Meridian Police DepartmentMeridian Police Department - Oakwind Sub
Location of new development - NE McMillan Road and N McDermott Rd
Time Frame - 01/1/2018-12/31/2018
Level of Service (LoS)- Delivered By Reporting District (RD - M711)
Calls for Service (CFS): Response Times: Dispatch to Arrival
(all units)
Average Response Times by Priority: 'City of Meridian'
Priority 3
4.00
Priority 2
7.52
Priority 1
13.05
Average Response Times by Priority:_'M711'
Priority 3
Not available
Priority 2
Not available
Priority 1
Not available
Calls for Service (CFS): Calls occurring in RD'M711'
CFS Count Total
10
% of Calls for Service split by Priority in 'M711'
• of P3 CFS
10.0%
• of P2 CFS
90.0%
• of P1 CFS
0.0%
• of PO CFS
0.0%
Crimes
Crime Count Total
13
Crashes
*Crash Count:Tota]
1
Analyst Note (s):
Response Time and Calls for Service (CFS) by Priority - Most frequent priority call types;
• Priority 3 calls most frequently involve EMS Assist.
• Priority 2 calls most frequently involve ATL Drunk Driver and Crash Non -Injury.
• Priority 1 calls none received.
Crime - Most frequent crimes involved;
• Drug/Narcotic Violations,
• All Other Offenses (Encouraging YRA and Frequenting Where Drugs are Present), and
• Drug Equipment Violations.
*Crashes - Most frequent crashes were non reportable;
• 100% non reportable crashes.
• 0% injury crashes, and
• 0% property damage reports.
Priority Response Times Defined: Response Time for RD 711 not available due to software error.
Priority 0 type calls are no priority type of calls.
Priority 1 type calls are for non -emergency type of calls where the officer will arrive at the earliest convenience, and
Priority 2 type calls require an urgent response where the officer will arrive as soon as practical, and should obey all
traffic laws.
Priority 3 type calls are an emergency response in which the lights and siren and driving as authorized for an
emergency vehicle by Idaho Code to facilitate the quick and safe arrival of an officer to the scene.
*Some data may be incomplete due to report processing times.
1/9/2019
BME3236 Source: TT CAD, NWRMS, WebCars
D D D P1 P1
DATE: 1/10/2019
TO: Sonya Allen
REVIEWER: Lieutenant Scott Colaianni
SUBJECT: H-2018-0119
PROJECT NAME: Oakwind
POLICE DEPARTMENT SUMMARY OF REPORT:
1. Police Response Time -The Oakwind proposed development is approximately 8.5 miles from the
Meridian Police Department. The expected response time to this area in an emergency is approximately
4-5 minutes. Between 1/1/2018 & 12/31/2018 the Meridian Police responded to 1 crash within a mile area
of the proposed development. Also, during this same timeline the Meridian Police responded to 10 calls
for service within a mile area of the proposed development. The call rate in the proposed area is very low
at this time. (See attached document for details)
2. Accessibility — Access for the Meridian Police Department is not an issue for the proposed
development in this area.
3. Resource needs — There are no additional staffing, equipment needs or other resources needed to serve
the proposed development.
4. Other comments- The Meridian Police Department already services this area. There are no
outstanding issues from the Meridian Police Department
5. COMMENTS MEETING DATE:
Reviewer: ❑ Scott Colaianni ❑ Other
Planner Assigned: ® Sonya Allen ❑ Josh Beach ❑ Bill Parsons
Project Name: Oakwind Sub,
The following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimum levels of police protection for the
proposed project:
6. POLICE DEPARTMENT ITEMS FOR IMMEDIATE FOLLOW-UP (PRIOR TO HEARING)
A. ❑ The proposed development and/or plan do not offer natural surveillance opportunities of the public
areas. Prior to the public hearing, the applicant shall meet with a Police Department designee and/or
Planning Staff to discuss features that increase visibility, including doors and windows that look out on
to the public areas. The plan shall be revised in accord with those discussions.
B. ❑ The proposed multi -family dwellings show more than 4 units that share a common entrance and/or
stairwell. Such configurations are a safety concern. Prior to the next public hearing, the applicant shall
meet with a Police Department designee to address these concerns and revise the plans as necessary.
C. ❑ The proposed drive through has limited visibility from a public street. Prior to the public hearing,
the applicant shall meet with a Police Department designee to discuss methods of increasing visibility
to the facility.
D. ❑ The proposed after-hours walk-up facility (e.g. ATM) has limited visibility from a public street.
Prior to the public hearing, the applicant shall meet with a Police Department designee to discuss
methods of increasing visibility to the facility.
E. ® The Police Department has no concerns related to the site design submitted with the application.
7. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (INCLUDED IN PLANNING DEPT. CONDITIONS)
1. ❑ The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to show walkway paving materials (e.g. pavers,
colored or scored concrete, bricks, etc.) and landscaping materials that better distinguish the
walkway from the vehicular driving surface.
❑ Prior to CZC submittal, the applicant shall work with the Police Department and/or Fire
Marshall to provide patrol capabilities and/or emergency vehicle access to the proposed storage
yards.
3. ❑ The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to show walkway paving (e.g. pavers, colored or
scored concrete, bricks, etc.) and landscaping materials that better define the building entrance and
distinguish the walkways from the driving surfaces.
4. ❑ The applicant shall revise the site and/or landscape plan to create greater visibility of the hiding
spot near [add] from public areas such as a street or parking lot.
5. ❑ The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to limit landscaping along streets, pathways, and
up against structures, to species that do not exceed two feet in height.
6. ❑ The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a
minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the
area.
7. ❑ The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to illuminate all pathways with a four -foot tall
bollard style or similar lighting source. Such lighting shall be shielded from adjoining residences.
8. ❑ Low pressure sodium lighting shall be prohibited as an exterior lighting source on the site.
0 M 0 0 0 M 0 M M 0