Loading...
Meridian PoliceDATE: 11/27/2018 TO: Sonya Watters REVIEWER: Lieutenant Scott Colaianni SUBJECT: H-2018-0115 PROJECT NAME: Warrick Sub POLICE DEPARTMENT SUMMARY OF REPORT: 1. Police Response Time- The proposed development Warrick Sub is approximately 3.5 miles from the Meridian Police Department. The expected response time to this area in an emergency is about 4 minutes. Between 11/1/2017 — 10/31/2018 the Meridian Police Department responded to 412 calls for service within a mile of the proposed development. Most of these calls were related to domestic violations & enticing children, trespassing and residential burglary. During this same time period the Meridian Police Department responded to 0 crashes within a mile of the proposed development. See attached document for additional details on calls. 2. Accessibility — Access for the Meridian Police Department is not an issue for the proposed development in this area. 3. Resource needs — There are no additional staffing, equipment needs or other resources needed to serve the proposed development. 4. Other comments- The Meridian Police Department already serves this growing area. 7. COMMENTS MEETING DATE: Reviewer: ® Scott Colaianni ❑ Other Planner Assigned: ® Sonya Watters ❑ Josh Beach ❑ Bill Parsons Project Name: Warrick Sub The following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimum levels of police protection for the proposed project: 8. POLICE DEPARTMENT ITEMS FOR IMMEDIATE FOLLOW-UP (PRIOR TO HEARING) A. ❑ The proposed development and/or plan do not offer natural surveillance opportunities of the public areas. Prior to the public hearing, the applicant shall meet with a Police Department designee and/or Planning Staff to discuss features that increase visibility, including doors and windows that look out on to the public areas. The plan shall be revised in accord with those discussions. B. ❑ The proposed multi -family dwellings show more than 4 units that share a common entrance and/or stairwell. Such configurations are a safety concern. Prior to the next public hearing, the applicant shall meet with a Police Department designee to address these concerns and revise the plans as necessary. C. ❑ The proposed drive through has limited visibility from a public street. Prior to the public hearing, the applicant shall meet with a Police Department designee to discuss methods of increasing visibility to the facility. D. ❑ The proposed after-hours walk-up facility (e.g. ATM) has limited visibility from a public street. Prior to the public hearing, the applicant shall meet with a Police Department designee to discuss methods of increasing visibility to the facility. E. ® The Police Department has no concerns related to the site design submitted with the application. 9. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (INCLUDED IN PLANNING DEPT. CONDITIONS) ❑ The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to show walkway paving materials (e.g. pavers, colored or scored concrete, bricks, etc.) and landscaping materials that better distinguish the walkway from the vehicular driving surface. 2. ❑ Prior to CZC submittal, the applicant shall work with the Police Department and/or Fire Marshall to provide patrol capabilities and/or emergency vehicle access to the proposed storage yards. 3. ❑ The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to show walkway paving (e.g. pavers, colored or scored concrete, bricks, etc.) and landscaping materials that better define the building entrance and distinguish the walkways from the driving surfaces. 4. ❑ The applicant shall revise the site and/or landscape plan to create greater visibility of the hiding spot near [add] from public areas such as a street or parking lot. 5. ❑ The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to limit landscaping along streets, pathways, and up against structures, to species that do not exceed two feet in height. 6. ❑ The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. 7. ❑ The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to illuminate all pathways with a four -foot tall bollard style or similar lighting source. Such lighting shall be shielded from adjoining residences. 8. ❑ Low pressure sodium lighting shall be prohibited as an exterior lighting source on the site. Meridian Police Department - Warrick Subdivision Location of new development - 2445 E Amith Road Time Frame - 11/1/2017-10/31/2018 Level of Service (LoS)- Delivered By Reporting District (RD - M778) Calls for Service (CFS): Response Times: Dispatch to Arrival (all units) Average Response Times by Priority: 'City of Meridian' Priority 3 3.59 Priority 2 7.59 Priority 1 12.56 Average Response Times by Priority:_'M778' Priority 3 na Priority 2 14.41 Priority 1 21.47 Calls for Service (CFS): Calls occurring in RD'M778' CFS Count Total 412 % of Calls for Service split by Priority in 'M778' • of P3 CFS 0.5% • of P2 CFS 57.5% • of P1 CFS 40.8% • of PO CFS 1.2% Crimes Crime Count Total 8 Crashes *Crash Count:Tota] 0 Analyst Note (s): Response Time and Calls for Service (CFS) by Priority - Most frequent priority call types; • Priority 3 calls most frequently involve Injury Crash, and Hit and Run Injury. • Priority 2 calls most frequently involve Traffic Stop, Suspicous Vehicles, and Residential Burglary Alarm. • Priority 1 calls most frequently involve Citizen Assists, Follow-up, and Fraud Reports. Crime - Most frequent crimes involved; • All Other Offenses (Protection Order Violations and Enticing Children), • Trespass of Property, False Pretenses (Swindling), and • Residential Burglary. *Crashes - Most frequent crashes were; •No reported crashes during this time period. Priority Response Times Defined: Priority 0 type calls are no priority type of calls. Priority 1 type calls are for non -emergency type of calls where the officer will arrive at the earliest convenience, and Priority 2 type calls require an urgent response where the officer will arrive as soon as practical, and should obey all traffic laws. Priority 3 type calls are an emergency response in which the lights and siren and driving as authorized for an emergency vehicle by Idaho Code to facilitate the quick and safe arrival of an officer to the scene. *Some data may be incomplete due to report processing times. 11/21/2018 BME3236 Source: TT CAD, NWRMS, WebCars