ACHDDevelopment Services Department
AO
CHD
Project/File: Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/ H-2018-0107
This is a preliminary plat application consisting of 6 buildable lots and 2 common lots
nn :3-arrP�
Lead Agency:
City of Meridian
Site address:
4036 E. Granger Avenue
Staff Approval:
XXXX, 2018
Applicant:
Penelope Constantikes
R-4
Riley Planning Services
Single Family Residential
PO Box 405
West
Boise, ID 83701
Staff Contact:
Dawn Battles
Phone: 387-6218
E-mail: dbattles(aj�achdidaho.org
A. Findings of Fact
1. Description of Application: The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat consisting
of 6 buildable lots and 2 common lots on 3 acres. The site is zoned R-4 Medium -Low Density
Residential) and is consistent with the City of Meridian's comprehensive plan.
2. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
Direction
Land Use
Zoning
North
Medium -Low Density Residential
R-4
South
Medium -Low Density Residential
R-4
East
Single Family Residential
R-1 C Cit of Boise
West
Medium -Low Density Residential
R-4
3. Site History: ACHD Commission reviewed this site as part of Red Feather Estates #2/ MPP03-
024/MAZ03-02/MCUP03-041 in November 2003. The requirements of this staff report are
consistent with those of the prior action.
4. Transit: Transit services are not available to serve this site.
5. Pathway Crossings: United States Access Board R304.5.1.2 Shared Use Paths. In shared use
paths, the width of curb ramps runs and blended transitions shall be equal to the width of the shared
use path.
AASHTO's Guidelines for the Development of Bicycle Facilities 5.3.5 Other Intersection
Treatments: The opening of a shared use path at the roadway should be at least the same width
as the shared use path itself. If a curb ramp is provided, the ramp should be the full width of the
DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/ H-2018-0107
path, not including any flared sides if utilized.... Detectable warnings should be placed across the
full width of the ramp.
FHWA's "Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access" (1999) reflected common ADA -related
concepts: Chapter 6, Page 16-6: The width of the ramp should be at least as wide as the average
width of the trail to improve safety for users who will be traveling at various speeds. In addition, the
overall width of the trail should be increased, so the curb ramp can be slightly offset to the side. The
increased width reduces conflict at the intersection by providing more space for users at the bottom
of the ramp.
6. New Center Lane Miles: The proposed development includes 0 centerline miles of new public
road.
7. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building
permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that
time. The impact fee assessment will not be released until the civil plans are approved by ACHD.
8. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/ Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP):
• Cloverdale Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5 -lanes from Fairview Avenue
to Ustick Road in 2019.
• Cloverdale Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5 -lanes from Ustick Road to
McMillan Road in 2019.
• Cloverdale Road and Bridge Number 1422 is scheduled in the IFYWP to be
replaced/widened/built in 2019.
• Fairview Avenue is listed in the CIP to be widened to 7 -lanes from Cloverdale Road to Five
Mile Road between 2031 and 2035.
• Fairview Avenue is listed in the CIP to be widened to 7 -lanes from Eagle Road (SH -55) to
Cloverdale Road between 2026 to 2030.
• The intersection of Fairview Avenue and Cloverdale Road is listed in the CIP to be widened
to 7 -lanes on the north leg, 6 -lanes on the south, 8 -lanes east, and 8 -lanes on the west leg,
and signalized between 2021 and 2025.
B. Traffic Findings for Consideration
1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 47 additional vehicle trips per day (9
existing); 5 additional vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak hour (1 existing), based on the Institute
of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th edition.
2. Condition of Area Roadways
Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH)
2 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
Functional
PM Peak
PM Peak
Existing
Roadway
Frontage
Classification
Hour
Hour Level
Plus
Traffic Count
of Service
Project
Cloverdale Road
0 -feet
Minor Arterial
1,016
"F"
"F"
Granger Avenue
255 -feet
Collector
60
Better than
"D„
Better than
"D„
Grenadier Way
168 -feet
Collector
N/A
N/A
N/A
Alicia Street
50 -feet
Local
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
* Acceptable level of service for a two-lane minor arterial is "E" (575 VPH).
* Acceptable level of service for a two-lane collector is "D" (425 VPH).
3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT)
Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts.
The average daily traffic count for Cloverdale Road north of Fairview Avenue was 21,180 on
June 21, 2017.
The average daily traffic count for Granger Avenue west of Cloverdale Road was 1,980 on
December 8, 2015.
• There are no current traffic counts for Grenedier Way, Granger Drive or Alicia Street.
C. Findings for Consideration
1. Cloverdale Road Level of Service
As noted above, Cloverdale Road exceeds the acceptable level of service (LOS) for a 2 -lane minor
arterial roadway. However, Cloverdale Road from Fairview Avenue to Ustick Road is scheduled in
the Integrated Five -Year Work Plan (IFYWP) to be widened to 5 -lanes in 2019. Cloverdale Road
will operate at an acceptable level of service for a 5 -lane minor arterial roadway.
2. Granger Avenue & Grenadier Way
a. Existing Conditions: Granger Avenue & Grenadier Way are improved with 2 -travel lanes (33 -
feet of pavement), on -street parking, vertical curb, gutter, and 5 -foot wide detached sidewalk
abutting the site. There is 50 -feet of right-of-way for Granger Avenue & Grenadier Way (25 -feet
from centerline).
There is an existing residential driveway and an existing driveway for the shop onto Granger
Avenue.
b. Policy:
Collector Street Policy: District policy 7206.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all collector frontages adjacent to the site or internal to the development as required
below, regardless of whether access is taken to all of the adjacent streets.
Master Street Map and Typologies Policy: District policy 7206.5 states that if the collector
street is designated with a typology on the Master Street Map, that typology shall be considered
for the required street improvements. If there is no typology listed in the Master Street Map,
then standard street sections shall serve as the default.
Street Section and Right -of -Way Policy: District policy 7206.5.2 states that the standard
right-of-way width for collector streets shall typically be 50 to 70 -feet, depending on the location
and width of the sidewalk and the location and use of the roadway. The right-of-way width may
be reduced, with District approval, if the sidewalk is located within an easement; in which case
the District will require a minimum right-of-way width that extends 2 -feet behind the back -of -
curb on each side.
The standard street section shall be 46 -feet (back -of -curb to back -of -curb). This width typically
accommodates a single travel lane in each direction, a continuous center left -turn lane, and bike
lanes.
Residential Collector Policy: District policy 7206.5.2 states that the standard street section
for a collector in a residential area shall be 36 -feet (back -of -curb to back -of -curb). The District
will consider a 33 -foot or 29 -foot street section with written fire department approval and taking
into consideration the needs of the adjacent land use, the projected volumes, the need for
bicycle lanes, and on -street parking.
3 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
Sidewalk Policy: District policy 7206.5.6 requires a concrete sidewalks at least 5 -feet wide to
be constructed on both sides of all collector streets. A parkway strip at least 6 -feet wide between
the back -of -curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and
protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed
within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back -of -curb shall be a minimum of
7 -feet wide.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2 -feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.
Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing
streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to
correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or
replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways
with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement
repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items.
Access Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with
development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section
and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is
being considered by the lead land use agency. Approved access points may be relocated
and/or restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops.
District Policy 7206.1 states that the primary function of a collector is to intercept traffic from the
local street system and carry that traffic to the nearest arterial. A secondary function is to service
adjacent property. Access will be limited or controlled. Collectors may also be designated at
bicycle and bus routes.
Successive Driveways: District policy 7206.4.5 Table 1, requires driveways located on
collector roadways with a speed limit of 20 MPH and daily traffic volumes greater than 100 VTD
to align or offset a minimum of 245 -feet from any existing or proposed driveway.
Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7206.4.6 restricts high-volume driveways (100 VTD or
more) to a maximum width of 36 -feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 VTD) to a
maximum width of 30 -feet. Curb return type driveways with 30 -foot radii will be required for high-
volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 15 -foot radii will be
required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 VTD.
Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance
problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy,
7206.4.6, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30 -
feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers in
accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7206.4.6.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is not proposing any improvements to Granger Avenue &
Grenadier Way abutting the site.
The applicant is proposing to construct a 16 -foot wide asphalt pedestrian pathway, onto Granger
Avenue in alignment with Granger Drive, and will restrict the pathway with bollards.
The applicant is proposing to retain the residential and shop driveway on Granger Avenue,
located 520 -feet and 594 -feet west of Tyra Avenue (measured centerline -to -centerline).
4 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: Granger Avenue & Grenadier Way are fully improved
with 2 -travel lanes, vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting the site. Therefore, no
additional right-of-way or street improvements are required as part of this application.
The applicant should restrict the 16 -foot wide asphalt pedestrian pathway onto Granger
Avenue in alignment with Granger Drive, with a gate or bollards, located outside the public
right-of-way.
The two existing driveways on Lot 1, Block 16, do not meet District Successive policy;
however, staff recommends a modification of policy to allow the driveways to be remain
because they provide access to the existing home and shop and are low traffic volume
driveways.
3. Alicia Street
a. Existing Conditions: There is a stub street, Alicia Street, that was platted and constructed in
2003 to the site's east property line with the Dawson Meadows Subdivision.
b. Policy:
Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is
taken to all of the adjacent streets.
Street Section and Right -of -Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way widths
for all local streets shall generally not be less than 47 -feet wide and that the standard street
section shall be 33 -feet (back -of -curb to back -of -curb).
Standard Urban Local Street -33 -foot Street Section and Right-of-way Policy: District
Policy 7207.5.2 states that the standard street section shall be 33 -feet (back -of -curb to back -of -
curb) for developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section
shall include curb, gutter, and minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks on both sides and shall
typically be constructed within 47 -feet of right-of-way.
For the City of Kuna and City of Star: Unless otherwise approved by Kuna or Star, the standard
street section shall be 36 -feet (back -of -curb to back -of -curb) for developments with any
buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section shall include curb, gutter, and
minimum 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks on both sides and shall typically be constructed within
50 -feet of right-of-way.
Continuation of Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.2.4 states that an existing street, or a
street in an approved preliminary plat, which ends at a boundary of a proposed development
shall be extended in that development. The extension shall include provisions for continuation
of storm drainage facilities. Benefits of connectivity include but are not limited to the following:
• Reduces vehicle miles traveled.
• Increases pedestrian and bicycle connectivity.
• Increases access for emergency services.
• Reduces need for additional access points to the arterial street system
• Promotes the efficient delivery of services including trash, mail and deliveries.
• Promotes appropriate intra -neighborhood traffic circulation to schools, parks,
neighborhood commercial centers, transit stops, etc.
• Promotes orderly development.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete sidewalk is
required on both sides of all local street, except those in rural developments with net densities
of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot
5 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street. Some local
jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks.
The sidewalk may be placed next to the back -of -curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least
8 -feet wide between the back -of -curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to
provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the planting of trees in
accordance with the District's Tree Planting Policy. If no trees are to be planted in the parkway
strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification, to reduce the width of
the parkway strip.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of
the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-
of-way line and 2 -feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located
wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.
Cul-de-sac Streets Policy: District policy 7207.5.8 requires cul-de-sacs to be constructed to
provide a minimum turning radius of 45 -feet; in rural areas or for temporary cul-de-sacs the
emergency service providers may require a greater radius. Landscape and parking islands may
be constructed in turnarounds if a minimum 29 -foot street section is constructed around the
island. The pavement width shall be sufficient to allow the turning around of a standard
AASHTO SU design vehicle without backing. The developer shall provide written approval from
the appropriate fire department for this design element.
The District will consider alternatives to the standard cul-de-sac turnaround on a case-by-case
basis. This will be based on turning area, drainage, maintenance considerations and the written
approval of the agency providing emergency fire service for the area where the development is
located.
Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing
streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to
correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or
replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways
with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement
repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items.
Landscape Medians Policy: District policy 7207.5.16 states that landscape medians are
permissible where adequate pavement width is provided on each side of the median to
accommodate the travel lanes and where the following is provided:
• The median is platted as right-of-way owned by ACHD.
• The width of an island near an intersection is 12 -feet maximum for a minimum distance of
150 -feet. Beyond the 150 -feet, the island may increase to a maximum width of 30 -feet.
• At an intersection that is signalized or is to be signalized in the future, the median width
shall be reduced to accommodate the necessary turn lane storage and tapers.
• The Developer or Homeowners Association shall apply for a license agreement if
landscaping is to be placed within these medians.
• The license agreement shall contain the District's requirements of the developer including,
but not limited to, a "hold harmless" clause; requirements for maintenance by the
developer; liability insurance requirements; and restrictions.
Vertical curbs are required around the perimeter of any raised median. Gutters shall slope away
from the curb to prevent ponding.
6 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to extend Alicia Street into the site as a private
lane with 6 marked parking spaces and terminate in a cul-de-sac.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal to extend Alicia Street into the
site as a private lane with 6 marked parking stalls does not meet District Policy because stub
streets cannot dead end into a private street without a public turnaround.
The applicant should extend Alicia Street into the site as a 36 -foot public street section with
rolled curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide sidewalk to match existing improvements to the east.
The applicant should construct a public cul-de-sac at the terminus of Alicia Street to provide a
minimum turning radius of 45 -feet.
The applicant should be required to dedicate right-of-way to encompass the cul-de-sac to 2 -feet
behind back of sidewalk; or provide a permanent right-of-way easement to 2 -feet behind back
of sidewalk for any public sidewalk placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way.
Note to City of Meridian: Red Feather Estates Subdivision No. 2 Plat Note #3: Any re-
subdivision of this plat shall comply with the applicable zoning regulations in effect at the time
of the resubdivision. Upon any redevelopment of Lot 1 Block 16, the existing stub street in
Dawson Meadows Subdivision must be extended to provide interconnectivity between Red
Feather Estates Subdivision No. 2 and Dawson Meadows Subdivision.
4. Tree Planters
Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in
planters less than 8 -feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be
allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8 -feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be allowed
in planters with a minimum width of 10 -feet.
5. Landscaping
Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD
right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10 -feet from all public storm
drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision triangle
at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40 -foot vision triangle and a 3 -foot height
restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50 -foot offset from stop
signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all District
requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans.
6. Other Access
Granger Avenue & Grenadier Way are classified as collector roadways. Direct lot access is
prohibited to Grenadier Way and should be noted on the final plat. Other than the access
specifically approved on Granger Avenue with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to
Granger Avenue and should be noted on the final plat.
D. Site Specific Conditions of Approval
Restrict the 16 -foot wide asphalt pedestrian pathway onto Granger Avenue in alignment with
Granger Drive, with a gate or bollards, located outside the public right-of-way.
2. Extend Alicia Street as a public street into the site, as a 36 -foot street section with rolled curb,
gutter and 5 -foot wide sidewalk, within 50 -feet of right-of-way, to match existing improvements to
the east.
3. Construct the cul-de-sac at the terminus of Alicia Street to provide a minimum turning radius of
45 -feet; and dedicate right-of-way to 2 -feet behind the back of sidewalk.
7 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
4. Direct lot access is prohibited to Grenadier Way and shall be noted on the final plat. Other than
the access specifically approved on Granger Avenue fpr Lot x, Block y, with this application, direct
lot access is prohibited on Granger Avenue and shall be noted on the final plat.
5. Submit civil plans to ACHD Development Services for review and approval. The impact fee
assessment will not be released until the civil plans are approved by ACHD.
6. Payment of impact fees is due prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
E. Standard Conditions of Approval
1. All proposed irrigation facilities shall be located outside of the ACHD right-of-way (including all
easements). Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way
(including all easements).
2. Private Utilities including sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD
right-of-way.
3. In accordance with District policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any existing non-
compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) requirements. The applicant's engineer should provide documentation of ADA compliance
to District Development Review staff for review.
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all
landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas.
6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant
shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking
ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190
in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction.
8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details.
9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards
and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Standards
unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and
certify all improvement plans.
10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy.
11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of
any change from ACHD.
12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan
and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in
the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant
to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless a
waiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission.
8 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
F. Conclusions of Law
1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval
are satisfied.
2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the
proposed development.
G. Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Utility Coordinating Council
4. Development Process Checklist
5. Appeal Guidelines
9 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
VICINITY MAP
K 4 }� i• 1T
wilish DI
L�
10 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
SITE PLAN
PRELIMINARY PIAT FOR
ALICIA COURT SUBDIVISION
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SW 114 OF THE NE 114 OF SECTION 4,
T.3N., R.1E., B.M., CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
2018
SEWE&WATERACCESSRQAD
,, .9LfCL1 LLtiE i
fPHL\'ASNJ
0 0
Rrsawffrou Dial
�EMwr
11 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
Ada County Utility Coordinating Council
Developer/Local Improvement District
Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request
Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway and
road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process.
1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way improvements
by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected utility owners and
the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include but not be limited to,
project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated construction dates, and any
portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination of utilities.
2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with
preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of
utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the utility
owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting the
developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary for their
project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal, adjust and/or
negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the developer with a letter
of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its facilities. Said letter of review
is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the plan review conference.
3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary
plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the
preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days
after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon.
4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with
final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the anticipated
date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be performed shall be
pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall schedule a
preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity shall be
completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless otherwise
agreed upon.
Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit iducc.com
for e-mail notification information.
12 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
Development Process Checklist
Items Completed to Date:
®Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County
®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
®The ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review
®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following:
❑Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at
this time.
®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
®Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system
and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
Items to be completed by Applicant:
❑For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter:
• The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development
Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements
required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.)
• The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-way,
including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
❑Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER:
Construction (Non -Subdivisions)
❑ Driveway or Property Approach(s)
• Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to ACHD Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic
Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
❑ Working in the ACHD Right -of -Way
• Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit
Application" to ACHD Construction — Permits along with:
a) Traffic Control Plan
b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you
are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Construction (Subdivisions)
❑ Sediment & Erosion Submittal
• At least one week prior to setting up a Pre -Construction Meeting an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plan, done
by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD
Stormwater Section.
❑ Idaho Power Company
• Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre -Con being
scheduled.
❑ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling a Pre -Con.
13 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of
the final decision made by the Development Services Manager when it is alleged that the
Development Services Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of
the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily
and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual.
a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged
the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs.
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary
and Clerk of the District, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of
the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the
decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number
and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the
provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and
shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not
consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
c. Time to Reply: The Development Services Manager shall have ten (10) working days
from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and
may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider
and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any
modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the
Commission hearing on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal
will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held
within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the Development Services
Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice
of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior
to the hearing.
e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or
reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being
appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at
the hearing.
14 DRAFT Alicia Court/ MPP18-0029/
H-2018-0107