,835 $ 4,835 $ 4,511 $ 324 $ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 589,981 $ 147,495 $ 108,659 $ (38,836) $ -26% 66,337 $ 42,322 $ Total Revenue 16,535,377 $ 4,133,844 $ 3,943,418 $ (190,426) $ -5% 3,793,740 $ 149,677 $ Personnel Costs Administration 378,631 $ 94,658 $ 74,166 $ 20,492 $ 22% 37,462 $ 36,704 $ Treatment Plant 1,506,229 $ 376,557 $ 341,558 $ 34,999 $ 9% 330,505 $ 11,054 $ Collection Lines 552,760 $ 138,190 $ 111,750 $ 26,440 $ 19% 106,900 $ 4,850 $ Pretreatment Division 164,902 $ 41,225 $ 36,648 $ 4,578 $ 11% 35,389 $ 1,259 $ Lab 462,174 $ 115,544 $ 105,403 $ 10,140 $ 9% 101,335 $ 4,069 $ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 2,330,929 $ 582,732 $ 505,661 $ 77,071 $ 13% 455,117 $ 50,544 $ Total Personnel Costs 5,395,625 $ 1,348,906 $ 1,175,186 $ 173,720 $ 13% 1,066,708 $ 455,117 $ Operating Costs Administration 352,075 $ 94,519 $ 90,879 $ 3,640 $ 4% 79,623 $ 11,256 $ Treatment Plant 2,148,259 $ 537,065 $ 427,742 $ 109,322 $ 20% 352,541 $ 75,201 $ Collection Lines 525,905 $ 148,726 $ 97,505 $ 51,221 $ 34% 57,760 $ 39,745 $ Pretreatment Division 18,885 $ 4,721 $ 1,426 $ 3,295 $ 70% 464 $ 963 $ Lab 223,730 $ 55,932 $ 48,040 $ 7,893 $ 14% 50,499 $ (2,460) $ General Fund Transfer 1,283,937 $ 320,984 $ 354,810 $ (33,826) $ -11% 356,480 $ (1,669) $ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 941,393 $ 295,213 $ 175,425 $ 119,788 $ 41% 161,792 $ 13,634 $ Total Operating Costs 5,494,184 $ 1,457,161 $ 1,195,828 $ 261,334 $ 18% 1,059,158 $ 136,669 $ Operating Income (Loss) 5,645,567 $ 1,327,777 $ 1,572,404 $ 244,627 $ 1,667,875 $ (95,471) $ Capital Outlay Operations Administration 15,500 $ 6,958 $ 15,625 $ (8,667) $ -125% 12,700 $ 2,925 $ Treatment Plant -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,346 $ (9,346) $ Collection Lines 62,000 $ 15,500 $ -$ 15,500 $ 100% -$ -$ 1/2 Billing/Public Works 17,750 $ 6,278 $ 2,235 $ 4,043 $ 64% -$ 2,235 $ Total Capital Outlay 95,250 $ 28,736 $ 17,860 $ 10,876 $ 38% 22,046 $ (0) $ Net Income (Loss) from Operations 5,550,317 $ 1,299,040 $ 1,554,544 $ 255,503 $ 20% 1,645,828 $ (0) $ WASTE WATER CONSTRUCTION Revenue Residential Assessments 5,596,845 $ 1,399,211 $ 2,839,204 $ 1,439,993 $ 103% 2,439,560 $ 0$ Commercial Assessments 958,121 $ 239,530 $ 299,107 $ 59,577 $ 25% 299,058 $ 0$ EPA Compliance Revenue 1,576,515 $ 394,129 $ 395,126 $ 997 $ 0% 374,061 $ 0$ Interest 50,000 $ 12,500 $ 174,221 $ 161,721 $ 1294% 130,316 $ 0$ Total Revenue 8,181,481 $ 2,045,370 $ 3,707,657 $ 1,662,287 $ 81% 3,242,995 $ 0$ Operating Costs 35,000 $ 8,750 $ 5,054 $ 3,696 $ 42% 5,025 $ 0$ Capital Construction Projects 24,747,202 $ 11,853,541 $ 3,047,330 $ 8,806,211 $ 74% 4,924,919 $ (0) $ Net Income (Loss) from Construction (16,600,721) $ (9,816,921) $ 655,273 $ (10,472,194) $ (1,686,950) $ (1) $ Waste Water Department Net Income (Loss) (11,050,404) $ (8,517,881) $ 2,209,817 $ 10,727,698 $ (41,121) $ 2,250,938 $ Budget to Actual Prior Year to Date 6 of 59 WWTP Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 509 of 736 City of Meridian Enterprise Overhead - Public Works/Utility Billing/Environmental Divisions Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2019 for Month Ending 12/31/2018 Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PTYD Variance $ Revenue PW Review Fees 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 72,726 $ (27,274) $ -27% 68,803 $ 3,923 $ Utility Billing Fees 779,961 $ 194,990 $ 144,591 $ (50,399) $ -26% 63,870 $ 80,721 $ Total Revenue 1,179,961 $ 294,990 $ 217,317 $ (77,673) $ -26% 132,673 $ 84,644 $ Personnel Costs 4,661,858 $ 1,165,465 $ 1,011,322 $ 154,143 $ 13% 910,233 $ (756,091) $ Operating Expense 1,882,786 $ 590,427 $ 350,851 $ 239,576 $ 41% 323,583 $ 27,267 $ Transfers 230,920 $ 57,730 $ 44,852 $ 12,878 $ 22% 40,108 $ 4,743 $ Total OE 2,113,706 $ 648,157 $ 395,702 $ 252,454 $ 39% 363,691 $ 32,011 $ Total PC & OE 6,775,564 $ 1,813,621 $ 1,407,024 $ 406,597 $ 22% 1,273,925 $ 133,099 $ Operating Income (Loss) (5,595,603) $ (1,518,631) $ (1,189,706) $ 328,925 $ (1,141,252) $ (48,454) $ Capital Outlay 35,500 $ 12,557 $ 4,470 $ 8,087 $ 64% -$ 4,470 $ Net Income (Loss) (5,631,103) $ (1,531,188) $ (1,194,176) $ 337,011 $ (1,141,252) $ (52,924) $ Budget to Actual Prior Year to Date 7 of 59 PWbilling Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 510 of 736 City of Meridian Total Enterprise Fund Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2019 for Month Ending 12/31/18 Unrestricted Net Position at 9/30/2016 39,509,603 $ Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PYTD Variance $ TOTAL UTILITY OPERATIONS Operating Revenue Water Sales 9,152,804 $ 2,288,201 $ 2,110,160 $ (178,041) $ -7.8% 1,966,052 $ 144,108 $ Wastewater Sales 15,945,396 $ 3,986,349 $ 3,829,924 $ (156,425) $ -3.9% 3,722,893 $ 107,031 $ Public Works/Utility Billing 1,179,961 $ 294,990 $ 217,317 $ (77,673) $ -26.3% 132,673 $ 84,644 $ Miscellaneous 270,000 $ 67,500 $ 105,278 $ 37,778 $ 56.0% 112,884 $ (7,606) $ Total Revenue 26,548,161 $ 6,637,040 $ 6,262,679 $ (374,361) $ -5.6% 5,934,501 $ 328,178 $ Personnel Costs Water Division 2,155,030 $ 538,758 $ 477,487 $ 61,271 $ 11.4% 436,184 $ 41,303 $ Wastewater Division 3,064,696 $ 766,174 $ 669,525 $ 96,649 $ 12.6% 611,591 $ 57,935 $ Public Works/Utility Billing 4,661,858 $ 1,165,465 $ 1,011,322 $ 154,143 $ 13.2% 910,233 $ 101,088 $ Total Personnel Costs 9,881,584 $ 2,470,396 $ 2,158,334 $ 312,062 $ 12.6% 1,958,008 $ 200,326 $ Operating Costs Water Division 3,031,297 $ 819,947 $ 488,010 $ 331,937 $ 40.5% 565,665 $ (77,655) $ Wastewater Division 3,268,854 $ 840,964 $ 665,592 $ 175,372 $ 20.9% 540,887 $ 124,705 $ Public Works/Utility Billing 1,882,786 $ 590,427 $ 350,851 $ 239,576 $ 40.6% 323,583 $ 27,267 $ Total Operating Costs 8,182,937 $ 2,251,337 $ 1,504,452 $ 746,885 $ 33.2% 1,430,135 $ 74,317 $ Total PC & OE 18,064,521 $ 4,721,733 $ 3,662,786 $ 1,058,947 $ 22.4% 3,388,143 $ 274,643 $ Capital Operations 303,000 $ 115,529 $ 48,277 $ 67,252 $ 58.2% 31,810 $ 16,467 $ General Fund Transfer 2,798,794 $ 699,698 $ 750,453 $ (50,754) $ -7.3% 748,812 $ Operations Income (Loss) 5,381,846 $ 1,100,080 $ 1,849,440 $ 749,361 $ 68.1% (748,812) $ 2,598,253 $ CONSTRUCTION Construction Revenue Residential Assessments 7,173,946 $ 1,793,486 $ 2,428,124 $ 634,638 $ 35.4% 2,321,753 $ 106,371 $ Commercial Assessments 1,468,606 $ 367,152 $ 376,665 $ 9,514 $ 2.6% 431,730 $ (55,065) $ Multi-Family Assessments 1,265,992 $ 316,498 $ 1,794,771 $ 1,478,273 $ 9.0% 1,358,824 $ 435,947 $ EPA Compliance Revenue 1,576,515 $ 394,129 $ 395,126 $ 997 $ 0.3% 374,061 $ 21,065 $ Interest 150,000 $ 37,500 $ 263,241 $ 225,741 $ 602.0% 197,020 $ 66,221 $ Total Construction Revenue 11,635,059 $ 2,908,765 $ 5,257,927 $ 2,349,162 $ 80.8% 4,683,388 $ 574,539 $ Operating Costs Construction 53,000 $ 13,250 $ 7,582 $ 5,669 $ 42.8% 7,538 $ 44 $ Capital Construction Projects 31,490,284 $ 14,859,841 $ 3,757,090 $ 11,102,752 $ 74.7% 6,276,929 $ (2,519,839) $ Construction Income (Loss) (19,908,224) $ (11,964,327) $ 1,493,256 $ 13,457,583 $ (1,601,078) $ 3,094,334 $ 8 of 59 Enterprise Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 511 of 736 City of Meridian Enterprise Fund Graphs FY2019 for Month Ending 12/31/18 $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 YTD Utility Connection / Assessment Revenue Water Connection Revenue Sewer Connection Revenue Comparison is for same month each year 9 of 59 EnterGraphs Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 512 of 736 10 of 59 Utility Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 513 of 736 11 of 59 GeneralFund Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 514 of 736 12 of 59 GenFundGraphs Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 515 of 736 Total General Fund Revenue Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2019 for Month Ending 12/31/18 Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PYTD Variance $ Property Tax 33,540,850 $ 8,385,212 $ 23,048 $ 8,362,164 $ 100% 58,394 $ (35,346) $ Total Tax Revenue 33,540,850 $ 8,385,212 $ 23,048 $ 8,362,164 $ 100% 58,394 $ (35,346) $ Liquor License 75,000 $ 18,750 $ 1,325 $ 17,425 $ 93% 1,850 $ (525) $ Fire Inspections & Permits -$ -$ 2,678 $ (2,678) $ 3,422 $ (744) $ Dog License 50,000 $ 12,500 $ 6,561 $ 5,940 $ 48% 3,854 $ 2,707 $ Misc. License & Permits 15,000 $ 3,750 $ 1,089 $ 2,661 $ 71% 2,267 $ (1,178) $ Total License & Permit Revenue 140,000 $ 35,000 $ 11,653 $ 23,348 $ 67% 11,393 $ 260 $ Grant Revenue 1,042,018 $ 260,504 $ 317,990 $ (57,486) $ -22% 8,958 $ 309,032 $ State Revenue Sharing 6,671,294 $ 1,667,824 $ -$ 1,667,824 $ 100% -$ -$ State Liquor Revenue 995,406 $ 248,852 $ -$ 248,852 $ 100% -$ -$ Rural Fire 1,294,489 $ 323,622 $ 365,391 $ (41,769) $ -13% 368,077 $ (2,686) $ Meridian Development Corp 25,000 $ 6,250 $ 26,055 $ (19,805) $ -317% 16,000 $ 10,055 $ School Resources 423,516 $ 105,879 $ 234,253 $ (128,374) $ -121% 1,974 $ 232,280 $ Total Intergovernmental Revenue 10,451,723 $ 2,612,931 $ 943,690 $ 1,669,241 $ 64% 395,009 $ 548,681 $ Gas Franchise 700,000 $ 175,000 $ -$ 175,000 $ 100% -$ -$ Cable TV Franchise 200,000 $ 50,000 $ -$ 50,000 $ 100% -$ -$ Electricity Franchise 654,639 $ 163,660 $ -$ 163,660 $ 100% -$ -$ Total Franchise Revenue 1,554,639 $ 388,660 $ -$ 388,660 $ 100% -$ -$ Court Revenue 332,500 $ 83,125 $ 66,289 $ 16,836 $ 20% 72,336 $ (6,047) $ Fines, False Alarm, Restitution & Seizure 5,000$ 1,250 $ 14,430 $ (13,180) $ -1054% 16,683 $ (2,253) $ Total Fines & Forfeitures Revenue 337,500 $ 84,375 $ 80,719 $ 3,656 $ 4% 89,019 $ (8,300) $ Charges for Services by Department Fire -$ -$ 7,617 $ (7,617) $ 14,006 $ (6,390) $ Police 3,000 $ 750 $ 25,240 $ (24,490) $ -3265% 19,834 $ 5,407 $ Parks 978,990 $ 244,748 $ 194,048 $ 50,700 $ 21% 177,132 $ 16,915 $ Admin 109,000 $ 27,250 $ 49,004 $ (21,754) $ -80% 32,930 $ 16,074 $ Total Charges for Services Revenue 1,090,990 $ 272,747 $ 275,908 $ (3,161) $ -1% 243,902 $ 32,006 $ Impact Fees Impact Fees - Multifamily 314,349 $ 78,587 $ 635,355 $ (556,768) $ -708% 337,400 $ 297,955 $ Impact Fee - Commercial 80,000 $ 20,000 $ 200,704 $ (180,704) $ -904% 50,781 $ 149,923 $ Impact Fee - Residential 2,164,935 $ 541,234 $ 855,208 $ (313,974) $ -58% 699,934 $ 155,274 $ Total Impact Fee Revenue 2,559,284 $ 639,821 $ 1,691,267 $ (1,051,446) $ -164% 1,088,115 $ 603,152 $ Total Donations 38,410 $ 9,603 $ 8,397 $ 1,206 $ 13% 40,816 $ (32,419) $ Interest & Investment Earnings 217,000 $ 54,250 $ 383,835 $ (329,585) $ -608% 179,776 $ 204,059 $ Total Miscellaneous Revenues -$ -$ 20,031 $ (20,031) $ 7,483 $ 12,548 $ Total Revenue 49,930,396 $ 12,482,599 $ 3,438,549 $ 9,044,050 $ 72% 2,113,907 $ 1,324,642 $ Total General Fund Revenue does not include Community Development Permit Fee Revenue Budget To Actual Prior Year to Date 13 of 59 Revenue Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 516 of 736 City of Meridian Community Development Services Year End Change to Fund Balance Forecast FY2019 for Month Ending 12/31/2018 Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD Projected TOTAL DEV. SVCS. REVENUE Commercial Permits 1,345,570 $ 336,392 $ 470,380 $ 1,881,519 $ All other Permits 4,793,938 $ 1,198,485 $ 1,627,640 $ 6,510,559 $ Planning Revenue 413,657 $ 103,414 $ 94,610 $ 378,440 $ Miscellaneous Revenue -$ -$ 160 $ 640 $ Total Revenues 6,553,165 $ 1,638,291 $ 2,192,789 $ 8,771,157 $ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICE FUND Revenue 6,553,165 $ 1,638,291 $ 2,192,789 $ 8,771,157 $ PC 3,758,950 $ 939,738 $ 506,471 $ 2,025,883 $ OE 2,283,024 $ 682,858 $ 785,225 $ 3,140,899 $ Net Operating to Fund Balance 511,191 $ 15,695 $ 901,094 $ 3,604,375 $ CO & Interfund Transfers 564,353 $ 247,327 $ 191,634 $ 766,535 $ Total Change to Fund Balance (53,161) $ (231,632) $ 709,460 $ 2,837,841 $ FY2003 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $585,467 FY2004 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $799,548 FY2005 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,897,123 FY2006 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,815,539 FY2007 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,172,405 FY2008 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $0 FY2009 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $0 FY2010 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $0 FY2011 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $600,722 FY2012 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,044,914 FY2013 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,592,539 FY2014 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,391,676 FY2015 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $1,652,245 FY2016 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,275,054 FY2017 Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund $2,641,404 FY2018 TENTATIVE Transfer $3,354,153 TOTAL $23,822,789 Projected Transfer 14 of 59 CommDevForecast Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 517 of 736 City of Meridian Community Development - Building Department Only Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2019 for Month Ending 12/31/2018 Residential Permits Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PTYD Variance $ Building Permits 2,174,430 $ 543,608 $ 582,989 $ (39,381) $ -7% 573,584 $ 9,405 $ Plumbing Permits 540,296 $ 135,074 $ 165,159 $ (30,085) $ -22% 150,984 $ 14,175 $ Mechanical Permits 657,776 $ 164,444 $ 205,744 $ (41,300) $ -25% 158,820 $ 46,924 $ Electrical Permits 422,811 $ 105,703 $ 157,188 $ (51,486) $ -49% 107,315 $ 49,873 $ Fire Inspection Permits 457,614 $ 114,404 $ 180,139 $ (65,736) $ -57% 116,751 $ 63,388 $ Total Residential Permits 4,252,927 $ 1,063,232 $ 1,291,219 $ (227,987) $ -21% 1,107,454 $ 183,765 $ Multi-Family Permits 540,683 $ 135,171 $ 336,362 $ (201,191) $ -149% 181,966 $ 154,396 $ Commerical Permits 1,345,570 $ 336,392 $ 470,380 $ (133,987) $ -40% 251,831 $ 218,549 $ Total Building Permit Revenue 6,139,180 $ 1,534,795 $ 2,097,961 $ (563,166) $ -210% 1,541,251 $ 556,710 $ Budget to Actual Prior Year to Date City of Meridian Community Development Services Budget to Actual Year to Date Comparisons FY2019 for Month Ending 12/31/2018 Total Budget Total Budget YTD Actual YTD YTD Variance $ YTD Variance % PYTD Actual PYTD Variance $ ADMINISTRATION Personnel Costs 231,196 $ 57,799 $ 55,161 $ 2,638 $ 5% 14,551 $ 40,610 $ Operating Expenses 113,279 $ 28,320 $ 17,445 $ 10,875 $ 38% 15,178 $ 2,266 $ Total PC & OE 344,475 $ 86,119 $ 72,606 $ 13,513 $ 16% 29,730 $ 42,876 $ Interfund Transfers 93,898 $ 23,475 $ 16,864 $ 6,611 $ 28% 14,220 $ 2,644 $ Fund Balance Transfer 154,040 $ -$ -$ PLANNING Personnel Costs 838,217 $ 209,554 $ 173,450 $ 36,105 $ 17% 151,071 $ 22,378 $ Operating Expenses 262,543 $ 65,636 $ 43,382 $ 22,254 $ 34% 6,878 $ 36,504 $ Total PC and OE 1,100,760 $ 275,190 $ 216,832 $ 58,359 $ 21% 157,950 $ 58,882 $ BUILDING Personnel Costs 2,558,140 $ 639,535 $ 268,344 $ 371,191 $ 58% 118,051 $ 150,293 $ Operating Expenses 1,800,059 $ 450,015 $ 708,587 $ (258,572) $ -57% 590,239 $ 118,348 $ Total PC & OE 4,358,199 $ 1,089,550 $ 976,930 $ 112,620 $ 10% 708,290 $ 268,641 $ Capital Outlay 561,706 $ 140,427 $ 182,884 $ (42,457) $ -30% -$ 182,884 $ Interfund Transfers (63,182) $ (15,796) $ (14,726) $ (1,069) $ 7% (14,706) $ (20) $ ECONOMIC DEVLP Personnel Costs 131,397 $ 32,849 $ 9,516 $ 23,333 $ 71% 29,145 $ (19,629) $ Operating Expenses 164,100 $ 41,025 $ 15,811 $ 25,214 $ 61% 4,218 $ 11,593 $ Total PC & OE 295,497 $ 73,874 $ 25,328 $ 48,547 $ 66% 33,363 $ (8,036) $ Interfund Transfers 27,953 $ 6,988 $ 6,612 $ 376 $ 5% 6,737 $ (125) $ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICE FUND Personnel Costs 3,758,950 $ 939,738 $ 506,471 $ 433,267 $ 46% 312,818 $ 193,653 $ Operating Expenses 2,339,981 $ 584,996 $ 785,225 $ (200,229) $ -34% 616,514 $ 168,711 $ Total PC and OE 6,098,931 $ 1,524,733 $ 1,291,696 $ 233,038 $ 15% 929,332 $ 362,363 $ Capital Outlay 561,706 $ 140,427 $ 182,884 $ (42,457) $ -30% -$ 182,884 $ Interfund Transfers 58,669 $ 14,667 $ 8,750 $ 5,917 $ 40% 6,250 $ 2,500 $ Fund Balance Transfer 154,040 $ -$ -$ NOTE: Interfund Transfers = 25.42% of City Hall costs transfer to Community Development Services Budget to Actual Prior Year to Date Contracted Inspections $619K YTD 15 of 59 CommDevMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 518 of 736 16 of 59 CommDevGraphs Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 519 of 736 City of Meridian IMPACT FUND BALANCE as of 12/31/18 Account # Account Description Total Budget - Original Total Budget - Revised Current Year Actual Budget Remaining 2110 - Police Department REVENUES 34777 Impact Rev - Multifamily 29,336 $ -$ 70,245 $ (40,909) $ 34780 Commercial Impact Revenue 20,000 $ -$ 49,963 $ (29,963) $ 34781 Residential Impact Revenue 166,237 $ -$ 94,552 $ 71,685 $ 36100 Interest Earnings -$ -$ 9,179 $ (9,179) $ Total REVENUES 215,573 $ -$ 223,939 $ (8,366) $ 55000 Professional Services 6,170 $ (1,972) $ 2,265 $ 1,933 $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,170 $ (1,972) $ 2,265 $ 1,933 $ 2210 - Fire Department REVENUES 34777 Impact Rev - Multifamily 119,114 $ -$ 214,515 $ (95,401) $ 34780 Commercial Impact Revenue 60,000 $ -$ 150,741 $ (90,741) $ 34781 Residential Impact Revenue 674,978 $ -$ 288,744 $ 386,234 $ 36100 Interest Earnings -$ -$ 34,844 $ (34,844) $ Total REVENUES 854,092 $ -$ 688,845 $ 165,247 $ 54000 Equipment & Supplies -$ 20,000 $ -$ 20,000 $ 55000 Professional Services 18,840 $ (6,093) $ 7,002 $ 5,746 $ 92000 Cap Outlay - Bldgs & Structures 3,899,201 $ (218,615) $ 136,168 $ 3,544,418 $ 94120 Capital - Fire Trucks 660,995 $ (624,602) $ 10,865 $ 25,528 $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,579,036 $ (829,310) $ 154,035 $ 3,595,691 $ 5200 - Parks & Recreation REVENUES 34777 Impact Rev - Multifamily 165,899 $ -$ 350,595 $ (184,696) $ 34781 Residential Impact Revenue 1,323,720 $ -$ 471,912 $ 851,808 $ 36100 Interest Earnings 15,000 $ -$ 36,945 $ (21,945) $ Total REVENUES 1,504,619 $ -$ 859,452 $ 645,167 $ 55000 Professional Services 30,800 $ (9,856) $ 11,326 $ 9,617 $ 55102 Investment Services -$ -$ 572 $ (572) $ 93415 Borup Property construction 155,161 $ (86,419) $ 10,983 $ 57,759 $ 96927 Discovery Park 2,610,096 $ (1,779,951) $ 756,216 $ 73,929 $ 96929 Hillsdale Park Construction -$ -$ -$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,796,057 $ (1,876,227) $ 779,097 $ 140,734 $ TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES for FY2019 7,381,263 $ Dept FY2019 beginning fund balance FY2019 net change YTD Fund Balance YTD Police Department $ 1,855,202 221,673 $ 2,076,875 $ Fire Department $ 6,382,796 534,810 $ 6,917,606 $ Parks & Recreation $ 4,844,596 80,355 $ 4,924,951 $ TOTAL IMPACT FUND BALANCE 13,082,594 $ 836,838 $ 13,919,432 $ 17 of 59 ImpactFundMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 520 of 736 18 of 59 OT Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 521 of 736 City of Meridian Volunteer Hours FY2019 for Month Ending 12/31/2018 Prior MONTH Parks General Police Fire Mayor Comm Dev Clerk Total Year October 703 41 113 428 366 62 44 1,757 2,015 November 1,190 84 71 65 237 184 33 1,864 1,122 December 727 65 76 50 188 143 30 1,279 1,271 January February March April May June July August September TOTAL 2,620 190 260 543 791 389 107 4,900 4,408 GRAND TOTAL YTD 4,900 19 of 59 VolunteersMeridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 522 of 736 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n Va c a n c y R e p o r t J a n u a r y 7 , 2 0 1 9 Po s i t i o n Po s i t i o n Po s i t i o n Po s i t i o n Po s i t i o n Po s i t i o n Po s i t i o n Po s i t i o n Nu m b e r Nu m b e r Nu m b e r Nu m b e r FT E FT E F T E FT E F u n d Fu n d F u n d Fu n d D e p a r t m e n t De p a r t m e n t De p a r t m e n t De p a r t m e n t H R S t a t u s HR S t a t u s HR S t a t u s HR S t a t u s Po s i t i o n V a c a n t D a t e Po s i t i o n V a c a n t D a t e Po s i t i o n V a c a n t D a t e Po s i t i o n V a c a n t D a t e Position Posted Position Posted Position Posted Position Posted Date Date Date Date Position Start Position Start Position Start Position Start Date Date Date Date De v e l o p m e n t A n a l y s t I 5 2 2 1 E n t e r p r i s e P W N o R e q u e s t t o Fi l l a t T h i s T i m e N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 7 N o t y et requested Not yet filled GI S T e c h n i c i a n 3 0 2 1 E n t e r p r i s e P W Of f e r A c c e p t e d 9/ 2 1 / 2 0 1 8 9 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 8 1 / 1 4 / 2 0 1 9 So l i d W a s t e C o o r d i n a t o r 5 6 5 1 E n t e r p r i s e P W A c c e p t i n g A p pl i c a t i o n s ; I n t e r v i e w s i n P r o g r e s s N e w p o s i t i o n F Y 1 8 B u d g e t A m e n d m e n t 1 0 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d St a f f E n g i n e e r I I 3 1 5 1 E n t e r p r i s e P W A c c e p t i n g A p p l i c a t io n s 11 / 2 3 / 2 0 1 8 T B P 1 / 8 / 2 0 1 9 N o t y e t f i l l e d Me t e r T e c h n i c i a n I 2 1 4 1 E n t e r p r i s e P W - W a t e r O f f e r A c c e p te d 9/ 2 4 / 2 0 1 8 1 0 / 5 / 2 0 1 8 2 / 4 / 2 0 1 9 Co l l e c t i o n S y s t e m T e c h n i c i a n 3 2 3 1 E n t e r p r i s e P W - W W A c c e pt i n g A p p l i c a t i o n s 10 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 9 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Co l l e c t i o n S y s t e m T e c h n i c i a n 4 4 9 1 E n t e r p r i s e P W - W W A c c e pt i n g A p p l i c a t i o n s 9 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 8 9 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d In s t r u m e n t T e c h n i c i a n 5 6 2 1 E n t e r p r i s e P W - W W Of f e r A c c e p t e d Ne w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 8 8 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 8 1 / 1 4 / 2 0 1 9 Wa s t e w a t e r O p e r a t o r I I I 5 6 3 1 E n t e r p r i s e P W - W W A c c e p t i n g A p p l i c a t i o n s ; I n t e r v i e w s i n P r o g r e s s N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 8 8 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Ad m i n i s t r a t i v e A s s i s t a n t I - E l e c t r i c a l 5 4 6 1 G e n e r a l B ui l d i n g O n l y p o s t i n g f o r B u i l d i n g A d m i n i s t r a t i v e A s s is t a n t a t t h i s t i m e . N e w P o s i t i o n 0 5 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t requested Not yet filled Bu i l d i n g I n s p e c t i o n S u p e r v i s o r 5 3 4 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g R e qu e s t t o P o s t R e c e i v e d R e v i e w o f J o b D e s c r i p t io n i n P r o g r e s s 1 / 4 / 2 0 1 9 N o t y e t p o s t e d N o t y e t f i l l e d Bu i l d i n g I n s p e c t o r I 5 3 1 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g A c c e p t i n g A p pl i c a t i o n s ; I n t e r v i e w s i n P r o g r e s s N e w P o s i t i o n 0 5 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 8 5 / 9 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Bu i l d i n g I n s p e c t o r I 5 3 2 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g A c c e p t i n g A p pl i c a t i o n s ; I n t e r v i e w s i n P r o g r e s s N e w P o s i t i o n 0 5 / 0 8/ 2 0 1 8 5 / 9 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Bu i l d i n g P l a n s E x a m i n e r I 5 3 7 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g Of f e r A c c e p t e d Ne w P o s i t i o n 0 5 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 8 5 / 9 / 2 0 1 8 1 / 7 / 2 0 1 9 Bu i l d i n g P l a n s E x a m i n e r I I 5 3 8 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g A c c e p t in g A p p l i c a t i o n s ; I n t e r v i e w s i n P r o g r e s s N e w P o s i t i o n 0 5 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 8 5 / 9 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d El e c t r i c a l I n s p e c t o r I 5 4 2 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g Of f e r A c c e p t e d Ne w P o s i t i o n 0 5 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 8 5 / 9 / 2 0 1 8 1 / 7 / 2 0 1 9 El e c t r i c a l I n s p e c t o r I 5 4 3 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g A c c e p t i n g Ap p l i c a t i o n s ; I n t e r v i e w s i n P r o g r e s s N e w P o s i t i o n 0 5 /0 8 / 2 0 1 8 5 / 9 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d El e c t r i c a l I n s p e c t o r I 5 4 4 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g A c c e p t i n g Ap p l i c a t i o n s ; I n t e r v i e w s i n P r o g r e s s N e w P o s i t i o n 0 5 /0 8 / 2 0 1 8 5 / 9 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d El e c t r i c a l P l a n s E x a m i n e r 5 3 9 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g A c c e p t i ng A p p l i c a t i o n s ; I n t e r v i e w s i n P r o g r e s s N e w P o s i t i o n 0 5 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 8 5 / 9 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d El e c t r i c a l P l a n s E x a m i n e r 5 4 0 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g A c c e p t i ng A p p l i c a t i o n s ; I n t e r v i e w s i n P r o g r e s s N e w P o s i t i o n 0 5 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 8 5 / 9 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Me c h a n i c a l I n s p e c t o r 5 6 7 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g Of f e r A c c e p t e d Ne w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 1 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 8 1 1 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 1 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 9 Me c h a n i c a l I n s p e c t o r 5 6 8 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g A c c e p t i n g A p pl i c a t i o n s N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 1 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 8 1 1 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 N o t yet filled Me c h a n i c a l I n s p e c t o r 5 6 9 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g A c c e p t i n g A p pl i c a t i o n s N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 1 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 8 1 1 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 N o t yet filled Me c h a n i c a l I n s p e c t o r 5 7 0 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g A c c e p t i n g A p pl i c a t i o n s N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 1 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 8 1 1 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 N o t yet filled Me c h a n i c a l S u p e r v i s o r 5 6 6 1 G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g A c c e p t i n g A pp l i c a t i o n s N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 1 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 8 1 1 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 N ot yet filled Di v i s i o n C h i e f - L o g i s t i c s 9 2 1 G e n e r a l F i r e A c c e p t i n g A pp l i c a t i o n s 12 / 2 8 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 / 2 8 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Fi r e F i g h t e r 2 5 0 1 G e n e r a l F i r e N o R e q u e s t t o F i l l a t T h is T i m e 6/ 2 1 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t r e q u e s t e d N o t y e t f i l l e d Fi r e F i g h t e r 2 7 1 1 G e n e r a l F i r e N o R e q u e s t t o F i l l a t T h is T i m e 6/ 2 1 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t r e q u e s t e d N o t y e t f i l l e d Fi r e F i g h t e r 2 7 3 1 G e n e r a l F i r e N o R e q u e s t t o F i l l a t T h is T i m e 4/ 2 1 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t r e q u e s t e d N o t y e t f i l l e d Fi r e F i g h t e r 3 7 7 1 G e n e r a l F i r e N o R e q u e s t t o F i l l a t T h is T i m e 8/ 3 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t r e q u e s t e d N o t y e t f i l l e d Fi r e F i g h t e r 3 7 8 1 G e n e r a l F i r e N o R e q u e s t t o F i l l a t T h is T i m e 7/ 2 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t r e q u e s t e d N o t y e t f i l l e d Ad m i n i s t r a t i v e A s s i s t a n t I - H u m a n R e s o u r c e s 2 9 9 1 G e n er a l H u m a n R e s o u r c e s A c c e p t i n g A p p l i c a t i o n s 1/ 1 8 / 2 0 1 9 1 2 / 2 8 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Hu m a n R e s o u r c e s G e n e r a l i s t 5 5 0 1 G e n e r a l H u m a n R e s o u r c e s A c c e p t i n g A p p l i c a t i o n s N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 8 12/18/2019 Not yet filled Ho m e c o u r t F a c i l i t y S p e c i a l i s t 5 5 2 1 G e n e r a l P a r k s R e o p e n in g R e c r u i t m e n t N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 8 1 / 8 / 2 0 1 9 Not yet filled Re c r e a t i o n C a m p C o o r d i n a t o r 5 0 7 0 . 5 G e n e r a l P a r k s A c c e p t in g A p p l i c a t i o n s 8/ 1 6 / 2 0 1 8 8 2 / 0 7 / 2 0 1 9 N o t y e t f i l l e d As s o c i a t e C i t y P l a n n e r ( C u r r e n t ) 2 4 1 1 G e n e r a l P l a n n i n g In t e r v i e w s I n P r o g r e s s 12 / 7 / 2 0 1 7 1 1 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Co m m u n i t y S e r v i c e O f f i c e r 5 5 7 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e I n t e r v i e w s S c h e d u l e d N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 8 1 0 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 8 N ot yet filled Co m m u n i t y S e r v i c e O f f i c e r 5 5 8 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e I n t e r v i e w s S c h e d u l e d N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 8 1 0 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 8 N ot yet filled Co m m u n i t y S e r v i c e O f f i c e r 5 5 9 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e I n t e r v i e w s S c h e d u l e d N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 8 1 0 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 8 N ot yet filled Co m m u n i t y S e r v i c e O f f i c e r 5 6 0 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e I n t e r v i e w s S c h e d u l e d N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 8 1 0 / 1 9 / 2 0 1 8 N ot yet filled NI B R S - C A U A n a l y s t 5 5 5 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e I n t e r v i e w s S c h e d u le d N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 8 1 1 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f illed NI B R S - C A U A n a l y s t 5 5 6 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e I n t e r v i e w s S c h e d u le d N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 8 1 1 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f illed Po l i c e O f f i c e r 3 2 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e Of f e r A c c e p t e d 10 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 7 1 1 / 1 6 / 2 0 1 7 1 2 / 3 / 2 0 1 8 Po l i c e O f f i c e r 3 3 6 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e Of f e r A c c e p t e d 10 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 7 1 1 / 1 6 / 2 0 1 7 4 / 8 / 2 0 1 9 Po l i c e O f f i c e r 3 4 1 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e B a c k g r o u n d I n P r o g r e ss ; T e s t i n g S c h e d u l e d ; O r a l B o a r d s S c h e d u l e d 3 / 1 5 / 2 0 18 5 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Po l i c e O f f i c e r 3 7 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e Of f e r A c c e p t e d 11 / 2 / 2 0 1 7 1 1 / 1 6 / 2 0 1 7 4 / 8 / 2 0 1 9 Po l i c e O f f i c e r 1 9 2 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e B a c k g r o u n d I n P r o g r e ss ; T e s t i n g S c h e d u l e d ; O r a l B o a r d s S c h e d u l e d 1 0 / 1 / 2 0 18 1 0 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Po l i c e O f f i c e r 5 1 1 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e B a c k g r o u n d I n P r o g r e ss ; T e s t i n g S c h e d u l e d ; O r a l B o a r d s S c h e d u l e d 9 / 2 2 / 2 0 18 1 0 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Po l i c e O f f i c e r 5 1 6 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e B a c k g r o u n d I n P r o g r e ss ; T e s t i n g S c h e d u l e d ; O r a l B o a r d s S c h e d u l e d 1 0 / 2 / 2 0 18 1 0 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Po l i c e O f f i c e r 9 1 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e B a c k g r o u n d I n P r o g r e s s; T e s t i n g S c h e d u l e d ; O r a l B o a r d s S c h e d u l e d 1 1 / 5 / 2 0 1 8 1 1 / 1 6 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d Pu b l i c I n f o r m a t i o n S a f e t y O f f i c e r 5 5 3 1 G e n e r a l P o l i c e R ep o s t e d P o s i t i o n ; A c c e p t i n g A p p l i c a t i o n s N e w P o s i t i o n a s o f 1 0 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 8 8 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d De v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t T e c h n i c i a n C o o r d i n a t o r 2 9 1 G e n e r a l PW A c c e p t i n g A p p l i c a t i o n s ; I n t e r v i e w s i n P r o g r e s s 1 0 / 1/ 2 0 1 8 1 1 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 8 N o t y e t f i l l e d T O T A L F T E T O T A L F T E T O T A L F T E T O T A L F T E 5 1 . 5 5 1 . 5 5 1 . 5 5 1 . 5 20 o f 5 9 VacantPositions Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 2 3 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n In t e r f u n d T r a n s f e r s FY 2 0 1 9 Ef f e c t i v e D a t e Ge n e r a l F u n d Enterprise Fund tr a n s f e r e x p e n s e t o E N T E R P R I S E F U N D ( w a t e r & s e w e r fu n d ) 15 % o f M a y o r ' s O f f i c e p e r s o n n e l c o s t s (e x c e p t M a y o r w a g e & b e n e f i t s ) t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 1 0 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 15 % o f C l e r k s e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 1 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 46 % o f F i n a n c e e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 1 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 46 % o f H R e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 1 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 46 % o f I T e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 1 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 46 % o f L e g a l e x p e n s e s t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 1 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 46 % o f I T C a p i t a l e x p e n s e t r a n s f e r t o E n t e r p r i s e F u d FY 2 0 1 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e tr a n s f e r C i t y H a l l c o s t s t o t h e f o l l o w i n g : 13 % F i r e D e p a r t m e n t i n t h e G e n e r a l F u n d FY 2 0 0 9 t r a n s f e r s a l l i n t h i s f u n d 8. 4 2 % P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n i n t h e G e n e r a l F u n d FY 2 0 0 9 t r a n s f e r s a l l i n t h i s f u n d 12 . 9 2 % C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t i n t h e G e n e r a l F u n d FY 2 0 0 9 t r a n s f e r s a l l i n t h i s f u n d 23 . 0 8 % P u b l i c W o r k s i n t h e E n t e r p r i s e F u n d FY 2 0 0 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e Pe r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r s : Bl d g D e p t M g r 5 0 % f r o m B u i l d i n g D e p a r t m e n t t o P u b l i c W o r k s F Y 2 0 0 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e Ca p i t a l P r o j e c t s M g r 2 5 % f r o m O t h e r G o v t t o P u b l i c W or k s FY 2 0 1 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e Co m m u n i c a t i o n s M g r 2 5 % f r o m O t h e r G o v t t o P u b l i c W o rk s FY 2 0 1 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e Ma y o r ' s A d m i n A s s t 5 0 % f r o m M a y o r ' s O f f i c e t o E c o n o m ic D e v e l o p m e n t F Y 2 0 1 5 t r a n s f e r s a l l i n t h i s f u n d St r a t e g i c A n a l y s t 2 5 % f r o m O t h e r G o v t t o P u b l i c W o r k s FY 2 0 1 9 ( r e d u c e s e x p e n s e ) i n c r e a s e s e x p e n s e 21 o f 5 9 Transfers Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 2 4 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Co u n c i l 1 1 2 0 - C o u n c i l Co u n c i l PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Co u n c i l A d m i n i s t r a t i v e W a g e s 6 0 , 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 8 3 1 5 , 2 5 0 4 4 , 7 5 0 7 4 . 5 8 % 1 5 , 2 5 0 Co u n c i l F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 4, 5 9 0 0 3 0 7 9 2 0 3 , 6 7 0 7 9 . 9 4 % 9 4 6 Co u n c i l P E R S I 7, 1 6 4 0 5 7 5 1 , 7 2 6 5 , 4 3 8 7 5 . 9 0 % 1 , 7 2 6 Co u n c i l W o r k e r s ' C o m p 10 8 0 0 0 1 0 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co u n c i l E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 9 1 , 1 8 8 0 1 8 0 6 6 0 9 0 , 5 2 8 9 9 . 2 7 % 1 8 , 5 7 0 Co u n c i l M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 5 , 7 9 2 1 7 , 3 7 5 (1 7 , 3 7 5 ) 0.00% 0 Co u n c i l V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 8 2 2 4 6 (2 4 6 ) 0.00% 0 Co u n c i l D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 5 4 9 1 , 6 4 8 (1 , 6 4 8 ) 0.00% 0 Co u n c i l L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 6 7 1 3 5 (1 3 5 ) 0.00% 0 Co u n c i l S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 3 2 7 (2 7 ) 0.00% 0 Co u n c i l L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 6 3 3 (3 3 ) 0.00% 0 Co u n c i l E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 23 47 (4 7 ) 0.00%0 Co u n c i l T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 16 3 , 0 5 0 0 12 , 6 8 9 38 , 0 6 7 12 4 , 9 8 3 76.65%36,492 Co u n c i l Co u n c i l OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Co u n c i l O f f i c e E x p e n s e 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co u n c i l E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 3 6 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 1 0 Co u n c i l C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co u n c i l P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 25 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co u n c i l R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 26 4 0 2 7 8 2 1 8 2 6 8 . 9 5 % 5 6 Co u n c i l B u s i n e s s M e a l s 3, 2 5 0 0 2 2 6 6 4 9 2 , 6 0 1 8 0 . 0 2 % 2 8 0 Co u n c i l M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co u n c i l E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 6 , 8 4 0 0 0 1 , 2 4 0 5 , 6 0 0 8 1 . 8 7 % 3 5 Co u n c i l T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 2 , 3 0 0 0 0 7 9 6 1 , 5 0 4 6 5 . 3 7 % 0 Co u n c i l T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 6, 5 0 8 0 0 2 , 0 3 2 4 , 4 7 6 6 8 . 7 7 % 0 Co u n c i l T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 1, 5 4 6 0 0 5 9 4 9 5 2 6 1 . 5 7 % 0 Co u n c i l H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 90 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co u n c i l E m p l o y e e L o n g e v i t y a w a r d s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%57 Co u n c i l T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 22 , 0 0 8 0 25 3 5, 3 9 4 16 , 6 1 4 75.49%639 Co u n c i l Co u n c i l DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 18 5 , 0 5 8 0 12 , 9 4 2 43 , 4 6 1 14 1 , 5 9 7 76.51%37,131 Co u n c i l Co u n c i l Co u n c i l TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 18 5 , 0 5 8 0 12 , 9 4 2 43 , 4 6 1 14 1 , 5 9 7 76.51%37,131 22 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 2 5 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Cl e r k 1 1 4 0 - C i t y C l e r k Cl e r k RE V E N U E S Cl e r k L i q u o r L i c e n s e R e v e n u e s 7 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 3 2 5 7 3 , 6 7 5 9 8 . 2 3 % 1 , 8 5 0 Cl e r k M i s c L i c e n s e s / P e r m i t s R e v e n u e s 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 1 , 0 8 9 1 3 , 9 1 1 9 2 . 7 4 % 2 , 2 6 7 Cl e r k P a s s p o r t R e v e n u e s 70 , 0 0 0 0 5, 4 9 5 18 , 8 3 0 51 , 1 7 0 73.09%16,375 Cl e r k T o t a l R E V E N U E S 16 0 , 0 0 0 0 5, 6 8 5 21 , 2 4 4 13 8 , 7 5 6 86.72%20,492 Cl e r k Cl e r k PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Cl e r k W a g e s 30 4 , 3 9 6 0 2 5 , 7 3 4 7 4 , 9 4 7 2 2 9 , 4 4 8 7 5 . 3 7 % 7 9 , 5 5 4 Cl e r k O v e r t i m e W a g e s 1, 0 9 9 0 0 0 1 , 0 9 9 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 7 9 Cl e r k F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 23 , 3 7 1 0 1 , 8 8 1 5 , 4 7 0 1 7 , 9 0 1 7 6 . 5 9 % 5 , 8 3 7 Cl e r k P E R S I 35 , 6 7 2 0 2 , 9 1 3 8 , 4 8 4 2 7 , 1 8 8 7 6 . 2 1 % 8 , 4 5 1 Cl e r k W o r k e r s ' C o m p 90 5 0 0 0 9 0 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 1 0 6 , 3 8 6 0 2 8 0 1 , 0 8 5 1 0 5 , 3 0 1 9 8 . 9 7 % 2 1 , 1 4 9 Cl e r k M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 5 , 7 2 2 1 7 , 1 6 6 (1 7 , 1 6 6 ) 0.00% 0 Cl e r k V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 7 3 2 2 0 (2 2 0 ) 0.00% 0 Cl e r k D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 4 6 3 1 , 3 8 8 (1 , 3 8 8 ) 0.00% 0 Cl e r k L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 7 8 1 5 7 (1 5 7 ) 0.00% 0 Cl e r k S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 6 7 1 3 1 (1 3 1 ) 0.00% 0 Cl e r k L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 8 1 1 5 9 (1 5 9 ) 0.00% 0 Cl e r k E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 27 54 (5 4 ) 0.00%0 Cl e r k T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 47 1 , 8 2 9 0 37 , 3 1 9 10 9 , 2 6 1 36 2 , 5 6 8 76.84%115,170 Cl e r k Cl e r k OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Cl e r k O f f i c e E x p e n s e 3, 8 0 0 0 1 0 1 , 1 2 4 2 , 6 7 6 7 0 . 4 2 % 5 2 0 Cl e r k C o p i e r E x p e n s e 1, 8 2 4 0 1 0 7 2 3 7 1 , 5 8 7 8 6 . 9 8 % 1 , 5 0 8 Cl e r k E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 4 2 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 Cl e r k C o d i f i c a t i o n E x p e n s e s 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 8 6 9 5 , 1 3 1 8 5 . 5 1 % 1 , 6 3 9 Cl e r k S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 7 , 9 6 0 0 0 9 , 7 0 9 8 , 2 5 1 4 5 . 9 4 % 2 , 5 1 9 Cl e r k E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 2 , 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 6 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 7 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 9 6 5 , 9 0 4 9 8 . 4 0 % 4 8 1 Cl e r k C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 20 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 3 7 0 5 , 0 4 8 1 4 , 9 5 2 7 4 . 7 6 % 5 , 3 8 4 Cl e r k P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 7, 0 0 0 0 5 7 4 1 , 9 1 0 5 , 0 9 0 7 2 . 7 1 % 1 , 5 3 1 Cl e r k B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 5 , 8 4 1 0 0 2 , 2 1 7 3 , 6 2 4 6 2 . 0 3 % 2 0 Cl e r k T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 3 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 2, 5 5 0 0 0 0 2 , 5 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 1, 2 5 6 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 6 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k L e g a l N o t i c e s 1, 0 0 0 0 1 2 5 3 7 9 6 2 0 6 2 . 0 4 % 6 0 3 Cl e r k D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 6 4 0 0 0 0 6 4 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 10 5 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 4 3 . 7 6 % 0 Cl e r k E l e c t i o n s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Cl e r k E m p l o y e e L o n g e v i t y a w a r d s 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%38 Cl e r k T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 88 , 6 9 6 0 2, 2 8 6 21 , 6 9 1 67 , 0 0 5 75.54%14,247 Cl e r k 23 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 2 6 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Cl e r k Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Cl e r k C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 7, 5 0 0 0 0 7, 9 2 0 (4 2 0 ) (5.59)%0 Cl e r k T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 7, 5 0 0 0 0 7, 9 2 0 (4 2 0 ) (5.60)%0 Cl e r k Cl e r k DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 56 8 , 0 2 5 0 39 , 6 0 6 13 8 , 8 7 2 42 9 , 1 5 3 75.55%129,417 Cl e r k Cl e r k Cl e r k Tr a n s f e r s Cl e r k P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (7 0 , 7 7 4 ) 0 (5 , 6 3 6 ) ( 1 6 , 4 2 8 ) ( 5 4 , 3 4 6 ) 76.78% 0 Cl e r k O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (1 3 , 3 0 5 ) 0 (1 7 9 ) (5 , 0 5 5 ) (8 , 2 5 0 ) 62.00%0 Cl e r k T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (8 4 , 0 7 9 ) 0 (5 , 8 1 6 ) (2 1 , 4 8 3 ) (6 2 , 5 9 6 ) 74.45%0 Cl e r k Cl e r k TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 48 3 , 9 4 6 0 33 , 7 9 0 11 7 , 3 8 9 36 6 , 5 5 7 75.74%129,417 24 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 2 7 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ma y o r 1 3 1 0 - M a y o r ' s O f f i c e Ma y o r RE V E N U E S Ma y o r R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 Ma y o r C o m m u n i t y E v e n t R e v / S p o n s o r s h i p 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 3 , 5 0 0 1 5 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 % 1 1 , 5 0 0 Ma y o r D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 (4 , 0 0 0 ) 0.00%24,352 Ma y o r T o t a l R E V E N U E S 20 , 0 0 0 0 13 , 5 0 0 19 , 0 0 0 1, 0 0 0 5.00%35,854 Ma y o r Ma y o r PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Ma y o r A d m i n i s t r a t i v e W a g e s 9 0 , 9 5 8 0 7 , 5 8 0 2 2 , 7 3 9 6 8 , 2 1 9 7 5 . 0 0 % 2 2 , 7 3 9 Ma y o r W a g e s 22 4 , 7 3 4 0 1 8 , 7 5 1 5 5 , 5 0 2 1 6 9 , 2 3 2 7 5 . 3 0 % 5 4 , 6 5 9 Ma y o r O v e r t i m e W a g e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 5 Ma y o r F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 24 , 1 5 0 0 1 , 9 2 4 5 , 7 0 5 1 8 , 4 4 5 7 6 . 3 7 % 5 , 6 6 6 Ma y o r P E R S I 37 , 6 9 4 0 2 , 9 8 1 8 , 8 5 7 2 8 , 8 3 7 7 6 . 5 0 % 8 , 7 6 5 Ma y o r W o r k e r s ' C o m p 1, 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 , 1 3 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 7 5 , 9 9 0 0 1 4 5 6 5 7 7 5 , 3 3 3 9 9 . 1 3 % 1 8 , 1 0 7 Ma y o r M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 5 , 4 6 8 1 6 , 7 9 0 (1 6 , 7 9 0 ) 0.00% 0 Ma y o r V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 7 1 2 1 9 (2 1 9 ) 0.00% 0 Ma y o r D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 4 3 2 1 , 3 2 7 (1 , 3 2 7 ) 0.00% 0 Ma y o r L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 5 6 1 1 2 (1 1 2 ) 0.00% 0 Ma y o r S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 6 5 1 3 0 (1 3 0 ) 0.00% 0 Ma y o r L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 8 4 1 6 6 (1 6 6 ) 0.00% 0 Ma y o r E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 19 39 (3 9 ) 0.00%0 Ma y o r T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 45 4 , 6 5 6 0 37 , 5 7 6 11 2 , 2 4 3 34 2 , 4 1 3 75.31%109,972 Ma y o r Ma y o r OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Ma y o r O f f i c e E x p e n s e 2, 1 5 0 0 3 4 1 7 5 1 , 9 7 5 9 1 . 8 3 % 3 4 4 Ma y o r C o p i e r E x p e n s e 2, 4 0 0 0 1 0 4 8 7 3 1 , 5 2 7 6 3 . 6 3 % 4 6 4 Ma y o r E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 8 Ma y o r F u e l s - G a s 1, 1 0 0 0 8 3 2 2 2 8 7 8 7 9 . 7 8 % 8 7 Ma y o r C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 1, 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 9 8 Ma y o r C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 8 , 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 8 , 0 8 9 9 7 . 4 6 % 8 6 Ma y o r V e h i c l e R e p a i r 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 50 0 0 0 2 3 4 7 7 9 5 . 4 0 % 4 1 Ma y o r S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 29 5 0 0 3 1 4 (1 9 ) (6.40)% 299 Ma y o r E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 5 0 0 0 0 1 9 4 8 1 9 6 . 1 9 % 0 Ma y o r F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 1 , 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 6 3 Ma y o r P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1, 2 5 0 0 1 5 8 5 1 , 1 6 5 9 3 . 2 1 % 7 3 Ma y o r R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 26 4 0 2 7 8 2 1 8 2 6 8 . 9 5 % 5 0 Ma y o r C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 78 0 0 5 2 1 5 6 6 2 4 7 9 . 9 3 % 4 5 7 Ma y o r B u s i n e s s M e a l s 2, 8 5 0 0 3 7 8 5 4 3 2 , 3 0 7 8 0 . 9 3 % 1 9 7 Ma y o r M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 2 5 0 0 3 6 6 5 1 8 5 7 3 . 9 9 % 3 9 Ma y o r E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 7 , 9 7 3 0 0 2 0 6 7 , 7 6 7 9 7 . 4 1 % 2 0 5 Ma y o r T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 6 , 1 5 0 0 0 0 6 , 1 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 2 2 7 Ma y o r T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 7, 5 9 0 0 0 0 7 , 5 9 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 8 4 Ma y o r T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 1, 8 3 0 0 0 0 1 , 8 3 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 6 7 Ma y o r A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 25 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 2 8 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ma y o r P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 60 0 0 4 6 9 0 5 1 0 8 4 . 9 5 % 1 0 0 Ma y o r I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 0 0 0 5 0 (5 0 ) 0.00% 0 Ma y o r B l d g & S t r u c t u r e s R e n t a l & L e a s e 3 5 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ma y o r D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 5 3 4 0 3 6 0 7 5 1 (2 1 7 ) (40.57)% 170 Ma y o r H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 75 0 6 1 6 1 1 4 1 8 . 7 6 % 7 8 Ma y o r V o l u n t e e r e x p e n s e 55 0 0 10 1 10 1 44 9 81.56%0 Ma y o r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 55 , 2 9 1 0 1, 2 9 7 4, 0 2 8 51 , 2 6 3 92.71%6,138 Ma y o r Ma y o r DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 50 9 , 9 4 7 0 38 , 8 7 3 11 6 , 2 7 1 39 3 , 6 7 6 77.19%116,110 Ma y o r Ma y o r Tr a n s f e r s Ma y o r P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (7 7 , 5 3 0 ) 0 (6 , 2 6 1 ) ( 1 8 , 6 7 0 ) ( 5 8 , 8 6 0 ) 75.91%(19,502) Ma y o r O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (3 , 9 3 8 ) 0 0 0 (3 , 9 3 8 ) 100.00%0 Ma y o r T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (8 1 , 4 6 8 ) 0 (6 , 2 6 1 ) (1 8 , 6 7 0 ) (6 2 , 7 9 8 ) 77.08%(19,502) Ma y o r Ma y o r TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 42 8 , 4 7 9 0 32 , 6 1 2 97 , 6 0 1 33 0 , 8 7 8 77.22%96,607 26 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 2 9 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi n a n c e 1 5 0 0 - F i n a n c e D e p a r t m e n t Fi n a n c e PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Fi n a n c e W a g e s 72 6 , 1 6 6 0 6 0 , 5 6 4 1 7 8 , 6 9 9 5 4 7 , 4 6 7 7 5 . 3 9 % 1 4 8 , 3 1 9 Fi n a n c e O v e r t i m e W a g e s 0 0 5 2 2 1 , 1 8 3 (1 , 1 8 3 ) 0.00% 87 Fi n a n c e F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 55 , 5 5 2 0 4 , 4 6 9 1 3 , 1 5 0 4 2 , 4 0 2 7 6 . 3 2 % 1 0 , 8 6 7 Fi n a n c e P E R S I 86 , 7 0 4 0 6 , 9 1 5 2 0 , 3 6 3 6 6 , 3 4 1 7 6 . 5 1 % 1 6 , 8 0 0 Fi n a n c e W o r k e r s ' C o m p 2, 8 5 2 0 0 0 2 , 8 5 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 1 6 7 , 1 7 8 0 4 1 0 1 , 7 3 2 1 6 5 , 4 4 6 9 8 . 9 6 % 2 8 , 0 5 9 Fi n a n c e M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 1 , 1 3 4 3 3 , 4 0 1 (3 3 , 4 0 1 ) 0.00% 0 Fi n a n c e V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 1 4 3 4 2 8 (4 2 8 ) 0.00% 0 Fi n a n c e D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 8 8 1 2 , 6 4 3 (2 , 6 4 3 ) 0.00% 0 Fi n a n c e L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 3 5 2 7 1 (2 7 1 ) 0.00% 0 Fi n a n c e S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 4 8 2 9 1 (2 9 1 ) 0.00% 0 Fi n a n c e L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 8 7 3 6 8 (3 6 8 ) 0.00% 0 Fi n a n c e E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 43 86 (8 6 ) 0.00%0 Fi n a n c e T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 1, 0 3 8 , 4 5 2 0 85 , 5 5 0 25 2 , 6 1 4 78 5 , 8 3 8 75.67%204,132 Fi n a n c e OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Fi n a n c e O f f i c e E x p e n s e 5, 4 0 0 0 1 0 8 7 7 4 4 , 6 2 6 8 5 . 6 7 % 8 9 8 Fi n a n c e E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 6 6 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 4 2 Fi n a n c e S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 9 7 , 7 4 5 0 0 3 3 , 7 6 7 6 3 , 9 7 8 6 5 . 4 5 % 2 5 , 6 1 0 Fi n a n c e E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 4 5 0 0 0 0 4 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 , 9 6 6 Fi n a n c e C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 4 , 6 5 0 0 0 0 4 , 6 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e A u d i t & A c c o u n t i n g S e r v i c e s 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e I n v e s t m e n t S e r v i c e s 18 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 3 7 0 4 , 0 9 8 1 3 , 9 0 3 7 7 . 2 3 % 4 , 0 7 6 Fi n a n c e P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 2, 8 0 0 0 1 9 8 7 1 4 2 , 0 8 6 7 4 . 4 8 % 6 4 0 Fi n a n c e C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 0 Fi n a n c e B u s i n e s s M e a l s 64 0 0 0 1 3 6 2 7 9 7 . 9 6 % 0 Fi n a n c e M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 2 0 0 0 4 5 5 7 1 4 3 7 1 . 5 0 % 5 5 Fi n a n c e E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 2 , 9 5 5 0 3 0 0 4 , 6 0 7 8 , 3 4 8 6 4 . 4 4 % 2 , 3 3 7 Fi n a n c e T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 3 , 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 7 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 5, 3 5 0 0 0 0 5 , 3 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 2, 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 0 0 0 1 0 (1 0 ) 0.00% 0 Fi n a n c e L e g a l N o t i c e s 6, 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi n a n c e P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 5, 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 1 7 Fi n a n c e D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 2 , 3 4 8 0 0 1 , 2 9 0 1 , 0 5 8 4 5 . 0 6 % 6 4 0 Fi n a n c e H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 16 5 0 1 2 8 1 2 8 3 7 2 2 . 3 2 % 1 6 5 Fi n a n c e B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 0 0 0 46 (4 6 ) 0.00%52 Fi n a n c e T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 21 8 , 5 6 3 0 2, 1 4 9 45 , 5 0 3 17 3 , 0 6 0 79.18%39,149 Fi n a n c e Fi n a n c e DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 2 5 7 , 0 1 5 0 87 , 6 9 9 29 8 , 1 1 7 95 8 , 8 9 8 76.28%243,281 Fi n a n c e Tr a n s f e r s Fi n a n c e P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (4 7 7 , 6 8 8 ) 0 (3 9 , 3 5 3 ) ( 1 1 6 , 2 0 2 ) ( 3 6 1 , 4 8 6 ) 75.67%(102,066) Fi n a n c e O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (1 0 0 , 5 3 9 ) 0 (3 5 8 ) (2 1 , 0 4 5 ) (7 9 , 4 9 4 ) 79.06%(17,536) Fi n a n c e T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (5 7 8 , 2 2 7 ) 0 (3 9 , 7 1 1 ) (1 3 7 , 2 4 7 ) (4 4 0 , 9 8 0 ) 76.26%(119,603) Fi n a n c e Fi n a n c e TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 67 8 , 7 8 8 0 47 , 9 8 8 16 0 , 8 7 0 51 7 , 9 1 8 76.30%123,679 27 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 3 0 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual IT 1 5 1 0 - I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y IT RE V E N U E S IT R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 8 , 7 0 4 (8 , 7 0 4 ) 0.00% 0 IT C a s h D o n a t i o n f o r C a p i t a l O u t l a y 0 0 (8 , 7 0 0 ) (8 , 7 0 0 ) 8, 7 0 0 0.00%0 IT T o t a l R E V E N U E S 0 0 (8 , 7 0 0 ) 4 (4)0.00%0 IT IT PE R S O N N E L C O S T S IT W a g e s 1, 0 3 2 , 7 9 2 0 8 6 , 6 9 1 2 5 4 , 6 9 1 7 7 8 , 1 0 1 7 5 . 3 3 % 2 2 9 , 8 6 0 IT W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 1 9 , 2 0 0 0 8 1 4 2 , 7 4 7 1 6 , 4 5 3 8 5 . 6 9 % 3 , 9 0 3 IT O v e r t i m e W a g e s 22 , 2 3 0 0 1 , 2 3 4 3 , 9 1 2 1 8 , 3 1 8 8 2 . 4 0 % 2 , 9 5 3 IT F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 82 , 1 7 8 0 6 , 3 9 9 1 8 , 8 2 3 6 3 , 3 5 5 7 7 . 0 9 % 1 7 , 0 3 2 IT P E R S I 12 5 , 9 7 0 0 9 , 9 5 3 2 9 , 2 7 4 9 6 , 6 9 6 7 6 . 7 6 % 2 6 , 1 8 3 IT W o r k e r s ' C o m p 4, 6 1 9 0 0 0 4 , 6 1 9 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 2 4 3 , 1 6 8 0 5 2 0 2 , 2 6 7 2 4 0 , 9 0 1 9 9 . 0 6 % 5 1 , 5 2 4 IT M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 8 , 0 9 6 5 4 , 2 8 8 (5 4 , 2 8 8 ) 0.00% 0 IT V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 2 2 3 6 6 9 (6 6 9 ) 0.00% 0 IT D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 , 3 8 7 4 , 1 6 2 (4 , 1 6 2 ) 0.00% 0 IT L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 8 0 3 5 9 (3 5 9 ) 0.00% 0 IT S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 1 6 4 2 1 (4 2 1 ) 0.00% 0 IT L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 6 9 5 2 6 (5 2 6 ) 0.00% 0 IT E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 66 13 2 (1 3 2 ) 0.00%0 IT T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 1, 5 3 0 , 1 5 7 0 12 6 , 0 4 7 37 2 , 2 7 2 1, 1 5 7 , 8 8 5 75.67%331,454 IT IT OP E R A T I N G C O S T S IT O f f i c e E x p e n s e 1, 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 6 2 8 3 7 8 3 . 7 5 % 1 1 7 IT C o p i e r E x p e n s e 2, 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 4 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 1 , 1 4 0 0 0 9 2 1 , 0 4 8 9 1 . 9 3 % 2 0 6 IT S a f e t y E x p e n s e 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT F u e l s - G a s 70 0 0 5 7 1 3 3 5 6 7 8 0 . 9 4 % 1 2 8 IT B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 6, 0 0 0 (6 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT V e h i c l e R e p a i r 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 50 0 0 0 8 4 9 2 9 8 . 4 0 % 0 IT S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 5 2 , 9 9 6 0 2 4 , 9 6 6 7 6 , 4 1 1 7 6 , 5 8 5 5 0 . 0 5 % 5 1 , 7 1 3 IT E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 10 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 9 0 . 0 1 % 3 7 IT E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 7 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 3 , 4 1 1 3 8 , 5 1 5 3 1 , 4 8 5 4 4 . 9 7 % 2 , 0 3 4 IT S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 20 2 , 0 6 1 0 1 2 2 , 4 2 5 1 2 5 , 1 4 4 7 6 , 9 1 7 3 8 . 0 6 % 6 , 6 1 4 IT F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 4 , 1 5 0 0 1 , 4 6 8 1 , 4 6 8 2 , 6 8 3 6 4 . 6 3 % 0 IT P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 16 , 8 0 0 0 2 , 6 7 7 4 , 4 4 2 1 2 , 3 5 8 7 3 . 5 5 % 3 , 8 1 7 IT P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 20 0 0 1 5 8 6 1 1 4 5 7 . 1 8 % 1 4 IT R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 1 , 4 4 0 0 1 0 8 3 3 0 1 , 1 1 0 7 7 . 0 8 % 4 3 1 IT C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 4, 8 0 0 0 3 7 1 1 , 1 1 3 3 , 6 8 7 7 6 . 8 1 % 7 9 4 IT B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 7 5 0 0 5 7 1 9 4 . 0 0 % 3 2 IT E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 3 6 , 4 1 2 0 3 6 2 , 0 9 9 3 4 , 3 1 3 9 4 . 2 3 % 6 5 0 IT T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 8 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 5, 6 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 6 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 IT T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 2, 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 4 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 28 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 3 1 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual IT D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 5 0 0 0 0 1 6 4 8 4 9 6 . 8 3 % 0 IT H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 28 5 0 24 7 24 7 38 13.39%285 IT T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 56 8 , 3 5 9 (6 , 0 0 0 ) 17 5 , 8 0 2 25 1 , 6 7 9 31 0 , 6 8 0 55.25%66,870 IT IT Ca p i t a l O u t l a y IT C a p i t a l - C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s 1 2 2 , 5 0 0 0 1 0 4 , 9 8 7 1 0 8 , 2 3 6 1 4 , 2 6 4 1 1 . 6 4 % 3 7 9 , 9 9 7 IT C a p i t a l - C o m m u n i c a t i o n E q u i p m e n t 7 5 , 6 0 0 (2 6 , 1 1 0 ) 0 0 49 , 4 9 0 100.00%0 IT T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 19 8 , 1 0 0 (2 6 , 1 1 0 ) 10 4 , 9 8 7 10 8 , 2 3 6 63 , 7 5 3 37.07%379,997 IT IT DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 2, 2 9 6 , 6 1 7 (3 2 , 1 1 0 ) 40 6 , 8 3 6 73 2 , 1 8 7 1, 5 3 2 , 3 1 9 67.66%778,321 IT IT Tr a n s f e r s IT P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (7 0 3 , 8 7 2 ) 0 (5 7 , 9 8 2 ) ( 1 7 1 , 2 4 5 ) ( 5 3 2 , 6 2 7 ) 75.67%(165,727) IT O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (3 3 9 , 4 1 6 ) 0 (1 2 9 , 1 6 3 ) (1 8 5 , 9 8 4 ) (1 5 3 , 4 3 2 ) 45.20%(223,328) IT T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (1 , 0 4 3 , 2 8 8 ) 0 (1 8 7 , 1 4 5 ) (3 5 7 , 2 2 9 ) (6 8 6 , 0 5 9 ) 65.76%(389,054) IT IT TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 2 5 3 , 3 2 8 (3 2 , 1 1 0 ) 21 9 , 6 9 2 37 4 , 9 5 8 84 6 , 2 6 0 69.29%389,267 29 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 3 2 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Le g a l 1 5 2 0 - L e g a l D e p t Le g a l PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Le g a l W a g e s 53 6 , 6 7 3 0 4 4 , 2 1 3 1 3 0 , 6 2 2 4 0 6 , 0 5 1 7 5 . 6 6 % 1 2 7 , 4 8 1 Le g a l F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 41 , 0 5 5 0 3 , 1 8 4 9 , 5 1 7 3 1 , 5 3 8 7 6 . 8 1 % 9 , 3 1 7 Le g a l P E R S I 64 , 0 4 8 0 5 , 0 0 5 1 4 , 7 8 6 4 9 , 2 6 2 7 6 . 9 1 % 1 4 , 4 3 1 Le g a l W o r k e r s ' C o m p 95 7 0 0 0 9 5 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 7 5 , 9 9 0 0 1 8 5 8 5 5 7 5 , 1 3 5 9 8 . 8 7 % 1 5 , 5 7 2 Le g a l M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 4 , 6 9 6 1 4 , 0 8 8 (1 4 , 0 8 8 ) 0.00% 0 Le g a l V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 6 5 1 9 6 (1 9 6 ) 0.00% 0 Le g a l D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 4 1 3 1 , 2 3 8 (1 , 2 3 8 ) 0.00% 0 Le g a l L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 6 8 1 3 7 (1 3 7 ) 0.00% 0 Le g a l S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 9 0 1 8 0 (1 8 0 ) 0.00% 0 Le g a l L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 2 4 2 4 7 (2 4 7 ) 0.00% 0 Le g a l E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 19 39 (3 9 ) 0.00%0 Le g a l T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 71 8 , 7 2 3 0 58 , 0 6 3 17 1 , 9 0 6 54 6 , 8 1 7 76.08%166,801 Le g a l Le g a l OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Le g a l O f f i c e E x p e n s e 2, 5 0 0 0 0 2 8 2 , 4 7 2 9 8 . 8 9 % 1 4 4 Le g a l E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1, 1 8 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 5 (7 5 ) (6.39)% 1,196 Le g a l E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 2 , 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 5 0 0 Le g a l L e g a l S e r v i c e s 30 , 0 0 0 0 0 9 , 8 2 0 2 0 , 1 8 0 6 7 . 2 6 % 7 2 0 Le g a l P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 15 0 0 1 5 1 4 5 9 6 . 3 7 % 6 Le g a l R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 48 0 0 7 8 1 8 7 2 9 3 6 1 . 0 0 % 5 6 Le g a l C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1, 0 0 8 0 8 4 2 5 2 7 5 6 7 5 . 0 0 % 2 5 2 Le g a l B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 3 8 6 2 6 2 . 2 9 % 0 Le g a l M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 2 4 6 5 4 5 3 . 7 3 % 1 8 Le g a l E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 4 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 3 7 8 2 , 6 2 2 6 5 . 5 3 % 8 3 0 Le g a l T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 5 9 Le g a l T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1, 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 8 3 8 Le g a l T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 6 7 Le g a l P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Le g a l D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 1 0 , 1 6 2 0 6 1 , 3 4 6 8 , 8 1 6 8 6 . 7 5 % 1 , 3 3 6 Le g a l H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 75 0 73 73 2 3.09%44 Le g a l T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 65 , 7 5 5 0 24 4 14 , 4 2 9 51 , 3 2 6 78.06%9,465 Le g a l Le g a l DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 78 4 , 4 7 8 0 58 , 3 0 7 18 6 , 3 3 4 59 8 , 1 4 3 76.24%176,267 Le g a l Le g a l Tr a n s f e r s Le g a l P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (3 3 0 , 6 1 3 ) 0 (2 6 , 7 0 9 ) ( 7 9 , 0 7 7 ) ( 2 5 1 , 5 3 6 ) 76.08%(83,401) Le g a l O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (3 0 , 2 4 7 ) 0 (1 1 2 ) (2 , 0 2 8 ) (2 8 , 2 1 9 ) 93.29%(4,733) Le g a l T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (3 6 0 , 8 6 0 ) 0 (2 6 , 8 2 1 ) (8 1 , 1 0 5 ) (2 7 9 , 7 5 5 ) 77.52%(88,133) Le g a l Le g a l TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 42 3 , 6 1 8 0 31 , 4 8 6 10 5 , 2 3 0 31 8 , 3 8 8 75.15%88,133 30 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 3 3 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual HR 1 5 4 0 - H u m a n R e s o u r c e s HR RE V E N U E S HR R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 4 22 (2 2 ) 0.00%10 HR T o t a l R E V E N U E S 0 0 4 22 (2 2 ) 0.00%10 HR HR PE R S O N N E L C O S T S HR W a g e s 34 7 , 6 1 8 0 2 5 , 3 9 9 7 3 , 8 7 5 2 7 3 , 7 4 4 7 8 . 7 4 % 6 6 , 5 4 3 HR W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR O v e r t i m e W a g e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 3 HR F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 28 , 1 2 2 0 1 , 8 0 7 5 , 2 4 1 2 2 , 8 8 1 8 1 . 3 6 % 4 , 7 7 2 HR P E R S I 41 , 2 3 3 0 2 , 8 7 5 8 , 3 6 3 3 2 , 8 7 0 7 9 . 7 1 % 7 , 5 4 1 HR W o r k e r s ' C o m p 2, 0 8 8 0 0 0 2 , 0 8 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 1 6 6 , 1 8 8 0 1 0 , 2 0 0 1 3 , 1 4 7 1 5 3 , 0 4 1 9 2 . 0 8 % 3 2 , 1 9 5 HR M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 5 , 4 4 8 1 6 , 3 4 5 (1 6 , 3 4 5 ) 0.00% 0 HR V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 6 8 2 0 3 (2 0 3 ) 0.00% 0 HR D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 4 1 1 , 0 2 2 (1 , 0 2 2 ) 0.00% 0 HR L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 5 6 1 1 3 (1 1 3 ) 0.00% 0 HR S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 6 1 1 2 0 (1 2 0 ) 0.00% 0 HR L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 7 8 1 5 2 (1 5 2 ) 0.00% 0 HR E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 23 47 (4 7 ) 0.00%0 HR T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 60 5 , 2 4 9 0 46 , 3 5 7 11 8 , 6 2 7 48 6 , 6 2 2 80.40%111,124 HR HR OP E R A T I N G C O S T S HR O f f i c e E x p e n s e 5, 0 0 0 0 1 8 8 1 , 0 3 3 3 , 9 6 7 7 9 . 3 3 % 1 , 1 0 5 HR C o p i e r E x p e n s e 4, 8 0 0 0 0 1 , 4 4 0 3 , 3 6 0 6 9 . 9 9 % 1 , 3 5 4 HR E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 3 6 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 0 HR S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 8 , 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 4 6 (2 , 0 4 6 ) (11.36)% 13,983 HR E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 2 HR F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 7 , 4 5 0 0 0 0 7 , 4 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 6 0 , 1 5 0 0 0 9 9 0 5 9 , 1 6 0 9 8 . 3 5 % 0 HR B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 1 1 , 5 0 0 0 2 1 8 1 , 2 3 3 1 0 , 2 6 7 8 9 . 2 7 % 2 , 8 9 1 HR T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 45 0 0 0 0 4 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 40 0 0 1 8 3 4 3 6 6 9 1 . 4 7 % 6 3 HR R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 48 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 2, 6 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 3 0 2 , 2 7 0 8 7 . 3 0 % 3 3 0 HR B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 8 5 8 4 . 9 9 % 1 2 HR E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 4 , 0 9 9 0 0 1 , 1 2 3 1 2 , 9 7 5 9 2 . 0 3 % 3 7 5 HR T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 5 5 , 8 2 8 0 7 , 3 1 2 1 1 , 1 3 9 4 4 , 6 8 9 8 0 . 0 4 % 8 , 0 2 7 HR W e l l n e s s P r o g r a m 17 , 0 0 0 0 8 9 9 4 , 8 0 6 1 2 , 1 9 4 7 1 . 7 2 % 3 , 0 4 0 HR A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 2 , 0 3 0 1 7 , 9 7 0 8 9 . 8 5 % 4 , 5 5 5 HR P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 1, 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 9 9 0 9 8 . 9 9 % 0 HR D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 9 , 2 8 2 0 2 , 3 0 0 2 , 9 7 8 6 , 3 0 4 6 7 . 9 1 % 3 , 7 7 2 HR H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 90 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 HR E m p l o y e e E d u c a t i o n R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 4 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 4 8 0 2 , 4 8 0 1 1 , 5 2 0 8 2 . 2 8 % 3 , 9 9 0 31 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 3 4 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual HR E m p l o y e e L o n g e v i t y a w a r d s 5 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 5, 5 0 0 100.00%236 HR T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 25 6 , 1 8 9 0 14 , 1 4 5 49 , 6 8 8 20 6 , 5 0 1 80.60%43,835 HR HR Ca p i t a l O u t l a y HR C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 7, 5 0 0 0 0 0 7, 5 0 0 100.00%0 HR T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 7, 5 0 0 0 0 0 7, 5 0 0 100.00%0 HR HR DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 86 8 , 9 3 8 0 60 , 5 0 2 16 8 , 3 1 5 70 0 , 6 2 3 80.62%154,958 HR HR Tr a n s f e r s HR P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (2 4 3 , 9 1 5 ) 0 (2 1 , 3 2 4 ) ( 5 3 , 4 9 3 ) ( 1 9 0 , 4 2 2 ) 78.06%(55,562) HR O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (1 1 2 , 7 8 7 ) 0 (6 , 5 0 7 ) (2 3 , 2 7 7 ) (8 9 , 5 1 0 ) 79.36%(21,909) HR T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (3 5 6 , 7 0 2 ) 0 (2 7 , 8 3 1 ) (7 6 , 7 6 9 ) (2 7 9 , 9 3 3 ) 78.48%(77,471) HR HR TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 51 2 , 2 3 6 0 32 , 6 7 1 91 , 5 4 6 42 0 , 6 9 0 82.12%77,488 32 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 3 5 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ot h G o v 1 8 4 0 - O t h e r G o v t / S t L i g h t i n g Ot h G o v RE V E N U E S Ot h G o v G e n e r a l P r o p e r t y T a x R e v e n u e 3 3 , 5 4 0 , 8 5 0 0 4 , 3 4 4 2 3 , 0 4 8 3 3 , 5 1 7 , 8 0 2 9 9 . 9 3 % 5 8 , 3 9 4 Ot h G o v G a s F r a n c h i s e R e v e n u e 7 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v C a b l e T V F r a n c h i s e R e v e n u e 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v E l e c t r i c i t y F r a n c h i s e R e v e n u e 6 5 4 , 6 3 9 0 0 0 6 5 4 , 6 3 9 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v G r a n t R e v e n u e s 0 5 6 0 , 0 1 1 3 1 3 , 2 9 0 3 1 3 , 2 9 0 2 4 6 , 7 2 1 4 4 . 0 5 % 8 , 9 5 8 Ot h G o v R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 1 , 4 0 5 (1 , 4 0 5 ) 0.00% 0 Ot h G o v S t a t e R e v e n u e S h a r i n g R e v e n u e 6 , 6 7 1 , 2 9 4 0 0 0 6 , 6 7 1 , 2 9 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v S t a t e L i q u o r A p p o r t i o n m e n t R e v e n u e 9 9 5 , 4 0 6 0 0 0 9 9 5 , 4 0 6 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v M e r i d i a n D o w n t o w n D e v e l o p m e n t 0 0 (2 4 , 8 2 4 ) 14 3 (1 4 3 ) 0.00% 16,000 Ot h G o v R e c y c l e d R e v e n u e 0 0 0 3 0 1 (3 0 1 ) 0.00% 0 Ot h G o v D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 1 8 , 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 8 , 4 1 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v M A C A r t s C o m m i s s i o n R e v e n u e s 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 5 2 5 7 2 5 9 , 2 7 5 9 2 . 7 4 % 3 5 Ot h G o v I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 20 2 , 0 0 0 0 10 0 , 3 2 1 29 4 , 6 7 9 (9 2 , 6 7 9 ) (45.88)%136,934 Ot h G o v T o t a l R E V E N U E S 42 , 9 9 2 , 5 9 9 56 0 , 0 1 1 39 3 , 6 5 6 63 3 , 5 9 2 42 , 9 1 9 , 0 1 9 98.55%220,322 Ot h G o v Ot h G o v PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Ot h G o v W a g e s 22 6 , 2 8 4 0 1 8 , 8 0 0 5 5 , 3 8 0 1 7 0 , 9 0 4 7 5 . 5 2 % 3 4 , 3 8 6 Ot h G o v W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 6 , 0 0 0 0 3 9 8 1 , 1 3 2 4 , 8 6 8 8 1 . 1 3 % 1 , 1 5 4 Ot h G o v F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 17 , 7 7 0 0 1 , 4 1 5 4 , 1 5 4 1 3 , 6 1 6 7 6 . 6 2 % 2 , 6 3 2 Ot h G o v P E R S I 27 , 0 1 9 0 2 , 1 2 8 6 , 2 6 9 2 0 , 7 5 0 7 6 . 7 9 % 3 , 8 9 3 Ot h G o v W o r k e r s ' C o m p 3, 6 1 4 0 0 0 3 , 6 1 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 4 5 , 5 9 4 0 9 0 4 2 4 4 5 , 1 7 0 9 9 . 0 6 % 7 , 6 8 2 Ot h G o v M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 , 4 3 2 1 0 , 2 9 6 (1 0 , 2 9 6 ) 0.00% 0 Ot h G o v V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 4 0 1 2 1 (1 2 1 ) 0.00% 0 Ot h G o v D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 5 1 7 5 2 (7 5 2 ) 0.00% 0 Ot h G o v L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 4 6 8 (6 8 ) 0.00% 0 Ot h G o v S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 4 9 9 6 (9 6 ) 0.00% 0 Ot h G o v L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 6 0 1 1 7 (1 1 7 ) 0.00% 0 Ot h G o v E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 16 31 (3 1 ) 0.00%0 Ot h G o v T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 32 6 , 2 8 1 0 26 , 7 1 2 78 , 8 4 1 24 7 , 4 4 0 75.84%49,747 Ot h G o v Ot h G o v OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Ot h G o v O f f i c e E x p e n s e 1, 2 5 0 0 1 9 4 3 6 2 8 8 8 7 1 . 0 6 % 1 6 0 Ot h G o v C o p i e r E x p e n s e 7, 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 4 7 0 5 , 5 3 0 7 8 . 9 9 % 1 , 4 7 0 Ot h G o v E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 2 4 0 0 1 5 1 6 2 2 4 9 3 . 2 6 % 9 Ot h G o v B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 6, 1 5 0 0 0 1 3 8 6 , 0 1 3 9 7 . 7 6 % 6 0 Ot h G o v P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v S t r e e t L i g h t / S i g n s R e p a i r s / M a i n t e n a n c e 5 5 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 4 8 8 2 0 , 9 4 1 3 4 , 0 5 9 6 1 . 9 2 % 9 , 8 1 8 Ot h G o v G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 30 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 2, 8 2 0 0 1 6 5 7 9 4 2 , 0 2 6 7 1 . 8 4 % 3 7 4 Ot h G o v A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 1 , 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 2 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 2 0 Ot h G o v H i s t o r i c P r e s e r v a t i o n 1 4 , 4 0 0 0 0 6 , 2 3 4 8 , 1 6 6 5 6 . 7 0 % 3 3 Ot h G o v M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 40 , 5 0 0 0 0 3 6 9 4 0 , 1 3 1 9 9 . 0 8 % 5 1 8 Ot h G o v T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S e r v i c e s 2 7 5 , 0 2 0 0 2 7 5 , 0 2 0 2 7 5 , 0 2 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 9 4 , 9 3 8 Ot h G o v S e n i o r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v R e c y c l e F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n s 2 0 , 8 2 0 2 7 , 4 5 8 0 1 5 , 0 0 0 3 3 , 2 7 8 6 8 . 9 2 % 0 Ot h G o v A l l u m b a u g h H o u s e 64 , 2 2 9 0 0 1 6 , 0 7 2 4 8 , 1 5 7 7 4 . 9 7 % 1 4 , 3 6 5 33 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 3 6 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ot h G o v E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 6 1 , 2 0 0 9 8 , 9 0 9 0 2 8 , 5 9 8 1 3 1 , 5 1 1 8 2 . 1 3 % 1 6 , 5 0 9 Ot h G o v E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 2 5 0 0 0 (4 0 ) 29 0 1 1 6 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 3 7 , 7 3 0 0 0 0 3 7 , 7 3 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v A r t s C o m m i s s i o n E x p e n s e s 2 8 , 5 0 0 0 2 5 3 1 , 3 4 8 2 7 , 1 5 2 9 5 . 2 7 % 6 , 4 8 2 Ot h G o v T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 0 0 6 9 2 0 6 (2 0 6 ) 0.00% 206 Ot h G o v P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 6, 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 6 5 , 3 1 4 8 8 . 5 6 % 7 1 3 Ot h G o v R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 24 0 0 2 7 8 2 1 5 8 6 5 . 8 5 % 5 8 Ot h G o v C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 60 0 0 5 3 1 5 9 4 4 1 7 3 . 5 3 % 1 5 7 Ot h G o v B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 3 5 0 0 0 3 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 3 , 6 9 1 0 0 1 , 0 2 3 2 , 6 6 8 7 2 . 2 7 % 0 Ot h G o v T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1, 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 7 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 78 4 0 0 0 7 8 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 9 , 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 3 0 8 , 8 7 0 9 8 . 5 5 % 1 7 5 Ot h G o v P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 25 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 5 Ot h G o v I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 0 0 0 6 , 6 5 4 (6 , 6 5 4 ) 0.00%(5,197) Ot h G o v E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 3 2 5 , 6 6 0 1 , 3 0 0 2 8 , 0 4 3 8 4 , 1 8 8 2 4 2 , 7 7 2 7 4 . 2 5 % 8 2 , 6 9 0 Ot h G o v I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 0 5 0 0 1 7 3 7 4 6 3 9 2 . 6 4 % 0 Ot h G o v D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 7 4 , 1 7 0 0 6 7 5 4 5 , 6 6 5 2 8 , 5 0 5 3 8 . 4 3 % 4 4 , 5 4 9 Ot h G o v I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 40 0 0 0 3 7 5 2 5 6 . 3 1 % 3 6 7 Ot h G o v A D A C o m p l i a n c e 10 , 0 0 0 0 0 7 9 0 9 , 2 1 0 9 2 . 1 0 % 1 , 0 1 5 Ot h G o v H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 60 0 5 2 5 2 8 1 2 . 7 0 % 3 9 Ot h G o v M i s c e l l a n e o u s E x p e n s e 4 , 9 5 4 6 0 0 0 5 , 0 1 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v V o l u n t e e r e x p e n s e 2, 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v F i x e d A s s e t s - G a i n o r L o s s 0 0 0 3 , 5 0 0 (3 , 5 0 0 ) 0.00% 0 Ot h G o v G r a n t E x p e n d i t u r e s 0 56 0 , 0 1 1 31 3 , 2 9 0 31 3 , 2 9 0 24 6 , 7 2 1 44.05%72,510 Ot h G o v T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 1, 0 7 9 , 2 5 3 68 8 , 2 3 8 64 0 , 4 4 2 84 3 , 1 5 8 92 4 , 3 3 3 52.30%442,182 Ot h G o v Ot h G o v Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Ot h G o v C a p i t a l - S i g n s / A r t 96 , 6 2 0 0 0 0 9 6 , 6 2 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 2 , 0 0 0 Ot h G o v C a p i t a l - C o m m u n i c a t i o n E q u i p m e n t 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 (3 0 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 1 7 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ot h G o v T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 29 6 , 6 2 0 (3 0 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 26 6 , 6 2 0 100.00%32,000 Ot h G o v Ot h G o v DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 7 0 2 , 1 5 4 65 8 , 2 3 8 66 7 , 1 5 3 92 1 , 9 9 9 1, 4 3 8 , 3 9 3 60.93%523,928 Ot h G o v Ot h G o v Tr a n s f e r s Ot h G o v P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (8 1 , 5 7 0 ) 0 (6 , 6 7 8 ) ( 1 9 , 7 1 0 ) ( 6 1 , 8 6 0 ) 75.83%(21,678) Ot h G o v O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (9 , 6 3 3 ) 0 0 0 (9 , 6 3 3 ) 100.00%0 Ot h G o v T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (9 1 , 2 0 3 ) 0 (6 , 6 7 8 ) (1 9 , 7 1 0 ) (7 1 , 4 9 3 ) 78.39%(21,678) Ot h G o v Ot h G o v In t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s Ot h G o v T r a n s f e r o f E q u i t y (1 5 4 , 0 4 0 ) 0 0 0 (1 5 4 , 0 4 0 ) 100.00%0 Ot h G o v T o t a l I n t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s (1 5 4 , 0 4 0 ) 0 0 0 (1 5 4 , 0 4 0 ) 100.00%0 Ot h G o v Ot h G o v TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 4 5 6 , 9 1 1 65 8 , 2 3 8 66 0 , 4 7 5 90 2 , 2 8 9 1, 2 1 2 , 8 6 0 57.34%502,251 34 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 3 7 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ci t y H a l l 1 8 5 0 - C i t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l RE V E N U E S Ci t y H a l l R e n t a l I n c o m e 19 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 6 8 1 5 , 0 4 3 1 3 , 9 5 7 7 3 . 4 5 % 5 , 0 4 3 Ci t y H a l l M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 23 2 (2 3 2 ) 0.00%0 Ci t y H a l l T o t a l R E V E N U E S 19 , 0 0 0 0 1, 6 8 1 5, 2 7 5 13 , 7 2 5 72.23%5,043 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Ci t y H a l l W a g e s 15 3 , 2 7 3 0 1 2 , 6 8 4 3 7 , 3 4 9 1 1 5 , 9 2 4 7 5 . 6 3 % 1 3 , 0 7 3 Ci t y H a l l O v e r t i m e W a g e s 67 8 0 9 2 3 7 5 3 0 3 4 4 . 6 6 % 7 0 2 Ci t y H a l l F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 11 , 7 7 7 0 9 5 6 2 , 8 2 3 8 , 9 5 4 7 6 . 0 3 % 1 , 0 5 4 Ci t y H a l l P E R S I 18 , 3 8 2 0 1 , 4 4 6 4 , 2 7 0 1 4 , 1 1 2 7 6 . 7 6 % 1 , 5 5 9 Ci t y H a l l W o r k e r s ' C o m p 5, 0 6 5 0 0 0 5 , 0 6 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 4 5 , 5 9 4 0 1 0 5 4 3 2 4 5 , 1 6 2 9 9 . 0 5 % 1 , 8 7 6 Ci t y H a l l M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 , 3 7 7 7 , 1 3 0 (7 , 1 3 0 ) 0.00% 0 Ci t y H a l l V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 3 1 9 4 (9 4 ) 0.00% 0 Ci t y H a l l D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 7 3 5 1 9 (5 1 9 ) 0.00% 0 Ci t y H a l l L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 4 6 7 (6 7 ) 0.00% 0 Ci t y H a l l S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 3 6 5 (6 5 ) 0.00% 0 Ci t y H a l l L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 4 0 7 9 (7 9 ) 0.00% 0 Ci t y H a l l E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 12 23 (2 3 ) 0.00%0 Ci t y H a l l T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 23 4 , 7 6 9 0 17 , 9 8 2 53 , 2 2 7 18 1 , 5 4 2 77.33%18,264 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Ci t y H a l l O f f i c e E x p e n s e 85 0 0 0 2 4 8 2 6 9 7 . 1 7 % 6 6 Ci t y H a l l E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 1 8 0 0 3 8 4 1 1 3 9 7 7 . 2 7 % 1 9 Ci t y H a l l J a n i t o r i a l 12 7 , 5 9 1 0 4 1 9 1 3 , 0 1 1 1 1 4 , 5 8 0 8 9 . 8 0 % 3 0 , 1 7 3 Ci t y H a l l S a f e t y E x p e n s e 85 0 0 0 0 8 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 0 Ci t y H a l l S h o p S u p p l i e s 2, 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 1 , 9 3 5 9 6 . 7 4 % 0 Ci t y H a l l F u e l s - G a s 1, 0 0 0 0 9 0 3 0 5 6 9 5 6 9 . 4 5 % 9 7 Ci t y H a l l C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 7 Ci t y H a l l M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 0 0 2 1 8 4 (8 4 ) 0.00% 37 Ci t y H a l l B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 2 0 0 , 1 6 2 (8 , 0 0 0 ) 1, 3 4 9 1 3 , 3 4 7 1 7 8 , 8 1 5 9 3 . 0 5 % 1 6 , 6 8 9 Ci t y H a l l P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 2 , 5 0 0 0 0 2 9 5 2 , 2 0 5 8 8 . 1 9 % 0 Ci t y H a l l V e h i c l e R e p a i r 2, 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 2, 0 0 0 0 0 4 9 1 , 9 5 1 9 7 . 5 6 % 6 4 2 Ci t y H a l l E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 1 7 , 6 2 7 0 0 3 0 5 1 7 , 3 2 2 9 8 . 2 6 % 1 , 1 9 3 Ci t y H a l l E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 4, 0 0 0 0 0 4 9 3 , 9 5 1 9 8 . 7 7 % 0 Ci t y H a l l E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 3 7 0 0 0 0 3 7 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 3 0 , 7 2 0 (1 7 , 2 2 7 ) 0 1 4 , 4 9 1 (9 9 8 ) (7.39)% 600 Ci t y H a l l C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 3 , 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 6 3 Ci t y H a l l T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 1, 9 3 5 0 1 8 0 5 3 9 1 , 3 9 6 7 2 . 1 4 % 5 2 2 Ci t y H a l l P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 3, 8 6 9 0 8 9 2 2 , 3 2 0 1 , 5 4 9 4 0 . 0 3 % 2 , 3 2 0 Ci t y H a l l R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 1 , 0 0 8 0 7 7 1 8 6 8 2 2 8 1 . 5 6 % 8 0 Ci t y H a l l C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 1, 8 0 0 0 1 1 6 3 4 9 1 , 4 5 1 8 0 . 5 8 % 1 8 6 Ci t y H a l l E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 8 0 0 0 7 2 5 7 2 5 7 5 9 . 3 7 % 0 Ci t y H a l l P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 50 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 6 Ci t y H a l l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 2 3 , 3 6 1 0 0 1 0 , 3 8 0 1 2 , 9 8 1 5 5 . 5 6 % 9 , 8 9 9 Ci t y H a l l E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 9 6 , 6 6 3 0 6 , 5 0 1 2 0 , 9 2 4 7 5 , 7 3 9 7 8 . 3 5 % 2 1 , 2 2 3 35 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 3 8 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Ci t y H a l l I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 15 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 1 2 7 2 , 2 4 8 1 2 , 7 5 2 8 5 . 0 1 % 2 , 3 1 5 Ci t y H a l l B l d g & S t r u c t u r e s R e n t a l & L e a s e 2 1 , 5 4 9 0 1 , 8 6 4 5 , 4 7 2 1 6 , 0 7 7 7 4 . 6 0 % 5 , 1 7 9 Ci t y H a l l D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Ci t y H a l l I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 40 0 0 0 1 5 6 2 4 4 6 0 . 9 2 % 1 5 3 Ci t y H a l l H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 45 0 31 31 14 30.75%45 Ci t y H a l l T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 56 3 , 0 8 0 (2 5 , 2 2 7 ) 13 , 4 3 1 85 , 3 9 8 45 2 , 4 5 5 84.12%91,945 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Ci t y H a l l B u i l d i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s 2 2 1 , 6 9 0 (9 2 , 3 9 0 ) ( 8 , 2 3 8 ) 14 1 1 2 9 , 1 5 9 9 9 . 8 9 % 0 Ci t y H a l l C I P - M u n i c i p a l C e n t e r 4 9 , 3 5 3 (1 , 6 0 0 ) 0 0 47 , 7 5 3 100.00%301 Ci t y H a l l T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 27 1 , 0 4 3 (9 3 , 9 9 1 ) (8 , 2 3 8 ) 14 1 17 6 , 9 1 1 99.92%301 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 0 6 8 , 8 9 2 (1 1 9 , 2 1 8 ) 23 , 1 7 5 13 8 , 7 6 6 81 0 , 9 0 8 85.38%110,510 Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l Tr a n s f e r s Ci t y H a l l P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (1 3 4 , 8 0 5 ) 0 (1 0 , 3 2 5 ) ( 3 0 , 5 6 3 ) ( 1 0 4 , 2 4 2 ) 77.32%(10,487) Ci t y H a l l O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (2 8 2 , 5 0 6 ) 0 (7 , 7 1 2 ) (4 4 , 3 8 5 ) (2 3 8 , 1 2 1 ) 84.28%(52,709) Ci t y H a l l T o t a l T r a n s f e r s (4 1 7 , 3 1 1 ) 0 (1 8 , 0 3 7 ) (7 4 , 9 4 8 ) (3 4 2 , 3 6 3 ) 82.04%(63,196) Ci t y H a l l Ci t y H a l l TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 65 1 , 5 8 1 (1 1 9 , 2 1 8 ) 5, 1 3 8 63 , 8 1 8 46 8 , 5 4 5 88.01%47,314 36 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 3 9 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Co m D e v 1 9 1 0 - C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p t s Co m D e v RE V E N U E S Co m D e v B l d g P e r m i t s - R e s i d e n t i a l R e v e n u e 2 , 1 7 4 , 4 3 0 0 1 7 1 , 4 6 5 5 8 2 , 9 8 9 1 , 5 9 1 , 4 4 1 7 3 . 1 8 % 5 7 3 , 5 8 4 Co m D e v P l u m b i n g P e r m i t R e v e n u e s 5 4 0 , 2 9 6 0 5 3 , 8 2 9 1 6 5 , 1 5 9 3 7 5 , 1 3 7 6 9 . 4 3 % 1 5 0 , 9 8 4 Co m D e v M e c h a n i c a l P e r m i t R e v e n u e s 6 5 7 , 7 7 6 0 6 1 , 2 4 6 2 0 5 , 7 4 4 4 5 2 , 0 3 2 6 8 . 7 2 % 1 5 8 , 8 2 0 Co m D e v E l e c t r i c a l P e r m i t R e v e n u e s 4 2 2 , 8 1 1 0 3 8 , 8 2 0 1 5 7 , 1 8 8 2 6 5 , 6 2 3 6 2 . 8 2 % 1 0 7 , 3 1 5 Co m D e v F i r e I n s p e c t i o n & P e r m i t F e e s 4 5 7 , 6 1 4 0 8 6 , 2 4 0 1 8 0 , 1 3 9 2 7 7 , 4 7 5 6 0 . 6 3 % 1 1 6 , 7 5 1 Co m D e v B l d g P e r m i t s - M u l t i f a m i l y R e v e n u e 5 4 0 , 6 8 3 0 2 1 2 , 9 0 0 3 3 6 , 3 6 2 2 0 4 , 3 2 1 3 7 . 7 8 % 1 8 1 , 9 6 6 Co m D e v B l d g P e r m i t s - C o m m e r c i a l R e v e n u e 1 , 3 4 5 , 5 7 0 0 1 7 6 , 7 9 4 4 7 0 , 3 8 0 8 7 5 , 1 9 0 6 5 . 0 4 % 2 5 1 , 8 3 1 Co m D e v F l o o d P l a i n P e r m i t R e v e n u e 3 2 8 0 2 5 5 0 2 7 8 8 4 . 7 5 % 1 0 0 Co m D e v F i l i n g F e e s - R e v e n u e s 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 8 , 1 3 0 9 4 , 6 1 0 3 0 5 , 3 9 0 7 6 . 3 4 % 1 1 9 , 9 3 8 Co m D e v G r a n t R e v e n u e s 0 1 3 , 6 5 7 0 0 1 3 , 6 5 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 2 , 0 9 5 2 , 1 0 3 (2 , 1 0 3 ) 0.00% 7,530 Co m D e v M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 40 16 0 (1 6 0 ) 0.00%60 Co m D e v T o t a l R E V E N U E S 6, 5 3 9 , 5 0 8 13 , 6 5 7 83 1 , 5 8 3 2, 1 9 4 , 8 8 4 4, 3 5 8 , 2 8 1 66.51%1,668,879 Co m D e v Co m D e v PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Co m D e v W a g e s 2, 2 5 2 , 2 7 6 2 9 8 , 7 7 1 1 2 6 , 1 4 6 3 5 1 , 0 2 8 2 , 2 0 0 , 0 1 9 8 6 . 2 3 % 2 1 7 , 9 4 4 Co m D e v W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 , 6 2 4 Co m D e v O v e r t i m e W a g e s 10 , 4 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 2 0 7 9 6 8 1 1 , 9 3 2 9 2 . 4 9 % 0 Co m D e v F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 17 3 , 0 9 4 2 3 , 0 4 7 9 , 1 8 6 2 5 , 5 9 4 1 7 0 , 5 4 7 8 6 . 9 5 % 1 6 , 5 2 6 Co m D e v P E R S I 27 4 , 0 8 7 3 5 , 9 7 2 1 4 , 1 3 1 3 9 , 6 7 4 2 7 0 , 3 8 5 8 7 . 2 0 % 2 5 , 5 3 4 Co m D e v W o r k e r s ' C o m p 9, 9 0 8 1 0 , 1 8 3 0 0 2 0 , 0 9 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 5 9 2 , 7 2 2 7 5 , 9 9 0 7 8 5 3 , 2 9 3 6 6 5 , 4 1 9 9 9 . 5 0 % 4 5 , 1 9 0 Co m D e v M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 7 , 5 9 3 7 6 , 9 7 4 (7 6 , 9 7 4 ) 0.00% 0 Co m D e v V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 3 4 8 9 7 3 (9 7 3 ) 0.00% 0 Co m D e v D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 , 0 8 3 5 , 8 4 3 (5 , 8 4 3 ) 0.00% 0 Co m D e v L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 9 2 5 7 3 (5 7 3 ) 0.00% 0 Co m D e v S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 1 0 6 0 4 (6 0 4 ) 0.00% 0 Co m D e v L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 8 7 7 5 2 (7 5 2 ) 0.00% 0 Co m D e v E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 10 1 19 5 (1 9 5 ) 0.00%0 Co m D e v T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 3, 3 1 2 , 4 8 7 44 6 , 4 6 3 18 1 , 5 6 9 50 6 , 4 7 1 3, 2 5 2 , 4 7 9 86.53%312,818 Co m D e v Co m D e v OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Co m D e v O f f i c e E x p e n s e 11 , 9 0 0 2 , 1 0 4 7 4 1 , 2 2 6 1 2 , 7 7 8 9 1 . 2 4 % 1 , 1 4 4 Co m D e v C o p i e r E x p e n s e 9, 4 9 6 0 5 8 8 1 , 6 2 1 7 , 8 7 5 8 2 . 9 2 % 2 , 3 3 9 Co m D e v E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 2 , 3 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 , 0 4 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 Co m D e v S a f e t y E x p e n s e 2, 6 0 0 (1 0 0 ) 57 5 6 1 8 1 , 8 8 2 7 5 . 2 6 % 0 Co m D e v F u e l s - G a s 34 , 7 0 0 1 4 , 2 5 0 5 7 0 1 , 8 0 0 4 7 , 1 5 0 9 6 . 3 2 % 5 3 Co m D e v C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 4, 4 0 0 1 , 4 0 0 2 7 6 2 , 1 3 0 3 , 6 7 0 6 3 . 2 8 % 0 Co m D e v B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 3, 0 0 0 (3 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v V e h i c l e R e p a i r 6, 5 0 0 4 , 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 6, 5 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 1 , 6 5 2 3 , 4 7 7 5 , 5 2 3 6 1 . 3 6 % 6 0 Co m D e v S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 0 3 , 0 1 9 0 0 1 8 , 5 3 0 8 4 , 4 8 9 8 2 . 0 1 % 1 8 , 3 8 1 Co m D e v E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 3, 2 5 0 (6 6 ) 20 2 3 9 2 , 9 4 5 9 2 . 5 0 % 0 Co m D e v E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 8 , 2 0 0 (6 0 0 ) 1, 7 3 1 1 , 7 5 3 5 , 8 4 7 7 6 . 9 3 % 4 1 Co m D e v S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 19 , 2 6 4 1 8 , 3 3 7 2 5 , 1 1 6 2 6 , 7 1 9 1 0 , 8 8 2 2 8 . 9 4 % 0 Co m D e v F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 0 , 4 0 8 6 , 6 5 4 0 0 1 7 , 0 6 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 2 1 , 4 0 7 (4 , 9 8 3 ) 0 4 , 3 3 9 1 2 , 0 8 5 7 3 . 5 7 % 5 2 6 37 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 4 0 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Co m D e v P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 2 6 4 , 4 7 1 (3 5 , 5 3 7 ) 18 , 5 3 8 3 3 , 8 4 3 1 9 5 , 0 9 1 8 5 . 2 1 % 3 , 0 0 0 Co m D e v C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 39 , 0 0 0 5 2 , 0 0 0 3 , 4 4 0 1 4 , 3 8 7 7 6 , 6 1 3 8 4 . 1 9 % 7 , 5 2 5 Co m D e v B u i l d i n g I n s p e c t i o n s 0 2 9 7 , 9 1 5 2 2 , 3 3 9 2 3 0 , 0 4 0 6 7 , 8 7 5 2 2 . 7 8 % 2 2 5 , 0 2 8 Co m D e v M e c h a n i c a l I n s p e c t i o n s 4 2 7 , 5 5 4 0 3 6 , 7 4 7 1 2 3 , 4 4 6 3 0 4 , 1 0 8 7 1 . 1 2 % 9 5 , 2 9 2 Co m D e v E l e c t r i c a l I n s p e c t i o n s 0 5 2 , 0 8 5 1 6 , 3 8 1 3 5 , 0 0 9 1 7 , 0 7 6 3 2 . 7 8 % 7 5 , 8 3 0 Co m D e v P l u m b i n g I n s p e c t i o n s 3 2 4 , 1 7 8 0 3 2 , 2 9 8 9 9 , 0 9 6 2 2 5 , 0 8 2 6 9 . 4 3 % 9 0 , 5 9 1 Co m D e v F i r e I n s p e c t i o n s 33 4 , 0 5 8 0 6 2 , 9 5 5 1 3 1 , 5 1 9 2 0 2 , 5 3 9 6 0 . 6 2 % 8 5 , 3 2 6 Co m D e v C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 2 3 0 , 0 0 0 (3 5 0 , 0 0 0 ) 63 2 2 , 6 7 2 (1 2 2 , 6 7 2 ) 102.22% 1,646 Co m D e v T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 3, 3 7 2 1 , 2 8 4 0 8 7 5 3 , 7 8 1 8 1 . 2 0 % 0 Co m D e v P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 60 0 0 2 2 8 7 5 1 3 8 5 . 4 4 % 2 3 4 Co m D e v R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 3 0 , 7 2 0 2 , 4 0 0 6 3 2 1 , 8 4 2 3 1 , 2 7 8 9 4 . 4 3 % 1 , 2 9 4 Co m D e v C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 18 , 8 4 0 3 , 6 0 0 5 5 6 1 , 4 3 3 2 1 , 0 0 7 9 3 . 6 1 % 4 8 4 Co m D e v R e c r u i t m e n t E x p e n s e s 3 9 , 0 6 3 (1 0 , 5 7 3 ) 9, 5 0 5 1 4 , 5 2 7 1 3 , 9 6 3 4 9 . 0 1 % 0 Co m D e v B u s i n e s s M e a l s 1, 6 4 0 (1 4 4 ) 0 4 1 1 , 4 5 5 9 7 . 2 7 % 1 7 9 Co m D e v M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 0 2 7 7 3 7 2 . 9 8 % 1 1 Co m D e v E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 4 1 , 3 6 0 5 , 0 0 0 3 , 1 0 7 1 3 , 1 4 0 3 3 , 2 2 0 7 1 . 6 5 % 4 3 8 Co m D e v T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 9 , 9 3 5 2 , 5 0 0 8 6 5 1 , 8 2 2 2 0 , 6 1 3 9 1 . 8 7 % 0 Co m D e v T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 22 , 6 5 0 2 , 5 0 0 2 , 2 3 1 3 , 6 9 0 2 1 , 4 6 0 8 5 . 3 2 % 0 Co m D e v T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 14 , 9 7 0 4 , 9 0 0 1 , 0 5 6 1 , 6 6 8 1 8 , 2 0 2 9 1 . 6 0 % 0 Co m D e v A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 1 2 , 3 7 7 8 0 0 0 1 2 , 4 5 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 7 8 Co m D e v L e g a l N o t i c e s 12 , 0 0 0 0 4 9 5 1 , 7 4 8 1 0 , 2 5 2 8 5 . 4 3 % 1 , 8 9 2 Co m D e v P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 7, 0 0 0 0 4 6 2 , 4 5 0 4 , 5 5 0 6 4 . 9 9 % 3 0 5 Co m D e v D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 3 1 , 1 6 9 4 5 0 5 , 1 1 5 7 , 7 8 2 2 3 , 8 3 7 7 5 . 3 8 % 2 , 6 1 2 Co m D e v C o m m i s s i o n E x p e n s e 1, 5 1 0 0 8 3 8 3 1 , 4 2 7 9 4 . 4 8 % 0 Co m D e v H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 58 5 7 5 4 5 0 4 5 0 2 1 0 3 1 . 8 4 % 4 1 3 Co m D e v M e r i d i a n D e v e l o p m e n t 7 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Co m D e v G r a n t E x p e n d i t u r e s 0 13 , 6 5 7 3 1, 0 9 5 12 , 5 6 3 91.98%890 Co m D e v T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 2, 1 9 9 , 1 3 6 83 , 8 8 8 24 8 , 0 9 8 78 5 , 2 2 5 1, 4 9 7 , 7 9 9 65.61%616,514 Co m D e v Co m D e v Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Co m D e v C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 23 3 , 3 5 6 8 1 , 9 0 1 1 3 4 , 8 8 8 1 3 9 , 4 7 3 1 7 5 , 7 8 3 5 5 . 7 5 % 0 Co m D e v C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 19 1 , 6 0 0 (1 , 1 7 3 ) 43 , 4 1 0 4 3 , 4 1 0 1 4 7 , 0 1 6 7 7 . 2 0 % 0 Co m D e v T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 42 4 , 9 5 6 80 , 7 2 7 17 8 , 2 9 9 18 2 , 8 8 4 32 2 , 8 0 0 63.83%0 Co m D e v Co m D e v DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 5, 9 3 6 , 5 7 9 61 1 , 0 7 8 60 7 , 9 6 6 1, 4 7 4 , 5 7 9 5, 0 7 3 , 0 7 8 77.47%929,332 Co m D e v Co m D e v Tr a n s f e r s Co m D e v P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T (6 3 , 1 8 2 ) 0 (4 , 9 6 5 ) ( 1 4 , 7 2 6 ) ( 4 8 , 4 5 6 ) 76.69%(14,706) Co m D e v P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e - I N 5 8 , 2 8 5 0 4 , 5 6 6 1 3 , 4 8 9 4 4 , 7 9 6 7 6 . 8 5 % 9 , 0 9 7 Co m D e v O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e - I N 6 3 , 5 6 6 0 1, 7 3 5 9, 9 8 7 53 , 5 7 9 84.28%11,860 Co m D e v T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 58 , 6 6 9 0 1, 3 3 7 8, 7 5 0 49 , 9 1 9 85.09%6,250 Co m D e v Co m D e v In t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s Co m D e v T r a n s f e r o f E q u i t y 15 4 , 0 4 0 0 0 0 15 4 , 0 4 0 100.00%0 Co m D e v T o t a l I n t e r f u n d C a s h T r a n s f e r s 1 5 4 , 0 4 0 0 0 0 15 4 , 0 4 0 100.00%0 Co m D e v Co m D e v TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 6, 1 4 9 , 2 8 8 61 1 , 0 7 8 60 9 , 3 0 3 1, 4 8 3 , 3 2 9 5, 2 7 7 , 0 3 7 78.05%935,582 38 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 4 1 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Po l i c e 2 1 1 0 - P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t Po l i c e RE V E N U E S Po l i c e D o g L i c e n s e R e v e n u e s 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 8 7 1 6 , 5 6 1 4 3 , 4 4 0 8 6 . 8 7 % 3 , 8 5 4 Po l i c e F a l s e A l a r m F e e s 0 0 1 , 9 7 0 6 , 7 6 5 (6 , 7 6 5 ) 0.00% 6,880 Po l i c e G r a n t R e v e n u e s 0 8 , 5 1 4 4 , 7 0 0 4 , 7 0 0 3 , 8 1 4 4 4 . 7 9 % 0 Po l i c e R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 1 2 , 1 4 5 2 1 , 6 8 0 (2 1 , 6 8 0 ) 0.00% 18,884 Po l i c e C o u r t R e v e n u e 33 2 , 5 0 0 0 3 3 , 0 9 5 6 6 , 2 8 9 2 6 6 , 2 1 1 8 0 . 0 6 % 7 2 , 3 3 6 Po l i c e R e s t i t u t i o n 0 0 6 2 0 9 5 6 (9 5 6 ) 0.00% 2,073 Po l i c e S t a t e D r u g S e i z u r e R e v e n u e 0 0 0 2 8 0 (2 8 0 ) 0.00% 4,329 Po l i c e S c h o o l R e s o u r c e R e v e n u e 4 2 3 , 5 1 6 0 2 2 9 , 4 2 6 2 3 4 , 2 5 3 1 8 9 , 2 6 3 4 4 . 6 8 % 1 , 9 7 4 Po l i c e R e n t a l I n c o m e 3, 0 0 0 0 4 7 1 , 0 6 1 1 , 9 3 9 6 4 . 6 4 % 9 5 0 Po l i c e I m p a c t R e v - M u l t i f a m i l y 2 9 , 3 3 6 0 3 9 , 0 2 5 7 0 , 2 4 5 (4 0 , 9 0 9 ) (139.44)% 31,487 Po l i c e I m p a c t R e v - C o m m e r c i a l 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 3 , 0 2 6 4 9 , 9 6 3 (2 9 , 9 6 3 ) (149.81)% 9,874 Po l i c e I m p a c t R e v - R e s i d e n t i a l 1 6 6 , 2 3 7 0 2 9 , 6 5 9 9 4 , 5 5 2 7 1 , 6 8 5 4 3 . 1 2 % 5 3 , 7 4 5 Po l i c e D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 9 , 9 5 0 9 9 . 5 0 % 4 , 0 9 3 Po l i c e T r a i n i n g C l a s s R e v e n u e 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 (2 , 5 0 0 ) 0.00% 0 Po l i c e M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 7 7 2 1 7 , 3 4 2 (1 7 , 3 4 2 ) 0.00% 1,264 Po l i c e F i n e s , F o r f e i t R e v e n u e s 5 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 1 7 0 6 , 4 0 0 (1 , 4 0 0 ) (27.99)% 3,375 Po l i c e I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 0 0 3 , 7 4 1 9 , 1 7 9 (9 , 1 7 9 ) 0.00% 0 Po l i c e S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%5,940 Po l i c e T o t a l R E V E N U E S 1, 0 2 9 , 5 8 9 18 , 5 1 4 38 3 , 3 1 8 59 2 , 7 7 5 45 5 , 3 2 8 43.44%221,057 Po l i c e Po l i c e PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Po l i c e W a g e s 11 , 0 9 5 , 5 9 3 0 8 8 8 , 6 6 5 2 , 5 8 1 , 6 7 0 8 , 5 1 3 , 9 2 3 7 6 . 7 3 % 2 , 1 7 2 , 9 6 3 Po l i c e K - 9 W a g e s 50 , 6 2 5 0 4 , 1 6 1 1 2 , 6 2 2 3 8 , 0 0 3 7 5 . 0 6 % 1 0 , 9 4 9 Po l i c e W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 1 9 , 5 1 4 0 1 , 5 9 5 4 , 9 8 2 1 4 , 5 3 2 7 4 . 4 6 % 4 , 9 9 7 Po l i c e O v e r t i m e W a g e s 64 0 , 9 8 9 5 , 8 7 2 4 7 , 2 0 7 1 7 1 , 9 6 7 4 7 4 , 8 9 4 7 3 . 4 1 % 1 6 4 , 8 2 3 Po l i c e U n i f o r m A l l o w a n c e 13 5 , 9 0 0 0 0 1 1 7 , 4 4 3 1 8 , 4 5 7 1 3 . 5 8 % 1 1 1 , 8 5 0 Po l i c e F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 91 3 , 6 1 1 4 5 0 6 9 , 2 1 3 2 1 2 , 5 9 1 7 0 1 , 4 7 0 7 6 . 7 4 % 1 8 1 , 1 8 0 Po l i c e P E R S I 1, 4 5 8 , 7 6 5 7 0 0 1 0 9 , 2 2 0 3 1 9 , 9 6 5 1 , 1 3 9 , 5 0 0 7 8 . 0 7 % 2 7 2 , 6 8 0 Po l i c e W o r k e r s ' C o m p 38 1 , 5 7 7 1 9 8 0 0 3 8 1 , 7 7 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Po l i c e E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 2 , 2 7 9 , 7 0 0 0 3 , 5 7 5 1 9 , 4 5 0 2 , 2 6 0 , 2 5 0 9 9 . 1 4 % 4 2 3 , 9 7 6 Po l i c e U n e m p l o y m e n t 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 7 2 Po l i c e M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 3 8 , 0 5 8 4 1 9 , 5 6 2 (4 1 9 , 5 6 2 ) 0.00% 0 Po l i c e V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 1 , 8 4 1 5 , 5 2 3 (5 , 5 2 3 ) 0.00% 0 Po l i c e D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 1 , 3 5 0 3 4 , 0 5 0 (3 4 , 0 5 0 ) 0.00% 0 Po l i c e L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 , 5 1 6 3 , 0 3 2 (3 , 0 3 2 ) 0.00% 0 Po l i c e S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 , 0 5 1 4 , 1 0 8 (4 , 1 0 8 ) 0.00% 0 Po l i c e L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 , 5 8 6 5 , 1 7 8 (5 , 1 7 8 ) 0.00% 0 Po l i c e E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 52 9 1, 0 6 6 (1 , 0 6 6 ) 0.00%0 Po l i c e T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 16 , 9 7 6 , 2 7 4 7, 2 2 0 1, 2 8 1 , 5 6 7 3, 9 1 3 , 2 0 9 13 , 0 7 0 , 2 8 5 76.96%3,343,489 Po l i c e Po l i c e OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Po l i c e O f f i c e E x p e n s e 32 , 5 2 6 0 2 , 3 2 5 8 , 1 1 0 2 4 , 4 1 6 7 5 . 0 6 % 7 , 0 9 9 Po l i c e C o p i e r E x p e n s e 21 , 3 0 6 0 1 , 3 6 1 4 , 6 0 4 1 6 , 7 0 2 7 8 . 3 9 % 9 , 2 4 5 Po l i c e E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 9 , 7 7 5 0 4 3 7 1 , 3 0 0 8 , 4 7 5 8 6 . 7 0 % 1 , 1 5 4 Po l i c e J a n i t o r i a l 60 , 3 9 0 0 0 4 , 6 5 8 5 5 , 7 3 2 9 2 . 2 8 % 1 3 , 9 7 5 Po l i c e S a f e t y E x p e n s e 3, 6 8 4 0 0 1 3 9 3 , 5 4 5 9 6 . 2 2 % 6 4 2 Po l i c e S h o p S u p p l i e s 2, 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 4 7 5 5 2 5 2 6 . 2 2 % 1 , 1 6 3 39 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 4 2 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Po l i c e F u e l s - G a s 28 8 , 0 0 0 0 1 5 , 6 7 3 5 4 , 0 4 1 2 3 3 , 9 5 9 8 1 . 2 3 % 2 9 , 4 8 8 Po l i c e C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 10 7 , 4 8 0 0 1 , 8 7 2 9 , 5 0 6 9 7 , 9 7 4 9 1 . 1 5 % 2 0 , 6 4 1 Po l i c e M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 4, 0 5 0 0 8 3 1 1 , 7 0 6 2 , 3 4 4 5 7 . 8 8 % 1 6 , 2 2 1 Po l i c e D a t a A c c e s s E x p e n s e 1, 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Po l i c e I n v e s t i g a t i o n E x p e n s e s 1 1 , 0 0 0 0 5 4 3 2 , 9 4 6 8 , 0 5 4 7 3 . 2 1 % 1 , 4 0 2 Po l i c e K - 9 E x p e n s e s 6, 0 0 0 7 , 0 0 0 1 , 1 3 3 1 , 9 7 7 1 1 , 0 2 3 8 4 . 7 9 % 7 , 3 1 1 Po l i c e C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 1 1 , 9 0 0 3 9 4 4 7 6 1 , 0 0 0 1 1 , 2 9 4 9 1 . 8 6 % 3 , 2 2 6 Po l i c e B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 4 2 , 7 5 4 0 6 2 1 3 , 2 5 8 2 9 , 4 9 6 6 8 . 9 8 % 1 9 , 8 9 1 Po l i c e P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 3 , 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 4 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 , 9 4 5 Po l i c e V e h i c l e R e p a i r 76 , 0 0 0 0 6 , 9 5 9 1 8 , 7 1 7 5 7 , 2 8 3 7 5 . 3 7 % 1 2 , 8 4 1 Po l i c e V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 1 2 , 4 5 0 0 1 1 , 3 1 6 2 5 , 1 0 6 8 7 , 3 4 4 7 7 . 6 7 % 1 0 , 4 7 8 Po l i c e E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 5 0 0 0 0 8 0 4 2 0 8 4 . 0 0 % 9 8 6 Po l i c e S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 2 2 8 , 1 8 1 0 2 , 2 3 9 1 3 3 , 0 9 7 9 5 , 0 8 3 4 1 . 6 7 % 1 0 6 , 9 3 9 Po l i c e A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 4 , 4 9 1 0 0 0 4 , 4 9 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 5 0 Po l i c e M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 2, 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 5 Po l i c e F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 7 9 Po l i c e E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 6 0 , 3 4 5 0 6 , 6 1 8 1 9 , 1 2 2 4 1 , 2 2 3 6 8 . 3 1 % 3 5 , 8 4 3 Po l i c e A m m u n i t i o n & F i r e a r m s 8 4 , 6 0 0 0 9 , 1 8 1 2 5 , 0 7 6 5 9 , 5 2 4 7 0 . 3 5 % 1 5 , 2 4 3 Po l i c e S W A T E q u i p m e n t 19 , 0 0 0 (1 1 , 0 0 0 ) 48 2 , 8 2 9 5 , 1 7 1 6 4 . 6 4 % 7 3 Po l i c e E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 1 5 , 3 8 7 0 1 6 4 1 , 2 0 8 1 4 , 1 7 9 9 2 . 1 4 % 2 , 2 8 1 Po l i c e S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 11 , 1 0 8 0 0 0 1 1 , 1 0 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Po l i c e F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 6 , 4 4 3 0 0 1 6 3 1 6 , 2 8 0 9 9 . 0 0 % 4 , 1 7 3 Po l i c e C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 3 2 , 2 5 0 0 0 0 3 2 , 2 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 , 1 0 5 Po l i c e P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 3 3 , 1 7 0 (1 , 0 7 2 ) 57 7 1 6 , 9 2 6 1 5 , 1 7 2 4 7 . 2 6 % 2 0 , 2 1 3 Po l i c e L e g a l S e r v i c e s - P r o s e c u t i o n 4 3 0 , 1 8 7 0 3 5 , 9 7 1 1 0 7 , 9 1 2 3 2 2 , 2 7 5 7 4 . 9 1 % 8 9 , 9 2 6 Po l i c e P r e v e n t a t i v e H e a l t h E x p 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 8 2 Po l i c e B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 7 , 6 0 0 0 1 , 4 0 8 2 , 3 6 4 5 , 2 3 6 6 8 . 8 9 % 2 , 8 2 5 Po l i c e C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 3 8 1 , 1 3 2 9 , 5 2 8 9 7 , 6 6 5 9 7 , 6 6 5 2 9 2 , 9 9 5 7 5 . 0 0 % 9 5 , 2 8 3 Po l i c e T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 15 , 1 5 2 0 6 6 4 1 , 9 8 9 1 3 , 1 6 3 8 6 . 8 7 % 3 , 2 6 6 Po l i c e P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 10 , 6 0 0 0 5 2 1 1 , 9 9 2 8 , 6 0 8 8 1 . 2 0 % 3 , 0 9 2 Po l i c e R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 4 6 , 2 8 6 0 2 , 0 5 3 3 , 9 4 4 4 2 , 3 4 2 9 1 . 4 7 % 1 2 , 2 4 4 Po l i c e I L E T S N e t w o r k 12 , 5 0 0 0 0 3 , 1 2 5 9 , 3 7 5 7 5 . 0 0 % 3 , 1 2 5 Po l i c e C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 87 , 3 6 0 0 5 , 2 6 5 1 6 , 7 8 6 7 0 , 5 7 4 8 0 . 7 8 % 1 6 , 1 2 9 Po l i c e B u s i n e s s M e a l s 3, 5 0 0 0 1 8 5 6 7 2 , 9 3 3 8 3 . 7 9 % 5 4 4 Po l i c e M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 , 9 5 0 0 0 2 1 4 1 , 7 3 6 8 9 . 0 2 % 1 8 6 Po l i c e E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 7 6 , 7 0 8 6 2 , 0 0 0 1 7 , 5 8 5 4 8 , 9 8 6 8 9 , 7 2 2 6 4 . 6 8 % 2 9 , 7 1 4 Po l i c e T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 2 2 , 6 2 0 0 3 , 8 6 0 8 , 1 9 8 1 4 , 4 2 2 6 3 . 7 5 % 5 , 4 4 2 Po l i c e T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 43 , 6 2 5 0 1 , 8 8 1 1 1 , 0 7 4 3 2 , 5 5 1 7 4 . 6 1 % 7 , 2 1 7 Po l i c e T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 22 , 6 2 0 0 2 , 9 1 2 7 , 6 7 6 1 4 , 9 4 4 6 6 . 0 6 % 2 , 9 5 3 Po l i c e A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 1 3 , 0 0 0 0 3 7 5 5 , 4 8 7 7 , 5 1 3 5 7 . 7 9 % 4 , 8 9 8 Po l i c e L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 5 Po l i c e P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 20 , 5 0 0 0 1 2 3 2 , 6 6 4 1 7 , 8 3 6 8 7 . 0 0 % 2 , 9 4 2 Po l i c e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 1 3 2 , 9 7 6 0 0 6 6 , 5 2 0 6 6 , 4 5 6 4 9 . 9 7 % 6 5 , 9 4 6 Po l i c e E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 5 5 , 0 0 0 0 3 , 1 5 1 9 , 1 9 3 4 5 , 8 0 7 8 3 . 2 8 % 9 , 3 9 3 Po l i c e I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 20 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 1 3 9 1 , 5 9 6 1 8 , 4 0 4 9 2 . 0 1 % 1 , 8 1 5 Po l i c e S a n i t a r y S e r v i c e s 30 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Po l i c e E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 6 2 5 0 0 0 6 2 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Po l i c e D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 1 1 , 0 0 8 0 4 0 0 3 , 2 3 2 7 , 7 7 6 7 0 . 6 3 % 2 , 4 9 4 Po l i c e I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 3, 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 3 5 9 6 4 1 2 1 . 3 7 % 2 , 6 0 7 Po l i c e H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 2, 2 6 5 0 2 , 0 9 9 2 , 0 9 9 1 6 6 7 . 3 3 % 1 , 7 8 4 40 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 4 3 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Po l i c e P r o p e r t y A b a t e m e n t 5, 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 2 5 Po l i c e E m p l o y e e L o n g e v i t y a w a r d s 0 0 0 4 5 (4 5 ) 0.00% 0 Po l i c e D r u g S e i z u r e E n f o r c e m n t E x p 1 5 , 0 0 0 0 3, 5 6 7 4, 3 7 8 10 , 6 2 2 70.81%3,613 Po l i c e T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 2, 7 4 3 , 0 0 5 66 , 8 5 0 24 2 , 4 7 0 75 7 , 1 1 2 2, 0 5 2 , 7 4 3 73.06%717,709 Po l i c e Po l i c e Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Po l i c e C a p O u t l a y - B l d g s & S t r u c t 0 0 2 , 1 6 5 2 , 1 6 5 (2 , 1 6 5 ) 0.00% 0 Po l i c e C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 22 8 , 2 6 8 2 9 , 0 0 0 1 0 6 , 9 3 3 1 8 5 , 3 7 8 7 1 , 8 9 0 2 7 . 9 4 % 8 3 , 3 8 7 Po l i c e C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 77 , 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 , 0 1 2 6 4 , 0 8 8 8 3 . 1 2 % 2 0 , 0 0 0 Po l i c e P u b l i c S a f e t y T r a i n i n g C t r 6 2 , 0 0 0 (6 2 , 0 0 0 ) 1, 0 2 0 1, 0 2 0 (1 , 0 2 0 ) 0.00%0 Po l i c e T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 36 7 , 3 6 8 (3 3 , 0 0 0 ) 11 0 , 1 1 9 20 1 , 5 7 5 13 2 , 7 9 3 39.71%103,387 Po l i c e Po l i c e DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 20 , 0 8 6 , 6 4 7 41 , 0 7 0 1, 6 3 4 , 1 5 5 4, 8 7 1 , 8 9 6 15 , 2 5 5 , 8 2 1 75.79%4,164,585 Po l i c e Po l i c e TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 20 , 0 8 6 , 6 4 7 41 , 0 7 0 1, 6 3 4 , 1 5 5 4, 8 7 1 , 8 9 6 15 , 2 5 5 , 8 2 1 75.79%4,164,585 41 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 4 4 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi r e 2 2 1 0 - F i r e D e p a r t m e n t Fi r e RE V E N U E S Fi r e F i r e I n s p e c t i o n & P e r m i t F e e s 0 0 4 7 5 2 , 6 7 8 (2 , 6 7 8 ) 0.00% 3,422 Fi r e R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 3 , 9 7 9 7 , 6 1 7 (7 , 6 1 7 ) 0.00% 14,006 Fi r e R e s t i t u t i o n 0 0 2 2 9 (2 9 ) 0.00% 26 Fi r e R u r a l F i r e & M i s c R e v e n u e 1 , 2 9 4 , 4 8 9 0 9 3 , 3 2 1 3 6 5 , 3 9 1 9 2 9 , 0 9 8 7 1 . 7 7 % 3 6 8 , 0 7 7 Fi r e I m p a c t R e v - M u l t i f a m i l y 1 1 9 , 1 1 4 0 1 1 9 , 1 7 5 2 1 4 , 5 1 5 (9 5 , 4 0 1 ) (80.09)% 127,848 Fi r e I m p a c t R e v - C o m m e r c i a l 6 0 , 0 0 0 0 6 9 , 3 3 3 1 5 0 , 7 4 1 (9 0 , 7 4 1 ) (151.23)% 40,907 Fi r e I m p a c t R e v - R e s i d e n t i a l 6 7 4 , 9 7 8 0 9 0 , 5 7 3 2 8 8 , 7 4 4 3 8 6 , 2 3 4 5 7 . 2 2 % 2 1 8 , 2 2 4 Fi r e D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 0 0 2 0 1 1 , 9 3 0 (1 1 , 9 3 0 ) 0.00% 11,536 Fi r e I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 0 0 15 , 9 2 7 43 , 0 3 3 (4 3 , 0 3 3 ) 0.00%0 Fi r e T o t a l R E V E N U E S 2, 1 4 8 , 5 8 1 0 39 2 , 8 0 6 1, 0 8 4 , 6 7 8 1, 0 6 3 , 9 0 3 49.52%784,046 Fi r e Fi r e PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Fi r e W a g e s 7, 4 5 1 , 6 8 6 0 5 9 3 , 6 4 2 1 , 6 4 5 , 2 7 8 5 , 8 0 6 , 4 0 8 7 7 . 9 2 % 1 , 5 8 3 , 0 8 4 Fi r e W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 1 8 , 0 1 8 0 2 8 6 2 8 6 1 7 , 7 3 2 9 8 . 4 1 % 2 , 4 2 1 Fi r e O v e r t i m e W a g e s 61 6 , 7 9 2 0 6 3 , 0 1 1 1 7 6 , 3 5 1 4 4 0 , 4 4 1 7 1 . 4 0 % 2 0 2 , 5 5 1 Fi r e F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 61 8 , 6 1 7 0 4 7 , 4 5 6 1 3 3 , 2 4 4 4 8 5 , 3 7 3 7 8 . 4 6 % 1 3 0 , 3 9 8 Fi r e P E R S I 98 8 , 9 7 0 0 7 6 , 5 5 4 2 1 2 , 2 7 0 7 7 6 , 7 0 0 7 8 . 5 3 % 2 0 7 , 9 6 0 Fi r e W o r k e r s ' C o m p 31 9 , 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 1 9 , 0 1 3 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 1 , 3 5 2 , 6 2 2 0 3 , 0 4 5 1 3 , 0 9 7 1 , 3 3 9 , 5 2 5 9 9 . 0 3 % 2 8 7 , 2 0 2 Fi r e U n e m p l o y m e n t 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 8 9 Fi r e M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 7 6 , 9 5 2 2 3 0 , 6 0 8 (2 3 0 , 6 0 8 ) 0.00% 0 Fi r e H S A / H R A V E B A C o n t r i b u t i o n s 0 0 1 0 , 7 2 5 3 2 , 1 7 5 (3 2 , 1 7 5 ) 0.00% 0 Fi r e V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 1 1 6 3 3 9 (3 3 9 ) 0.00% 0 Fi r e D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 6 , 9 0 3 2 0 , 6 9 1 (2 0 , 6 9 1 ) 0.00% 0 Fi r e L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 9 4 4 1 , 8 8 7 (1 , 8 8 7 ) 0.00% 0 Fi r e S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 , 3 4 1 2 , 6 7 2 (2 , 6 7 2 ) 0.00% 0 Fi r e L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 1 , 6 6 4 3 , 3 1 3 (3 , 3 1 3 ) 0.00% 0 Fi r e E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 32 3 64 6 (6 4 6 ) 0.00%0 Fi r e T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 11 , 3 6 5 , 7 1 8 0 88 2 , 9 6 2 2, 4 7 2 , 8 5 6 8, 8 9 2 , 8 6 3 78.24%2,414,005 Fi r e Fi r e OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Fi r e O f f i c e E x p e n s e 8, 3 5 0 0 7 4 1 2 , 1 9 9 6 , 1 5 1 7 3 . 6 6 % 1 , 1 5 3 Fi r e C o p i e r E x p e n s e 8, 6 7 1 0 5 2 6 1 , 1 7 5 7 , 4 9 6 8 6 . 4 4 % 1 , 2 6 0 Fi r e E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 5 , 7 0 0 0 7 8 7 1 , 5 1 4 4 , 1 8 6 7 3 . 4 4 % 1 , 2 7 2 Fi r e J a n i t o r i a l 12 , 2 8 3 0 8 9 9 2 , 4 1 8 9 , 8 6 5 8 0 . 3 1 % 2 , 1 8 4 Fi r e S a f e t y E x p e n s e 20 0 0 0 1 6 9 3 1 1 5 . 3 8 % 0 Fi r e S h o p S u p p l i e s 5, 2 0 0 0 4 9 7 4 5 4 , 4 5 5 8 5 . 6 7 % 1 , 2 6 4 Fi r e D i s p a t c h S e r v i c e 94 , 2 0 8 0 0 2 3 , 5 5 2 7 0 , 6 5 6 7 5 . 0 0 % 2 1 , 7 8 1 Fi r e F u e l s - G a s 95 , 6 5 0 0 5 , 0 6 0 1 8 , 6 9 1 7 6 , 9 5 9 8 0 . 4 5 % 1 1 , 9 7 1 Fi r e F u e l s - D i e s e l / P r o p a n e 2 , 2 5 0 0 4 5 9 1 , 4 5 6 7 9 4 3 5 . 2 9 % 2 9 8 Fi r e C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 69 , 5 0 0 0 3 6 0 6 , 1 6 9 6 3 , 3 3 1 9 1 . 1 2 % 4 8 , 9 5 1 Fi r e S C B A / B o t t l e s / C o T e s t e r 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 9 9 9 , 0 8 8 1 0 , 9 1 2 5 4 . 5 5 % 1 , 3 3 6 Fi r e M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 15 , 0 0 0 0 5 2 5 0 0 1 4 , 5 0 0 9 6 . 6 6 % 6 , 5 3 4 Fi r e J P A M e d i c a l S v c & S u p p l i e s 3 4 , 2 6 0 0 0 0 3 4 , 2 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 1 5 7 1 , 3 4 3 8 9 . 5 3 % 1 3 6 Fi r e B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 1 2 5 , 0 4 7 1 1 , 0 0 0 5 , 3 6 7 1 1 , 6 9 4 1 2 4 , 3 5 3 9 1 . 4 0 % 1 0 , 2 8 7 Fi r e P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 1 , 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 6 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 42 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 4 5 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi r e V e h i c l e R e p a i r 71 , 8 0 0 0 1 4 , 2 9 0 4 1 , 3 7 4 3 0 , 4 2 6 4 2 . 3 7 % 1 1 , 6 2 9 Fi r e V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 53 , 5 0 0 0 7 , 3 4 5 1 0 , 7 9 4 4 2 , 7 0 6 7 9 . 8 2 % 1 2 , 9 0 0 Fi r e E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 3 9 , 0 4 0 0 6 9 5 5 , 5 5 4 3 3 , 4 8 6 8 5 . 7 7 % 3 , 8 9 3 Fi r e G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 62 5 0 0 0 6 2 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 6 7 , 5 5 7 0 3 , 8 4 5 3 3 , 3 8 8 3 4 , 1 6 9 5 0 . 5 7 % 1 9 , 4 2 7 Fi r e A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 9 , 1 8 7 0 9 2 4 9 5 8 , 6 9 2 9 4 . 6 0 % 1 , 6 7 5 Fi r e F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 1, 0 5 0 0 4 9 3 4 9 3 5 5 7 5 3 . 0 6 % 2 2 2 Fi r e E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 9 1 , 4 5 0 0 1 , 8 9 3 1 2 , 5 0 5 7 8 , 9 4 5 8 6 . 3 2 % 3 3 , 3 9 0 Fi r e T u r n o u t E q u i p m e n t 10 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 1 2 7 2 , 6 9 3 9 7 , 3 0 7 9 7 . 3 0 % 4 0 , 5 1 4 Fi r e E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 1 9 , 6 5 0 0 1 2 3 9 , 3 3 5 1 0 , 3 1 5 5 2 . 4 9 % 1 0 2 Fi r e S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 75 0 0 0 0 7 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 7 , 6 5 0 0 1 , 0 3 3 1 , 8 9 6 5 , 7 5 4 7 5 . 2 1 % 4 , 7 3 6 Fi r e C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 1 2 , 0 0 0 0 1 7 2 1 7 2 1 1 , 8 2 9 9 8 . 5 7 % 0 Fi r e P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 2 9 , 3 4 0 (6 , 0 9 3 ) 0 7 , 0 0 2 1 6 , 2 4 6 6 9 . 8 8 % 5 , 2 5 0 Fi r e P r e v e n t a t i v e H e a l t h E x p 4 5 , 7 0 5 0 0 0 4 5 , 7 0 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 0 3 7 Fi r e B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 1 4 , 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 , 8 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 , 2 2 7 Fi r e T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 7, 3 1 8 0 7 3 6 1 , 9 1 7 5 , 4 0 1 7 3 . 8 0 % 1 , 3 3 9 Fi r e P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 2, 2 8 2 0 1 1 5 5 7 9 1 , 7 0 3 7 4 . 6 2 % 1 , 3 8 8 Fi r e R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 1 2 , 8 2 9 0 0 1 3 0 1 2 , 6 9 9 9 8 . 9 8 % 7 8 Fi r e C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 15 , 2 0 0 0 1 , 0 5 4 3 , 1 4 3 1 2 , 0 5 7 7 9 . 3 2 % 3 , 4 8 8 Fi r e R e c r u i t m e n t E x p e n s e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 2 Fi r e B u s i n e s s M e a l s 2, 0 0 0 0 1 8 3 6 8 6 1 , 3 1 4 6 5 . 6 8 % 1 3 6 Fi r e M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 5 1 , 7 5 8 6 , 8 9 5 3 4 7 1 1 , 6 9 5 4 6 , 9 5 8 8 0 . 0 6 % 2 1 , 4 5 6 Fi r e T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 4 , 8 7 5 0 1 6 0 1 , 7 2 4 1 3 , 1 5 1 8 8 . 4 1 % 2 , 4 8 5 Fi r e T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 33 , 1 9 0 0 5 6 1 4 , 7 0 2 2 8 , 4 8 8 8 5 . 8 3 % 9 , 3 2 9 Fi r e T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 15 , 7 2 0 0 2 1 4 2 , 4 3 5 1 3 , 2 8 5 8 4 . 5 1 % 2 , 1 2 2 Fi r e C i t y T r a i n i n g C l a s s e s 6 , 9 6 9 0 6 8 4 7 2 6 6 , 2 4 3 8 9 . 5 8 % 1 , 4 6 8 Fi r e A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 7 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 9 8 6 5 , 0 1 4 7 1 . 6 2 % 6 5 Fi r e P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 2, 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 2 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 9 3 , 4 4 2 0 0 4 1 , 5 2 1 5 1 , 9 2 1 5 5 . 5 6 % 3 9 , 5 9 7 Fi r e E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 3 3 , 5 0 0 0 1 , 9 6 7 5 , 9 0 7 2 7 , 5 9 3 8 2 . 3 6 % 6 , 3 2 3 Fi r e I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 22 , 2 0 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 2 , 6 0 5 1 9 , 5 9 5 8 8 . 2 6 % 2 , 7 9 4 Fi r e E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 4 , 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 , 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 , 1 6 9 Fi r e D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 2 8 , 2 5 6 (6 , 8 9 5 ) 20 0 3 , 9 4 2 1 7 , 4 1 9 8 1 . 5 4 % 7 , 5 4 4 Fi r e I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 1, 7 0 0 0 0 7 7 5 9 2 5 5 4 . 4 2 % 7 9 3 Fi r e H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 1, 3 9 5 0 0 1, 3 9 5 0 0.00%1,380 Fi r e T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 1, 4 1 9 , 7 5 7 4, 9 0 7 55 , 5 2 7 29 1 , 0 9 8 1, 1 3 3 , 5 6 6 79.57%353,443 Fi r e Fi r e Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Fi r e C a p O u t l a y - B l d g s & S t r u c t 3 , 8 9 9 , 2 0 1 (2 1 8 , 6 1 5 ) 81 , 0 1 6 1 3 6 , 1 6 8 3 , 5 4 4 , 4 1 8 9 6 . 3 0 % 7 5 Fi r e C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 10 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Fi r e C a p i t a l - F i r e T r u c k s 1 , 2 0 8 , 9 4 4 (1 , 1 7 2 , 5 5 1 ) ( 7 7 8 ) 10 , 8 6 5 2 5 , 5 2 8 7 0 . 1 4 % 0 Fi r e C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 1 8 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 , 0 0 0 100.00%0 Fi r e T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 5, 3 8 8 , 1 4 5 (1 , 3 9 1 , 1 6 6 ) 80 , 2 3 8 14 7 , 0 3 3 3, 8 4 9 , 9 4 6 96.32%75 Fi r e Fi r e DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 18 , 1 7 3 , 6 2 0 (1 , 3 8 6 , 2 5 9 ) 1, 0 1 8 , 7 2 7 2, 9 1 0 , 9 8 7 13 , 8 7 6 , 3 7 5 82.65%2,767,522 Fi r e 43 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 4 6 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Fi r e Tr a n s f e r s Fi r e P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e - I N 3 0 , 5 2 0 0 2 , 3 3 8 6 , 9 2 0 2 3 , 6 0 0 7 7 . 3 2 % 2 , 3 7 4 Fi r e O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e - I N 6 3 , 9 6 0 0 1, 7 4 6 10 , 0 4 9 53 , 9 1 1 84.28%11,933 Fi r e T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 94 , 4 8 0 0 4, 0 8 4 16 , 9 6 8 77 , 5 1 2 82.04%14,308 Fi r e Fi r e TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 18 , 2 6 8 , 1 0 0 (1 , 3 8 6 , 2 5 9 ) 1, 0 2 2 , 8 1 1 2, 9 2 7 , 9 5 5 13 , 9 5 3 , 8 8 6 82.65%2,781,829 44 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 4 7 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Pa r k s 2 2 5 0 - P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n Pa r k s RE V E N U E S Pa r k s G r a n t R e v e n u e s 0 4 7 3 , 4 9 2 0 0 4 7 3 , 4 9 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 3 0 , 0 0 0 2 7 6 , 0 0 0 0 7 , 8 6 0 2 9 8 , 1 4 0 9 7 . 4 3 % 8 , 9 6 4 Pa r k s M e r i d i a n D o w n t o w n D e v e l o p m e n t 2 5 , 0 0 0 0 (2 4 8 , 5 6 2 ) 25 , 9 1 2 (9 1 2 ) (3.64)% 0 Pa r k s R e n t a l I n c o m e 0 0 3 , 4 5 6 2 8 , 3 6 8 (2 8 , 3 6 8 ) 0.00% 29,072 Pa r k s C h e r r y L a n e G o l f L e a s e R e v e n u e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 , 0 0 0 Pa r k s P a r k R e s e r v a t i o n s F e e R e v e n u e 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 9 , 3 0 3 3 7 , 9 9 5 1 1 2 , 0 0 5 7 4 . 6 7 % 2 9 , 4 6 5 Pa r k s R e c r e a t i o n C l a s s R e v e n u e s 2 2 9 , 4 6 0 0 1 7 , 8 5 7 2 8 , 0 3 0 2 0 1 , 4 3 0 8 7 . 7 8 % 2 9 , 6 8 8 Pa r k s C o m m u n i t y E v e n t R e v / S p o n s o r s h i p 3 0 , 0 0 0 0 5 6 1 1 1 , 5 6 4 1 8 , 4 3 6 6 1 . 4 5 % 1 4 , 1 9 5 Pa r k s S p o r t s R e v e n u e 25 6 , 5 3 0 0 5 8 , 9 9 8 8 0 , 1 4 0 1 7 6 , 3 9 0 6 8 . 7 6 % 5 9 , 3 0 5 Pa r k s I m p a c t R e v - M u l t i f a m i l y 1 6 5 , 8 9 9 0 1 9 4 , 7 7 5 3 5 0 , 5 9 5 (1 8 4 , 6 9 6 ) (111.33)% 178,065 Pa r k s I m p a c t R e v - R e s i d e n t i a l 1 , 3 2 3 , 7 2 0 0 1 4 8 , 0 2 9 4 7 1 , 9 1 2 8 5 1 , 8 0 8 6 4 . 3 4 % 4 2 7 , 9 6 5 Pa r k s C o n t r a c t S e r v i c e R e v e n u e s 7 , 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 6 , 9 0 9 9 8 . 7 0 % 4 4 5 Pa r k s D o n a t i o n s ( p l u s p r o j e c t c o d e ) 0 0 0 3 9 2 (3 9 2 ) 0.00% 800 Pa r k s M i s c e l l a n e o u s R e v e n u e s 0 0 2 0 5 2 0 5 (2 0 5 ) 0.00% 280 Pa r k s I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 15 , 0 0 0 0 9 , 7 5 8 3 6 , 9 4 5 (2 1 , 9 4 5 ) (146.29)% 42,842 Pa r k s S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 1, 9 5 1 1, 9 5 1 (1 , 9 5 1 ) 0.00%0 Pa r k s T o t a l R E V E N U E S 2, 2 3 2 , 6 0 9 74 9 , 4 9 2 20 6 , 3 3 1 1, 0 8 1 , 9 6 0 1, 9 0 0 , 1 4 2 63.72%827,085 Pa r k s Pa r k s PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Pa r k s W a g e s 1, 4 5 9 , 9 4 4 3 9 , 5 2 0 1 2 0 , 3 5 3 3 4 9 , 6 8 9 1 , 1 4 9 , 7 7 5 7 6 . 6 7 % 3 3 0 , 7 5 4 Pa r k s W a g e s - S e a s o n a l / P a r t t i m e 6 2 7 , 1 6 0 5 1 , 7 7 3 1 3 , 7 7 1 8 5 , 2 4 7 5 9 3 , 6 8 6 8 7 . 4 4 % 7 5 , 1 8 0 Pa r k s O v e r t i m e W a g e s 48 , 5 7 5 3 , 0 0 0 1 , 9 4 3 5 , 1 2 3 4 6 , 4 5 2 9 0 . 0 6 % 7 , 1 0 5 Pa r k s F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 16 3 , 3 7 9 7 , 2 5 2 9 , 9 9 3 3 2 , 2 5 6 1 3 8 , 3 7 5 8 1 . 0 9 % 3 0 , 3 1 2 Pa r k s P E R S I 18 0 , 1 1 7 1 0 , 0 3 2 1 3 , 8 0 9 3 9 , 8 3 1 1 5 0 , 3 1 8 7 9 . 0 5 % 4 0 , 2 2 0 Pa r k s W o r k e r s ' C o m p 61 , 2 4 9 2 , 3 9 2 0 0 6 3 , 6 4 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 7 1 4 , 3 0 6 1 5 , 0 2 9 9 8 5 5 , 3 8 5 7 2 3 , 9 5 0 9 9 . 2 6 % 9 8 , 1 0 3 Pa r k s U n e m p l o y m e n t 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 , 0 6 4 Pa r k s M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 7 , 4 2 6 8 9 , 9 0 2 (8 9 , 9 0 2 ) 0.00% 0 Pa r k s V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 3 4 7 1 , 1 6 0 (1 , 1 6 0 ) 0.00% 0 Pa r k s D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 , 1 5 5 7 , 2 0 8 (7 , 2 0 8 ) 0.00% 0 Pa r k s L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 6 9 8 0 4 (8 0 4 ) 0.00% 0 Pa r k s S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 2 5 6 7 2 (6 7 2 ) 0.00% 0 Pa r k s L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 9 8 8 2 4 (8 2 4 ) 0.00% 0 Pa r k s E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 21 0 46 3 (4 6 3 ) 0.00%0 Pa r k s T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 3, 2 5 4 , 7 3 0 12 8 , 9 9 8 19 2 , 0 8 3 61 8 , 5 6 4 2, 7 6 5 , 1 6 4 81.72%587,739 Pa r k s Pa r k s OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Pa r k s O f f i c e E x p e n s e 6, 5 3 2 1 2 7 2 8 5 1 , 2 1 6 5 , 4 4 3 8 1 . 7 3 % 1 , 9 7 1 Pa r k s C o p i e r E x p e n s e 8, 0 3 1 0 4 9 0 8 8 5 7 , 1 4 6 8 8 . 9 8 % 9 4 4 Pa r k s S p r a y i n g / F e r t i l i z e r 81 , 0 9 4 5 , 6 7 7 0 3 , 9 9 9 8 2 , 7 7 2 9 5 . 3 9 % 3 , 1 3 1 Pa r k s E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 3 , 5 4 0 0 7 4 6 7 2 2 , 8 6 8 8 1 . 0 3 % 9 5 Pa r k s J a n i t o r i a l 49 , 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 , 9 6 6 4 5 , 5 3 4 9 1 . 9 8 % 1 1 , 7 7 9 Pa r k s R e s t r o o m S u p p l i e s 31 , 2 2 8 2 , 4 8 5 2 , 3 5 6 2 , 9 4 7 3 0 , 7 6 6 9 1 . 2 5 % 1 2 , 8 4 4 Pa r k s S a f e t y E x p e n s e 3, 2 7 1 2 6 8 0 1 , 6 0 7 1 , 9 3 2 5 4 . 5 8 % 6 7 7 Pa r k s S h o p S u p p l i e s 8, 0 0 0 4 9 1 1 , 7 1 7 3 , 0 4 7 5 , 4 4 4 6 4 . 1 1 % 2 , 8 5 2 Pa r k s F u e l s - G a s 68 , 8 2 5 3 , 9 9 5 1 , 9 6 6 1 2 , 0 6 2 6 0 , 7 5 8 8 3 . 4 3 % 9 , 1 0 8 Pa r k s C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 6, 7 3 6 9 6 2 7 2 0 1 , 0 4 3 6 , 6 5 5 8 6 . 4 5 % 6 9 6 45 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 4 8 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Pa r k s M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 1, 5 0 0 2 5 1 2 9 2 6 3 1 , 2 6 2 8 2 . 7 7 % 3 0 Pa r k s R e c r e a t i o n C l a s s E x p e n s e 2 9 , 4 5 0 0 0 0 2 9 , 4 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s R e c r e a t i o n S p o r t s E x p e n s e s 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 (1 2 , 0 1 5 ) 9, 4 5 1 3 0 , 2 2 2 9 7 , 7 6 3 7 6 . 3 8 % 3 0 , 1 8 8 Pa r k s C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 5 9 , 8 0 0 0 1 1 0 6 , 9 3 5 5 2 , 8 6 5 8 8 . 4 0 % 2 , 6 5 7 Pa r k s B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 1 0 4 , 5 2 9 3 , 0 4 1 6 , 7 6 5 1 6 , 3 7 9 9 1 , 1 9 1 8 4 . 7 7 % 1 0 , 8 3 6 Pa r k s P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 4 9 , 6 1 8 2 , 0 0 2 0 0 5 1 , 6 2 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 3 9 Pa r k s V e h i c l e R e p a i r 16 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 7 4 3 5 , 2 5 2 1 1 , 7 4 8 6 9 . 1 0 % 2 , 9 6 8 Pa r k s V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 16 , 0 0 0 4 5 0 1 , 0 0 2 5 , 1 9 4 1 1 , 2 5 7 6 8 . 4 2 % 5 , 1 9 1 Pa r k s E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 4 3 , 6 0 5 3 , 8 3 9 5 , 0 7 7 1 0 , 5 9 3 3 6 , 8 5 1 7 7 . 6 7 % 1 5 , 0 3 1 Pa r k s F o r e s t r y E x p e n s e 65 , 8 5 8 3 , 8 7 2 0 1 2 , 6 0 6 5 7 , 1 2 4 8 1 . 9 2 % 8 , 0 9 8 Pa r k s D o w n t o w n T r e e M a i n t e n a n c e 7 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 7 0 8 Pa r k s G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 2 3 2 , 3 9 8 1 4 , 5 9 3 4 , 7 7 3 4 1 , 7 1 1 2 0 5 , 2 8 0 8 3 . 1 1 % 4 5 , 0 6 0 Pa r k s V a n d a l i s m C l e a n u p E x p 4 , 1 5 8 9 6 0 0 4 , 2 5 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 5 0 Pa r k s S u r f a c e W e l l M a i n t 22 , 4 0 3 9 3 3 6 0 6 0 2 3 , 2 7 6 9 9 . 7 4 % 7 8 8 Pa r k s S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 1 1 , 8 5 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 8 , 7 7 5 3 , 0 7 5 2 5 . 9 5 % 7 3 8 Pa r k s A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 2 , 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 6 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 3, 0 0 0 0 2 , 3 5 4 2 , 3 5 4 6 4 6 2 1 . 5 2 % 0 Pa r k s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S e r v i c e s 9 , 0 0 0 0 0 9 , 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 , 0 0 0 Pa r k s F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 9, 2 5 7 7 9 0 1 7 9 1 7 9 9 , 8 6 8 9 8 . 2 1 % 1 , 0 7 1 Pa r k s E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 4 3 , 0 3 4 2 , 9 0 0 1 9 3 1 3 , 3 4 8 3 2 , 5 8 6 7 0 . 9 4 % 1 6 , 1 6 6 Pa r k s E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 1 7 , 2 9 9 1 , 0 6 5 0 1 , 1 6 4 1 7 , 2 0 0 9 3 . 6 5 % 1 , 6 8 0 Pa r k s S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 1, 1 2 9 0 0 0 1 , 1 2 9 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 3 , 8 1 5 Pa r k s F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 3 , 0 8 2 0 3 2 3 1 , 0 7 5 2 , 0 0 7 6 5 . 1 1 % 9 0 2 Pa r k s C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 6 , 9 0 0 0 0 1 2 7 6 , 7 7 3 9 8 . 1 6 % 0 Pa r k s P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 5 8 , 8 0 0 (9 , 8 5 6 ) 0 1 1 , 3 2 6 3 7 , 6 1 7 7 6 . 8 5 % 0 Pa r k s I n v e s t m e n t S e r v i c e s 0 0 1 9 1 5 7 2 (5 7 2 ) 0.00% 569 Pa r k s C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 11 0 , 0 0 0 0 9 , 1 2 5 2 2 , 9 9 0 8 7 , 0 1 0 7 9 . 1 0 % 2 5 , 8 8 1 Pa r k s B a c k g r o u n d / E m p l o y m e n t T e s t i n g 2 , 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 9 8 9 9 4 . 7 1 % 5 6 Pa r k s C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 1 9 9 , 5 5 8 0 3 , 7 5 6 4 3 , 0 8 5 1 5 6 , 4 7 3 7 8 . 4 0 % 3 0 , 7 3 1 Pa r k s T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 1, 0 1 0 0 9 0 2 7 1 7 3 9 7 3 . 1 4 % 2 9 1 Pa r k s P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1, 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 9 0 1 1 0 1 1 . 0 4 % 8 3 3 Pa r k s R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 4 , 8 7 2 0 3 4 9 9 5 7 3 , 9 1 5 8 0 . 3 4 % 5 9 6 Pa r k s C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 20 , 2 8 0 1 , 5 7 8 1 , 1 3 0 3 , 5 2 4 1 8 , 3 3 4 8 3 . 8 7 % 3 , 5 8 9 Pa r k s B u s i n e s s M e a l s 40 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 5 5 0 0 2 6 7 3 4 7 7 8 6 . 8 0 % 0 Pa r k s E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 2 1 , 4 3 2 4 9 2 0 5 , 2 9 3 1 6 , 6 3 1 7 5 . 8 5 % 4 , 5 4 2 Pa r k s T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 6 , 5 7 6 0 0 5 4 8 6 , 0 2 8 9 1 . 6 7 % 0 Pa r k s T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 5, 9 9 5 0 0 7 7 3 5 , 2 2 3 8 7 . 1 1 % 0 Pa r k s T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 1, 4 6 9 0 0 2 8 8 1 , 1 8 1 8 0 . 3 9 % 0 Pa r k s A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 1 1 , 0 0 0 0 1 6 9 2 8 9 1 0 , 7 1 1 9 7 . 3 7 % 7 8 6 Pa r k s L e g a l N o t i c e s 60 0 0 0 4 4 5 1 5 5 2 5 . 8 5 % 2 4 4 Pa r k s P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 27 , 6 0 0 0 4 5 5 4 , 0 5 2 2 3 , 5 4 8 8 5 . 3 1 % 7 , 5 6 8 Pa r k s I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 1 9 , 7 6 7 1 9 2 0 9 , 0 0 8 1 0 , 9 5 1 5 4 . 8 6 % 8 , 4 2 6 Pa r k s E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 1 9 0 , 8 1 7 8 , 3 2 8 1 3 , 1 5 5 3 6 , 2 4 6 1 6 2 , 8 9 9 8 1 . 7 9 % 3 5 , 5 4 9 Pa r k s I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 23 , 7 8 7 (5 0 ) 1, 3 2 2 1 , 9 2 2 2 1 , 8 1 5 9 1 . 9 0 % 1 , 6 9 8 Pa r k s E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 6 2 , 3 3 8 3 , 1 8 9 1 , 7 0 8 1 2 , 8 7 6 5 2 , 6 5 1 8 0 . 3 5 % 1 0 , 0 1 0 Pa r k s D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 9 , 6 6 6 0 0 4 , 5 7 0 5 , 0 9 6 5 2 . 7 2 % 5 , 1 2 2 Pa r k s C o m m i s s i o n E x p e n s e 1, 0 0 0 0 3 5 2 8 8 7 1 2 7 1 . 2 3 % 1 7 9 Pa r k s I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 54 , 2 8 8 3 , 9 0 0 0 4 1 , 7 5 4 1 6 , 4 3 4 2 8 . 2 4 % 4 1 , 6 1 7 Pa r k s A D A C o m p l i a n c e 24 0 , 3 4 3 (3 2 , 4 9 6 ) 65 , 3 5 9 7 7 , 8 0 9 1 3 0 , 0 3 8 6 2 . 5 6 % 1 , 3 5 9 46 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 4 9 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Pa r k s H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 43 , 2 9 0 0 9 , 6 4 7 3 3 , 8 6 5 9 , 4 2 5 2 1 . 7 7 % 3 3 , 9 5 4 Pa r k s V o l u n t e e r e x p e n s e 2, 5 0 0 0 2 1 5 8 1 1 , 9 1 9 7 6 . 7 6 % 3 1 5 Pa r k s B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 2 5 , 0 0 0 0 2, 2 7 7 3, 5 6 3 21 , 4 3 7 85.74%2,541 Pa r k s T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 2, 3 8 0 , 2 6 4 11 , 8 7 3 15 5 , 8 8 2 51 4 , 6 4 6 1, 8 7 7 , 4 9 1 78.49%427,670 Pa r k s Pa r k s Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Pa r k s C a p O u t l a y - B l d g s & S t r u c t 6 3 4 , 1 8 1 (6 3 4 , 1 8 1 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s B u i l d i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s 8 4 4 , 9 2 7 5 5 4 , 1 8 1 0 0 1 , 3 9 9 , 1 0 8 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s P a t h w a y d e v e l o p m e n t 6 2 1 , 8 5 3 4 2 2 , 0 9 8 1 , 2 8 0 7 , 2 9 3 1 , 0 3 6 , 6 5 8 9 9 . 3 0 % 1 0 , 4 6 5 Pa r k s I m p r o v e m e n t s @ S t o r e y P a r k 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 6 3 , 6 3 2 Pa r k s S t r e e t s c a p e i r r i g a t i o n l a n d s c a p i n g 4 1 5 , 0 7 0 (2 9 9 , 6 3 4 ) ( 1 5 8 , 8 4 9 ) 48 , 7 0 3 6 6 , 7 3 3 5 7 . 8 0 % 0 Pa r k s B o r u p P r o p e r t y c o n s t r u c t i o n 1 5 5 , 1 6 1 (8 6 , 4 1 9 ) 0 1 0 , 9 8 3 5 7 , 7 5 9 8 4 . 0 2 % 6 1 4 Pa r k s C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 93 , 0 0 0 0 4 8 , 0 7 9 4 8 , 0 7 9 4 4 , 9 2 1 4 8 . 3 0 % 0 Pa r k s C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 2 3 0 , 6 7 2 (7 5 , 5 9 8 ) 0 0 1 5 5 , 0 7 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 0 , 5 1 9 Pa r k s C a p i t a l - C o m m u n i c a t i o n E q u i p m e n t 6 7 , 9 1 0 2 9 , 7 5 3 1 , 1 7 0 5 , 6 1 8 9 2 , 0 4 5 9 4 . 2 4 % 0 Pa r k s B e a r C r e e k D e v e l o p m e n t 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 0 , 4 1 5 Pa r k s S e t t l e r s P a r k c o n s t r u c t i o n 1 9 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 3 1 8 9 , 6 1 7 9 9 . 7 9 % 0 Pa r k s F u l l e r P a r k I m p r o v e m e n t s 0 9 0 , 9 7 7 0 1 , 8 2 0 8 9 , 1 5 7 9 7 . 9 9 % 0 Pa r k s K e i t h B i r d L e g a c y P a r k c o n s t r u c t i o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 3 3 , 9 6 9 Pa r k s K l e i n e r M e m o r i a l P a r k 1 4 1 , 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 4 1 , 1 1 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s D i s c o v e r y P a r k 5, 6 1 0 , 0 9 6 (1 , 7 7 9 , 9 5 1 ) 7, 9 9 3 7 5 6 , 2 1 6 3 , 0 7 3 , 9 2 9 8 0 . 2 5 % 1 5 8 , 4 4 8 Pa r k s R e t a H u s k e y P a r k 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 2 0 , 0 3 6 Pa r k s H i l l s d a l e P a r k 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%231,277 Pa r k s T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 9, 0 0 3 , 9 8 1 (1 , 7 7 8 , 7 7 5 ) (1 0 0 , 3 2 7 ) 87 9 , 0 9 5 6, 3 4 6 , 1 1 1 87.83%879,376 Pa r k s Pa r k s DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 14 , 6 3 8 , 9 7 5 (1 , 6 3 7 , 9 0 4 ) 24 7 , 6 3 8 2, 0 1 2 , 3 0 5 10 , 9 8 8 , 7 6 6 84.52%1,894,784 Pa r k s Pa r k s Pa r k s Tr a n s f e r s Pa r k s P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e - I N 1 9 , 7 6 8 0 1 , 5 1 4 4 , 4 8 2 1 5 , 2 8 6 7 7 . 3 2 % 1 , 5 3 8 Pa r k s O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T 6 , 4 2 4 0 0 0 6 , 4 2 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Pa r k s O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e - I N 3 5 , 0 0 2 0 1, 1 3 1 6, 5 0 9 28 , 4 9 3 81.40%7,729 Pa r k s T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 61 , 1 9 4 0 2, 6 4 5 10 , 9 9 0 50 , 2 0 4 82.04%9,267 Pa r k s Pa r k s TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 14 , 7 0 0 , 1 6 9 (1 , 6 3 7 , 9 0 4 ) 25 0 , 2 8 3 2, 0 2 3 , 2 9 5 11 , 0 3 8 , 9 6 9 84.51%1,904,051 47 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 5 0 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual PW 3 2 0 0 - P u b l i c W o r k s PW RE V E N U E S PW R e v i e w F e e s 30 0 , 0 0 0 0 6 , 5 8 9 6 1 , 4 4 9 2 3 8 , 5 5 1 7 9 . 5 1 % 5 3 , 2 7 5 PW Q L P E R e v i e w R e v e n u e 50 , 0 0 0 0 6 , 0 9 0 1 0 , 6 1 0 3 9 , 3 9 0 7 8 . 7 8 % 1 5 , 3 4 0 PW F i l i n g F e e s - R e v e n u e s 5 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW D e p t S v c F e e s 0 0 0 4 4 6 (4 4 6 ) 0.00% 188 PW R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 22 1 (2 2 1 ) 0.00%0 PW T o t a l R E V E N U E S 40 0 , 0 0 0 0 12 , 6 7 9 72 , 7 2 6 32 7 , 2 7 4 81.82%68,803 PW PW PE R S O N N E L C O S T S PW W a g e s 2, 7 2 3 , 2 3 7 5 9 , 8 2 1 2 1 2 , 3 3 2 6 3 9 , 9 0 5 2 , 1 4 3 , 1 5 3 7 7 . 0 0 % 5 8 0 , 2 8 4 PW O v e r t i m e W a g e s 15 , 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 1 1 4 , 2 8 9 9 5 . 2 6 % 1 , 0 0 8 PW F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 20 8 , 0 1 9 4 , 5 7 6 1 5 , 6 1 8 4 7 , 1 3 9 1 6 5 , 4 5 6 7 7 . 8 2 % 4 2 , 8 6 3 PW P E R S I 32 4 , 3 4 2 7 , 1 4 3 2 4 , 0 3 6 7 2 , 2 4 0 2 5 9 , 2 4 5 7 8 . 2 0 % 6 5 , 3 8 2 PW W o r k e r s ' C o m p 78 , 8 9 7 2 , 0 2 2 0 0 8 0 , 9 1 9 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 6 8 3 , 9 1 0 1 5 , 1 9 8 1 , 4 2 5 6 , 1 4 3 6 9 2 , 9 6 5 9 9 . 1 2 % 1 0 9 , 6 8 3 PW M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 6 , 7 2 0 1 1 0 , 2 3 4 (1 1 0 , 2 3 4 ) 0.00% 0 PW H S A / H R A V E B A C o n t r i b u t i o n s 0 0 0 3 3 3 (3 3 3 ) 0.00% 0 PW V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 4 7 0 1 , 4 0 8 (1 , 4 0 8 ) 0.00% 0 PW D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 , 9 7 5 8 , 9 0 5 (8 , 9 0 5 ) 0.00% 0 PW L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 4 8 2 9 6 3 (9 6 3 ) 0.00% 0 PW S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 5 4 0 1 , 0 6 1 (1 , 0 6 1 ) 0.00% 0 PW L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 7 1 7 1 , 3 6 1 (1 , 3 6 1 ) 0.00% 0 PW E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 16 7 33 1 (3 3 1 ) 0.00%0 PW T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 4, 0 3 3 , 4 0 5 88 , 7 6 0 29 5 , 4 8 2 89 0 , 7 3 5 3, 2 3 1 , 4 3 0 78.39%799,219 PW PW OP E R A T I N G C O S T S PW O f f i c e E x p e n s e 11 , 2 0 0 0 6 7 9 1 , 2 0 4 9 , 9 9 6 8 9 . 2 4 % 1 , 8 7 2 PW C o p i e r E x p e n s e 2, 8 8 0 0 1 5 1 6 8 2 2 , 1 9 8 7 6 . 3 0 % 2 , 1 7 5 PW E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 2 , 7 0 0 6 0 2 9 0 4 8 9 2 , 2 7 1 8 2 . 2 8 % 3 3 2 PW S a f e t y E x p e n s e 3, 9 0 0 0 1 2 6 3 8 9 3 , 5 1 1 9 0 . 0 3 % 8 3 4 PW F u e l s - G a s 12 , 8 0 0 0 1 , 1 1 1 3 , 6 7 6 9 , 1 2 4 7 1 . 2 8 % 1 , 7 5 2 PW C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 3, 0 0 0 0 4 6 9 5 7 4 2 , 4 2 6 8 0 . 8 6 % 6 0 7 PW C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 6 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW V e h i c l e R e p a i r 4, 3 5 0 0 0 1 5 6 4 , 1 9 4 9 6 . 4 2 % 4 1 3 PW V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 6, 0 0 0 0 8 5 4 3 5 5 , 5 6 5 9 2 . 7 4 % 2 7 1 PW S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 4 2 , 7 3 2 0 3 , 4 8 4 1 2 , 5 6 6 3 0 , 1 6 6 7 0 . 5 9 % 8 , 6 5 0 PW E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 2, 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 2 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 2 9 PW E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 2 0 , 4 6 6 2 2 0 2 , 8 8 1 3 , 2 4 0 1 7 , 4 4 6 8 4 . 3 3 % 1 3 7 PW S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 0 6 PW F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 , 1 2 6 0 7 6 7 6 1 , 0 5 0 9 3 . 2 4 % 0 PW C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 2 2 , 5 5 0 1 , 5 5 0 0 0 2 4 , 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 6 3 PW P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 2 2 2 , 1 0 0 (9 9 , 1 0 0 ) 4, 0 0 0 1 2 , 0 0 0 1 1 1 , 0 0 0 9 0 . 2 4 % 1 2 , 0 0 0 PW P r o f e s s i o n a l S v c - P W W a s t e w a t e r 4 3 6 , 0 0 0 (1 0 2 , 0 0 0 ) 1, 9 2 3 1 5 , 6 8 7 3 1 8 , 3 1 3 9 5 . 3 0 % 4 9 , 9 3 4 PW P r o f e s s i o n a l S v c - P W W a t e r 2 9 3 , 8 2 0 (9 9 , 2 7 9 ) 2, 9 9 1 1 9 , 0 5 5 1 7 5 , 4 8 6 9 0 . 2 0 % 1 6 , 7 6 7 PW P R O F E S S I O N A L S V C f o r Q L P E R e v i e w s 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 6 , 0 8 0 9 3 , 9 2 0 9 3 . 9 1 % 1 2 , 7 4 0 PW C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 5, 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW L e g a l S e r v i c e s 15 , 0 0 0 0 0 4 , 3 2 5 1 0 , 6 7 5 7 1 . 1 6 % 8 , 3 8 0 PW P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 1, 5 0 0 0 7 7 8 7 1 , 4 1 3 9 4 . 2 2 % 1 9 8 48 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 5 1 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual PW R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 2 , 9 0 4 0 2 6 3 7 4 8 2 , 1 5 6 7 4 . 2 3 % 9 6 2 PW C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 12 , 6 6 0 8 4 0 9 7 5 2 , 9 6 3 1 0 , 5 3 7 7 8 . 0 5 % 3 , 3 5 9 PW B u s i n e s s M e a l s 1, 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 7 0 9 7 . 0 0 % 1 1 1 PW M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 8 0 0 0 2 9 9 (1 1 9 ) (65.83)% 38 PW E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 8 3 , 4 1 6 8 0 0 1 , 1 7 4 1 3 , 3 1 1 7 0 , 9 0 5 8 4 . 1 9 % 5 , 0 3 4 PW T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 4 , 2 8 7 4 0 0 0 1 , 4 0 0 1 3 , 2 8 7 9 0 . 4 6 % 2 6 2 PW T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 21 , 7 6 0 4 0 0 0 1 , 1 7 7 2 0 , 9 8 3 9 4 . 6 8 % 2 , 9 1 9 PW T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 8, 6 0 4 1 7 5 0 8 4 8 7 , 9 3 2 9 0 . 3 4 % 1 , 0 5 0 PW A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 2 0 , 5 5 0 0 1 , 2 8 0 1 , 3 1 7 1 9 , 2 3 3 9 3 . 5 9 % 3 , 6 9 8 PW L e g a l N o t i c e s 45 0 0 0 1 7 2 2 7 8 6 1 . 8 6 % 0 PW P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 4, 3 2 5 6 0 0 9 3 4 , 2 9 3 9 7 . 8 9 % 2 3 1 PW I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 4 , 7 7 2 0 0 0 4 , 7 7 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 8 6 , 7 5 9 1 5 0 1 , 4 8 2 2 9 , 5 9 9 5 7 , 3 1 0 6 5 . 9 4 % 2 7 , 6 4 1 PW H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 67 5 1 5 5 1 1 5 1 1 1 7 9 2 5 . 8 9 % 6 6 0 PW P e n a l t i e s / S e t t l e m e n t s / F o r f e i t u r e s 0 60 , 0 0 0 35 0 59 , 3 0 2 69 8 1.16%0 PW T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 1, 4 7 8 , 1 6 7 (2 3 5 , 7 0 9 ) 24 , 3 7 7 19 2 , 4 9 1 1, 0 4 9 , 9 6 7 84.51%163,825 PW PW Ca p i t a l O u t l a y PW C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 28 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 0 0 0 51 0 (5 1 0 ) 0.00%0 PW T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 28 , 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 27 , 4 9 0 98.18%0 PW PW DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 5, 5 3 9 , 5 7 2 (1 4 6 , 9 4 9 ) 31 9 , 8 5 9 1, 0 8 3 , 7 3 6 4, 3 0 8 , 8 8 6 79.90%963,044 PW PW Tr a n s f e r s PW P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e - I N 1 1 7 , 3 6 7 0 9 , 1 1 5 2 7 , 0 1 1 9 0 , 3 5 6 7 6 . 9 8 % 1 8 , 9 2 2 PW O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T 1 7 , 6 1 0 (1 7 , 6 1 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 PW O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e - I N 9 5 , 9 4 3 17 , 6 1 0 3, 1 0 0 17 , 8 4 0 95 , 7 1 3 84.28%21,186 PW T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 23 0 , 9 2 0 0 12 , 2 1 5 44 , 8 5 2 18 6 , 0 6 8 80.58%40,108 PW PW TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 5, 7 7 0 , 4 9 1 (1 4 6 , 9 4 9 ) 33 2 , 0 7 4 1, 1 2 8 , 5 8 8 4, 4 9 4 , 9 5 5 79.93%1,003,152 49 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 5 2 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual MU B S 3 3 0 0 - M e r i d i a n U t i l i t y B i l l i n g MU B S RE V E N U E S MU B S D e p t S v c F e e s 30 , 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 6 0 0 2 9 , 4 0 0 9 8 . 0 0 % 4 8 0 MU B S G a r b a g e - A d m i n F e e R e v e n u e 7 4 9 , 9 6 1 0 14 3 , 9 9 1 14 3 , 9 9 1 60 5 , 9 7 0 80.80%63,390 MU B S T o t a l R E V E N U E S 77 9 , 9 6 1 0 14 4 , 1 1 1 14 4 , 5 9 1 63 5 , 3 7 0 81.46%63,870 MU B S MU B S PE R S O N N E L C O S T S MU B S W a g e s 34 5 , 6 1 8 0 2 8 , 9 5 1 8 4 , 5 3 9 2 6 1 , 0 7 9 7 5 . 5 3 % 7 8 , 2 3 9 MU B S O v e r t i m e W a g e s 3, 2 7 1 0 0 6 3 , 2 6 5 9 9 . 8 1 % 1 7 2 MU B S F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 26 , 6 9 0 0 2 , 0 9 1 6 , 1 0 2 2 0 , 5 8 8 7 7 . 1 3 % 5 , 6 5 1 MU B S P E R S I 41 , 6 5 8 0 3 , 2 7 7 9 , 5 7 1 3 2 , 0 8 7 7 7 . 0 2 % 8 , 4 7 8 MU B S W o r k e r s ' C o m p 87 2 0 0 0 8 7 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 1 2 1 , 5 8 4 0 2 3 0 1 , 0 6 0 1 2 0 , 5 2 4 9 9 . 1 2 % 1 8 , 4 7 4 MU B S M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 5 , 6 9 7 1 7 , 0 9 2 (1 7 , 0 9 2 ) 0.00% 0 MU B S V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 7 5 2 2 6 (2 2 6 ) 0.00% 0 MU B S D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 4 7 4 1 , 4 2 3 (1 , 4 2 3 ) 0.00% 0 MU B S L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 8 9 1 7 9 (1 7 9 ) 0.00% 0 MU B S S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 7 5 1 4 7 (1 4 7 ) 0.00% 0 MU B S L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 9 1 1 7 9 (1 7 9 ) 0.00% 0 MU B S E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 31 62 (6 2 ) 0.00%0 MU B S T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 53 9 , 6 9 3 0 41 , 0 8 2 12 0 , 5 8 6 41 9 , 1 0 7 77.66%111,014 MU B S MU B S OP E R A T I N G C O S T S MU B S O f f i c e E x p e n s e 6, 0 0 0 0 2 6 8 6 0 9 5 , 3 9 1 8 9 . 8 4 % 1 , 3 2 8 MU B S C o p i e r E x p e n s e 2, 4 0 0 0 4 3 6 1 , 3 2 9 1 , 0 7 1 4 4 . 6 0 % 1 6 4 MU B S E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 4 8 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S D a t a A c c e s s E x p e n s e 1, 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 8 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 3 0 , 5 9 0 0 0 3 0 , 6 2 8 (3 8 ) (0.12)% 30,598 MU B S M i s c C o n t r i b u t i o n s 13 , 0 0 0 0 5 2 1 2 , 2 4 7 1 0 , 7 5 3 8 2 . 7 1 % 1 , 4 5 6 MU B S E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 3 , 9 5 0 0 0 0 3 , 9 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 2 4 1 MU B S C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 2 , 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 6 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S L o c k b o x S e r v i c e s 22 , 6 0 0 0 0 3 , 2 0 7 1 9 , 3 9 3 8 5 . 8 1 % 5 , 1 6 0 MU B S I V R P h o n e S e r v i c e s 20 , 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 2 3 3 1 6 , 7 6 7 8 3 . 8 3 % 2 , 5 8 2 MU B S P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 26 0 , 0 0 0 0 8 , 1 5 6 4 9 , 8 2 4 2 1 0 , 1 7 7 8 0 . 8 3 % 6 1 , 6 0 3 MU B S B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 4 , 9 5 8 0 0 2 2 5 4 , 7 3 3 9 5 . 4 6 % 0 MU B S T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 , 1 2 5 0 0 6 4 9 4 7 6 4 2 . 2 9 % 0 MU B S T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 1, 1 2 5 0 0 1 , 2 0 2 (7 7 ) (6.81)% 0 MU B S T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 75 0 0 0 6 9 3 5 7 7 . 6 0 % 0 MU B S P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 13 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 , 3 0 5 MU B S I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 1 8 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 MU B S H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 12 0 0 9 3 9 3 2 7 2 2 . 3 2 % 1 1 7 MU B S B a n k & M e r c h a n t C h a r g e s 2 3 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 0 , 6 2 0 6 3 , 6 5 1 1 6 6 , 3 4 9 7 2 . 3 2 % 4 2 , 1 3 6 MU B S A / R W r i t e o f f s & L o s s 2 5 , 0 0 0 0 (1 3 2 ) 77 0 24 , 2 3 0 96.91%9,068 MU B S T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 64 0 , 3 2 8 0 29 , 9 6 2 15 8 , 3 6 0 48 1 , 9 6 8 75.27%159,758 MU B S MU B S Ca p i t a l O u t l a y 50 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 5 3 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual MU B S C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 14 , 7 2 8 (1 4 , 7 2 8 ) 0 3 , 9 6 0 (3 , 9 6 0 ) 0.00% 0 MU B S C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 7, 5 0 0 0 0 0 7, 5 0 0 100.00%0 MU B S T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 22 , 2 2 8 (1 4 , 7 2 8 ) 0 3, 9 6 0 3, 5 4 0 47.20%0 MU B S MU B S DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 2 0 2 , 2 4 9 (1 4 , 7 2 8 ) 71 , 0 4 4 28 2 , 9 0 6 90 4 , 6 1 5 76.17%270,773 MU B S MU B S TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 1, 2 0 2 , 2 4 9 (1 4 , 7 2 8 ) 71 , 0 4 4 28 2 , 9 0 6 90 4 , 6 1 5 76.17%270,773 51 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 5 4 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Wa t e r 3 4 0 0 - W a t e r D e p a r t m e n t Wa t e r RE V E N U E S Wa t e r D e p t S v c F e e s 25 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 0 , 6 9 0 7 4 , 8 8 1 1 7 5 , 1 1 9 7 0 . 0 4 % 7 8 , 0 6 9 Wa t e r R e c y c l e d R e v e n u e 0 0 1 , 6 1 1 1 , 6 1 1 (1 , 6 1 1 ) 0.00% 2,520 Wa t e r R e n t a l I n c o m e 20 , 0 0 0 0 2 , 9 5 5 2 3 , 9 5 1 (3 , 9 5 1 ) (19.75)% 21,691 Wa t e r W a t e r / S e w e r S a l e s R e v e n u e 8 , 8 5 2 , 8 0 4 0 5 5 1 , 9 6 7 1 , 9 5 6 , 8 6 5 6 , 8 9 5 , 9 3 9 7 7 . 8 9 % 1 , 8 2 3 , 7 8 2 Wa t e r M e t e r / E q u i p S a l e s R e v e n u e s 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 4 0 , 1 6 8 1 5 3 , 2 9 4 1 4 6 , 7 0 6 4 8 . 9 0 % 1 4 2 , 2 7 0 Wa t e r S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%6,093 Wa t e r T o t a l R E V E N U E S 9, 4 2 2 , 8 0 4 0 61 7 , 3 9 1 2, 2 1 0 , 6 0 3 7, 2 1 2 , 2 0 1 76.54%2,074,424 Wa t e r Wa t e r PE R S O N N E L C O S T S Wa t e r W a g e s 1, 3 1 5 , 2 7 6 5 8 , 7 8 7 1 0 6 , 3 4 4 3 1 1 , 8 9 8 1 , 0 6 2 , 1 6 5 7 7 . 3 0 % 2 8 7 , 3 9 7 Wa t e r O v e r t i m e W a g e s 34 , 5 8 6 5 0 0 3 , 2 7 8 8 , 8 0 5 2 6 , 2 8 1 7 4 . 9 0 % 7 , 1 8 9 Wa t e r F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 10 3 , 2 6 7 4 , 5 3 5 7 , 8 8 2 2 3 , 0 2 1 8 4 , 7 8 1 7 8 . 6 4 % 2 1 , 1 3 2 Wa t e r P E R S I 16 1 , 1 7 2 7 , 0 7 9 1 2 , 4 0 9 3 6 , 3 0 4 1 3 1 , 9 4 7 7 8 . 4 2 % 3 3 , 2 1 6 Wa t e r W o r k e r s ' C o m p 42 , 8 9 1 1 , 3 9 3 0 0 4 4 , 2 8 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % (1,254) Wa t e r E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 4 1 0 , 3 4 6 1 5 , 1 9 8 9 3 5 3 , 7 8 4 4 2 1 , 7 6 0 9 9 . 1 1 % 8 8 , 5 0 4 Wa t e r M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 8 , 0 0 8 8 4 , 0 2 3 (8 4 , 0 2 3 ) 0.00% 0 Wa t e r V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 3 4 1 1 , 0 2 4 (1 , 0 2 4 ) 0.00% 0 Wa t e r D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 , 2 1 6 6 , 6 4 8 (6 , 6 4 8 ) 0.00% 0 Wa t e r L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 9 1 5 8 2 (5 8 2 ) 0.00% 0 Wa t e r S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 7 4 5 3 7 (5 3 7 ) 0.00% 0 Wa t e r L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 3 6 6 5 9 (6 5 9 ) 0.00% 0 Wa t e r E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 10 1 20 2 (2 0 2 ) 0.00%0 Wa t e r T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 2, 0 6 7 , 5 3 8 87 , 4 9 2 16 2 , 4 1 4 47 7 , 4 8 7 1, 6 7 7 , 5 4 3 77.84%436,184 Wa t e r Wa t e r OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Wa t e r O f f i c e E x p e n s e 8, 0 0 0 0 1 2 7 1 , 0 3 9 6 , 9 6 1 8 7 . 0 0 % 1 , 3 6 2 Wa t e r C o p i e r E x p e n s e 3, 5 1 4 0 2 5 0 1 , 0 0 4 2 , 5 1 0 7 1 . 4 3 % 8 1 8 Wa t e r E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 1 , 6 2 0 6 0 3 3 4 7 8 1 8 9 9 5 3 . 5 2 % 2 9 6 Wa t e r C h e m i c a l s 11 0 , 0 0 0 0 7 , 0 6 1 2 6 , 9 8 0 8 3 , 0 2 0 7 5 . 4 7 % 2 0 , 4 9 7 Wa t e r J a n i t o r i a l 8, 7 0 0 0 0 3 5 8 8 , 3 4 2 9 5 . 8 8 % 1 , 0 7 4 Wa t e r S a f e t y E x p e n s e 13 , 2 7 4 6 5 0 7 2 0 4 , 8 9 0 9 , 0 3 4 6 4 . 8 8 % 2 , 7 9 7 Wa t e r S h o p S u p p l i e s 7, 0 0 0 0 2 6 4 9 7 4 6 , 0 2 6 8 6 . 0 8 % 6 2 9 Wa t e r F u e l s - G a s 48 , 6 0 0 0 3 , 1 6 4 1 0 , 6 3 0 3 7 , 9 7 0 7 8 . 1 2 % 5 , 8 4 6 Wa t e r F u e l s - D i e s e l / P r o p a n e 3 , 3 0 0 0 0 4 5 3 , 2 5 5 9 8 . 6 3 % 0 Wa t e r C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 5, 4 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 7 3 , 3 8 3 2 , 3 1 7 4 0 . 6 4 % 2 , 2 0 3 Wa t e r M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 30 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 1 4 Wa t e r W a t e r M e t e r s 81 2 , 8 3 9 0 0 1 , 8 7 4 8 1 0 , 9 6 5 9 9 . 7 6 % 1 4 3 , 4 1 3 Wa t e r B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 2 7 , 7 0 4 0 8 0 1 4 , 0 5 2 2 3 , 6 5 2 8 5 . 3 7 % 1 , 1 8 9 Wa t e r V e h i c l e R e p a i r 13 , 2 7 5 0 1 , 9 4 2 3 , 4 8 2 9 , 7 9 3 7 3 . 7 7 % 4 , 0 2 3 Wa t e r V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 13 , 7 7 5 0 6 2 2 3 , 1 9 7 1 0 , 5 7 8 7 6 . 7 8 % 5 6 1 Wa t e r E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 8 , 3 0 0 0 5 5 0 2 , 4 1 2 5 , 8 8 8 7 0 . 9 3 % 2 4 6 Wa t e r R o l l i n g S t o c k R e p a i r 2, 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r R o l l i n g S t o c k M a i n t e n a n c e 2 , 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 1 4 6 Wa t e r G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 3, 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 7 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 0 Wa t e r L i n e W a t / S e w M a i n t e n a n c e 2 2 , 4 6 8 0 7 2 3 , 2 3 3 1 9 , 2 3 5 8 5 . 6 1 % 4 , 4 1 3 Wa t e r L i n e W a t / S e w R e p a i r 1 8 3 , 5 0 0 0 9 , 7 8 2 2 9 , 8 9 7 1 5 3 , 6 0 3 8 3 . 7 0 % 2 7 , 3 9 5 Wa t e r S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 3 , 4 9 7 0 4 , 5 9 0 2 3 , 6 3 5 2 9 , 8 6 2 5 5 . 8 2 % 3 2 , 0 7 2 52 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 5 5 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Wa t e r A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 5 , 3 6 4 0 0 0 5 , 3 6 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 4 0 Wa t e r F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 8 1 , 0 0 0 2 1 , 0 0 0 3 , 4 5 9 1 7 , 6 3 2 8 4 , 3 6 8 8 2 . 7 1 % 3 3 , 2 3 1 Wa t e r W e l l M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 3 5 8 , 4 9 0 2 2 , 9 8 9 6 , 0 7 8 8 4 , 2 6 4 2 9 7 , 2 1 5 7 7 . 9 1 % 4 1 , 5 9 9 Wa t e r E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 3 4 , 8 2 7 9 6 . 5 4 % 1 5 6 Wa t e r F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 , 3 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 1 , 7 9 5 7 8 . 0 5 % 4 1 6 Wa t e r C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 8 , 2 0 0 2 , 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 , 4 1 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 6 3 Wa t e r P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 2 1 7 , 0 0 0 (8 , 6 8 0 ) 0 1 2 , 0 4 0 1 9 6 , 2 8 0 9 4 . 2 2 % 0 Wa t e r W a t e r T e s t i n g 19 4 , 5 6 7 0 5 , 5 0 8 1 4 , 4 9 1 1 8 0 , 0 7 6 9 2 . 5 5 % 9 , 0 8 6 Wa t e r D E Q W a t e r A s s e s s m e n t 1 0 7 , 9 8 8 0 0 1 0 5 , 5 2 2 2 , 4 6 6 2 . 2 8 % 1 0 1 , 2 1 4 Wa t e r C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 21 , 4 0 0 0 0 4 , 7 5 0 1 6 , 6 5 0 7 7 . 8 0 % 2 , 7 0 6 Wa t e r W e l l A s s e s s m e n t 50 , 0 0 0 (5 0 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 3, 7 4 4 0 3 4 4 1 , 0 3 2 2 , 7 1 2 7 2 . 4 2 % 1 , 0 3 0 Wa t e r P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 14 , 5 6 3 0 9 0 6 8 9 1 3 , 8 7 4 9 5 . 2 6 % 3 5 9 Wa t e r R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 1 7 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 2 9 5 4 , 2 3 3 1 2 , 7 6 7 7 5 . 0 9 % 3 , 0 2 4 Wa t e r C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 15 , 7 0 0 8 0 0 1 , 1 2 7 3 , 3 2 0 1 3 , 1 8 0 7 9 . 8 7 % 3 , 2 8 1 Wa t e r B u s i n e s s M e a l s 30 0 0 1 1 3 4 2 6 5 8 8 . 5 0 % 4 0 Wa t e r M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 1 7 , 5 4 2 2 , 0 0 0 2 5 1 , 9 3 7 1 7 , 6 0 5 9 0 . 0 8 % 2 , 6 0 2 Wa t e r T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 5 , 7 2 0 0 0 3 1 9 5 , 4 0 1 9 4 . 4 2 % 4 9 8 Wa t e r T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 5, 7 9 0 0 0 4 3 4 5 , 3 5 6 9 2 . 4 9 % 8 0 2 Wa t e r T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 3, 3 8 0 0 0 2 3 1 3 , 1 4 9 9 3 . 1 6 % 2 8 8 Wa t e r A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 9 , 5 5 5 0 9 0 9 0 9 , 4 6 5 9 9 . 0 5 % 0 Wa t e r P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 8, 7 9 1 0 0 9 3 8 , 6 9 8 9 8 . 9 4 % 2 4 0 Wa t e r I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 3 9 , 5 3 3 0 0 1 7 , 5 6 7 2 1 , 9 6 6 5 5 . 5 6 % 1 7 , 0 2 2 Wa t e r E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 4 3 1 , 2 2 8 0 2 5 , 6 1 7 8 7 , 1 2 5 3 4 4 , 1 0 3 7 9 . 7 9 % 8 9 , 6 9 5 Wa t e r I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 10 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 8 1 , 5 2 1 8 , 4 7 9 8 4 . 7 9 % 1 , 0 1 7 Wa t e r S a n i t a r y S e r v i c e s 1, 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 5 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 7 6 8 Wa t e r D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 1 0 , 0 9 3 3 3 4 1 2 0 2 4 2 1 0 , 1 8 5 9 7 . 6 7 % 1 , 0 9 3 Wa t e r I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 4, 5 0 0 0 0 3 , 3 5 4 1 , 1 4 6 2 5 . 4 6 % 3 , 2 7 4 Wa t e r H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 40 5 1 5 2 8 0 2 8 0 1 4 0 3 3 . 2 2 % 3 9 0 Wa t e r F i x e d A s s e t D i s p o s a l C o s t s 0 30 , 0 0 0 67 6 4, 2 6 3 25 , 7 3 7 85.78%0 Wa t e r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 3, 0 0 8 , 6 1 9 22 , 6 7 8 76 , 1 2 7 48 8 , 0 1 0 2, 5 4 3 , 2 8 7 83.90%565,665 Wa t e r Wa t e r Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Wa t e r C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 40 , 0 0 0 0 2 8 , 1 8 2 2 8 , 1 8 2 1 1 , 8 1 8 2 9 . 5 4 % 6 3 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - E l e c t r o n i c s 2 8 , 4 8 8 (2 8 , 4 8 8 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 , 7 0 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 93 , 5 7 0 (9 3 , 5 7 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 1 6 0 , 0 0 0 (2 0 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 14 0 , 0 0 0 100.00%0 Wa t e r T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 33 2 , 0 5 8 (1 4 2 , 0 5 8 ) 28 , 1 8 2 28 , 1 8 2 16 1 , 8 1 8 85.17%9,763 Wa t e r Wa t e r DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 5, 4 0 8 , 2 1 5 (3 1 , 8 8 8 ) 26 6 , 7 2 3 99 3 , 6 7 8 4, 3 8 2 , 6 4 8 81.51%1,011,612 Wa t e r Wa t e r Tr a n s f e r s Wa t e r P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T 3 8 , 0 8 7 (3 8 , 0 8 7 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 Wa t e r P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e - I N 9 5 9 , 4 0 5 3 8 , 0 8 7 8 0 , 1 8 0 2 3 2 , 0 9 7 7 6 5 , 3 9 5 7 6 . 7 3 % 2 1 8 , 4 7 2 Wa t e r O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T 1 0 5 , 6 1 3 (1 0 5 , 6 1 3 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 53 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 5 6 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Wa t e r O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e - I N 1 8 0 , 8 3 2 10 5 , 6 1 3 68 , 1 6 0 11 8 , 6 9 4 16 7 , 7 5 1 58.56%133,753 Wa t e r T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 1, 2 8 3 , 9 3 7 0 14 8 , 3 4 0 35 0 , 7 9 1 93 3 , 1 4 6 72.68%352,224 Wa t e r Wa t e r TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 6, 6 9 2 , 1 5 2 (3 1 , 8 8 8 ) 41 5 , 0 6 3 1, 3 4 4 , 4 6 9 5, 3 1 5 , 7 9 4 79.81%1,363,836 54 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 5 7 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual Wa t e r 3 4 9 0 - W a t e r C o n s t r u c t i o n Wa t e r RE V E N U E S Wa t e r A s s e s s m e n t s - R e s i d e n t i a l R e v e n u e 2 , 4 1 6 , 6 2 9 0 2 4 2 , 6 7 9 7 8 1 , 3 0 8 1 , 6 3 5 , 3 2 1 6 7 . 6 6 % 7 8 3 , 2 8 1 Wa t e r A s s e s s m e n t s - C o m m e r c i a l R e v e n u e 5 1 0 , 4 8 5 0 2 7 , 5 6 3 7 7 , 5 5 9 4 3 2 , 9 2 7 8 4 . 8 0 % 1 3 2 , 6 7 2 Wa t e r A s s e s s m e n t s - M u l t i f a m i l y R e v e n u e 4 2 6 , 4 6 4 0 3 4 5 , 2 7 5 6 0 2 , 3 8 3 (1 7 5 , 9 1 9 ) (41.25)% 457,736 Wa t e r I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 10 0 , 0 0 0 0 31 , 1 7 2 89 , 0 2 0 10 , 9 8 0 10.97%66,704 Wa t e r T o t a l R E V E N U E S 3, 4 5 3 , 5 7 8 0 64 6 , 6 8 9 1, 5 5 0 , 2 7 0 1, 9 0 3 , 3 0 8 55.11%1,440,394 Wa t e r Wa t e r OP E R A T I N G C O S T S Wa t e r I n v e s t m e n t S e r v i c e s 18 , 0 0 0 0 84 5 2, 5 2 7 15 , 4 7 3 85.96%2,513 Wa t e r T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 18 , 0 0 0 0 84 5 2, 5 2 7 15 , 4 7 3 85.96%2,513 Wa t e r Wa t e r Ca p i t a l O u t l a y Wa t e r C a p i t a l - E l e c t r o n i c s 3 6 4 , 2 7 8 (2 1 6 , 2 3 5 ) 9, 2 7 8 1 6 , 7 1 9 1 3 1 , 3 2 4 8 8 . 7 0 % 1 7 , 1 1 8 Wa t e r S e r v i c e L i n e / M a i n R e p l a c e m e n t 1 , 5 2 9 , 4 3 4 (3 7 6 , 2 4 0 ) 0 1 3 , 9 6 7 1 , 1 3 9 , 2 2 7 9 8 . 7 8 % 6 , 8 7 6 Wa t e r W E L L 1 5 25 3 , 7 7 6 (2 , 5 9 4 ) 8, 2 7 5 9 , 1 8 2 2 4 2 , 0 0 0 9 6 . 3 4 % 7 , 7 5 5 Wa t e r W E L L 2 9 c o n s t r u c t i o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 4 8 4 , 2 2 6 Wa t e r W E L L 2 2 C o n s t r u c t i o n 1 , 3 4 1 , 6 1 6 (7 9 3 , 2 8 1 ) 0 3 0 5 , 4 3 3 2 4 2 , 9 0 2 4 4 . 2 9 % 7 6 , 4 4 1 Wa t e r W E L L 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 2 9 , 7 3 5 Wa t e r W A T E R L I N E E X T E N S I O N S 2 , 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 (1 2 4 , 0 3 6 ) 10 5 2 4 , 9 9 8 2 , 0 5 0 , 9 6 6 9 8 . 7 9 % 3 5 2 , 0 0 8 Wa t e r W e l l 2 8 c o n s t r u c t i o n 1 , 5 9 1 , 9 7 8 (3 6 , 9 2 5 ) 0 3 9 , 2 7 8 1 , 5 1 5 , 7 7 5 9 7 . 4 7 % 5 4 , 3 4 9 Wa t e r W e l l 3 2 c a p i t a l 80 5 , 5 6 3 (2 8 9 , 6 9 7 ) 4, 4 6 1 2 8 0 , 9 9 4 2 3 4 , 8 7 2 4 5 . 5 2 % 2 3 , 5 0 3 Wa t e r W E L L 3 3 84 5 , 4 7 3 (3 5 0 , 0 2 8 ) 25 0 19 , 1 8 9 47 6 , 2 5 6 96.12%0 Wa t e r T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 8, 9 3 2 , 1 1 8 (2 , 1 8 9 , 0 3 6 ) 22 , 3 6 9 70 9 , 7 6 0 6, 0 3 3 , 3 2 2 89.47%1,352,010 Wa t e r Wa t e r DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 8, 9 5 0 , 1 1 8 (2 , 1 8 9 , 0 3 6 ) 23 , 2 1 4 71 2 , 2 8 7 6, 0 4 8 , 7 9 5 89.46%1,354,522 Wa t e r Wa t e r TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 8, 9 5 0 , 1 1 8 (2 , 1 8 9 , 0 3 6 ) 23 , 2 1 4 71 2 , 2 8 7 6, 0 4 8 , 7 9 5 89.46%1,354,522 55 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 5 8 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW T P 3 5 0 0 - W a s t e W a t e r F a c i l i t y WW T P RE V E N U E S WW T P R e v i e w F e e s 0 0 9 7 5 4 , 2 7 5 (4 , 2 7 5 ) 0.00% 4,350 WW T P R e i m b u r s e m e n t R e v e n u e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 9 WW T P R e c y c l e d R e v e n u e 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 5 2 WW T P W a t e r / S e w e r S a l e s R e v e n u e 1 5 , 9 4 5 , 3 9 6 0 1 , 3 4 3 , 2 9 4 3 , 8 2 9 , 9 2 4 1 2 , 1 1 5 , 4 7 2 7 5 . 9 8 % 3 , 7 2 2 , 8 9 3 WW T P S a l e o f A s s e t s - G a i n ( L o s s ) 0 0 56 0 56 0 (5 6 0 ) 0.00%0 WW T P T o t a l R E V E N U E S 15 , 9 4 5 , 3 9 6 0 1, 3 4 4 , 8 2 9 3, 8 3 4 , 7 5 9 12 , 1 1 0 , 6 3 7 75.95%3,727,404 WW T P WW T P PE R S O N N E L C O S T S WW T P W a g e s 2, 0 2 3 , 0 3 9 (5 8 , 7 8 7 ) 15 5 , 7 4 3 4 4 6 , 4 4 0 1 , 5 1 7 , 8 1 1 7 7 . 2 7 % 4 1 2 , 5 1 9 WW T P O v e r t i m e W a g e s 49 , 8 5 5 (5 0 0 ) 3, 4 5 8 1 4 , 3 3 6 3 5 , 0 1 9 7 0 . 9 5 % 1 0 , 8 6 8 WW T P F I C A ( 7 . 6 5 % ) 15 8 , 5 7 7 (4 , 5 3 5 ) 11 , 5 8 4 3 3 , 5 0 8 1 2 0 , 5 3 4 7 8 . 2 4 % 3 0 , 7 1 0 WW T P P E R S I 24 6 , 6 2 1 (7 , 0 7 9 ) 18 , 0 2 2 5 2 , 0 9 6 1 8 7 , 4 4 6 7 8 . 2 5 % 4 7 , 6 8 9 WW T P W o r k e r s ' C o m p 50 , 9 7 8 (1 , 3 9 3 ) 0 0 4 9 , 5 8 5 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P E m p l o y e e B e n e f i t F e e s 6 2 3 , 1 1 8 (1 5 , 1 9 8 ) 1, 0 5 0 5 , 0 9 1 6 0 2 , 8 2 9 9 9 . 1 6 % 1 0 9 , 8 0 5 WW T P M e d i c a l I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 5 , 7 0 2 1 0 5 , 0 1 1 (1 0 5 , 0 1 1 ) 0.00% 0 WW T P H S A / H R A V E B A C o n t r i b u t i o n s 0 0 1 6 7 6 6 7 (6 6 7 ) 0.00% 0 WW T P V i s i o n I n s P r e m i u m 0 0 4 3 5 1 , 2 6 5 (1 , 2 6 5 ) 0.00% 0 WW T P D e n t a l I n s P r e m i u m s 0 0 2 , 8 3 6 8 , 2 9 9 (8 , 2 9 9 ) 0.00% 0 WW T P L i f e I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m s 0 0 4 1 5 8 1 8 (8 1 8 ) 0.00% 0 WW T P S h o r t T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 3 9 8 7 7 0 (7 7 0 ) 0.00% 0 WW T P L o n g T e r m D i s a b i l i t y P r e m i u m s 0 0 4 8 4 9 3 6 (9 3 6 ) 0.00% 0 WW T P E A P P r e m i u m s 0 0 14 4 28 8 (2 8 8 ) 0.00%0 WW T P T o t a l P E R S O N N E L C O S T S 3, 1 5 2 , 1 8 8 (8 7 , 4 9 2 ) 23 0 , 4 3 7 66 9 , 5 2 5 2, 3 9 5 , 1 7 1 78.15%611,591 WW T P WW T P OP E R A T I N G C O S T S WW T P O f f i c e E x p e n s e 6, 6 5 0 0 9 7 5 4 4 6 , 1 0 6 9 1 . 8 2 % 1 , 1 1 5 WW T P C o p i e r E x p e n s e 4, 9 6 6 0 4 9 5 1 , 1 7 0 3 , 7 9 6 7 6 . 4 4 % 2 , 7 4 3 WW T P E m p l o y e e R e c o g n i t i o n a n d C o f f e e 2 , 4 6 0 (6 0 ) 48 7 7 5 1 1 , 6 4 9 6 8 . 6 9 % 4 4 7 WW T P C h e m i c a l s 45 0 , 0 0 0 0 8 , 2 0 9 9 2 , 0 2 8 3 5 7 , 9 7 2 7 9 . 5 4 % 8 2 , 8 8 9 WW T P J a n i t o r i a l 22 , 3 0 0 0 6 7 3 , 3 0 0 1 9 , 0 0 0 8 5 . 2 0 % 4 , 5 9 5 WW T P S a f e t y E x p e n s e 32 , 4 5 0 (6 5 0 ) 97 3 1 1 , 8 2 7 1 9 , 9 7 3 6 2 . 8 0 % 5 , 1 0 8 WW T P S h o p S u p p l i e s 69 , 0 0 0 0 5 , 1 3 3 1 2 , 3 1 6 5 6 , 6 8 4 8 2 . 1 5 % 1 0 , 8 9 1 WW T P F u e l s - G a s 17 , 8 0 0 0 1 , 3 2 9 7 , 0 8 2 1 0 , 7 1 8 6 0 . 2 1 % 3 , 2 1 3 WW T P F u e l s - D i e s e l / P r o p a n e 9 , 0 0 0 0 9 1 9 1 8 , 9 0 9 9 8 . 9 8 % 3 , 3 1 1 WW T P C l o t h i n g E x p e n s e 6, 6 0 0 (3 0 0 ) 1, 3 6 3 1 , 6 5 7 4 , 6 4 3 7 3 . 7 0 % 2 , 9 5 4 WW T P M e d i c a l S u p p l i e s 85 0 0 0 1 2 8 3 8 9 8 . 6 0 % 2 6 1 WW T P C o m m u n i t y E v e n t s E x p e n s e s 1 , 5 0 0 0 0 1 8 1 , 4 8 2 9 8 . 7 7 % 0 WW T P B u i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e 6 2 , 0 0 0 0 2 1 7 1 6 , 1 4 8 4 5 , 8 5 3 7 3 . 9 5 % 1 3 , 2 8 2 WW T P P l a n t M a i n t e n a n c e 54 0 , 0 0 0 0 2 4 , 1 3 1 1 1 7 , 5 2 5 4 2 2 , 4 7 5 7 8 . 2 3 % 2 5 , 4 0 1 WW T P P l a n t R e p a i r s 15 5 , 0 0 0 0 3 , 8 7 4 2 1 , 5 2 3 1 3 3 , 4 7 7 8 6 . 1 1 % 2 2 , 8 0 7 WW T P P a r k i n g / A s p h a l t M a i n t e n a n c e 6 , 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 9 0 0 1 0 0 1 . 6 6 % 0 WW T P V e h i c l e R e p a i r 29 , 6 0 0 0 2 3 0 2 , 7 5 8 2 6 , 8 4 1 9 0 . 6 8 % 9 , 4 5 2 WW T P V e h i c l e M a i n t e n a n c e 24 , 4 0 0 0 4 6 4 1 , 1 0 7 2 3 , 2 9 3 9 5 . 4 6 % 1 , 9 2 8 WW T P E q u i p m e n t M a i n t e n a n c e & R e p a i r 6 5 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 8 6 2 4 2 , 0 3 8 2 2 , 9 6 2 3 5 . 3 2 % 4 2 , 3 2 2 WW T P R o l l i n g S t o c k R e p a i r 1 0 , 0 0 0 0 9 , 4 1 6 9 , 8 3 9 1 6 0 1 . 6 0 % 2 5 1 WW T P R o l l i n g S t o c k M a i n t e n a n c e 8 , 5 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 2 0 7 , 4 8 0 8 7 . 9 9 % 1 , 2 6 1 WW T P G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e 15 , 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 2 3 2 1 3 , 7 6 8 9 1 . 7 8 % 9 4 5 56 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 5 9 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW T P L i f t S t a t i o n M a i n t 45 , 0 0 0 0 3 , 0 7 4 4 , 5 3 8 4 0 , 4 6 2 8 9 . 9 1 % 6 , 2 6 7 WW T P L i f t S t a t i o n R e p a i r 35 , 0 0 0 0 8 , 0 5 8 2 3 , 1 7 9 1 1 , 8 2 1 3 3 . 7 7 % 1 3 6 WW T P L i n e W a t / S e w M a i n t e n a n c e 2 7 , 3 2 0 0 0 5 , 6 5 5 2 1 , 6 6 5 7 9 . 3 0 % 1 , 7 7 7 WW T P L i n e W a t / S e w R e p a i r 2 2 5 , 0 0 0 (6 0 , 0 0 0 ) 35 , 7 0 0 3 9 , 9 2 5 1 2 5 , 0 7 5 7 5 . 8 0 % 1 6 , 4 1 2 WW T P S o f t w a r e M a i n t e n a n c e 5 8 , 1 3 9 0 1 7 , 1 3 7 4 8 , 1 0 2 1 0 , 0 3 7 1 7 . 2 6 % 2 9 , 9 2 2 WW T P A l a r m S e r v i c e / S p r i n k l e r S y s t e m 3 , 2 2 7 0 0 0 3 , 2 2 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 8 3 WW T P F l a g / B a n n e r E x p e n s e 20 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P E q u i p m e n t & S u p p l i e s 1 6 1 , 5 0 0 (1 , 0 0 0 ) 82 4 2 , 4 9 7 1 5 8 , 0 0 3 9 8 . 4 4 % 1 3 , 5 9 5 WW T P E l e c t r o n i c s E x p e n s e ( u n d e r $ 5 0 0 0 ) 7 , 7 3 0 0 0 4 6 5 7 , 2 6 5 9 3 . 9 8 % 2 0 1 WW T P S o f t w a r e A c q u i s i t i o n & L i c e n s e s ( u n d e r $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) 30 , 0 0 0 (3 0 , 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P F u r n i t u r e & F u r n i s h i n g s 1 , 5 0 0 (1 , 0 0 0 ) 67 6 6 1 (1 6 1 ) (32.23)% 0 WW T P C o m p u t e r s & P r i n t e r s ( I T u s e o n l y ) 1 6 , 7 1 0 (2 , 2 1 0 ) 0 0 1 4 , 5 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s 1 4 5 , 0 0 0 (4 1 , 0 0 0 ) 29 2 2 9 2 1 0 3 , 7 0 8 9 9 . 7 1 % 1 , 0 5 5 WW T P C o n t r a c t e d L a b o r 5, 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P P r e v e n t a t i v e H e a l t h E x p 1 , 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 , 0 6 0 8 8 . 3 3 % 0 WW T P D E Q W a t e r A s s e s s m e n t 5 9 , 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 9 , 0 0 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P C o n t r a c t e d S e r v i c e s 79 , 5 0 0 0 6 , 9 5 1 1 6 , 5 5 5 6 2 , 9 4 5 7 9 . 1 7 % 7 , 7 4 8 WW T P T e l e p h o n e / I n t e r n e t 5, 5 0 0 0 5 4 7 1 , 1 6 6 4 , 3 3 4 7 8 . 8 0 % 1 , 1 6 4 WW T P P o s t a g e & M a i l i n g s 11 , 5 0 0 0 1 , 3 9 6 1 , 8 1 1 9 , 6 8 9 8 4 . 2 5 % 2 , 9 1 7 WW T P R a d i o s / C o m m u n i c a t i o n s 2 , 5 8 0 0 1 9 1 5 6 5 2 , 0 1 5 7 8 . 0 9 % 4 5 5 WW T P C e l l p h o n e E x p e n s e 14 , 3 2 0 (8 0 0 ) 98 3 2 , 9 7 0 1 0 , 5 5 0 7 8 . 0 2 % 2 , 4 4 9 WW T P B u s i n e s s M e a l s 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 8 8 WW T P M i l e a g e & P a r k i n g R e i m b u r s e m e n t 0 0 0 2 2 8 (2 2 8 ) 0.00% 0 WW T P E m p l o y e e S e m i n a r s / T r a i n i n g 3 9 , 1 2 7 (2 , 0 0 0 ) 60 1 1 1 , 1 3 9 2 5 , 9 8 7 6 9 . 9 9 % 6 , 7 9 9 WW T P T r a v e l - T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 7 , 4 5 0 0 0 1 3 6 7 , 3 1 5 9 8 . 1 8 % 9 3 2 WW T P T r a v e l - L o d g i n g 8, 6 2 5 0 0 3 0 7 8 , 3 1 8 9 6 . 4 4 % 2 , 2 0 5 WW T P T r a v e l - P e r D i e m 2, 8 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 2 , 6 6 0 9 4 . 9 9 % 6 4 9 WW T P A d v e r t i s i n g / P r o m o t i o n a l 5 , 3 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 6 0 4 , 2 4 0 8 0 . 0 0 % 1 , 5 0 8 WW T P L e g a l N o t i c e s 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 1 5 WW T P P r i n t i n g / B i n d i n g 1, 2 5 0 0 4 6 4 6 1 , 2 0 4 9 6 . 3 0 % 4 6 WW T P I n s u r a n c e P r e m i u m / C l a i m s 5 0 , 3 1 5 0 0 2 2 , 3 5 8 2 7 , 9 5 7 5 5 . 5 6 % 2 1 , 5 4 0 WW T P E l e c t r i c i t y - I d a h o P o w e r 5 0 8 , 8 1 3 0 3 , 3 5 6 8 4 , 9 6 8 4 2 3 , 8 4 5 8 3 . 3 0 % 1 4 5 , 9 3 8 WW T P I n t e r m o u n t a i n G a s 87 , 5 0 0 0 7 , 0 1 9 1 3 , 2 8 2 7 4 , 2 1 8 8 4 . 8 2 % 1 3 , 8 1 1 WW T P S a n i t a r y S e r v i c e s 20 0 , 9 0 0 0 1 , 3 3 6 2 8 , 4 7 4 1 7 2 , 4 2 6 8 5 . 8 2 % 2 2 , 9 0 2 WW T P E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l & L e a s e 1 0 , 7 4 6 0 6 1 5 2 0 1 0 , 2 2 6 9 5 . 1 5 % 1 8 2 WW T P D u e s , L i c e n s e s , P u b l i c a t i o n s 6 , 6 7 8 (3 3 4 ) 12 0 5 9 0 5 , 7 5 4 9 0 . 6 9 % 5 6 8 WW T P I r r i g a t i o n T a x e s 4, 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 5 2 1 4 7 9 1 1 . 9 7 % 3 , 5 6 0 WW T P H o l i d a y E x p e n s e 61 5 (1 5 ) 41 6 41 6 18 5 30.75%585 WW T P T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 3, 4 0 8 , 2 2 4 (1 3 9 , 3 6 9 ) 14 6 , 6 1 1 66 5 , 5 9 2 2, 6 0 3 , 2 6 2 79.64%540,887 WW T P WW T P Ca p i t a l O u t l a y WW T P C a p i t a l - V e h i c l e s 40 , 0 0 0 0 0 6 , 7 0 6 3 3 , 2 9 4 8 3 . 2 3 % 0 WW T P C a p i t a l - E l e c t r o n i c s 1 2 , 3 3 1 (1 2 , 3 3 1 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 2 , 7 0 0 WW T P C a p i t a l - S o f t w a r e 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 7, 5 0 0 0 8, 9 1 9 8, 9 1 9 (1 , 4 1 9 ) (18.92)%9,346 WW T P T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 59 , 8 3 1 17 , 6 6 9 8, 9 1 9 15 , 6 2 5 61 , 8 7 5 79.84%22,046 WW T P WW T P DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 6, 6 2 0 , 2 4 3 (2 0 9 , 1 9 2 ) 38 5 , 9 6 6 1, 3 5 0 , 7 4 3 5, 0 6 0 , 3 0 8 78.93%1,174,524 WW T P 57 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 6 0 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW T P Tr a n s f e r s WW T P P e r s o n n e l t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T 3 8 , 0 8 7 (3 8 , 0 8 7 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P P e r s o n n e l T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e - I N 9 5 9 , 4 0 5 3 8 , 0 8 7 8 1 , 5 2 0 2 3 6 , 1 1 6 7 6 1 , 3 7 6 7 6 . 3 2 % 2 2 2 , 7 2 7 WW T P O p e r a t i n g t r a n s f e r i n t e r f u n d - O U T 1 0 5 , 6 1 3 (1 0 5 , 6 1 3 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P O p e r a t i n g T r a n s f e r o f E x p e n s e - I N 1 8 0 , 8 3 2 10 5 , 6 1 3 68 , 1 6 0 11 8 , 6 9 4 16 7 , 7 5 1 58.56%133,753 WW T P T o t a l T r a n s f e r s 1, 2 8 3 , 9 3 7 0 14 9 , 6 7 9 35 4 , 8 1 0 92 9 , 1 2 7 72.37%356,480 WW T P WW T P TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 7, 9 0 4 , 1 8 0 (2 0 9 , 1 9 2 ) 53 5 , 6 4 5 1, 7 0 5 , 5 5 3 5, 9 8 9 , 4 3 5 77.83%1,531,004 58 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 6 1 o f 7 3 6 Ci t y o f M e r i d i a n St a t e m e n t o f R e v e n u e s E x p e n s e s Fr o m 1 2 / 1 / 1 8 - 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 8 De p t De s c r i p t i o n To t a l B u d g e t - Or i g i n a l To t a l B u d g e t - Re v i s e d Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Ac t u a l Cu r r e n t Y e a r Ac t u a l Bu d g e t Re m a i n i n g Percent of Budget RemainingPrior Year Actual WW T P 3 5 9 0 - W a s t e W a t e r C o n s t r u c t i o n WW T P RE V E N U E S WW T P A s s e s s m e n t s - R e s i d e n t i a l R e v e n u e 4 , 7 5 7 , 3 1 7 0 5 1 6 , 5 7 2 1 , 6 4 6 , 8 1 6 3 , 1 1 0 , 5 0 1 6 5 . 3 8 % 1 , 5 3 8 , 4 7 2 WW T P E P A W W C o m p l i a n c e F e e 1 , 5 7 6 , 5 1 5 0 1 3 2 , 1 7 3 3 9 5 , 1 2 6 1 , 1 8 1 , 3 8 9 7 4 . 9 3 % 3 7 4 , 0 6 1 WW T P A s s e s s m e n t s - C o m m e r c i a l R e v e n u e 9 5 8 , 1 2 1 0 6 7 , 7 3 7 2 9 9 , 1 0 7 6 5 9 , 0 1 4 6 8 . 7 8 % 2 9 9 , 0 5 8 WW T P A s s e s s m e n t s - M u l t i f a m i l y R e v e n u e 8 3 9 , 5 2 8 0 6 7 9 , 7 0 0 1 , 1 9 2 , 3 8 8 (3 5 2 , 8 6 0 ) (42.03)% 901,088 WW T P I n t e r e s t E a r n i n g s 50 , 0 0 0 0 58 , 4 6 3 17 4 , 2 2 1 (1 2 4 , 2 2 1 ) (248.44)%130,316 WW T P T o t a l R E V E N U E S 8, 1 8 1 , 4 8 1 0 1, 4 5 4 , 6 4 5 3, 7 0 7 , 6 5 7 4, 4 7 3 , 8 2 4 54.68%3,242,995 WW T P WW T P OP E R A T I N G C O S T S WW T P I n v e s t m e n t S e r v i c e s 35 , 0 0 0 0 1, 6 8 9 5, 0 5 4 29 , 9 4 6 85.55%5,025 WW T P T o t a l O P E R A T I N G C O S T S 35 , 0 0 0 0 1, 6 8 9 5, 0 5 4 29 , 9 4 6 85.56%5,025 WW T P WW T P Ca p i t a l O u t l a y WW T P C a p i t a l O u t l a y - L a n d 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 0 WW T P W W T P - B l d g i m p r o v e m e n t s 8 7 6 , 5 8 4 (5 0 , 9 6 5 ) 0 4 2 3 , 9 0 2 4 0 1 , 7 1 7 4 8 . 6 5 % 5 3 , 2 3 5 WW T P S e w e r L i n e E x t e n s i o n s 4 , 4 6 0 , 8 6 0 (1 , 8 1 5 , 1 3 0 ) 0 6 3 , 6 9 6 2 , 5 8 2 , 0 3 4 9 7 . 5 9 % 1 3 , 2 3 2 WW T P C a p i t a l - E q u i p m e n t 67 , 8 8 8 (6 7 , 8 8 8 ) 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 5 0 0 WW T P S e r v i c e L i n e / M a i n R e p l a c e m e n t 2 , 2 9 0 , 2 9 1 (4 5 9 , 0 7 8 ) 0 2 2 , 3 9 0 1 , 8 0 8 , 8 2 3 9 8 . 7 7 % 1 6 , 6 4 9 WW T P P r e D e s i g n o f C a p i t a l P r o j e c t s 1 9 , 7 2 7 , 2 0 8 (4 , 8 1 3 , 1 0 8 ) 44 3 , 8 2 0 1 , 7 3 6 , 2 8 9 1 3 , 1 7 7 , 8 1 2 8 8 . 3 5 % 4 , 0 5 5 , 5 2 8 WW T P B o i s e R i v e r O u t f a l l 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 % 1 9 4 , 4 5 7 WW T P C e n t r a t e B a s i n C o n s t r u c t i o n 7 5 , 8 4 6 (6 , 6 4 7 ) 4, 4 3 6 1 4 , 8 4 6 5 4 , 3 5 3 7 8 . 5 4 % 4 7 0 WW T P H e a d w o r k s I m p r o v e m e n t s 6 , 3 3 3 , 2 8 7 (2 , 6 7 1 , 9 4 7 ) 7, 1 0 7 78 6 , 2 0 7 2, 8 7 5 , 1 3 3 78.52%590,849 WW T P T o t a l C a p i t a l O u t l a y 34 , 6 3 1 , 9 6 4 (9 , 8 8 4 , 7 6 2 ) 45 5 , 3 6 3 3, 0 4 7 , 3 3 0 21 , 6 9 9 , 8 7 2 87.69%4,924,919 WW T P WW T P DE P T E X P E N D I T U R E S 34 , 6 6 6 , 9 6 4 (9 , 8 8 4 , 7 6 2 ) 45 7 , 0 5 3 3, 0 5 2 , 3 8 4 21 , 7 2 9 , 8 1 8 87.68%4,929,944 WW T P WW T P TO T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S 34 , 6 6 6 , 9 6 4 (9 , 8 8 4 , 7 6 2 ) 45 7 , 0 5 3 3, 0 5 2 , 3 8 4 21 , 7 2 9 , 8 1 8 87.68%4,929,944 59 o f 5 9 Me r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 5 6 2 o f 7 3 6 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 Y Project File Number: Item Title: AP Invoices for Payment 1/30/19- $521,385.57 Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.Y. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - AP Invoices for P ayment 1/30/19- $521,385.57 C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate I nvoices for Payment Cover Memo 1/24/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/24/2019 - 1:07 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 563 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund ACE AUTO BODY Body Work to Repair Scratch Right Rear Bumper Unit# 15 1,103.85 01 General Fund ACE AUTO BODY Repair Damage tp Front End from DR# 18-8828 Unit# 104 2,949.62 01 General Fund AMERICAN DOOR SERVICE/MERIDIAN DOOR & HARDWARE Door stop and adjust latchs 90.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 00790B, as of 1/9/19 102.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 28628C, as of 1/8/2019 241.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 28629C, as of 1/8/19 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 29188C, as of 12/11/18 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 29311C, as of 1/8/19 561.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 29483C, as of 1/8/19 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 30070C, as of 1/8/19 293.50 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 30145C, as of 1/9/19 236.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 40233C, as of 1/8/19 280.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 40358C, as of 1/9/19 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 40359C, as of 1/9/19 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 40542C, as of 12/19/18 40.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 40660C, as of 1/9/19 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 40663C, as of 12/19/18 577.46 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 40670C, as of 1/9/19 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 40672C, as of 1/9/19 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 40746C, as of 1/9/19 54.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 40747C, as of 1/9/19 54.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 40748C, as of 1/9/19 54.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 40826C, as of 1/8/2019 94.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 41297C, as of 1/9/19 54.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 51547C, as of 1/9/19 238.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 51753C, as of 1/9/19 196.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint. 65d, as of 12/19/18 65.00 01 General Fund BERRY ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.19-0027 FY19 Streetlight Maint.40666C, as of 12/19/18 94.00 01 General Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 19-007 FY19 01/21 Statement & Delinquent Notce Processing 127.74 01 General Fund BRIGHT IDEAS LIGHTING COMPANY emergency light repairs at Generations Plaza-tree lighting 144.00 Date: 1/24/19 12:38:10 PM Page: 1Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 564 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund BRIGHT IDEAS LIGHTING COMPANY GFCI/2 gang outlet repair at tree wells at City Hall 99.00 01 General Fund BROWNELLS Firearms Equipment 84.99 01 General Fund BSN SPORTS, INC.floor tape & balls - qty 10 98.87 01 General Fund CABLE ONE #112461900 City Hall Cable Service 1/16/19-2/15/19 42.00 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY 220/Rebuild work boots, Tim Kelley 279.69 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY Dog Food and Collar for K9 Acro 98.07 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY Dog Food for Dory 43.19 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY flagpole clips & bolts for Fuller Park - qty 8 16.72 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. CREDIT from ERS for Inspector Vech #6 double charge (319.00) 01 General Fund ERS, EMERGENCY RESPONDER SERVICES, INC. New Push Bumper for Unit #104, Damage to Front End 369.00 01 General Fund EVERBRIDGE INC Nixle Engage, Setup Fee 7,560.00 01 General Fund FEDEX Background Out of State applicant Aaron Darby 26.20 01 General Fund G.W. LAW ENFORCEMENT & SAFETY EQUIPMENT, INC Glock Springs qty 67 268.00 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER & SUPPLY CO 19-0117, 8 cs. soap 271.44 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 220/credit for tax charged on Inv # 5581056 (1.50) 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 220/Staples, ST. 1 shop supplies 26.48 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Jigsaw blades 10.97 01 General Fund IDAHO CHILD SUPPORT RECEIPTING B.Caldwell Case#251042 Child Support Increase for January 19 118.00 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER #220773816 City Hall Power January 2019 6,416.73 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER 2205054725 Police Power January 2019 3,427.86 01 General Fund IDAHO STATESMAN Job postings Solid Waste Coor; Admin Assist.and Job Pack 4,080.00 01 General Fund IDAHO TOOL & EQUIPMENT pliers, wrench set, drill, socket set, screwdrivers qty 30 1,415.49 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL Code books for Mechanical Inspectors 1,411.02 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL Code Books; Mechanical Inspectors 264.30 01 General Fund INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL Tabs for Code Book, Plan Review 38.40 01 General Fund JAMIE BEEHN Per Diem: J. Beehn, Microsoft Exchange Training, Arlington V 418.00 01 General Fund KATHY DRURY-BOGLE, PHR PO19-0153 Training and Development Dec 2018 2,000.00 01 General Fund KATHY DRURY-BOGLE, PHR PO19-0153 Training and Development Nov 2018 2,000.00 01 General Fund MIKE BARTON Reimburse: M. Barton, INLA Conference, Boise ID, 1/16-1/18/1 39.00 01 General Fund MODERN PRINTERS Newsletters cut and folded 30,000 385.00 01 General Fund NESMITH BROTHERS TOWING Evidence Tow, DR 18-8802 75.00 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Binders, Paper, Clock, Envelopes and Staples for PD 437.44 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Dishwand for PD 4.36 Date: 1/24/19 12:38:10 PM Page: 2Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 565 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Packing Tape Returned, Wrong Size (33.94) 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Report Jackets for PD 77.98 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Standing desk for ADA Accommodation - Com Dev 320.00 01 General Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Toner Cartridge for PD 51.97 01 General Fund OXARC, INC.220/refill 3 cylindars, medical oxygen 20.20 01 General Fund RED WING SHOES Safety boots Electrical Inspector, D. Ward 178.49 01 General Fund RMT EQUIPMENT credit on actuator for Ventrac 1 broom arm - qty 1 (283.05) 01 General Fund RMT EQUIPMENT Kioti tractor wiper mower - qty 1 256.90 01 General Fund SHRED-IT USA, LLC.Shred it Dec 2018 73.75 01 General Fund SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY liquid ice melt - qty 2,008 gallons 2,248.96 01 General Fund SPOKANE PACKAGING FIREARMS TARGETS 3,543.90 01 General Fund ST. LUKE'S HEALTH SOLUTIONS Wellness Day Cooking Demo Nov 2018 350.00 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 2019 Planner, business card holder R. Beierle 21.62 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Award Plaques for 2019 picnic qty 5 71.40 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Blank Badge Cards 100 and Pens 1 bx for HR 26.98 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Boot covers for Inspectors 26.49 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Business card holder, K. Hibbard 8.49 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Calculator for CRitchie 6.89 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Hard Hats Mechanical Inspectors 104.40 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Navigator Premium Paper 60.76 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Oily waste can for facilities 48.76 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Pedaflex File Folders (200)19.74 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON pelican case for pressure logger - qty 1 144.95 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Rankie DisplayPort to HDMI Cable, 4k Resolution Ready, 15ft, 25.98 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Safety Vests for Mechanical Inspectors 288.00 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Sandra R. Surface Case & Mouse 30.98 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Weight Scale for Wellness Works program 185.00 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE Ground Commercial Tracking# 1ZE786060300519257 16.10 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE Postage to Send BWC back for Replacement 32.88 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE Postage to Send Evidence to Lab 46.56 01 General Fund TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES HVAC Winter maintenance filter change 325.00 01 General Fund TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES HVAC Winter maintenance, test system, performed analysis 2,738.00 01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001 Life Insurance premiums 14,689.48 01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE Group #2065A United Heritage vol life ins January 2019 4,665.61 01 General Fund WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO Troubleshoot alarms at City Hall 254.93 01 General Fund WIENHOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC PO19-0166 Drug/Alcohol Testing for Dec. 2018 300.00 Date: 1/24/19 12:38:10 PM Page: 3Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 566 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount Total 01 General Fund 71,054.05 07 Impact Fund FASTENAL COMPANY hardware for Discovery Park water log - qty 44 279.50 07 Impact Fund RAFTELIS 18-0454, FY18 Impact Fee Update, 12/1/18-12/31/18 7,162.50 07 Impact Fund RICE FERGUS MILLER INC 18-0501 220/2nd Phase St. 6 41,137.93 Total 07 Impact Fund 48,579.93 60 Enterprise Fund ADAM JENNINGS Expense Report A.Jennings WEF Forum AustinTX 1/13/19-1/16/19 54.72 60 Enterprise Fund ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC.19-0082 Microbiological Sampling FY19 Total Coliform 1,793.00 60 Enterprise Fund AUTO SHADES, INC.Capital Vehicle Window Tinting C21113 250.00 60 Enterprise Fund BAIRD OIL Annual Generator Fueling @ Well sites 1,940.81 60 Enterprise Fund BILLING DOCUMENT SPECIALISTS 19-007 FY19 01/21 Statement & Delinquent Notce Processing 9,226.46 60 Enterprise Fund BOISE RIGGING SUPPLY Crane 1-3 inspections at S. Black Cat lift station (3 qty)300.00 60 Enterprise Fund BOISE RIGGING SUPPLY Crane inspections at main plant (9 qty)600.00 60 Enterprise Fund BOISE RIGGING SUPPLY Crane inspections at N. Black Cat lift station (2 qty)200.00 60 Enterprise Fund BRIAN & HILARY DIEHL Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 3017 W. Ravenhurst St.73.59 60 Enterprise Fund BRIANNE CHILDERS Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 405 E. Sedgewick St.54.81 60 Enterprise Fund BRUCE HARTMAN Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 2234 N. Kubik Pl 56.97 60 Enterprise Fund BUSY BEE SAND & GRAVEL, INC.Haul Out of Asphalt 30.00 60 Enterprise Fund CAREER UNIFORMS Sweatshirt with Logo, J. Rodriguez Qty 1 44.40 60 Enterprise Fund CARL BIRCH Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 2660 W. Forecast St.44.50 60 Enterprise Fund CHERIE GREENHALGH Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 1089 N. Lambert Way 106.24 60 Enterprise Fund CHRISTOPHER COUNSIL & ANNY SOUVANHNA Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 648 S. Woodhaven Ave.41.63 Date: 1/24/19 12:38:10 PM Page: 4Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 567 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund CLINT DOLSBY Reimburse: C. Dolsby, airfare, WEF Conf., Fort Lauderdale FL 418.50 60 Enterprise Fund COLUMBIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY Breaker to replace electrical to compressor 122.40 60 Enterprise Fund CORE & MAIN LP M7H Traffic Repair Kit for 1977 Qty 3 294.60 60 Enterprise Fund CORE & MAIN LP Paint Wand, Joint Compression Coupler Qty 13 281.22 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY 10w3 Oil for Generator Qty 3 17.97 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Muck boots for Murray Jones 161.99 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Safety Hig Vis Rain Jacket & High Vis Sweatshirt Qty 2 169.98 60 Enterprise Fund DAVID SALISBURY Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 4872 W. Shirdale Ct.26.11 60 Enterprise Fund DC ENGINEERING 19-0070 SCADA filter replacement @ S. Black Cat lift station 3,468.50 60 Enterprise Fund DC ENGINEERING 19-0070 Troubleshooting pump trouble at S. Black Cat ls 125.00 60 Enterprise Fund DEPT OF HEALTH & WELFARE NPDES testing ( 9 qty)675.00 60 Enterprise Fund DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC 19-0016 Ferric Chloride (47,400 lbs)8,404.02 60 Enterprise Fund ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS, INC.TSS filters (10 qty box of 100)344.90 60 Enterprise Fund EWING CO., INC.18-0354,WEll 32 pumping facility const. 12/1-12/31/18 120,554.09 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY 5 Gal Bucket Qty 6 29.94 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Compartment W latch for Tool Organation Qty 1 37.66 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY SS FHN SS HCS Qty 20 43.45 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0135 LF OMNI T6 MTR T6 Laying Qty 1 4,275.93 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0135 Water Meters, 100 DN ACT PAK w 4-20MA Qty 2 1,795.78 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0138 Water Meters, Qty 128 SR2 TRPL 16,468.48 Date: 1/24/19 12:38:10 PM Page: 5Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 568 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0138 Water Meters, Qty 27 M520M F1 Sgl 4,301.00 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0138 Water Meters, SR2 TRPL Qty 128 16,468.48 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0183 Water Meter M520M Dbl Qty 54, M520M Sgl Qty 27 12,550.52 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0183 Water Meters Credit for incorrect charges 128 Accus. (16,803.84) 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0183 Water Meters Qty 27 M520M Sgl, Qty 39 Dbl 8,330.43 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0183 Water Meters, 3/4inch Accustream Qty 128 16,803.84 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0183 Water Meters, Aty 128 TRPL 6 ER WH SMRT 16,803.84 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0183 Water Meters, M520M Dble Qty 81, M520M Sgl Qty 27 18,768.51 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0183 Water Meters, Qty 116 Accu, Qty 12 SR2s 16,803.84 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0183 Water Meters, Qty 128 TRPL 6 ER WH SMRT 16,803.84 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0183 Water Meters, Qty 27 M520M Sgl, Qty 39 M520M Dbl 11,266.89 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.19-0183 Water Meters, Qty 28 2inch OMNIC2, Qty 4 OMNIC2MRT 46,461.16 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.A423 HYD 60 6 MJ OL Qty 1 2,241.17 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Mueller Hydrant A423 HYD 50 6 MJ Qty 1 2,146.06 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Short Flare Nut Qty 16 16.43 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Water Meters Credit for Incorrect Billing Ref Inv 0700805 (16,468.48) 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Water Meters Credit for Incorrect Pricing by Vendor (11,266.89) 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Water Meters Credit Vendor billed incorrectly Ref# 0702254-1 (16,803.84) 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Water Meters, Credit for Incorrect Pricing by Vendor Qty 27 (2,905.58) 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Microscope slides for operations; nitrile gloves (12 qty)1,263.60 Date: 1/24/19 12:38:10 PM Page: 6Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 569 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund GAIL BRADBURY Refund Wat/Sew/Trash 2524 W Piazza Rd 61.94 60 Enterprise Fund GERALD & THERESA MOHR Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 2684 N. Englewood Way 64.55 60 Enterprise Fund H.D. FOWLER COMPANY Brass Gate Valve, Meter Key Qty 8 293.56 60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY Reactive phos test kit & nitrate test kit for operations (19 1,147.04 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 6x8 Concrete LW Block 2x4 Stud Qty 9 18.72 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Alum Framing Square Qty 1 14.97 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Alum Wall Mount Hose Reel for Well 22 Qty 1 94.98 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Caulk, door knobs & shims for confined space safety unit (9 89.29 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Painting supplies for safety confined space unit (17 qty)48.00 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Truck Bed Coating, Wire Lock Pins Qty 3 13.86 60 Enterprise Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Wide Mouth Wall Bag, Comold Tip, Pipe Wrench Qty 5 109.86 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO TOOL & EQUIPMENT Bench Vice Qty 1 295.00 60 Enterprise Fund INDIAN COVE LLC & TRINITY HOME MTG C/O RON TROMPKEY Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 1775 N. Hickory Way 108.73 60 Enterprise Fund INTEGRITY INSPECTION SOLUTIONS Line Wat/Sewer Repair at Pine 43 CCTV, Trip Charge, Sanitize 525.00 60 Enterprise Fund INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 6v 10AH SLA Faston, Plant Repairs, Exit Sign Battery Qty 6 108.74 60 Enterprise Fund JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES INC Bank Fees December 2018 559.42 60 Enterprise Fund JEFFERY DELAPP Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 3713 N. Barron Way 59.40 60 Enterprise Fund JIM & KIM DIXON Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 6809 N. Pira Ave.73.52 60 Enterprise Fund JOHN & BECKY SUTCLIFFE Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 1749 W. Greenhead Dr.64.43 60 Enterprise Fund KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES Ball bearings for fan in wet well at S. Black Cat lift stati 260.10 Date: 1/24/19 12:38:10 PM Page: 7Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 570 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund KB FABRICATION & WELDING INC.Alum Chute for Placement on Valve Truck Bed Qty 1 300.00 60 Enterprise Fund KEVIN & KELLY MCDONALD Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 4284 S. Highcliff Ave.26.13 60 Enterprise Fund LAYNE of IDAHO, INC.Pull and Inspect of Pump & Motor @ Well 20B 1,850.00 60 Enterprise Fund LAYNE of IDAHO, INC.Well 28,well pump,motor,labor,insp as of 1/17/19 2,144.00 60 Enterprise Fund METROQUIP, INC.2.0 GPM Nozzle Pill Qty 2 109.00 60 Enterprise Fund METROQUIP, INC.Primary and Secondary Filters HIno C20663 Qty 2 584.22 60 Enterprise Fund MICHAEL & CINDY CHAPPELL Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 2595 W. Santa Clara Dr.73.55 60 Enterprise Fund MODERN PRINTERS Invoice coding labels (1,000 qty)55.00 60 Enterprise Fund MODERN PRINTERS Printing Invoice Labels Qty 1000 55.00 60 Enterprise Fund MOUNTAIN WATERWORKS, INC Engineering required for structural analysis of confined spa 2,461.25 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Metric bolts for stock (1 qty)0.94 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Metric nuts & bolts (2,671 qty)754.44 60 Enterprise Fund MYFLEETCENTER.COM Signature Oil Change C20028 51.90 60 Enterprise Fund NATHAN & ALANA CHAPMAN Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 2686 N. Snow Goose Way 80.00 60 Enterprise Fund NIKOLAS & MOLLY THOMAS Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 2950 N. Elsinore Way 214.66 60 Enterprise Fund O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Shop rags for cleaning (2 qty)15.98 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN AAA Batteries, Mail Labels Envelopes, Ink Refil Qty 5 151.79 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Combind plastic covers (1 bx)62.99 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Pens, 3 month wall calendars & labels (8 qty)124.73 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Sharpie Markers Blue Qty 1 2.69 Date: 1/24/19 12:38:10 PM Page: 8Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 571 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE VALUE - MERIDIAN Wall Clock, Sharpie Markers, Coffee Creamer Qty 12 123.53 60 Enterprise Fund OXARC, INC.19-0010 Sodium Hypochlorite Delivery 1550gl 2,568.50 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Exit Sign Well 28 Qty 2 81.61 60 Enterprise Fund POLYDYNE INC 19-0009 Polymer (2,300 lbs)2,785.30 60 Enterprise Fund RICHARD & DEBRA MANNING Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 1690 NW 13th Ave.109.02 60 Enterprise Fund THE UPS STORE NPDES sample shipping 104.41 60 Enterprise Fund TIM & SUZANNE ANSTINE Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 3481 E. Dartmoor Ct.73.23 60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE 02065-001 Life Insurance premiums 4,145.15 60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE Group #2065A United Heritage vol life ins January 2019 856.47 60 Enterprise Fund US WATER SERVICES INC 18-0204 19-0151 Well22 Filter Equipment as of 12/31/18 FINAL 78,040.00 60 Enterprise Fund USIC LOCATING SERVICES LLC Digline/Translore Service Fee 12/1 to 12/30/19 195.00 60 Enterprise Fund VIVIAN & CURTIS WATSON Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 1420 NE 2 1/2 St.61.12 60 Enterprise Fund WARREN & LORRIE ZELLMER Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 793 S. Thornwood Way 60.46 60 Enterprise Fund WILLIAM & CANDY HASH Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 1734 E. Bowstring St.71.49 60 Enterprise Fund XEROX CORPORATION - PASADENA 8TB570607 b/w (558 qty) & color (810 qty) images 43.29 Total 60 Enterprise Fund 401,761.59 Report Total 521,395.57 Date: 1/24/19 12:38:10 PM Page: 9Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 572 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 Z Project File Number: Item Title: AP Invoices for Payment 1/31/19- $151,213.36 Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.Z. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - AP Invoices for P ayment 1/31/19- $151,213.36 C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate I nvoices for Payment Cover Memo 1/31/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/31/2019 - 12:56 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 573 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund AFLAC Jan 19 Aflac 3,636.28 01 General Fund DISCOVERY BENEFITS Flex Jan 19 22,849.30 01 General Fund IAFF LOCAL 4627 #4627 Firefighters Dues Jan 2019 6,577.34 01 General Fund KEYBANK City of Meridian HSA Contributions Jan 2019 26,839.99 01 General Fund NAGE Local R-14 687 Jan 2019 28.00 01 General Fund NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS, INC January 2019 Pre Tax Contributions 38,670.26 01 General Fund NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS, INC January 2019 Roth Contributions 12,861.95 01 General Fund OREGON CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM #410000000121812 Nicholas A Butler Jan 2019 546.00 01 General Fund SARAH HERRICK Per Diem: S. Herrick, CPTED Course, Las Vegas NV,335.50 01 General Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE FICA Third Party STD benefit payment 1,324.40 01 General Fund UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY #17426 January 2019 Contributions 401.59 Total 01 General Fund 114,070.61 60 Enterprise Fund ADA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE #18007695 M Edwards Jan 2019 591.30 60 Enterprise Fund AFLAC Jan 19 Aflac 625.79 60 Enterprise Fund DISCOVERY BENEFITS Flex Jan 19 7,897.70 60 Enterprise Fund KEYBANK City of Meridian HSA Contributions Jan 2019 19,975.00 60 Enterprise Fund NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS, INC January 2019 Pre Tax Contributions 5,409.93 60 Enterprise Fund NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS, INC January 2019 Roth Contributions 2,281.93 60 Enterprise Fund UNITED HERITAGE INSURANCE FICA Third Party STD benefit payment 301.10 60 Enterprise Fund UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY #17426 January 2019 Contributions 60.00 Total 60 Enterprise Fund 37,142.75 Report Total 151,213.36 Date: 1/31/19 12:39:59 PM Page: 1Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 574 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 AA Project File Number: Item Title: AP Invoices for Payment 1/31/19- $152.50 Meeting Notes: 9 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.A A . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - AP Invoices for P ayment 1/31/19- $152.50 C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate I nvoices for Payment Cover Memo 1/31/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/31/2019 - 12:57 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 575 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund CHRIS SIEMS C Siems Pre Employment Background 02/3 - 02/5/19 Spokane WA 152.50 Total 01 General Fund 152.50 Report Total 152.50 Date: 1/31/19 12:39:26 PM Page: 1Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 576 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 6 AB Project File Number: Item Title: AP Invoices for Payment 2/6/19- $751,388.38 Meeting Notes: 9 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 6.A B . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - AP Invoices for P ayment 2/6/19- $751,388.38 C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate I nvoices for Payment Cover Memo 1/31/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/31/2019 - 12:57 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 577 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund ADA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Phone Translation Service for Nov 2018 52.70 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS oil & filters for Fuller Park equipment - qty 3 14.92 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS oil for Fuller Park mowers - qty 3 13.77 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS spark plugs & v-belt for small engines - qty 24 76.69 01 General Fund ADVANCE AUTO PARTS tail light lens for Blue Box Trailer #1 - qty 1 1.78 01 General Fund ADVANTAGE GEAR 19-0215 220/ 2 pr wildland pants 359.90 01 General Fund ADVANTAGE GEAR 19-0215 220/ 7 pr wildland pants 1,275.43 01 General Fund ADVANTAGE GEAR 19-0215 220/12 pair wildland pants 2,249.40 01 General Fund ADVANTAGE GEAR 19-0215 220/8 pr wildland pants 1,459.22 01 General Fund ALEXANDER CLARK PRINTING Payroll Checks # 22520-23020 x qnty 501 148.71 01 General Fund AMERICAN SOC LANDSCAPE ARCHITE 4/1/19-3/31/20 Membership Renewal Brian McClure 455.00 01 General Fund AUTO SPRING CORP front lift for truck 20 plow 350.95 01 General Fund BIG DADDY'S BBQ Taste of Meridian Catering & Permit Fee, 2/6/19 565.00 01 General Fund BOE - Boise Office Equipment 220/staples for copier 48.50 01 General Fund BOUNDTREE MEDICAL 220/trauma bag 260.99 01 General Fund BRADY INDUSTRIES, LLC.220/detergent, liners, towels, St. 5 148.17 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Alignment After Front End Damage DR# 18-8828 Unit #104 60.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC LOF & Front Brakes for Unit # 166 799.78 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC LOF, Blue Ford Fusion #318723 50.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC LOF, Grey Ford Fusion #193849 50.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC LOF, Rear Brakes, Cabin Filter for Unit # 157 500.88 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC LOF, Wipers, Serpentine Belt for Unit # 160 208.69 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil & Filter Change - Fleet Equinox - Lic#C19536 Vin#130122 50.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change Unit # 36 55.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil Change, Air Filters for Unit # 49 112.20 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Tire Replacement for Unit # 165 156.00 01 General Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Tires for Unit # 12 514.36 01 General Fund CANYON TRUCK UPFITTERS D-ring, breakaway cable for trailer - qty 37 512.77 01 General Fund CANYON TRUCK UPFITTERS E track & hardware for Market Trailer - qty 56 574.35 01 General Fund CARPENTER SCREEN PRINTING 2018 Fall Basketball champion shirts - qty 38 302.10 01 General Fund CARPENTER SCREEN PRINTING 2018 Fall Volleyball champion shirts - qty 135 1,073.25 01 General Fund CDW GOVERNMENT 19-0079 BTO HP 640 G4 I7-8550U 512/8 W10P 21 notebook comput 26,460.00 01 General Fund CDW GOVERNMENT 19-0079 HP 5YR NBD Disk Retention DT Only, HP 5Y PUR/Disrete 5,775.00 01 General Fund CDW GOVERNMENT BTO HP 640 G4 i7-8550U 512/8 1,260.00 01 General Fund CDW GOVERNMENT HP 5Yr Pur/Diskretention NB Only Svc 150.00 01 General Fund CDW GOVERNMENT Kramer AD-Ring-2 HDMI Adapter Ring 92.41 Date: 1/31/19 12:38:37 PM Page: 1Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 578 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund CENTURYLINK Fuller Park Mobile to Mobile & Long Distance Service 1/10 - 161.72 01 General Fund CENTURYLINK Home Court, PD DSL, Centrex Phone Lines, 1/19 867.00 01 General Fund CHICAGO CONNECTION Taste of Meridian Catering & Permit Fee, 2/6/19 565.00 01 General Fund CHRISTIE BOUCHER Education Reimbursement C.Boucher Fall2018 Riverside College 984.78 01 General Fund CITY OF MERIDIAN PETTY CASH Reimbursement for U/C Operations 775.00 01 General Fund CLOVERDALE PLUMBING COMPANY reset toilet & urinal at Settlers Park 588.24 01 General Fund COBALT TRUCK EQUIPMENT 220/dropdown ladder for Pub Ed Van, MF026 3,283.00 01 General Fund COMMERCIAL TIRE 220/4 new tires, MF036 622.24 01 General Fund COMMERCIAL TIRE C14304-Taurus-New Battery 137.22 01 General Fund CUSTOM GATE AUTOMATION Lanark Parks Shop main gate maintenance 150.00 01 General Fund CUSTOM IMAGE, LLC coat embroidery for city uniforms - qty 4 64.00 01 General Fund CUSTOM ROTO-MOLDING, INC ice melt tank for truck 20 - qty 1 229.90 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY caulk for Settlers Park toilet repair - qty 2 5.18 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY credit & price adjustment on irrigation boots - qty 1 pair (52.50) 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY Dog Food for K9 Wyatt 95.98 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY Dog Food/ Suppliment for K9 Randy, Kennel Locks 119.95 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY hardware, hose, & waste scooper for Bark Park - qty 12 180.88 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY irrigation boots - qty 1 pair 67.49 01 General Fund D & B SUPPLY tension straps for Farmers Market trailer - qty 2 33.98 01 General Fund DELL MARKETING L.P.VLA VMWare Basic Support/Subscription Vsphere 6 Ent Plus x23 17,770.09 01 General Fund DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS, INC.220/ladder inspection for aerial, T-1, MF021 775.00 01 General Fund DONE RITE TREE CO.Generations Plaza Christmas tree removal - qty 1 650.00 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO 220/lights, st. 1, 2 wallpacks, 1 bollard post 245.21 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO ballast for Storey Park lights - qty 1 16.90 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO light switches for Storey Park restrooms - qty 4 5.45 01 General Fund ELECTRICAL WHOLESALE SUPPLY CO photo cells for Gordon Harris Park restroom - qty 2 62.57 01 General Fund ERGOMETRICS 220/Captains Promotional written tests 1,536.92 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY bolts for Bark Park fence repair - qty 25 11.02 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY drill bit & screws - qty 501 63.77 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY nuts for Bark Park fence repair - qty 50 3.98 01 General Fund FASTENAL COMPANY repair flag clips for Fuller Park - qty 9 17.39 01 General Fund FBINAA ASSOCIATES Annual FBINAA Membership Dues - J.Lavey 105.00 01 General Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.replacement seat for Bark Park toilet & inventory - qty 4 95.14 01 General Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.urinals for Seasons Park restroom - qty 2; PD case #18-8596 481.18 01 General Fund G & R AG PRODUCTS INC parts for ice melt tank on truck 20 - qty 7 13.84 01 General Fund G & R AG PRODUCTS INC parts for truck 20 ice melt tank - qty 8 66.77 Date: 1/31/19 12:38:37 PM Page: 2Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 579 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER & SUPPLY CO cleaners for park restrooms - qty 4 cases 343.44 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER & SUPPLY CO park restroom air freshener - qty 2 cases 85.72 01 General Fund GEM STATE PAPER & SUPPLY CO trash can lids for all parks - qty 9 cases 615.60 01 General Fund GOPHER SPORT Fitness Equipment, Boxes & Foam for Fitness Center 1,987.83 01 General Fund HERB GRIFFIN Per Diem: H. Grif NFA Course Emittsburg, MD 02/16 - 02/23/19 457.50 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Evidence Shop Supplies-Shelving Clips/Strips 51.74 01 General Fund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES handles, scrub brushes, squeeges for Lanark Parks Shop x 30 166.44 01 General Fund IACP POLICY CENTER Annual IACP Membership Dues for J.Lavey/Agency 240.00 01 General Fund IACP POLICY CENTER Annual IACP Membership Dues for T.Basterrechea 190.00 01 General Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Business Cards for Crystal Ritchie 46.25 01 General Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Office Supplies 46.25 01 General Fund IDAHO CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES Refund to ICI for invoice #030606 46.25 01 General Fund IDAHO FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION 220/IFCA membership, JB-CB-KF-JO-MN - 1-1-19 to 1-1-20 790.00 01 General Fund IDAHO POWER Fire Department Power - January - 2019 2,061.50 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice 68.08 01 General Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE legal Notices 151.71 01 General Fund IDAHO STATESMAN posting confiscated vehicles DR18-6379 98.38 01 General Fund IDAHO TOOL & EQUIPMENT blow gun, tap, nozzle, plugs - qty 7 38.64 01 General Fund IIMC Annual Membership to IIMC - C.Jay Coles - 2019 210.00 01 General Fund INTERMOUNTAIN GAS 0981623008 January 2019 7,186.08 01 General Fund JOHNSTONE SUPPLY fan blower for Chateau Park restroom - qty 1 155.25 01 General Fund JS CAKES, INC. / NOTHING BUNDT CAKES Taste of Meridian Catering & Permit Fee, 2/6/19 565.00 01 General Fund KANAK ATTACK CATERING Taste of Meridian Catering & Permit Fee, 2/6/19 565.00 01 General Fund KENDALL FORD OF MERIDIAN seatbelt replacement for recreation van 280.19 01 General Fund KIMBALL MIDWEST rust converter spray & hose clamps - qty 146 273.90 01 General Fund LARSON-MILLER, INC 220/medical waste disposal @ St. 3 88.16 01 General Fund LARSON-MILLER, INC Evidence Bio-Hazard Pick-up/destruction 313.16 01 General Fund LAWN EQUIPMENT COMPANY parts for Fuller Park mower maintenance - qty 20 129.84 01 General Fund LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER Kleiner golf cart tire - qty 1 66.49 01 General Fund LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC.Level 3 Communications Telephone, Jan 2019, 268238 975.98 01 General Fund LOWE'S 220/BBQ Grill, St. 5 426.55 01 General Fund LOWE'S Tools, electrical inspectors, Marking paint inspectors 164.88 01 General Fund LOWE'S Truck Storage Box for Unit # 46 248.89 01 General Fund LS REFEREEING 19-0050 basketball officials 1/21-1/24/19 - qty 11 games 687.50 Date: 1/31/19 12:38:37 PM Page: 3Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 580 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund LS REFEREEING 19-0050 Winter Basketball officials 1/14-1/17/19 x 13 games 812.50 01 General Fund LS REFEREEING 19-0050 winter season basketball officials 1/8-1/10/19 x 9 562.50 01 General Fund M.D. WILLIS, INC.Court Reporting 1/2/19 - 1/22/19 2,502.00 01 General Fund M2M WIRELESS cell phone antenna for Fuller & Discovery Parks - qty 2 72.50 01 General Fund M2M WIRELESS Parks Modem to Modem Service 12/17 - 1/16/19 265.27 01 General Fund MINUTEMAN, INC.Lock Opened for Drug Search, DR 18-0266 95.00 01 General Fund MINUTEMAN, INC.Open Safe From Evidence Before Disposal 78.15 01 General Fund MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS Storey Park firehose fittings - qty 12 57.60 01 General Fund MOTOROLA Portable Radio Batteries - qty 15 1,226.40 01 General Fund NAPA AUTO PARTS Wiper Blades for Unit # 23 22.58 01 General Fund NAPA AUTO PARTS Wipers for Unit # 11 18.98 01 General Fund NEW CAVANAUGH LLC Partial Release of Surety 2018-0138 Caven Ridge Estates West 98,345.50 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.220/Envelopes 9.30 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.220/Office supplies, pens, binders, tape 82.35 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Batteries, forks, markers, toner, self inking date stamp 205.58 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.binders & tap dividers - qty 10 47.00 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.black printer toner for Settlers Shop - qty 2 108.82 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Calendars for HR Conference Rooms qty 3 36.87 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.electronic pointer/presentation tool for training slideshow 97.18 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Mouse pads, plan Review 27.98 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Notebook, Plan Review team 22.47 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Office Supplies 218.50 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Office Supplies - Wrist Rest - Cortni K.9.75 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Office Supplies, self stick easel (2pk), letter tray (1)35.51 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Paper, folders, correction tape, post its, binders, etc. HR 121.57 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.paper, markers, pens - qty 7 93.42 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Pens, File Folders For HR Office 21.83 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Pens, Post-its, Post-Card mailers, Note Pads 132.70 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.post-its, markers, tape, pens, paper, highlighter, clips; 13 116.08 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.staff desk name plates x 4; holders x 2 60.94 01 General Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Tape, MP, 1.90x54.6 6pk Cl, Swiffer Duster, Tape, Trans 3m 33.12 01 General Fund OFFICE TEAM Temp Svcs - J. Larson 1/11/19 940.50 Date: 1/31/19 12:38:37 PM Page: 4Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 581 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund REDGATE SOFTWARE Support & Upgrades package for SQL Compare, Support & Upgrad 723.87 01 General Fund RICOH USA, INC Ink Cartridges for Patrol Copier/Printer Overnight Shipping 45.00 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC 220/Sign repair, St. 5 295.00 01 General Fund SIGNS, ETC Custom lettering for City Hall 88.00 01 General Fund SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE American Power Conversion APC by Schneider Electric Smart-UP 940.90 01 General Fund SUNBELT RENTALS track skidsteer for Bark Park pea gravel 1/9-1/10/19 382.00 01 General Fund SUNROC CORPORATION Fuller Park road mix for Blackstone Pathway repair 2.99 tons 29.90 01 General Fund SUNROC CORPORATION pea gravel for Bark Park - qty 31.34 tons 1,057.52 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 220/Binders & laminating pouches for training, Academy 531.79 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON 220/Otterbox belt clip for cell phones qty 2 16.44 01 General Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Surface case K Wooddell 19.99 01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP 19-0214 220/uniforms, hats, tshirts, qty 464 6,681.21 01 General Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP 220/printing on furnished stock, qty 5 51.25 01 General Fund THE BLIND GALLERY Blinds for Window in CAU 386.00 01 General Fund THE BOISE CO-OP Taste of Meridian Catering & Permit Fee, 2/6/19 565.00 01 General Fund THE CURB BAR AND GRILL, LLC Taste of Meridian Catering & Permit Fee, 2/6/19 565.00 01 General Fund THE ULI FOUNDATION Refund overpymt Cameron Ariel ULI Conf Oct 2018 595.00 01 General Fund THE UPS STORE Postage to Send Evidence to Lab 51.60 01 General Fund TONY CHANCE Reimburse, T.Chance, Education Assist, Fire Dynamics 860.00 01 General Fund TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES HVAC 26520 winter maintenance at Homecourt 435.00 01 General Fund TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES HVAC 26525 winter maintenance at Lanark Parks Shop 125.00 01 General Fund TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES HVAC 26526 winter maintenance at Community Center 165.00 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR 19-0214 220/Uniforms, belts, shirts, jackets, qty 95 4,551.10 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR Body Armor for Childers 821.16 01 General Fund UNIFORMS 2 GEAR Sample Blue Traffic Shirt for Demo 56.70 01 General Fund UPSON COMPANY 220/Roof repair, St. 3 2,000.00 01 General Fund USSSOA 19-0051 volleyball officials 1/21-1/25/19 - qty 60 games 1,337.43 01 General Fund USSSOA 19-0051 volleyball officiating 1/14-1/18/19 x 62 games 1,382.01 01 General Fund USSSOA 19-0051 volleyball officiating 12/17/18-1/11/19 x 117 games 2,607.98 01 General Fund USSSOA basketball officials 1/14-1/18/19 - qty 3 games 197.58 01 General Fund USSSOA basketball officials 1/21-1/25/19 - qty 3 games 197.58 01 General Fund USSSOA basketball officials 1/7-1/11/19 - qty 5.5 games 660.70 Date: 1/31/19 12:38:37 PM Page: 5Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 582 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00001 Data Plan #1, 12/21 - 1/20/2019 901.81 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00002 Cellphones - 12/21 - 01/20/19 8,255.59 01 General Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00003 Data Plan #2 - 12/21 - 1/20/19 683.00 01 General Fund WAHOOZ FAMILY FUN ZONE Taste of Meridian Catering 2/6/19 500.00 01 General Fund WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES 220/hose equipment, TNT tips, qty 32 309.25 01 General Fund ZONES Double Cell/LTE Connecting via SMA Double WiFi Connecting vi 177.00 Total 01 General Fund 242,589.22 07 Impact Fund FASTENAL COMPANY bolts for Discovery Park water log - qty 10 8.93 07 Impact Fund JAMESTOWN ADVANCED PRODUCTS Discovery picnic table frames, hardware, posts, & ADA grills 9,917.00 07 Impact Fund M2M WIRELESS cell phone antenna for Fuller & Discovery Parks - qty 2 72.50 07 Impact Fund STRATA, INC.18-0306 materials testing for Discovery Park - 11/5-12/31/18 3,975.00 07 Impact Fund SUNBELT RENTALS Boom forklift for Discovery Park water log moving 1/9-10/19 985.52 Total 07 Impact Fund 14,958.95 60 Enterprise Fund A COMPANY INC WRRF Cap.Exp. porta potty services 12/10-1/6/19 99.63 60 Enterprise Fund AL & CAROL ARNZEN Customer overpaid 1216 E Paririefire St 673.08 60 Enterprise Fund ANDREW & SARAH HIGUERA Refund,Wat/Sew/Trash,2937 S. Broken Limb Ave.537.48 60 Enterprise Fund BOISE APPLIANCE & REFRIGERATIO Annual Ice Machine Cleaning & Service Admin Bldg 388.33 60 Enterprise Fund BRIAN RULE Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 640 W. Woodbury Dr.133.52 60 Enterprise Fund BRUNEEL TIRE OF MERIDIAN LLC Oil/filter change, replaced cooler pipes, 4 tie rods, C4707 918.03 60 Enterprise Fund CAREER UNIFORMS Hat w Logo C. Ambroz Qty 1 17.85 60 Enterprise Fund CAREER UNIFORMS Jacket w/logo for RMurray 72.95 Date: 1/31/19 12:38:37 PM Page: 6Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 583 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund CARL'S CYCLE SALES Fender to repair 2006 Kawasaki Mule 103.21 60 Enterprise Fund CARL'S CYCLE SALES Shift lever to repair 2006 Kawasaki Mule 30.16 60 Enterprise Fund CARL'S CYCLE SALES Starter to repair 2006 Kawasaki Mule 374.37 60 Enterprise Fund CENTURYLINK Home Court, PD DSL, Centrex Phone Lines, 1/19 653.80 60 Enterprise Fund CORE & MAIN LP 19-0136 Bicent PRV Parts, 8F6102 FLG, 6 S92 Standon Saddle S 1,713.65 60 Enterprise Fund CORE & MAIN LP 19-0136 Bicent PRV Parts, Gate Valve Flex Pipe Qty 112 5,751.05 60 Enterprise Fund CORE & MAIN LP 19-0136 Bicent. PRV Parts, 8inch Singer & 6inch Singer Qty 2 17,136.82 60 Enterprise Fund CORE & MAIN LP 19-0136 Bicent. PRV Parts, Brass Bushing, NYL Sad Qty 10 194.00 60 Enterprise Fund CORE & MAIN LP Clow Medallion Fire Hydrant Qty 1 2,143.01 60 Enterprise Fund CORE & MAIN LP Credit for Return of Traffic Repair Kit Qty 3 (264.60) 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Duratote box for cleaning supplies 18.49 60 Enterprise Fund D & B SUPPLY Propane Cylinder Sledge Hammer Qty 2 36.98 60 Enterprise Fund DYKMAN ELECTRICAL, INC 19-0093 12,059.92 60 Enterprise Fund DYKMAN ELECTRICAL, INC 19-0094 Sole Source Well 16c 75 HP Yaskawa VFD Replacements 15,420.92 60 Enterprise Fund DYKMAN ELECTRICAL, INC 19-0095 125HP Yaskawa VFD Replacement Well21 21,264.19 60 Enterprise Fund DYKMAN ELECTRICAL, INC 50HP, 75HP, 125HP output Filters Qty 3 2,314.00 60 Enterprise Fund EDGE ANALYTICAL, INC.NPDES testing 92.00 60 Enterprise Fund ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS, INC.TSS filters (4 pks)364.05 60 Enterprise Fund ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS, INC.TSS filters (6 pks)540.29 60 Enterprise Fund EWING CO., INC.18-0415,18-0447,18-0449,WRRF Headworks const. 12/1-12/31/18 263,822.00 Date: 1/31/19 12:38:37 PM Page: 7Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 584 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY AG Jobber Qty 3 12.80 60 Enterprise Fund FASTENAL COMPANY Black nitrile textured industrial gloves w/cuff (2 bxs)48.99 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Brass Bushings Qty 1 12.21 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Chain S Hook, Upper Steam Qty 102 649.08 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Meter Vault Qty 6 718.76 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Muellar Centurion 5-6in Hydrant Qty 1 2,193.65 60 Enterprise Fund FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.Vacuum relief valve to replace air relief valve on sewer lin 3,583.34 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC 10mL pipets (1 cs)153.06 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC Glucose-glutamic acid (3 qty)100.74 60 Enterprise Fund FISHER SCIENTIFIC pH electrode - qty 1 441.17 60 Enterprise Fund GRANT MECHANICAL, INC Annual maintenance of boilers in Lab (9 hrs)892.50 60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY Ammonia test vials (4 qty)233.96 60 Enterprise Fund HACH COMPANY Turbidity standards kit 370.51 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO PRESS-TRIBUNE Legal Notice 233.16 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO TOOL & EQUIPMENT Tipped Hole Saw, Drill Bit, Mag Tool Qty 4 89.56 60 Enterprise Fund IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT License plate renewal 2003 Chev Blazer #K131840 23.00 60 Enterprise Fund INTERMOUNTAIN GAS 0981623008 January 2019 11,090.23 60 Enterprise Fund JOE ANN PATRICK Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 2692 W. Willard St.24.69 60 Enterprise Fund KATHRYN RUTAN Refund, Wat/Sew/Trash, 3258 W. Wave Dr.44.70 60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.19-0148 QLPE Svcs 12/1-31/18 West Medical Ofc Bldg-1 sheet 290.00 Date: 1/31/19 12:38:37 PM Page: 8Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 585 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC.19-0164 Meridian/Linder Sewer design service 12/1-12/31/18 1,345.00 60 Enterprise Fund LAYNE of IDAHO, INC.19-0138 50hp 3 stage submersible Motor, Rewire & Startup 9,677.00 60 Enterprise Fund LAYNE of IDAHO, INC.19-0140 75HP Submeriable Motor Well 16c, Wire Setup, SS Blow 12,967.00 60 Enterprise Fund LOWE'S Ball end hex, tape, wire stripper, precision SE, pliers (7 q 131.36 60 Enterprise Fund MASTER ROOTER PLUMBING Bittercreek Lagoon emergency pumping (20.5 hrs)3,485.00 60 Enterprise Fund MATERIALS TESTING & INSPECTION 17-0365,WRRF Headworks Special Insp 12/24-1/5/19 106.20 60 Enterprise Fund MATERIALS TESTING & INSPECTION 17-0365,WRRF Headworks Upgrades Testing 12/10-12/23/18 76.20 60 Enterprise Fund MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS Clear PVC poly braid hose (50 ft)120.50 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Cam lok parts & steel nipples to repair compressor (29 qty) 282.69 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Clorox bleach foam spray 51.62 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Electrical connectors & zip ties for stock (102 qty)31.35 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Pipe fittings, pipe hangers, threaded rod & hose reels (37 q 1,137.27 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Refund for double charge clorox bleach (51.62) 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Rubber, vinyl & fabric tape for stock (9 qty)196.65 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Safety glasses (36 qty)175.32 60 Enterprise Fund MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Socket adapter 7.32 60 Enterprise Fund NAPA AUTO PARTS Oil filters for screw sucker vacuum pump (2 qty)5.58 60 Enterprise Fund NAPA AUTO PARTS Washer Fluid Qty 4 10.76 60 Enterprise Fund NEW CAVANAUGH LLC Partial Release of Surety 2018-0138 Caven Ridge Estates West 68,139.00 60 Enterprise Fund O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Torg Wrench Qty 1 29.99 Date: 1/31/19 12:38:37 PM Page: 9Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 586 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Batteries, forks, markers, toner, self inking date stamp 125.43 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Calendar, labels, post-its, copy paper 49.17 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.Dry Erase Boards and Marker Sets for Well Sites Qty 32 941.58 60 Enterprise Fund OFFICE DEPOT, INC.labels, tray, mousepad 42.51 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Axial fan to repair MCC9 at Digester 3 90.03 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Conduit, Connectors, Flex Alum, Screw in Conn Qty 22 307.28 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Drill Tap, Cable Ratchet, Crimp, Organge Tape Qty 270 450.80 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Ni-cd batter & emergency/exit light combo (4 qty)146.66 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Parts to upgrade interior lighting to LED (17 qty)595.28 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Parts to upgrade lighting to LED (1,423 qty)228.14 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Rectangular pull box for stock (4 qty)153.50 60 Enterprise Fund PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Square covers, square mud rings, keyless lampholder (48 qty) 55.12 60 Enterprise Fund SAWTOOTH LAW OFFICES ACHD Linder Rd, legal services to review docs 12/19/18 400.00 60 Enterprise Fund SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.Paint for confined space safety unit (2 qty)110.78 60 Enterprise Fund SIGNS, ETC Safety Lettering Reflective lettering vehicle C15281 & C2002 72.00 60 Enterprise Fund SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY Traffic control for sewer mainline cleaning 1,648.90 60 Enterprise Fund SPECIALTY PLASTICS & FAB, INC PVC threaded tee (3 qty)10.50 60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Emergency light fixture battery for maintenance bldg 12.99 60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Fluke Industrial Master Test Lead Set - qty 1 136.74 60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Fluke ProcessMeter - qty 1 899.99 Date: 1/31/19 12:38:37 PM Page: 10Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 587 of 736 City Of Meridian Invoices Selected for Payment - Invoices for Payment - Amie Code Fund Fund Title Vendor Name Invoice/Credit Description Invoice Amount 60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Hand soap for Lab 19.99 60 Enterprise Fund SYNCB/AMAZON Keyboard wrist cushion for RMurray 11.39 60 Enterprise Fund T-O ENGINEERS, INC 18-0470,WRRF Post Aeration System Study 12/1-12/31/18-FINAL 7,032.50 60 Enterprise Fund T-ZERS SHIRT SHOP jacket/Polos with logo for MLatham (3 qty)110.00 60 Enterprise Fund TATES RENTS (GENERAL OFFICE)Cable Hoist W forks Qty 1 29.00 60 Enterprise Fund THE UPS STORE Biosolid sample shipping 251.66 60 Enterprise Fund USA BLUEBOOK Inverted paint Blue Qty 6 400.89 60 Enterprise Fund USA BLUEBOOK PVC 1 Element Static mixer 144.80 60 Enterprise Fund USA BLUEBOOK Safety glasses, SS gauge, & tube assembly (16 qty)341.24 60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00001 Data Plan #1, 12/21 - 1/20/2019 1,571.25 60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00002 Cellphones - 12/21 - 01/20/19 2,513.09 60 Enterprise Fund VERIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. BELLEVUE 965467287-00003 Data Plan #2 - 12/21 - 1/20/19 81.96 60 Enterprise Fund WASTECORP PUMPS LLC Gland packing seal 386.67 60 Enterprise Fund WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES 19-0097 Flushing Hoses & Fittings Qty 15 3,574.59 60 Enterprise Fund WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES Flushing Hoses & Fittings Per Quote Qty 20 5,035.00 60 Enterprise Fund XEROX CORPORATION - PASADENA 8TB576316 b/w (2,019 qty) & color (138 qty) images 17.45 60 Enterprise Fund XEROX CORPORATION - PASADENA LX7985464 b/w (864 qty) & color (1,350 qty) images 101.85 Total 60 Enterprise Fund 493,840.21 Report Total 751,388.38 Date: 1/31/19 12:38:37 PM Page: 11Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 588 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 7 Project File Number: Item Title: Items moved from The Consent Agenda (Action Items) Meeting Notes: City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 8 A Project File Number: Item Title: Mayor's Youth Advisory Council Update Meeting Notes: www.meridiancity.org MYAC Update February 5, 2019 Legislative Breakfast www.meridiancity.org Proposed: Lowering the voting age to 17 for primaries, if the individual will be 18 by the general election. Youth Lobby Day www.meridiancity.org •Over 20 High School Participants •Partnered with American Heart Association for Safe Routes to School Community Service Fair www.meridiancity.org •Partnering with Meridian Library •MYAC Booth involvement for future event Valentines Day www.meridiancity.org •School Ambassadors plan to make over 360 Valentines Day Cards for Schools. •Valentines Day Party –February 14th I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 8.A . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - M ayor's Youth Advisory Council Update C ouncil Notes: RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.Coles, C.J ay Approved 2/1/2019 - 10:19 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 589 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 9 A Project File Number: H-2018-0042 Item Title: Request for Reconsideration for Timber Creek (H-2018- 0042) by Neighbors of Timber Creek Recycling's Illegal Heavy Industrial Use (Joshua Leonard) Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 9.A . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Request for Reconsideration for T imber C reek (H-2018-0042) by Neighbors of T imber Creek Recycling's Illegal Heavy Industrial Use (J oshua L eonard) C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Request f or Reconsideration B ackup Material 1/16/2019 A pplicant Response to Request f or Reconsideration B ackup Material 2/5/2019 Minutes from C ouncil re: Conditions of Approval B ackup Material 2/4/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.Coles, C.J ay Approved 1/31/2019 - 2:18 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 590 of 736 Request for Reconsideration - Pg. 1 December 17, 2018 Mayor Tammy de Weerd Joe Borton, Council President Luke Cavener, Council Vice President Anne Little Roberts, Council Member Ty Palmer, Council Member Treg Bernt, Council Member Genesis Milam, Council Member c/o: C. Jay Coles, City Clerk; Chris Johnson, Deputy City Clerk) Sent via email: cjcoles@meridiancity.org; cjohnson@meridiancity.org. cc: Bill Nary, City Attorney, sent via email: bnary@meridiancity.org Re: Timber Creek Recycling, Application No. H-2018- 0042; Request for Reconsideration. Dear Mayor de Weerd, Council President Borton, Council Vice President Cavener, and Members of the City Council: As neighbors of the Timber Creek Recycling site (the “subject property”), we hereby respectfully request reconsideration of the City Council’s December 4, 2018, approval of the applicant’s amended development agreement. This request for reconsideration is made pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6535, the Idaho Local Land Use Planning Act (“LLUPA,” codified as Idaho Code Title 67, Chapter 65), and Meridian City Code § 1-7-10 (entitled, “Procedure for Request for Reconsideration”). Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6535 and Meridian City Code § 1-7-10.A.2., this request is made in writing, is filed with the City Clerk, identifies specific deficiencies in the decision for which reconsideration is sought, and is made within fourteen (14) days of the “final approval” of the above-referenced application. In addition to being based upon several fatal deficiencies in the Council’s December 4, 2018, approval, this request is made in the interest of the duty owed by the Council to prudently manage public finances. If the Council fails to reconsider and reverse its approval of the above-referenced application submitted by Timber Creek Recycling for failing to apply for and obtain a CUP, as expressly required by Meridian City’s own Uniform Development Code (“UDC”), public tax dollars will needlessly be spent by the City to defend the Council’s incorrect and legally unsupported decision. At a minimum, the City must comply with its UDC and require the applicant, Timber Creek Recycling, to obtain a conditional use permit (“CUP”), which must include the UDC’s mandatory conditions for operating a heavy industrial facility within a residentially-zoned district. Based on an exhaustive review of applicable Idaho case law, we believe that we will prevail on judicial review; furthermore, Idaho case law on the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 591 of 736 Request for Reconsideration - Pg. 2 subject of CUPs is extremely well settled, so we believe that Meridian City likely will be ordered to pay the costs and attorneys’ fees we incur in requiring the City to comply with its own UDC. In addition to the reasons set forth in this Request for Reconsideration, we ask the City Council to listen to the recommendations of its staff, who possess land use and zoning expertise. City staff twice advised the City Council, in writing, to deny the application, one of which came after conditions of approval were added.1 The City Council’s December 4, 2018, approval of Timber Creek Recycling’s amended development agreement in application no. H-2018-0042 had the following specific legal deficiencies: First, the applicant, Timber Creek Recycling, missed the deadline contained in the City’s UDC for amending the development agreement. A development agreement modification may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties.2 The UDC’s deadline for amending a development agreement (“…prior to signature of the agreement by all parties”) is not supplemented or contradicted anywhere else in Meridian’s City Code. Once the development agreement was signed by all parties, the window for amending it closed. However, the City’s UDC provides a single, narrow path for the applicant, Timber Creek Recycling, to expand and extend its heavy industrial use on the subject property: Request and obtain a CUP from the City. (See “Second,” below.) In this case, the City’s failure to enforce the legal deadline for development agreement amendments violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the City’s own UDC. Second, the City’s failure to require the applicant to request and obtain a CUP is the primary basis upon which this application will be reversed on judicial review by the district court and remanded back to the City. The City’s UDC simply cannot be read to authorize the expansion or extension of a non-conforming use simply and singularly by amending a development agreement. The City’s UDC defines the applicant’s proposed use as “industrial.”3 The Planning Director categorized the proposed use as “heavy industrial.”4 Industrial uses are prohibited in the R-4 district, which is entitled “Medium Density Residential District.” To be clear, “prohibited” does not mean “allowed with a CUP;” rather, “prohibited” means that the applicable Table of Allowed Uses5 contained within the City’s UDC prohibits the applicant’s heavy industrial use from existing on the subject property, no matter what conditions are imposed to mitigate its impacts.6 However, the 2016 1 See Staff Report from Sonya Allen, Associate City Planner, dated July 17, 2018; see also Memorandum to Mayor and City Council from Planning Supervisor Bill Parsons, dated September 11, 2018. 2 UDC § 11-5B-3.F.3. (emphasis added). 3 See definition of “RECYCLING CENTER” in UDC § 11-1A-1. 4 See Staff Report dated July 17, 2018, Section V.C., on p. 2. 5 See UDC § 11-2A-2, TABLE 11-2A-2, entitled, “ALLOWED USES IN THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS,” which omits “Recycling Centers” entirely, even with a CUP. 6 The Idaho Supreme Court, in Gardiner v. Boundary Co. Bd. of Commr’s, 148 Idaho 764, 229 P.3d 369 (2010), overruled on other grounds, stated that any use not expressly authorized or designated, either as a matter of right or upon obtaining a CUP, cannot be pursued there. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 592 of 736 Request for Reconsideration - Pg. 3 development agreement expressly allowed the applicant’s current use to continue, but only to the extent that it existed on the property as of the date of annexation. In other words, the applicant’s composting facility lawfully exists on the property as a nonconforming use, but only if the applicant does not expand or extend its nonconforming use beyond the scope and intensity in which it existed in January of 2016. As neighbors of the Timber Creek Recycling facility, we told you in writing and in our public testimony that the scope and intensity of the heavy industrial use on the subject property has expanded significantly since January of 2016. We presented aerial photographs, both from Google Maps and from Ada County’s Geographic Information System (or GIS) webpage, that clearly and unquestionably showed this expansion. In response, the applicant, Timber Creek Recycling, failed to produce any credible evidence that its current operation remains at the same level it existed in January of 2016. It should have been easy for Timber Creek Recycling to provide documentary evidence of its operation, to show that it has not unlawfully expanded since January of 2016, but it failed to do so. The City’s UDC prescribes a single method to expand or extend a nonconforming use: nonconforming properties, uses, structures, or signs shall not expand or extend the nonconforming aspect of the property, use, structure, or sign unless approved subject to a conditional use permit as set forth in section 11-5B-6 of this title.7 Modifying a development agreement, without also requiring a CUP, is legally insufficient - amending the development agreement only changes the terms of that agreement between the City and the applicant, it does not (and it legally cannot) amend or strike the requirements contained in the UDC, which still mandate that the applicant must obtain a CUP to expand or extend its nonconforming use. Additionally, the Council’s failure, in its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order, to identify why the applicant was not required to obtain a CUP constitutes its own “grounds for invalidation of an approved permit or site-specific authorization… on appeal.” Idaho Code § 67-6535(2)(a) (in pertinent part). Based on the unambiguous language of the City’s own UDC, the applicant must apply for and obtain a CUP. There is no other means by which the applicant may expand and extend its heavy industrial use on the subject property. The City’s failure to require the applicant to apply for and obtain a CUP, or to explain why a CUP is not required in this matter, will constitute reversible error on judicial review. The City Attorney’s advice to the Mayor and Council during the September 18, 2018, public hearing essentially was, “The city always has done it this way [authorizing the expansion and extension of a nonforming use without requiring a conditional use permit].” A city’s established practice is not binding, however, particularly if it conflicts with express provisions of the City’s UDC, as it does in this case. A CUP IS NOT OPTIONAL. The applicant must be required to obtain a CUP, or on judicial review the district court will reverse the Council’s approval of this application and remand it back to the City for the Council to comply with the City’s UDC. 7 UDC § 11-1B-1 (emphasis added). Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 593 of 736 Request for Reconsideration - Pg. 4 Third, the City Council, by approving the applicant’s development agreement modifications without also requiring a CUP, directly violated Meridian City’s established policy on nonconforming uses, which is to… allow any nonconforming property, use, or structure… to continue until they are removed, but not to encourage their continuation.8 When harmonized with the authority granted to the applicant in the UDC to pursue expansion or extension of a nonconforming use by requesting a CUP, this policy bars the City Council from approving any expansion or extension of a nonconforming use, even when properly accomplished with a CUP application, when the result would be to encourage continuation of the nonconforming use. In the case of Timber Creek Recycling’s application, the City Council’s approval of the proposed amendments to the development agreement violated the City’s established policy against encouraging continuation of the nonconforming use. Fourth, the standard considered by the City Council in its deliberation of the application was incorrect. Instead of giving due weight to our existing, vested property rights, the Council improperly weighed the asserted benefits of the proposed expanded heavy industrial use against the harm such expansion would cause to us and to our existing, vested private property rights. This was unlawful and improper and must be corrected. The applicant has zero right to expansion or extension of its heavy industrial use on the subject property. If the City Council wanted to engage in a weighing exercise, it should have been “neighbors’ vested private property rights” vs. applicant’s complete and utter lack of vested private property rights.” Fifth, our attorney was excluded from the meetings that took place between the City Attorney and the applicant’s attorney, during which the development agreement amendments were negotiated and drafted. According to the City Attorney, the neighbors’ attorney was excluded because the development agreement is a contract between the City and the applicant. This argument may be correct, but it only serves to support the public policy behind the UDC’s requirement that the application must apply for and obtain a CUP in addition to modifying the development agreement: TRANSPARENCY. To all of us who were kept on the outside of what should have been an inclusive public process, our exclusion from negotiations provided evidence that supported our fear that the City’s approval of Timber Creek Recycling’s application was a foregone conclusion. In addition to the specific legal deficiencies attendant with the City Council’s approval of this application, several procedural errors occurred, any one of which will cause the district court to reverse the Council’s decision and remand Timber Creek Recycling’s application back to the City for compliance with Meridian City’s own UDC and our due process rights: Council Member Milam’s disclosure, made on the record at the September 18, 2018, Council Meeting, that she had visited the site of the subject property should have been made prior to opening the public hearing. We, as members of the public, had a right to testify about Council 8 UDC § 11-1B-1 (in pertinent part) (emphasis added). Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 594 of 736 Request for Reconsideration - Pg. 5 Member Milam’s prior (potentially ex parte) visit to the site, but we largely were denied that opportunity because she made her disclosure after many of us already had testified. Council Vice President Cavener’s disclosures, also made on the record at the September 18, 2018, Council Meeting, of his close personal relationship with the applicant and his acceptance of campaign contributions from the applicant should have been made prior to opening the public hearing. As with Council Member Milam’s belated disclosures, above, we had a right to testify about Council Vice President Cavener’s close personal relationship with the applicant and his acceptance of campaign contributions from the applicant, but the public largely was denied that opportunity at that public hearing, in violation of our due process rights. Over the course of the City’s process on this application, various Council Members missed one or two meetings (including public hearings) and, upon returning (in a subsequent meeting), they failed to make a record that they had caught up on the information and testimony they missed. Absent such a record, Council Members who missed one or more meetings should not have participated in subsequent meetings or hearings or in the vote to approve the application. Although Council Vice President Cavener ultimately abstained from voting on the application, he provided no basis for his abstention, thereby leaving us to guess what prompted him to abstain. Depending on the basis for Council Vice President Cavener’s abstention, perhaps he should have recused himself from the proceedings much earlier, and not participated in questioning those who provided testimony or in deliberating on motions. With no record of his basis for abstaining, we are effectively unable to challenge his participation in the process as a seemingly vocal proponent of the application. In the interests of complying with Meridian’s own UDC, prudent financial management of public funds, civic duty, and fundamental fairness, please reconsider the Council’s decision on the above- referenced application. As noted by Mayor de Weerd after the September public hearing, if the Ada County Commissioners had voted to approve an application for this type of heavy industrial facility located just outside Meridian City, there is no way the Meridian City Council would have approved it. In fact, as the Mayor mentioned, the Meridian City Council likely would have been outraged. For some reason, however, the Meridian City Council approved this application, even though it was directly contrary to the recommendations the Council received from City staff and violated the City’s own UDC. This request for reconsideration is not intended, nor should it be interpreted, to include a comprehensive list of objections, basis for reconsideration, or grounds for reversal on judicial review. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6535(3), we respectfully reserve the right to supplement and augment this request for reconsideration, and to include additional facts, issues, and arguments in our forthcoming Petition for Judicial Review (assuming the City fails to reconsider its approval and reject the application). Sincerely, Neighbors of Timber Creek Recycling’s Illegal Heavy Industrial Use Please see attached pages for signatures and addresses.] Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 595 of 736 Request forReconsideration -Signature Page Signature Printed ame Address L>ek)·J,·c ALLeCJ 77s: E [olu.tylh, (<a. /'lier,' iv".'D L2L.LJ 5/id r,Ql)nhac( fBs £ LPL&v ,0\?'(.2_ G'11r r::.s1;f\ t-;ac 8@ >,! Ed0 A Ln yvLcld l -o \ } D 7 7 3 t, C oluY11b1a1-d, iv\t:r, °" Ot ··Ly 69a z: N!7fo'a¥dliJndJ{{/1 }i} 00tF, Coll-? JJ1 r" (!Je/,Jo. n µ lo 06 G Lolu.wvkic9.. Rd. NexJ\ruJ-., it L/192 S. Lta11alc /1-t,t #ftntiu1r2?ttt/z 837Cf s .137!< er L1. m;'J,_XD tfs(f{':l_ J1S,7 L/S .J:3c.yff,f;-Lti ,ftl(&,ZcQ (ff .$C1cX?ZI/ J. rSayKr;e_ f#, /!1r:fll.r1Jr IJ> 1'3b<(; S"£Fr S;4TFR ?S?'f 5; lsi?YKER Lill, ftER.I£J.2"4/t£I/J8$ zak-lA S CA.ter g31V S, l3r!Jl<.er l>'"', /li (,r,'),-(J.()J}/)q36L/-J.. 4rk1l.s;-/e1r :,7 </ s Brp h /;; /Jr1:/):,11, -;-;) fs6t/-< 97'°ctf_8/7'f 5, P 1/(£ L/1:: ,41€/(1./J/AI ;_p $.l.6-'f Andree.. Sa.t 637</ S, 6- i0c )j :ro6'36Cf'J Request forReconsideration v,·c Sv.tcr:JUY2.. Rv.ly Or. Nt;·mp7 TD f3 6 AWJ1 e (}xtl /'D5 6 ea (WW) 6u2, 1(0'.( v&rlofIVVV\ I ' , ' 7:JuVit rv1 (}_,> y ( g °"0 6 ,1ri0 Ro. ('()0(L1f).,.r-.i '? 3&<11-.. hl\/\(9,n\0\9 '63 s ::Ja"c\1 ( 4" f0.i,-12 loj\. (.:>\kk:&>?53 .S vL,L E,c'""" \i'Mo 3 s vd{ \'i\o,yJ-.- 3u42...,. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 596 of 736 Request forReconsideration -Signature Page Signature Printed :\ame Address dM /0c.o/e) f3rowvt752f £ LocusfGrbvef,J)_ . J:!f 1 Cr"j 'P. f3ro-JV\7521 S,Le>c-t.<GlGr"veRJ,lfer;c(;a / / 11'l1()c.Jij J1di.uiJ:s -96wr /tl/0 5, t!e.l flfia.,--) f_ Q_jcv / 4 / 0 t; 6-v-tt\X/1 L/t g3 &?, (( 'tl-- l---,)J:C---+-+=:.__-ffoJn 1 Sao h(_7 97? 7 r"fv ,-/1 I:, Lfr/ 1 7JJ,/t!t1 ,, flct 1; Eo(JVl.,(1 q7 S Tl'-fl44,f' D'1 [YlL. /'Wu-i'a.,,_1 7;,<i;-Vz Q]t<, l\rdJ!6llDL 7q¥ ii3"ct6 no,1.c/0\ L. MCI.SD>")7rJS'f /irtv1.iu..1·1,tyln ftendtevl, :Zj) 8-St,,'f<__ l>AVID '£6N ;vt]i ls</6E/)Sr /J1/)l1.<1/I-'( U)/,/6 /J,'!c/l{RJ"A/:Z:O 8'36y_zn / Lb:Yl,i i ?'], 'IC_ z, Mtuj,,clMd V A.,,/ 61«< //,/tu, 17G ;;;, &,k be- RJ 2¥,./ -JC/> 1i3B-t./f';:J j-f_/]-rf-k1£"" [h.q)fr-Hat?7ua dc29/ E f/ufiha?c! Kc/ /((ais U&3'1..,, I Ch l\f\J1'1dt nr e:::.--61 an 710 Columbi IZd :s-12- L.6...L.....kl.-dl 'J3 I=. 1-fbb-J -k_-u.,f\,cc 10 f_ {1\u,A '?cl,. \dtf\!\ r,..., u al'/¥--. -s( _ · t1-11E . i A.,_--rfweku:: fso!£;i!¥o1-?:JJ -5, <£MpH-[O:i,/)M ffl tJJ)( - ---- I '.3(,,'-J;LPsrfuq \.v-1 Joo 5. U:J<:..»vSf-6ro ,d, (L/\ fttJO Y th,@,." s.I :¥Jo e, YJtid/ou1 u." 1 f0-e3 b £ '' JoHoM1J rf/o8Yr'a/17)fy L,Jr {Ye;,, , We(;._ Amie, WrU:s, 'S':1 JJ, Qrd.uivd&e-y p t:,a-f- L.v r-P. S-5'37 fJ Orchc.rd A \IC, }Sv,Vl!t-1 cib °!S,}[ 6 Request forReconsideration Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 597 of 736 Request for Reconsideration -Signature Page Printed Name Address Request forReconsideration Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 598 of 736 Ro :J:L.L: i_,3D b · l-f.\ \.C..b u_ l:-hl- Yl,.1p,y i5--9 '6 G L-\7- t.1\o-.tc. -e..t:S o3lp L ·\\ Jz A. \'1> lofd A,u&lt i235qe. UoLWTeAlL De /LLtflJJl A JJI 1]J 8c&rz__ Abu z-3 t:. #,,,f 1 /)a IW;f/M I fJUt/A Request for Reconsideration Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 599 of 736 Request for Reconsideration Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 600 of 736 Request for Reconsideration Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 601 of 736 Request for Reconsideration - Pg. 1 December 18, 2018 Mayor Tammy de Weerd Joe Borton, Council President Luke Cavener, Council Vice President Anne Little Roberts, Council Member Ty Palmer, Council Member Treg Bernt, Council Member Genesis Milam, Council Member c/o: C. Jay Coles, City Clerk; Chris Johnson, Deputy City Clerk) Sent via email: cjcoles@meridiancity.org; cjohnson@meridiancity.org. Re: Timber Creek Recycling, Application No. H-2018-0042; Request for Reconsideration. Dear Mayor de Weerd, Council President Borton, Council Vice President Cavener, and Members of the City Council: Please include the attached signature pages with the Request for Reconsideration of Application No. H-2018-0042, which was filed yesterday (December 17, 2018) by the neighbors. Also, please provide notice to these neighbors of the City Council Meeting at which the Request for Reconsideration will be considered. Please contact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Joshua J. Leonard Attorney at Law cc: Bill Nary, City Attorney, sent via email: bnary@meridiancity.org Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 602 of 736 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 603 of 736 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 604 of 736 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 605 of 736 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 606 of 736 Request for Reconsideration - Pg. 1 December 18, 2018 Mayor Tammy de Weerd Joe Borton, Council President Luke Cavener, Council Vice President Anne Little Roberts, Council Member Ty Palmer, Council Member Treg Bernt, Council Member Genesis Milam, Council Member c/o: C. Jay Coles, City Clerk; Chris Johnson, Deputy City Clerk) Sent via email: cjcoles@meridiancity.org; cjohnson@meridiancity.org. Re: Timber Creek Recycling, Application No. H-2018-0042; Request for Reconsideration. Dear Mayor de Weerd, Council President Borton, Council Vice President Cavener, and Members of the City Council: Please include the attached signature page with the Request for Reconsideration of Application No. H- 2018-0042, which was filed yesterday (December 17, 2018) by the neighbors. Also, please provide notice to these neighbors of the City Council Meeting at which the Request for Reconsideration will be considered. Note: This is the second -and final- addendum of signatures to the Request for Reconsideration.) Please contact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Joshua J. Leonard Attorney at Law cc: Bill Nary, City Attorney, sent via email: bnary@meridiancity.org Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 607 of 736 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 608 of 736 Request for Reconsideration - Signature Page Printed INName Address 9A33 El Li 830 37a(o r - An( --,u5 OILS ,MQzlpior, g344 -j- M(; F PINIV i- LIl4(% 2 t 2.t M by 5 ly-C6\ v i o T3 4 Z Request for Reconsideration p. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 609 of 736 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 6 1 0 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 6 1 1 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 6 1 2 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 6 1 3 o f 7 3 6 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 9 B Project File Number: H-2018-0042 Item Title: Request for Reconsideration for Timber Creek (H-2018- 0042) by Mark Perison Meeting Notes: 60161,1w iv ry y eLA) FI&d1�1'J4 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 9.B . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Request for Reconsideration for T imber C reek (H-2018-0042) by M ark Perison C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Request f or Reconsideration B ackup Material 1/16/2019 A pplicant Response to Request f or Reconsideration B ackup Material 2/5/2019 Minutes from C ouncil re: Conditions of Approval B ackup Material 2/4/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.Coles, C.J ay Approved 1/31/2019 - 2:18 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 617 of 736 M A R K D. P E R I S O N, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O. Box 6575 • Boise ID 83707 • 314 S. 9th Street, Ste. 300 • Boise ID 83702 office 208.331.1200 fax 208.343.5838 website www.markperison.com REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION December 18, 2018 VIA EMAIL: cityclerk@meridiancity.org City of Meridian City Council 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Timber Creek Recycling Application to Amend H-2018-0042 MDS Dear Mayor de Weerd and City Council Members, On behalf of Barbara J. Miller and the principals of Miller Acres, LLC, an affected person as defined by Idaho Code, and pursuant to Title 1, Chapter 7, Section 10 of the Meridian City Code I hereby request reconsideration of the Council’s decision announced September 18, 2018, and finalized on December 4, 2018, approving the request for amendment to a development agreement. The specific reasons for the request to reconsider are as follows: 1. The Council is not permitted by Unified Development Code of the City of Meridian (the “Development Code”) to allow the expansion of a non-conforming use unless “approved subject to a conditional use permit.” Development Code §11- 1B-1. 2. The Council is permitted to allow an extension of a non-conforming use to occupy additional land “only through the approval of a conditional use permit.” Development Code §11-1B-4.A.2. 3. The existing and proposed uses under the application are industrial uses as defined by the Development Code §11-1A-1 and as determined by the City’s Planning Director. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 618 of 736 CITY OF MERIDIAN DECEMBER 18, 2018 PAGE 2 P.O. Box 6575 • Boise ID 83707 • 314 S. 9th Street, Ste. 300 • Boise ID 83702 office 208.331.1200 fax 208.343.5838 website www.markperison.com 4. The industrial use of the property in a residentially zoned area is prohibited by Development Code §11-2A-2(C). 5. For the reasons stated in any other request for reconsideration, which are incorporated herein by reference. Thank you. Sincerely, Mark D. Perison MDP/ cc: client Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 619 of 736 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 6 2 0 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 6 2 1 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 6 2 2 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 6 2 3 o f 7 3 6 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 9 C Project File Number: Item Title: Public Hearing for Proposed Vehicle Sharing Program Ordinance and Associated Proposed Fees Meeting Notes: First Reading of Ordinance No. 19-1809: An Ordinance Adding A New Chapter, Chapter 6, To Title 3, Meridian City Code, Regarding Vehicle Sharing Programs; Amending Meridian City Code Section 4-2-2, Regarding Party Responsible For Nuisance; Adding A New Section, Meridian City Code Section 7-1-9, To Title 7, Chapter 1, Meridian City Code, Regarding Electric Power -Assisted Bicycles And Scooters; Adding A New Subsection, Subsection 7-1-9(F), To Meridian City Code Section 7-1-9, Regarding Prohibited Parking; Adopting A Savings Clause; And Providing An Effective Date. I/ I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 9.C. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Public Hearing for P roposed Vehicle Sharing P rogram O rdinance and Associated P roposed F ees C lic k Here to S ign Up to Tes tify at Hearing C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate O rdinance Ordinance 2/1/2019 P roposed F ees B ackup Material 1/31/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/31/2019 - 12:29 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 627 of 736 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 2/5/2019 Hearing Type: Council Item Number: 9-C Project Name: Proposed Vehicle Sharing Ordinance Project No.: Active: ❑ Page 1 of 1 Signature City- I Wish To Sign In Address For Against Neutral Name State -Zip Testify Date/Time Randy 12063 W 2/5/2019 Boise X X Rutland Rockhampton St 8:17:49 AM Go Back To List Export To Excel © 2019 - City of Meridian, Idaho http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=172 2/7/2019 VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS ORDINANCE PAGE 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 19-1809 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, MILAM, PALMER AN ORDINANCE ADDING A NEW CHAPTER, CHAPTER 6, TO TITLE 3, MERIDIAN CITY CODE, REGARDING VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS; AMENDING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 4-2-2, REGARDING PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR NUISANCE; ADDING A NEW SECTION, MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 7-1-9, TO TITLE 7, CHAPTER 1, MERIDIAN CITY CODE, REGARDING ELECTRIC POWER-ASSISTED BICYCLES AND SCOOTERS; ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION, SUBSECTION 7-1-9(F), TO MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 7-1-9, REGARDING PROHIBITED PARKING; ADOPTING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, under Idaho Code section 50-329, and Alpert v. Boise Water Corp. , 118 Idaho 136 (1990) municipalities are duly authorized to establish franchises by ordinance, including franchises for the use of streets and sidewalks within city limits; to establish terms and conditions of such use; and to establish a franchise fee for such use; WHEREAS, Idaho Code section 49-208 authorizes municipalities to establish speed limits for vehicles in public parks, regulate the use of highways by any kind of traffic found to be incompatible with the normal and safe movement of traffic, regulate persons upon toy vehicles, and establish procedures for the removal of vehicles from sidewalks and highways; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian finds that electric power- assisted scooters ( e-scooters) and electric power-assisted bicycles ( e-bikes) are consumer products as described in 15 United State Code section 2085 and/or toy vehicles as referenced in Idaho Code section 49-208(1)(s), and are not motor vehicles as defined in Idaho Code section 49-123(1)(h); WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian seeks by this ordinance to: 1) protect and enhance the safety of the several users of streets and sidewalks in our community, including pedestrians, vehicular traffic, and shared vehicle riders; 2) facilitate micromobility transportation options for residents of and visitors to Meridian; 3) establish clarity in regulation for operators and users of Shared Vehicle Programs, as well as City staff and Meridian citizens; and 4) balance regulatory oversight and economy of staff time and resources; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian finds that the following ordinance is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That a new chapter, Chapter 6, shall be added to Title 3, Meridian City Code, to read as follows. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 628 of 736 VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS ORDINANCE PAGE 2 TITLE 3 BUSINESS AND LICENSE REGULATIONS CHAPTER 6 VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS SECTION 3-6-1: DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this chapter, these terms shall be defined as follows. All times enumerated in this chapter shall refer to Mountain Standard Time. A. BEACON: A Bluetooth transmitter, placed by Operator, which broadcasts parking locations to nearby Shared Vehicles. B. ELECTRIC POWER-ASSISTED BICYCLE or E-BIKE: A vehicle that has two (2) or three (3) tandem wheels, has no floorboard, and is propelled either by human power or with the assistance of an electric motor. E-bikes are consumer products, as defined by 15 U.S.C. section 2085, rather than motor vehicles as defined by Idaho Code section 49- 123(1)(h). C. ELECTRIC POWER-ASSISTED SCOOTER or E-SCOOTER: A vehicle that has two (2) or three (3) tandem wheels, has a floorboard designed to be stood upon when riding , and is propelled either by human power or with the assistance of an electric motor. E-scooters are consumer products, as defined by 15 U.S.C. section 2085, rather than motor vehicles as defined by Idaho Code section 49-123(1)(h). D. FRANCHISED PREMISES: Public streets and sidewalks in the City of Meridian; paved, ground-level surfaces on property owned by the City of Meridian, excluding the Water Department and the Wastewater Reuse Facility; and pathways enumerated in the City of Meridian Pathways Master Plan, to the extent City is duly authorized to convey such franchise under the various instruments establishing such pathways. E. GEOFENCE: A virtual boundary around a geographical area monitored by a global positioning system or radio frequency identification technology, which triggers a response from a shared vehicle when it enters or leaves the geofenced area. Such response may include, but shall not be limited to, decreased maximum speed or inoperability. F. OPERATOR or VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAM OPERATOR: A person who owns, manages, operates, or acts on behalf of a Vehicle Sharing Program. G. PROGRAM or VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAM: The offer for hire or use, by self-service, of one or more shared vehicles. H. RESTRICTED AREA: Any location where shared vehicles may not be parked. I. RIDER: A person riding or using a shared vehicle. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 629 of 736 VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS ORDINANCE PAGE 3 J. SHARED VEHICLE: An e-bike, e-scooter, bicycle, or other vehicle offered by a Vehicle Sharing Program Operator for hire or use by self-service. SECTION 3-6-2: VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAM FRANCHISE: A. Franchise established; consideration. There is hereby created by the City of Meridian a non-exclusive Vehicle Sharing Program franchise for the operation of Vehicle Sharing Programs on Franchised Premises. Franchises shall be granted pursuant to the procedures and subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth in this chapter. In consideration for City’s grant of a franchise under this Chapter, City shall not operate a Vehicle Sharing Program in Meridian. B. Franchise required. It shall be unlawful for any person to conduct a Vehicle Sharing Program unless a valid City of Meridian Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise has been issued as herein provided and said franchise is in full force and effect. The terms, conditions, and privileges of such franchise shall include those set forth in this chapter. To be eligible for a City of Meridian Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise, the Operator shall initially deploy no fewer than one hundred (100) shared vehicles, and no more than three hundred fifty (350) shared vehicles. C. Franchise fee. Upon franchise issuance, Operator shall remit to the City Clerk a nonrefundable franchise fee in the amount of $25,000.00 annually. Half shall be due upon issuance of the Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise, and the other half shall be due on or before July 1 of each year. For new franchisees only, the franchise fee due and owing shall be a prorated amount, less $2,084.00 for each whole month of the calendar year that has passed prior to issuance of the franchise. Franchise fees remitted to the City pursuant to this provision may be invested in costs that may be incurred by the City in relation to Vehicle Sharing Programs, or in needed infrastructure to support Vehicle Sharing Programs including, but not limited to, signage, pathway improvements, pathway maintenance, and pathway repair. D. Initial application for franchise. An initial application for a Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise shall be made to the City Clerk, and shall include a completed application in the form and manner required by the City Clerk, which shall include, but not be limited to: 1. Applicant’s name, telephone number, local address, and corporate addresses. 2. Agent upon whom service of process may be made in the State of Idaho. 3. A description of the Program, including which shared vehicles are to be offered for hire or use, maximum speeds of such shared vehicles, rider rules and restrictions. 4. Date upon which shared vehicles will be offered under the Vehicle Sharing Program. 5. The number of shared vehicles to be initially deployed. 6. The plan and contact information for addressing public safety issues related to the shared vehicles’ operation and/or parking. 7. Contact information for a person available to respond immediately to a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare caused by a shared vehicle. 8. Application fee as set forth in City fee schedule. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 630 of 736 VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS ORDINANCE PAGE 4 9. Proof of an insurance policy, issued by an insurance company franchised to do business in Idaho. Such insurance shall name the City as additional insured, and shall provide that the policy shall not terminate or be canceled prior to the expiration date without thirty (30) days’ advance written notice to the City. Such insurance shall afford minimum limits of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) per person bodily injury, five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) per occurrence bodily injury, and five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) per occurrence property damage. 10. Agreement to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from and against any and all claims, demands, suits, damages, actions, or causes of action, costs and expenses to persons or property, whether public or private, brought against the City, that may arise out of, or be occasioned by, the operation of a Vehicle Sharing Program within Meridian, or any act, omission, or misconduct of the franchisee, or his employees, agents, subcontractors, representatives. arising, arisen, or to arise out of the franchisee’s operations, to the extent that such claims are not attributable to tortious conduct by the City, its officials, its employees, or its agents. Initial franchise applications may be submitted no earlier than 8:00 a.m. on January 2 or, if January 2 falls on a non-business day, 8:00 a.m. on the next business day. In the case of a tie, the applicants shall appear before the City Clerk and the City Attorney, or their designees, within two (2) business days following submission of applications, and the tie shall be determined by a toss of a coin. Within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of a complete application, the City Clerk or designee shall either issue a City of Meridian Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise to the applicant or deny the application. E. Issuance. Where duly issued by the City Clerk, the Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise shall include, on its face: 1. The name(s) of the franchisee; 2. Number of shared vehicles Operator is authorized to deploy; 3. Any conditions of operation that are necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare and mitigate effects of the Program on vehicular traffic, pedestrians, or property; and 4. Franchise expiration date. F. Denial. The City Clerk shall deny an application for a Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise where: 1. Investigation of such application or application materials reveals that provided information is invalid, false, or incomplete; 2. The proposed Program is not being conducted or will not be conducted in accordance with all applicable provisions of law, including, but not limited to, this chapter; 3. The applicant has been convicted of a violation of any provision of this section within the one (1) year preceding the date of submission of the application; 4. The applicant has had a franchise revoked in the one (1) year preceding the date of submission of the application; 5. The applicant has an outstanding balance due and owing to the City of Meridian; 6. The proposed Vehicle Sharing Program will initially deploy fewer than one hundred (100) or more than three hundred fifty (350) shared vehicles; or Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 631 of 736 VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS ORDINANCE PAGE 5 7. Two (2) Vehicle Sharing Program Operators are already franchised in the City of Meridian. G. Revocation. In addition to any and all other applicable civil or criminal penalties, the City Clerk or designee may revoke a City of Meridian Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise where: 1. Any term or condition of the franchise is violated by the Operator or by any employee or person operating or acting under such franchise. 2. In the course of conducting a Vehicle Sharing Program, the Operator or any employee or person operating or acting under such franchise violates a provision of this Chapter or of any other local, State, or Federal law. 3. It is found, after issuance of such franchise, that it was issued pursuant to falsified, inaccurate, or incomplete information on the application therefor. 4. The operation of the Program and/or any component thereof varies materially from the description submitted with the application. 5. The Operator fails to remit all or any portion of the franchise fee. The City Clerk shall notify the franchisee of such revocation in writing, and shall mail such notice to the applicant at the mailing address set forth in the Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise application. Such revocation shall be effective immediately upon mailing by the City Clerk. H. Appeal. Appeal of the City Clerk’s denial or revocation of an application for a Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise, or denial of an application for an increase in the maximum number of shared vehicles offered under the Vehicle Sharing Program, may be made by the applicant within fourteen (14) days of such denial or revocation, except that there shall be no right to appeal a denial on the grounds that the application is incomplete or required application materials or fees were not submitted. Such appeal shall be made in writing, shall state the reasons for such appeal, and shall be delivered to the City Clerk via U.S. mail or in person. Upon receipt of such appeal, the City Clerk shall schedule a public hearing on the appeal at a City Council meeting within thirty (30) days. The City Council’s decision on such appeal shall be a final decision. I. Term. Each Franchise shall expire at 11:59 p.m. on December 31, unless sooner revoked or renewed. J. Renewal. Application for renewal of a Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise may be made to the City Clerk, in the same form and manner as an application for an initial franchise, except that an application for renewal may be submitted no earlier than 8:00 a.m. on December 15 or, if December 15 falls on a non-business day, 8:00 a.m. on the next business day. Renewing franchisees may request authorization to deploy the number of shared vehicles authorized in the previous year. K. Increase in number of shared vehicles. Every thirty (30) days, each Operator may apply for authorization to increase the maximum number of shared vehicles offered under its Vehicle Sharing Program Franchise. Operator may apply for authorization to increase the number of shared vehicles authorized under the Operator’s Vehicle Sharing Program Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 632 of 736 VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS ORDINANCE PAGE 6 Franchise, by any increment, up to a maximum of three hundred fifty (350) shared vehicles. If the number of shared vehicles authorized under the Operator’s Vehicle Sharing Program Franchise is at or above three hundred fifty (350) shared vehicles, Operator may apply for a 20% increase in the maximum number of shared vehicles authorized under the Vehicle Sharing Program Franchise. 1. An application for an increase in the maximum number of shared vehicles offered under a Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise shall be made to the City Clerk, and shall include a completed application form provided by the City Clerk, which form shall include, but not be limited to: a. Applicant’s name, telephone number, local address, and corporate addresses. b. A description of which and how many additional shared vehicles are to be offered for hire or use. c. The plan and contact information for addressing public safety issues related to the additional shared vehicles’ operation and/or parking. d. Application fee as set forth in City fee schedule. e. Operator’s certification that all shared vehicles offered by Operator under its initial Vehicle Sharing Program franchise were used, on average, at least three times per day in the previous month, and data verifying same, except that Operator need not make such showing if the total number of shared vehicles authorized, including the additional shared vehicles requested, equals or is less than three hundred fifty (350) total shared vehicles. 2. Within fourteen (14) days of receipt of a complete application, the City Clerk or designee shall either issue an amended City of Meridian Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise to the applicant or deny the application. The amended franchise shall expire at 11:59 p.m. on December 31, unless sooner revoked or surrendered. 3. The City Clerk shall deny an application for an increase in the maximum number of shared vehicles offered under a Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise where: a. Where applicable, data does not reflect that all shared vehicles offered by Operator under the previous version of the Vehicle Sharing Program franchise were used, on average, at least three times per day in the previous thirty (30) days. b. The Operator has violated a term or condition of the franchise or this chapter, or c. The operation of the Program and/or any component thereof has varied materially from the description submitted with the application. L. Removal of shared vehicles. Upon denial or revocation of an application for a Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise, expiration of the franchise term, or failure to timely remit all or any portion of the franchise fee, Operator shall remove any and all shared vehicles offered for hire or use. No person or entity may offer a shared vehicle for hire or use without a Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise, and City may remove any shared vehicles offered by an unfranchised Operator. M. Limitations. A franchise issued pursuant to this Chapter is only valid for program operation within the public right-of-way within the City of Meridian. Operators and/or riders must obtain permission to use or allow shared vehicles on property other than the public right-of- way, including property owned by private parties, public entities, or by the City of Meridian Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 633 of 736 VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS ORDINANCE PAGE 7 as to parks, pathways, or facilities owned by City. Private property owners and government entities may restrict or prohibit the use of shared vehicles and/or the conduct of a Vehicle Sharing Program on their property. SECTION 3-6-3: VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAM OPERATOR REQUIREMENTS: A. Quarterly data reports. To inform and support public safety and transportation planning efforts, Vehicle Sharing Program Operators shall provide to the City, in the form and manner requested by the Clerk’s Office, a quarterly report of anonymized trip records for each shared vehicle deployed within Meridian, to include, but not be limited to, the following data: trip start date, time, and location; duration; distance; and trip end date, time, and location. B. Shared vehicle specifications. Operators shall ensure that each shared vehicle used under a Vehicle Sharing Program is: 1. Labeled with current contact information for the franchisee and explains the method by which customers can notify the local agent of the franchisee to report safety or maintenance issues. 2. Able to stand upright when parked. 3. Capable of informing riders of the location of designated parking areas. 4. Capable of being remotely disabled. 5. Capable of being located and controlled remotely, by geofencing or other remote technology. 6. In good repair so as not to interfere with or degrade public facilities, operations, systems, or equipment or to present an imminent or foreseeable threat to the safety of riders or the public. C. Hours of operation. Operators shall remove all shared vehicles authorized under a Vehicle Sharing Program between 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. D. Parking. Riders shall park shared vehicles upright. No person shall park a shared vehicle used under a Vehicle Sharing Program: 1. In any vehicular travel lane or bike lane; 2. In a manner or location that reduces the width of the useable area of a public sidewalk or pathway to less than five feet (5’). 3. On a block without sidewalks; 4. In a manner or location that impedes ADA accommodations, including, but not limited to, curb ramps, railings, or signal buttons; 5. In a manner or location that impedes a fire hydrant or other public safety infrastructure; 6. In any on-street parking space; 7. On private property without permission of the owner of the property; or 8. On or in a driveway. E. Timely response; removal by City. Operator shall respond to any request to move, remove, or redistribute shared vehicles; reports of incorrectly parked shared vehicles; or reports of unsafe/inoperable shared vehicles by relocating, re-parking, or removing the shared vehicle(s) at issue within two (2) hours of receiving notice. Operator shall comply within Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 634 of 736 VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS ORDINANCE PAGE 8 twenty-four (24) hours with City’s order to remove all shared vehicles due to denial or revocation of an application for a Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise, expiration of the franchise term, or failure to timely remit all or any portion of the franchise fee or any portion thereof. In the event a shared vehicle is not relocated, re-parked, or removed within the timeframe specified herein; if any shared vehicle is parked in one location for more than seventy-two (72) hours without moving; or in exigent circumstances, such shared vehicle may be removed by City and taken to a City facility for storage at the expense of the Operator. City may charge Operator $250 per shared vehicle removed and stored by City. F. Beacons. If Operator installs Beacons, Operator shall provide to City an electronic interface that allows City to view and suggest locations of Beacons. Operator shall not install a Beacon without the permission of the owner of the real and/or personal property on which the Beacon is installed. G. Shared vehicles in City parks. Use of shared vehicles in City parks shall be subject to the following. 1. Riders shall park shared vehicles upright, at a public bicycle rack or at a parking location identified by a Beacon. 2. Operators shall establish geofences to prohibit shared vehicle use in or on the following areas: a. Playgrounds in regional parks; b. Special use parks; c. Tennis courts; and d. Storey Bark Park. 3. Operators deploying shared vehicles in parks shall park such shared vehicles upright, at a public bicycle rack or at a parking location identified by a Beacon. H. Responsible for nuisance. The Operator shall be presumed to be responsible for any general nuisance created by a shared vehicle where such shared vehicle is left on any portion of a public sidewalk or roadway. The Operator bears the burden of rebutting this presumption. I. Rider information. Vehicle Sharing Program Operators shall inform riders of all regulations regarding the proper use and parking of shared vehicles. Operator shall provide a mechanism by which riders may provide feedback to Operator, including feedback regarding parking areas or damaged shared vehicles. J. Public places. The management and scheduling of parks, pathways, streets, and sidewalks shall at all times be within the sole purview of City and/or, where applicable, the Ada County Highway District (“ACHD”) or Idaho Transportation Department (“ITD”). City shall have the right to condition or the use of, and/or close all or any portion of its property, for any and all purposes and under any and all conditions. At all times, Operator shall be on an equal footing with the general public regarding its use of public property. Operator shall exercise any right granted by its franchise only in accordance with the terms of this Chapter; with any and all applicable laws; and with City, ACHD, and ITD policies. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 635 of 736 VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS ORDINANCE PAGE 9 SECTION 3-6-4: PENALTY: Any person committing an act prohibited by this chapter, or failing to comply with a requirement of this chapter, shall be deemed to have committed an infraction punishable by a penalty of one hundred dollars ($100.00). In addition to such penalty, any person violating, allowing, or causing a violation of any provision of this chapter shall be subject to any and all other applicable administrative, criminal, and/or civil penalties, as set forth in this Chapter or elsewhere in any applicable City, state, or federal law. Each day upon which a violation of this chapter occurs and/or continues may be deemed a separate and distinct violation. SECTION 3-6-5: ENFORCEMENT: Peace officers, code enforcement officers, and/or community service officers shall be empowered to enforce the provisions of this section. Such officers may investigate any use or activity which he or she reasonably believes violates the provisions of this section. If an officer reasonably believes that a provision of this section has been violated, the officer may issue a citation to the person responsible for the violation or to the Vehicle Sharing Program Operator. Such citation shall be served in accordance with the provisions of the Idaho Infraction Rules, which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. That Meridian City Code section 4-2-2 shall be amended to read as follows. SECTION 4-2-2: RESPONSIBLE PARTY: A. Where a nuisance exists upon property that is vacant, abandoned, and/or uninhabited, the owner of record, as reflected on the most recent assessment roll, shall be presumed to be responsible for creating, causing, committing, maintaining, and/or allowing such nuisance. Such owner of record shall be subject to any and all penalties imposed as set forth herein, and shall be responsible for payment of any and all costs incurred in abating the nuisance. The owner of record shall bear the burden of rebutting this presumption. B. Where a general nuisance is created by personal property on any portion of a public sidewalk, the owner of the personal property, if such owner can be identified, shall be presumed to be responsible for creating, causing, committing, maintaining, and/or allowing such nuisance. Section 3. That a new section, Meridian City Code section 7-1-9, shall be added to Title 7, Chapter 1, Meridian City Code, to read as follows. 7-1-9: ELECTRIC POWER-ASSISTED BICYCLES AND SCOOTERS: Riders of e-bikes or e-scooters, as such terms are defined in Title 3, Chapter 6, Meridian City Code, shall comply in all respects with the following provisions. 1. Rider s shall yield to pedestrians. 2. Rider s shall ride in bike lane s when available. If no bike lane is available: a. On streets which have a speed limit of 25 miles per hour or less, rider s shall ride on the street. b. On streets which have a speed limit of greater than 25 miles per hour or more, rider s may ride on the adjacent sidewalk. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 636 of 736 VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS ORDINANCE PAGE 10 c. On streets which have a speed limit of greater than 45 miles per hour or more, riders shall ride only on the adjacent sidewalk, and shall not ride on the street. 3. Riders riding on a sidewalk must maintain a distance of two feet (2’) from all pedestrians . 4. Riders may not carry any passengers on an e-bike or e-scooter. 5. In City parks, riders shall not ride e-bikes or e-scooters at a speed exceeding eight (8) miles per hour. Section 4. That a new subsection, subsection 7-1-9(F), shall be added to Meridian City Code section 7-1-9, to read as follows. 7-2-2: PROHIBITED PARKING: Except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic, or in compliance with law or the directions of a police officer or official traffic control device, no person shall: * * * F. Park or leave unattended an e-bike or e-scooter, as such terms are defined in Title 3, Chapter 6, Meridian City Code: 1. In any vehicular travel lane or bike lane; 2. In a manner or location that reduces the width of the useable area of a public sidewalk or pathway to less than five feet (5’); 3. On a block without sidewalks; 4. In a manner or location that impedes ADA accommodations, including, but not limited to, curb ramps, railings, or signal buttons; 5. In a manner or location that impedes a fire hydrant or other public safety infrastructure; 6. In any on-street parking space; 7. On private property without a written agreement with the owner of the property; or 8. On or in a driveway. Section 5. That all ordinances, resolutions, orders, or parts thereof or in conflict with this ordinance are hereby voided. Section 6. That this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication pursuant to Idaho Code section 50-329. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this ____ day of ______________, 2019. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this ____ day of ______________, 2019. APPROVED: ATTEST: ______________________________ ______________________________ Tammy de Weerd, Mayor C.Jay Coles, City Clerk Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 637 of 736 VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAMS ORDINANCE PAGE 11 NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A) CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 19-_________ An Ordinance adding a new chapter, Chapter 6, to Title 3, Meridian City Code, regarding Vehicle Sharing Programs; amending Meridian City Code Section 4-2-2, regarding Party Responsible For Nuisance; adding a new section, Meridian City Code section 7-1-9, to Title 7, Chapter 1, Meridian City Code, regarding electric power-assisted bicycles and scooters; adding a new subsection, subsection 7-1-9(F), To Meridian City Code Section 7-1-9, regarding Prohibited Parking; adopting a savings clause; and providing an effective date. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at Meridian City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication. ____________________________________ City of Meridian Mayor and City Council By: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk First Reading: _________________ Adopted after first reading by suspension of the rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-902: YES_______ NO_______ Second Reading: ________________ Third Reading: _________________ STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 19-____________ The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance no. 19-_____ of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A(3). DATED this ______ day of __________________, 2019. ____________________________________ William L.M. Nary, City Attorney Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 638 of 736 LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC TO SUBMIT COMMENTS TO CITY OF MERIDIAN REGARDING PROPOSED VEHICLE SHARING PROGRAM ORDINANCE AND RELATED NEW FEES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at its meeting on Tuesday, February 5, 2019, at 6:00 p.m., regarding a proposed vehicle sharing program ordinance, and a second public hearing on Tuesday, February 12, 2019, at 3:00 p.m., regarding such ordinance and related fees, as set forth below. Both public hearings will be held at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. A copy of the proposed ordinance may be viewed online on the City’s website, http://www.meridiancity.org. Further information about the ordinance and/or the proposed fees may be requested from the Meridian City Clerk via e-mail at cityclerk@meridiancity.org or via phone at 208-888-4433. Written comments may be e-mailed to cityclerk@meridiancity.org or mailed to the Meridian City Clerk’s Office, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. You may also appear at a City Council meeting(s) to submit verbal or written comments in person. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at the hearing; verbal testimony may be limited to three (3) minutes per person. For auditory, visual, or language accommodations, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 208-888-4433. Proposed new fees: Proposed Fee Amount Application fee for Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise (New) $60.00 + $42 Application fee for Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise (Renewing) $60.00 Application fee for increase in shared vehicles $30.00 Franchise fee for Vehicle Sharing Program Operator Franchise $25,000.00 Shared Vehicle removal and storage fee $250.00 C.JAY COLES, CITY CLERK PUBLISH on February 1, 2019. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 639 of 736 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting February 5, 2019 Preliminary Plat Landscape Plan Conceptual Elevations Elevations Approved with DA Proposed Elevation Submitted with Application Revisions to Elevations After Staff Report Item #9D: Warrick Subdivision (H-2018-0115) Application(s):  Annexation & Zoning  Preliminary Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 36.22 acres of land, zoned RUT in Ada County, located on the south side of E. Amity Rd., just west of S. Eagle Rd. History: None Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: LDR (3 or fewer units/acre) Summary of Request: This project was heard by the City Council on January 2nd. At that meeting, the Council voted to continue the public hearing to tonight’s meeting in order for the Applicant to revise the preliminary plat to reduce the number of building lots from 130 to 112, resulting in a g ross density of 3.09 dwelling units per acre consistent with the Low Density Residential (LDR) designation (3 or fewer units/acre). The Applicant submitted a revised plat consisting of 125 building lots, 5 fewer than the original plat , resulting in a gross density of 3.45 units/acre, which still requires Council approval of a “step” up in density to MDR (3 -8 units/acre). Attached units are no longer proposed resulting in solely detached units range in size from 1,350 -4,000 square feet. A children’s play structure has also been added as an additional amenity for the development. Written Testimony since the last hearing: Bill Prolsdorfer, Elise Poulson, Lisa Nomura, Susan Karnes, Susanna Bohlman – In support of Council’s direction to the Applicant to reduce lots; against requested step up in density to allow more than 3 units/acre. David Palumbo – Belief that the City is in violation of State Code (67-65) pertaining to noticing farther than 300’ of the project boundary for projects that substantially impact a greater area. Steven & Kathy Stark – concern pertaining to construction of the subdivision improvements increasing the floodplain on their property; requesting the Applicant’s commitments at the last hearing to replace the culvert on Amity Rd. and the culvert downstream to reduce the floodplain to the banks of the Ten Mile Creek be memorialized as conditions of approval for the development. Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2018-0115, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of February 5, 2019: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2018-0115, as presented during the hearing on February 5, 2019, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2018-0115 to the hearing date of February 5, 2019 for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #9E: Alicia Court Subdivision (H-2018-0107) Application(s): Preliminary Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 3.084 acres of land, zoned R-4, located at 4036 E. Granger Avenue. History: The property was annexed and pre-platted in 2003 with the final plat being approved in 2006 as part of the Redfeather Estates development. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: MDR Summary of Request: The applicant proposes to develop the site with 6 single-family residential lots and 2 common lots. The gross density of the proposed plat is 1.94 d.u. per acre with a net density of 2.3 d.u. per acre, which falls below the target density of the MDR designation. The applicant is request a “step down” in density from Council as allowed in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed plat is consistent with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-5 for the R-4 district. There is an existing home and accessory structure that are to remain as part of this project; located on the proposed Lot 1, Block 1. Access to the site is from the extension of W. Alicia Street; via a common driveway to access five (5) of the six (6) lots. The existing home on Lot 1, Block 1 is requesting a Council waiver to keep direct access to E. Granger Avenue. If waiver is not approved, the applicant will need to redesign their plat to provide local street access to Lot 1, Block 1. With the extension of the utilities to this property, the applicant is proposing a pathway/maintenance road from E. Granger Avenue to the common driveway that is proposed for the project. The maintenance road will serve dual purposes: 1) allow the City to perform maintenance of the utility mains within the proposed 30 foot utility easement and 2) provide a pedestrian connection to the west. The UDC requires a 20 foot landscape buffer along E. Granger Avenue. There is an existing landscape buffer that was installed with the Redfeather Estates No. 2. The 20 foot landscape buffer was placed in an easement with the approval of the Redfeather Estates No. 2. UDC 11-3B-7 requires that all street landscape buffers be placed in a common lot that is owned and maintained by the home owner’s association. There is existing fencing along the frontage of E. Granger Avenue that is proposed to remain as part of the development. UDC 11-3A-7 requires that the fencing be located outside of the 20 foot easement. The provided landscape plan shows a portion of the existing fencing within 10 feet of the existing property line. The applicant shall move the fencing outside of the recorded landscape easement as show on the recorded plat for Redfeather Estates No.2 or apply and receive approval for alternative compliance to vary from the standards set forth in the UDC. The applicant provided a sample of elevations prosed for the development. The homes consist of a mix of materials including stone, stucco, lap siding and architectural shingles and provide visual interest on the elevations provided. The applicant should ensure that the elevations that face E. Granger Avenue provide architectural interest and modulation. Commission Recommendation: Approval Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Penelope Constantikes ii. In opposition: iii. Commenting: iv. Written testimony: v. Key Issue(s): Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. Realignment of the pathway/utility common lot ii. Construction material (decomposed granite vs. asphalt) for the pathway/maintenance road. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. Struck site specific condition of approval 1.a. ii. Modify site specific condition of approval 1.b. to allow the pathway common lot to remain in the location as proposed by the applicant (see Exhibit VII.D.). iii. Site specific condition of approval 1.g., Commission recommended the Council grant the access waiver to allow the existing home on Lot 1, Block 1 to continue taking access from E. Granger Ave. iv. Site specific condition of approval 1.h., Commission supported the request for the step down in density. v. Modify site specific condition of approval 2.b. to allow the maintenance road/pathway to be constructed of decomposed granite instead of asphalt. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. Approve the request of the step down in density from MDR to LDR. ii. Allow the existing home on Lot 1, Block 1 to continue to access E. Granger Ave. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Penelope – Applicant’s representative in agreement with the Commission Recs. Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2018-0107, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of February 5, 2019: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2018-0107, as presented during the hearing on February 5, 2019, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2018-0107 to the hearing date of February 5, 2019 for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #9F: Bainbridge Franklin (H-2018-0057) Application(s): Annexation Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 3.68 acres of land, zoned R-1, located at 2075 and 2155 W. Franklin Road. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Mixed-use Commercial Summary of Request: The applicant proposes to annex the site with a C-G zoning district which is an appropriate zoning district for an MU-COM designated area. The site is currently operating with a developed with several single family residence with on operating a small engine repair business. A recommended provision of the annexation is that the residential and business cease upon annexation. MU-COM designated areas are intended for the development of a mix of office, retail, recreational, employment and other miscellaneous uses, with supporting multi-family or single-family attached residential uses. Traditional neighborhood design concepts with a strong pedestrian-oriented focus are essential. Development should exhibit quality building and site design and an attractive pedestrian environment with a strong street character. An overall target density of 8-12 dwelling units (d.u.) per (/) acre is desired, with higher densities allowed in individual projects. A conceptual site plan was submitted that depicts 5 commercial pad sites, including a mix of single, two and three story buildings with a similar design theme, various square footages (range 4,300 to 29,250 sq.ft.), open plaza area, an access to Franklin Road, and a cross access to the Twleve Oaks multi-family project to the east and the Calnon property to west. The new plan also incorporates the required 25-foot wide street buffer width along Franklin Road in accord with UDC Table 11-2B-3. Future uses may include retail, office and an indoor self-service storage facility. For information purposes, Council should note that cumulative land use changes have occurred in this area of the TMISAP in th vincity of this project which has resulted in an increase in more commercial property and less residential densities than originally evisioned for the area. The most recent being, the Calnon project that was approved in 2015, which changed the Comprehensive Plan designation on the south and west boundaries of this property from Medium-High Density Residential to Mixed Use Commercial. Because the adjacent properties to the west are much larger, staff anticipates a mix of employment, retail and other residential uses developing on in the area. Full compliance with the TMISAP is not required for the development of this property (no residential component) however; specific design elements are required to be complied with to ensure a consistent design theme and quality development complementary to the surrounding developments. Buffer to Residential Use: Because the applicant is requesting to develop the site with commercial uses adjacent to Twelve Oaks multi-family project along the east boundary of this site; a 25-foot wide landscape buffer is required adjacent to the residential use unless the Council grants a reduction of the buffer. The submitted concept plan depicts a 10-foot wide landscape buffer. Staff recommends the applicant install the 25-foot wide landscape buffer unless the council grants the waiver. Staff recommends that the buffer not be reduced less than 10 feet in width as currently shown on the concept plan. Building Elevations: Structures within the proposed development that are visible from the street or abutting properties are required to comply with the design review standards set forth in UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines contained in the Architectural Standards Manual. Further, the property is located within the TMISAP, which has higher design standards. The applicant has provided a color rendering that demonstrates the design theme for the proposed development. Although specific building materials are not identified, all structures constructed in the development should comply with the design elements of the TMISAP. Commission Recommendation: Approval Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Shawn Nickel ii. In opposition: iii. Commenting: iv. Written testimony: v. Key Issue(s): Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. Adequate parking for the site. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: None Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: iii. Allowing a 10-foot landscape buffer along a portion of the east boundary/abutting the proposed indoor storage facility. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Shawn Nickel – Applicant’s Representative Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2018-0057, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of February 5, 2019: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2018-0057, as presented during the hearing on February 5, 2019, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2018-0057 to the hearing date of February 5, 2019 for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #9G: Cope Collision (H-2019-0002) Application(s):  Development Agreement Modification Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 1.73 acres of land, zoned I-L, located at 1724 E. Franklin Rd. History: In 2017 this property was rezoned from I-L to C-G, a comprehensive plan map amendment was also processed to change the land use designation from commercial to industrial. The recorded DA requires compliance with commercial design standards in the ASM. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Industrial Summary of Request: The applicant requests a modification to the existing development agreement to revise the building elevations from those approved with the original agreement. The original elevations included steel panels with extensive glass storefront and overhead doors. The applicant is requesting a modification to replace the northern glass storefront component with stucco and glass roll-up doors to access vehicle bays on the west side of the site. The originally proposed elevations do not comply with a couple of standards found in the Architectural Standards Manual for Commercial Districts. Specifically, the ASM requires that buildings include banding along the base of buildings to provide a visual anchor; and the use of at least two field materials on facades. Staff included conditions regarding the areas requiring revision in the staff report and the applicant has since provided revised elevations. The revised elevations are more in-line with the ASM requirements for commercial districts. The revisions do provide banding around the base of the building which was one of staff’s conditions. However, staff is still recommending that an additional field material be added to the building elevation. The applicant has provided two different colors of gray stucco - staff would like to see a greater variation in color, additional score lines or some variation in texture to help create even more compliance with the ASM. Staff would like more information regarding the dimensions of modulation and articulation and recommends that the applicant provide further detail with the CZC and DES application. Staff recommends approval of this project with the conditions in the staff report. Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2019-0002, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of February 5, 2019: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2019-0002, as presented during the hearing on February 5, 2019, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2019-0002 to the hearing date of [date] for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 9 D Project File Number: H-2018-0115 Item Title: Public Hearing Continued from January 2, 2019 for Warrick Subdivision (H-2018-0115) by Schultz Development, Located at 2445 E. Amity Rd. 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 36.22 acres of land with an R-4 (19.94 acres) and R- 8 (16.28 acres) zoning districts; and 2. Request: a Preliminary Plat consisting of 125 building lots and 19 common lots on 36.22 acres of land Meeting Notes: G4 ✓C-11\lelr - //O � 0'( to /V/ - /-'0 9 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 9.D. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Public Hearing Continued from J anuary 2, 2019 for Warrick S ubdivision (H- 2018-0115) by Schultz Development, L ocated at 2445 E . Amity Rd. C lic k Here for Applic ation Materials C lic k Here to S ign Up to Tes tify at Hearing C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate S taff Memo 1-29-19 Cover Memo 1/30/2019 Minutes from C ity C ouncil 01-02-19 B ackup Material 2/1/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 2/1/2019 - 8:21 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 640 of 736 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 2/5/2019 Hearing Type: Council Item Number: 9-D Project Name: Warrick Subdivision Project No.: H-2018-0115 Active: ❑ Page 1 of 5 http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=152 2/7/2019 I WishSign Signature City -State- In Address For Against Neutral To Name Zip Date/Time Testify 2/5/2019 Allyson Meridian, Id 5175 S Marsala Way X 9:56:40 Gozart g3642 AM Marsala 2/5/2019 Angela Way, X 10:00:38 Aristo Meridian AM 83642 2/5/2019 Meridian ID John May 5039 S Marsala Way X 10:03:50 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Stephanie Meridian ID 5039 S Marsala Way X 10:04:31 May y g3642 AM Matthew Pond... 2/5/2019 meridian 2069 E Mores Trail Rd Meridian X 10:17:12 southern AM rim coalition 2/5/2019 Deborah 493 E. Shafer View Meridian X 10:19:15 Boyd AM http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=152 2/7/2019 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Page 2 of 5 http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=152 2/7/2019 2/5/2019 Andrew Meridian, ID 2200 E Mores Trail Dr X 10:24:36 Jensen 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Greta 2200 E. Mores Trail Dr. Meridian X 10:25:03 Jensen AM 2/5/2019 William Meridian, ID 5008 S Twilight Mist Way X 10:29:31 Prolsdorfer 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Stephanie Meridian, ID E Shady Glade Dr. X 10:29:55 Johnson 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Molly jolley X 10:30:50 AM 2/5/2019 Lisa Meridian, Id 5008 S Twilight Mist Way X 10:31:05 Nomura 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Meridian ID Paul Aristo Marsala way X 10:33:53 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Jeremy 5454 South Treston ID X 10:36:37 Crowfoot Creek Way AM 2/5/2019 Bridgette Meridian,ID 2547 E Lachlan X 10:36:45 Garidel 83742 AM 2/5/2019 Rachel Meridian, ID 5172 S Twilight Mist Way X 10:39:50 Troughton 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Kim Meridian, ID Kimberly.mey@gmail.com X 10:47:51 Lutterloh 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Lani Meridian, ID 5662 S Graphite Way X 10:50:29 Wageman 83642 AM http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=152 2/7/2019 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Page 3 of 5 http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=152 2/7/2019 2/5/2019 Margaret Meridian, ID 2206 E Lodge Trail Ct X 11:06:07 Hopkins 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Carol Meridian, ID 2250 E Lodge Trail Court X 11:07:43 Nickel 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Bridgett Meridian, ID 2115 E Lodge Trail Ct X 11:09:33 Belokas 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Judith Meridian 2018 E Lodge Trail Dr X 11:13:38 Atkinson Idaho 83642 AM Rosalie & 2/5/2019 Meridian, ID Matt 2279 E Mores Trail Drive X 11:19:02 83642 Skefich AM 2/5/2019 Michelle Meridian, ID 2255 E. Lodge Trail Ct X 11:19:08 McUmber 83642 AM 2/5/2019 John Meridian, ID 2003 E Mores Trail Drive X 11:32:15 Aguilera 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Rachel Meridian, 2227 E Mores Trail Drive X 11:58:36 Cooks Idaho 83642 AM 2/5/2019 Duanne Meridian, 3675 E Woodville Dr X 12:33:13 Bohne Idaho 83642 PM 2/5/2019 Keri Meridian, ID Whitebark Subdivision X 12:33:23 Eberhard 83642 PM 2/5/2019 Barbara Meridian, 3675 E Woodville Dr. X 12:36:19 Bohne Idaho,83642 PM 2/5/2019 Meridian ID Eric Schey 2091 a Mores Trail dr. X 1:31:02 83642 PM http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=152 2/7/2019 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Page 4 of 5 http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=152 2/7/2019 2/5/2019 Jacquelyn Meridian ID 2091 a Mores Trail dr X 1:31:57 Sche y 83642 PM 2/5/2019 James Meridian, ID 5186 S Marsala Way X 1:49:20 Ca ell p 83642 PM 2/5/2019 Bobbie Bj_gregory@yahoo.com Meridian, ID X 2:00:00 Gregory PM 2/5/2019 Luke Meridian, ID bj_gregory@yahoo.com X 2:00:40 Gregory g ry 83642 PM 2/5/2019 Robert Meridian, ID 2227 E Mores Trail Drive X 3:08:36 Cooks 83643 PM 2/5/2019 Troy Meridian, ID 4925 S Marsala Way X 3:29:21 Rawlings 83642 PM 2/5/2019 Stacey Meridian, ID 4925 S Marsala Way X 3:31:16 Rawlings 83642 PM 2/5/2019 Gerald Meridian ID 5374 S Genoard Way X 3:37:07 Shoemaker 83642 PM 2/5/2019 Christine Meridian, 2373 East Taconic X 4:33:23 Herwy Idaho 83642 PM 2/5/2019 Matt Meridian, ID White bark subdivision X 4:38:39 Eberhard 83642 PM 2/5/2019 Stacy Meridian, ID 2257 E Mores Trail Dr. X 4:59:56 Beason 83642 PM 2/5/2019 Terra Meridian, ID 5737 S Graphite Way X 5:08:59 Inman 83642 PM http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=152 2/7/2019 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Page 5 of 5 Laddie and 2/5/2019 Meridian, ID Andrea 5866 S Graphite Way X 5:13:34 83642 Tlucek PM 2/5/2019 Sally Meridian, ID 1166 W Bacall X 5:28:14 Reynolds 83646 PM 2/5/2019 Meridian Kelsy Lyon Sky Mesa Subdivision X 5:53:23 Idaho 83642 PM 2 /5/2019 Meridian Keri Rock White bark Subdivision X 5:55:00 Idaho PM 2/5/2019 Susan Meridian 5556 S Graphite Way X X 6:02:37 Karnes 83642 PM 2/5/2019 Nichole 83642 X 6:58:28 Claiborn PM Go Back To List I Export To Excel © 2019 - City of Meridian, Idaho http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=152 2/7/2019 Hillsdale Elementary Capacity: 650 students Enrollment: 788 February 2019: 51h grade class size of 40 students Idaho's average class size: 25* *National Center for Education Statistics, the primary federal entity for gathering and analyzing data. Research and experts state optimum class size should be: 18 for grades K-3 22 for grades 4-8 25 for high school. Why does it matter? Reading and math scores are significantly higher for students in small classes -even over students in medium sized classes. Sources. Center for Public Education Brookings Institute Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley National Council of Teachers of English 891 New Homes in Vicinity (Most yet to be built or under construction) Subdivision Rooftops Century Farm (numerous phases): 44 34 29 62 68 55 East Ridge 140 Golden Grove: 67 The Keep 59 Paisley Meadows 29 Sky Mesa 278 White Bark 26 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 9 E Project File Number: H-2018-0107 Item Title: Public Hearing Continued from January 22, 2019 for Alicia Court Subdivision (H-2018-0107) by Riley Planning Services, Located 4036 E. Granger Ave. 1. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 6 building lots and 2 common lots on 3.084 acres of land in an R-4 zoning district Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 9.E . Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Public Hearing Continued from J anuary 22, 2019 for Alicia Court S ubdivision (H-2018-0107) by Riley Planning S ervices, L ocated 4036 E . Granger Ave. C lick H ere for Application M aterials C lic k Here to S ign Up to Tes tify at Hearing C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate S taff Report S taff Report 2/1/2019 Minutes from Planning and Z oning Commission B ackup Material 1/17/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 2/1/2019 - 8:02 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 661 of 736 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 2/5/2019 Hearing Type: Council Item Number: 9-E Project Name: Alicia Court Subdivision Project No.: H-2018-0107 Active: ❑ Page 1 of 1 Signature I Wish To Sign In Address City -State -Zip For Against Neutral Name Testify Date/Time Sally 1166W Meridian, ID 2/5/2019 X Reynolds Bacall St 83646 5:31:40 PM Go Back To List Export To Excel © 2019 - City of Meridian, Idaho http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=162 2/7/2019 Page 1 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: 2/5/2019 TO: City Council FROM: Josh Beach, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager, 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2018-0107 ALICIA COURT SUBDIVISION PROPERTY LOCATION: 4036 E. Granger Avenue I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant, Riley Planning Services, has submitted an application for a preliminary plat consisting of 6 single-family building lots and 2 common lots on 3.084 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district; II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Page Acreage 3.08 Future Land Use Designation MDR (Medium-Density Residential) Existing Land Use Single-family home Proposed Land Use(s) Multiple single-family dwellings Current Zoning R-4 (Medium Low-Density Residential) Proposed Zoning R-4 (Medium Low-Density Residential) Lots (# and type; bldg/common) 6 single-family, 2 common Phasing plan (# of phases) Single Phase Number of Residential Units (type of units) 6 single-family units Density (gross & net) 2.277 net density Open Space (acres, total [%] / buffer / qualified) None required Amenities None required Physical Features (waterways, hazards, flood plain, hillside) None Neighborhood meeting date; # of attendees: July 12, 2018 with 7 people in attendance Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 662 of 736 Page 2 Description Details Page History (previous approvals) Annexed into the city in 2003 as part of Redfeather Estates Subdivision No. 2 (AZ-03-021; PP-03-024; FP-06-041) B. Community Metrics Description Details Page Ada County Highway District  Staff report (yes/no) Yes 11  Requires ACHD Commission Action (yes/no) No Access (Arterial/Collectors/State Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) One access to W. Alicia Street, a local roadway 4 Traffic Level of Service Cloverdale Road – F, Granger Avenue – better than D 11 Stub Street/Interconnectivity/Cross Access None Existing Road Network NA Existing Arterial Sidewalks / Buffers NA Proposed Road Improvements ACHD is requiring a public street extension of W. Alicia Street. 11 Fire Service  Distance to Fire Station Not Provided  Fire Response Time 5 minutes 11  Resource Reliability 74%, does not meet the target of 85% 11  Risk Identification 1, meaning current resources would be adequate to supply service. 11  Accessibility Roadway access, traffic 11  Special/resource needs An aerial device will not be required. 11  Water Supply 1000 gallons per minute 11  Other Resources C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 663 of 736 Page 3 Zoning Map Planned Development Map III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant Penelope Riley, Riley Planning Services B. Owner: Wood Family Trust C. Representative: Penelope Riley, Riley Planning Services IV. NOTICING A. Newspaper notification published on: 1/4/2019 B. Radius notice mailed to properties within 300 feet on: 1/7/2019 C. Applicant posted notice on site on: 1/24/2019 D. Nextdoor posting: 1/7/2019 V. STAFF ANALYSIS This property is designated Medium Density Residential (MDR) on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The MDR designation allows smaller lots for residential purposes within City limits. Uses may include single-family homes at densities of 3 to 8 dwelling units (d.u.) per acre. The applicant proposes to develop the site with 6 single-family residential lots and 2 common lots. The gross density of the proposed plat is 1.94 d.u. per acre with a net density of 2.277 d.u. per acre, which falls below the target density of the MDR designation. The applicant will need to request a “step down” in density in order for the proposed development to be compatible with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed density is appropriate for the area and with a request to “step-down” in density, is compatible with adjacent uses and zoning. All adjacent residential uses are zoned R-4, and this would Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 664 of 736 Page 4 be consistent not only with the surrounding neighborhoods, but also with the comprehensive plan. A. Comprehensive Plan Policies: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the proposed use:  “Support a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, medium-high and high-density single- family, multi-family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities.” (3.07.01E) The proposed medium low density development with single-family detached homes will contribute to the variety of housing types in this area. Staff is unaware of how “affordable” the homes will be.  “Restrict private curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets.” (3.06.02D) The existing home on the subject property is proposing to maintain their current access to E. Granger Avenue as part of the development; E. Granger is designated as a residential collector. UDC 11-3A-3 requires that any subdivision provide local street access to any use that currently takes access from a collector or arterial roadway. The applicant will need to request a Council waiver in order to keep the direct access to E. Granger Avenue for Lot 1, Block 1.  “Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City.” (3.01.01F) City services are available and will be extended by the developer to the proposed lots with development of the site in accord with UDC 11-3A-21.  “Require common area in all subdivisions.” (3.07.02F) Because this site is under 5 acres in size, the UDC (11-3G-3) does not require open space to be provided within the development.  “Require pedestrian access in all new development to link subdivisions together and promote neighborhood connectivity.” (3.07.02C) The applicant is providing a pedestrian/access pathway from the common driveway out to E. Granger Avenue. The pedestrian/access pathway shall be placed in a 30 foot common lot.  “Encourage infill development.” (3.01.02B) The proposed subdivision is surrounded by existing residential developments and is the definition of infill development. Utilities exist in adjacent streets, there is a stub street to the parcel, sidewalks exist along E. Granger Avenue, etc. B. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing home and accessory structure that are to remain as part of this project. The existing home and accessory structure will be located on the proposed Lot 1, Block 1. C. Dimensional Standards: Development of the site should be consistent with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-5 for the R-4 district. Staff has reviewed the plat to ensure compliance with the UDC and has determined that it does. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 665 of 736 Page 5 The minimum lot sizes for a parcel in the R-4 district 8,000 square feet with 60 feet of frontage if the parcel fronts on a local street and 30 feet of frontage if the parcel fronts on a common driveway. D. Access: Access to the site is from the extension of W. Alicia Street. The applicant is proposing to construct a common driveway to access five (5) of the six (6) lots. The common driveway is proposed to be large enough to accommodate a fire department turnaround. The existing home on Lot 1, Block 1 will keep their direct access to E. Granger Avenue as part of this project. The applicant is seeking a council waiver to allow the existing home to maintain access in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. If Council does not provide an access waiver for Lot 1, Block 1, the applicant will need to redesign their plat to provide local street access to Lot 1, Block 1. E. Sidewalks/Parkways: The UDC 11-3A-17 requires detached sidewalks along arterial and collector roadways. A detached sidewalk was constructed with the Redfeather Estates No. 2 Subdivision. No new sidewalk will be required as part of this application. F. Pathway/Access Drive: The applicant is proposing a pathway from E. Granger Avenue to the common driveway that is proposed for the project. This pathway will serve a dual purpose; it will provide pedestrian connectivity for the proposed residences and provide an access drive for the City to perform maintenance of the utility mains within the proposed 30 foot utility easement. The proposed pathway has a 90 degree turn in its path and as such will have a blind spot for police and other in ensuring public safety. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant should place the pathway and utilities between Lots 3 and 4 of Block 1. This will eliminate the 90 degree turn in the pathway and as such eliminate the public safety concern. Additionally the common lot should match the utility easement in width. The entire easement should be placed within the common lot. Lastly, the applicant should vegetate the pathway/access drive on both sides with shrubs and ground cover. G. Landscaping UDC 11-2A-5 requires a 20 foot landscape buffer along E. Granger Avenue. There is an existing landscape buffer that was installed with the Redfeather Estates No. 2. The 20 foot landscape buffer was placed in an easement with the approval of the Redfeather Estates No. 2. UDC 11-3B-7 requires that all street landscape buffers be placed in a common lot that is owned and maintained by the home owner’s association. The 20 foot width of the landscape buffer is not maintained across the entire frontage of the property. The applicant will be required to add the necessary width to meet the requirements of UDC 11-2A-5. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 666 of 736 Page 6 As noted above, the applicant is not proposing to make any changes to the existing landscape buffer in width or in planting materials. The applicant shall place the entire 20 foot landscape buffer within a common lot to be owned and maintained by the home owner’s association and shall ensure that the planting materials meet the requirements of UDC 11-3B-7. A previous approval with Redfeather Estates No. 2, allowed the applicant to place the 20 foot landscape buffer along E. Granger in a landscape easement instead of the otherwise required 20 foot common lot. The applicant is requesting that the previous approval be honored and that they not be required to place the landscape buffer in a common lot with this development. H. Qualified Open Space/Site Amenities: UDC 11-3G-2 does not require open space or amenities for developments under 5 acres in size. The applicant is proposing to develop a parcel that is 3.084 acres in size and as such open space and amenities are not required. I. Common Drive: The applicant is proposing a common driveway for the development to provide access for five (5) of the (6) proposed home in the development. The common driveway is extended from a current stub street (Alicia Street) from the east. ACHD in their staff report is requiring the applicant to extend the public street in place of the proposed common driveway, to terminate in a cul-de-sac, and to extend the sidewalk around the cul-de-sac. The applicant shall either revise their plat to meet the requirements of ACHD, or shall receive approval from their commission to keep the plat as proposed. For all common driveways, a perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. With the final plat application, the applicant shall provide an exhibit that shows the setbacks, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures on all common lots. J. Fencing: There is existing fencing along the frontage of E. Granger Avenue that is proposed to remain as part of the development. UDC 11-3A-7 requires that the fencing be located outside of the 20 foot easement in this case. The provided landscape plan shows a portion of the existing fencing within 10 feet of the existing property line. The applicant shall move the fencing outside of the recorded landscape easement as show on the recorded plat for Redfeather Estates No.2 or apply and receive approval for alternative compliance to vary from the standards set forth in the UDC. Additionally, the applicant shall provide fencing along the pathway/access road as provided in UDC 11-3A-7. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 667 of 736 Page 7 K. Utilities: 1. Location of sewer: Sanitary sewer service is available to this property from the existing sanitary sewer main line in the intersection of E. Granger Drive and N. Grenadier Way. 2. Location of water: Domestic water service is available to this property from the existing water main line in N. Grenadier Way. 3. Issues or concerns: None L. Elevations: The provided elevations include a mixture of materials including stone, stucco, lap siding and architectural shingles and provide visual interest on the elevations provided. The applicant should ensure that the elevations that face E. Granger Avenue provide architectural interest. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat with the provisions in Section VIII of this report. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on December 20, 2018. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject PP request. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Penelope Constantikes ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: None iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: i. Realignment of the pathway/utility common lot ii. Construction material (decomposed granite vs. asphalt) for the pathway/maintenance road. d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. Struck site specific condition of approval 1.a. ii. Modify site specific condition of approval 1.b. to allow the pathway common lot to remain in the location as proposed by the applicant (see Exhibit VII.D.). iii. Site specific condition of approval 1.g., Commission recommended the Council grant the access waiver to allow the existing home on Lot 1, Block 1 to continue taking access from E. Granger Ave. iv. Site specific condition of approval 1.h., Commission supported the request for the step down in density. v. Modify site specific condition of approval 2.b. to allow the maintenance road/pathway to be constructed of decomposed granite instead of asphalt. e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 668 of 736 Page 8 i. Approved the request of the step down in density for MDR to LDR. ii. Allow existing home on Lot 1, Block 1 to continue to access E. Granger Ave. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 669 of 736 Page 9 VII. EXHIBITS A. Site Plan Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 670 of 736 Page 10 B. Landscape Plan Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 671 of 736 Page 11 C. Architectural Elevations Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 672 of 736 Page 12 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 673 of 736 Page 13 D. Alicia Court Common Lot Exhibit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 674 of 736 Page 14 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS A. Planning Division Comments/Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. The preliminary plat included in Exhibit A, dated 10/01/2018, shall be revised as follows: a. Place the pathway and utilities between Lots 3 and 4 of Block 1. This will eliminate the 90 degree turn in the pathway and as such eliminate the public safety concern. b. The pathway width shall match the utility easement in width. The entire easement shall be placed within a 30 foot wide common lot. The pathway/common lot shall be constructed per the rendering shown in Exhibit VII.D. c. For all common driveways, a perpetual ingress/egress easement is required to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. d. With the final plat application, the applicant shall provide an exhibit that shows the setbacks, building envelope, and orientation of the lots and structures on all common lots. e. The applicant shall either revise the plat to meet the requirements of ACHD or receive approval from ACHD’s commission to keep Alicia Court as a common driveway as proposed. f. The existing structures (home and accessory structure on Lot 1, Block 1) that are proposed to remain on lots in the subdivision shall comply with the building setback requirements listed in UDC Table 11-2A-5. The garage will serve as an accessory structure to the future home and shall not be used as a residence. g. The applicant shall redesign their plat so that the home on Lot 1, Block 1 takes access from a local street, or they receive a Council waiver to allow the existing home on Lot 1, Block 1, keep the direct access to E. Granger Avenue as proposed. h. The applicant Commission shall supported the request for the “step down” in density in order for the proposed development to be compatible with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. i. Because the rear and/or sides of 2-story homes constructed on lots that abut E. Granger Avenue, a collector street, will be highly visible, these elevations should incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g. projections, recesses, step-backs, pop-outs), bays, banding, porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the adjacent public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. j. Prior to receiving a building permit, the Planning division shall review the building plans for any home that backs up to E. Granger Avenue to verify that there is modulation in the homes. 2. The landscape plan included in Exhibit B, dated 7/20/2018, shall be revised as follows: a. The applicant shall provide a 5 foot wide landscape buffer on either side of the pathway/access drive and shall vegetate it with shrubs and ground cover. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 675 of 736 Page 15 b. The pathway/ access drive shall be paved with asphalt decomposed granite as proposed in order to provide for a pedestrian access as well as an access for the Public Works department. c. The applicant shall provide a 20 foot landscape buffer along the entire frontage of E. Granger Avenue. d. The applicant shall place the entire 20 foot landscape buffer along E. Granger Avenue within a common lot to be owned and maintained by the home owner’s association and shall ensure that the planting materials meet the requirements of UDC 11-3B-7. e. The provided landscape plan shows a portion of the existing fencing within 10 feet of the existing property line. The applicant shall move the fencing outside of the recorded landscape easement as show on the recorded plat for Redfeather Estates No.2 or apply and receive approval for alternative compliance to vary from the standards set forth in the UDC. f. If any of the existing trees on the site are proposed to be removed, the applicant should contact Elroy Huff, City Arborist, at 888-3579 to schedule an appointment to confirm mitigation requirements prior to removal of any trees on the site. Any existing trees proposed to be retained on-site should be noted on the plan. General Conditions of Approval a. Comply with all bulk, use, and development standards of the R-4 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-5. b. Comply with all provisions of 11-3A-3 with regard to access to streets. c. Comply with the provisions for irrigation ditches, laterals, canals and/or drainage courses, as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6. d. Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15, UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28. e. Comply with the sidewalk standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17. f. Install all utilities consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-21 and 11- 3B-5J. g. Construct the required landscape buffers consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C. h. Construct storm water integration facilities that meet the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-11C. i. Comply with all subdivision design and improvement standards as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to cul-de-sacs, alleys, driveways, common driveways, easements, blocks, street buffers, and mailbox placement. j. Protect any existing trees on the subject property that are greater than four-inch caliper and/or mitigate for the loss of such trees as set forth in UDC 11-3B-10. k. Comply with all provisions of UDC 11-3A-3 with regard to maintaining the clear vision triangle. Ongoing Conditions of Approval Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 676 of 736 Page 16 a. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. b. All common open space and site amenities shall be maintained by an owner's association as set forth in UDC 11-3G-3F1. c. The project is subject to all current City of Meridian ordinances. d. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. e. The applicant homeowner’s association shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all pathways. f. The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. g. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11-3A-3. Process Conditions of Approval a. No signs are approved with this application. Prior to installing any signs on the property, the applicant shall submit a sign permit application consistent with the standards in UDC Chapter 3 Article D and receive approval for such signs. b. The applicant shall complete all improvements related to public life, safety, and health as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. A surety agreement may be accepted for other improvements in accord with UDC 11-5C-3C. c. The final plat, and any phase thereof, shall substantially comply with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C2. d. The applicant shall obtain approval for all successive phases of the preliminary plat within two years of the signature of the City Engineer on the previous final plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7B (if applicable). e. The preliminary plat approval shall be null and void if the applicant fails to either 1) obtain the City Engineer signature on a final plat within two years; or, 2) gain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7. f. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Division staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. B. Public Works Department 1. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1.1 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the City's Design Standards. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272 2. General Conditions of Approval 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 677 of 736 Page 17 provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code (MCC), the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 2.10A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 678 of 736 Page 18 2.11All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 2.12Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.19The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.21A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.22The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 679 of 736 Page 19 C. Meridian Fire Department: http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/157208/Page1.aspx D. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ): http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/156945/Page1.aspx E. Idaho Transportation Department (ITD): http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/157287/Page1.aspx F. Ada County Highway District (ACHD): http://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink8/DocView.aspx?id=157770 G. Central District Health Department (CDHD): http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/156404/Page1.aspx H. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District (NMID): http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/157311/Page1.aspx Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 680 of 736 Page 20 IX. FINDINGS Preliminary Plat In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: a. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The Commission finds that the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan in regard to land use; if the applicant complies with the conditions included in this report, the proposed plat should be consistent with the transportation and circulation goals. Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section VII, of the Staff Report for more information. b. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds that public services will be provided to the subject property upon development. (See Exhibit B of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers.) c. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City’s capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the developer at their own cost, the Commission finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. d. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission recommends the Council rely upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc.) to determine this finding. (See Exhibit B for more detail.) e. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The commission is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property that should be brought to the Council’s attention. ACHD and ITD consider road safety issues in their analyses. The Commission recommends that the Council consider any public testimony that may be presented when determining whether or not the proposed subdivision may cause health, safety or environmental problems of which Staff and Commission is unaware. f. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission is not aware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features on this site that need to be preserved. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 681 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 9 F Project File Number: H-2018-0057 Item Title: Public Hearing for Bainbridge Franklin (H-2018-0057) by Steve Bainbridge, Located at 2075 and 2155 W. Franklin Rd. 1. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 3.68 acres of land with a C -G zoning district Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 9.F. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Public Hearing for B ainbridge F ranklin (H-2018-0057) by S teve B ainbridge, L ocated at 2075 and 2155 W. F ranklin Rd. C lic k Here for Applic ation Materials C lic k Here to S ign Up to Tes tify at Hearing C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate S taff Report S taff Report 1/31/2019 Minutes from Planning and Z oning Commission B ackup Material 1/7/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/31/2019 - 2:13 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 693 of 736 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 2/5/2019 Hearing Type: Council Item Number: 9-F Project Name: Bainbridge Franklin Project No.: H-2018-0057 Active: ❑ Page 1 of 1 Signature City -State- I Wish To Sign In Address For Against Neutral Name Zip Testify Date/Time Shawn P O Box 2/5/2019 Eagle g X X Nickel 1595 5:53:29 PM Go Back To List Export To Excel © 2019 - City of Meridian, Idaho http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=158 2/7/2019 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT Hearing Date: February 5, 2019 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Josh Beach, Associate City Planner Bill Parsons, Planning Supervisor (208) 884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: H-2018-0057 – Bainbridge Franklin – AZ NOTE: On November 7, 2018, the City Council remanded this application back to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The applicant requested the remand with hope of gaining a favorable recommendation from the Commission. During the July 12, 2017 hearing, the Commission recommended denial of the application for the following reasons: 1. Continued use of the small equipment repair business; 2. Existing structures remaining on the property for 5 years without connecting to city utilities; 3. Site plan was not revised per staff’s recommendation in the staff report; 4. Staff’s concerns that the conceptual site plan and elevations were not consistent with the MU-Com designation 5. With the number of items above, it appeared the annexation of the property with the C-G district was premature. Since the Commission hearing, the applicant has met with staff to discuss several revisions to the conceptual plans which have been included in Exhibit A. Further, the applicant has received interest from potential users who may develop the property if/when it is annexed into the City. Throughout the staff report, staff has updated the pertinent sections of the report in a strike- through/underline format that reflects the changes in the staff report. 1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant, Steve Bainbridge, has submitted an application for annexation and zoning (AZ) of 3.68 acres of land with a C-G zoning district. 2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed AZ application with the conditions listed in Exhibit B, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Exhibit D. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on January 3, 2019. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ request. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Shawn Nickel ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: None iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Bill Parsons vi. Other staff commenting on application: None Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 694 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 2 b. Key issue(s) of Public Testimony: i. None c. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: i. Adequate parking for the site. d. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. None e. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. Applicant is requesting Council to allow them to construct a 10-foot wide landscape buffer along the east boundary of the proposed storage facility abutting the multi-family development. 3. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2018- 0057 as presented in staff report for the hearing date of February 5, 2019 with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2018-0057 as presented in staff report for the hearing date of February 5, 2019 for the following reasons: (You should state specific reason(s) for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Numbers H-2018-0057 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) 4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS a. Site Address/Location: 2075 and 2155 W. Franklin Road. The site is located in the NE ¼ of Section 14, Township 3N., Range 1W. b. Owner/Applicant: Steve Bainbridge 2576 W. Piazza Drive Meridian, ID 83646 c. Representative: Shawn L. Nickel, SLN Planning P. O. Box 1595 Eagle, ID 83616 d. Applicant's Request: Please see applicant’s narrative for this information. 5. PROCESS FACTS a. The subject application is for annexation and zoning. A public hearing is required before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council on this matter, consistent with Meridian City Code Title 11, Chapter 5. b. Newspaper notifications published on: June 22 November 30, 2018; January 18, 2019 (Council) c. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: June 15 November 27, 2018; January 15, 2019 (Council) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 695 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 3 d. Applicant posted notice on site by: June 29 December 7, 2018; January 24, 2019 (Council) e. Next Door Posted: November 27, 2018; January 15, 2019 (Council) 6. LAND USE a. Existing Land Use(s): The subject property consists of rural residential land; zoned R1 in Ada County. b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning: North: Industrial property, zoned I-L East: Twelve Oaks Villas, zoned C-C and TN-R South: Vacant commercial property, zoned C-C West: Vacant commercial property, Zoned C-C c. History of Previous Actions: None d. Utilities: 1. Public Works: Location of sewer: A sanitary sewer main intended to provide service to the proposed development currently exists adjacent to the parcel in W. Franklin Road. Location of water: A water main intended to provide service to the proposed development currently exists adjacent to the parcel in W. Franklin Road. Reclaimed Water: A reclaimed water intended to provide service to the proposed development currently exists adjacent to the parcel in W. Franklin Road. Issues or concerns: None. e. Physical Features: 1. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: The Vaugh Lateral runs adjacent to the south side of the property. 2. Hazards: Staff is unaware of any hazards that may exist on the site. 3. Flood Plain: This property is not within the floodplain overlay district. 7. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS The subject property is designated Mixed Use – Commercial (MU-COM) on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM). MU-COM designated areas are intended for the development of a mix of office, retail, recreational, employment and other miscellaneous uses, with supporting multi-family or single-family attached residential uses. The horizontal and vertical integration of residential uses is also essential in this area. This designation requires developments to integrate the three major use categories: residential, commercial, and employment. In MU-COM areas, three (3) or more significant uses also tend to be larger scale projects. Traditional neighborhood design concepts with a strong pedestrian-oriented focus are essential. Development should exhibit quality building and site design and an attractive pedestrian environment with a strong street character. An overall target density of 8-12 dwelling units (d.u.) per (/) acre is desired, with higher densities allowed in individual projects. No more than 30% of the ground level development within the MU-C designation should be used for residences. (See pg. 3-9 for more information.) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 696 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 4 The applicant proposes to annex the site with a C-G zoning district which is an appropriate zoning district for an MU-COM designated area. The site is proposed to develop with seven five (75) commercial pad sites. While not necessarily the burden of this application, it should be understood that cumulative changes to this area of the TMISAP have occured, east of Ten Mile Road, west of the subject property.The cumulative changes have resulted in an increase in more commercial property and less residential densities than originally evisioned for the area. The most recent being, the Calnon project that was approved in 2015, which changed the Comprehensive Plan designation on the south and west boundaries of this property from Medium-High Density Residential to Mixed Use Commercial. Because the adjacent property is a much larger parcel, staff anticipates a mix of employment, retail and other residential uses developing on this property. Further, the TM Creek property farther to the west is developing with a mix of commercial and residential uses that also provides services, employment and residential uses in the area. For these reasons, full compliance with the TMISAP is not desired for the development of this property (no residential component) however; specific design elements are required to be complied with to ensure a consistent design theme and quality development complementary to the surrounding developments.The recorded development agreement also requires a more detailed concept plan that demonstrates compliance with the MU-C land use designation. For these reasons, full compliance with the TMISAP is not desied,however; to ensure consistency with adjacent developments, staff recommends that the applicant apply for a development agreement modification with a revised concept plan once an end-user is identified and prior to approval of their first certificate of zoning compliance for the property. This property is part of a larger MU-COM designated area, so staff does envision a mix of uses developing in the area. The properties to the east are the same mixed use commercial designation and with the increased residential uses in the area, additional commercial uses may be required to serve those uses. There is a mix of commercial and residential uses near the intersection of Franklin and Linder Ten Mile and a multi-family development is approved for the parcel immediately to the east of the subject property. Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the proposed development (staff analysis in italics):  “Plan for a variety of commercial and retail opportunities within the Impact Area.” (3.05.01J) With the increase of residential units in the area, the proposed commercial project will contribute to the variety of uses in this part of the city.  “Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City.” (3.01.01F) The proposed development is contiguous to annexed parcels and city services are available. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed use is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the surrounding uses based on the analysis above if the developed in accord with the conditions of approval in this report. 8. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 697 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 5 A. Purpose Statement of Zone: The purpose of the C-G district is to provide for the retail and service needs of the community in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. B. Schedule of Use: Unified Development Code (UDC) Table 11-2B-2 lists the principal permitted, accessory, conditional, and prohibited uses in the C-G zoning district. The proposed commercial development is a principally permitted use in the C-G zoning district. The revised concept plan depicts an indoor storage facility which is listed as a conditional use permit subject to the specific use standards set forth in UDC 11-4-3-34. C. Dimensional Standards: Development of the site shall comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the proposed C-G zoning district. D. Landscaping: Per UDC 11-3B-9, a 25-foot landscape buffer is required adjacent to the multi- family development along the east boundary, unless granted a waiver from Council for a reduced buffer width. Per UDC 11-2B-3 and 11-3B-7, a 25 foot landscape buffer is required along W. Franklin Road. E. Off-Street Parking: As proposed, there is no off-street parking required or proposed for this project. The future development of the site must comply with the parking standards set forth on UDC 11-3C-6B. F. Structure and Site Design Standards: Development of this site must comply with the design standards in accord with UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines listed in the Architectural Standards Manual (ASM). 9. ANALYSIS Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation: 1. AZ: The applicant requests annexation and zoning of 3.68 acres of land with a C-G zoning district, consistent with the MU-COM land use designation. The legal description submitted with the application, included in Exhibit C, shows the boundaries of the property proposed to be annexed. The property is contiguous to land that has been annexed into the City and is within the Area of City Impact boundary. The City may require a development agreement (DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. In order to ensure the site develops as proposed and recommended by staff with this application, staff recommends a DA is required as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Exhibit B. as follows:  Prior to any development occurring on the subject property, the applicant shall modify the development agreement to include a more detailed conceptual development plan for the site that is consistent with the MU-COM land use designation. A mix of uses from each major use category (i.e. commercial, residential, employment) shall be provided as set forth in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP). No more than 30% of the ground level development within the MU-C designation shall be used for residences.  The existing structures shall be removed from the site immediately upon annexation.  Future development of this site shall be consistent with the land use, transportation and design elements contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP) and the design standards in effect at the time of Certificate of Zoning Compliance application.  A cross-access/ingress-egress easement(s) shall be granted to the property to the west (parcel #S1214120710) and to the property to the east (parcel #R8580480020) via a note on the plat and/or a separate recorded agreement prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 698 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 6 City Engineer. Cross-access shall also be granted between future lots within this development as applicable.  Sidewalks shall be provided internally along one side of all major drive aisles for pedestrian connectivity within the development. Further, a 5-foot wide walkway shall be provided on the Conceptual site plan: A conceptual site plan was submitted, included in Exhibit A.2 that depicts seven five (75) commercial pad sites, including a mix of single, two and three story buildings with a similar design theme, open plaza area, and a cross access to the Twleve Oaks multi-family project to the east and the Calnon property to west in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. The new plan also incorporates the required 25-foot wide street buffer width along Franklin Road in accord with UDC Table 11-2B-3. The design of the site should comply with the design review standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the guidelines contained in the Architectural Standards Manual. Staff finds with the addition of the open space element and the mixture in the scale and bulk of the commercial structures, the proposed development is generally consistent with the MU-COM designation. The applicant is also proposing to provide a cross access to the Twleve Oaks multi-family project to the east. Staff is also recommending that the applicant provide a cross-access easement to the west as well. Staff has the following comments on the proposed conceptual plan: 1. The conceptual site plan does not show reflect the required 25 foot buffer along the east boundary of the project. This requirement will impact the layout of the site. 2. The parking located immediately as you enter the parcel from Franklin should be eliminated as to not cause traffic problems with vehicles entering the development. Landscaping: As noted above, a 25-foot wide landscape buffer is required to be installed with the development of the subject property in accord with UDC 11 -2B-3 and UDC 113B-7. A landscape plan was not submitted with this application. There Further, the applicant is requesting to develop the site with commercial uses adjacent to Twelve Oaks multi-family project along the east boundary of this site. Per UDC 11-3B-9, a 25-foot landscape buffer is required adjacent to the residential use unless the Council grants a reduction of the buffer. The submitted concept plan depicts a 10-foot wide landscape buffer. Staff recommends the applicant install the 25-foot wide landscape buffer unless the council grants a waiver to reduce the buffer. If the applicant requests the Council waiver, staff recommends that the buffer not be reduced less than 10 feet in width. to the multi-family project (Twelve Oaks) that is adjacent to the east side of this property; and a 25 foot landscape buffer is required along the Franklin Road frontage. Existing building/uses: All of the existing buildings on the site shall be removed and any existing business located on the property shall cease immediately upon annexation. Parking: Based on the conceptual site plan, there will be approximately 40,60052,850 square feet of commercial space. Per UDC 11-3C-6 one parking space is required per 500 s.f. of gross floor area. In this case, that amounts to 82106 required parking spaces. The conceptual site plan as proposed contains 11596 parking spaces, which is in may be compliance with UDC requirements. NOTE: The self-storage use requires less parking than most commercial uses. The UDC only requires the parking to be based on the size of the office space proposed for the storage use. At this time, staff does not have the specifics of the office square footage to determine if the parking ratio is adequate for the site. However, the required parking will be reduced because a majority of the square footage of the storage (29,250 sq.ft.) building will not be counted towards the required parking calculations. Access: One (1) direct access to W. Franklin Road is proposed for the development. Further Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 699 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 7 Franklin Road accesses should be prohibited in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. As mentioned above, the multi-family project to the east provided cross-access to this site, so this project will be required to reciprocate that cross-access easement. Further, the applicant is proposing to provide cross access with the Calnon property along the west boundary. With the first certificate of zoning compliance application, the applicant should provide a recorded cross access easement that grants access the Twelve Oaks and Calnon properties as depicted on the submitted concept plan. The cross access will provide interconnectivity with the adjacent properties in accord with UDC 11-3A-3increased access in the area. Permitted Uses: In the revised narrative, the applicant has indicated that an indoor self-storage facility and office uses are interested in developing on the property upon annexation. The indoor storage use is a conditional use permit subject to the specific use standards set forth in UDC 11-4- 3-34. The office use that the applicant has identified is a principal permitted use. Because several potential uses are slated for the development, staff no longer believes that certain uses should be restricted from developing on the site and has removed the recommended DA provision from Exhibit B below. Staff feels that limiting the allowable uses on the property is prudent due to the potential for uses that would adversely impact the surrounding residential uses. Staff recommends that only those uses designated as permitted in UDC11-2B-2 be allowed with additional restriction from Arts, entertainment or recreation facility, outdoor, Dispatch center for mobile service, Recreational vehicle park, Vehicle repair minor, Vehicle sales or rental and service, Vehicle washing facility, Wireless communication facility, Wireless communication facility, amateur radio antenna and that drinking establishments be allowed through a conditional use permit. Utilities: Utilities are required to be extended to this site in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. Sanitary sewer service to the proposed development will only be needed for the manager’s office adjacent to N. Ten Mile Road, and therefore no new mainlines will be needed. Though sewer is not required for this portion of the Stor-It facility, water is required. The property to the north was recently approved as a self-storage facility, and with that, staff required that applicant to stub water to the south property line. The applicant will need to coordinate with that property owner and public works to construct water mains to and through the project from the existing mainline in N. Ten Mile Road. Building Elevations: Structures within the proposed development that are visible from the street or abutting properties are required to comply with the design review standards set forth in UDC 11- 3A-19 and the guidelines contained in the Architectural Standards Manual. Further, the property is located within the TMISAP, which has higher design standards. The applicant has provided a color rendering that demonstrates the design theme for the proposed development. Although specific building materials are not identified, all structures constructed in the development should comply with the design elements of the TMISAP. Building materials for the proposed structures appear to be a mixture of stucco and stone with a mixture of roofing styles. Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) and Design Review (DES): A CZC application is required to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant is required to obtain approval of a design review application for the proposed structures and site design for the self- service storage facility. This application may be submitted concurrently with the CZC application. The applicant must comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19, and the guidelines contained in the Architectural Standards Manual and TMISAP. In summary staff finds the proposed project complies with the future land use map and applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the UDC with the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 700 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 8 B. Based on the aforementioned analysis, staff recommends approval of the subject application. 10. EXHIBITS A. Drawings 1. Vicinity Map 2. Conceptual Site Plan (dated: 5/16/201810/29/2018) 3. Proposed Elevations B. Conditions of Approval C. Legal Description and Exhibit Map D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 701 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 20 A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 702 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 21 2. Conceptual Site Plan (NOT APPROVEDREVISED) (dated: 5/16/201810/29/2018) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 703 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 22 3. Proposed Elevations Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 704 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 23 B. Conditions of Approval 1. PLANNING DIVISION 1.1.1 A Development Agreement (DA) is required as a provision of annexation and zoning of this property. Prior to annexation ordinance approval, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of ordinance adoption, and the developer. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance application will not be accepted until the ordinance and development agreement are recorded. Currently, a fee of $303.00 shall be paid by the applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six (6) months of the City Council granting annexation, approved by City Council and recorded. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of the site shall be consistent with the design standards listed in UDC 11- 3A-19; and the guidelines in the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual (or any updated versions thereof) and the TMISAP AND the conceptual site plan in Exhibit A. The proposed development shall consist of a mix of single, two and three story buildings as proposed. b. Any future development of the site must comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. c. Design elements compatible with the matrix on page 3-49 of the TMISAP for the MU-C designated area shall be provided with development as follows: Architecture & Heritage (3- 32); Street-Oriented Design – Commercial & Mixed Use buildings (3-33); Buildings to Scale (3-34); Neighborhood Design (3-36); Building Form and Character – Building Facades, Building Heights (general limit of 4 stories, first floor ceiling heights for retail), Base, Body and Top, Frontage (commercial retail frontage, live/work unit frontage, urban residential frontage in commercial districts), Roofs (flat, pitched) (3-37 thru 3-41); Building Details – Screening of Mechanical Units and Service Areas, Awnings and Canopies (MU-C only) (3- 41 thru 3-45); Signs (3-46); and Public Art (3-47). d. Prior to any development occurring on the subject property, the applicant shall modify the development agreement to include a more detailed conceptual development plan for the site that is consistent with the MU-COM land use designation. ec. All of the existing buildings on the site shall be removed and any existing business located on the property shall cease immediately upon annexation. fd. A cross-access/ingress-egress easement(s) shall be granted to the property to the west (parcel #S1214120710) and to the property to the east (parcel #R8580480020) in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. With the first certificate of zoning compliance application, the applicant shall provide a recorded cross access easement that grants access to the Twelve Oaks and Calnon properties as depicted on the submitted concept plan. ge. A pedestrian access shall be provided to both the parcel to the west and to the east in order to facilitate pedestrian traffic through the area as proposed. h. The only uses allowable within the development are restaurants, retail, office (which include personal and professional services), vertically integrated residential project. if. Future development of this site shall be consistent with the land use, transportation and design elements contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP) and the design standards in effect at the time of Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 705 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 24 g. The applicant shall construct a 25-foot wide landscape buffer along the east boundary of the three story indoor storage building OR obtain a council waiver to construct the 10-foot wide landscape buffer as shown on the conceptual site plan in accord with UDC 11-3B-9. h. Any future indoor self-service storage use on the site must obtain approval of a conditional use permit and comply with the specific use standards set forth in UDC 11-4-3-34. i. Other than the one (1) proposed access to W. Franklin Road, all other access is prohibited in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. 1.1.2 Prior to the City Council hearing, the applicant shall provide an updated landscape plan showing the required 25 foot landscape buffer along Franklin Road. The parking that is currently proposed within the 25 foot are shall be eliminated. 1.1.3 The parking located immediately as you enter the parcel from Franklin shall be eliminated as to not cause traffic problems with vehicles entering the development. 2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2.1 SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 2.1.1 A street light plan will need to be included in the final plat and/or building permit application. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.1.2 Existing domestic wells within the project area must be properly abandoned per General Condition of Approval 2.2.7. 2.1.3 Any existing sanitary sewer and/or water mainline stubs into the subject parcels that are not proposed to be used must be properly abandoned per the City of Meridian Standards. 2.1.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). By entering into a development agreement with the City of Meridian, the applicant agrees to use the City of Meridians recycled water supply as the primary source of irrigation water. Further, the applicant agrees to provide for secondary backup water to provide service when recycled water is not available. Once development plans have been submitted to the city for review, the city will model the recycled water system and make a final determination regarding our ability to supply reclaimed water to the development. If the city can serve the development with recycled water then recycled water must be utilized as the primary source of irrigation water and a secondary or backup source must also be provided. If the city can’t serve the development then the primary source of irrigation water should come from surface water irrigation sources if available. 2.1.5 The applicant shall be responsible to construct the recycled irrigation system in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) recycled water rules and regulations, and Division 1200 of the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications and Drawings to the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction. These requirements do not wave the applicants responsibilities or obligations to irrigation districts that may be able to provide surface water to the development. 2.2 GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 2.2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 706 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 25 2.2.2 Per Meridian City Code (MCC), the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 2.2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian’s standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2” x 11” map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to development plan approval. 2.2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 2.2.6 All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 2.2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 2.2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 2.2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 2.2.11 All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 707 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 26 2.2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.2.18 The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 2.2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.2.20 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 2.2.21 A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 2.2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-221. 3. FIRE DEPARTMENT 3.1 All entrances, internal roads, drive aisles, and alleys shall have a turning radius of 28’ inside and 48’ outside, per International Fire Code Section 503.2.4. 3.2 Buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144mm) or three stories in height shall have at least two means of fire apparatus access for each structure. The access roads shall be placed a distance apart Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 708 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 27 equal to not less than one half of the length of the overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to be served, measured in a straight line as set forth i n International Fire Code Appendix D104.1. 3.3 Commercial and office occupancies will require a fire-flow consistent with International Fire Code Appendix B to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed per Appendix C. 4. POLICE DEPARTMENT 4.1 The Police Department has no concerns related to this application. 5. PARKS DEPARTMENT 5.1 The Parks Department has no concerns related to this application. 6. REPUBLIC SERVICES 6.1 Republic Services has no comment on this application, 7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Access to Franklin Road is approved as a temporary full access, and may be restricted to right- in/right-out at any time , as determined by ACHD . 2. Close both existing driveways from the site onto Franklin Road with vertical curb, gutter and 7- foot wide sidewalk . 3. Consistent with ACHD 's Minor Improvements policy, the applicant should correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated or damaged faciliites on Franklin Road abutting the site. 4. A Traffic Impact Fee will be assessed by ACHD and will be due prior to issuance of a building permit. Please contact the ACHD Planner (see below) for information regarding impact fees . 5. Plans shall be submitted to the ACHD Development Services Department for plans acceptance, and impact fee assessment (if an assessment is applicable). 6. Comply with the Standard Conditions of Approval as stated in the staff report. 8. ITD The Idaho Transportation Department reviewed the referenced annexation and zoning application and has the following comments: 1. This project does not abut the State highway system. 2. Idaho Code 40-1910 does not allow advertising within the right-of-way of any State highway. 3. IDAPA 39.03.60 rules govern advertising along the State highway system. The applicant may contact Justin Pond, Program Manager for lTD's Headquarters Right-of-Way Section at (208) 334- 8832 for more information. 4. lTD does not object to the annexation and zoning of C-G for Bainbridge Franklin Subdivision as presented in the application. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 709 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 28 C. Legal Description and Exhibit Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 710 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 29 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 711 of 736 Bainbridge Franklin – AZ (H-2018-0057) PAGE 30 D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code 1. Annexation & Zoning Findings: Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the Council shall make the following findings: a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; The Commission finds the proposed annexation to C-G is consistent with the proposed MU-COM future land use designation. b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds that the proposed map amendment to the C-G zoning district is consistent with the purpose statement of the commercial districts and the proposed uses will provide a needed service to area residents. c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare if the applicant complies with conditions outlined in this report. However, the Commission recommends that the Council consider any oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this finding. d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school districts; and, The Commission finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. e. The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (UDC 11-5B-3.E). Per the above findings, the Commission finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City if the applicant enters into a DA with the City and develops the property as outlined in Exhibit B above. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 712 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 9 G Project File Number: H-2018-0002 Item Title: Public Hearing for Cope Collision (H-2019-0002) by Mussell Construction, Inc., Located 1724 E. Franklin Rd. 1. Request: Modification to an Existing Development Agreement (DA Inst. No. 2018- 027680) for the purpose of revising the building elevations from those approved in the original agreement Meeting Notes: 707 I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 9.G. Presenter: Estimated Time f or P resentation: Title of I tem - Public Hearing for C ope Collision (H-2019-0002) by M ussell C onstruction, Inc., L ocated 1724 E. F ranklin Rd. C lic k Here for Applic ation Materials C lic k Here to S ign Up to Tes tify at Hearing C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate S taff Report S taff Report 1/30/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate Clerk.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/30/2019 - 12:02 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 719 of 736 City of Meridian - Public Hearing Sign In Form Tools Details and Signatures For Public Hearing Hearing Date: 2/5/2019 Hearing Type: Council Item Number: 9-G Project Name: Cope Collision Project No.: H-2019-0002 Active: ❑ Page 1 of 1 Signature City -State- I Wish To Sign In Address For Against Neutral Name Zip Testify Date/Time Sky Mesa Meridian 2/5/2019 Tyler Lyon y y X Subdivision Idaho 5:54:08 PM Go Back To List Export To Excel © 2019 - City of Meridian, Idaho http://internalapps/SIGNINFORMTOOLS/SignInFormDetails?id=160 2/7/2019 Page 1 HEARING DATE: 2/5/2019 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Stephanie Leonard, Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: H-2019-0002 Cope Collision LOCATION: 1724 E. Franklin Rd., in the SW ¼ of Section 8, Township 3N., Range 1E. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant requests a modification to the existing Development Agreement (DA) to revise the building elevations from those approved with the original agreement. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Description Details Page Acreage 1.73 Future Land Use Designation Industrial Existing Land Use Undeveloped Proposed Land Use(s) Vehicle repair, accessory outdoor storage Current Zoning I-L Physical Features (waterways, hazards, flood plain, hillside) None Neighborhood meeting date; # of attendees: December 17, 2018; 0 attendees History (previous approvals) H-2017-0157, DA Inst. No. 2018-027680; H-2017-0121 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 720 of 736 Page 2 B. Project Area Maps III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant/Owner: Mussell Construction, Inc. 320 11th Avenue South Nampa, Idaho 83651 B. Representative: Network Architects 2517 W. Neff Court Boise, Idaho 83702 Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Planned Development Map Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 721 of 736 Page 3 IV. NOTICING City Council Posting Date Newspaper Notification 1/18/2019 Radius notification mailed to properties within 300 feet 1/15/2019 Public hearing notice sign posted 1/18/2019 Nextdoor posting 1/15/2019 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The development agreement modification proposes to allow the applicant to construct a building differing in appearance from the elevations approved with the existing development agreement [i.e. Inst. #2018-027680, H-2017-0157 Kobe-Cope CPAM and RZ] and enter into a modified development agreement for the proposed development. The original elevations included steel panels with extensive glass storefront and overhead doors. The applicant is requesting a modification to those elevations to replace the northern storefront glass component with a primarily stucco exterior, with glass roll-up doors to access vehicle repair bays on the west side of the site (see Exhibit VII.B). Below, staff has provided some analysis on how the proposed elevations comport to the commercial standards of the Architectural Standards Manual (ASM). It is important to note the elevations as proposed do not meet all of the requirements and further refinement is needed as outlined below. If the elevations are revised as recommended by staff, staff is of the opinion that the proposed elevations no longer need to be referenced as an Exhibit in the amended development agreement. A. Structure and Design Standards (UDC 11-3A-19 | Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the future facility as shown in Exhibit VII.B. Final design of the structure should be consistent with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual for commercial districts per the recorded development agreement. The proposed conceptual elevations for the north and west elevations appear to generally comply with a majority of the design standards in UDC 11-3A-19 and the ASM for commercial districts. Action items that need to be revised or further clarified are detailed below. ASM Action Item #3.2A: requires that at least 30% of applicable facades use a variety of techniques around the base of the building to visually anchor the building to the ground. The submitted conceptual elevations do not appear to meet this goal and shall be revised to comply; the revision shall be submitted with the CZC and DES application. ASM Action Items #5.1B, #5.1D, and #5.1E: action items within Goal 5.10 require that building design incorporate complementary material combinations, including: the use of at least two (2) distinct field materials, colors, or material-color combinations on the building façade; incorporation of an accent material on the first story; and distinguishing field materials from accent materials. The submitted conceptual elevations depict one field material (stucco) in two (2) shades of gray. Staff recommends the applicant provide an additional field material from the basic categories specified in the ASM (wood, masonry, concrete, metal and glazing). Elevations for the south and east façades of the building were not submitted with this application. Scalable elevations for all sides of the building shall be submitted with the CZC and DES application and shall comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the ASM for commercial districts. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 722 of 736 Page 4 Several buildings in the vicinity of the subject property have incorporated multiple field materials mentioned above. The building across N. Nola Rd. (Driven Automotive) incorporates stucco, metal accents and awnings, glass and stone veneer (see Exhibit VII.C). If additional field materials are incorporated as recommended by staff, the proposed building would complement other buildings in the surrounding area. Staff originally recommended the building comply with commercial design standards to establish a cohesive and attractive character for the Franklin corridor. B. Outdoor Storage In accord with UDC 11-3A-14D, outdoor storage of materials, equipment, inventory, and/or supplies shall be incorporated into the overall design of building and site landscaping so that the visual impacts of these functions are fully contained and screened from view of adjacent nonindustrial properties and/or public streets by a solid fence and/or wall with a minimum height of six feet (6’). Such fence and/or wall shall be constructed of complementary or of similar design and materials of the primary structure. A detail of proposed fencing shall be submitted with the CZC and DES application. C. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review A Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) and Design Review (DES) application is required to be submitted and approved prior to submittal of a building permit application. The proposed plans (see Exhibit VII.B) have already been submitted with a CZC and DES application to the Planning Division, however, approval cannot be issued until this subject MDA application is concluded. If Council decides that the proposed elevations should be modified to include an additional field material and banding around the bottom of the building the applicant shall submit revised plans to the Planning Division prior to CZC approval. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed modifications to the Development Agreement in accord with the provisions in Section VIII.A. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 723 of 736 Page 5 VII. EXHIBITS A. Approved Elevations Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 724 of 736 Page 6 B. Proposed Elevations Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 725 of 736 Page 7 C. Driven Automotive Building Façade Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 726 of 736 Page 8 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING 1. Development Agreement Modification 1.1 The existing DA shall be amended to reflect the new provisions and conceptual elevations for the subject property. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: a. 5.1 Owner and/or Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: Development of this site shall substantially comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19; the guidelines contained in the Architectural Standards Manual, the site plan and building elevations in Exhibit A. b. This property is subject to the conditions of approval of the Madden Subdivision (H- 2017-0121) c. All future development of the subject property shall comply with City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. d. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Administrative Design Review applications area required to be submitted to the Planning Division for approval of all future buildings/uses on the site, prior to applying for building permit. e. The applicant shall comply with the accessory outdoor storage standards set forth in UDC 11-3A-14. f. Any structures built on the property shall conform to the commercial standards in the City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual, specifically: i. Building elevations shall incorporate banding around the base of the building in accord with ASM Action Item #3.2A. ii. Building elevations shall incorporate an additional field material from the basic categories as specified in ASM (wood, masonry, concrete, metal and glazing) in accord with ASM Action Items #5.1B, #5.1D, and #5.1E. B. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District (NMID) http://weblink.meridiancity.org/weblink8/0/doc/160515/Page1.aspx Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 727 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 10 A Project File Number: Item Title: Fire Department: PTSD/PTSI Legislation Update and Request for Support [Action Item] Meeting Notes: I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 10.A. Presenter: F ire Chief M ark Niemeyer Estimated Time f or P resentation: 10 minutes Title of I tem - F ire D epartment: P T S D /P T S I L egislation Update and Request for Support [Action Item] Presentation from the Fire Chief on upcoming P T S D/P T S I work comp legislation, followed by question/answer period. C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate Memo to Council Cover Memo 1/14/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate F ire Coles, C.J ay Approved 1/14/2019 - 4:46 P M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 728 of 736 Meridian Fire Department 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite #210 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-888-1234 www.meridiancity.org January 14, 2019 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Members CC: Mark Niemeyer FROM: Meridian Fire Department RE: PTSD Legislation Update Presentation from the Fire Chief on upcoming PTSD/PTSI work comp legislation, followed by question/answer period, with the hope of a resulting position of support from Mayor and City Council. Proposed legislation removes the current requirement for a physical injury required for a PTSD claim to be approved. Legislation is for work comp coverage only to allow for treatment of an employee properly diagnosed with the intention of returning to work. This legislation is NOT presumptive, meaning coverage after employment ends. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 729 of 736 City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 11 A Project File Number: H-2018-0006 Item Title: Ordinance No. 18-17746 Meeting Notes: An Amended Ordinance (H-2018-0006 Fast Eddy's) For Annexation Of A Parcel Of Land Being A Portion Of Lot 2, Block 1 Of Jasmine Acres Subdivision (Book 59 Of Plats At Pages 5,829 Through 5,830, Records Of Ada County, Idaho) And A Portion Of Unplatted Lands, Situated In The Northeast % Of The Southeast % Of Section 32 And The Northwest % Of The Southwest % Of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, As Described In Attachment "A" And Annexing Certain Lands And Territory, Situated In Ada County, Idaho, And Adjacent And Contiguous To The Corporate Limits Of The City Of Meridian As Requested By The City Of Meridian; Establishing And Determining The Land Use Zoning Classification Of 1.50 Acres Of Land From Rut To C -G (General Retail And Service Commercial) Zoning District In The Meridian City Code; Providing That Copies Of This Ordinance Shall Be Filed With The Ada County Assessor, The Ada County Recorder, And The Idaho State Tax Commission, As Required By Law; And Providing For A Summary Of The Ordinance; And Providing For A Waiver Of The Reading Rules; And Providing An Effective Date. I TEM SHEET C ouncil Agenda I tem - 11.A . Presenter: C.J ay C oles Estimated Time f or P resentation: 2 minutes Title of I tem - Ordinance No. 18-1774B : An Amended Ordinance (H-2018-0006 F ast E ddy’s) F or Annexation Of A Parcel Of L and B eing A P ortion Of L ot 2, Block 1 O f J asmine Acres Subdivision (B ook 59 Of P lats At P ages 5,829 T hrough 5,830, Records O f Ada County, Idaho) And A P ortion Of Unplatted L ands, Situated In T he Northeast ¼ O f T he Southeast ¼ Of S ection 32 And T he Northwest ¼ Of T he S outhwest ¼ Of S ection 33, Township 4 North, Range 1 E ast, Boise M eridian, Ada C ounty, Idaho, As Described In Attachment “A” And Annexing C ertain Lands And Territory, Situated In Ada C ounty, Idaho, And Adjacent And C ontiguous To T he Corpor ate L imits Of T he City Of M eridian As Requested B y T he City Of M eridian; Establishing And D etermining T he L and Use Zoning Classification Of 1.50 Acres Of L and F rom Rut To C-G (General Retail And Service C ommercial) Zoning D istrict In T he M eridian City Code; P roviding T hat C opies Of T his Ordinance Shall Be F iled With T he Ada C ounty Assessor, T he Ada C ounty Recorder, And T he Idaho S tate Tax C ommission, As Required B y Law; And Providing F or A Summary Of T he Ordinance; And P roviding F or A Waiver Of T he Reading Rules; And P roviding An E ffective Date. 2nd Amended Ordinance to correct L egal Description C ouncil Notes: AT TAC HM E NT S: Description Type Upload D ate F ast Eddy's - 2nd A mended O rdinance Ordinance 1/23/2019 F ast Eddy's - E xhibit A E xhibit 1/23/2019 F ast Eddy's - E xhibit B E xhibit 1/23/2019 F ast Eddy's - 2nd A mended O rd S ummary Ordinance 1/23/2019 RE V I E WE RS : Department Reviewer Action D ate L egal.J ohnson, Chris Approved 1/24/2019 - 10:05 A M L egal.A lbertson, Michelle Approved 1/24/2019 - 11:08 A M Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 – Page 730 of 736 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2019-009467 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 LISA BATT 02/06/2019 09:05 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 18-1774 B BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, PALMER, LITTLE ROBERTS AN AMENDED ORDINANCE (H-2018-0006— FAST EDDY'S) FOR ANNEXATION OF A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1. OF JASMINE ACRES SUBDIVISION (BOOK 59 OF PLATS AT PAGES 5,829 THROUGH 5,830, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO) AND A PORTION OF UNPLATTED LANDS, SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST'/40F THE SOUTHEAST % OF SECTION 32 AND THE NORTHWEST % OF THE SOUTHWEST '/4 OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT "A" AND ANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS AND TERRITORY, SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; ESTABLISHING AND DETERMINING THE LAND USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 1.50 ACRES OF LAND FROM RUT TO C -G (GENERAL RETAIL AND SERVICE COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR A SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SECTION 1. That the following described land as evidenced by attached Legal Description herein incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A" are within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation and re -zoning by the owner of said property, to -wit: ST Investments, Inc. SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby annexed and re -zoned from RUT to C -G (General Retail and Service Commercial) zoning district in the Meridian City Code. SECTION 3. That the City has authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and zone said property. SECTION 4. That the City has complied with all the noticing requirements pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian to annex and re -zone said property. SECTION 5. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE — FAST EDDY'S (H 2018-0006) Page 1 of 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda February 5, 2019 — Page 731 of 736 SECTION 6. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8. The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner, including the lands herein rezoned, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to -wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho. SECTION 9. That pursuant to the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one (1) of the Members of the full Council, the rule requiring two (2) separate readings by title and one (1) reading in full be, and the same is hereby, dispensed with, and accordingly, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 6-111 day of E 2019. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of V'&Y11aYd 2019. 1� MAYOR Y de WEERD E0 AUG usT 0 ('ity of E MAN W SEAL i AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE — FAST EDDY'S (H 2018-0006) Page 2 of 3 STATE OF IDAHO, ss: County of Ada ) G�l 2019 On this � day of r-ebr1%aN ,t$, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared TAMMY de WEERD and C.JAY COLES, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO CHARLENEMMISSION #67390MY COMMISSION EXPIRES• -a�NOTARY PUBLIC ST M CO:SSION EXPISTATE OF RESg 2j2 AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE — FAST EDDY'S (H 2018-0006) Page 3 of 3 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 7 3 4 o f 7 3 6 M e r i d i a n C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g A g e n d a F e b r u a r y 5 , 2 0 1 9 – P a g e 7 3 5 o f 7 3 6 NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO I.C. § 50-901(A) CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 18-1774 B PROVIDING FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE An Amended Ordinance of the City of Meridian granting annexation of land being a portion of Lot 2, Block 1 of Jasmine Acres Subdivision, (Book 59 of Plats at Page 5,829 through 5,830, records of Ada County, Idaho and a portion of unplatted lands, situated in the Northeast'/4 of the Southeast'/4 of Section 32 and the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise, Ada County, Idaho. This parcel contains 1.50 acres more or less. Also, these parcels are SUBJECT TO all easements and rights-of-way of record or implied. As surveyed in attached exhibit `B" and is not based on an actual field survey. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective on the _�5f) day of February, 2019. / �� ,,c of M i ian i '1�1�No Mayor and ity Council By: C.Jay Coles, City Clerk s�p`ti Ji First Reading: a/ 5-ry�cFN),ER.f o- * Adopted after first re ding by suspension of the Rule as allowed pursuant to Idaho Code §50-902:. YES NO Second Reading: Third Reading: STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY AS TO ADEQUACY OF SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 18-1774B The undersigned, William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that he is the legal advisor of the City and has reviewed a copy of the attached Ordinance No. 18-1774B of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and has found the same to be true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-901A (3). DATED this 541 day of February, 2019. ). V-1. L---� William. L.M. Nary City Attorney 2"d AMENDED ORDINANCE SUMMARY - FAST EDDY'S ANNEXATION (H-2018-0006) City Council Regular Meeting February 5, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 12 Project File Number: Item Title: Future Meeting Topics Meeting Notes: City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Item Number: 13 Project File Number: Item Title: Meeting Notes: February 5, 2019 Executive Session Executive Session per Idaho State Code 74-206(1)(a): To consider hiring a public officer, employee, staff member or individual agent, wherein the respective qualities of individuals are to be evaluated in order to fill a particular vacancy or need. ('Al