Loading...
Brighton Corp 1.16 12601 W. Explorer Drive Suite 200 Boise, Idaho 83713 www.brightoncorp.com p. 208-378-4000 f. 208-377-8962 January 16, 2018 Mayor and City Council City of Meridian RE: Linder Village Application Although we generally refrain from commenting on the development applications of others, we are occasionally dragged into the conversation by representations made in public hearings or at other stages in the process. Unfortunately, such is the case with the Linder Village application. I was made aware that Senator Chuck Winder, in testimony to the City Council, made certain representations regarding Brighton interactions that do not reflect reality. In particular, Mr. Winder stated: “Brighton Corporation has, over the time period, basically been unwilling because of the negative impact it would have on their Fox Run access, to allow a major connection as the primary access. That is why the signal (on Chinden) is necessary.” Let me first state that I have a lot of respect for Mr. Winder, but this statement simply isn’t true. Over a period of several months, perhaps over a year, Mr. Winder contacted me on at least 3 occasions asking if we could get together to discuss the Linder Village proposal and access to Fox Run. Each time I said of course and even suggested times that I would be available. Mr. Winder said he would get back to me to set up a time but he never did. On June 26, 2017, Erika Bowen of ITD met with me in my office to ascertain whether the concept of the backage road from Linder to Fox Run could be implemented, with the cooperation and participation of ACHD, in order to avoid an additional signal on Chinden. I assured Erika that we were willing to do so. On June 30, the staffs of ITD, ACHD, Meridian City and Brighton met to go over the details on how this would be implemented through Brighton’s property. ITD, ACHD and Meridian City staffs all support the backage road. Unfortunately, it appears to us that this developer has no interest in implementing the backage road into their plan in any effective manner. Both ITD and ACHD staffs, along with the North Meridian Plan, strongly support backage roads and traffic signals at the half mile only. To date, Meridian City has held firm to that same policy. Mr. Winder suggests that the Fox Run signal violates the half-mile policy but that is splitting hairs. ITD required that we align our Paramount access to Chinden with the existing Fox Run on the north side of Chinden because it was an existing intersection very near the half-mile. They also required that the access be signalized. In order to accomplish the ITD requirement, we were required to purchase an additional 5 acres to the west. Mr. Winder cast another sideways aspersion at Brighton by stating that, “It’s quite interesting that it (Costco) ended up on a Brighton piece of property.” I won’t dignify that comment other than to state that we never once contacted Costco - they came to us - and it didn’t have anything to do with the reasons Mr. Winder suggested. Having thus been dragged into the conversation, I’ll state our position clearly. If a proper backage road is proposed, which has been contemplated in the North Meridian Plan and supported by ITD, ACHD and Meridian City staff, Brighton will cooperate with ACHD and ITD according to their proposals to participate. If a proper backage road is not proposed, we see no benefit in linking the projects as this developer has shown. Again, the developer has made no follow up efforts to discuss connection types or locations with us. Furthermore, we are opposed to the additional signal on Chinden. It is in violation of the North Meridian Plan and ITD policy. When Winston Moore developed the Kohls and Brighton developed the Lowes at Eagle and Ustick, both tenants requested a signal at the mutual access point on Eagle Road and stated that if they didn’t get that signal that they would likely have to look elsewhere. ITD and Meridian City declined to grant the signal. Instead, we worked with ACHD to create the backage road system and signals on Ustick Road and both centers were developed. The Ustick Marketplace backage road, Records Ave., now extends all the way to Fairview and serves The Village. Nothing in this letter should be construed as opposition to Winco or the development of the property in general. We believe this can be an important addition to the City if done properly but feel that it is important to correct the record before the Council makes a decision on this application. Sincerely, David Turnbull Brighton Corporation