Loading...
PZ - Traffic Impact StudyTanner Creek Subdivision Meridian, Idaho November 8, 2017 Thompson Engineers Traffic and Civil Inc. 181 East 50`h St Garden City, ID 83714 (208) 484-4410 S: IprojeclsW-27 Tanner CreekldocslTanner Creek Subdivision - TlSdocx Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Traffic and Civil Inc. Meridian, Idaho Table of Contents EXECUTIVESUMMARY.......................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 1 ProposedDevelopment............................................................................................................................. 1 Proposed Mitigation for 2017 Existing Traffic........................................................................................ 1 Proposed Mitigation for 2022 (Build -Out Year) Background Traffic ...................................................... 2 Proposed Mitigation for 2022 (Build -Out Year) Total Traffic................................................................. 2 PROPOSEDDEVELOPMENT.................................................................................................................... 3 STUDYAPPROACH................................................................................................................................... 5 StudyArea................................................................................................................................................ 5 StudyPeriod............................................................................................................................................. 5 EXISTINGCONDITIONS........................................................................................................................... 5 RoadSystem............................................................................................................................................. 5 ExistingTraffic Volumes......................................................................................................................... 6 IntersectionCrash Data............................................................................................................................ 8 RoadwayNetwork Improvements............................................................................................................ 8 PROJECTEDTRAFFIC............................................................................................................................... 8 BackgroundTraffic.................................................................................................................................. 8 SiteTraffic.............................................................................................................................................. 10 TripGeneration.................................................................................................................................. 10 TripCapture....................................................................................................................................... 10 Pass -by Trips...................................................................................................................................... 10 ModalSplit......................................................................................................................................... 11 Trip Distribution and Assignment...................................................................................................... 11 TotalTraffic............................................................................................................................................ 11 TRAFFICANALYSIS............................................................................................................................... 14 2017 Existing Traffic.............................................................................................................................. 14 Roadway Segment Level of Service.................................................................................................. 14 Intersection Capacity Analysis and Level of Service......................................................................... 15 Mitigation........................................................................................................................................... 15 2022 Build -Out Year Background Traffic.............................................................................................. 16 Roadway Segment Level of Service.................................................................................................. 16 Intersection Capacity Analysis and Level of Service......................................................................... 16 Mitigation........................................................................................................................................... 17 2022 Build -Out Year Total Traffic......................................................................................................... 18 Roadway Seginent Level of Service.................................................................................................. 18 Intersection Capacity Analysis and Level of Service......................................................................... 18 Mitigation........................................................................................................................................... 19 SiteAccess and Circulation.................................................................................................................... 20 APPENDIX.................................................................................................................................................. A November 2017 Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Traff c and C;v;l.4Inc. Meridian, Idaho List of Figures Figure 1 — Site Location and Vicinity........................................................................................................... 3 Figure2 Preliminary Site Plan...................................................................................................................4 Figure 3 — 2017 Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic............................................................................ 7 Figure 4 — 2022 Build -Out Year Peak Hour Redistributed Background Traffic .......................................... 9 Figure 5 — Site Traffic Distribution Patterns............................................................................................... 11 Figure 6 — Build -Out AM and PM Peak Hour Site Traffic......................................................................... 12 Figure 7 — 2022 Build -out Year AM and PM Peak Hour Total Traffic ...................................................... 13 Figure 8 — Proposed Access Locations and Internal Roadway ADTs........................................................ 20 List of Tables Table 1 — 2017 Existing ADT and Directional Peak Hour Volumes Summary ........................................... 6 Table 2 — Build -Out Site Trip Generation Summary ..................................................................................10 Table 3 — Roadway Segment Thresholds — 2017 Existing Traffic on Local Streets .................................. 14 Table 4 - Roadway Segment Level of Service - 2017 Existing Traffic on Collector Roads ......................14 Table 5 — Intersection Level of Service — 2017 Existing Traffic Stop Controlled ...................................... 15 Table 6 — Intersection Level of Service - 2017 Existing Traffic Signal Controlled ................................... 15 Table 7 — Lane Group v/c Ratio — 2017 Existing Traffic Intersection Signal Controlled .......................... 15 Table 8 — Roadway Segment Thresholds — 2022 Background Traffic on Local Streets ............................ 16 Table 9 - Roadway Segment Level of Service — 2022 Background Traffic on Collector Roads ............... 16 Table 10 — Intersection Level of Service — 2022 Background Traffic Stop Controlled .............................16 Table 11 — Intersection Level of Service - 2022 Background Traffic Signal Controlled ........................... 17 Table 12 — Lane Group v/c Ratio — 2022 Background Traffic Intersection Signal Controlled ..................17 Table 13 — Roadway Segment Thresholds — 2022 Total Traffic on Local Streets ..................................... 18 Table 14 - Roadway Segment Level of Service — 2022 Total Traffic on Collector Roads ......................... 18 Table 15 — Intersection Level of Service — 2022 Total Traffic Stop Controlled ........................................ 18 Table 16 — Intersection Level of Service - 2022 Total Traffic Signal Controlled ...................................... 19 Table 17 — Lane Group We Ratio — 2022 Total Traffic Intersection Signal Controlled ............................. 19 Table 18 — Site Access Intersection Level of Service — 2022 Build -Out Year Total Traffic ..................... 21 November 2017 11 Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Traffic and Civ;r Inc. Meridian, Idaho Introduction Thompson Engineers, Inc. has been retained to prepare a traffic impact study (TIS) for the proposed Tanner Creek Subdivision located on Waltman Road in Meridian, Idaho, as shown in Figure 1. The TIS evaluates the potential traffic impacts resulting from the development and make recommendations for mitigation of the impacts. The scope of this report was determined through coordination with the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) and was prepared in accordance with ACHD Policy, Section 7106 — Traffic Impact Studies. Proposed Development 1. Tanner Creek Subdivision is a proposed residential development containing 85 single-family detached housing units, 44 townhouses, and 280 apartments with an expected 2022 build -out year. 2. Based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, the development is estimated to generate approximately 2,928 trips per day, 226 trips during the AM peak hour and 282 trips during the PM peak hour. The development is not expected to retain internal trips within the site or generate pass -by trips. '! All trips generated by the development are expected to be made by personal vehicles. The estimated site traffic distribution patterns are: • 10% west of the site • 90% east of the site 3. All proposed internal roadways are projected to carry less than 1,000 vehicles per day. 4. The proposed driveway locations on Waltman Lane generally meet the ACHD's access spacing and design. 5. This project will connect the existing subdivisions to the west to Waltman Lane. This will provide shorter travel route to many destinations for many trips originating within the existing subdivisions. As a result, we anticipate that traffic from the existing subdivisions will redistribute and use Waltman Lane instead of Linder Road to access the transportation system 6. The existing subdivisions to the west are currently served only by Linder Road to access the transportation system. There are more than 700 homes in the traffic shed. The connection to Waltman Lane will provide a critical link to the transportation system and will greatly increase the safety of the existing subdivisions. Proposed osed itigation for 2017 Existing Traffic 7. All of the intersections in the study area operate at an acceptable level of service under existing traffic conditions. No mitigation is necessary. 8. All of the roadway segments studied operate below the recommended maximum threshold for local or collector roads. Not mitigation is necessary. November 2017 1 ThompsonEngineers Traffic and Civil Inc. Traffic Impact Study Tanner Creek Subdivision Meridian, Idaho Proposed Mitigation for 2022 (Build -Out Year) Background Traffic 9. For background traffic conditions, it was assumed that the connection from the existing subdivisions to the west to Waltman Lane was complete and traffic will redistribute. With traffic growth and redistributed traffic, all of the intersections are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service. No mitigation is necessary. 10. All of the roadway segments studied are anticipated to operate below the recommended maximum threshold for local or collector roads. No mitigation is necessary. Proposed Mitigation for 2022 (Build -Out Year) Total Traffic 11. With the addition of site traffic added to background traffic, all of the intersections are anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service. No mitigation is necessary. 12. All of the roadway segments studied are anticipated to operate below the recommended maximum threshold for local or collector roads. No mitigation is necessary. November 2017 2 Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Traffic and Civ;l'-4Inc. Meridian, Idaho Location The proposed Tanner Creek Subdivision is located on Waltman Lane in Meridian, Idaho. Figure 1 shows the site location and its vicinity. Current Development Figure 2 shows the preliminary site plan with proposed access locations and land uses. Tanner Creek Subdivision is a proposed residential subdivision containing 85 single-family lots, 44 townhouses, and 280 apartments. The expected build -out year is 2022. The development is proposing two full access approaches on Waltman Lane for site access. The development will also connect to the subdivision to the west via Ruddy Drive. Figure 1— Site Location and Vicinity November 2017 3 ThompsonEngineers Traffic and CivH Inc. Figure 2 — Preliminary Site Plan � I I J L _ Waltman Lane p( t I I 7 t i jI P f Ruddv Drive '( 44�__ ;"Townhous-es, I Traffic Impact Study Tanner Creek Subdivision Meridian, Idaho Previous Development A previous application for this site was for 200,000 SF of retail space and 150,000 SF of office park. The site was estimated to generate 10,300 trips per day and 975 during the PM peak hour, according to the ACHD staff report for Browning Plaza, dated March 5, 2008. November 2017 4 Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision rralfla and c '4k.Inc. Meridian, Idaho STUDY APPROACH This study follows the ACHD's requirements for transportation impact studies. The study area, specific parameters and requirements for the study were coordinated with ACHD's staff. Scoping emails and results from the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS) area of influence model runs are included in the appendix. Study y rea The following study area intersections were identified by ACHD for the traffic impact analysis: Meridian Road/Main Street and Central Drive/Waltman Lane FEV Linder Road and Gander Drive Proposed access driveway intersections on Waltman Lane The following study area roadway segments were identified by ACHD for the traffic impact analysis: Waltman Lane east of the site Elder Drive east of Pelican Way G Gander Drive east of Linder Road It'' Pelican Way south of Waltman Drive Ft Waltman Drive east of Pelican Study Period The analysis peak periods will be the AM and PM peak hours of operation of the transportation system. The analysis years are: V 2017 existing traffic 2022 build -out year background traffic 2022 build -out year total traffic 1�5 ®ad System r A brief description of the existing roadways and intersections within the study area is described below. The roadway functional classification is based on COMPASS 2040 Functional Classification Map, which does not include collector or local streets. Waltman Lane is not classified in the COMPASS snap. Waltman Lane functions as a collector street with a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour (mph). In front of the site, it has one travel lane in each direction with a rural section without curb, gutter, sidewalk or designated bike lane. Waltman Lane ends just to the west of the site. Linder Road is classified as a principal arterial road in the COMPASS map with a posted speed limit of E< 35 mph. It has one lane in each direction with a rural section with curb, gutter, and sidewalk in the vicinity of this project. Linder Road terminates at I-84 on the south end. Elder Drive, Gander Drive, Pelican Way, Pintail Drive, and Waltman Drive are not classified by COMPASS. They function as local roads with front on housing access. These streets do not have posted speed limits, but the City if Meridian City Code designates a speed limit of 20 mph on local roads. All of November 2017 5 Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Traffic and CivY tnc: Meridian, Idaho the roads are urban sections approximately 36 feet wide, with curb, gutter and sidewalk. All of the roads permit on street parking. Waltman/Central and Main/Meridian intersection is a signal controlled intersection. Waltman Lane has two left turn lanes, one through lane, and one right turn lane at the intersection. This intersection is the terminus of the Main Street and Meridian Road one way couplet. All approaches have multiple lanes. Gander Drive and Linder Road intersection is a stop -controlled intersection with stop sign on the Gander Drive. The intersection has one shared lane for all movements on all approaches. Existing Traffic Volumes AM and PM peak hour traffic counts were obtained at the study intersections on October 16, 2017. The peak our intersection turning movement counts were collected on a weekday for a 2 -hour period at 15 - minute intervals between 7:00 and 9:00 during the AM peak travel period hour and between 4:00 and 6:00 during the PM peak travel period, which are included in the appendix. Existing peak hour traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 3. 24-hour counts were also obtained for the study area roadway segments — summarized in Table 1. 'r.hl. 1 _ Will Fviufma AiIT and DirPrtinnal Pvalr Amir VnIume..0 S1lmmary Roadway` Se mentADT�j Peak Hour Directional Eider Drive east of Pelican Way 248 AM WB 19 PM EB 17 Gander Drive east of Linder Road 694 AM WB 41 PM EB 42 Pelican Way south of Waltman Drive 679 AM NB 46 PM SB 39 Pintail Drive south of Waltman Drive 1444 AM WB 87 PM EB 98 Waltman Drive east of Pelican Way 182 AM WB 12 PM EB 16 Waltman Lane east of Johnson 190 AM WB 7 PM WB 17 November 2017 6 Traffic Impact Study Thompson;engineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Traffic and CInc: Meridian, Idaho Figure 3 — 2017 Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic 7 8CD 0� 9� 6 58 13 27 O0 6 97 1 144 41 21 O 6 110 0 November 2017 7 s AM Peak Hour 1067 86 '�=88 O (� 1 128 1552 320 58 13 27 O0 6 97 1 144 41 21 O 6 110 0 November 2017 7 s PM Peak Hour 15$1 154 O0 204 468 1612 253 58 13 27 O0 6 97 1 144 41 21 O 6 110 0 November 2017 7 s Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Traffic and Civil Inc. Meridian, Idaho Intersectio Crash Data The most current five-year crash data (2011-2015) was obtained from the Local Highway Technical Assistance Council (LHTAC) website (http://gis.lhtac.org/safety. No accidents were reported on Waltman Lane. Only two accidents were reported in the subdivision to the west along the anticipated travel routes. Roadway Network Improvements At the time of this study, the ACHD 2016 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) included a project to widen Linder Road from 2 lanes to 5 lanes. The ITD Idaho Transportation Investment Program (ITIP) FY2017- 2021, FY2018-2024 (Draft) included a plan to construct an overpass of Linder Road over Interstate 84. These projects are in the 2031-2035 planning period and are unfunded. This project will connect the subdivision to the west to Waltman Lane. This will provide a shorter route to destinations such as shopping centers and jobs, as well as shorter access to the interstate. It is anticipated that this improvement will impact existing travel patterns. Background Traffic The areas adjacent to the site are mostly build -out. The following annual growth rates were used to estimate the traffic growth for the study area roadways and intersections: • 1.5% on Meridian Road, and Main Street • 1.0% on Waltman Lane and Central Drive • 0.0% on the local roads west of the site. • 0.5% on Linder Road As noted above, the connection of Ruddy Drive to Waltman Lane will change the travel patterns of people in the subdivision to the west. The redistributed traffic is assigned to the transportation system in the background phase of this study. Figure 4 shows the 2022 build -out year redistributed background turning movement traffic for the AM and PM peak hours. November 2017 8 Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Trac and Civil"Ok.Inc. Meridian, Idaho Figure 4 — 2022 Build -Out Year Peak Hour Redistributed Background Traffic AM Peak Hour 11 1149 93 59 7 0 a Q* 33E:9 'a �92 �=10 12C� 1 6 D 67 135 �6 25 1672 345 59 7 PM Peak Hour 44 1703 166 148 23 0 Z 4 29C:9 214 (=� 10 7=� O (�12 22 51 E:� � 492 � 6 78 1737 273 113 0 November 2017 9 Traffic Impact Study Thompson ,Engineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Traffic and Civ;l Inc. Meridian, Idaho Site Traffic Trip Generation Site trip generation is usually estimated using the procedures recommended in the latest edition of the Trip Generation Manual (9`t' edition), published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, in the absence of site-specific data. The site trip generation is obtained by applying the average trip generation rates obtained from the Manual for the proposed land use within the development. Table 2 summarizes the site trip generation. At full build -out, the development is estimated to generate approximately 2,928 trips per day, 226 trips during the AM peak hour and 282 trips during the PM peak hour. 'r.161. I — R„ilrl_(hit .Cita Trin f_'nnni•atinn Cnmmai-v The previous application for a retail and office development generated 10,300 trips per day, 975 of which occurred in the PM peak hour. The ACHD staff report did not provide AM peak hour trip generation. The proposed development will generate less than 30% of the volume of traffic than the former development proposal. Trip Capture Based on the proposed land use, the development is not expected to retain trips within the site at full build -out. No trip reduction for internal capture trip was assumed in the traffic impact analysis. Pass -by Trips The development is residential and is not expected to attract pass -by trips. No pass -by trips were assumed in the traffic impact analysis. November 2017 10 Internal PrimaryTrip ITE Trip Rate Total Capture Pass -by Land Use Code Size Unit per Unit Tris Tris Tris Total . Entering Exiting Weekday Daily (vpd) Single -Family Detached 210 85 DU 9.52 810 — 810 50% 405 50% 405 Housing Residential/ 230 44 DU 5.81 256 256 50% 128 50% 128 Condominium Townhouse Apartment 220 280 DU 6.65 1,862 1,862 50% 931 50% 931 Total Trips 2,928 2,928 1,464 1,464 Weekday AM Peak Hour, (vph) Single -Family Detached 210 85 DU 0.75 64 64 25% 16 75% 48 Housin Residential/ 230 44 DU 0.44 19 — — 19 17% 3 83% 16 Condominium Townhouse Apartment 220 280 DU 0.51 143 — 143 20% 29 80% 114 Total Trips 226 226 48 178 Weekday PM Peak Hour (vph) Single -Family Detached 210 85 DU 1.00 85 — 85 63% 54 37% 31 Housing Residential/ 230 44 DU 0.52 23 — 23 67% 15 33% 8 Condominium Townhouse Apartment 220 280 DU 0.62 174 — 174 65% 113 35% 61 Total Trips 282 282 182 100 The previous application for a retail and office development generated 10,300 trips per day, 975 of which occurred in the PM peak hour. The ACHD staff report did not provide AM peak hour trip generation. The proposed development will generate less than 30% of the volume of traffic than the former development proposal. Trip Capture Based on the proposed land use, the development is not expected to retain trips within the site at full build -out. No trip reduction for internal capture trip was assumed in the traffic impact analysis. Pass -by Trips The development is residential and is not expected to attract pass -by trips. No pass -by trips were assumed in the traffic impact analysis. November 2017 10 Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Trafc and Civil Inc. Meridian, Idaho Modal Split The development is not expected to generate trips made by other modes beside personal and commercial vehicles. All trips generated by the development were assumed to be made by personal and commercial vehicles. Trip Distribution and Assignment In order to determine the impacts, trips generated by the development must be distributed and assigned to the transportation system. Site traffic was distributed and assigned to the external roadway system based on the current travel patterns, site layout and the general location of the site within the area. Figure 5 shows the expected site traffic distribution patterns. Figure 6 summarizes the estimated build -out site traffic. Figure 5 — Site Traffic Distribution Patterns Total Traffic is The site traffic is then added to the background traffic as determined above. Figure 7 shows the total traffic at each intersection for AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions for the 2022 build -out year. November 2017 11 Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Traffic and C;v;l4k Inc. Meridian, Idaho Figure 6 — Build -Out AM and PM Peak Hour Site Traffic 13 0 0 48� �0 16� 1 4 96� �0 26 0 0 49 0 0 fj� 27 c/ �0 9E=* O (__=16 54 V 0 98 0 0 AM Peak Hour 0 5 �8 O 90 0 0 0=:* @3 0 0 C,� 10 60 PM Peak Hour @3 0 10 60 I, I NTS 60E=� O (�10 0� '6�D33 100 60=::� O4 �L= 60 OC1 � 117 100� November 2017 12 Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Traffic and Civil Inc: Meridian, Idaho Figure 7 — 2022 Build -out Year AM and PM Peak Hour Total Traffic �t. r '' c f�2 ................. .................:.... 24 1149 93 81 28=4 O 192 �=10 163 135 51 1672 345 93 1703 166 56=/ 16==� O 214 �28 492 176 1737 273 AM Peak Hour 0 59 12 �0 0 18 0� O �6 0 99 1 PM Peak Hour 0 148 41 0 1�=20 0� O �6 ��-a �F 0 113 0 O�=° 0[:�46 0 69::, 0 167 O1==�O0 0 E:�� 180 0 100 I I NTS 167 C=�J � 46 0� v � 33 100 100 O4 (� 180 0 117 0 60 November 2017 13 Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Traffla and C;v;1'4.Inc. Meridian, Idaho Roadway segment was evaluated based on ACHD level of service standards in accordance with Table 2 of the ACHD Policy Manual, Section 7106. The roadway segment level of service is based on the maximum peak hour directional volume for different roadway functional classifications, number of through lanes, and left -turn type. The minimum acceptable level of service is LOS D for collectors. Local streets should be limited to a maximum of 2,000 vehicles per day, based on section 7207.3.1 of the ACHD Policy Manual. Intersection capacity analysis was performed using the Synchro 10 (Version 10.1.26), which utilizes the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual methodologies. All parameters used in the analysis were based on existing data when available or Synchro default values, when not available. Level of service for intersection is based on the average delay of vehicles traveling through the intersection. According to ACHD policy, the minimum acceptable level of service is LOS D with a We ratio of 0.90 for the intersection and 1.00 for a lane group. 2017 ExistingTraffic Roadway Segment Level of Service The study area roadway segments level of service were evaluated with 2017 existing traffic. Table 3 summarizes the review for local roads impacted. Table 4 summarizes the review for collector roads impacted. All study area roadway segments currently meets minimum operational thresholds with the existing lane configuration. No roadway capacities improvements are needed to mitigate 2017 existing traffic. Tnhh- I — Rnnrlwnv CeQment Thresholds — 2017 Existing Traffic on local Streets Roadway` Segment ADT Below Threshold? Eider Drive east of Pelican Way 248 Yes Gander Drive east of Linder Road 694 Yes Pelican Way south of Waltman Drive 679 Yes Pintail Drive south of Waltman Drive 1444 Yes Waltman Drive east of Pelican Way 182 Yes Tahle d - Rnndwnv Seument T,eVel of Service - 2017 Existing Traffic on Collector Roads November 2017 14 Peak Hour LOS D Directional Meet Volume Volume (vph) Minimum, AM PM' Functional Left -Turn ' Threshold Acceptable Roadway Segment Class. Lane Type (vph) Peak Peak LOS? Waltman Lane East of Johnson Collector None 425 7 17 Yes November 2017 14 Thompson Engineers rrernc eoecmn tn<. Traffic Impact Study Tanner Creek Subdivision Meridian, Idaho Intersection Capacity Analysis and Level of Service To determine the existing traffic impacts, the study area intersections were analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configuration and 2017 peak hour traffic. Copies of the calculations are included in the appendix. Table 51 Table 6 and Table 7 summarize the measures of effectives (MOE) firma the intersection capacity analysis. Based on traffic analysis results, both study area intersections are currently operating at an acceptable level of service. Tahln S _ lnteraeeHnn Level of Service — 2017 Rxistim, Traffic Ston Controlled Table 6— Intersection Level of Service - 2017 Existing Traffic Signal Controlled Approach AM Peak Hour AM PM Intersection Control MOEs Peak Hour Peak Hour O Meridian/Main and Waltman/Central NB LOS A A 0.46 0.61 0.30 (WB) 0.31 O LinderAnd Road Stop Delay 9.1 9.4 0.06 Waltman/Central (WB Conder) (WB) 0.52 0.70 0.52 Gander Drive 0.78 Worst lane A(WB) A(WB) Worst Lane E(EBTR) E(WBR) Group LOS Table 6— Intersection Level of Service - 2017 Existing Traffic Signal Controlled Table 7—Lane Grau v/c Ratio — 2017 Ex'sting Traffic Intersection Signal Controlled Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour AM PM Intersection Control MOEs Peak Hour Peak Hour O Meridian/Main and Waltman/Central NB Intersection A C 0.46 0.61 0.30 LOS 0.31 Intersection Delay (stv) 8.6 25.0 OIntersection Meridian/Main and Traffic Signal 0.06 Waltman/Central 0.10 0.00 0.52 0.70 0.52 0.0 0.78 Vic 0.00 0.86 Worst Lane E(EBTR) E(WBR) Group LOS Table 7—Lane Grau v/c Ratio — 2017 Ex'sting Traffic Intersection Signal Controlled Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LT TURD RT LT THRU RT O Meridian/Main and Waltman/Central NB 0.44 0.49 0.31 0.46 0.61 0.30 SB0.80 0.31 0.00 0.86 0.51 0.01 EB 0.03 0.06 0.21 0.10 0.00 0.23 WH 0.52 0.0 0.78 0.90 0.00 0.86 Mitigation No mitigation is necessary to address issues with 2017 existing traffic. November 2017 15 Thompson. Engineers rflc Treandtava Ino. 2022 Build -Out Year Background Trak Trak Impact Study Tanner Creek Subdivision Meridian. Idaho Roadway Segment Level of Service The study area roadway segments level of service were evaluated with 2022 background traffic. Table 8 summarizes the results for the local roads. Table 9 summarizes the results for the collector road. All study area roadway segments are expected to meet minimum operational thresholds with the existing lane configuration. No roadway capacities improvements are needed to mitigate 2022 background traffic, Table R –Roadway, Segment Thresholds– 2022 Background Traffic on Local Streets Roadway Segment Existing ADT Redistributed Traffic Total Traffic Below Threshold? Eider Drive cast of Pelican Way 248 +190 438 Yes Gander Drive east of Linder Road 694 -285 409 Yes Pelican Way south of Waltman Drive 679 +285 964 Yes Noted Drive south of Waltman Drive 1444 -850 594 Yes Waltman Drive east of Pelican Way 182 +100 282 Yes Table 9 - Roadwa Se ment Level of Service – 2022 Back round Traffic on Collector Roads Intersection Capacity Analysis and Level of Service To determine the 2022 background traffic impacts, the study area intersections were analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configuration. Copies of the calculations are included in the appendix. Table10, Table 11 and Table 12 summarize the intersection capacity analysis results. All study area intersections are projected to meet minimum operational thresholds. Told, tm _ rnrpr—firm r,evpl of Service —2022 Background Traffic Ston Controlled AM PM Peak Hour Control MOEs Peak Hour Peak Hour LOS D Directional Meet A A Volume Volume (vph) Minimum AM PM Linder Road And Stop FunJ---1 eft-Turn Threshold Acceptable Roadway Segment CaneT e h Peek Peak LOS? Waltman Lane East of Johnson Collector None 425 107 134 Yes Intersection Capacity Analysis and Level of Service To determine the 2022 background traffic impacts, the study area intersections were analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configuration. Copies of the calculations are included in the appendix. Table10, Table 11 and Table 12 summarize the intersection capacity analysis results. All study area intersections are projected to meet minimum operational thresholds. Told, tm _ rnrpr—firm r,evpl of Service —2022 Background Traffic Ston Controlled November 2017 16 AM PM Intersection Control MOEs Peak Hour Peak Hour LOS A A (WB) O Linder Road And Stop Delay (sly) 9.2 9.6 (WB Gander) MR) Gander Drive Worst Lane A(WB) A(WB) Group LOS November 2017 16 ` Traffic Impact Study Thompson Engineers Tanner Geek Subdivision rstW1.acrva me. Meridian, Idaho Table 11— Intersection Level of Service - 2022 Back round Traffic Signal Controlled Table 12 — Lane Group We Ratio —2022 Back round Traffic Intersection Signal Controlled Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour AM PM Intersection Control MOEs Peak Hour Peak Hour Oand Meridian/Main Waltman/Central NB Intersection C D 0.81 0.66 0.33 LOS 0.81 0.36 Intersection 20.7 36.0 0.05 Meridian/Main 0.18 Oand 0.76 Traffic Signal Delay (s/v) Intersection 0.71 WB 0.54 Waltman/Central 0.80 0.91 0.56 0.74 v/c Worst Lane E(SBL) F(SBL) Group LOS Table 12 — Lane Group We Ratio —2022 Back round Traffic Intersection Signal Controlled Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Pcak Hour LT THRU RT LT THRU RT Oand Meridian/Main Waltman/Central NB 0.68 0.56 0.36 0.81 0.66 0.33 SB 0.81 0.36 0.01 0.87 0.61 0.05 EB 0.18 0.12 0.76 0.20 0.08 0.71 WB 0.54 0.05 0.80 0.91 0.04 0.87 Mitigation The westbound movement on Central Drive will operate at LOS F in the PM peak hour. This movement already has two lanes. The north and south bound through movements have three lanes. There is not touch that can be done to mitigate this intersection. The overall intersection operation is acceptable. The LOS of the turn movements could be improved by adjusting the timing, but the overall delay at the intersection would increase. November 2017 17 Traffic Impact Study ThompsonEngineers Tanner Creek Subdivision Traffic and Civil Inc: Meridian, Idaho 2022Build-Out Year Total Traffic Roadway Segment Level of Service The study area roadway segments level of service were evaluated with 2022 total traffic. Table 13 and Table 14 summarize the results. All study area roadway segments are expected to meet minimum operational thresholds with the existing lane configuration. No roadway capacities improvements are needed to mitigate 2022 total traffic. T.,hlo 1 R ._ T2—h.1w Cnamnnt ThrPchnlrle — 21127. Tntal Traffic nn T.ncal Streets Roadway Segment Background Traffic Site Traffic Total Traffic Below Threshold? Eider Drive east of Pelican Way 438 250 688 Yes Gander Drive east of Linder Road 409 250 659 Yes Pelican Way south of Waltman Drive 964 250 1114 Yes Pintail Drive south of Waltman Drive 594 50 644 Yes Waltman Drive east of Pelican Way 282 50 332 Yes m ,hto 1 A _ TP—ri—n- Canmant T .evPl of CervieP — 21122. Tntal Traffic. nn C'nllector Roads Intersection Capacity Analysis and Level of Service To determine the 2022 total traffic impacts, the study area intersections were analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configuration. Copies of the calculations are included in the appendix. Tablel5, Table 16 and Table 17 summarize the intersection capacity analysis results. All study area intersections are projected to meet minimum operational thresholds. Tohln 1 G — TntPrenetinn T,evel of Service — 2022 Total Traffic StOD Controlled AM PM Peak Hour Control MOEs Peak Hour Peak Hour LOS D Directional Meet A A Volume Volume (vpb); Minimum AM PM Linder Road And Stop Functional Left -Turn Threshold Acceptable Roadway Segment Class. Lane Type (vph) Peak Peak LOS? Waltman Lane East of Johnson Collector None 425 267 251 Yes Intersection Capacity Analysis and Level of Service To determine the 2022 total traffic impacts, the study area intersections were analyzed with the existing intersection control and lane configuration. Copies of the calculations are included in the appendix. Tablel5, Table 16 and Table 17 summarize the intersection capacity analysis results. All study area intersections are projected to meet minimum operational thresholds. Tohln 1 G — TntPrenetinn T,evel of Service — 2022 Total Traffic StOD Controlled November 2017 18 AM PM Intersection Control MOEs Peak Hour Peak Hour LOS A A (WB) O Linder Road And Stop Delay (s/v) 9.2 9.7 (WB Gander) (WB) Gander Drive Worst Lane A (WB) A (WB) Group LOS November 2017 18 Engineers Inc. Traffic Impact Study Tanner Creek Subdivision Tahle 16 — Intersection Level of Service - 2022 Total Traffic Signal Controlled Table 17 —Lane Group vie Ratio— 2022 Total Traffic Intersection Sigat Controlled Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour AM ' PM .Intersection Control MOEs Peak Hour. :Peak Hour. 3O Meridian/Main and Waltman/Central NB Intersection C D 0.89 0.83 0.36 LOS 0.81 0.41 0.03 284 36.0 0.13 Meridian/MainIntersection 0.21 ODelay and Tra ffic Signal (s/v) 0.82 WB Intersection 0.07 0.80 0.91 Waltman/Central 0.87 0.58 0.77 Worst Lane F(EBR) P(WBR) Group LOS Table 17 —Lane Group vie Ratio— 2022 Total Traffic Intersection Sigat Controlled Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour. - LT TRRU RT LT TURD RT 3O Meridian/Main and Waltman/Central NB 0.78 0.63 0.40 0.89 0.83 0.36 SB 0.81 0.41 0.03 0.87 0.73 0.13 EB 0.21 0.14 0.88 0.21 0.11 0.82 WB 0.54 0.07 0.80 0.91 0.10 0.87 Mitigation The westbound movement on Central Drive will operate at LOS F in the PM peak hour. This movement already has two lanes. The north and south bound through movements have three lanes. There is not much that can be done to mitigate this intersection. The overall intersection operation is acceptable. The LOS of the tum movements could be improved by adjusting the timing, but the overall delay at the intersection would increase. November 2017 19 Trak Impact Study Thompson Engineers Tanner Creek Subdivision naWc znd Cron n,o. Meridian, Idaho APPENDIX SCOPE AND COMPASS AREA OF INFLUENCE RESULTS TRAFFIC COUNTS CRASH DATA SYNCHRO REPORTS TURN LANE WARRANT WORKSHEETS November 2017 If this scope is nut per your undetstandiug, please let me know. Dan Thompson Thompson L gineevs (20",1-0410 CoL2 Data llection L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study: THOM0105 File Name : Linder Rd & Gander Dr Intersection: Linder Rd / Gander Dr Site Code : 00000000 City, State: Meridian, Idaho Start Date : 8/17/2017 Control: Stop Sign Page No : 1 Groups Printed- General Traffic 08:00 AM 10 Linder Road 0 13 Gander Drive 0 1 Linder Road 0 20 0 20 From North 08:15 AM 18 From East 0 22 From South 2 0 Start Time Thru Left Peds I App. Total Right Left i Peds I App. Total Ri ht I Thru I Peds FAPP. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 6 1 0 7 12 0 0 12 0 19 0 19 38 07:15 AM 6 4 0 10 6 0 0 6 0 23 0 23 39 07:30 AM 6 0 0 6 11 0 0 11 0 27 0 27 44 07:45 AM 15 2 0 17 4 0 0 4 0 30 0 30 51 Total 33 7 0 40 33 0 0 33 0 99 0 99 172 08:00 AM 10 3 0 13 7 0 1 8 0 20 0 20 41 08:15 AM 18 4 0 22 5 2 0 7 0 28 0 28 57 08:30 AM 13 1 0 14 9 1 3 13 0 26 0 26 53 08:45 AM 17 5 0 22 6 3 2 11 1 23 0 24 57 Total 58 13 0 71 27 6 6 39 1 97 0 98 208 04:00 PM 33 3 0 36 7 0 0 7 0 20 0 20 63 04:15 PM 28 9 0 37 5 0 1 6 0 22 0 22 65 04:30 PM 39 12 0 51 8 1 1 10 0 18 0 18 79 04:45 PM 36 6 0 42 1 0 0 1 0 22 0 22 65 Total 136 30 0 166 21 1 2 24 0 82 0 82 272 05:00 PM 38 12 0 50 5 0 2 7 0 24 0 24 81 05:15 PM 42 9 0 51 2 0 1 3 0 25 0 25 79 05:30 PM 36 8 0 44 11 0 2 13 0 29 0 29 86 05:45 PM 28 12 0 40 3 0 1 4 0 32 0 32 76 Total 144 41 0 185 21 0 6 27 0 110 0 110 322 Grand Total 371 91 0 462 102 7 14 123 1 388 0 389 974 Apprch % 80.3 19.7 0 82.9 5.7 11.4 I 0.3 99.7 0 Total % 38.1 9.3 0 47.4 10.5 0.7 1.4 12.6 0.1 39.8 0 39.9 Study: THOM0105 Intersection: Linder Rd / Gander Dr City, State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign L2 Data Collection L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 800-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 File Name : Linder Rd 8 Gander Dr Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 8/17/2017 Page No :2 Linder Road LIn � 6 TrL9R Ped. Tr &tiflmTO>UO AM ,� � &1TR0965:0.5 PM 9 T T r ]69 , 9 Ou( In Tolel L2 Data Collection 1-213ataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study: THOM0105 Intersection: Linder Rd / Gander or City, State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign File Name : Linder Rd & Gander or Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 8/17/2017 Page No : 3 Peak flour AnalYSIS I -mm ut:uu AM to ii.eo Am - reaK I or I Peak Hour far Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM 08:00 AMI 10 3 0 13 08:15 AM 16 4 0 22 08:30 AM 13 1 0 14 0 1 a 0 20 0 2 0 7 0 28 0 1 3 13 0 26 0 under Road TN M Ped. Peak Hour Data odh Peak Hour eegNs atna:0eA r� —�}} $ G a etla ®® Ond In TAW Int. Total 20 41 28 57 26 53 Linder Road Gander Drive From North From Fast Linder Road From South Start Time Thru Left Peds .Total R' ht LORI Peds I APPjCAE11 I Right I Thru I Peds I Apo. Total Peak flour AnalYSIS I -mm ut:uu AM to ii.eo Am - reaK I or I Peak Hour far Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM 08:00 AMI 10 3 0 13 08:15 AM 16 4 0 22 08:30 AM 13 1 0 14 0 1 a 0 20 0 2 0 7 0 28 0 1 3 13 0 26 0 under Road TN M Ped. Peak Hour Data odh Peak Hour eegNs atna:0eA r� —�}} $ G a etla ®® Ond In TAW Int. Total 20 41 28 57 26 53 L2 Data Collection L2DataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study: THOM0105 Intersection: Linder Rd / Gander or City, State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign File Name : Linder Rd $ Gander or Site Code : 00000000 Start Data : 8/1712017 Page No :4 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - FasK 1 011 Peak Hour for Each Approach R.1 a a0 Linder Road Gander Drive From North From East Linder Road From South Stan Tl a I Thm I Left I Peds I Aov.Total RI h Left I PedslAPP.TOWII RightRightl ThrU I Face Ar. .Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - FasK 1 011 Peak Hour for Each Approach R.1 a a0 Int. Total 08:00 AM 08:00 AM 07:30 AM +0 mins. 10 3 0 13 7 0 1 8 0 27 0 27 +15 mins. 18 4 0 22 5 2 0 7 0 30 0 30 +30 mins. 13 1 0 14 9 1 3 13 0 20 0 20 +45 mins. 17 5 0 22 8 3 2 0 28 0 28 Total Volume 58 13 0 71 27 8 8 39 39 0 105 0 105 81.7 18.3 0 89.2 15.4 .4 0 100 0 PHF HF .808 .850 .000 .80 .]50 .500 . .500 .750 .000 .875 .000 .875 Int. Total UnderR°atl ODAM B 13 Toru Lpa Petla I� 1 Peak Hour Data r g� 8 in -Peak Hour. D7:30 AM Int. Total L2 Data Collection I-WataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study: THOM0105 File Name : Linder Rd & Gander or Intersection: Linder Rd / Gander or Site Code : 00000000 City, State: Meridian, Idaho Start Date : 8/17/2017 Control: Stop Sign Page No : 5 Hour Analysis From 12:00 YM to 05:45 YM - Yeah T or 1 Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PMI 38 12 0 50 5 05:15 PM 42 9 0 57 2 05:30 PM 36 8 0 44 11 0 2 7 0 24 0 24 0 1 3 0 25 0 25 0 2 13 0 29 0 29 81 79 a8 LNtler Rae Ond In � T i 1311 1 law a Tlw L¢R Pada Peak Hour Data T t„P Rain Peek Hmlreepina ets5:0aP ��c 3R T R� 110 W aal 81 79 a8 L2 Data Collection L213ataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study: THOM0105 Intersection: Linder Rd / Gander or City, State: Meridian, Idaho Control: Stop Sign File Name : Linder Rd & Gander Or Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 8/17/2017 Page No : 6 7 0 24 0 24 3 0 25 0 25 3 0 29 0 29 LMtlar Rasa nnM Tr Loft Pea, Peak Hour Data Tt� "a oa RUN 5F a In- Peak Hour. 05:00 PM Int Total Linder Road GanderDrive Ftom North From Fast Linder Road From South S ime ru Leff .Total RI ht le Peas 11 Aov, Tmod I Mehl I Thru I Peds A To I 7 0 24 0 24 3 0 25 0 25 3 0 29 0 29 LMtlar Rasa nnM Tr Loft Pea, Peak Hour Data Tt� "a oa RUN 5F a In- Peak Hour. 05:00 PM Int Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each A mach Be Ins at: 0430 PM 05:00 PM +0 mins. 39 12 0 51 5 0 2 +15 mins. 36 6. 0 42 2 0 1 +30 mins. 38 12 0 50 11 0 2 7 0 24 0 24 3 0 25 0 25 3 0 29 0 29 LMtlar Rasa nnM Tr Loft Pea, Peak Hour Data Tt� "a oa RUN 5F a In- Peak Hour. 05:00 PM Int Total L2 Data Collection 1_2OataCollection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study: THOM0105 File Name : Meridian Rd -Main St & Central Dr -Waltman Intersection: Meddlan/Main/Central/Walt Site Code :00000000 City, State: Meridian, Idaho Start Date : 8/17/2017 Control: Signalized Page No : 1 04:00 PM Meridian Road / Main Street 337 Central Orive 2 384 Meridian Road 84 0 134 Warman Lane 344 0 0 414 From North 00 15 From East 4 936 04:15 PM From South 314 27 0 From Waet 47 0 Start Time Right Thru LeR Pada . m RIM I Th. I Left I Peds Ia wI Right I Th,. I Left I Peds w R ht I Thm LeR Pads r ml Mia4 07:00 AM 1 255 26 0 282 13 0 28 2 43 52 249 0 0 301 1118 1 0 0 D i 627 07:15 AM 0 256 16 1 213 '17 0 33 1 51 45 327 i 0 373 5 1 0 0 0 1 698 07:30 AM 0 321 28 0 347 23 0 30 0 53 84 407 1 0 492 3 1 1 1 0 3 895 07:45 AM 1 231 16 0 246 2 0 37 0 85 111 446 1 0 558 1 0 0 0 0 0 871 Total 2 1063 84 1 11501 81 0 128 3 212 I 292 1429 3 0 1724 0 3 1 1 0 5 3091 08:00 AM 0 259 28 0 287 20 1 28 0 49 80 372 1 0 453 0 1 0 0 0 1 790 08:15 AM 1 219 21 0 241 33 0 31 0 64 59 326 0 0 385 2 0 0 0 2 692 08:30 AM 1 294 25 0 320 14 1 55 0 70 52 292 0 0 344 2 0 1 0 3 737 08'45 AM 1 275 24 0 300 21 0 39 0 60 62 319 0 0 381 0 0 1 0 1 742 Total 1 3 1047 88 0 1148 88 2 153 0 2431 253 1309 1 0 15835 0 2 0 7 2961 04:00 PM 0 337 45 2 384 50 0 84 0 134 70 344 0 0 414 1 00 15 3 4 936 04:15 PM 0 314 27 0 341 47 0 90 0 137 7'04:30 84.2 0.2 0 47.5 7.5 37.5 7.5 PM 0 402 36 2 440 53 0 136 2 191 74 407 2 0 483 2 0 2 0 4 1118 04'45 PM 5 322 46 0 373 51 0 116 0 167 60 391 0 0 451 1 0 4 0 5 996 Total 1 5 1375 154 4 15331 201 0 428 2 6291 282 1489 3 0 1774 1 4 1 7 3 15 3958 05:00 PM 2 470 37 1 510 41 0 102 0 1431 0 433 0 0 493 1 0 1 0 2 1148 05:15 PM 0 387 35 1 423 59 0 114 0 173 59 381 4 0 444 6 0 1 0 6 1048 05:30 PMI 4 335 44 0 383 41 0 81 0 122 67 360 0 0 427 0 0 2 0 2 934 Grand Toles 16 4967 490 7 5480 1 554 3 1087 5 1649 1075 5774 11 0 8880 19 3 15 3 40 14029 Arleen% 0.3 90.6 8.9 0.1 33.8 0.2 65.9 0.3 15.7 84.2 0.2 0 47.5 7.5 37.5 7.5 Total % 0.1 35.4 3.5 0 38.1 3.8 0 7.7 0 11.8 7.7 01.2 0.1 0 48.9 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.3 ce .IT,aft xa ,am'. 16 100 4967 100 437 89.2 7 100 5427 99 554 100 3 1 1087 100 5 100 1649 100 1075 00 5>74 100 11 100 0 0 6880 100 19 100 3 1 15 100 3 100 40 100 13978 99.6 0 U -Turn. %U-Tus rn 0 0 0 0 53 10.8 0 0 53 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0.4 L2 Data Collection L2DataCGllection.com Idaho (208) 860-7554 Utah (801) 413-2993 Study: THOM0105 File Name : Meridian Rd -Main St & Central Dr -Waltman Intersection: Meridian/Main/Central/Walt Site Code : 00000000 City, State: Meridian, Idaho Start Date : 8/17/2017 Control: Signalized Page No : 2 Maddlan Road l Main SOdat In 6343 F 5427tfl] 0 a 53 8 496] 4591 ] e !A TrLgfl Petla Ts NN NaM 8nTR01]0]:00 � &1]I20905:45 PM m 3v3 Ga�Mrel T.ft g A y T 9 ~ 11 5]14 10]5 9 0 0 8013 8800 1289 om m rdai HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2022 Total 2: Meridian Rd & Waltman Ln/Central Dr PM Peak -- _- m , Eo 7 ♦ ':waL- ~ war -I- waR. -\ - It t NBT /* NBR L} _.. SBU SBl 1 SBT SBR - ,. Lane C hfiguralions 6.0 } r ri 1 Is 1 ?}} i, 590 N W F Traffic Voland(,ki 56 16 105 492 28 214 176 1737 273 19 147 1703 93 Falun Volame(vi 56 16 105 492 28 214 176 1737 273 19 147 1703 93 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 3 B 18 7 4 14 Inluai O(ON van 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ Pee Bike Adi(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 099 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '.. Parking Bas, Adi 100 1.00 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 108 _ Ad Sal Flow, vnhMM 1863 1863 1937 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1937 1863 1863 1863 Atli Flow Rate, vChM 60 17 112 523 30 228 187 1848 290 156 1812 99 Atli No, of lanes 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 Peak Hoar Factor 094 094 094 0.94 094 094 094 094 0.94 094 094 094 Percent Heavy Vein Y 2 2 2. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, vents 285 154 137 573 310 262 209 2525 816 99 2471 769 Alban On Green 0.08 008 BOB 0.17 017 017 0.12 0.50 0.60 0.10 0.49 0.49 Bal Flow, vans 3442 1fro 1647 3442 1863 192 1774 5085 1643 1774 5085 1583 An ValameNA vehM 60 17 112 523 30 228 187 1848 290 156 1812 99 Grp Sal Flows)vai 1721 1863 1647 1721 1853 1572 1774 1595 1643 1774 1695 1583 O SmyrC B,a 3.4 1.3 100 229 20 212 156 43.1 16.2 13C 42.7 5.1 Cycle O CM -09-).s 2.4 1.3 100 224 20 212 156 43] 16.2 13.0 427 5.1 Fro, In Lane t oo 100 LOO 1.06 1110 100 1.00 100 Lane Gm Cap(c), vehM 285 154 137 573 310 262 209 2525 816 179 2471 769 Vic RatioO,) 0.21 0.11 082 091 CAB 0.87 0.89 073 0.36 0.87 0.73 0.13 Avail Call a), vehM 528 286 252 597 323 272 237 2525 816 213 2471 769 HCM Barrel Role 1.00 1.00 100 100 100 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 100 100 1.00 Upstream Fillerg) 100 100 100 100 100 1.00 015 075 075 100 1.00 100 Union Delay(d), moeh 642 63T 67.7 616 52.9 80.9 652 29.9 23.1 66.5 30.8 21.1 Intt Our, (di Chen 03 0.2 87 17,B 0.1 238 228 1.4 09 283 2.0 0.3 Ini11a10 Oetay(d3),Clveh 00 00 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0,0 %ile Back0f0(95yg,vvUb 2.1 12 8.5 ITO 1.9 16.4 132 270 114 121 27B 4.2 LnGro Oelevldgersh 645 638 764 792 530 84.7 86.1 31.3 240 928 32.8 21.6 lay, soon 715 79.6 35.0 368 15 E C 0 Bassinet Phs 2 3 4 b / C Phs Dnrallon(GaY+RL), 5 310 227 779 16.4 21,1 795 Change Defnd(YHic), s 6.0 50 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 Max Green Sell (Gmax), s 26.0 200 590 230 18.0 60.0 Max O Clear Time (g c+lt),s 24.4 ITS 44.7 120 15.0 45,1 Green Ext Tlme (P_o), s 00 0.1 183 0.4 0,1 140 nlerseetion drarragamy HCM 2010 Cid Delay 43.5 HCM 2010LOS 0 Notre User approved ignoring U-TamIn9 movement Tanner Creek, Meridian, Idaho Synchm 10 Edged Trig, Impact Cindy, October 2017 Tnompsre En9tneers, Inc. HCM 2010 TWSC 2022 Total 3: Ruddy Dr & Waltman Ln PM Peak Int Delay, s/veh 7.9 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 180 0 0 100 Conflicting Peds, Or 0 0 0 0' 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized ` - None None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 " 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 200 0 > 0 111 Maiorl�llnor Majorl =: Major2 -- Minorl .m . Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1 0 401 1 Stage 1 - _ 1 Stage 2 - - - 400 - Critical Hdwy - 4.12 - 6.42 :6,22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5,42 Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1622 - ; 605 1084 Stage 1 - - - 1022 - Stage 2 - 677 Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver, - 1622 - 531 1084 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 531 - Stage 1- - - 896 Stage 2 - - 677 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.103 - - 0.123 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.7 - 7.5 + 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0,4 - Tanner Creek, Meridian, Idaho Synchro 10 Report Traffic Impact Study, October 2017 Thompson Engineers, Inc. HCM 2010 TWSC 2022 Total 4: Apartment Entrance & Waltman Ln PM Peak ,, .. Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Future Vol, veh/h 100 0 117 180 0 60 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized- . None -' None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 _ Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 111 0 130 200 0 67 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 111 0 571 111 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - 460 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Stage 1 - - - - 914 - Stage 2 - - - - 636 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 434 Stage 2 - - - 636 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.071 - - 0.088 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.1 - - 7.7 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile, Q(veh) 0.2 Tanner Creek, Meridian, Idaho Synchro 10 Report Traffic Impact Study, October 2017 Thompson Engineers, Inc. HCM 2000 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2022 Total 2: Meridian Rd & Waltman Ln/Central Dr PM Peak t --, 4- '.- 4- "' 1 j */ Lane Configurations 6 6 2 2 f 't TT T r 7 7 ;I TTT r Traffic Volume (vph) 56 16 105 492 28 214 176 1737 273 19 147 1703 93 Future Volume (vph) 56 16 105 492 28 214 176 1737 273 19 147 1703 93 ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 16 11 11 11 11 12 16 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 96 1.00 0.91 1.00 Fipb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00'- 1.00 ' 1.00 6.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 c0.16 1.00 1.00 1,00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 too 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85' 1.00 1.00 0,85 1.00 1,00 0.851 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.85 At Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 61.9 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow;(prot) 3433 1801 1794 3319 1801, 1497 1711 5085 1750 1.00 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.5 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said Flow (perm) 3433 1801 1794 3319 ` 1801 1497 1711 5085 1750 72.3 1770 5085 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 60 17 112 523 30 228 187 1848 290' 20 156 1812 99 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 106 0 0 189 0 0 141 0 0 0 51 Lane Group Flow (vph)' 66 17 6 523 30 39 187 1848 149! 0 176 1812 48 Conal. Peds.1#mr1 4 2 Protected Phases 6 6 2 2 3 8 7 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.1 8.1 8.1 25.6 25.6 25.6 21.4 72.8 72.8 20.5 72.9 72.9 Effective Green, g (s) 8.1 8,1 8.11 25.6 25,6 25.6 21.4 72.8 72.81 20,5 72.9 72,9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.14 0.49 0.49 0.14 0.49 0.49 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 6.0 5,0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.0 3.0 30 2.5 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 185 97 96 566 307 255 244 2467 8491 241 2474 769 v!s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.01 c0.16 om c0.11 c0.36 0.10 0.36 v!s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.03 6.09 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.18 0.06 0.92 0.10 0.15 0.77 0.75 0.18 0.73 0.73 0.06 uniform Delay, d1 58.3 67,8 67.3 61.2 52,5 53.0 61.9 31:2 21.71 62.1 30,8 20.4 Progression Factor, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.6 0.2 20.9 0,1 0,2 12.1 2.1 0.5 10.2 2.0 0,2 Delay (s) 69.1 68.4 67.5 82.2 52.6 53.2 74.0 33.4 22.2 72.3 32.8 20.6 Level of Service E E E F D D 1= C 0' E C C Annmarh Ilii w - 681 72.6 35.2 35.5 Tanner Creek, Meridian, Idaho Synchro 10 Report Traffic Impact Study, October 2017 Thompson Engineers, Inc. Tanner Creek ACHD Left -Turn Lane Analysis 2022 Total Traffic R-"—(• ler-,1kins *MA ?, 1 20% 1511N, 10% in VA ago TOO CL 80G E 838 O > 4,00 0 Q. CL 0 290 103 0 Speed Asir.( Left-Ttli Advancing Opposing Limit Peak Volume Volume Left -Turn Meet Intersection Approach (mph) Hour (vph) (vph) Volume (%) Warrant? AM 46 0 100% No G) Ruddy Dr and Waltman EB 25 4 PM 180 0 100% No AM 79 167 42% No G) Apartment Entrance EB 25 PM 297 100 39% No R-"—(• ler-,1kins *MA ?, 1 20% 1511N, 10% in VA ago TOO CL 80G E 838 O > 4,00 0 Q. CL 0 290 103 0 2CO 363 <0 WD Advancing Volume- (vph) AM Peak 0 C10 7130 O PM Peak Asir.( Left-Ttli rn No Left-tu 6l -ji Lane e 4 3 a I 2CO 363 <0 WD Advancing Volume- (vph) AM Peak 0 C10 7130 O PM Peak